Region 10 Accountability and Assessment Updates

Region 10 Accountability and Assessment Updates

April 16, 2014Jana Schreiner, Accountability and

State Assessment Consultant

Agenda, Webinar #10

• Accountability– Final decisions

ACCOUNTABILITY

2014 Development

• Final decisions• ELL inclusion• Accountability sessions www.region10.org

2014 Ratings Labels

Rating based on 4 Indexes

Index 1: Student AchievementIndex 1: Student Achievement provides an overview of student performance based on satisfactory student achievement across all subjects for all students.

2013

Combined over All Subjects: Reading, Mathematics, Writing, Science, and Social Studies.

Student Groups: All Students. Performance Standards: Phase-in 1 Level II

(Satisfactory).

STAAR End-of-Course (EOC) Assessments(15 total): Reading I; Reading II; Reading III Writing I; Writing II; Writing III Algebra l; Geometry; Algebra ll Biology; Chemistry; Physics World Geography; World History; US History

English Language Learners (English and Spanish tests): ELLs in US schools Years 1-3 excluded ELLs in US schools Year 4 or more included

2014

Combined over All Subjects: Reading, Mathematics, Writing, Science, and Social Studies.

Student Groups: All Students. Performance Standards: Phase-in 1 Level II

(Satisfactory).

STAAR End-of-Course (EOC) Assessments (5 total): English l; English ll Algebra l Biology US History

English Language Learners (English and Spanish tests): ELLs in US schools Year 1 excluded ELLs in US schools Year 2 and

beyond included

Index 1: Student Achievement English I and II from Spring 2014 + Include Reading I and II from July 2013 and December

2013• Substitute Assessments EOCs (PSAT, PLAN, SAT, ACT, AP)

Standard at Meeting Final Level II (CCR Standard) Counted as PASSER for Index I Counted as Meeting CCR Standard for Index IV Not used in Index 2 and 3

• Add STAAR M, STAAR ALT, ELL progress measure

• Implementation Schedule (no English at HS)

Index 2: Student Progress focuses on actual student growth independent of overall achievement levels for each race/ethnicity student group, students with disabilities, and English language learners.

By Subject Area: Reading and Mathematics

One point for Met progress levelTwo points for Exceeded progress level

Progress Measures by Subject Area and School Type

New for 2014:No Index 2 for High Schools (9-12 campuses)Inclusion STAAR-Modified, STAAR-AltInclusion of ELL Students

Index 2: Student Progress

Index 2: Student Progress focuses on actual student growth independent of overall achievement levels for each race/ethnicity student group, students with disabilities, and English language learners.

New for 2014: Students who skip grades included

Students who transition from Spanish to English in mathematics included

ELL Denials: Students whose parent(s) have denied ELL services included Considered as Non-ELL student for Index 2

Index 2: Student Progress

2013

Points based on STAAR performance:

Phase-in 1 Level II satisfactory performance: One point for each percent of tests MET Phase-in 1 Level II

By Subject Area: Reading, Mathematics, Writing, Science, and Social Studies.

Student Groups: Economically Disadvantaged Lowest Performing Race/Ethnicity from

2012

Index 3: Closing Performance GapsIndex 3: Closing Performance Gaps emphasizes advanced academic achievement of economically disadvantaged students and the two lowest performing race/ethnicity student groups.

2014

Points based on STAAR performance:

Phase-in 1 Level II satisfactory performance: One point for each percent of tests MET Phase-in 1 Level II

Level III advanced performance:Two points for each percent of tests at the Level III advanced performance standard.

By Subject Area: Reading, Mathematics, Writing, Science, and Social Studies.

Student Groups: Economically Disadvantaged Lowest Performing Race/Ethnicity from 2013…

groups must have 25 tests in reading AND math

Inclusion of ELL Students

Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness

2013 Graduation Score: Combined performance across

the graduation and dropout rates for: Grade 9-12 Four-Year Graduation Rate for All

Students and all student groups; or Grade 9-12 Five-Year Graduation Rate for All

Students and all student groups, whichever contributes the higher number of points to the index.

RHSP/DAP Graduates: All Students and race/ethnicity student groups.

Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness emphasizes the importance of earning a high school diploma that provides students with the foundation necessary for success in college, the workforce, job training programs, or the military; and the role of elementary and middle schools in preparing students for high school.

2014 Graduation Score: Combined performance across the

graduation and dropout rates for: Grade 9-12 Four-Year Graduation Rate for All Students

and all student groups; or Grade 9-12 Five-Year Graduation Rate for All Students

and all student groups, whichever contributes the higher number of points to the index.

RHSP/DAP Graduates: All Students and race/ethnicity student groups.

STAAR Score: STAAR Percent Met Final Level ll for All Students and race/ethnicity student groups.

College ready graduates.

Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness

Indicator All Students

African Amer.

Amer. Indian Asian Hispanic Pacific

Islander WhiteTwo or MoreRaces

ELL Special Ed.

