View
16
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
Assessments
Confidentiality of Participant’s Results.
(1) Skyfactor may share Participant’s results with other institutions as part of its bench-
marking services provided that Skyfactor shall disguise the identity of Participant when using
Participant’s results for benchmarking by various methods which may include: (1) scrambling
the order of institutions; (2) refraining from labeling institutions; (3) providing comparisons only
within groups of institutions; and (4) refraining from the release of raw data for individual institu-
tions.
(2) Participant may share and utilize Participant’s results in any respect subject to the
following restrictions: Names of comparison institutions, question and factor ranking, question
and factor means, comparison with “Select 6” comparison institutions, Carnegie classification,
“All Institutions” or any other grouping in the study is considered “Restricted Information”. Re-
stricted Information may only be disclosed to: (i) Offices or staff internal to Participant
(including its advisory boards/committees), (ii) external consultants of Participant, to the extent
necessary for the performance of the consultant’s services, and (iii) regional/national/discipline
specific accrediting organizations or legislative review processes, if applicable. Participant
shall inform all such parties of the confidentiality requirements.
SKYFACTOR BENCHWORKS ASSESSMENT TERMS & CONDITIONS
Revised 3/25/2015
We appreciate your interest and participation in the AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment. Rigorous, research-based assessments can unlock the power of assessment results to improve your institution's performance. Our assessments provide targeted,analysis-backed insights to measure your performance and guide your improvement efforts. Skyfactor's Benchworks analysis identifies whereyou should focus your time, money and resources to improve the overall quality of the student experience and help each student thrive.
OUR MISSION
To empower college educators to positively impact student retention, success, learning and satisfaction; toimprove the overall quality of the college student experience.
Since 1994, Skyfactor has been dedicated to improving retention, student success, and the quality of the collegestudent experience. Skyfactor has empowered over 1,500 college and universities to impact student development,learning, retention and satisfaction through the Mapworks® student success and retention platforms, and throughnational benchmarking assessments for accreditation and continuous improvement. Mapwork’s retentioneffectiveness is grounded in theory, research and statistical methods. Benchworks assessment programs arerooted in accreditation and professional standards and in principles of continuous improvements. Skyfactor offersover 60 nationally benchmarked academic and student affairs assessments as well as Mapworks, acomprehensive student success and retention platform. Skyfactor’s Mapworks and Benchworks assessments arethe essential foundation of an effective assessment and student success initiative. To learn more about Skyfactorand our history, please visit http://www.Skyfactor.com/about/history.
IN PARTNERSHIP WITH AACN
In partnership with AACN, Skyfactor has designed sophisticated, user-friendly benchmarking assessments basedon CCNE standards for accreditation. Using these standards, our nursing assessments provide you with the insightyou need to make targeted, meaningful changes backed by hard data.
Commitment to Assessment // Your institution partnered with Skyfactor Benchworks to participate in the AACN/Benchworks UndergraduateNursing Education Exit Assessment. Assessment is a process to collect information to better understand the perceptions of your institution’seffectiveness from the viewpoint of your campus constituents. Assessment information answers important questions such as “How effective isour program?” or “Where should we focus resources to improve?”
Focusing only on your institution’s performance can be limiting; questions such as “Is improvement possible?” are difficult to answer withoutbenchmarking information. Benchmarking, a key feature in this project, provides comparisons between your institution and others (externalbenchmarking), between successive years (longitudinal benchmarking), and between groups (internal benchmarking). Benchmarking allows youto identify comparative strengths and weaknesses.
THE POWER OF ASSESSMENT AND BENCHMARKING
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment 1©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Closing the Assessment Loop // Successful assessment projects combine data collection, analysis, action planning, and implementation ofactions. Unfortunately, most assessment projects end after studying the assessment results without creating and implementing actions forimprovement. We recommend the following steps:
IMPLEMENT ACTION PLAN //Assign a person(s) to each action and hold
them accountable for their area ofresponsibility.
CONDUCT ASSESSMENT // Using a surveyinstrument that reliably measures areasimportant to your profession is a critical
first step.
CREATE ACTION PLAN //Develop an Action Plan for program
improvement based on these results.
ANALYZE INFORMATION //Carefully review the analysis (both written andonline) to understand issues facing yourprogram and where your program should focusits attention.
Skyfactor provides two reporting platforms for your convenience.
Skyfactor Benchworks’ Written Report // Skyfactor Benchworks’ written report is segmented into four major areas:• Confidentiality Statement: (Located on the first page of this written report.) All results are confidential and may be reproduced and
utilized only for continuous improvement purposes on your campus.• Assessment Summary: This section contains supplemental information to assist you in understanding the results such as a glossary of
terms, list of survey questions and factors, description of the statistical analysis used, external benchmarking groups, and survey responserates.
• Executive Summary: Skyfactor recommends you begin your review of the results with this section. All the major components are pulledtogether to give an excellent overview of your institution’s current performance, external benchmarking comparisons, longitudinal trends,and areas on which to focus resources for improvement. Be sure to identify individual factors key to institutional improvement and anypopulations (e.g., gender, race) with specific issues in order to target actions as necessary.
• Individual Factor Analysis: Once key factors are identified, explore them in-depth to better understand their current and pastperformance. In addition, detailed information of the factor’s scaled questions is reported. Actions should be targeted towards scaledquestions which are more tangible and directly actionable.
Skyfactor Benchworks’ Online Reports // If you would like to delve deeper into your assessment information, Skyfactor Bechworks’ OnlineReports provides additional information (e.g., population characteristics) and interactive tools (e.g., filtering and cross-tabs) to enrich yourunderstanding of the results.
Summary // Assessment and benchmarking helps focus your time and financial resources for greatest impact and moves your institution from adebate about what is wrong to a discussion of possible solutions. Closing the assessment loop by creating and implementing improvementactions guarantees forward progress.
THE POWER OF ASSESSMENT AND BENCHMARKING
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment 2©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Assessment Summary
Executive SummaryOverall SatisfactionOverall LearningOverall Program Effectiveness
SATI
SFAC
TION
FACTOR 1 // Quality of Nursing Instruction
FACTOR 2 // Work and Class Size
FACTOR 3 // Course Lecture and Interaction
FACTOR 4 // Facilities and Administration
FACTOR 5 // Classmates
FACTOR 6 // Advisor
LEAR
NING
FACTOR 7 // Professional Values
FACTOR 8 // Core Competencies
FACTOR 9 // Technical Skills
FACTOR 10 // Core Knowledge
FACTOR 11 // Role Development
OVER
ALL
FACTOR 12 // Overall Satisfaction
FACTOR 13 // Overall Learning
FACTOR 14 // Overall Program Effectiveness
MIS
C Non-Factor Questions
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East ©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Below is a compilation of terms used in this report.
% Total // Relative size of the respondent population.
All Institution Mean // Mean of the aggregated results of all participating institutions.
Carnegie Class Mean // Mean of the aggregated results of the institutions in your Carnegie Classification. If the number of institutions in theclass is two or fewer, the results will not be reported to protect anonymity.
Categorical Questions // Categorical questions are closed-ended questions that ask the respondent to choose an answer(s) that best representtheir situation. Typical categorical questions are age, gender, and class standing
Contribution // The “contribution to the variance” as explained through the regression analysis. Essentially, this refers to the amount eachpredictor contributes to the overall variance. The larger the contribution, the larger the impact the factor has on the dependent factor.
Factor // A group of statistically-related questions which describe a broad concept more completely than just a single question.
Goal // The goal value, set by Skyfactor, is a value of 5.50 on a 7-point scale or a value of 75% on the performance scale. Different performanceindicators are given based on its relationship with the goal. indicates that the goal was met. indicates the goal is within reach. indicatesthe performance is well below goal.
Mean // The average (the sum of the values divided by the number of respondents) of the item.
Mean Range // The difference between the minimum mean (Min) and maximum mean (Max) across populations provides a range of meanswhich gives a measure of the variation of the data.
