Report of the 5th AIPA · Web viewReport of the 9 th AIPA Caucus INTRODUCTION The 9th ASEAN...

ASEAN INTER-PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY (AIPA)THE 9THAIPA CAUCUS

Jakarta, Indonesia, 17th– 20thJuly 2017

Report of the 9th AIPA Caucus

INTRODUCTION

1. The 9th ASEAN Inter-Parliamentary Assembly (AIPA) Caucus met from 17 to 20 July 2017 at Fairmont Hotel in Jakarta, Republic of Indonesia.

2. The main agenda of the 9th AIPA Caucus were:(i) Discussion on the progress made by each AIPA Member

Parliament in the Status of Implementation of the Resolutions adopted at the 37th AIPA General Assembly in Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar;

(ii) Working Group discussion on Regional Maritime Cooperation;

(iii) Working Group discussion on Peaceful Resolution to Conflicts;

(iv) Working Group discussion on Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES);

(v) Special Session on Developing AIPA Capacity.

LIST OF DELEGATES

3. The 9th AIPA Caucus was attended by 73delegates consisting of 35 members of parliaments and parliamentary staffsfrom 9 AIPA Member Parliaments, AIPA Secretary General and staffs of AIPA Secretariat, representatives from ASEAN Secretariat and Permanent Representative of Thailand to ASEAN, also representatives from Freeland, GIZ-ASEAN Secretariat and USAID. Delegation from the Parliament of the Philippines was unable to attend the meeting and was represented by Her Excellency the Philippine Ambassador to Indonesia.(List of delegates is attached as Annex A)

COURTESY CALL TO H.E. DR. FADLI ZON, VICE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA

4. Prior to the commencement of the Ninth AIPA Caucus, the Head of Delegations of AIPA Member Parliaments and AIPA Secretary General called on H.E. Dr. Fadli Zon, Vice Speaker of the House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia at the Peacock Lounge, Fairmont Hotel at 08.00 a.m. on Tuesday, 18 July 2017.

5. On behalf of the House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia, H.E.Fadli Zon warmly welcomed the head of delegations and AIPA Secretary General. He further expressed his sincere gratitude for their attendance. He expected for the meeting to run smoothly and provide a contribution towards the creation of ASEAN Community.

6. The Head of Delegations expressed their appreciation to H.E. Fadli Zon and the House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia for hosting the 9th AIPA Caucus. They expressed their willingness to actively participate in the meetings.

OFFICIAL OPENING CEREMONY

7. The official opening ceremony of the 9th AIPA Caucus commenced at 8:40 a.m. on Tuesday, 18 July 2017 at the Ballroom 3 Fairmont Hotel, Jakarta.

8. National Anthem of Republic of Indonesia “Indonesia Raya” was echoed, followed by the AIPA Anthem.

9. Hon. Mr. Isra Sunthornvut, Secretary General of AIPA delivered his welcome remarks. In his remarks, he highlighted that one of the purpose of this AIPA Caucus is to celebrate the 40 th year of its existence. Therefore, it is time for AIPA to make transition, move forward and become more relevant to ASEAN. The ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) has been implemented for the last 1.5 years.AIPA is expected to become the view of the ASEAN people to make AEC stronger. He underlined that AIPA should be the main voice of ASEAN people’s opinion and expression. He hoped that AIPA will keep moving forward and transforming to become pro-active and become the true voice of ASEAN community. He also emphasized that AIPA’s transformation is an evolving process that needs further attention from AIPA parliamentarians as the voice of stakeholders of the people of ASEAN.

10. H.E. Dr. Fadli Zon, Vice Speaker of the House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia, delivered his opening address and thereafter declared the 9th AIPA Caucus Meeting to convene. In his remarks, H.E. Dr. Fadli Zon highlighted that the 9th AIPA Caucus is a crucial mechanism to ensure concerted efforts in implementing the commitments made in the General Assembly. He acknowledged a significant development progress made in ASEAN and highlighted the important contribution of parliament in creating ASEAN Community. He also emphasized the significance of the 9th

AIPA Caucus Meeting, Strengthening Maritime Cooperation and

Peaceful Resolution to Conflicts in ASEAN to ensure regional security and stability, particularly considering the flows of illicit drugs, weapons, and human trafficking along the Southeast Asian waters. He appreciated the development of democratic reform in the region, while also stressed that challenges remain.He also valued the establishments of AIPA initiatives, including the cooperation held by AIPA and the ASEAN Wildlife Enforcement Network (ASEAN-WEN) which seek regular deliberation of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) in AIPA Caucus.Further, he briefly explained that a special session on developing AIPA Capacity will be held to seek a preliminary guidance and vision on the future of AIPA as an inseparable part of the ASEAN Community. He reiterated the role of AIPA in law and policy harmonization and in this regard, to pursue regional mechanism for stronger foundation in the creation of equal economic opportunities and prosperity for the people of ASEAN.(The remarks is attached as Annex B)

11. Pursuant to Article I.(5) of Terms of Reference of the AIPA Caucus, the House of Representatives of Republic of Indonesia nominated H.E. Dr. Fadli Zon, Vice Speaker of the House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia, as the Chairperson of the 9th AIPA Caucus. The meeting agreed to the nomination.

FIRST PLENARY SESSION

12. The first plenary session of the 9th AIPA Caucus was held at 09:45 a.m. on Tuesday, 18 July 2017 at Ballroom 3, Fairmont Hotel Jakarta. The meeting was chaired by H.E. Dr. Fadli Zon.

13. Pursuant to Article I.(6) of Terms of Reference of the AIPA Caucus, the Chairperson of the 9th AIPA Caucus nominated Hon. Ms. Htoot May of the Union Assembly of Myanmar, as Vice

Chairperson of the 9th AIPA Caucus. The meeting supported the nomination.

14. The Chairperson informed the meeting that Hon. Mr. Isra Sunthornvut, Secretary General of AIPA, is the Secretary of the 9th AIPA Caucus.

15. The Chairperson invited the Heads of Delegations to introduce their delegates attending the 9th AIPA Caucus.

16. The meeting considered and adopted the Agenda and Program of Activities of the 9th AIPA Caucus.(TheAgenda and Program of Activities are attached as Annex C)

17. The Chairperson informed the meeting that the House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia nominated the following names to chair the Working Group Meetings and the Special Session:

1. Hon. Mr. Juliari Batubara for the Working Group 1: Discussion on Regional Maritime Cooperation.

2. Hon. Mr. Dave Akbarshah Fikarno for the Working Group 2: Discussion on Peaceful Resolution to Conflicts.

3. Hon. Mr. Syaifullah Tamliha for the Working Group 3: Discussion on CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora).

4. H.E. Mr. Fahri Hamzah for the Special Session on Developing AIPA Capacity.

The meeting supported the nomination.

18. AIPA Member Delegations were invited to present their respective reports on the Status of the Implementation of the 37th AIPA General Assembly Resolutions.

Under Political Matters, the 37th AIPA General Assembly adopted 5 (five) resolutions, including the following 3 (three) resolutions that should be implemented by AIPA Member Parliaments:a) Resolving Internal and External Challenges Through Democratic

Process and Achieving Peace and Stability Through Consultation, Consensus, and Negotiation;

b) Strengthening Cooperation to Ensure Cyber security in ASEAN; and

c) Enhancing Maritime Security Cooperation and Protection of Marine Resources in ASEAN;

Upon which AIPA Member Parliaments encouraged ASEAN Member States to intensify their joint efforts in implementing the UN 2030 Development Agenda. AIPA also urged ASEAN Leaders and AIPA Member Parliaments to keep the region free from nuclear weapons. AIPA also urged ASEAN to set up a common legal framework to ensure cybersecurity and to prevent cybercrime and transnational crime in the region. AIPA also supported the adoption of internationally accepted maritime conventions and principles in supporting marine ecosystem conservation and restoration.

Under Economic Matters, the 37th AIPA General Assembly adopted 3 (three) resolutions as follows:a) Creating Job Opportunities and Decent Working Conditions in

the Process of Enhancing Sustainable Economic Development;b) Strengthening the Growth of Micro, Small and Medium

Enterprises (MSMEs) in Entering and Optimizing the Global Value Chains by Improving Access to Finance and Technology, and Enhancing Productivity and Innovation; and

c) Parliamentary Support for ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) Implementation;

Upon which AIPA Member Parliaments agreed to creating an enabling policy and a legal framework based on international labour conventions to protect worker’s rights, eliminate all kinds of abuse and against discrimination in the work place and facilitate the trans-border movement of workers. Recognizing the important role of Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) as major economic generator in ASEAN, AIPA Member Parliaments urged ASEAN Governments to issue policies in facilitating and supporting MSMEs to increase the competitiveness of national and regional economies. AIPA also encouraged AIPA Member Parliaments to accelerate policy harmonization to support the implementation of ASEAN Economic Community Blueprint 2025.

Under Social Matters, the 37th AIPA General Assembly adopted 4 (four) resolutions as follows:a) Strengthening Cooperation among AIPA Member Parliaments

on Preparedness and Response to Zika Virus Infection;b) Strengthening Cooperation among AIPA Member Parliaments

on the Implementation of Plan of Action to Materialize ASEAN Declaration on Strengthening Social Protection;

c) Enhancing Cooperation in Response to Climate Change in ASEAN; and

d) Sustainable Tourism;

Upon which AIPA Member Parliaments agreed to request AIPA member states to institutionalize community-based programs, to activate national preparedness and response mechanisms, and to establish ASEAN Public Health Alert Centre. AIPA Member Parliaments decided to encourage ASEAN Member States to invest more resources to materialize the ASEAN Declaration on Strengthening Social Protection. AIPA Member Parliaments also agreed to establish Centres for Climate Change Assistance and Research to enhance cooperation and assistance on disaster preparedness, relief and rehabilitation. On sustainable tourism,

AIPA encouraged its Member Parliaments to formulate strict environmental policy for the conservation of natural resources and cultural heritage.

Under WAIPA Matters, the 37th AIPA General Assembly adopted 3 (three) resolutions, including the following 2 (two) resolutions that should be implemented by AIPA Member Parliaments:a) Decent Work for Women in ASEAN by Promoting Social

Protection and Equal Opportunity; andb) Extending the Maternity Benefits of Working Women in ASEAN;

Upon which AIPA Member Parliaments recognized the urgency of ensuring the rights of migrant workers, unpaid and low paid workers; and agreed to enhance law enforcement in accordance to international conventions, regional agreements, national laws and policies related to labour issues. AIPA Member Parliaments also encouraged ASEAN Member States to implement appropriate policies in supporting maternity protection and to adhere to international standards on extending maternity protection.

