Jaeyoung Lee Dr. Mohamed Abdel-Aty Ph.D Dr. Mohamed Ahmed …

Preview:

Citation preview

Jaeyoung Lee, Ph.D Candidate

Dr. Mohamed Abdel-Aty, Ph.D

Dr. Mohamed Ahmed, Ph.D

Traffic Safety under Reduced Visibility 2

• Florida is among the top state in the US regarding traffic safety

problems resulting from adverse visibility conditions due to

fog/smoke and heavy rain.

Crashes due to Reduced Visibility

2,664

2,052

2,021

Texas

Fl

California

Number of Fatal Crashes due to Fog/Smoke/Rain in 2001-2010

Traffic Safety under Reduced Visibility 3

Pile-up Crash on I-75 in 2012

• Recently, 10 people were killed and another 18 were injured

from fog/smoke related pile-up crash on I-75 near Gainesville

(Jan 29, 2012).

Traffic Safety under Reduced Visibility 4

Severity of Visibility related Crashes

• Generally, Crashes due to reduced visibility from fog/smoke

are more severe compared to non-fog related crashes.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

PDOPossible Injury

Non-incapacitatingInjury

IncapacitatingInjury

Fatality

51%

24%

17%

7%

1%

42%

20%23%

10%

5%

Clear Vision

Fog or Smoke

Traffic Safety under Reduced Visibility 5

Temporal Distributions (1/4)

• Hourly distribution of fog crashes shows that early hours of

dawn & subsequent hours where fog is prominent (5-8 AM).

4% 4%6% 6%

5%

12%

23%

21%

6%

1%0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1%

2% 2% 2%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

Cra

sh P

erc

ent

age

Military Hours (24h)

Fog

CVState Roads (2005-2010) in Florida

Traffic Safety under Reduced Visibility 6

Temporal Distributions (2/4)

• Hourly distribution of smoke crashes does not show any

obtrusive patterns, which implies smoke crashes do not occur

at specific time period.

2% 3% 3%2% 2% 2%

3%

10%

5%6%

5% 5%4%

7% 6%5%

4% 5% 5%

3%2%

5% 5%

3%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

Cra

sh P

erc

enta

ge

Military Hours (24h)

Smoke

CVState Roads (2005-2010) in Florida

Traffic Safety under Reduced Visibility 7

Temporal Distributions (3/4)

• Monthly distribution of fog crashes indicated nearly 60% of

fog crashes occurs during the winter period, from Dec to Feb.

24%

14%

9%

5% 5%

2% 2% 2%2%

7%9%

20%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Cra

sh P

erc

enta

ge

Month

Fog

CVState Roads (2005-2010) in Florida

Traffic Safety under Reduced Visibility 8

Temporal Distributions (4/4)

• Monthly distribution of smoke crashes showed it most

frequently occurs in May which is the dry period.

8% 8%6%

10%

25%

7%8%

4%

6%7%

5%

8%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Cra

sh P

erc

enta

ge

Month

Smoke

CVState Roads (2005-2010) in Florida

Traffic Safety under Reduced Visibility 9

Spatial Distributions (1/3)

• Kernel density estimation was used to identify fog/smoke

crash hotspots.

Cluster County Cluster County

1 Pinellas, Hillsborough & Pasco 7 Miami-Dade & Broward

2 Polk & Osceola 8 Lee & Charlotte

3 Duval 9 Glades & Hendry

4 Leon 10 Bay

5 Alachua 11 Brevard & Orange

6 Orange

Traffic Safety under Reduced Visibility 10

Hotspot Identification in Florida

Traffic Safety under Reduced Visibility 10

Traffic Safety under Reduced Visibility 11

Spatial Distributions (2/3)

• 11 hotspots were magnified and divided highways into one

mile segments and thus FS crashes were counted based on the

segments.

Traffic Safety under Reduced Visibility 12

Spatial Distributions (3/3)

• Segment 2 on I-75 were identified as a fog/smoke crash

hotspot using previous crash data (2005-2010), the pile-up

crash occurred due to fog & smoke involving large trucks at

the very same location.