N // Number of respondents to that item.
Negative Correlation (NEG) // The relationship between an independent factor and the dependent factor where the factors move in oppositedirections. In other words if the factor’s mean decreases, then we would expect the mean of the overall performance factor to increase.
Non-Factor Questions // Scaled questions that are relevant but not statistically related to a factor. Results of these questions are reportedindividually.
Not a Predictor (NP) // A factor which does not contribute to the variance thus is not a predictor of the dependent variable. Because this factoris not a predictor, changes to its performance will not impact the dependent factor.
Not Reported (NR) // In order to protect participant anonymity, Skyfactor will not report population data when the number in that population isfive or fewer. In order to protect institutional anonymity, Skyfactor will not report performance values for the Carnegie Class if the number ofinstitutions in the class is two or fewer.
Performance // Mean scaled from 0-100%. The translation is: “1” on the 7-point scale equates with 0% performance, “4” equates to 50%performance, and “7” equates to 100% performance.
Predictor // Predictor status of the factor as calculated from the regression analysis. The strongest predictor is labeled as “1st”, the secondstrongest is “2nd”, and so forth. We label factors that do not contribute to the variance as “NP” (non-predictor).
Rank // Sorting the institutions from highest performance to lowest performance, your institution’s rank is determined. Note, your institution’sdata is included when we calculate your institution’s ranking within that comparison group (e.g., your institution’s Select 6 rank is out of 7institutions since your institution is included in the rank).
Response Rate // The number of participants who completed the assessment divided by the total number of participants attempted to survey.
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment Survey Summary // 4©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Scaled Questions // These survey questions rely on a 1-to-7 Likert scale with "1" indicating either strong disagreement or being verydissatisfied and "7" indicating either strong agreement or being very satisfied. This type of question is designed to gather perceptions of theparticipants across a variety of content areas.
Select 6 Mean // Mean of the aggregated results of the Select 6 institutions.
Standard Deviation // The measure of the variation in response values within that item. Small standard deviations indicate consistency amongrespondents. In these cases, any intervention taken can be the same for all populations since respondents are responding similarly. Largestandard deviations indicate wide variability among respondents. A deeper understanding of which populations are creating this variability isnecessary before an intervention can begin. May be abbreviated as Std Dev in reporting.
Statistical Significance (Stat Sig) // The indication of a statistical difference in means. Statistical testing is conducted between yourinstitution’s current results and the results from previous years to determine if differences in the means are statistically significant. indicateswhere your institution performed statistically higher; indicates no statistical difference; and indicates where your institution performedstatistically lower. Statistical testing is also conducted between populations and between other institutions when applicable.
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment Survey Summary // 5©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
There are three types of questions used in this assessment: Categorical Questions, Scaled Questions, and Open-Ended Questions. Below is a fulllisting of the survey items grouped by question type.
Categorical Questions // Categorical questions are closed-ended questions that ask the respondent to choose an answer(s) that best representstheir situation. Typical categorical questions are GPA, Class Standing, and Place of Residence. Below are the categorical questions asked in thisassessment. In this written report, Skyfactor has chosen to report detailed information on a few key items marked with an asterisk; reporting byall categorical questions can be found in Skyfactor Benchworks’ Online Reports.
D001 // What type of BSN did you complete at this institution?D002 // What is your gender? *D003 // How old are you?D004 // What is your ethnicity?MR005 // What is your race? (Choose all that apply.)D006 // Race/Ethnicity (reporting only) *D007 // Are you an international student (Non-Resident Alien)?D008 // Did either of your parents/guardians graduate from college?D009 // How many years of full-time health related work experience did you have prior to entering this program? *D010 // Did you complete the majority of this program as a full-time or part-time student?D011 // What was your SAT Math+Verbal or ACT Composite score? (highest score if you took multiple tests) *D012 // What is your cumulative GPA? *D013 // In an average week, how many hours do you spend working (in a paid job and/or work-study)?D014 // In an average week, how many hours do you spend studying/out-of-class school work (e.g., homework, lab time)?D015 // Do you plan to pursue additional education?D016 // What are your immediate plans for employment upon graduation from this institution?D017 // Percentage of instructors in your clinical nursing courses you rate as excellentD018 // Percentage of instructors in your clinical nursing courses you rate as poorD019 // Percentage of instructors in your classroom nursing courses you rate as excellentD020 // Percentage of instructors in your classroom nursing courses you rate as poor:D021 // Which best describes your current stage in the employment search process?D023 // How far away from this institution are you seeking employment?D024 // Which best describes the kind of organization where you plan to work?D025 // What is the total amount of loans taken to finance this degree?D026 // From the time of your graduation, how long do you anticipate it will take to pay off your students loans?D029 // Do you plan to pursue additional education?D030 // Which best describes your current stage in the application process?D094 // Which best describes how you took classes while completing this degree?
Scaled Questions // These survey questions rely on a 1-to-7 Likert scale with “1” indicating either strong disagreement or being Extremely and“7” indicating either strong agreement or being Not at all. These questions are designed to gather perceptions of the participants across a varietyof content areas. The scaled questions from the survey are listed below.
To what degree:Q027 // Are you experiencing stress regarding paying off your student loansQ028 // Do you anticipate problems making your student loan payments
Rate the quality of the BSN program regarding:Q032 // Teaching in your clinical coursesQ033 // Teaching in your classroom coursesQ034 // Feedback on assignments (other than grades) you received from instructors in your clinical coursesQ035 // Feedback on assignments (other than grades) you received from instructors in your classroom coursesQ036 // Extent to which your senior clinical experience built on the foundation laid in previous nursing coursesQ037 // Accessibility of faculty outside classQ038 // Faculty responsiveness to student concerns
How satisfied are you with the faculty's ability to:Q039 // Relate concepts to the real worldQ040 // Draw on experience of studentsQ041 // Engage students in discussionsQ042 // Communicate effectivelyQ043 // Effectively sequence content of coursesQ044 // Interact with studentsQ045 // Act as effective role models in clinical practice
How satisfied are you with the:Q046 // Amount of work required of you in your classroom coursesQ047 // Amount of work required of you in your clinical coursesQ048 // Amount of collaboration required in your coursesQ049 // Value you derived from your collaboration experiences
SURVEY ITEMS
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment Survey Summary // 6©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Regarding your fellow students how satisfied were you with their:Q050 // Academic abilityQ051 // Ability to work in study groupsQ052 // Level of camaraderieQ053 // Academic integrityQ054 // Amount of work experienceQ055 // Quality of work experience
Regarding the school of nursing, how satisfied are you with the:Q056 // Medical computer technologyQ057 // Training to use medical computer technologyQ058 // Responsiveness of the program administration to student concernsQ059 // Tuition/fee level of the programQ060 // Program course scheduleQ061 // Career placementQ062 // Financial aid
To what degree was your academic advisor knowledgeable about:Q063 // Course requirements for majorQ064 // Degree requirementsQ065 // Campus resources for personal, academic, or financial problems
To what degree did your non-nursing courses enhance your ability to:Q066 // Integrate theories and concepts from liberal education into nursing practice.Q067 // Value the ideal of lifelong learning to support excellence in nursing practice.
