View
57
Download
0
Category
Tags:
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
An International Study of Technology Use in Mathematics and Science Teacher Education. Proudly supported by TLEF. Proudly supported by TLEF. Marina Milner-Bolotin, Jeongho Daniel Cha, Svetlana Bolotin- Chachashvili , Latika Raisinghani Friday, July 12, 2013 IPTEL 2013, UBC. Research Team. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Marina Milner-Bolotin, Jeongho Daniel Cha, Svetlana Bolotin-Chachashvili, Latika Raisinghani
Friday, July 12, 2013IPTEL 2013, UBC
An International Study of Technology Use in Mathematics and Science Teacher Education
Research Team
Teacher Education in Canada and S. Korea
Canada South KoreaLevel Post-Graduate
Concurrent (B.Sc.+B.Ed.)B.Ed. (elem. and sec.)M.Ed. (only for secondary)
Length 4-5 years (B.Sc.) + (8 months to 2 years)
4 years (B.Ed.)2-3 years (M.Ed.)
Certification Provincial NationalMath & Sci. Secondary (2 subjects) Elementary & Secondary (2
subjects)Admission requirements
Depends on the province (65% GPA UBC)
University Entrance Exam &Graduation req. 75% GPA
Bar exams Do not exist Teacher Selection Test (529 for math, 461 for science)
Job guarantee Depends on the province National exam for public school
Technology & Teacher Education
• Teacher-candidates will teach 30+ years• Technology change is exponential• Availability of technology is not enough• Kids struggle with math and science• Technology is changing the world, should it
change our schools?• Should we prepare teacher-candidates for it?
Paradox of 21st Century Teacher Education
Teacher educators many of whom were born BC (Before Computers) prepare future teachers…
It is a big challenge to keep up with the technological developments. It is also impossible to envision the technologies of the future, so how do we prepare teachers?
Goals of the Study
(a) To investigate the extent of technology integration in relevant methods courses in TEPs in Canada and South Korea
(b) To examine Math and Science teacher-educators’ attitudes about technology integration and their relationship to teacher-educators’ use of technology.
Theoretical Framework
Mishra & Koehler, 2007
Theoretical Framework
Modified Technological-Pedagogical Content Knowledge Framework
Methods
• Countries: Canada and South Korea• Online survey to math & science TEP instructors• Instructors were contacted via e-mail
Canada South KoreaParticipants N Canada= 28 N S. Korea= 27
Estimated % of total population
22% 21%
Survey - Development
• Validated by a team of experts• Internal consistency checked (Cronbach's alpha =
0.88)• Reliability checked - pilot • Online survey: Survey Qualtrics software used• SPSS used to analyze data
Survey - I
Survey - II
Survey - III
Survey - IV
Survey - V
Survey - VI
Survey - VII
Survey - VIII
Survey - IX
Survey - VI
Study Variables
• Independent variables:– Demographic variables– Teaching background variables
• Dependent variables:– Uses of educational technologies– Attitudes about educational technologies
Results and Discussion
Teaching Experience
Canada South Korea0%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
<10 years 54% < 10 years
44%
11+ years 46% 11 + years
56%
Results and Discussion
Main Findings
• No significant differences were found between the countries
• Teacher educators are interested in using technology and exhibit positive attitudes about it
• They are interested in Pro-D opportunities• Positive correlation between attitudes towards
technology and its use (r=0.355, p=0.008)• Extensive use of technology doesn’t lead to the
disappointment with it…
Conclusions
1. Focus on the use of technology within the subjects
2. Examine the implications of technology use in Math and Science
3. Teacher-educators’ attitudes should be taken seriously
4. Support for teacher-educators is crucial 5. Technology implementation across different
subject areas should be explored
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2007). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK): Confronting the wicked problems of teaching with technology. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (Vol. 2007, pp. 2214–2226). Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/24919/
Resources
Results and DiscussionTeaching Experience
Canada South Korea0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
less than 1011 and more
The Generation Gap: Teachers & Students
Recommended