The presentations of the reports are highlighted hereunder:

Political MattersBrunei prioritizes the creation of a peaceful region free from the cause of inter-state conflict and upholding peaceful resolution to conflicts. Brunei is in the process of establishing a government agency for cyber security. Brunei has implemented international instruments to address security threats and take preventive measures against incidents.

Cambodia promotes decentralization priorities for national reform. Cambodia will develop high quality service in information technology to enable better control in cyber security. Peace and stability is among the priorities mentioned in the fifth legislature of

the National Assembly (2014-2018). In maritime, Cambodia has formulated Maritime Code in Maritime Transport.

Indonesia is committed to democratic institutional building, including through the war on corruption. Indonesia encouraged the ratification of international instruments for the suppression of nuclear weapons and weapons of mass destruction. Indonesia in 2017 is in the process of establishing the State Cyber and Cypher Agency to promote the development of a resilient and secure cyber ecosystem. In maritime security, Indonesia has taken several initiatives to improve maritime security in the ASEAN waters through coordinated patrols. Indonesia has also ratified several international conventions on maritime security.

In 2015, Lao PDR amended its national constitution and in May 2017 it has amended the Law on Public Security Forces, aimed to strengthen democracy and promoting peace and unity between multi-ethnic people and provide greater support for Lao PDR’s integration to the global community. Lao PDR has adopted several laws to combat cyber-crime, including the law on data protection.

Malaysia has passed several laws to improve national security, including to prevent terrorism, crime act and security offenses. Malaysia is involved in the ongoing discussion on the Framework of Conduct in the South China Sea. The Ministry of Science and Technology Information through Cyber Security Malaysia, which also collaborates with international agencies, has implemented initiatives to enhance cyber security capacity. Malaysia supports and contributes in the discussion of maritime issues under ASEAN-led mechanism and respects the MoU of Common Guidelines.

Myanmar has actively participated in various regional and international mechanisms to improve global and regional security, including the ARF seminar held on 19-23 June 2017 which was co-

chaired by EU, USA and Myanmar. Myanmar has ratified the CTBT on 21 September 2016, also acceded in other international conventions on nuclear safety. In ASEAN, Myanmar upholds ASEAN’s agreement to enhance regional maritime security. Currently, Myanmar is in the process of drafting the cyber law to setup a common legal framework, prevent cybercrime and transnational crimes.

The Philippines has enacted laws on amnesty for individuals involved in past political conflicts. Law to prevent cyber bullying has also been adopted. The Philippines formulated a House Bill on Chemical Weapons Prohibition Act to prohibit the development, production, stockpiling, and use of chemical weapons. In 2012, several bills have been filed for the enactment of Maritime Code.

Singapore in April 2017 passed the computer misuse and cyber security amendment bill which include criminalizing personal data theft. Singapore has also adopted a law to prevent the transfer of harmful marine species and pathogens from one marine environment to another. The prevention of pollution of the sea is among the priorities accommodated in its national laws.

Viet Nam has issued the Decision 898 to improve national mechanism for cyber security, including on electronic transactions. Viet Nam continues to enhance technical regulation and assessment for cyber security.

Economic MattersBrunei focuses on human capital development through robust educational system relevant to the needs of the job market. Brunei will continue to create sound economic environment for business and investments. Both local and migrant workers in Brunei are regulated under the Labour Act, promoting the protection of the rights of workers. Brunei drives human capital development to

enable Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) to succeed, including assisting MSMEs to take part in both regional and international markets.

Creating jobs and improving working condition are the long term goals for Cambodia. Both technical and vocational education will be enhanced to improve the skill of the future workers as required in a globalized world. Cambodia also committed to promote the development of SMEs and optimizing the role of SMEs in the global value chain by improving access in financing and conducting reforms in the commercial procedure for SMEs. Cambodia integration into the sub-regional and regional community mechanism will provide more opportunities to enhance its economic capabilities.

Indonesia has signed the Indonesia Jobs Pact, a national adoption of the ILO Global Jobs Pact. Indonesia has also ratified eight ILO fundamental conventions. Indonesia is committed to improve the work option for people in rural areas. Indonesia supports the implementation of ASEAN Strategic Action Plan for SME Development (SAP SMED) 2016-2025 to promote MSMEs competitiveness. The Indonesian House of Representatives has established a Working Group on ASEAN Economic Community, which also focuses on SMEs development.

Lao PDR has adopted the national socio-economic development plan and amended the Law on Education to promote employment and vocational skills development, including encouraging the use of English language. Lao PDR has also amended Law on Investment Promotion to support MSMEs and provide incentives in many areas of technological and rural development. Lao PDR is committed to improve its infrastructure to provide better connectivity in regional integration.

Malaysia is committed to maintain full employment rate and new job creations by providing up-skilling, re-skilling and multi-skilling programs. Malaysia established the Special Innovation Unit (UNIK) under the Prime Minister’s Department to assist SMEs in innovation. Malaysia supports the proposal for adequate budget to promote and implement the AEC. The AEC Blueprint 2015 has been successfully implemented in the country.

Myanmar enacted the Settlement of Labour Dispute Law to encourage good relationship between employers and workers. Several other regulations have been adopted to promote better working condition, including the legal framework on minimum wage.

Several laws and regulations have been adopted in the Philippines to promote labour protection in the private sector, informal economy, and outsourced workers. The Philippines is committed to promote, develop and assist MSMEs through the creation of a development council, and the rationalization of government assistance programs and agencies. ASEAN Integration Plan Act has also been adopted to ensure the successful implementation of AEC.

Singapore has various programs to help SMEs build up their capabilities in the digital world, also exercise efforts to increase their productivity and innovation capacity. Singapore is committed to improve trade facilitation in the region as an inseparable part of regional economic integration.

Thailand continuouslyreviews and enhances domestic laws to promote tangible and sustainable working environment. Thailand supports SME development in accordance to the ASEAN Action Plan and encourages the acceleration of theASEANsingle window.

Viet Nam is one of world’s top countries with low unemployment rate. Viet Nam has implemented several policies to develop vocational training and improve salary systems. Trained workers in Viet Nam reached 53% or nearly 1.5 million people. In 2016, Viet Nam focused on building and improving institutions, mechanism, and policies to improve SMEs’ competitiveness. As many as 50 Decrees have been amended to improve business condition.Viet Nam continues to strive for creating a sound business environment to ensure uniform standards in accordance to the AEC Blueprint, including through the adoption of Investment Law, Bankruptcy Law, Enterprise Law, and SMEs Law.

Social MattersBrunei strengthened its capacity to prevent, detect and control Zika virus. Brunei provides social protection for its people, including health insurance, pension scheme and housing program. Brunei is targeting a 63% of reduction in total energy consumption by 2035. As many as 58% of the country’s land areais dedicated to forest conservation program.

Rapid response team in detecting and addressing the spread of Zika virus has been launched. Cambodia will continue to improve its social security service through a more interconnected and coordinated system. Cambodia has established a national committee for coordinating national climate change responses. Cambodia has established relevant laws for managing tourism industries, including regulations on tourist entertainment management, protection of cultural heritage, and tourism safety.

The Indonesian Health Authority is encouraged to enhance its capacity for emergency situation and health preparedness for all communicable diseases including the Zika virus. Indonesia has established two social security agencies providing social protection in health and employment. Indonesia has established the Peatland

Restoration Agency in 2016 to restore the degraded peatland ecosystem. Indonesia has ratified the Paris Agreement in 2016. Indonesia is committed to improve eco-tourism industry through incentive programs.

Lao PDR’s Ministry of Health has formulated guidance in response to Zika virus and established an emergency number (166). Lao PDR is committed to provide poor families in rural areas with better access to financial services. Lao has ratified the Paris Agreement in 2016 to effectively protect its environment and to address the challenges of climate change. The Parliament supported the National Guideline on Sustainable Tourism Development.

Ministry of Health Malaysia had established Special Force Team at all levels. Malaysia has also introduced the Zika surveillance system and established the National Zika Experts Committee. Malaysia formed the Malaysian Social Protection Council to formulate Social Protection Policy. A number of programs have been introduced, including the Self Employed Social Security Scheme, 1 AZAM program to create income opportunities for low income households, and cash payments for families. Malaysia has ratified the Paris Agreement and established the Green Climate Fund and Cooperation Relation with ASEAN Member States. Malaysia has formulated and adopted numerous policies on ecotourism, also in accordance to ASEAN Tourism Standards.

Myanmar is continuously improving social security measures to provide better living condition for its people.

The Philippines has applied several measures to prevent Zika virus infection. Bill on Occupational Safety has also been adopted to promote better working condition. National Health Insurance System has been implemented as a form of providing Social Protection for its people. Facing the risks of climate change, the

main objective for the Philippines is to promote the creation of resilient communities through continuous adaptation.Through Tourism Act 2009, sustainable tourism has become one of the priorities to be developed in the Philippines.

Singapore supports ASEAN’s initiative to take appropriate measures to manage health risks through research and sharing of new knowledge and best practices.

Thailand is committed to promote tangible and sustainable result under the principle of universal protection of labour. Thailand supports the proposal of creating a suitable ecosystem for the development of SMEs to accelerate the ASEAN Single Window. AIPA Member Parliaments should review internal laws to ensure that the people enjoy better quality of life under the implementation of AEC. Thailand provides assistances to job seekers who are willing to work abroad, also pay close attention to the disabled and elderly. Thailand promotes itself as a developed tourism destination.

Viet Namhas enacted national legal framework on preventive medicine, in particular to prevent the infection of Zika virus. Around 30% of the national budget is allocated for health measures.Viet Namwill continue to promote the improvement of social security to match the international treaties ratified by the National Assembly.Viet Nam has applied several policies on climate change mitigation, including on environmental protection and energy efficiency. Ecotourism in Viet Nam has brought a considerable income. Viet Nam has adopted the Law on Tourists.

WAIPA MattersWomen in Brunei have attained high positions in various professional fields. Women participation in the work force has

increased from 59% to 70%. Both women and men civil servants have now received fringe benefits. Maternity leave is entitled to 105 days as opposed to 56 days prior to 2011, encouraging better breastfeeding and appropriate care.

Cambodia is committed to implement gender mainstreaming within government ministries, including by supporting women to hold high-rank positions in government agencies. Cambodia will continue to improve maternal health facilities, including promoting maternal and child health. Cambodia has exercised its best efforts to implement all 37th AIPA Resolutions.