Total Points

Max.Points

STAAR ScoreSTAAR % MetFinal Level ll onTwo or More Tests

29% 16% 40% 23% 38% 36% 182 600

STAAR Score (STAAR total points divided by maximum points) 30

Graduation Score (Gr. 9-12)4-yr. graduation rate 84.3% 78.8% 78.8% 91.6% 86.0% 44.2% 69.8% 533.5 700

5-yr. graduation rate 85.1% 78.8% 80.0% 92.1% 84.0% 48.9% 77.5% 546.4 700

Highest Graduation Total 546.4 700Graduation Score (best of total graduation points divided by maximum points) 78.0

RHSP/DAP Score4-yr. graduationPercent RHSP/DAP 82.7% 76.4% 83.6% 83.0% 325.7 400

RHSP/DAP Score (best of total RHSP/DAP points divided by maximum points) 81.4

Postsecondary/College-Ready Graduates ScoreCollege-Ready Graduates subject (ELA & Math)

82.0% 72.0% 78.0% 89.0% 321.0 400

College-Ready Score (total points divided by maximum points) 80.2

Overall Index ScoreSTAAR Score 30.0

Multiplyby

Weight

Graduation Score 78.0RHSP/DAP Score 81.4College-Ready Score 80.2Index Score (sum of weighted index scores)

55%

5th percentile 5th percentile

Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness

STAAR Level II Final Performance Percent Met Final Level II on Two or More Assessments

Weighting of Indicators:

Post-Secondary Indicator: Percent Met Criteria on ELA AND MATH

Indicator WeightSTAAR Component 25%Graduation 25%Graduation Plan 25%Post-Secondary Indicators 25%

Rating Labels: AEA2014 System Standard accountability labels:

Met Alternative StandardImprovement Required

30%5th percentile5th percentile

Index 4 Targets

• Elementary-12• Middle School-13• High School-18• District--13

• Districts, high schools, and multi-grade campuses-56…..changed to 57 per April 25th posting.

STAAR Component All four components

Distinction Designations2013 Distinction Designation

Campus Top Twenty-Five Percent: Campuses in the top quartile of their campus comparisongroup earn a distinction designation. Student Progress

based on Index 2 Academic Achievement in:

Reading/ELA Mathematics

2014 Distinction Designation

Campus Top Twenty-Five Percent:Campuses in the top quartile of their campus comparison group Student Progress (based on Index 2) Closing Performance Gaps (based on Index 3)

Academic Achievement in: Reading/English Language Arts Mathematics Science Social Studies

Districts and Campuses Postsecondary Readiness:House Bill 5 (83rd Texas Legislature, 2013) expanded distinctionsfor districts and campuses for attainment of postsecondary readiness

Criteria must include indicators based on percentages of students who: Achieve college-readiness standards on STAAR; Earn nationally/internationally recognized business/industry

certification; Complete a coherent sequence of CTE courses; Complete dual credit or a postsecondary course for local

credit; Achieve college readiness standards on SAT, ACT, PSAT, or

ACT-PLAN; Earn college credit based on AP/IB performance.

Accountability Ratings and Distinction Designations

2013 and 2014 Accountability Rating(Districts and Campuses) 2013 Distinction Designations 2014 Distinction Designations

Met Standard

Campuses Only

Student Progress

Academic Achievement: Reading/ELA Mathematics

Districts and CampusesPostsecondary Readiness

Campuses Only

Student Progress Closing Performance Gaps

Academic Achievement: Reading/ELAMathematics

ScienceSocial Studies

Improvement Required N/A N/A

System SafeguardsSafeguard Measures and Targets:

Reporting system disaggregates performance by student group, performance level, and subject area.

Performance rates are calculated from the assessment results used to calculate Index 1: Student Achievement.

2013 targets for the disaggregated system-safeguard results: STAAR performance target corresponds to Index 1 (50%); STAAR participation target required by federal accountability (95%); Federal graduation rate targets and improvement calculations for 4-year rate

(78%) and 5-year rate (83%); and Federal limit on use of alternate assessments (1% and 2%).

26

Indicator Entity All Students

African Amer.

Amer. Indian Asian Hispanic Pacific

Islander White Two or More Races

Eco.Disadv. ELL Special Ed.

Performance Rates*

ReadingState 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55%

Federal 79% 79% n/a n/a 79% n/a 79% n/a 79% 79% 79%

MathematicsState 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55%

Federal 79% 79% n/a n/a 79% n/a 79% n/a 79% 79% 79%

Writing 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55%

Science 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55%

Social Studies 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55%

Participation RatesReading 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95%Mathematics 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95%

Federal Graduation Rates (including improvement targets)4-year 80% 80% 80% 80% 80% 80% 80% 80% 80% 80% 80%5-year 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85%

District Limits on Use of Alternative Assessment Results

ReadingModified 2% Not ApplicableAlternate 1% Not Applicable

MathematicsModified 2% Not ApplicableAlternate 1% Not Applicable

Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

2014 Accountability System Safeguard

Measures and Targets

* Targets for 2014 correspond to the performance target for Index 1: Student Achievement.

Secure Environment

• Staging Data Validation Monitoring in ISAM• Campus pairings for accountability available in

late April

STUDENT ASSESSMENT

• ELL progress measure

• Jana.Schreiner@Region10.org972-348-1480