To what degree did the nursing program teach you to:Q068 // Understand how health care delivery systems are organizedQ069 // Apply research based knowledge as a basis for practiceQ070 // Integrate theory to develop a foundation for practiceQ071 // Make effective presentationsQ072 // Use appropriate technologies to assess patientsQ073 // Understand the effects of health policies on diverse populationsQ074 // Understand the global health care environmentQ075 // Incorporate knowledge of cost factors when delivering careQ076 // Communicate with healthcare professionals to deliver high quality patient careQ077 // Work with inter-professional teamsQ078 // Assess predictive factors that influence the health of patientsQ079 // Provide culturally competent careQ080 // Support fairness in the delivery of careQ081 // Assist patients to interpret the meaning of health informationQ082 // Act as an advocate for vulnerable patientsQ083 // Demonstrate accountability for your own actionsQ084 // Honor the right of patients to make decisions about their health careQ085 // Incorporate nursing standards into practiceQ086 // Apply an ethical decision-making framework to clinical situationsQ087 // Provide physical support in preparation for therapeutic proceduresQ088 // Provide emotional support in preparation for therapeutic proceduresQ089 // Provide pain reduction measuresQ090 // Manage woundsQ091 // Evaluate individual's ability to assume responsibility for self careQ092 // Assist patients to achieve a peaceful end of lifeQ093 // Delegate nursing care while retaining accountability
To what degree did the online course/technology provide:Q095 // Easy-to-use softwareQ096 // Software that was functionalQ097 // Interaction between you and your instructorQ098 // Interaction among classmates
Regarding your experience at the nursing school, to what degree:Q100 // Would you recommend the nursing school to a close friend?Q101 // Did the nursing school provide a positive academic experience?Q102 // Were you challenged to do your best academic work?Q103 // Were you motivated to do your best academic work?Q104 // Was the information you learned applicable to your future career?Q105 // Comparing the expense to the quality of your education, rate the value of the investment made in your degree.
SURVEY ITEMS
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment Survey Summary // 7©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Open-End Questions // Open-ended questions are designed to encourage a full, meaningful answer from the respondent. Typical open-endedquestions are “How can we improve this program?” Below are the open-ended questions asked on this survey; please access SkyfactorBenchworks' Online Reports to read or download respondents’ answers.
LA022 // If you have accepted a position, please tell us the organization name and the programLA031 // If you have decided where you'll be studying, please tell us the institution name and the program:LA099 // Please tell us how we can improve your online educational experienceLA106 // What did you like best about the nursing program?LA107 // How can we improve the nursing program for future students?LA108 // Which person(s) in the nursing program contributed most to your success?LA109 // Please provide any additional comments regarding your degree program.
SURVEY ITEMS
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment Survey Summary // 8©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Factors, also called constructs, are groupings of related scaled questions. Skyfactor utilizes factors for two important reasons:• Reduces complexity: The number of questions in this assessment is large making analysis based solely on survey questions complex
and unwieldy. The number of factors is significantly smaller, bundling the details and reducing the complexity of analysis;• Strengthen regression: The focal point of Skyfactor’s analysis, Recommendations for Improvement (based on a multi-variant linear
regression), is weakened if too many variables are used. Factors, a significantly shorter set of variables, strengthen the regressionanalysis.
Factor Analysis // Factor analysis is a statistical technique used to derive factors. The basic assumption of factor analysis is that underlyingdimensions, or factors, can be used to explain more complex phenomena. In measuring perceptions, the object is to combine several questionsthat, in concert, capture the notion for a particular topic, such as “Facilities”.
Factor Reliability // Once it has been determined that a set of scaled questions do share a relationship and therefore constitute a factor, there isan additional (and necessary) statistical test to assess the psychometric soundness of the factor. We rely on Cronbach’s Alpha to determine theinternal consistency or reliability of any factor. A Cronbach’s alpha of zero would mean that there is no internal consistency at all, i.e., subjectsare likely to respond with any value on any of the questions in a factor with no discernible pattern. An alpha of 1 would mean that every subjectanswered every question comprising the factor consistently. This is a highly unlikely event. An alpha of .5 is considered acceptable; an alpha of.7 good; alphas in the .8 to .9 range are exceptional.
Below is a list of this assessment’s factors and the corresponding Reliability (Chronbach’s Alpha).
FACTOR NAME QUESTION NUMBERS RELIABILITY
FACTOR 1 // Satisfaction // Quality of Nursing Instruction 32-35, 37-38 0.91
FACTOR 2 // Satisfaction // Work and Class Size 46-49 0.88
FACTOR 3 // Satisfaction // Course Lecture and Interaction 39-45 0.95
FACTOR 4 // Satisfaction // Facilities and Administration 56-62 0.88
FACTOR 5 // Satisfaction // Classmates 50-53 0.88
FACTOR 6 // Satisfaction // Advisor 63-65 0.93
FACTOR 7 // Learning // Professional Values 79-80, 82-84 0.94
FACTOR 8 // Learning // Core Competencies 69, 71, 81, 91 0.88
FACTOR 9 // Learning // Technical Skills 87-90 0.90
FACTOR 10 // Learning // Core Knowledge 68, 72-78, 86, 92 0.95
FACTOR 11 // Learning // Role Development 66-67, 70, 85 0.82
FACTOR 12 // Satisfaction // Overall Satisfaction 100-101 0.94
FACTOR 13 // Learning // Overall Learning 102-104 0.88
FACTOR 14 // Overall // Overall Program Effectiveness 100-105 0.93
Non-Factor Questions 27-28, 36, 93, 95-98 n/a
FACTORS
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment Survey Summary // 9©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Skyfactor is dedicated to providing relevant statistical analysis which removes the guesswork from the reader. Making decisions on assessmentinformation without fully understanding if the results are statistical, could lead to decisions with unintended consequences. In this report, weprovide results from regression analysis and statistical testing of means.
Regression Analysis (Identifying Predictors) // A correlation establishes the relationship between two variables. Regression analysis, bycontrast, allows us to determine the relationship between an assment’s dependent factor (in this assessment, Overall Program Effectiveness) andmultiple independent factors (e.g., facilities, environment, etc.). If we suspect, for example, that Overall Program Effectiveness is related to a setof independent factors, we could simultaneously assess the extent to which all of these independent factors predict Overall ProgramEffectiveness. Beyond that, we can determine the exact weights for each of the independent factors, which allows us to identify which of theindependent factors is most important, which is second, and so forth. We can further determine how much each independent factor increasesour ability to predict Overall Program Effectiveness.
The first step in regression analysis is to identify which of the independent factors is the best predictor of Overall Program Effectiveness. Next,the analysis takes into account (controls for) the effect of the first predictor and then determines the second best predictor. This is an iterativeprocess, which controls for all prior factors, then identifies the next predictor (e.g., the 3rd most important, 4th most important and so on).
Examining the output of this process allows us to identify the most important predictors among the dependent factors, those with more modestexplanatory power, and finally those factors that contribute nothing to our understanding of the Overall Program Effectiveness.
We should note that while the factors in this latter category have no explanatory power, in a practical sense, they contribute greatly to ourdecision-making ability. Knowing what is not related to -- or predictive of -- Overall Program Effectiveness can be a valuable insight. Presumably,one would not allocate scarce resources to improve elements that are not related to Overall Program Effectiveness. Conversely, if we know thebest predictors of Overall Program Effectiveness, investment in those elements would pay high dividends.
In reporting results of regression analysis, we discuss the “contribution to the variance”. Essentially, this refers to how well we can explain acertain outcome (improving Overall Program Effectiveness) by using the factors. The higher the contribution, the stronger our conclusions abouthow well the factors we have identified help us understand what predicts a given outcome (in this case, improving Overall ProgramEffectiveness).
Statistical Testing of Means (T-Test) // The t-test determines whether the means of two data sets are statistically different from each other.The result of the t-test is a p-value that indicates how likely those results could happen by chance. A difference is identified as “significant” if theprobability that the result could have occurred merely due to chance is less than 5%. All differences reported are significant at the p < 0.05levels or better. Many are significant at the p < 0.01 (less than 1% of the results could have occurred due to chance) or p < 0.001 (less than0.1% of the results could have occurred due to chance) level.