Indonesia has ratified several international legal instruments to promote equal opportunity at the work place and the protection of migrant workers. Maternity benefits in Indonesia have been expanded not only through maternal leave regulation but also in the protection of work for women during pregnancy period.

Lao PDR has adopted a law to prevent trafficking in persons which has been translated into national policies on child labour.Lao PDR has also adopted a law on civil servant which regulates maternal benefits for working women.

Malaysia has implemented Gender Mainstreaming policy and applied a 30% minimum quota for women at Decision-Making Position both in Public Sector and Corporate. Malaysia has improved maternal benefits for working women through several regulations, including the Employment Act, Labour Ordinance, Public Service Circular on Maternity Leave Benefits, and National Family Policy.

Myanmar is trying to amend the Overseas Employment Law to ensure gender equality and to provide better complain mechanism. Since 2012, Myanmar has applied the Social Security Law to

provide better maternity benefits for working women, including the right to take free medical treatment at certain hospitals and clinics in case of pregnancy.

Viet Nam is a party to various international legal instruments on gender equality. Viet Nam government supports young women to improve their skills in various subjects and to enable them to ease the families’ burden. Female workers accounted to 48% of the national labour force. Viet Nam continues to develop laws on effective maternity policies to enhance father’s responsibility in child care and underlines the importance of sharing responsibility between parents in the family.

(Reports on the Status of the Implementation of the 37th AIPA General Assembly Resolutions by each Member Parliament are attached as Annex D)

To conclude, with regard to the status implementation of the 37th

AIPA GA Resolutions:

In Political Matters,AIPA Member Parliaments have exercised their utmost efforts to provide positive contribution in the creation of a peaceful region. The democratization process has continued to accelerate national reforms. With regard to the challenges of globalization, several ASEAN Member States have established national agencies to improve cyber security measures. Maritime security has become one of the major issues pertinent to the creation of regional security. Several initiatives have been taken to improve maritime security in ASEAN, one of which is through coordinated patrols. AIPA Member Parliaments have also continued to advancing their national legislations through the ratification of international legal instruments onsecurity matters.

In Economic Matters, AIPA Member Parliaments in general have similar views on the importance of human capital development through the creation of a more relevant educational system, in accordance to the needs of the job market, including by advancing the quality of both technical and vocational education. AIPA Member Parliaments also committed to create sound economic environment for businesses and investments as the core foundation of the successful establishment of the ASEAN Economic Community. The Delegates have also continued to adjust their national legislations to protect the rights of workers and to promote better working condition. All Delegates shared a particular concern and commitment to the development of MSMEs, including improving financial access for SMEs; assisting SMEs in utilizing digital technology; improving SMEs capabilities in innovation; advancing the quality of human resources to improve SMEs competitiveness, and assisting SMEs to be involved in the global value chain.

In Social Matters, AIPA Member Parliaments have supported the governments of ASEAN Member States to strengthen national capacityinpreventing, detecting and controlling the infection and the spread of Zika virus. Social protection measures have continued to become a focal point in sustainable development targets of ASEAN Member States. Though may take different forms, AIPA Member Parliaments have exercised their highest efforts to formulate and adopt sound policies in improving the livelihood and the wellbeing of all, in particular the poor and the most vulnerable.This commitment has shown through the ongoing process of advancing social security measureson health and employment.With the higher number of ratification of Paris Agreement by AIPA Member Parliaments, AIPA Member Parliaments have continued to evolve in addressing the issue of climate change. Several countries have established national committees for climate change responses. In addition, eco-tourism

has become a part of ASEAN characteristics with relevant laws on tourism industries continued to be formulated and adopted.

In WAIPA Matters, ASEAN Member States in general have guaranteed the rights of women in the work place to receive similar benefits as their men counterparts. Women participation and the number of women holding high-ranking positions in both government and private institutions have continued to increase.Gender mainstreaming policies continued to be implemented, along with the efforts to improve the skills of young women. Maternity benefits for working women have also continued to improve. In several countries, the duration of maternity leave has been extended.

WORKING GROUP 1:DISCUSSION ON REGIONAL MARITIME COOPERATION

19. The discussion of the Working Group 1 on “Regional Maritime Cooperation” was held on Tuesday, 18 July 2017 at 01:40 p.m. at the Ballroom 3 Fairmont Hotel, Jakarta. The meeting was chaired by Hon. Juliari Batubara, Vice Chairperson of the Committee for Inter-Parliamentary Cooperation of the House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia.

20. The meeting agreed to appoint Hon. Ms. Nik Hafimi Abdul Haadii from Brunei Darussalam as the Secretary of the Working Group 1.

21. H.E. Dr. Arif Havas Oegroseno, Deputy Minister for Maritime Sovereignty of Coordinating Ministry of Maritime Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia delivered hiskeynote speech. In his speech, he began with a brief descriptionof ASEAN region geography, mostly consists of waters, which provide the region with abundant waters resources. Southeast Asia is located strategically as many

countries, such as Malaysia, Indonesia and Singapore haveestablished themselves as the main choke points of the world’smaritime trade. Therefore, the role of ASEAN in global economy that shifting to Asia Pacific especially Southeast Asia region should not be overlooked.

In order to maintain peace and stability in ASEAN region, government and parliamentarians should acknowledge the kind of threats coming from maritime region. First, there are traditional threats, such as invasion from county to country. Second, criminal activities such as fishing, gun running, drug trafficking and people trafficking. Third, there are new kind of threats caused by climate change of global warming, such as coral bleaching, the rising of sea level. Due to the rising of sea level, many countries in Southeast Asia will face the problem of sea abrasion. Another threat is marine plastic debris. It is feared that by 2050, there will be more plastic-eating fish. The increasing amount of micro plastic in the ocean will pollute ocean and various fish food such as algae and plankton. This ultimately will bring adverse impact for us as fish consumers. He underlined that Asian countries are the highest contributor of the plastic debris and therefore, marine plastic debris is one of the biggest problems currently faced by the planet.

However, he acknowledged that some issues in maritime region are not easy to be discussed with, especially between governments. He proposed solid waste management as one of the important topics that ASEAN parliamentarians should think about. He gave examples that Indonesia has launched plastic debris prevention program. He also encouraged other initiatives such as tax for single plastic consumption, public campaign for not throwing things to river and promotion of bio degradable plastic industries. He underlined that ASEAN countries are rich with industrial plants that can be used as the main ingredients of bio degradable plastics, such as Palm oil in Indonesia and Malaysia, or cassava in Thailand

and Cambodia. This could be an issue for ASEAN to work together. Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore have been worked together in combating sea piracy successfully. Therefore, he expects that there is a better cooperation between ASEAN countries to reduce marine plastic debris. By doing this, ASEAN maritime region will be healthier and cleaner, thus bringing tourism, job opportunities andin the end improving economy for the region.

Delegate from Cambodia shared his concern that plastic bag consumption is still high, particularly in Asia. He questioned the possibility of banning plastic bag and encouraged the use of biodegradable plastic.

H.E. Oegroseno responded by explaining that Rwanda banned plastic bag entirely. In ASEAN however, it would be difficult to implement similar policies because many industries have been taken place. To apply such policy, there are a number of consequences. First, smarter design in the use of plastic and its alternative material is critical. Second, plastics used by industries must be recycled. Third, the types of plastic used in industries must be reduced. Lastly, single-use plastic materials should be liable for taxation. In Indonesia, a policy to reduce the use of plastic bags in supermarket and the obligation for customers to buy a plastic bag for IDR 200,- each, has reduced import expenditure up to 11 million USD.

22. AIPA Member Parliaments were next invited to present their respective Country Progress Reports on the theme of Working Group 1,“Regional Maritime Cooperation”. The presentations of the reports are highlighted hereunder:

22.1. Brunei DarussalamBrunei Darussalam Country Progress Report was delivered by Hon. Mr. Naim Haji Kamis. He explained that the

Maritime Department of Brunei Darussalam is under the purview of the Ministry of Communication. The department is the focal point to the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) as well as the chairman to the National Oil Spill Contingency Plan (NOSCoP). In supporting its function, an International Unit is established under the department. This unit is responsible for Brunei Darussalam’s bilateral maritime cooperation and regional maritime cooperation with ASEAN, APEC, and other UN bodies such as UNCTAD, UNESCAP, and UNDP. In strengthening the cooperation, Brunei Darussalam also has established several MoU with many countries. Bilaterally, Brunei Darussalam has signed a MoU on Merchant Shipping and Related Matters with the Government of the Republic of the Philippines on 27thJanuary 2003, with the Government of the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam on 12th November 2001. Multilaterally, several MoUs have been signed, including MoU on ASEAN Cooperation mechanism for Joint Oil Spill Preparedness and Response, and MoU between Governments of BIMP on Establishing and Promoting Efficient and Integrated Sea Linkages. Moreover, in coordinating the development of Department’s interest and strategic growth, Brunei Darussalam launched Research and Development Unit. Thus, it is responsible in studying IMO Conventions and provides assessments on the merits or demerits of ratifications. As part of enhancing mutual trust and cooperation between ASEAN, Brunei Darussalam hosted a multilateral exercise, which so called ASEAN Defense Ministers Meeting-Plus Maritime Security and Counter Terrorism Exercise (ADMM Plus MS & TE) in 2016. This meeting was aimed to response transnational non-traditional security challenges, that also known as the first maritime security and anti-terrorism exercise under the framework of the ADMM-PLUS.

22.2. CambodiaCambodia Country Progress Report was delivered by Hon. Mr. Nim Chantara.He acknowledged that maritime security is one of the core elements in the realization of ASEAN Community. To ensure the sustainability of the ecosystem and the livelihood of Cambodian people, action plans and programs for the management of protected natural areas have been developed such as; Law on the Environmental Protection and the Management of Natural Resources, Law on Protected Natural Areas, and Guidelines on the Development of Coastal Areas. Further, to monitor the environment and ecosystem and control the mechanism at both national and sub-national level, National Strategic Plan on Green Development 2013-2030 has been developed. As Cambodia’s maritime border is the vulnerable area to security threats, including terrorism and transnational crime that requires responses through bilateral and multilateral cooperation, the Royal Government is currently developing counter-terrorism law with the support from Australia. Cambodia is convinced, that by strengthening political stability, rule of law, multi-party democracy, and public order along with good progressing resolving border issues with neighbouring countries, peace, friendship, cooperation and development will be well developed.

