The Black-Hole – Halo Mass Relation and High Redshift Quasars Stuart Wyithe Avi Loeb (The...

The Black-Hole – Halo Mass Relation and High

Redshift Quasars

Stuart Wyithe Avi Loeb (The University of Melbourne) (Harvard University)

Fan et al. (2001)

-SMBHs and dark matter halos

-SMBHs and quasars

-The quasar correlation function

-Extending the SMBH -- halo relation to earlier times. Is dark matter halo mass or velocity more important for formation?

• The bulges of all local galaxies contain SMBHs.

• There is a tight relation between and SMBH mass (e.g. Merritt & Ferrarese 2001; Tremaine et al.

2002).

• There is a relation between and vhalo, and hence a relation between SMBH and dark matter halo mass.

Black-Hole & Dark-Matter Halo Masses

Ferrarese (2002)

€

M bh

M halo

=ε M halo

1012Mother

⎛

⎝ ⎜

⎞

⎠ ⎟

2 / 3

€

Mbh = 1.9 × 108 vhalo

350km/s

⎛

⎝ ⎜

⎞

⎠ ⎟5

Msolar

€

εSIS =10−5.8

εNFW =10−5.2

Three assumptions:• Both Mbh~vhalo

5 and Mbh~Mhalo5/3 valid at z=0.

• At higher redshift, galaxies form out of a denser background, have a larger binding energy per unit mass, and therefore a larger circular velocity.

• Is halo mass or velocity the determining factor?

How is the SMBH Related to its Host Halo at Larger Redshifts?

€

M bh

M halo

=ε M halo

1012

⎛ ⎝ ⎜

⎞ ⎠ ⎟

23(1+ )z

52

€

M bh

M halo

=ε M halo

1012

⎛ ⎝ ⎜

⎞ ⎠ ⎟

23

SMBH mass dependent on halo mass

SMBH mass dependent on halo velocity

• Quasars are powered by accretion onto a SMBH.

• The velocity dispersion -- SMBH mass relation is also seen in quasars. (e.g. McLure & Dunlop 2002)

• Accretion is near the Eddington Rate. (e.g. Willott et al. 2003; Elvis et al. 1994)

Boyle et al. (2000)

• Quasars offer a pointer to the evolution of the SMBH population to z~6.

Quasars

€

LB = 5.73×1011ηMbh

108Msolar

⎛

⎝ ⎜

⎞

⎠ ⎟LB ,solar

Three assumptions:• The quasar correlation function measures, as a function of distance R, the excess probability above random that two quasars will be separated by R.

• Larger halos are more highly clustered.

• The Mbh-Mhalo relation, and accretion at the Eddington rate relate luminosity to halo mass; and therefore the quasar correlation function to the dark matter halo correlation function.

The Quasar Correlation Function.

€

LB = f (Mhalo)

€

ξ R,Mhalo,z( )⇒ ξ R,mB ,z( )

€

mB = f (LB ,z)

Large Scale Distribution of QuasarsFrom the 2dF Quasar Redshift Survey

• Redshifts for 25,000 quasars in two strips.

• The correlation function tests the relation between luminosity and halo mass.

Croom et al. (2000,2001)

Comparison with Observed Quasar Correlation Function Assuming Mbh ~ vhalo

5

• The correlation function is in agreement with quasars that shine near their limiting rate.

Correlation Length

Croom et al. (2000,2001)

Evolution of Clustering Length With Redshift and Luminosity (Mbh~vhalo

5)

• More luminous samples are more highly clustered.

• Clustering increases with redshift in a flux limited sample.

Preliminary SDSS data

What if Mbh≈Mhalo2/3 With No Redshift

Dependence?

• Black-holes comprise a larger fraction of a galaxies mass at earlier times

Preliminary SDSS data

€

LB = 3.6 ×1011 ε

εSIS

⎛

⎝ ⎜

⎞

⎠ ⎟η med

Mhalo

1012

⎛

⎝ ⎜

⎞

⎠ ⎟5 / 3

1+ z

4

⎛

⎝ ⎜

⎞

⎠ ⎟5 / 2

• No evolution in the Mbh-Mhalo relation implies Super-Eddington accretion at z~3

€

LB = 3.6 ×1011 ε

εSIS

⎛

⎝ ⎜

⎞

⎠ ⎟η med

Mhalo

1012

⎛

⎝ ⎜

⎞

⎠ ⎟5 / 3

The Correlation Length Favours Larger Mbh/Mhalo at High Redshift

€

ε εSIS( )η med

€

εSIS =10−5.8

εNFW =10−5.2

• The quasar clustering length and its evolution with redshift and luminosity are reproduced if SMBH mass scales only with halo circular velocity.

• The evolution of the clustering length is too rapid if SMBH mass scales only with halo mass.

• This may imply that the mass of a SMBH is regulated by the depth of the potential well of the galaxy.

Black-holes comprise a larger fraction of a galaxies mass at high redshift

Summary