Statistical testing is conducted between your institution’s results and the aggregate of your external benchmarking institutions (Select 6institutions, Carnegie Class institutions, and all participating institutions). We also conduct statistical testing between populations and betweensubsequent years. In this report, we indicate if the test was statistical to p < 0.05 but do not provide individual p-values; p-values can be foundin Skyfactor Benchworks’ Online Reporting.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment Survey Summary // 10©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Benchmarking is the process of comparing your institution's performance against other institutions. National benchmarking assessments allowstandards to be set and, through those standards, your institution can calibrate its effectiveness. Throughout this report (and Skyfactor's OnlineReporting), you will find comparisons of your institution's results against those of your external benchmarking institutions (Select 6 institutions,Carnegie Class institutions, and all participating institutions). As you review these results, note the areas where your institution’s outperformsyour external benchmarks; these are areas to celebrate! The opposite may also be true; you may find areas where your institution underperformsyour external benchmarks. This indicates that others may have a better approach or better implementation and improvement is possible.
Select 6 Institutions // A very important aspect of this benchmarking assessment is the comparison of your institution's results against four tosix peer or aspirant institutions (regardless of the number of institutions selected, Skyfactor refers to this group as "Select 6"). In this report, weprovide the aggregated information from these institutions. If you want to view an individual Select 6 institutional performance, please accessSkyfactor Benchworks' Online Reports; however to protect anonymity, institutional names are not linked to results. Your Select 6 institutions are:
NOTE: Your institution was allowed to choose from institutions who participated in 2013, 2014 or 2015; the data collection year is noted besidethe institutions name.
YOUR SELECT 6 INSTITUTIONS
Ashland University (2015) Cedarville University (2015)
Lourdes University (2015) Northern Michigan University (2015)
University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire (2015) Urbana University (2015)
Carnegie Classification Institutions // The institutions in your Carnegie Class compose the second external benchmarking group. The CarnegieClassification of Institutions of Higher Education is a framework for classifying, or grouping, colleges and universities in the United States. Theprimary purpose of the framework is for educational research and analysis, where it is often important to identify groups of roughly comparableinstitutions. The classification includes all accredited, degree-granting colleges and universities in the United States that are represented in theNational Center for Education Statistics Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS). For this assessment, Skyfactor used the 2010Basic Carnegie Classifications to determine your institution’s classification. All institutions outside the United States are combined into an“International” Carnegie Class. For a complete list of the institutions in your Carnegie Class, please refer to Skyfactor Benchworks' OnlineReports.
YOUR CARNEGIE CLASSIFICATION
Baccalaureate Colleges--Diverse Fields
Includes institutions where baccalaureate degrees represent at least 10 percent of all undergraduate degrees and where fewer than 50master's degrees or 20 doctoral degrees were awarded during the update year. (Some institutions above the master's degree threshold arealso included) Excludes Special Focus Institutions and Tribal Colleges.
There are 24 institutions in this comparative group.
All Institutions // The third external benchmark is the combination of all participating institutions. This provides a national norm or nationalstandard. For a complete list of all participating institutions, please access Skyfactor Benchworks' Online Reports.
There are 273 institutions in this comparative group.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Survey Summary // 11©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Survey response rate (also known as completion rate or return rate) refers to the percentage of the surveyed population who responded to thesurvey. It is calculated by dividing the number of survey participants by the number of people in the sample. For example: if 1,000 surveys wereattempted and 257 were completed, then the response rate would be 25.7%. Below are the response rates for your institution and your externalbenchmarking institutions. We have also included response rates by a few key categorical/demographic questions. Response rates for all othercategorical/demographic questions can be found in Skyfactor Benchworks' Online Reports.
SURVEY RESPONSE RATE PERFORMANCE
# ATTEMPTED # RESPRESPONSE
RATE
Your Institution 98 60 61.2%
Select 6 547 445 81.4%
Carnegie Class 1,256 905 72.1%
All Institutions 52,933 27,870 52.7%
0 ------ RESPONSE RATE ------ 100%
WHAT IS YOUR GENDER?
# RESP % TOTAL
Female 52 86.7%
Male 8 13.3%
Transgender 0 0%
Other 0 0%
0 ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 100%
RACE/ETHNICITY (REPORTING ONLY)
# RESP % TOTAL
White 57 95%
Hispanic (regardless of race) 1 1.7%
American Indian/Alaska Native/First Nation 1 1.7%
Black or African American 1 1.7%
Asian 0 0%
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander 0 0%
Two or more races 0 0%
Race and ethnicity unknown 0 0%
0 ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 100%
SURVEY RESPONSE RATES
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Survey Summary // 12©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
HOW MANY YEARS OF FULL-TIME HEALTH RELATED WORK EXPERIENCE DID YOU HAVE PRIOR TO ENTERING THIS PROGRAM?
# RESP % TOTAL
No health related work experience 29 48.3%
More than 5 years 12 20%
1 to up to 3 years 11 18.3%
Less than 1 year1 4 6.7%
3 to 5 years 4 6.7%
0 ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 100%
WHAT IS YOUR CUMULATIVE GPA?
# RESP % TOTAL
3.50 or above 31 52.5%
3.00-3.49 22 37.3%
2.50-2.99 4 6.8%
2.00-2.49 2 3.4%
Below 2.00 0 0%
Don't know 0 0%
0 ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 100%
WHAT WAS YOUR SAT MATH+VERBAL OR ACT COMPOSITE SCORE? (HIGHEST SCORE IF YOU TOOK MULTIPLE TESTS)
# RESP % TOTAL
Didn't take or don't remember 35 59.3%
SAT 1081-1240/ACT 24-27 9 15.3%
SAT 1241/ACT 28 or above 7 11.9%
SAT 931-1080/ACT 20-23 5 8.5%
SAT 930/ACT 19 or below 3 5.1%
0 ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 100%
SURVEY RESPONSE RATES
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Survey Summary // 13©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
This assessment allows for a high degree of customization to suit your institutional needs.
Unit-Levels // Your institution had the option of coding their surveys by Unit-Level, which provides analysis at this level of detail. From thisanalysis, you can immediately identify the areas that are top performing and those that are lower performing which drives the development ofinternal “best practices”. This analysis can be found within each factor section later in this report. A more detailed analysis can be found inSkyfactor Benchworks’ Online Reports.
Degree Program 3 coded
Institution Specific Questions (ISQs) // Many institutions choose to take advantage of the opportunity to add “institution specific” questions tothe survey. If your institution added questions, a detailed analysis of those questions can be found in Skyfactor Benchworks’ Online Reports.
ASSESSMENT CUSTOMIZATION
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Survey Summary // 14©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
To help your institution better understand its current performance and potential areas of improvement, Skyfactor reports results by MajorIndicators of Performance (current performance of these indicators is listed below). This allows you to examine each indicator separately toidentify areas in need of improvement. Subsequent reports in the Executive Summary provide detailed information for each indicator includingrecommendations for improvement, external benchmarking, and longitudinal trends. From the analysis, you may identify one or more factors inneed of improvement. For more detailed information on that factor(s), please reference the appropriate section (tabs are labeled by factornumbers). In addition, please reference Skyfactor Benchworks' Online Reports which provides more detailed reporting.
Satisfaction // This indicator is a collection of factors that measures satisfaction on areas such as services, programming, or facilities. Thedependent variable, within this indicator, is Overall Satisfaction. It acts as a proxy for the indicator and is composed of questions such as “Towhat degree did your on-campus housing experience fulfill your expectations?” It is important to understand the factors that drive satisfactionbecause a positive living environment can improve student learning.
INDICATOR PERFORMANCE
SELECT 6CARNEGIE
CLASSALL
INST. N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 12 // Overall Satisfaction 57 4.87 1.62 64.5%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Learning // This indicator is a collection of factors (e.g., Peer Interactions and Personal Growth) that measures student learning outcomesresulting from the residence hall experience. The dependent variable, within this indicator, is Overall Learning. It acts as a proxy for the indicatorand is composed of questions such as “To what degree has living in on-campus housing enhanced your learning experience?” It is important tounderstand the degree to which the residence hall experience impacts overall learning in order to improve the college experience. In addition, byimproving the factors that drive learning, student learning improves.