22.3. IndonesiaIndonesia Country Progress Report on Regional Maritime Cooperation was delivered by Hon. Ms. Evita Nursanty. She reaffirmed the increasing importance of oceans in world trade and transportation. It is important for the oceans to remain peaceful, avoiding conflict over natural resources and territorial dispute. Indonesia has a vision to become the “Global Maritime Fulcrum”. She highlighted three critical points on strengthening maritime cooperation, namely: 1)

formulating clear legal and regulatory frameworks; 2) establish effective institutional frameworks as the implementing bodies of the relevant laws and regulations; and 3) continuously strengthen maritime cooperation at all levels. Indonesia has a leading role in enhancing maritime cooperation within the Indian Ocean Rim Association (IORA) framework. She further underlined the importance of enhancingmaritime cooperation within sub-regional frameworks. To address maritime threats, Indonesia has initiated a Trilateral Cooperation with Malaysia and the Philippines.

22.4. Lao PDRAs the only land-locked country in the region, Lao PDR opted not to deliver its Country Progress Report in the Working Group 1.

22.5. MalaysiaMalaysia Country Progress Report was delivered by Hon. Dato’ Kamarudin Bin Jaffar. He strongly stressed that terrorists and illegal traffickers must not take advantage of ASEAN waters. The sovereignty of maritime borders has become part of direct constitutional issues and therefore, must be upheld. Malaysia has enabled such laws that affect the interests of maritime security and maritime resources, in line with its constitution as an independent nation. Apart from improving the living condition of the people, the globalization of economy, the mobility of people and people’s independencyhave brought many challenges, including in the risks of cross-border crimes. ASEAN parliamentsare required to cooperate to tackle this critical issue. If the problem continues to arise, a resolution may be more difficult to be achieved. Parliaments should provide assistance to the governments through political guidance and political

commitment in helping to defend the country’s sovereignty from all forms of threats and environmental degradation. Malaysia is always looking forward to work together with other ASEAN Member Statesin harmony in accordance to the spirit of ASEAN way. To overcome piracy, far more advanced patrols is crucial. The movement of patrols should not be mapped by the perpetrators. Trilateral cooperation regarding maritime security targets areas of common concern to tackle illegal transportation. Joint forces must be properly conducted so that the result can be measured. To prevent and mitigate events of calamities at sea, sharing of intelligence and transfer of information between countries in the region must be applied accordingly. Malaysia has enacted a number of related laws on marine resources. A large amount of penalty (½ million RM) is expected to discourage the perpetrators from causing the degradation of marine ecosystem. If not taken care of, pollution at sea will be harder to be handled.

22.6. MyanmarMyanmar Country Progress Report was delivered by Hon. Ms. Khin Hnit Thit. She reported that Myanmar has actively participated in various forums such as ASEAN maritime forum, ARF and ADMM plus to address many challenges in maritime laws and policies. Myanmar has also been actively participated in EAS to show the Myanmar’s commitment in prioritizing maritime cooperation in their development plan. She underlined that fishery industries in Myanmar has followed various international guidelines provided by RPOA agency and other regional institutions. She also reported that Myanmar’s Department Of Fisheries have signed Memorandum of Understanding with Thailand to implement IUU fishing and prevent illegal fishing between the two countries. All in all, in order to enhance maritime

cooperation within ASEAN frameworks, Myanmar has been implementing port side measures, enhancement cooperation and coordination with various relevant organizations.

22.7. The PhilippinesCountry Progress Report of the Philippines was delivered by Ms. Shirlene C. Mananquil, representative of Embassy of the Philippines to Indonesia. She shared her concern that ASEAN countries are not speared from the maritime threats. The Philippines has ratified several international agreements in supporting maritime security. The Philippines has recently ratified the Paris Agreement and has actively involved in international conventions to promote the protection of marine environment, eco tourism and fishery regime. She reiterated the Philippines’ commitment to peaceful resolution of dispute. China and the Philippines have signed a MoU on Joint Coastguard Committee on Marine Cooperation. Bilateral meetings with its neighbouring countries have continued to be organized. The Philippines involved in a trilateral meeting on maritime security with Malaysia and Indonesia. Numerous international agreements have been made by the Philippines to enhance maritime security, and also to prevent terrorist acts and illegal trafficking.The Philippines have enacted several laws in supporting maritime security and ensuring the sustainability of marine resources, such as the Executive Order No.57, Republic Act No.3046, Climate Change Act 2009, Republic Act No. 10174, the Philippines Coast Guard Law, Presidential Decree on Anti-Piracy and Anti-Highway Robbery Law, Republic Act No. 9372, and Republic Act No. 6969. Piracy, kidnapping, drug trafficking, and maritime territorial dispute are among the major threats faced by ASEAN countries. She further reaffirmed that the involvement of the Philippines in various regional and international mechanisms on maritime security

has demonstrated its strong political commitment to enhance regional maritime cooperation.

22.8. SingaporeSingapore Country Progress Report was delivered by Hon.Mr. Gan Thiam Poh.Singapore adopts a free shipping policy and support liberalization in international shipping by signing ASEAN Framework Agreement on Services (AFAS), which initiates a stronger network of cooperation on the business front by reducing the trade barriers between ASEAN Member States (AMS). Singapore is also actively participated in the ASEAN Maritime Transport Working Group (MTWG) to develop ASEAN Single Shipping Market (ASSM) which envisioned allowing for a free flow of intra-ASEAN shipping service. Singapore is part of Malacca Straits Sea Patrol Framework (MSPF), a joint practical cooperative measure undertaken by Singapore, Malaysia, and Indonesia to ensure the security of Straits of Malacca and Singapore (SOMS). Singapore is also a Contracting Party of the Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combating Piracy against Ships in Asia (ReCAAP), the first regional government-to-government initiative to promote and enhance cooperation against piracy and armed robbery in Asia. Singapore signed the ASEAN Cooperation Mechanism for Joint Oil Spill Preparedness and Response Memorandum of Understanding (OSRAP MoU), which is to promote an ASEAN collaborative mechanism for building capacities and capabilities in preparedness for and response to oil spill incidents and mutual assistance in controlling and combating oil spill incidents in ASEAN. Singapore has started to develop regional oil spill contingency plan. Singapore seeks to coordinate and integrate response oil spill incidents in the region to make the region clean safe for ocean navigation.

22.9. ThailandThailand Country Progress Report was delivered by Hon. Mr. Anusart Suwanmongkol. In international level, Thailand has attended various forums such as ACFP and ASWGFi. Thailand has undertaken a 5-year project to maintain the sustainability of marine environment and sea ecosystem in Asian region. Thailand cooperate with various international agencies in combating sea piracy provide best practice in addressing sea challenges in ASEAN region. Thailand has ratified international legal framework and attempted to align their laws and policies to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). In National level, Thailand recently passed Royal Ordinance that replace various maritime law in order to be aligned with UN law. He also reported that Thailand has established Thailand Maritime Coordination Centre in order to address maritime challenges in timely manner. The Centre is expected to become a single point contact and cooperation to maritime cooperation. He concludes that Thailand support maritime cooperation to enhance peace and stability in the region.

22.10. Viet NamViet Nam Country Progress Report was delivered by Hon.Ms. Le Thu Ha. She highlighted that maritime issue is one of the most important areas in ASEAN and in ASEAN relationship with its partners. The condition of maritime security and marine resources in the region affect all the three pillars of the AEC. Viet Nam has attached importance to maritime cooperation in the region, creating favourable environmentfor development and security. Viet Nam encourages peaceful resolutions to settle international disputes, including on the issue of the South China Sea. Viet Nam has actively and responsibly participated in various

regional mechanisms on issues of resource protection and regional security. Viet Nam has signed several bilateral agreements with ASEAN Member States on coast guard and to prevent ship robberyalong the ASEAN waters. She underlined that the destruction of marine resources has caused serious consequences whichhampering sustainable development. She also mentioned that it is important to diminish IUU fishing. In this regard, Viet Nam has issued legal documents on the protection of fishery resources. To promote an effective regional maritime cooperation, Viet Nam delivered several recommendations, which include: 1) ASEAN Member States should fulfil their obligations under the UNCLOS 1982 and uphold other international instruments on fishery mechanism; 2) Strengthen confidence building through the promotion of transparencyin environmental information; and 3) Encourage AIPA Member Parliaments to formulate sound policies to limit the impact of industries towards marine environment.

(Reports by each Member Parliament under the theme of “Regional Maritime Cooperation” are attached as Annex E)

23. AIPA Member Parliaments were invited to have a discussion on national initiatives and possible common legislation.

There were several comments from the floor:

Indonesia has made restriction to use plastic mall in supermarkets and shopping malls. However, the policy has not been fully succeeded in eliminating the use of plastic bags.

Both developing and developed countries have failed to stop plastic waste from affecting marine life. A Delegate from Cambodia

suggested AIPA to ban plastic bags in all ASEAN countries and promote the use of tapioca to produce biodegradable bags.

Thailand is working on banning plastic bags. Dhaka has been more advanced in fully banning plastic bags. It is not easy to implement this policy in ASEAN countries.

AIPA Secretary General added that the initiative to ban plastic bags in Thailand was originated from the private sector. Awareness on the harmful effect of plastic waste is a good start.

Indonesia suggested that plastic ban policy should be started from AIPA Meetings. For example, by not using mineral water packed in plastic bottles.

Thailand highlighted that public education is the most important tool that should be exercised in raising awareness on the hazardous impact of plastic bags.

24. The Working Group 1 agreed to propose the topic “Marine Plastic Debris” to be accommodated as one of the Resolutions in the upcoming 38th AIPA General Assembly in the Philippines.

WORKING GROUP 2:DISCUSSION ON PEACEFUL RESOLUTION TO CONFLICTS

25. The discussion of the Working Group 2 on “Peaceful Resolution to Conflicts” was held on Tuesday, 18 July 2017 at 04.15 p.m. The meeting was chaired byHon. Mr. Dave Akbarshah Fikarno, Member of the Committee for International Parliamentary Cooperation, the House of Representative of the Republic of Indonesia.

26. The meeting agreed to appoint Hon. Mr. Chhit Kim Yeat from Cambodia as the Secretary of the Working Group 2.

27. H.E. Dr. Marty Natalegawa, Southeast Asia Programme’s Advisory Board of the Center for Strategic & International Studies (CSIS),Former Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia delivered his keynote speech. In his speech, he acknowledged that AIPA caucus represents the embodiment of such noble ASEAN commitment. AIPA is the manifestation of people-centered, people-oriented of ASEAN community. The reality of ASEAN project and initiatives require parliamentary legislation and framework to have positive effect.

