INFLUENCE OF THE PELLETIZING PROCESS PARAMETERS ON …€¦ · sF s s 2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0.004...

M.Sc. Zheni Radeva, Dr.-Ing. Peter Müller , Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. Jürgen Tomas

INFLUENCE OF THE PELLETIZING PROCESS PARAMETERS

ON THE MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF RECEIVED ALUMINA

OXIDE PELLETS

Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany, Institute of Process Engineering, Mechanical Process Engineering, zheni.radeva@ovgu.de

I. Introduction

II. Materials : Primary particles and binder

Pelletizing is a common process to optimize the mechanical properties of various powder

materials. Industrially produced alumina oxide (γ-Al2O3) granules are used here as primary

model particles for the pelletizing process, carried out in a laboratory rotating pan-pelletizer

(spheronizer) at constant processing time of 20 minutes. Solution of viscoelastic polymer -

hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) is used as binder. Its concentration was increased

until finding of the most suitable binder content for the model pellets. The rotational

velocity of the pan-pelletizer was varied in order to find the optimal speed, which provides

pellets with improved properties. The influence of the process parameter on the received

pellet product properties like density and porosity, size distribution, breakage characteristics

and breakage probability was analysed.

III. Experimental setup

IV. Results and discussion

It was clearly shown that the change in the rotational velocity of the bottom rotating disk and the amount of

added binder exert an enormous influence on the mechanical properties of the received agglomerated product.

It was proven that larger pellets can be obtained by increasing the binder amount.

Strong and compact pellets can be produced at large rotational velocities.

The binder content in the pellet increases its breakage resistance, but changes the breakage behaviour because of

the binder's plasticity and proves to be more problematic in case of binder addition to the batch of primary

particles.

Future outlook: V. Conclusions

2. Compression Test

1. Pelletizing

1. Light and scanning electron microscopy of the produced pellets

3. Force-displacement behaviour and breakage probability

As future outlook, an investigation of the influence of the primary particle diameter on the mechanical

properties of the pellets is suggested.

The influence of different binders will be proved in future research.

In order to understand better the process of breakage of the pellet by compression, DEM simulations

should be accomplished in future.

Specific mass-related Breakage energy

Em =EBMP= (ρPVP)

−1 F s ds

sB

s0

γ-Al2O3 properties

diameter (mm) 1.0

crush strength (MPa) 45

bulk density (g/m3) 740-820

porosity (%) 75

Hypromellose

(HPMC) Solution

- non Newtonian fluid -pseudoplastic behavior

- prepared by directly dissolving HPMC

powder into distilled water

AMW

(g/mol) pH chemical reactivity

748.807 5.0-7.5

combustible and react

vigorously with oxidizing

agents

Critical velocity : ωcrit

=μ

R∗gr

, rad/s ; Vcrit

=ra∗ω

crit, m/s

Force balance

Fn=0=F

c−F

R ; F

c−μ

R∗ F

G+F

A

O

=0; Fc=m

P∗r∗ω2;F

R=μ

R∗(F

G+F

A

O

)

The breakage test was carried out using special equipment provided by Ewete, Germany.

The loading velocity ν was fixed to 0.05 mm/s.

In order to perform a reliable compression test the pellet has to take an initial stable

position. During the stressing a deformed contact area will be developed between the

pellet and the piston.

The roughness of the irregularly shaped pellet is considered as a distribution of

hemispherical asperities with the curve radius (diameter) of the primary particles d <

dpellet that forms the surface of the pellet3. Thus for the approach, one may assume

characteristic, microscopically smooth, hemispherical asperities, whose curves are

equivalent to the primary particles so that the force-displacement models of Hertz and

Tomas can be applied2.