INDICATOR PERFORMANCE
SELECT 6CARNEGIE
CLASSALL
INST. N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 13 // Overall Learning 57 5.77 1.12 79.5%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Overall // This indicator, a combination of Satisfaction and Learning, provides a measure of the overall experience of the resident. The dependentvariable, Overall Program Effectiveness, acts as the proxy for the indicator and is composed of questions from the dependent variables inSatisfaction and Learning. Ultimately, the residence hall experience is a balance between customer satisfaction and student learning, thusunderstanding the predictors of Overall Program Effectiveness allows allocation of resources to the area(s) that will most benefit the resident.
INDICATOR PERFORMANCE
SELECT 6CARNEGIE
CLASSALL
INST. N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 14 // Overall Program Effectiveness 57 5.37 1.19 72.8%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
MAJOR INDICATORS OF PERFORMANCE
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East 1©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
SUMMARY CURRENT PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING RECOMMENDATIONS LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
In this series of reports, you will find a summary of the indicator, Satisfaction. This summary includes current performance, externalbenchmarking, recommendations for improvement, and longitudinal trends. Together these analyses create a picture of your institution'sperformance and provide guidance for future improvement efforts. If you need to better understand the behavior of a factor, please reference itssection (tabs are labeled by factor numbers). Also, please reference Skyfactor Benchworks' Online Reports for additional reporting.
Summary // The analyses below allow you to monitor the overall performance of the indicator, Satisfaction. Included are the currentperformance of the indicator’s dependent variable, Overall Satisfaction, your institutional strength and weakness (the highest and lowestperformance factor within this indicator), peer comparison (the factors where your institution performs best and worst against your Select 6), andthe longitudinal trend of Overall Satisfaction. In subsequent indicator reports, we provide in-depth information in each of these areas.
INDICATOR PERFORMANCE
SELECT 6CARNEGIE
CLASSALL
INST. N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 12 // Overall Satisfaction 57 4.87 1.62 64.5%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES // YOUR INSTITUTION
SELECT 6CARNEGIE
CLASSALL
INST. N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 6 // Advisor 59 5.64 1.40 77.3%
Factor 4 // Facilities and Administration 59 4.44 1.19 57.3%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES // COMPARISON WITH SELECT 6
SELECT 6CARNEGIE
CLASSALL
INST. N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 4 // Facilities and Administration 59 4.44 1.19 57.3%
Factor 5 // Classmates 59 5.20 1.20 70.0%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
LONGITUDINAL TREND // OVERALL SATISFACTION
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 75.0% 68.4% 76.8% 47.5% 64.5%
Mean 5.50 5.11 5.61 3.85 4.87
INDICATOR // SATISFACTION
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Executive Summary // 2©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
SUMMARY CURRENT PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING RECOMMENDATIONS LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
There are many pieces of analysis that, when combined, create a comprehensive picture of your institution’s performance. The first analysis toexamine is the current performance. This information, coupled with understanding of individual population perceptions, external benchmarks,longitudinal trends, recommendations for improvement, and other institutional information or assessment is invaluable to constructing aneffective Action Plan for improvement.
Current Performance // AggregateBelow is your institution's current performance for Overall Satisfaction. This factor would be difficult to improve directly, but improving itspredictors should result in its improvement. Be sure to review the Recommendations section, within the indicatior, before creating yourimprovement plan.
INDICATOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 12 // Overall Satisfaction 57 4.87 1.62 64.5%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Below is the current performance of the factors associated with the Satisfaction indicator. Please review all of the information in this sectionbefore creating your program’s Action Plan to improve Overall Satisfaction. It is natural to want to improve the lowest performing factors, but becareful! Improving the lowest performing factor may not improve Overall Satisfaction if it is not a predictor. Finish reviewing all analysis beforedeveloping your improvement plan.
INDICATOR FACTORS BY PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 6 // Advisor 59 5.64 1.40 77.3%
Factor 3 // Course Lecture and Interaction 59 5.56 1.01 76.0%
Factor 5 // Classmates 59 5.20 1.20 70.0%
Factor 2 // Work and Class Size 59 5.08 1.08 68.0%
Factor 1 // Quality of Nursing Instruction 59 4.87 1.15 64.5%
Factor 4 // Facilities and Administration 59 4.44 1.19 57.3%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
INDICATOR // SATISFACTION
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Executive Summary // 3©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
SUMMARY CURRENT PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING RECOMMENDATIONS LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Current Performance // Key PopulationsSkyfactor continues to analyze the current performance of Overall Satisfaction by investigating how key subpopulations rate your institution’sperformance. Key categorical questions have been selected and are reported on below. Answer options within each categorical question havebeen divided into two groups in order to facilitate a statistical testing of means; a designates the population which is statistically higher thanthe other population, a designates the population that is statistically lower and an indicates that the populations have statistically equalfactor means. Relative population size (% Total) and Performance values for each group are plotted. Analysis for other subpopulations can befound in Skyfactor’s Online Reporting.
WHAT IS YOUR GENDER?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
Female 50 4.92 1.68 65.3%
52 86.7% Male 7 4.50 1.07 58.3%
8 13.3% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
RACE/ETHNICITY (REPORTING ONLY)
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
White 55 4.84 1.63 64.0%
57 95% All others N/A 2 NR NR NR NR
3 5% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
HOW MANY YEARS OF FULL-TIME HEALTH RELATED WORK EXPERIENCE DID YOU HAVE PRIOR TO ENTERING THIS PROGRAM?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
One or more years of work experience 25 5.26 1.40 71.0%
27 45% Less than one year of work experience 32 4.56 1.71 59.3%
33 55% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
WHAT IS YOUR CUMULATIVE GPA?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
3.00 GPA and higher 50 4.99 1.49 66.5%
53 89.8% Below 3.00 GPA 6 3.58 2.03 43.0%
6 10.2% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
INDICATOR // SATISFACTION
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Executive Summary // 4©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
WHAT WAS YOUR SAT MATH+VERBAL OR ACT COMPOSITE SCORE? (HIGHEST SCORE IF YOU TOOK MULTIPLE TESTS)
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
SAT 1240 / ACT 27 and below 17 4.68 1.64 61.3%
17 70.8% SAT 1241 / ACT 28 and higher 6 4.50 1.32 58.3%
7 29.2% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
INDICATOR // SATISFACTION
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Executive Summary // 5©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
SUMMARY CURRENT PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING RECOMMENDATIONS LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
The second piece of the analysis picture is External Benchmarking. Throughout this report and in Skyfactor’s Online Reporting, Benchworkscompares your institutional data to the aggregate of your external benchmarking groups. If your Action Plan for institutional improvementincludes improving Overall Satisfaction and if your program is performing below any of these external benchmarking groups, this information canbe used to convince staff that higher performance is possible. If your institutional performance is higher than any of these groups, use this tocelebrate!
Below is a comparison of your institutional results to your Select 6, Carnegie Class, and all participating institutions for the indicator’s dependentvariable, Overall Satisfaction, and the other factors associated with this indicator. A designates factors where your institution performsstatistically higher than that external benchmarking group; a designates factors where your program is statistically lower in performance; anda represents factors that are statistically equal with that external benchmarking group. The chart represents your institution’s performance oneach factor.
INDICATOR PERFORMANCE
SELECT 6CARNEGIE
CLASSALL
INST. N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 12 // Overall Satisfaction 57 4.87 1.62 64.5%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
INDICATOR FACTORS BY PERFORMANCE
SELECT 6CARNEGIE
CLASSALL
INST. N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 6 // Advisor 59 5.64 1.40 77.3%
Factor 3 // Course Lecture and Interaction 59 5.56 1.01 76.0%
Factor 5 // Classmates 59 5.20 1.20 70.0%
Factor 2 // Work and Class Size 59 5.08 1.08 68.0%
Factor 1 // Quality of Nursing Instruction 59 4.87 1.15 64.5%
Factor 4 // Facilities and Administration 59 4.44 1.19 57.3%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
INDICATOR // SATISFACTION
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Executive Summary // 6©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
SUMMARY CURRENT PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING RECOMMENDATIONS LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Arguably the most important piece of the analysis is Recommendations for Improvement In order to improve Overall Satisfaction, it is necessaryto know which factors have the greatest impact. Improving factors with high impact should lead to an improvement in Overall Satisfaction. Thefirst chart shown below is the current performance for Overall Satisfaction. If this performance is below your desired level, identify the highimpact factors (listed below) and focus your institution’s improvement efforts on those factors.
INDICATOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 12 // Overall Satisfaction 57 4.87 1.62 64.5%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Skyfactor has grouped the Overall Satisfaction predictors into high and low impact as calculated from a multi-variant linear regression analysis.The strongest predictor is labeled as “1st”, the second strongest is “2nd”, and so forth. We label factors that do not contribute to the variance as“NP” (non-predictor). Skyfactor recommends your program focus its resources to improve the performance of your high impact factors whilemaintaining, but not expending resources to improve, low/no impact factor performance.
HIGH IMPACT FACTORS
PREDICTOR CONTRIBUTION N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 1 // Quality of Nursing Instruction 1ST 36.4% 59 4.87 1.15 64.5%
Factor 4 // Facilities and Administration 2ND 26.2% 59 4.44 1.19 57.3%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
LOW/NO IMPACT FACTORS
PREDICTOR CONTRIBUTION N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 6 // Advisor NP 0% 59 5.64 1.40 77.3%
Factor 3 // Course Lecture and Interaction NP 0% 59 5.56 1.01 76.0%
Factor 5 // Classmates NP 0% 59 5.20 1.20 70.0%
Factor 2 // Work and Class Size NP 0% 59 5.08 1.08 68.0%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
INDICATOR // SATISFACTION
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Executive Summary // 7©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
SUMMARY CURRENT PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING RECOMMENDATIONS LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
The final piece of the analysis is Longitudinal Trends which supports continuous improvement. The term “continuous improvement” means anever-ending effort to improve programs and processes through several incremental improvements rather than one overwhelming innovation.The term “continuous assessment” means conducting assessment at regular intervals (Skyfactor recommends annual assessment); continuousassessment informs continuous improvement.
Longitudinal trends analysis, an artifact of continuous assessment, is the key to evaluating your institution’s continuous improvement efforts.Understanding trends is necessary to determine whether the actions conducted resulted in a successful outcome. If your institution’s currentperformance falls short of expectations, review the actions conducted on the top predictors and make adjustments.
Below is the longitudinal trend for the indicator and top predictors for the most recent iterations of this assessment. If your institution did notparticipate continuously during these iterations, Skyfactor extrapolated between successive iterations. A designates years where yourinstitution performs statistically higher than the current year; a designates years where your program is statistically lower in performance; anda represents years that are statistically equal to the current year.
LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
OVERALL INDICATOR PERFORMANCE 1ST PREDICTOR 2ND PREDICTORFactor 12 // Overall Satisfaction Factor 1 // Quality of Nursing Instruction Factor 4 // Facilities and Administration
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 75.0% 68.4% 76.8% 47.5% 64.5%
Mean 5.50 5.11 5.61 3.85 4.87
Performance 71.9% 68.5% 68.4% 54.4% 64.6%
Mean 5.31 5.11 5.11 4.27 4.87
Performance 69.0% 68.1% 67.0% 55.2% 57.4%
Mean 5.14 5.09 5.02 4.31 4.44
INDICATOR // SATISFACTION
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Executive Summary // 8©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
SUMMARY CURRENT PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING RECOMMENDATIONS LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
In this series of reports, you will find a summary of the indicator, Learning. This summary includes current performance, external benchmarking,recommendations for improvement, and longitudinal trends. Together these analyses create a picture of your institution's performance andprovide guidance for future improvement efforts. If you need to better understand the behavior of a factor, please reference its section (tabs arelabeled by factor numbers). Also, please reference Skyfactor Benchworks' Online Reports for additional reporting.
Summary // The analyses below allow you to monitor the overall performance of the indicator, Learning. Included are the current performance ofthe indicator’s dependent variable, Overall Learning, your institutional strength and weakness (the highest and lowest performance factor withinthis indicator), peer comparison (the factors where your institution performs best and worst against your Select 6), and the longitudinal trend ofOverall Learning. In subsequent indicator reports, we provide in-depth information in each of these areas.
INDICATOR PERFORMANCE
SELECT 6CARNEGIE
CLASSALL
INST. N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 13 // Overall Learning 57 5.77 1.12 79.5%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES // YOUR INSTITUTION
SELECT 6CARNEGIE
CLASSALL
INST. N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 7 // Professional Values 57 5.88 0.96 81.3%
Factor 11 // Role Development 58 5.00 1.05 66.7%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES // COMPARISON WITH SELECT 6
SELECT 6CARNEGIE
CLASSALL
INST. N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 9 // Technical Skills 56 5.45 1.18 74.2%
Factor 11 // Role Development 58 5.00 1.05 66.7%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
LONGITUDINAL TREND // OVERALL LEARNING
70%
80%
90%
2013 2014 2015
Performance 85.6% 74.1% 79.4%
Mean 6.14 5.44 5.77
INDICATOR // LEARNING
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Executive Summary // 9©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
SUMMARY CURRENT PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING RECOMMENDATIONS LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
There are many pieces of analysis that, when combined, create a comprehensive picture of your institution’s performance. The first analysis toexamine is the current performance. This information, coupled with understanding of individual population perceptions, external benchmarks,longitudinal trends, recommendations for improvement, and other institutional information or assessment is invaluable to constructing aneffective Action Plan for improvement.
Current Performance // AggregateBelow is your institution's current performance for Overall Learning. This factor would be difficult to improve directly, but improving its predictorsshould result in its improvement. Be sure to review the Recommendations section, within the indicatior, before creating your improvement plan.
INDICATOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 13 // Overall Learning 57 5.77 1.12 79.5%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Below is the current performance of the factors associated with the Learning indicator. Please review all of the information in this section beforecreating your program’s Action Plan to improve Overall Learning. It is natural to want to improve the lowest performing factors, but be careful!Improving the lowest performing factor may not improve Overall Learning if it is not a predictor. Finish reviewing all analysis before developingyour improvement plan.
INDICATOR FACTORS BY PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 7 // Professional Values 57 5.88 0.96 81.3%
Factor 8 // Core Competencies 58 5.47 1.10 74.5%
Factor 9 // Technical Skills 56 5.45 1.18 74.2%
Factor 10 // Core Knowledge 58 5.45 0.99 74.2%
Factor 11 // Role Development 58 5.00 1.05 66.7%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
INDICATOR // LEARNING
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Executive Summary // 10©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
SUMMARY CURRENT PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING RECOMMENDATIONS LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Current Performance // Key PopulationsSkyfactor continues to analyze the current performance of Overall Learning by investigating how key subpopulations rate your institution’sperformance. Key categorical questions have been selected and are reported on below. Answer options within each categorical question havebeen divided into two groups in order to facilitate a statistical testing of means; a designates the population which is statistically higher thanthe other population, a designates the population that is statistically lower and an indicates that the populations have statistically equalfactor means. Relative population size (% Total) and Performance values for each group are plotted. Analysis for other subpopulations can befound in Skyfactor’s Online Reporting.