This year, ASEAN celebrate the 50th year anniversary. In the half decade, ASEAN has proved its transformative contribution in changing the relationship between countries, elevating the role, and bringing better economic condition for the Southeast Asia population. However, nothing is permanent except change. Therefore, it is important to acknowledge the future of ASEAN in maintaining peace and stability in the region.

There is a sense of drift around the region and the world caused of policy inaction, contradiction and incoherence. It is important to AIPA Caucus to assert ASEAN centrality. History has shown that our leaders had the courage to formulate and legislating the Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in Southeast Asia in 1976. Even though, the lack of trust and confidence was still high in the region. There is not any shortage of ASEAN modalities instruments dealing with resolution of conflict in the region. This shows the benefit of implementing this approach in transforming Southeast Asia as a region of conflicts intoa region of cooperation.

The problem now is, how such proven potential do not stay as a potential per se? It is worrying that most of the instruments have

become dormant and under-utilized. He underlined that it is the challenge for ASEAN and AIPA in next 5 decades. How can ASEAN utilize them?

In recent years, ASEAN has experienced a tremendous transformation of democratic changes. However, unlike the Middle East region which conflict caused by Arabian springs movement, ASEAN has peacefully transformed the democratic changes in the region. ASEAN offeredto lend a hand to Myanmar during their democratic process. In 2011, Thailand and Cambodia worked together to overcome extreme conditions in their border. Both have wisdom, courage and responsibility to ensure that the problems do not affect otherASEAN countries. The South China Sea is another example where ASEAN can make impactful contribution.

It is now the time for ASEAN to keep using their modalities and instrument to solve conflicts. Otherwise, there could be a gap between intention and reality. It is of critical importance for AIPA to lend such support to governments to solve problems and develop strong partnership between ASEAN countries. ASEAN is becoming a rare institution, because all of the modalities, instruments and possibilities to solve conflicts peacefully are available. The courage is needed to make ASEAN relevant. Ahead of us, there are traditional issues and the 21stcentury problems that require cooperation between states and governments around the region. Therefore, ASEAN must show agility and adaptability in a more current way: 21stcentury solutions for 21stcentury problems.

28. AIPA Member Parliaments were invited to present their reports on the topic of Working Group 2, “Peaceful Resolution to Conflicts”.The presentations of the reports are highlighted hereunder:

28.1. Brunei DarussalamBrunei Darussalam Country Progress Report was delivered by Hon. Nik Hafimi Abdul Haadii. Shehighlighted three important points: South China Sea, Mindanao conflict, and trans-boundary haze pollution. Brunei Darussalam recommended ASEAN Countries to continue the engagement with China to ensure the full and effective implementation of the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea (DOC). For the conflict in Mindanao, Brunei Darussalam suggested to continue the monitoring missions and support the ceasefire agreement. They also suggested maintaining the momentum for the resolution to the conflict in Mindanao. Concerning the ASEAN Agreement to the Trans-boundary Haze Pollution, Brunei Darussalam encouraged the continuation of the prevention and the monitoring of trans-boundary haze pollution with strong commitment in strengthening national and regional capacities. Further, Brunei Darussalam urged the implementation of activities and programs of the agreement.

28.2. CambodiaCambodia Country Progress Report was delivered by Hon. Mr. Nim Chantara. He highlighted that domestic stability is a foundation in maintaining peace and stability in regional level. From a different perspective, he further explained that dispute between workers and companies,that prevalently occurred, not only in Cambodia but also in other ASEAN Member States, could pose a challenge to regional stability. In this regard, Cambodia suggested harmonizing industrial relation, updating labour law, strengthening adherence to work discipline and professional ethics, as well as creating conflict-resolution mechanism to prevent and resolve disputes.

28.3. IndonesiaIndonesia Country Progress Report on Peaceful Resolution to Conflict was delivered by Hon.Mr. Mahfudz Sidik. He highlighted that conflicts left psychological wounds and hampering national development. It is critical to formulate a legal basis on social conflict management, which also addresses conflict prevention, cessation of conflicts and post-conflict recovery. He further stressed that conflict management should be aimed at creating a safe, peaceful, and prosperous society.He urged AIPA to re-encourage ASEAN Member States to intensify joint efforts in conflict management. Indonesia has a particular concern on the humanitarian and security situation of the minority groups in the region, with respect for human rights and protection of all communities.

28.4. Lao PDRLao PDR Country Progress Report was delivered by Hon. Mr. Viengthavisone Thephachanh. Lao PDR has been enjoying domestic stability in the recent years by maintaining peaceful coexistence among its multiethnic people and its neighbouring countries. Lao PDR upholds the principles of non-interference in domestic affairs of other countries. Lao PDR has made tremendous efforts in maintain the unity of its heterogeneous nation byguaranteeing the rights of multiethnic groups to preserve their cultural heritage and identities. No violent conflicts occur in Lao PDR, but the country also faces threats from conflicts due to socio-economic issues. To address this matter, Lao PDR promotes greater public participation to accommodate the interests of different groups. Public consultations have been held accordingly. Lao PDR has played an active role in ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF). Lao PDR has made significant efforts in addressing border issues with its neighbouring countries

through peaceful negotiation while raising mutual respect and understanding among the people.

28.5. MalaysiaMalaysia Country Progress Report was delivered by Hon.Datuk Rozman Bin Datuk Haji Isli. He stressed that the need for peaceful resolution to conflict is crucial. However in some occasions, efforts to resolve conflict and crisis-situations failed due to the complex nature of humanity. Malaysia upholds peaceful settlement mechanism in conflict resolution. On the issue of South China Sea, Malaysia has been building closer ties with China, called for "the full and effective implementation" of the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea (DOC) signed between ASEAN and China in 2002. Malaysia also shared a particular concern on the issue of Rohingya while expected that the citizenship issue of the Rohingya can be resolved through peaceful negotiations. Malaysia also remains committed to the peace process in the Southern Philippines. On UN Global Development Agenda 2030, Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform Report 2017 showed that Malaysia has sustained a remarkable achievement in the attainment of the Sustainable Development Goals, one of which is the “full employment” status since 1992. On other security issue, Malaysia expressed its concern over the recent tension in the Korean Peninsula by stating that the act demonstrated by the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) has threatened regional peace, security and stability. Malaysia urged DPRK to comply with the UNSC resolutions. Malaysia remains committed to the Framework on Trilateral Cooperative Arrangement on Immediate Measures to Address Security Issues in the Maritime Areas of Common Concern, which was signed on 14 July 2016 with Indonesia and the Philippines.

28.6. MyanmarMyanmarCountry Progress Report was delivered by Hon. Ms. Htoot May.Myanmar has been actively engaged in promoting peace through regional and international forums. In June 2017, Myanmar was chair of ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF). Co-chaired by the EU and the US, the forum aimed to foster the implementation of ASEAN Political and Security Community Blueprint 2025, as well as to explore and exchange experience in peace building through preventive diplomacy and mediation measures. The Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement (NCA) exists to approve that reality seemingly. The NCA provide important points as principle guidance for lasting peace, especially protection of civilians and provision of humanitarian assistance as urgent actions. This plays a vital role in taking the peace process forward.

Myanmar affirmed the importance of women’s participation in the peace process, including conflict prevention and resolution. To build women’s skills and confidence as well as to empower women playing greater role in peace negotiations, training course for women has been conducted in 2012 by the UN Women. The Department of Social Welfare has provided trainings on CEDAW implementation. Myanmar realized the necessary to resolve conflicts between armed ethnic groups and the government. Engagement with key stakeholders such as; political parties – both national and ethnic – as well as communities, is important in the peace process.

28.7. The PhilippinesCountry Progress Report of the Philippines was delivered byMs. Shirlene C. Mananquil, representative of the Embassy of the Philippines to Indonesia.The Philippines has

experienced several conflicts with various rebel groups in the country. In Mindanao, the presence of the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF) poses a threat to national peace and stability. The Philippine Government is committed to the peaceful resolution of conflicts with the Communist Party of the Philippines-New People’s Army-National Democratic Front, MNLF and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front. The Philippines Government is also committed to end hostilities and violence in the country, and has engaged in various agreements with the parties involved for a peaceful resolution.Meanwhile, the Congress of the Philippines has approved several laws in response to the ongoing tension and the Government’s commitment to achieve peaceful resolution, such as the Republic Act No. 9851 on the “Philippine Act on Crimes against International Humanitarian Law, Genocide, and Other Crimes against Humanity”. According to the Executive Order No. 3, Series of 2001, the Philippines Government has adopted a comprehensive peace process which upholds severalcore principles, such as: community-based movement which reflects the sentiments, values and principles important to all Filipinos; the creation of a just, equitable, humane and pluralistic society; and continue to seek peaceful resolution to internal armed conflicts.

28.8. SingaporeSingapore Country Progress Report was delivered by Hon. Mr. Ng Kok Kwang Louis.Singapore realizes the common threat posed by transnational security challenges. Singapore admits that as a small country, their state security and prosperity are greatly dependent on the regional peace and stability. Singapore actively participates in the regional forums, including the ASEAN Defense Ministers’ Meeting (ADMM) where Singapore took part in the Joint Declaration

on combating terrorism. The Declaration was signed at the 10thADMM in Vientiane last year. Further, Singapore showed their commitment by hosting the East Asia Summit (EAS) Symposium on Religious Rehabilitation and Social Reintegration in 2015. As a platform, the symposium allowed 30 participating countries to exchange their strategies and best practices in rehabilitating and reintegrating former militants into productive members of society.

Singapore has worked with ASEAN Member States and China in an objective and transparent manner to enhance mutual trust and confidence, as well as deepen the close relationship. Notably, ASEAN and China concluded negotiations on the draft framework for the Code of Conduct in the South China Sea (COC) in May 2017.

In the international level, Singapore joined UN Multinational Peace Keeping Operation. Not less than 1.500 personnel of Singapore Armed Force (SAF) has been sent to UN peacekeeping mission in the last 26 years.

