REVISION ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION ... · 34 Conclusion Revision reconstruction of...

11

C.K. Yiannakopoulos, PJ Fules,C.K. Yiannakopoulos, PJ Fules,

R. Goddard, MAS MowbrayR. Goddard, MAS Mowbray

Department of Orthopaedics, Mayday University Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics, Mayday University Hospital, London, UKLondon, UK

REVIS ION ANTERIOR CRUCIATE REVIS ION ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONS TRUCTION LIGAMENT RECONS TRUCTION

FOLLOWING S YNTHETIC LIGAMENT FOLLOWING S YNTHETIC LIGAMENT FAILURE US ING HAMS TRING TENDONSFAILURE US ING HAMS TRING TENDONS

22

Background Background

Increasing number of primary ACL reconstructions leads to increase of revision

replacements

The incidence of graft failure following primary ACL replacements is 0.7 – 8 %

Restoration of the normal knee kinematics is a challenge after failed ACL

ligament replacement

Results of revision ACL reconstruction are not as favorable as primary ACL

replacements

With every surgical procedure the anatomical and technical conditions become

worse

33

General Problems at Revision ACL General Problems at Revision ACL ReplacementReplacement

Poor placement of the graft leading to impingement

Anteriorly placed femoral tunnel

Inappropriate graft length with loss of motion

Tunnel enlargement needing bone grafting

Intraosseous metal fixation devices removal +/- bone grafting

Staged procedures

44

IntroductionIntroduction

At Mayday University Hospital London 1992 to 2000 29 procedures

Isolated ACL Revisions were carried out following failed previous ABC prosthetic ligament reconstruction

55

Database Database Total No of ACL Revisions 29

Replacement with Prosthetic ABC ligament 5 Autograft 24

Quadriceps Tendon Graft 2

Patellar Bone Tendon Bone Graft 1 Four Strand Hamstring Graft 21

66

Orthopaedic PrinciplesOrthopaedic Principlesof Mayday ACL Revision Replacement of Mayday ACL Revision Replacement

TechniqueTechnique

Double Incision Arthroscopically Guided Operation

Permanent Strong 4 Strand STG BH Polyester Soffix Complex

“Straight through” Low Stress Placement

Impingement Free Tibial Tunnel with Mayday Jig

Grooved “Over the Top” Femoral Siting

Tibial Tunnel Edge Chamfering

Firm Monocortical Bollard Fixation

77

Materials & MethodsMaterials & Methods

Algorithm for ACL Revision replacement

Return of Subjective Instability – Giving Way

KT 2000 Assessment & Physical Examination

Arthroscopy – Tightening / Removal

Physiotherapy

Autologous ACL Revision Replacement

88

Failed ABC Ligament

99

Revision ACL S TG ReplacementRevision ACL S TG Replacement

Removal of Removal of failed failed ABCABC

LigamentLigament

1010

ACL S TG Replacement ACL S TG Replacement Hamstring HarvestingHamstring Harvesting

Surgical Approach STG Preparation / Stripping

1111

ACL S TG Replacement ACL S TG Replacement

Hamstring Harvesting

1212

ACL S TG Replacement ACL S TG Replacement

Harvested STG Tendons with Mayday BH Soffix

1313

Mayday BH Polyester S offix Mayday BH Polyester S offix

Mayday BH Soffix on Frame

1414

S TG / S offix Complex S TG / S offix Complex Tendon Braiding & Fixation with Ethibond Tendon Braiding & Fixation with Ethibond

S uturesS utures

1515

4 S trand S TG Mayday BH S offix Complex

1616

Tibial Tunnel Placement with Mayday Jig

Mayday Jig Jig Placement into the Intercondylar Notch

1717

Mayday Jig in use X ray

1818

1919

Check the Guide WireCheck the Guide Wire

Position of Guide wire Arthroscopic view

2020

Re-Drilling of the Tibial Tunnel

Cross sectional MR from Re-Drilled Tibial Tunnel

2121

Tunnel Edge Radiusing & Chamfering

Back Radius Cutter Position on AP & Lateral X-ray

2222

Preconditioning Preconditioning of the Graft-S offix Complex of the Graft-S offix Complex

With 2-300 N Maximum Manual Pulling Force

2323

Pulling the Graft into the Tibial Pulling the Graft into the Tibial TunnelTunnel

2424

Distal & Proximal Fixation at 15° Knee Distal & Proximal Fixation at 15° Knee Flexion With 50 N Manual Pulling ForceFlexion With 50 N Manual Pulling Force

Proximal Femoral Proximal Femoral Bollard FixationBollard Fixation

Distal Tibial Bollard Distal Tibial Bollard FixationFixation

2525

Graft in S traight Through final “Over the Top” Graft in S traight Through final “Over the Top” Position Position

Coronal & Lateral MR Scan from 4 Strand STG ACL GraftCoronal & Lateral MR Scan from 4 Strand STG ACL Graft

2626

Early RehabilitationEarly Rehabilitation

Brace Wearing in Full Extension for 2 weeks

Early Full Weight Bearing

Closed Chain Exercises for 3 month

Jogging over 4 month

Return to full activity, cutting & contact sports over 1 year

2727

Results

Male : 25

Female : 4

Average Age at Follow-up (Years) : 36

Range (Years) : 25-51

Mean Total Follow up Time: 34 Months (4-80)

2828

S ubjective AssessmentS ubjective Assessment

Modified Lysholm Scoring System

Tegner Activity Scoring System

IKDC Patient’s Subjective scoring

2929

Objective AssessmentObjective Assessment

Lachmann’s Test

Pivot Shift Test

Instrumented Measurement (KT 2000 Arthrometer Side to Side Difference, SSD)

3030

ResultsTegner Activity S coringTegner Activity S coring

Pre-inj Pre-op Present

Tegner Score

7,6

2,57

5

0

2

4

6

8

10

Different catagories of Tegner scoring

Teg

ner

Sco

re

Pre-injPre-opPresent

3131

ResultsResults

IKDC S coreIKDC S core

3232

KT 2000 ArthrometerKT 2000 Arthrometer

Total mean KT-2000 Measurement

SSD 1.70 mm +/- 1.64 SD

17

3 31

02468

10121416182022

A B C D

0-2 mm

2-3 mm

3-5mm

=>5mm

3333

Pivot S hiftP ivot S hift

Negative 21 Glide +/- 7 Frank 1

Total 29

3434

ConclusionConclusion Revision reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament can provide improvement in function and stability in the short to medium term

The outcome following revision surgery is not as satisfactory as that the following primary procedure.

We feel that highly accurate low stress, straight through placement of the tibial tunnel and over- the-top routing of the reconstruction avoiding the complications associated with re-drilling the femoral tunnel is the best routing for this type of surgery.

3535

ConclusionConclusion

Our technique has the advantage of being relatively easy to

perform in what is otherwise difficult surgery.

Use of a double looped hamstring tendon graft device can restore

stability to the knee following failure of the primary reconstruction

and even good results can be obtained in the short term in the

multiply re-operated knee.

3636

Thank you for your Thank you for your attentionattention