• Thus, this crash could be avoided

if appropriate treatments were

conducted, proactively.

Traffic Safety under Reduced Visibility 13

Contributing Factors (1/3)

• Fog crashes are more frequent at the roadway with poor

lighting condition, divided median, and at segments (not

intersections) in the rural area.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

DaylightDusk

DawnDark (street

lighting) Dark (nostreet

lighting)

24%

2%

18% 20%

36%

68%

2%1%

21%

7%

Fog

CV

Fog crashes by lighting conditions

Traffic Safety under Reduced Visibility 14

Contributing Factors (2/3)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

State HighwayLocal Roadway

54%

46%

59%

41%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

UrbanRural

48% 52%

85%

15%

Fog

CV

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

DividedUndivided

41%

59%55%

45%

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%

SegmentAt

intersection Influencedby

intersection

56%

39%

5%

45% 47%

8%

Fog crashes by roadway types Fog crashes by community types

Fog crashes by median types Fog crashes by locations

Traffic Safety under Reduced Visibility 15

Contributing Factors (3/3)

• Smoke crashes are more frequent at the roadway with poor

lighting condition, and at segments (not at intersections) in the

rural area.

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

Daylight Dusk Dawn Dark (streetlighting)

Dark (no streetlighting)

57%

1% 7%15% 20%

68%

2% 1%

21%7%

Smoke

CV

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Urban Rural

49% 51%

85%

15%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

Segment At intersection Influenced byintersection

70%

25%

5%

45% 47%

8%

Traffic Safety under Reduced Visibility 16

Frequent Crash Types in Fog Crashes

• Fog crashes lead to more severe injuries and are associated

with rear-end crashes compared to crashes in clear vision (CV)

conditions.

• Moreover, multivehicle, rear-end, head-on or angle crashes

occurring in foggy conditions have significantly higher

probability to result in severe crashes.

0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50

Severe injury

Rear-end

Severe injury × Multiple

Severe injury × Rear-end

Severe injury × Head-on

Severe injury × Angle

1.88

1.40

2.06

2.04

1.63

1.81

Odds ratio of crash types and their interactions in fog to CV crash

Traffic Safety under Reduced Visibility 17

Frequent Crash Types in Smoke Crashes

• Smoke crashes lead to more severe injury crashes and are

associated with multiple, rear-end and head-on crashes.

• In addition, multivehicle, rear-end or head-on or angle crashes

occurring in smoky conditions have higher probability to result

in severe crashes.

0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00

Severe injury

Multiple vehicle

Rear-end

Head-on

Severe injury × Multiple vehicle

Severe injury × Rear-end

Severe injury × Head-on

1.21

1.10

1.15

1.03

2.99

1.64

1.07

Odds ratio of crash types and their interactions in smoke to CV crash

Traffic Safety under Reduced Visibility 18

Summary (1/3)

• Florida is among the top state in the US regarding traffic

safety problems resulting from adverse visibility conditions

due to fog/smoke and heavy rain.

• Crashes due to reduced visibility from fog/smoke are more

severe compared to non-fog related crashes.

• Fog crashes occur mostly in the morning in Dec to Feb,

whereas smoke related crashes occur most frequently in May.

Traffic Safety under Reduced Visibility 19

Summary (2/3)

• Roadway with poor lighting condition, undivided segments

(not at intersection) in the rural area has the increased

probability of fog/smoke crash occurrence.

• Through the macroscopic analysis, we can understand the big

picture of fog/smoke crashes, and more specific segments

with frequent fog/smoke crashes can be identified through

micro-level analysis.

Traffic Safety under Reduced Visibility 20

Summary (3/3)

• Both fog and smoke crashes lead to more severe injuries

compared to crashes in CV conditions.

• Furthermore, multivehicle, rear-end, head-on or angle crashes

occurring in foggy conditions have significantly higher

probability to result in severe crashes.

Jaeyoung Lee, Ph.D Candidate

Dr. Mohamed Abdel-Aty, Ph.D

Dr. Mohamed Ahmed, Ph.D

Recommended