28.9. ThailandThailand Country Progress Report was delivered by Hon. Mr. Anusart Suwanmongkol. Thailand acknowledges that effective partnerships with and participation of major powers and external parties will be important for the effective functioning of the regional architecture on the following issues: First, Thailand joined ASEAN Summit in Manila, Philippines on 28-29 April 2017 in strongly urging the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) to comply fully with its obligations arising from all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions and international law. Second, on border management, Thailand pays an attention to resolve issues on the border with neighbouring countries

by setting Joint Commission. Thirdly, although in 2016 Thailand is safe from attacks, Thailand still faces challenges of being used as a transit point by violent extremism supporters to other countries due to its central location and connectivity within Southeast Asia. Lastly, Thailand attaches great importance to maintaining peace and stability in Southeast Asia and adjacent areas. Therefore Thailand had a statement on Peace, Stability and Sustainable Development in the South China Sea.

In conclusion, Thailand suggests that AIPA together should act according to the goals of ASEAN Political-Security Community (APSC) Blueprint 2025.

28.10. Viet NamViet Nam Country Progress Report was delivered by Hon. Mr. Nguyen Mai Bo. Recently, Viet Nam has continued to actively and responsibly participate in ASEAN cooperation, significantly contributing to the implementation of the ASEAN Vision 2025 on the 3 pillars, including Politically-Security pillars. Viet Nam has actively participated and promoted cooperation in regional forum mechanisms such as the EAS, the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF), the Defense Ministers' Meeting (ADMM Plus). In addition, Viet Nam has also participated in the development of work plans with appropriate content and chaired/co-chaired the practical activities in the diplomatic, defense and public security such as the ASEAN-China Senior Officials Meeting and the Joint Working Group of the Declaration on Conduct of Parties (DOC) in June 2016, the 4thADMM Plus Humanitarian Mine Action Group (October 2016), ARF training on preventive diplomacy and so on.

Viet Nam appreciates the efforts of ASEAN and its stakeholders and stresses that it will continue to actively and responsibly participate in ASEAN, working closely with the Parties to build a stable ASEAN Community, Peace, prosperity under the commitments we have adopted.

Viet Nam has strongly supported initiatives and cooperation mechanisms to maintain peace, stability and the promotion of international maritime disputes, including disputes in the South China Sea by means of peaceful solutions on the basis of international law.

(Reports by each Parliament under the theme of Peaceful Resolution to Conflicts are attached as Annex F)

(No further comments from the floor)

WORKING GROUP 3:DISCUSSION ON CITES (CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA)

30. The discussion of the Working Group 3 on “Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES)” was held on Wednesday, 19 July 2017. The meeting was chaired by Hon. Syaifullah Tamliha, Vice Chairperson of the Committee for International Parliamentary Cooperation, the House of Representative of Republic of Indonesia.

31. The meeting agreed to appoint Hon. Mr. Viengthavisone Thephachanh as the Secretary of the Working Group 3.

32. Mr. Brian V. Gonzales, Partnership Specialist and Objective 3 Lead (USAID Wildlife Asia Activity) of Freeland delivered his presentation on “Policy reforms: Going beyond arrests and seizures”. He began with the history behind AIPA and Freeland cooperation to reform the system and policy in environmental and wildlife protection laws. He acknowledged that many ASEAN countries already revised their wildlife laws to conform with CITES. He expects that other countries will follow and translate CITES to their national legislation.

He highlighted some activities with AIPA. First, the launching of ARREST facilitated by Secretary General of AIPA in 2011. Second, Lombok GA Resolution in 2012 and upgraded collaboration with The ASEAN Senior Officials Meeting on Transnational Crime (SOMTC) in 2015. Third, the launching of ASEAN Handbook on Legal Cooperation to Combat Wildlife Crime in Luang Prabang last year. The handbook is being utilized as the baseline for legislation on wildlife conservation.

Freeland is implementing new projects on legislative, support and research to combat wildlife trafficking with various Funding Agency and Implementing Partners, including their main consortium partner, USAID Wildlife Asia. USAID Wildlife Asia has 4 main objectives to ultimately Reduced Wildlife Crime and Illegal Trade. He highlighted his organization’s main work to continue supporting AIPA in improving enforcement and prosecution of existing laws, policies, and agreements. For example, Freeland works together with the governments of Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia and Lao to further improve their laws/policies regarding wildlife conservation and protection. Other USAID Wildlife Asia projects in other ASEAN Member States are USAID BIJAK in Indonesia, USAID PROTECT Wildlife in the Philippines and USAID Saving Species in Vietnam.

He explained that legislative works have been developed with AIPA Member Parliaments with legislation support partners, such as International Conservation Caucus Foundation (ICCF), U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Congress Potential as well as other potential partners such as the UK parliament which willing to contribute technical support in research and legal advice. In Thailand, Freeland works with the Supreme Court to monitor and enhance law and policy to combat wildlife trafficking. He also acknowledged that Freeland will expand their collaboration with other potential partners such as Asian Judges Network on the Environment, ASEAN Chief Justices Roundtable on the Environment and Asian Development Bank. He expects that this event will lead to regional cooperation that involved AIPA member parliamentarians for further networking and collaboration in combating wildlife trafficking.

Ms. Sallie Yang, Legal Specialist (USAID Wildlife Asia Activity) of Freeland delivered her presentation on “Combating Wildlife Trafficking: Best Practices and Innovations”. She highlighted the Handbook on Legal Cooperation to Combat Wildlife Crime that was launched during the 1st working group on CITES and Wildlife Protection in the 8th AIPA Caucus 2016 in Luang Prabang. She acknowledged that the role of parliament is often understated. Therefore, she expects that the parliamentarians can utilize the Handbook as a guideline to reform or develop law and policy in combating Wildlife crime.

In order to achieve their objectives, Freeland encourage innovations and best practices that ASEAN countries can learn and adopt from each other. For example, during the last Asia-Africa Symposium on Wildlife, Freeland invited Tazmanian parliamentarians to share their experience to combat wildlife

trafficking. She highlighted some of the innovations and best practices from ASEAN countries.

First, to provide sufficient resources and funding to combat wildlife trafficking, the Philippines has Biodiversity Financing (BIOFIN) and the Philippine Republic Act (RA) 9147 Wildlife Management Fund that specifically allocates fund to sustain conservation and rescue centre as well as law enforcement forces to counter wildlife trafficking efforts.

Second, in order to eliminate the disparity in the protection level of wildlife in the region, Cambodia and Thailand have started to harmonize protections & penalties throughout the region. She expects that harmonized law and increased penalty will reduce the amount of hotspots for wildlife crimes in Southeast Asia.

Third, in order to encourage law enforcement and informant, Freeland acknowledges that sharing bounty or sharing a percentage of any profits that they make from confiscations is important. Examples from the Philippines and Thailand showed good practices in incentivizing anti-wildlife trafficking actions by rewarding informants.

Fourth, in order to provide sufficient rangers, Freeland expects ASEAN countries to deputize members of civil society as wildlife enforcement officers, as has been practiced in the Philippines where the community are encouraged to be involved and to join the patrol line and protection of wildlife conservation area.

We need to provide oversight to the judicial system, making sure that wildlife crimesare taken seriously. We can also develop special courts that focus solely on environmental crime.

Fifth, examples of good practice in prosecutorial oversight and support can be exercised from Thailand with their Green Courts and specialized Judges as well as the Philippines Supreme Court Rules of Procedures on Environment Cases.

Sixth, in developing and harnessing partnerships, Freeland expects that ASEAN countries government can encourage community engagement and participation in protecting wildlife ecosystem and combating wildlife crimes.

Seventh, Freeland encourages the utilization of e-petitions as an easy way to make sure that concerns are heard by Government and Parliament. Usage of e-petition, like in UK, can be useful tool for people to reach out and discuss issue of wildlife with executives and parliamentarians.

Lastly, she emphasized that Freeland will continue to work with AIPA member parliamentarians to improve and reform laws and policies that counter wildlife trafficking efforts in the region. Freeland will provide AIPA with policy Packages Developed for partner Parliaments, support for Legislative Oversights and Research to AIPA MPs as well as work plan missions in ASEAN countries.

(The power point presentation is attached as Annex G)

33. AIPA Member Parliaments were invited to present their reports on the topic of Working Group 3 on “Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES)”.The presentations of the reports are highlighted hereunder:

33.1. Brunei Darussalam

Brunei Darussalam Country Progress Report was delivered by Hon. Nik Hafimi Abdul Haadii.Aiming to create public awareness on the importance of wildlife protection through network and teamwork with ASEAN Member States, Brunei Darussalam established Wildlife Division under the Ministry of Primary Resources & Tourism. Since then, Brunei Darussalam actively participated in regional meetings on wildlife. Various initiatives and activities have been conducted to support wildlife protection. In February 2016, Biodiversity and Natural History Society (BruWild) began its first project “Saving Our Turtles Outreach Programs”. Forestry Department initiated discontinuation of logging in the peat swamp forest in the State-land Forest and new logging concessions in Forest Reserves (production). Besides banning the import and trade of all shark products, Department of Fisheries has also enforced the ban of catching, landing and selling of all shark species. More importantly, while the Plant Quarantine Act and Regulations is now being drafted by the Bio-Security Division, the Biodiversity Law (under the purview of Bio-Ric) is in the final stage of drafting. In conclusion, Brunei Darussalam mentioned some points that need to be improved, among others; inter-agency collaboration and coordination in wildlife surveillance and capacity development of the manpower.

33.2. CambodiaCambodia Country Progress Report was delivered by Hon. Mr. Chhit Kim Yeat. In 2010, Cambodia established the Cambodia-WEN Coordination Unit (CWCU) which led and managed by the Forestry Administration leader and staff assigned by Director General of FA. This unit aimed at ensuring that law and other legal framework documents are being implemented and the numbers of wildlife crimes are

reduced throughout the country and across borders for wildlife preservation and sustainability. The unit provides training for managers, rangers, and foresters. A permanent team has been set to investigate, control and suppress the number of wildlife offenses. In 2015, the unit collected a total fine of USD 76,558.

33.3. IndonesiaIndonesia Country Progress Report on CITES was delivered by Hon. Mr. Hamdani. He informed that Indonesian wildlife are increasingly at risk of being trafficked, including ivory, pangolin, lobster larvae, pig-nosed turtles, owls, eagles, and orang-utan. Indonesia urged ASEAN and AIPA leaders to put their concern on this issue, to stop the rising smuggling activities of wildlife.Illicit trafficking of wildlife has a very complex supply chain, as it may involve many parties, ranging from hunters to exporters in many countries. Indonesia has initiated an amendment on the Law on Animal, Fish and Plant Quarantine as a tool to strengthen the legal framework for early detection of wildlife trafficking. He underlined that the effects of human activities are manifested at all ecological scales, from short-term changes in the behaviour of an animal to global extinctions. He further acknowledged the role of CITES in addressing illegal trade of endangered species, which could only be eliminated with effective regional and international coordination and cooperation.

