Profiting from the Poor - WordPress.com

Preview:

Citation preview

Profiting from the Poor: Public Health Lessons from Tobacco

Industry Targeting of Low-Income Women

presented at Te Raukura Te Wharewaka o Poneke

Wellington

Thursday, 26 April, 2012

Stacey J. Anderson, PhD Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences

University of California San Francisco stacey.anderson@ucsf.edu

Overview

• Smoking in low-income populations; low-income women

• Psychographics and target market segments

• Lessons for public health responses

NZ Smoking Rates (2010 Soc Rept)

• 2009: 22% aged 15-64 current smokers

• 2008: 26% male, 22% female

– 49.3% Maori female 2009

• 2009: Maori girls 14-15 yrs 18%

– Halved from 10 yrs prior

– Am Indian teens: 41% boys, 39.4% girls (CDC, 2001)

• Most deprived (NZDep 2006 deciles 9, 10) 2.7x greater than deciles 1, 2

http://socialreport.msd.govt.nz/health/cigarette-smoking.html http://socialreport.msd.govt.nz/documents/health-social-report-2010.pdf

Low-income populations (US)

• 31% adults below federal poverty level (FPL) smoke – 19% at or above FPL (1.45x greater for poor adults)

(CDC, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 59, 2010)

• Unemployed adults: 42% smoke – c. 25% part- or full time employed (1.68x greater for

unemployed) (Halpin et al, Health Aff 2006;25(2):550-6.)

• 26% women below Fed Poverty Level smoke – 17% women at or above FPL (1.53x greater for poor

women) (CDC, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 59, 2010)

California Low-Income Women

Pechman & Wyn UCLA Health Policy Brief, 2009

Legacy Tobacco Documents Library (LTDL) http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu

“Downscale activity”

Int’l Committee on Smoking Issues, RJR 1977, TID pqo85d00

“Much less educated”

Analysis of the Virile Segment, RJR 1986, TID iqd94d00

“The less educated”

PMUSA Five year plan 91-95, PM 1991, TID cbj02a00

“Less educated, working class”

Established brands strategic planning meeting, RJR 1985, TID yrb15d00

“They’re more malleable”

Denicola Research report for RJR, 1989, TID pbs92d00

Analyzing Tobacco Marketing

• Pollay 20th Century Tobacco Ad Collection – http://www.tobacco.org/ads/

• Trinkets and Trash – http://www.trinketsandtrash.org/

• Tobacco Free Kids Ad Gallery – http://www.tobaccofreekids.org/ad_gallery/

• Stanford’s “Not a Cough in a Carload” – http://http://tobacco.stanford.edu/

• Ephemeral sources

Advertising Archives Pollay Ads

http://www.tobacco.org/ads

Trinkets and Trash

http://www.trinketsandtrash.org

Stanford

http://tobacco.stanford.edu

Methods

• Anderson, Dewhirst, & Ling, Tob Control, 2006; 15:254-61

• Documents databases – Targeted search terms relevant to research question

– Documents analysis and snowball searching

• Advertising archives – Chronological analysis

– Theme-based analysis

• Iterative analyses of both databases

Anderson, Dewhirst, & Ling. Every Document and Picture Tells a Story. Tob Control, 2006; 15:254-61

Pricing?

Tobacco Returns Analysis 2010 http://www.ash.org.nz/site_resources/library/Tobacco_industry/Tobacco_Return_Analysis_2010.pdf

Psychographic Segmentation

Philip Morris report on young adult smokers, 1994. TID leg76e00

Psychographic Segmentation

Philip Morris report on young adult smokers, 1994. TID leg76e00

Psychographic Segmentation

1981 RJR Segmentation Study, 1981. TID bor68d00

Price-conscious

William A. Robinson, Inc, for Philip Morris, 1974, TID nah05e00

“Value Price” Brand for Young Women

Tatham Euro RSCG for Brown & Williamson, 1995, TID uid90f00

“Value Price” Brand for Young Women

Tatham Euro RSCG for Brown & Williamson, 1995, TID uid90f00

Functions of Smoking

• Little disposable income – But always $ for cigarettes

• Use cigarettes to cope with low-income circumstances – Stress of limited income

– Childcare/eldercare

– Unemployment

– Limited opportunities for recreation / boredom

– Social exclusion

MacAskill, et al. Soc Marketing Quarterly 2002; 8(1): 19-34

Case Study: Capri

• Relaxation, escape from stresses and cares

• Experientialism, enjoyment, fulfillment

Brown and Williamson, 1980. TID mpc43f00

Capri Target Segments

McCann-Erickson, Inc., 1981. TID wzj13f00

Identify segments’ needs: Smoking behavior of segments:

Capri Brand Positioning

Brown and Williamson TID mgh10f00

Capri Ad Development

Tatham Euro RSCG, 1995. TID yhd90f00

Capri Ad Development and Refinement

Perception Research Services, 1997. TID hut02d00

“They call us Drum Scum”

• Psychological toll of living in economically depressed area

– “They call us Drum [Drumchapel] Scum.”

– “This is the most deprived place in Europe…. We’re living in slums.”

– “dirty, filthy, expensive habit.”

– Health professionals “nagging” or dismissing smokers

Project SCUM

Project SCUM, RJR, 1996, TID ciw66d00

Taking It to the Streets

Yerger, Daniel, & Malone, NTR, 2005;7:163-72

Opportunities: Industry Denormalization

CA Dept Health Services, 1990. http://archive.org/details/tobacco_pcy99d00

Need Age Group Brand/

Campaign

Tobacco Control

Emphasis

Independence,

rebellion,

belonging

18-24 Marlboro (esp.

Lights) Conformity, ostracization

Female

camaraderie /

belonging

20s Virginia Slims

“Woman Thing”

Smoking as women’s

issue,

caring for women

Escape,

relaxation 35-59

Eve

Satin

Capri

Ostracization, addiction,

increase in everyday

problems

Opportunities: Countermarketing

Anderson, Glantz, & Ling, Tob Control, 2005; 14:127-35

Opportunities: Taxation, Pricing

• Price cap on pre-tax cigarettes

– Cap not on retail price

• based on assessment of actual costs each firm faces in its operations

– Address excess profits while allowing for tobacco control measure (excise taxing)

– Increase government revenue by transferring profits from companies to public health

– Could prevent down-trading to cheaper products

Gilmore, Branston, & Sweanor, Tob Control, 2010;19:423-30

Opportunities: Macro-level

• Smoking in context of larger socio-economic problems: TC align w/ other efforts – Invest in improving/increasing educational

opportunities

– Policies to increase job opportunities

– Improve housing standards

– Access to free (and smoke-free) leisure facilities

– Childcare/eldercare support

– Community-based community improvement efforts