WHAT IS YOUR GENDER?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
Female 50 5.82 1.13 80.3%
52 86.7% Male 7 5.38 0.93 73.0%
8 13.3% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
RACE/ETHNICITY (REPORTING ONLY)
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
White 55 5.72 1.11 78.7%
57 95% All others N/A 2 NR NR NR NR
3 5% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
HOW MANY YEARS OF FULL-TIME HEALTH RELATED WORK EXPERIENCE DID YOU HAVE PRIOR TO ENTERING THIS PROGRAM?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
One or more years of work experience 25 5.99 0.95 83.2%
27 45% Less than one year of work experience 32 5.59 1.20 76.5%
33 55% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
WHAT IS YOUR CUMULATIVE GPA?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
3.00 GPA and higher 50 5.81 1.11 80.2%
53 89.8% Below 3.00 GPA 6 5.17 0.98 69.5%
6 10.2% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
INDICATOR // LEARNING
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Executive Summary // 11©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
WHAT WAS YOUR SAT MATH+VERBAL OR ACT COMPOSITE SCORE? (HIGHEST SCORE IF YOU TOOK MULTIPLE TESTS)
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
SAT 1240 / ACT 27 and below 17 5.43 1.14 73.8%
17 70.8% SAT 1241 / ACT 28 and higher 6 5.33 1.11 72.2%
7 29.2% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
INDICATOR // LEARNING
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Executive Summary // 12©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
SUMMARY CURRENT PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING RECOMMENDATIONS LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
The second piece of the analysis picture is External Benchmarking. Throughout this report and in Skyfactor’s Online Reporting, Benchworkscompares your institutional data to the aggregate of your external benchmarking groups. If your Action Plan for institutional improvementincludes improving Overall Learning and if your program is performing below any of these external benchmarking groups, this information can beused to convince staff that higher performance is possible. If your institutional performance is higher than any of these groups, use this tocelebrate!
Below is a comparison of your institutional results to your Select 6, Carnegie Class, and all participating institutions for the indicator’s dependentvariable, Overall Learning, and the other factors associated with this indicator. A designates factors where your institution performsstatistically higher than that external benchmarking group; a designates factors where your program is statistically lower in performance; anda represents factors that are statistically equal with that external benchmarking group. The chart represents your institution’s performance oneach factor.
INDICATOR PERFORMANCE
SELECT 6CARNEGIE
CLASSALL
INST. N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 13 // Overall Learning 57 5.77 1.12 79.5%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
INDICATOR FACTORS BY PERFORMANCE
SELECT 6CARNEGIE
CLASSALL
INST. N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 7 // Professional Values 57 5.88 0.96 81.3%
Factor 8 // Core Competencies 58 5.47 1.10 74.5%
Factor 9 // Technical Skills 56 5.45 1.18 74.2%
Factor 10 // Core Knowledge 58 5.45 0.99 74.2%
Factor 11 // Role Development 58 5.00 1.05 66.7%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
INDICATOR // LEARNING
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Executive Summary // 13©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
SUMMARY CURRENT PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING RECOMMENDATIONS LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Arguably the most important piece of the analysis is Recommendations for Improvement In order to improve Overall Learning, it is necessary toknow which factors have the greatest impact. Improving factors with high impact should lead to an improvement in Overall Learning. The firstchart shown below is the current performance for Overall Learning. If this performance is below your desired level, identify the high impactfactors (listed below) and focus your institution’s improvement efforts on those factors.
INDICATOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 13 // Overall Learning 57 5.77 1.12 79.5%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Skyfactor has grouped the Overall Learning predictors into high and low impact as calculated from a multi-variant linear regression analysis. Thestrongest predictor is labeled as “1st”, the second strongest is “2nd”, and so forth. We label factors that do not contribute to the variance as“NP” (non-predictor). Skyfactor recommends your program focus its resources to improve the performance of your high impact factors whilemaintaining, but not expending resources to improve, low/no impact factor performance.
Note: Skyfactory Benchworks uses a significance value of p < .05 to calculate predictors. Based on the number of responses and/orthe behavior of those responses, the significance value has been increased to p < 0.11
HIGH IMPACT FACTORS
PREDICTOR CONTRIBUTION N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 8 // Core Competencies 1ST 21.3% 58 5.47 1.10 74.5%
Factor 10 // Core Knowledge 2ND 20.3% 58 5.45 0.99 74.2%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
LOW/NO IMPACT FACTORS
PREDICTOR CONTRIBUTION N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 7 // Professional Values NP 0% 57 5.88 0.96 81.3%
Factor 9 // Technical Skills NP 0% 56 5.45 1.18 74.2%
Factor 11 // Role Development NP 0% 58 5.00 1.05 66.7%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
INDICATOR // LEARNING
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Executive Summary // 14©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
SUMMARY CURRENT PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING RECOMMENDATIONS LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
The final piece of the analysis is Longitudinal Trends which supports continuous improvement. The term “continuous improvement” means anever-ending effort to improve programs and processes through several incremental improvements rather than one overwhelming innovation.The term “continuous assessment” means conducting assessment at regular intervals (Skyfactor recommends annual assessment); continuousassessment informs continuous improvement.
Longitudinal trends analysis, an artifact of continuous assessment, is the key to evaluating your institution’s continuous improvement efforts.Understanding trends is necessary to determine whether the actions conducted resulted in a successful outcome. If your institution’s currentperformance falls short of expectations, review the actions conducted on the top predictors and make adjustments.
Below is the longitudinal trend for the indicator and top predictors for the most recent iterations of this assessment. If your institution did notparticipate continuously during these iterations, Skyfactor extrapolated between successive iterations. A designates years where yourinstitution performs statistically higher than the current year; a designates years where your program is statistically lower in performance; anda represents years that are statistically equal to the current year.
LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
OVERALL INDICATOR PERFORMANCE 1ST PREDICTOR 2ND PREDICTORFactor 13 // Overall Learning Factor 8 // Core Competencies Factor 10 // Core Knowledge
70%
80%
90%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance -- -- 85.6% 74.1% 79.4%
Mean -- -- 6.14 5.44 5.77
Performance 79.1% 80.3% 80.4% 74.0% 74.5%
Mean 5.74 5.82 5.82 5.44 5.47
Performance 76.1% 77.6% 79.9% 72.5% 74.1%
Mean 5.56 5.66 5.80 5.35 5.45
INDICATOR // LEARNING
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Executive Summary // 15©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
SUMMARY CURRENT PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING RECOMMENDATIONS LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
In this series of reports, you will find a summary of the indicator, Overall. This summary includes current performance, external benchmarking,recommendations for improvement, and longitudinal trends. Together these analyses create a picture of your institution's performance andprovide guidance for future improvement efforts. If you need to better understand the behavior of a factor, please reference its section (tabs arelabeled by factor numbers). Also, please reference Skyfactor Benchworks' Online Reports for additional reporting.
Summary // The analyses below allow you to monitor the overall performance of the indicator, Overall. Included are the current performance ofthe indicator’s dependent variable, Overall Program Effectiveness, your institutional strength and weakness (the highest and lowest performancefactor within this indicator), peer comparison (the factors where your institution performs best and worst against your Select 6), and thelongitudinal trend of Overall Program Effectiveness. In subsequent indicator reports, we provide in-depth information in each of these areas.
INDICATOR PERFORMANCE
SELECT 6CARNEGIE
CLASSALL
INST. N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 14 // Overall Program Effectiveness 57 5.37 1.19 72.8%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES // YOUR INSTITUTION
SELECT 6CARNEGIE
CLASSALL
INST. N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 7 // Professional Values 57 5.88 0.96 81.3%
Factor 4 // Facilities and Administration 59 4.44 1.19 57.3%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES // COMPARISON WITH SELECT 6
SELECT 6CARNEGIE
CLASSALL
INST. N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 9 // Technical Skills 56 5.45 1.18 74.2%
Factor 11 // Role Development 58 5.00 1.05 66.7%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
LONGITUDINAL TREND // OVERALL PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS
60%
70%
80%
90%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 70.5% 68.0% 81.1% 62.3% 72.9%
Mean 5.23 5.08 5.86 4.74 5.37
INDICATOR // OVERALL
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Executive Summary // 16©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
SUMMARY CURRENT PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING RECOMMENDATIONS LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
There are many pieces of analysis that, when combined, create a comprehensive picture of your institution’s performance. The first analysis toexamine is the current performance. This information, coupled with understanding of individual population perceptions, external benchmarks,longitudinal trends, recommendations for improvement, and other institutional information or assessment is invaluable to constructing aneffective Action Plan for improvement.
