View
95
Download
0
Category
Tags:
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
Toolkit for evaluating CCSS curriculum (math). Toolkit for evaluating CCSS curriculum (math). Overview. Basis. http :// www.corestandards.org http://www.cde.ca.gov/ci/ma/cf. The Toolkit. Evaluative Based on CDE Framework Based on the Math Progressions Based on CCSS Standards. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Toolkit for evaluating
CCSS curriculum
(math)
Toolkit for evaluating
CCSS curriculum
(math) Overview
Basis
http://www.corestandards.org
http://www.cde.ca.gov/ci/ma/cf
3
The Toolkit• Evaluative• Based on CDE
Framework• Based on the Math
Progressions• Based on CCSS
Standards
4
OrganizationSection 1:
Alignment to standards and progressions
-Cluster, scope and sequence
Section 2:
Alignment to the (draft) Framework
-Alignment to standards
-Program Organization
-Assessment
-Universal Access
-Instructional Strategies
5
Organization
6
Domain
cluster
Standards (1, 2, 2.1 & 3)
cluster
Section 1Alignment to standards and progressions
1. The need to build content knowledge.
2. The need to build pedagogy.
3. The scope of CCSS-math
7
Section 1K-2:• Counting and Cardinality
Page 5: The textbook provides daily routines that help students develop their proficiency with both perceptual and conceptual subitizing (being able to “see” the quantity of a set without having to count) as a foundation for single-digit fluency. For example, students should have plentiful opportunities to develop the ability to recognize the cardinality of a collection of 9 objects arranged in various ways (i.e. 7 and 2, 4 and 5, etc.). See page 4 of CC and OA Progression.
8
Section 1K-2:• Lessons that lead to 3rd grade multiplication
Page 7: Students engage with addition in ways that prepare them for multiplication. Examples should include skip counting (2.NBT.2), arrays (2.OA.4) and repeated addition (2.OA.4). Multiplication itself should not be introduced until 3rd grade.
3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18…
6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36…
2, 4, 6, 8, 10…
9
Section 13-5:• Approach to multiplication (page 9)
Students develop an understanding of the meanings for multiplication and division of whole numbers through activities and problems involving equal-sizedgroups, arrays and areamodels.
10
Section 13-5:• Approach to fractions (page 11)
· Use of number lines (Number and Operations- Fractions Progression)
· The textbook addresses fractions by using a number line diagram.
· The textbook compares two fractions with the same numerator or the same denominator by reasoning about their size.
11
A DC E FB
1/2 1
Section 16-8:• Approach to number systems• Approach to ratios and proportionsQuote from the toolkit: a. The textbook represents addition and subtraction of rational numbers on horizontal and / or vertical number line diagrams. (7.NS.1)
12
A DC E FB
1/2 1.7
Section 2Section 2:
Alignment to the (draft) Framework
-Alignment to standards
-Program Organization
-Assessment
-Universal Access
13
Alignment to standards
Part 1: The mathematics content is correct, factually accurate…
-Review various lessons
-Is the content correct?
-Correct definitions
-Use of manipulatives
-No mnemonics or tricks
14
Alignment to standards
Part 2: The materials …include the standards for mathematical practice at each grade level or course.
15
Alignment to standards
Part 3: In any single grade… students and teachers… spend the large majority of their time, approximately three-quarters… on major clusters
16
Alignment to standards
Part 4: Consistent Progressions: Materials are consistent with the progressions in the Standards
17
Section 2:Program Organization
How is the textbook set-up?• Standard/cluster• Organized by clusters within units• Intervention (RtI)• Acceleration Components• Support Materials
18
Assessment
General materials and SBAC Specific:• Variety of assessments (formative)• Summative• Content and Practice Standards• Concept, computation, fluency and
application• Acceleration and compression aspects
19
Assessment
General materials and SBAC Specific:• Claim #1 – assessment of concept• Claim #2 – assessment problem solving
strategies• Claim #3 – assessment provides
opportunity to construct a viable argument• Claim #4 – assessment through complex,
real-world scenarios• Technology enhanced problems
20
Universal Access
2013 Math Framework, “Students with special needs must be provided access to the same standards-based curriculum that is provided to all students…”• Differentiation• Correction for common misconceptions• Specialized teaching methods / materials for students
with special needs• Strategies for English Learners• Strategies for students with disabilities• Alternate lessons for exceptional students (depth and
complexity21
Appendix A - scoring
22
Toolkit for evaluating
CCSS curriculum
(math)
Section 1Alignment to standards and progressions
1. The need to build content knowledge.
2. The need to build pedagogy.
3. The scope of CCSS-math
24
In small groups, review Section Oneof the toolkit.
1. Thoughts2. Concerns3. Ideas4. Questions
Section 2Section 2:
Alignment to the (draft) Framework
-Alignment to standards
-Program Organization
-Assessment
-Universal Access
27
Alignment to standards
Part 1: The mathematics content is correct, factually accurate…
-Review various lessons
-Is the content correct?
-Correct definitions
-Use of manipulatives
-No mnemonics or tricks
28
Alignment to standards
Part 2: The materials …include the standards for mathematical practice at each grade level or course.
29
Review Section 2, Parts 1 & 2
“Alignment to Standards”(pgs. 19-15)of the toolkit.
Alignment to standards
Part 3: In any single grade… students and teachers… spend the large majority of their time, approximately three-quarters… on major clusters
31
Alignment to standards
Part 4: Consistent Progressions: Materials are consistent with the progressions in the Standards
32
Review Section 2, Parts 3 & 4
“Alignment to Standards” (pgs. 26-
29)of the toolkit.
Alignment to standards
Part 5: Coherent Connections
34
Review Section 2, Part 5 & UA/IS “Alignment to
Standards”(pgs. 30-33)of the toolkit.
Program Organization
How is the textbook set-up?• Standard/cluster• Organized by clusters within units• Intervention (RtI)• Acceleration Components• Support Materials
36
Pages34-36
Assessment
General materials and SBAC Specific:• Variety of assessments (formative)• Summative• Content and Practice Standards• Concept, computation, fluency and
application• Acceleration and compression aspects
37Pages 37 & 38
Assessment
General materials and SBAC Specific:• Claim #1 – assessment of concept• Claim #2 – assessment problem solving
strategies• Claim #3 – assessment provides opportunity
to construct a viable argument• Claim #4 – assessment through complex,
real-world scenarios• Technology enhanced problems
38Pages 39 – 44 & 45
Universal Access
2013 Math Framework, “Students with special needs must be provided access to the same standards-based curriculum that is provided to all students…”• Differentiation• Correction for common misconceptions• Specialized teaching methods / materials for students
with special needs• Strategies for English Learners• Strategies for students with disabilities• Alternate lessons for exceptional students (depth and
complexity39Pages 46 – 47
Appendix A - scoring
40
Final Thoughts
Page 48
-You are not limited to this
-You can use sections that applicable
-You can skip sections
-You can create new portions
-Piloting
-Publisher presentations
41
Contact Info
Jon Dueck
jdueck@fcoe.org
559.497.3792
http://commoncore.fcoe.org/
http://stem.fcoe.org/
@mrdueck
42
Recommended