PERKINS ACCOUNTABILITY

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

PERKINS ACCOUNTABILITY. New Administrator’s Meeting September 23, 2011 Krishnan Sudharsan Office of Career and Technical Education Michigan Department of Education . PERKINS ACCOUNTABILITY. Title I Core Performance Indicators Title II Tech Prep Indicators. Section 113. Accountability. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

PERKINS ACCOUNTABILITY

New Administrator’s MeetingSeptember 23, 2011

Krishnan SudharsanOffice of Career and Technical Education

Michigan Department of Education

2

PERKINS ACCOUNTABILITY

Title ICore Performance Indicators

Title IITech Prep Indicators

3

Section 113. AccountabilityPurpose

“To establish and support State and local performance accountability systems…to assess the effectiveness of the State and the eligible recipients of the State in achieving statewide progress in career and technical education.”

4

PIV: Accountability Focus

• Indicators of performance must be valid and reliable

• Technical skill assessments aligned with industry-recognized standards

• Local accountability of eligible recipients is required

5

PIV: Accountability Focus

• Local program must agree to accept state adjusted levels of performance or negotiate

• Professional development to assist in accessing and utilizing data

6

• Secretary may withhold all or a portion of a state’s funds if:…– State fails to implement an improvement plan– State fails to make improvement in

performance levels– State fails to meet at least 90% of level of

performance for 3 consecutive years

PIV: Accountability Focus

7

PIV: Accountability Focus

If a local recipient fails to meet at least 90% of a local adjusted level of performance for any of the core indicators, local recipient shall develop and implement a program improvement plan

8

PIV: Accountability Focus• State may withhold all or a portion of a

local recipient’s funding if:– Recipient fails to implement an improvement

plan– Recipient fails to make any improvement in

performance levels– Recipient fails to meet at least 90% of agreed

upon state adjusted level of performance for 3 consecutive years

9

PIV: Accountability Focus

Tech Prep• Each Tech Prep consortium shall enter

into an agreement to meet a minimum level of performance for each of the Title I and Title II performance indicators

10

PIV: Accountability Focus

Tech Prep (Title II)• Consortia that do not meet the

performance levels for 3 consecutive years shall be to required to resubmit a Tech Prep grant application and may have funding terminated*

Tech Prep (Title II) Indicators

• Tech Prep indicator data must be submitted for the 2010-2011 grant year by October 15, 2011

• Tech Prep funding was eliminated for FY 2011-2012. No indicator data will be collected

11

12

Tech Prep Data Collection Logistics

Submit on state-prepared and provided spreadsheet by region

Required: Numbers for all

numerators and denominators

13

Negotiating Local Adjusted Levels of Performance (ALP)-CPIs

• 1S1 Acad. Achievement—Reading/LA• 1S2 Acad. Achievement—Math

–State Perkins targets are NCLB Required Levels

14

Negotiating Local ALP

• 2S1 Technical Skill AttainmentTechnical Skills Assessments

Major changes every year as % of students/programs report increases

15

3S1 High School Completion

• Measure–5 year cohort–‘Regular diploma’ plus

–GED, certificate–State recognized equivalent

16

4S1 High School Graduation

• NCLB Measure• State Perkins target is state NCLB

target• Review participating districts’

performance

17

5S1 Placement

• Postsecondary Education/ Training

• Military Service• Employment

18

6S1 and 6S2 Nontraditional

• Different CIP Codes identified as ‘Nontraditional’ compared to PIII

• 6S1 – Participation• 6S2 - Completion

Reports

• Perkins Core Performance Indicator Reports:

www.CTEISReports.comClick Link: “Core Performance Indicator

Reports”

19

Core Performance Indicator Trends

• www.michigan.gov/OCTE• Click link: “Data and Reports”• Click link: “Michigan Core

Performance Indicators: Trends by Region”

20

21

Technical Skills AssessmentsCurrent Assessments

22

 CTE Cluster/Program 

 Assessment

 Assessment

Items

 Cut Score

 Test Publisher

 Business, Management, Administration (52.0299)

 General Business

 104 QuestionsMultiple Choice

 53 %

 NOCTIhttp://www.nocti.org/

 Finance (52.0800)

 Accounting--Advanced

 222 QuestionsMultiple Choice

 46.6 %

 NOCTIhttp://www.nocti.org/

 Health Sciences (26.0102, 51.0000, 51.1000, 51.0707)

 National Healthcare Foundation Skills

 100 QuestionsMultiple Choice

 70 % National Consortium for

Health Science Educationhttp://www.okcareertech.org/healthtest/

Roles and Responsibilities: Administrator

Prior to Assessment• Communicate assessment value and purpose • Oversee planning for test administration

During Assessment• Monitor administration• Support Proctors

After Assessment• Review assessment results• Use assessment data to improve learning

23

Tools and Resources

MDE OCTE Websitehttp://michigan.gov/mde/0,1607,7-140-6530_2629_53970-247949--,00.html

Business Assessments: NOCTI Website

http://www.nocti.org/michigan.cfm

24

Health Assessment: Oklahoma Career Techhttp://www.okcareertech.org/healthtest/

• Jacqueline Dannis, 517-335-1066– DannisJ@michigan.gov

25

Questions?

Krishnan SudharsanSudharsanK@Michigan.gov

517-241-7652

Recommended