33.4. Lao PDRLao PDR Country Progress Report was delivered by Hon. Mr. Sanya Praseuth.Lao PDR became a member of CITES in 2004. Given the fact that the Lao PDR shares borders with 5 countries, namely China, Myanmar, Thailand, Cambodia and Vietnam, it has been considered as an important transit

country through which trades in species listed in the appendices of CITES have taken place.Despite Lao PDR’sgreatefforts in combating wildlife crimes, the country still faces numerous challenges, due to: The lack of robust scientific institutions;Grey areas or inadequate laws;Law enforcement without conviction;Lack of information systems;Weak institutional arrangements and capacity building;Poor communication and integration of various initiatives;Lack of budgeting; andInsufficient of rural development and poverty reduction program.Recognizing the importance and the need to suppress illegal cross border trade in wild fauna and flora and endangered wildlife species, the Lao Delegation called upon members of AIPA and the related parties to help the country in combating illegal trafficking of wildlife and aquatic animals as stipulated under the CITES.

33.5. MalaysiaMalaysia Country Progress Report was delivered by Hon. Mr. Dato’ Kamarudin Bin Jaffar. He stressed that overharvest could be motivated by greed and often exacerbated by international trade of endangered wildlife species. As a party to CITES, Malaysia has established the Malaysia Wildlife Enforcement Network (My-WEN) to enhance cooperation among Departments and Agencies in combating illegal trade of wild fauna and flora. The membership comprised of CITES Management Authorities and law enforcement agencies. In practice however, the meeting also involving private companies such as logistic operators. Malaysia has also established a dedicated court to adjudicate cases involving environmental crime, which is known as the ‘Green Court’. This step marked Malaysia’s commitment in addressing environmental and biodiversity issues. Between 2004-2011, the UN-FAO reported that the

domestic consumption of shark fins by Malaysians has jumped an average of 54% each year. Responding to this situation, Sabah Tourism, Culture and Environment Minister has imposed a ban on the activity of de-finned and openly sold shark products. Currently, a new law is being formulated to protect most marine species, including sharks. Malaysia is committed to continuously improving the legislations, advancing the implementation and enforcement; and also take part in regional collaboration and special joint-enforcement operations.

33.6. MyanmarMyanmar Country Progress Report was delivered by Hon. Mr. Lwin Ko Latt. Until pre-1996, the coverage of protected areas in Myanmar only reached less than 1% which sizes ranged from 0.47 to 2150 km2. After 1996, large protected areas were established for conservation.Among the established 40 protected areas, Park Warden Offices opened in 20 protected areas.Staffs are assigned to conduct patrol to prevent hunting, illegal logging and encroachment. Environmental education activities are being conducted at the nearby villages to raise public awareness. In addition to conducting patrol, the Park Warden Offices are mandated to assist law enforcement, monitor key species, provide environmental education, promote eco-tourism, and collaborate with other bodies for research. He strongly stressed that illicit trade of wild flora and fauna is a major threat to biodiversity. To address this issue, Myanmar continuously enhances inter-department collaboration and has established the National Wildlife Enforcement Task Force which involving the senior officials from the Forest Department, the Police Force, Customs Department, General Administrative Department, Directorate of Trade, the Ministry of Border Affairs and the Union Attorney General’s

Office. The Forest Department is also collaborating with international and regional bodies such as ASEAN Wildlife Enforcement Network (ASEAN-WEN) and the Wildlife Crime Working Group of The International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL). SMART (Spatial Monitoring and Reporting Tool) system is being applied for patrolling and enhancing law enforcement in the protected areas. Myanmar entered to CITES in 1997. Since then, Myanmar has formulated several policies in protecting biodiversity, such as the National Forestry Sector Master Plan and the National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan,2015-2020.

33.7. The PhilippinesThe Country Progress Report of the Philippines was delivered bytheir representative from the Embassy of the Philippines. On behalf of Her Excellency Ambassador of the Philippines to Indonesia. He stated that the importance of the wildlife industry cannot be overemphasized as it has benefitted many Filipinos in terms of employment and direct income. The Philippines however also challenged by illegal wildlife trafficking. The Philippines joined CITES in 1981. Since then, the Philippines has enacted several laws and policies to ensure the creation of a sustainable wildlife ecosystem for fauna and flora, such as the Philippine Fisheries Code of 1998, Wildlife Resources Conservation and Protection Act, Guidelines in Establishing the Wild Fauna Marking and Identification System, Wildlife Resources Conservation and Protection Act, and Wildlife Rescue Center Manual of Operations.The Philippines reiterated that the concerted efforts of the government and the people, and international cooperation are imperative to effectively conserve, preserve and protect the world’s wildlife resources.

33.8. Singapore

Singapore Country Progress Report was delivered by Hon. Mr. Ng Kok Kwang Louis. Singapore became a party to the CITES in 1986, eleven years after it came into force in 1975. The implementation and enforcement of CITES and wildlife policies in Singapore are carried out by the Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority (AVA). Legislation on wildlife such as the Endangered Species (Import & Export) Act (ESA) is administered by AVA. AVA works closely with concerned authorities such as Immigration & Checkpoints Authority (ICA), Customs, local police and Interpol. In its work, AVA also engages with CITES Secretariat, CITES and Non-CITES Parties, NGOs as well as the society. For example, AVA organised an Ivory Crush event on 13 June 2016 to destroy 7.9 tons of confiscated ivory stockpiles. The objective of the event was to send a signal that Singapore has zero tolerance of the illegal wildlife trade and to deter elephants poaching. Further, to enhance skills, knowledge and identification of CITES-protected species, AVA conducts capacity building and species identification trainings. In the 17th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to CITES (COP17) in Johannesburg, South Africa, Singapore participated in the adoption of the CITES amendment of Appendices I and II. Following COP17, the Schedule of the ESA has been amended, and the amendment entered into effect on 2 January 2017.

33.9. ThailandThailand Country Progress Report was delivered by Hon. Gen. Preecha Jan-O-Cha. Thailand ratified CITES in 1983, in which three departments are responsible for its implementation, namely: the Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant conservation (terrestrial animals); the Department of Fisheries (aquatic animals); and the

Department of Agriculture (plants). Thailand has taken several strategies in efforts to preserve its wildlife, which include: controlling domestic ivory trade, the protection of Siamese Rosewood, hosting the CITES CoP in 2004 and 2016, leading the ASEAN Working Group on CITES and Wildlife Enforcement (AWG-CITES and WE), as well as enacting several laws to protect Thai elephants, for example the Wildlife Conservation and Protection Act and the law on the Prevention of Cruelty and Animal Welfare. With regard to the illegal logging of the Siamese Rosewood, Thailand proposed the following recommendations to the 9th AIPA Caucus: 1) The establishment of a specialized taskforce on tackling illegal trade of Siamese Rosewood under AWG CITES and WE, and to nominate a country representative(s) to join the taskforce; and 2) Request all range states of Siamese Rosewood to make Non-detriment Finding (NDF) and set export quota for the species at the 23rd Plants Committee Meeting (Geneva, 22-27 July 2017).

33.10. Viet NamViet Nam Country Progress Report was delivered by Hon. Mr. Le Quang Huy. In 2010, Viet Nam established the National Steering Committee for Wildlife Law Enforcement Network, chaired by Deputy Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development and comprised of around 14 other institutions. The National Committee organized annual meetings to review the implementation of CITES. Vietnam has adopted CITES into its national legislations, such as the Law on Forest Protection and Development, Fisheries Law, Law on Biodiversity, and Investment Law. In the 17thmeeting of the CoP held in South Africa from September to October, 2016, all ASEAN countries supported Viet Nam's proposal to include pangolins, crocodile lizards and yellow tail gecko in “Annex I - Prohibition of International Trade for Commercial

Purposes”. Viet Nam is currently still facing numerous obstacleswith regard to CITES Implementation: 1)It has not been considered as an important task for some ministries and departments while local governments have not allocated appropriate resources for nature conservation; 2) Overlapping tasks and responsibilities of assigned ministries which led to the ineffective implementation of CITES and biodiversity conservation; and 3) Globalization and international trade have enabledthe perpetrators of wildlife crimes to utilize modern/sophisticated tools while the necessary equipments and human resources allocated for CITES implementation are limited. In response to this situation, Viet Nam proposed the following recommendations to the 9th AIPA Caucus: 1) To set CITES implementation and wildlife enforcement as one of the central issues in ASEAN legislative works; and 2) To enhance the role and position of AWG-CITES and WE by carefully considering the ASEAN Secretariats on CITES while formulating important decisions on the protection of wildlife in the ASEAN region.

(The reports by each Member Parliament under the theme of CITES are attached as Annex H)

Upon further discussion, Indonesia suggested that AIPA Member Parliaments should pursue common legislation platform. Indonesia called on AIPA Member Parliaments to reform their regulations in order to stop wildlife trafficking and protect biodiversity in the region from extinction. Indonesia further suggested each AIPA Member Country to sign an MoU that supports the development of common laws and policies in supporting CITES implementation.

Indonesia and Thailand suggested the establishment of a Joint Task Force within AIPA Delegates. The Joint Task Force is expected to meet up regularly to exchange information and harmonize regulations.

SPECIAL SESSION ON DEVELOPING AIPA CAPACITY

35. The discussion of the Special Session on “Developing AIPA Capacity” was held on Wednesday, 19 July 2017. The meeting was chaired by H.E. Mr. Fahri Hamzah. In his opening remarks, he stated that one of the biggest challenges for ASEAN is to create awareness of its existence among the people in the region. AIPA in this regard, has exercised efforts to bring the people closer. It is therefore important to enhance AIPA’s engagement with ASEAN to achieve AIPA’s objective in supporting ASEAN’s visions and goals.In 2007, AIPA Caucus formed to assist the executive committee to monitor the implementation of AIPA resolutions. He further stressed that to deliver its objective, institutional building for AIPA is crucial.What we can do as parliamentarians to pursue this objective? As the regional stakeholders of ASEAN, it is important for AIPA to reach out the constituents in a way that best reflects the interest of the communities. He invited AIPA Member Parliaments to voice their opinions in raising the status of AIPA.

36. Hon. Isra Sunthornvut, Secretary General of AIPA delivered his presentation on Developing AIPA Capacity. AIPA has entered its 40th year of existence. The major challengefor AIPA is that its position is currently in a crossroad. AIPA is still relatively unknown. The secretariat is willing to assist, to seek help from affiliates and partners of AIPA in the process of rebranding. ASEAN is a Formula1 car, but who is the driver? AIPA is the pit crew. As the leaders make policies, you need parliaments to make the laws toput the policies into reality.

