State Accountability System and New School Report Cards

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

State Accountability System and New School Report Cards. Changing Accountability System. Multiple Measures Student achievement Student growth Closing achievement gaps Attendance/graduation rates ACT participation and performance Testing, absenteeism and dropout rates - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

1

STATE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM AND NEW SCHOOL REPORT CARDS

2

CHANGING ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM

Multiple Measures Student achievement Student growth Closing achievement gaps Attendance/graduation rates ACT participation and performance Testing, absenteeism and dropout rates

Single year to three years “NAEPized” cut scores Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs)

3

NAEPIZED CUT SCORES 

WKCE Reading Scale Score by GradePerformance

Level 3 4 5 6 7 8 10Advanced

507 536 546 573 590 613 644Proficient

475 498 503 525 535 548 566Basic

445 462 464 479 486 493 496Minimal

Performance270 280 290 300 310 330 350

READING Minimal Performance Basic Proficient Advanced

Third Grade 270-393 394-429 430-465 466-640

Fourth Grade 280-395 396-439 440-488 489-650

Fifth Grade 290-400 401-443 444-496 497-690

Sixth Grade 300-417 418-456 457-513 514-730

Seventh Grade 310-433 434-466 467-522 523-780

Eighth Grade 330-444 445-479 480-538 539-790

Tenth Grade 350-455 456-502 503-554 555-820

New

Old

4

NAEPIZED CUT SCORES

DPI resources: http://dpi.wi.gov/oea/pdf/impactdata.pdf -

explanation of the new cut scores http://dpi.wi.gov/oea/pdf/highexp.pdf - one page

overview of increased expectations http://dpi.wi.gov/sprntdnt/doc/ltr-repcard.doc -

DPI sample letter to parents noting increased expectations and changing cut-scores

Time to discuss strategies (~5 min)

5

ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIVES (AMOS)

No more AYP targets – now considering AMOs

Refer to: http://dpi.wi.gov/oea/amo.html

6

ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIVES

AMOs for graduation rates – goal of 85%

Title I Priority and Focus Schools – exit criteria Title I Priority – lowest achievement, required

reforms Title I Focus – low subgroups, reform choices

District AMOs At least one level (HS, MS, ES) “meets

expectations” No schools in “fails to meet expectations” District Report Cards next year

7

SCHOOL REPORT CARD!

8

Components:

1. Accountability Determination

2. Priority Areas

3. Student Engagement Indicators

4. School Information

5. WSAS Percent Proficient and Advanced

9

Components:

1. Accountability Determination

2. Priority Areas

3. Student Engagement Indicators

4. School Information

5. WSAS Percent Proficient and Advanced

10

Components:

1. Accountability Determination

2. Priority Areas

3. Student Engagement Indicators

4. School Information

5. WSAS Percent Proficient and Advanced

11

Components:

1. Accountability Determination

2. Priority Areas

3. Student Engagement Indicators

4. School Information

5. WSAS Percent Proficient and Advanced

12

Components:

1. Accountability Determination

2. Priority Areas

3. Student Engagement Indicators

4. School Information

5. WSAS Percent Proficient and Advanced

13

Components:

1. Accountability Determination

2. Priority Areas

3. Student Engagement Indicators

4. School Information

5. WSAS Percent Proficient and Advanced

14

QUICK BREAK + DISCUSSION

With your group discuss your questions about the Report Cards.

Look over the sample Report Card you picked up – ES, MS or HS.

15

FOUR PRIORITY AREAS

Student Achievement

Student Growth

Closing Gaps

On-Track and Postsecondary Readiness

16

STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT

See the Technical Report Card p. 2 – handout1) Multiply # of students by multiplier2) Divide by average attendance3) Weight each year4) Scale of 50

17

STUDENT GROWTH

See the Technical Report Card p. 4 – handout1) Points for growth trajectory2) Points off for decline trajectory3) Complex calculations (“black box”)4) Scale of 50

18

CLOSING GAPS

See the Technical Report Card p. 6 (or 7)1) Find the change in subgroups scores2) Divide by 50, find average change3) Penalty if comparison group declines4) Scale of 50

19

CLOSING GAPS – GRADUATION (HS)

o Same procedure – using graduation rateso Worth 50 points, achievement worth 25

each

20

ON-TRACK AND POSTSECONDARY READINESS

See the Technical Report Card p. 8Combine: Graduation or attendance rate

3rd grade reading/8th grade math

ACT participation/performance

21

STUDENT ENGAGEMENT INDICATORS (P. 10)

Test Participation – 95% or higher

Absenteeism – no more than 13%

Dropouts – no more than 6 %

- 5 points each

22

ELEMENTARY AND MIDDLE SCHOOL REPORT CARD

The four priority areas average to accountability determination as follows:• Student Achievement- 25%• Student Growth- 25%• Closing Gaps- 25%• On track indicators:

• Elementary• 20% attendance• 5% 3rd grade WKCE Reading Scores

• Middle • 20% attendance• 5% 8th grade WKCE Mathematics

Scores

23

THE HIGH SCHOOL REPORT CARD

Has only three priority areas to average to accountability determination:

Student Achievement: 37.5%

Student Growth 0%Closing Gaps: 37.5%On Track/ Post Secondary

Readiness: 25% 20% is the graduation rate 5% ACT Participation and

Performance

24

OUTCOMES

Schools provided with information on strengths and weaknesses

Targeted support from DPI and partners to improve school performance

Rewards and recognition for high performing schools

25

BUILDING SHARED UNDERSTANDING

Group Discussion:How will you roll out the Report Card to

your staff? To your community?

Who are your key stakeholders?What will you communicate? How will you communicate?

26

LET US KNOW HOW WE CAN HELP

Sept 18th and Oct 3rd – more in depth trainings here on the Report Card and communication strategies.

Questions?Kevin Anderson – kevin.anderson@cesa2.org

Nicole Barlass – nicole.barlass@cesa2.org

Recommended