View
218
Download
4
Category
Tags:
Preview:
Citation preview
Successful Applicant for Promotion to Level C and D
Dr Arlie Loughnan, Associate Professor
Sydney Law School
2014Academic Promotions Applicant Information Session
Deciding to Apply
› Ask yourself ‘is now the right time?’/‘what have I done since my last promotion?’:
- If yes, can you make a case for ‘excellence’ in teaching and/or research?
- If not, what do you need to do to be in a position to apply next year?
› Start the decision-making process early:
- Preliminary consultation with HOD/Dean;
- Consult with (select) colleagues (senior colleagues and peers).
› Be realistic: critically assess strengths and weaknesses:
- Draft CV/summary of application and consult again;
- Review the timeline for the application process (esp. date for 1 pg update);
- Think forward to 1 January next year: where will you be at that point?; what do you want to be able to do from that point onwards?
Deciding to Apply
2
Planning the Application
› Consider the application as a whole:
- Save space by avoiding repetition;
- Avoid ‘double-dipping’ (although there is some flexibility about where certain activities belong eg HDR supervision).
› Referees:
- Referees should add to what you can say for yourself & address the criteria;
- Think laterally (ie beyond supervisors, examiners) & ‘Double-up’ where possible.
› Supplementary material:
- Allow time for collection and organisation of material (eg citations).
› Completing the application form online: double the time you think you will need (the ‘end matter’).
3
The Application
› Convince the Committee of the merits of your case on the basis of this section alone;
› Lead with a short punchy summary paragraph;
› Demonstrate an upward trajectory in your teaching/research/service;
› Provide an individualised account of strengths/achievements;
› Make the strongest possible case across teaching, research and service;
› Use evidence judiciously – avoid re-using the same evidence;
› Do not double dip (although you can split activities that cross over different sections eg administrative roles);
› Be detailed/descriptive but do so as succinctly as possible (eg ‘In addition’, ‘At the same time as...’, ‘Concurrently...’).
Summary of Application
› Demonstrate superior competency/skill and level of self-reflection about teaching.
› What kind of teacher are you? What is ‘excellence in teaching’ to you?
› Develop a narrative (eg leadership in teaching, scholarship in teaching)
› Outline what you do differently/consistently and its pedagogical value
› Explain what is involved in teaching in Faculty/School (eg class sizes, coordinating tutors, curriculum renewal/development, lectures or seminars)
› Support all aspects of this section with evidence (USEs, emails, invitations to teach, above load teaching, report from colleague/co-teacher)
› Supervision of HDR students, completions (student success)
› Don’t forget: informal/formal mentoring of junior colleagues, teaching conferences/colloquia, guest classes, and training.
Teaching Case
5
The Application
› Demonstrate that you have a research agenda that you prosecute actively and that results in high quality research outputs.
› What is your ‘hook’? (eg monograph, grants, impact, public engagement)
› Explain to a non-specialist what is significant about your research
› Benchmark yourself (‘Relative to what would be expected at Level X, ...’)
› Dissemination:
- Include national and international outputs
- Provide detail about discipline-specific aspects of ‘excellence’
- Demonstrate reflection about the readership/scholarly community
› Recognition for research (eg by professional community)
› Research leadership (journal editorships, edited collections etc)
Research Case
6
The Application
Service Case
›Demonstrate good citizenship of scholarly/other communities
›Provide detail about what your service involved (meetings, reports);
- ‘Over and above my role as member, ....’
- ‘Biweekly meetings covering everything involved in hosting a major conference...’
›Indicate length of service commitment (consistency counts);
›Take into account the role of others (I/We/The Committee...);
›Remember: media commentary, writing for a popular audience, guest presentations, University consultancies, extra-curricular activities, activities with USyd student community and alumni.
7
General Points
• Answer the selection criteria: articulate why you deserve promotion (ie avoid leaving it to the Committee to work it out);
• Say what you have done and why it is important – give the committee concrete reasons to promote you;
• Don’t assume even your closest colleagues really know what you do or have done – spell it out for the selection committee members, many of whom will not be in your discipline;
• Don’t assume even your closest colleagues know who the experts or best journals are in your field – again, be succinct and, without being patronising, spell it out;
• Back up every statement with evidence'
• And, most importantly, remember that there is no single type of successful application.
General Points
Good luck!
9
Recommended