AIPA holds the pit crew and becomes the engine in ASEAN. Making laws is neither sexy nor interesting. But it is very important for the people of the region. The problem for AIPA is that AIPA needs to make itself known to encourage policy harmonization in the region and to promote harmonized regulations among the people. There is a considerable distant between the people and the parliamentarians. This is what has been faced by AIPAwith regard to law and policy.

Rebranding will become an effective way to distribute AIPA message.AIPA could only be heard if it has become the voice of ASEAN people. This is a forum where opinions on ASEAN are expressed and heard. In September 2017 during the 38th AIPA GA, AIPA willintroduce its new logo. AIPA is currently in the process of revamping the social media so that the people can have access to AIPA. AIPA needs to fight to gain people’s attention. AIPA has been initiating project-based initiative to encourage harmonization and collaboration in a single issue. For example, on the issue of plastic use. Itis not ‘sexy’ but it affects all of us. It may be difficult to achieve a common understanding and to implement a common policy standard as ASEAN consists of 10 countries. AIPA Secretary General encouraged AIPA Members to promote “Your AIPA for Our ASEAN”. He also expected AIPA to move forward and to be more relevant.

37. H.E. Fahri Hamzah further explained that with regard to strengthen AIPA’s capacity, there are some issues that need to be systematically formulated by the Secretariat. He underlined several points: It is critical to raise awareness on ASEAN and AIPA. There is a gap between AIPA and the people of ASEAN, but it has happened not only in ASEAN. The distant relationship between the parliament and the people is common. The key point is to strengthen the culture of democracy. Without strong awareness on

democracy itself, people’s awareness on the role of parliament would be inadequate. We need to continuously building democracy and increase political awareness among the people within our own jurisdiction as a strong foundation in creating a solid regional integration. He further explained his views on the future of ASEAN: an enclave of a group of nations with strong culture of peace and democracy. To materialize the values of democracy and peace is a major challenge for AIPA.

38. Discussion on national initiatives to support AIPA Capacity Building. AIPA Member Parliaments were invited to deliver their opinions and ideas regarding this matter.

The inputs and recommendations were considered and summarized hereunder:

IndonesiaThe people see parliament as a foreign entity. We need to work on our culture of democracy. Public awareness on the role of parliament as people’s representatives is still low. We need to strengthen the values of democracy in our country. ASEAN will become a strong democratic institution with shared values for their members and becomea place for the member to be a breeding ground for better democracy.

ThailandThe Delegate supported the idea broughtby the Secretary General. The Delegate suggested that we should celebrate AIPA birthday so that the people will have better understanding and have closer relationship with AIPA. The Delegatesuggested that a seminar should be held to commemorate the half decade of AIPA’s inceptionin this upcoming September.

Brunei

The Delegate suggested AIPA to stocktake all of its activities to streamline its works and to see what is still needed for AIPA to move forward to make policies for the future generation.

IndonesiaThe Delegate suggested AIPA to have smaller discussion forum among delegates to discuss specific issues. For instance, if conflicts between members occur. AIPA has not yet established a structure to address such situation.

CambodiaThe Delegate suggested that we should look forward to make AIPA a great organization. The Asian Parliamentary Assembly (APA) has initiated the creation of Asian Parliament. In this regard, the Delegate suggested AIPA to transform into ASEAN parliament similar to European parliament.

MalaysiaThe Delegate suggested AIPA to hold the view of looking towardsthe European Parliament. The Delegate later suggested AIPA to look towards the IPU which is very active with disseminating regular information on issues, activities and policies around the world. AIPA secretariat needs to push the coordination of legislative activities. For instance, in this event, delegates have worked together and discussed common topics of peaceful resolution, maritime security and marine resources, and CITES.

Lao PDRThe Delegate recalled that AIPA contributed a lot in ASEAN development and has made enormous efforts to define AIPA’s position in ASEAN. It seems that ASEAN leaders or AIPA leaders do not want to see AIPA as a legislative platform. Rather, they opt for AIPA to limit itself as a forum for ASEAN Parliamentary cooperation per se. The Delegate proposedAIPA leaders to discuss

their vision on AIPA’s position in the future during the upcoming GA.

SingaporeThe Delegate suggestedthe need to establish closer group or task force to gain more attention from the public. Singapore supported the idea to bring the issue of developing AIPA capacity to AIPA GA for further discussion.

ThailandThe Delegate suggested that if there is a flashpoint in ASEAN, someone needs to raise a statement. This will attract the attention. Website should be more informative to attract students to learn about laws and policies around the region.

ASEAN SecretariatThe ASEAN Secretariat will facilitate any ASEAN entities to establish better communication with ASEAN CPR. AIPA can benefit from closer work via the Committee of Permanent Representatives (CPR).

AIPA Secretary GeneralHe acknowledged that AIPA should move forward and be at same level as ASEAN. To make AIPA more concrete and valuable, AIPA has reached out cooperation with other entities, such as ASEAN university network and ASEAN law association. For example, ASEAN university network can be a think tank for specific issues. Meanwhile, the law association consists of judges, prosecutors, and lawyers that will help AIPA in legal aspect and in harmonize laws.

The awareness programs that have been usually held in Jakarta, needto reach out other cities and other ASEAN countries. It is important to introduce AIPA to various international organisations. He proposed AIPA to find a common legislative means in child

protection that could gain the attention of public and media. The child protection issue is considered as a common issue that can be worked together among AIPA members.

39. H.E. Fahri Hamzah suggested the meeting to propose some recommendations on this topic to be submitted to the 38th AIPA GA. In coordination with AIPA Secretariat, Indonesia has formulated several recommendations as the outcome of this meeting.

To summarize, the recommendations consist of the following:

1) To develop a strong institution of AIPA to be at the same level with ASEAN;

2) To better reflect the aspirations and regional situations by establishing other necessary mechanism beyond business as usual;

3) To reform the AIPA Secretariat;4) To enhance the capacity of each AIPA National Secretariat; and5) To review the Statute and develop necessary proposal of

amendments.

The Meeting agreed to adopt the recommendation for further discussion in the Committee of Organizational Matters at the upcoming AIPA GA Meeting.(The full text of the adopted recommendation is attached as Annex I)

REPORT ON THE RESULTS OF THE WORKING GROUPS

40. Chaired by Hon. Juliari Batubara, this session took place on Wednesday, 19 July 2017 at 03.00 p.m. He delivered the Reports of the Working Group 1, Working Group 2, Working Group 3, and Report of the Special Session.

Upon further discussion, the Meeting agreed to adopt the Reports.

(The reports of the Working Groups and the Special Session are attached as Annex J)

SECOND PLENARY SESSION

41. The Second Plenary Session of the 9th AIPA Caucus was held at 6:30 p.m. on Wednesday, 19 July 2017 and was chaired by H.E. Fadli Zon.

42. H.E. Fadli Zon announced that the Union Assembly ofMyanmar will be the host of the 10th AIPA Caucus.

43. Hon. Ms. Htoot May, the Head of Delegation of Myanmar, delivered her acceptance speech. Firstly, she congratulated H.E. Fadli Zon for the successful completion of the 9th AIPA Caucus Meeting. She further stated that hosting AIPA Meeting demonstrates the commitment of the Union Assembly of Myanmar to help fulfillingthe goals of AIPA. She officially announced the acceptance of Myanmar to host the next AIPA Caucus Meeting. She extended her invitation to all Delegates to attend the upcoming meeting in Nay Pyi Daw. The date and venue of the 10thAIPA Caucus Meeting will be informed to the AIPA Secretariat to be disseminated to all AIPA Member Parliaments.(The Acceptance Speech by the next host Parliament is attached as Annex L)

44. The meeting considered and adopted the final report of the 9th

AIPA Caucus. Upon the adoption of the report, Heads of Delegations of all AIPA Member Parliaments officially signed the report.(The Executive Summary of the Report is attached as Annex K)

45. H.E. Dr. Fadli Zon, Vice Speaker of the House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia, delivered his closing remarks. He expressed his gratitude to all delegates for their active participation and invaluable contribution to the success of the 9th

AIPA Caucus Meeting. He also expressed his appreciation for the keynote speakers. He further stated that AIPA should seek to support the Philippines’ chairmanship in ASEAN which raised the theme “Partnering for Change, Engaging the World.” The Indonesian House of Representatives would like to extend an invitation to all AIPA Member Parliaments to take an active role and full participation on the World Parliamentary Forum on Sustainable Development. The course of this forum is an inter-parliamentary dialogue between AIPA and the European Parliament, a joint initiative of the EU Mission to ASEAN and AIPA under the patronage of the Indonesian House of Representatives.(The closing remarks is attached as Annex M)

46. With the conclusion of his remarks,H.E. Fadli Zon officially adjourned the 9th AIPA Caucus Meeting.

Report of the 5th AIPA · Web viewReport of the 9 th AIPA Caucus INTRODUCTION The 9th ASEAN...

Documents

The Caucus Papers

AIPA - Captain Barry JacksonEN 英文稿

2016 iowa caucus

Nominating Caucus Orientation

1.Australian Indigenous Psychological Association (AIPA)€¦ · Web view · 2017-06-30The Australian Indigenous Psychologists Association (AIPA) applauds the Human Rights Commission

HOUSE REPUBLICAN CAUCUS

South Central Action Area Caucus Group Caucus … Central Action Area Caucus Group Caucus Meeting . ... Annette Frahm King County ECO Net Blair Scott King County ... don’t inadvertently

Opuscolo tiziana aipa colore - aipa-parma.it · responsabile del Centro Emostasi. NOTE GENERALI L’uso di farmaci anticoagulanti orali richiede da parte del pa-ziente la conoscenza

Workshop Running Lean @ AIPA 07/05/2014 Caroline.Huys@ innovatiecentrum.be

Ron McMullin - AIPA

PNWER Profile House Republican Caucus House Democrat Caucus Senate Republican Caucus Senate Democrat Caucus 1 Executive Committee Member Each State Government

01 - Primary and Caucus

nasw black caucus

State Convention Caucus Training

Caucus 101

KOMITMEN AIPA MEMBINA ASEAN SEBAGAI PENERAJU DALAM

LGBT Caucus Survey

2014 Caucus Presentation - Utah

Map - AIPA

Congressional Minority Caucus Reception