Route 9 Corridor Improvement Project€¦ · 06/07/2018  · • Transit Signal Priority...

1 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/2017 – MassDOT District 2

Route 9 Corridor Improvement Project Stakeholder Meeting

April 24, 2017– MassDOT District 2

2 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2

Agenda

• Welcome & Introductions • Since We Last Met

• Transit Mobility Alternatives Report Findings • Transit Improvements Next Steps • Route 9 (Middle to South Maple) Project Update

• Transit Signal Priority Implementation

3 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2

Project Team

MassDOT’s Highway Division Responsible for Administering the Project Development Phase

Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. Planning, Design & Engineering

Howard Stein Hudson Public Involvement

Toole Design Group Alternatives Analysis & Planning

4 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2

Agency Partners

5 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/2017 – MassDOT District 2

Since We Last Met

6 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2

Meetings and Ongoing Process

• Last Stakeholder Meeting – July 13, 2016

• Hadley Board of Selectmen – September 7, 2016

• Completed Transit Modeling

7 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/2017 – MassDOT District 2

Transit Mobility Alternatives Report Findings

8 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2

B43 Transit Mobility Overview

NORTHAMPTON

HADLEY

AMHERST

9 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2

B43 Transit Mobility Existing

10 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2

B-43 Existing Travel Times

11 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2

B-43 Delay Hotspots

12 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2

B43 Transit Mobility Recommended Alternative

• Mixed-flow BRT system • Reroute along 116 / Terminate at

Haigis Mall • Transit Signal Priority system-wide • Stop consolidation • Move stops curbside at Malls and

UMass • Enhanced stops

13 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2

B43 Transit Mobility Recommended Alternative

• Aerial of Proposed B43 Route – Consolidation of bus stops, suggested rerouting – Recommendations from UMass – Recommendations from PVTA

14 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2

Bus Route and Stop Consolidation

15 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2

Rapid Bus Design Assumptions

• Mixed-flow running ways • Low-floor articulated

buses • Branded buses and stops • Transit Signal Priority (TSP) • Attractive stops /

passenger amenities • Ticketing kiosks at major

stops • Frequent all-day service

16 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2

Transit Mobility Improvements at a Glance

• Transit Travel Time: 26% to 30% faster • Ridership Projections: 41.5% increase @ 15 min.

64.7% increase @ 10 min.

Feature Existing Rapid Bus

Route Miles 10.4 Miles 9 Miles

Number of Stops 54 Stops 30 Stops

Average Stop Spacing

0.3 Miles 0.5 Miles

17 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2

Travel Time Modeling Results

18 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2

Ridership Estimates

19 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2

Ridership Estimates

• Estimates based on TCRP Report 118 methodology – Determines ridership boost based on variety of BRT factors

(off-board fare collection, separate ROW, etc.) – Maximum BRT elasticity of 0.25 (if all elements achieved,

maximum ridership boost of 25%)

20 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2

Ridership Estimates

• Two scenarios considered: 1. One with 10 minute service or better, and off-

board fare collection 2. One without either

• Service frequency slightly more highly weighted in the model

21 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/2017 – MassDOT District 2

Transit Improvements Next Steps

22 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2

I-91 Interchange 19

23 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2

Other MassDOT Projects

• Sidewalk & Wheelchair Ramp Construction on Route 9 – from South Maple Street / Route

116 to Amherst Town Line – Advertisement July 2017 – Construction: 1 year, start date

9/18/2017

• West Street Pedestrian Signals – 2 HAWK signals – District Office designing

No. 608023

No. 606547

24 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2

Streetscape and Station Design

25 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2

Streetscape and Station Design

26 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2

Streetscape and Station Design

27 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2

Streetscape and Station Design

28 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2

Branded Routes

29 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/2017 – MassDOT District 2

Route 9 (Middle to South Maple) Project Update

30 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2

Project Area

31 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2

Street Design Section

32 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2

Project Schedule 25% Design Submittal Summer 2017

Design Public Hearing Winter 2017/2018

Anticipated Advertisement 2020-2021

Draft State Transportation Improvements Program 2020

33 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2

TSP Implementation for PVTA Blue Route 43 MassDOT Project # 608786

Initial Project Meeting

34 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2

1 Improved schedule adherence TSP O B J E C T I V E S Improved transit

travel t ime eff ic iency 2

Minimize impacts to normal traff ic operations

3

35 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2

What is Transit Signal Priority?

