Upload
reina
View
28
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
State Accountability System and New School Report Cards. Changing Accountability System. Multiple Measures Student achievement Student growth Closing achievement gaps Attendance/graduation rates ACT participation and performance Testing, absenteeism and dropout rates - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
1
STATE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM AND NEW SCHOOL REPORT CARDS
2
CHANGING ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM
Multiple Measures Student achievement Student growth Closing achievement gaps Attendance/graduation rates ACT participation and performance Testing, absenteeism and dropout rates
Single year to three years “NAEPized” cut scores Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs)
3
NAEPIZED CUT SCORES
WKCE Reading Scale Score by GradePerformance
Level 3 4 5 6 7 8 10Advanced
507 536 546 573 590 613 644Proficient
475 498 503 525 535 548 566Basic
445 462 464 479 486 493 496Minimal
Performance270 280 290 300 310 330 350
READING Minimal Performance Basic Proficient Advanced
Third Grade 270-393 394-429 430-465 466-640
Fourth Grade 280-395 396-439 440-488 489-650
Fifth Grade 290-400 401-443 444-496 497-690
Sixth Grade 300-417 418-456 457-513 514-730
Seventh Grade 310-433 434-466 467-522 523-780
Eighth Grade 330-444 445-479 480-538 539-790
Tenth Grade 350-455 456-502 503-554 555-820
New
Old
4
NAEPIZED CUT SCORES
DPI resources: http://dpi.wi.gov/oea/pdf/impactdata.pdf -
explanation of the new cut scores http://dpi.wi.gov/oea/pdf/highexp.pdf - one page
overview of increased expectations http://dpi.wi.gov/sprntdnt/doc/ltr-repcard.doc -
DPI sample letter to parents noting increased expectations and changing cut-scores
Time to discuss strategies (~5 min)
5
ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIVES (AMOS)
No more AYP targets – now considering AMOs
Refer to: http://dpi.wi.gov/oea/amo.html
6
ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIVES
AMOs for graduation rates – goal of 85%
Title I Priority and Focus Schools – exit criteria Title I Priority – lowest achievement, required
reforms Title I Focus – low subgroups, reform choices
District AMOs At least one level (HS, MS, ES) “meets
expectations” No schools in “fails to meet expectations” District Report Cards next year
7
SCHOOL REPORT CARD!
8
Components:
1. Accountability Determination
2. Priority Areas
3. Student Engagement Indicators
4. School Information
5. WSAS Percent Proficient and Advanced
9
Components:
1. Accountability Determination
2. Priority Areas
3. Student Engagement Indicators
4. School Information
5. WSAS Percent Proficient and Advanced
10
Components:
1. Accountability Determination
2. Priority Areas
3. Student Engagement Indicators
4. School Information
5. WSAS Percent Proficient and Advanced
11
Components:
1. Accountability Determination
2. Priority Areas
3. Student Engagement Indicators
4. School Information
5. WSAS Percent Proficient and Advanced
12
Components:
1. Accountability Determination
2. Priority Areas
3. Student Engagement Indicators
4. School Information
5. WSAS Percent Proficient and Advanced
13
Components:
1. Accountability Determination
2. Priority Areas
3. Student Engagement Indicators
4. School Information
5. WSAS Percent Proficient and Advanced
14
QUICK BREAK + DISCUSSION
With your group discuss your questions about the Report Cards.
Look over the sample Report Card you picked up – ES, MS or HS.
15
FOUR PRIORITY AREAS
Student Achievement
Student Growth
Closing Gaps
On-Track and Postsecondary Readiness
16
STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT
See the Technical Report Card p. 2 – handout1) Multiply # of students by multiplier2) Divide by average attendance3) Weight each year4) Scale of 50
17
STUDENT GROWTH
See the Technical Report Card p. 4 – handout1) Points for growth trajectory2) Points off for decline trajectory3) Complex calculations (“black box”)4) Scale of 50
18
CLOSING GAPS
See the Technical Report Card p. 6 (or 7)1) Find the change in subgroups scores2) Divide by 50, find average change3) Penalty if comparison group declines4) Scale of 50
19
CLOSING GAPS – GRADUATION (HS)
o Same procedure – using graduation rateso Worth 50 points, achievement worth 25
each
20
ON-TRACK AND POSTSECONDARY READINESS
See the Technical Report Card p. 8Combine: Graduation or attendance rate
3rd grade reading/8th grade math
ACT participation/performance
21
STUDENT ENGAGEMENT INDICATORS (P. 10)
Test Participation – 95% or higher
Absenteeism – no more than 13%
Dropouts – no more than 6 %
- 5 points each
22
ELEMENTARY AND MIDDLE SCHOOL REPORT CARD
The four priority areas average to accountability determination as follows:• Student Achievement- 25%• Student Growth- 25%• Closing Gaps- 25%• On track indicators:
• Elementary• 20% attendance• 5% 3rd grade WKCE Reading Scores
• Middle • 20% attendance• 5% 8th grade WKCE Mathematics
Scores
23
THE HIGH SCHOOL REPORT CARD
Has only three priority areas to average to accountability determination:
Student Achievement: 37.5%
Student Growth 0%Closing Gaps: 37.5%On Track/ Post Secondary
Readiness: 25% 20% is the graduation rate 5% ACT Participation and
Performance
24
OUTCOMES
Schools provided with information on strengths and weaknesses
Targeted support from DPI and partners to improve school performance
Rewards and recognition for high performing schools
25
BUILDING SHARED UNDERSTANDING
Group Discussion:How will you roll out the Report Card to
your staff? To your community?
Who are your key stakeholders?What will you communicate? How will you communicate?
26
LET US KNOW HOW WE CAN HELP
Sept 18th and Oct 3rd – more in depth trainings here on the Report Card and communication strategies.
Questions?Kevin Anderson – [email protected]
Nicole Barlass – [email protected]