1.0

mm

Solid bridges formed from

consolidated binder

Primary particles (Al2O3)

Solid bridge bond

400 μm 400 μm

Solid

bridge bond

1 mm 1 mm

2. Influence of process parameters on the pellet cumulative size distribution

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 5 10 15 20 25

Pa

rtic

le s

ize

dis

trib

uti

on

Q3

in %

Pellet size d50,3 in mm

0.17 m/s

0.37 m/s

0.74 m/s

Rotational tip velocity

d50,3i

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 5 10 15 20 25

Pa

rtic

le s

ize

dis

trib

uti

on

Q3

in %

Pellet size d50,3 in mm

0.027 g/g

0.053 g/g

0.0109 g/g

Binder content

d50,3i

Elastic: Hertz law1 Fel =2

3E∗ R∗

s

2

3

=4

3

E1

1 − ν12 R1

s

2

3

=1

3

E1

1 − ν12 d1s

3

Elastic-plastic: Tomas2 Fel−pl,w−p−w = λel − pl πR1pF 1 −1

3

sFs

s

2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

0.004 0.009 0.014 0.019 0.024 0.029

Forc

e in

N

Displacement in mm

Exp.valus

Hertz

Tomas

values

Force-displacement diagram for γ-Al2O3 pellets with d50,3=2.5 mm,

produced at rotational velocity 0.37 m/s, 20 min processing time and

binder content 0.053 g/g

Breakage

point

sB s0

EBi = F(s)dssB

s0

Elastic

deformation

Elastic-plastic

deformation

Yield

point 1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

0 0.05 0.1 0.15

Ela

stic

mo

du

lus

E1 i

n M

Pa

Binder content in g/g

0

200

400

600

800

0 0.05 0.1 0.15

Ela

stic

co

nta

ct s

tiff

nes

s k

n,e

l

Binder content in g/g

Elastic modulus E1 and elastic contact stiffness kn,el as function of the binder content

El-pl. contact stiffness kn,el-pl and fracture strength σB as a function of the binder content

0

200

400

600

800

0 0.05 0.1 0.15

El-

pl.

co

nta

ct s

tiff

nes

s k

n,e

l-p

l

Binder content in g/g

0

5

10

15

0 0.05 0.1 0.15

Fra

ctu

re s

tren

gth

σB i

n M

Pa

Binder content in g/g

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

Bre

ak

ag

e p

rob

ab

ilit

y P

Mass-related breakage energy in J/kg

0.17 exp.values

0.37 exp.values

0.74 exp.values

0.17 lognormal fit

0.37 lognormal fit

0.74 lognormal fit

Rotational tip velocity in m/s

Em,50i

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

0 500 1000

Bre

ak

ag

e p

rob

ab

ilit

y P

Mass-related breakage energy in J/kg

0.027 exp.values

0.053 exp. values

0.109 exp.values

0.027 lognormal fit

0.053 lognormal fit

0.109 lognormal fit

Em,50i

Binder content in g/g

1 H. Hertz „Ueber die Berühung fester elastischer Körper, J. reine u.angew. Math. 1881, 92, 156-171; 2 J.Tomas: Zur Mechanik trockener kohäsiver Schüttgüter, Schüttgut 2002, 8(6), 522-537; 3 S.Aman, J.Tomas and H. Kalman „Breakage probability of irregularly shaped particles“ Chem.Eng. Science, 2010. 65(5):p. 1503-1512.

deq =4A

π

Elastic modulus E1 and elastic contact stiffness kn,el as function of the tip velocity ν

600

800

1000

1200

1400

0 0.5 1

Ela

stic

mo

du

lus

E1 i

n M

Pa

Rotational tip velocity in m/s

0

200

400

600

0 0.5 1

Ela

stic

co

nta

ct s

tiff

nes

s k

n,e

l

Rotational tip velocity in m/s

El-pl. contact stiffness kn,el-pl and fracture strength σB as a function of the tip velocity ν

0

200

400

600

0 0.5 1

El-

pl.

co

nta

ct s

tiff

nes

s k

n,e

l-p

l

Rotational tip velocity in m/s

0

5

10

15

0 0.5 1

Fra

ctu

re s

tren

gth

σB i

n

MP

a

Rotational tip velocity in m/s

0.109

*

* Cowork with M.Sc. Reihaneh Pashmineh, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg Germany, Institute of Process Engineering, Chair „Thermal Process Engineering“