According to Transit Signal Priority: A Planning and Implementation Handbook TSP is an operational strategy that facilitates the movement of transit vehicles, either buses or streetcars, through traffic signal controlled intersections. Signal priority should not be confused with signal pre-emption, which while similar (and the terms are often used synonymous), they are in fact different processes. Source: Transit Signal Priority: A Planning and Implementation Handbook, May 2005, US DOT

36 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2

TSP Functional Applications

Vehicle Detection

Priority Request Generator/Server

Priority Control Strategies

TSP System Management

1

2

3

4

37 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2

Vehicle Detection Systems

38 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2

Optical

- Most common technology - In use since late 1960’s - Three components:

1. Optical Emitter on buses 2. Optical Detector at signal 3. Phase selector in cabinet

39 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2

GPS Technology

- Functionally similar to optical systems

- Can use location and speed data to apply TSP as bus approaches an intersection

- Line-of-sight not required - No additional infrastructure

(can be mounted in controller cabinet)

- GPS device required on vehicles, detection equipment at intersections

40 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2

GPS vs. Optical Functionality

41 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2

GPS vs. Optical – Comparable Costs

* Costs shown are Rough Order of Magnitude Cost

42 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2

Existing Equipment Intersection Town Jurisdiction Controller Model Software Version

Route 9 at John Green Ped Northampton Northampton Peek ATCGREENWave 03.014.2511Linux 2.6.20.14 Ver #132 PREEMPT

Route 9 at Bedford Terrace Northampton Northampton Peek ATCGREENWave 03.014.2511Linux 2.6.20.14 Ver #132 PREEMPT

Route 9 at Route 66 Northampton Northampton Peek ATCGREENWave 03.014.2511Linux 2.6.20.14 Ver #132 PREEMPT

Route 9 at Route 10 Northampton Northampton Peek ATCGREENWave 03.014.2511Linux 2.6.20.14 Ver #132 PREEMPT

Route 9 at Pleasant St Northampton Northampton Peek ATCGREENWave 03.014.2511Linux 2.6.20.14 Ver #132 PREEMPT

Route 9 at Market and Hawley Northampton Northampton Peek ATCGREENWave 03.014.2511Linux 2.6.20.14 Ver #132 PREEMPT

Route 9 at Day Ave (Ped) Northampton MassDOT TCT LMD 8000 0807170 Rev 8ERoute 9 at I-91 Ramps/Damon Rd Northampton MassDOT Econolite ASC/3-1000Route 9 at Bay Road Hadley MassDOT Econolite ASC 3-21--Route 9 at Route 47 Hadley MassDOT Peek 3000 E 8216A 3.7.3 build 420Route 9 at East Street Hadley MassDOT Peek 3000 E 8216A 3.7.3 build 420Route 9 at Lowes Hadley MassDOT Peek 3000 E 8216A 3.6.6 Build 166Route 9 at Home Depot Hadley MassDOT Peek 3000 E 8216A 3.6.6 Build 166Route 9 at Maple Street Hadley MassDOT Peek 3000 E 8216A Route 9 at CineMark Hadley MassDOT Peek 3000 E 8216A 3.6.8 Build 412Route 9 at Route 116 - Hadley Hadley MassDOT Peek 3000 E 8216A 3.6.3 Build 371Route 9 at Windfield Estates Hadley MassDOT Peek 3000 E 8216A Route 9 at University Drive Amherst MassDOT Peek 3000 8216A 3.6.8 Build 412University Dr at Big Y Amherst Amherst Naztec 980-A2300-1 v61.4gUniversity Dr at Amity St Amherst Amherst Eagele EPAC 3108M34 3.32fUniversity Dr at Mass Ave Amherst UMASS Gammatronix Dial ControllerMassachusetts Avenue at Commonwealth Avenue Amherst UMASS Eagle EPAC M50 3.34gMassachusetts Avenue at North Pleasant St Amherst UMASS Eagle EPAC M50 3.34gTriangle St at East Pleasant St Amherst Amherst Naztec 980-A1300-1 v61.2sNorth Pleasaant Street at Kellogg St Amherst Amherst Eagele EPAC 3608M41 3.32oPleasant Street at Amity Street and Main Street Amherst Amherst Eagele EPAC 3608M41 3.32fRoute 9 at Route 116 - Amherst Amherst Amherst Eagele EPAC 3608M41 3.33e

43 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2

Existing Equipment

44 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2

Existing Equipment Inventory performed as part of Route 9 Project

45 Stakeholder Meeting – 4/24/17 – MassDOT District 2

Next Steps

Identify Design Committee • PVTA • MassDOT • Emergency Services

Develop Equipment Needs • Controllers • GPS • OPTICAL

Design & Construction

Maintenance Responsibility