Current Performance // AggregateBelow is your institution's current performance for Overall Program Effectiveness. This factor would be difficult to improve directly, but improvingits predictors should result in its improvement. Be sure to review the Recommendations section, within the indicatior, before creating yourimprovement plan.
INDICATOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 14 // Overall Program Effectiveness 57 5.37 1.19 72.8%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Below is the current performance of the factors associated with the Overall indicator. Please review all of the information in this section beforecreating your program’s Action Plan to improve Overall Program Effectiveness. It is natural to want to improve the lowest performing factors, butbe careful! Improving the lowest performing factor may not improve Overall Program Effectiveness if it is not a predictor. Finish reviewing allanalysis before developing your improvement plan.
INDICATOR FACTORS BY PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 7 // Professional Values 57 5.88 0.96 81.3%
Factor 6 // Advisor 59 5.64 1.40 77.3%
Factor 3 // Course Lecture and Interaction 59 5.56 1.01 76.0%
Factor 8 // Core Competencies 58 5.47 1.10 74.5%
Factor 9 // Technical Skills 56 5.45 1.18 74.2%
Factor 10 // Core Knowledge 58 5.45 0.99 74.2%
Factor 5 // Classmates 59 5.20 1.20 70.0%
Factor 2 // Work and Class Size 59 5.08 1.08 68.0%
Factor 11 // Role Development 58 5.00 1.05 66.7%
Factor 1 // Quality of Nursing Instruction 59 4.87 1.15 64.5%
Factor 4 // Facilities and Administration 59 4.44 1.19 57.3%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
INDICATOR // OVERALL
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Executive Summary // 17©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
SUMMARY CURRENT PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING RECOMMENDATIONS LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Current Performance // Key PopulationsSkyfactor continues to analyze the current performance of Overall Program Effectiveness by investigating how key subpopulations rate yourinstitution’s performance. Key categorical questions have been selected and are reported on below. Answer options within each categoricalquestion have been divided into two groups in order to facilitate a statistical testing of means; a designates the population which isstatistically higher than the other population, a designates the population that is statistically lower and an indicates that the populationshave statistically equal factor means. Relative population size (% Total) and Performance values for each group are plotted. Analysis for othersubpopulations can be found in Skyfactor’s Online Reporting.
WHAT IS YOUR GENDER?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
Female 50 5.43 1.21 73.8%
52 86.7% Male 7 4.98 0.87 66.3%
8 13.3% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
RACE/ETHNICITY (REPORTING ONLY)
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
White 55 5.33 1.19 72.2%
57 95% All others N/A 2 NR NR NR NR
3 5% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
HOW MANY YEARS OF FULL-TIME HEALTH RELATED WORK EXPERIENCE DID YOU HAVE PRIOR TO ENTERING THIS PROGRAM?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
One or more years of work experience 25 5.61 0.96 76.8%
27 45% Less than one year of work experience 32 5.18 1.31 69.7%
33 55% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
WHAT IS YOUR CUMULATIVE GPA?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
3.00 GPA and higher 50 5.44 1.14 74.0%
53 89.8% Below 3.00 GPA 6 4.61 1.30 60.2%
6 10.2% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
INDICATOR // OVERALL
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Executive Summary // 18©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
WHAT WAS YOUR SAT MATH+VERBAL OR ACT COMPOSITE SCORE? (HIGHEST SCORE IF YOU TOOK MULTIPLE TESTS)
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
SAT 1240 / ACT 27 and below 17 5.07 1.21 67.8%
17 70.8% SAT 1241 / ACT 28 and higher 6 4.97 1.09 66.2%
7 29.2% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
INDICATOR // OVERALL
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Executive Summary // 19©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
SUMMARY CURRENT PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING RECOMMENDATIONS LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
The second piece of the analysis picture is External Benchmarking. Throughout this report and in Skyfactor’s Online Reporting, Benchworkscompares your institutional data to the aggregate of your external benchmarking groups. If your Action Plan for institutional improvementincludes improving Overall Program Effectiveness and if your program is performing below any of these external benchmarking groups, thisinformation can be used to convince staff that higher performance is possible. If your institutional performance is higher than any of thesegroups, use this to celebrate!
Below is a comparison of your institutional results to your Select 6, Carnegie Class, and all participating institutions for the indicator’s dependentvariable, Overall Program Effectiveness, and the other factors associated with this indicator. A designates factors where your institutionperforms statistically higher than that external benchmarking group; a designates factors where your program is statistically lower inperformance; and a represents factors that are statistically equal with that external benchmarking group. The chart represents yourinstitution’s performance on each factor.
INDICATOR PERFORMANCE
SELECT 6CARNEGIE
CLASSALL
INST. N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 14 // Overall Program Effectiveness 57 5.37 1.19 72.8%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
INDICATOR FACTORS BY PERFORMANCE
SELECT 6CARNEGIE
CLASSALL
INST. N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 7 // Professional Values 57 5.88 0.96 81.3%
Factor 6 // Advisor 59 5.64 1.40 77.3%
Factor 3 // Course Lecture and Interaction 59 5.56 1.01 76.0%
Factor 8 // Core Competencies 58 5.47 1.10 74.5%
Factor 9 // Technical Skills 56 5.45 1.18 74.2%
Factor 10 // Core Knowledge 58 5.45 0.99 74.2%
Factor 5 // Classmates 59 5.20 1.20 70.0%
Factor 2 // Work and Class Size 59 5.08 1.08 68.0%
Factor 11 // Role Development 58 5.00 1.05 66.7%
Factor 1 // Quality of Nursing Instruction 59 4.87 1.15 64.5%
Factor 4 // Facilities and Administration 59 4.44 1.19 57.3%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
INDICATOR // OVERALL
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Executive Summary // 20©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
SUMMARY CURRENT PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING RECOMMENDATIONS LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Arguably the most important piece of the analysis is Recommendations for Improvement In order to improve Overall Program Effectiveness, it isnecessary to know which factors have the greatest impact. Improving factors with high impact should lead to an improvement in Overall ProgramEffectiveness. The first chart shown below is the current performance for Overall Program Effectiveness. If this performance is below yourdesired level, identify the high impact factors (listed below) and focus your institution’s improvement efforts on those factors.
INDICATOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 14 // Overall Program Effectiveness 57 5.37 1.19 72.8%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Skyfactor has grouped the Overall Program Effectiveness predictors into high and low impact as calculated from a multi-variant linear regressionanalysis. The strongest predictor is labeled as “1st”, the second strongest is “2nd”, and so forth. We label factors that do not contribute to thevariance as “NP” (non-predictor). Skyfactor recommends your program focus its resources to improve the performance of your high impactfactors while maintaining, but not expending resources to improve, low/no impact factor performance.
HIGH IMPACT FACTORS
PREDICTOR CONTRIBUTION N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 4 // Facilities and Administration 1ST 64.2% 59 4.44 1.19 57.3%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
LOW/NO IMPACT FACTORS
PREDICTOR CONTRIBUTION N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 7 // Professional Values NP 0% 57 5.88 0.96 81.3%
Factor 6 // Advisor NP 0% 59 5.64 1.40 77.3%
Factor 3 // Course Lecture and Interaction NP 0% 59 5.56 1.01 76.0%
Factor 8 // Core Competencies NP 0% 58 5.47 1.10 74.5%
Factor 9 // Technical Skills NP 0% 56 5.45 1.18 74.2%
Factor 10 // Core Knowledge NP 0% 58 5.45 0.99 74.2%
Factor 5 // Classmates NP 0% 59 5.20 1.20 70.0%
Factor 2 // Work and Class Size NP 0% 59 5.08 1.08 68.0%
Factor 11 // Role Development NP 0% 58 5.00 1.05 66.7%
Factor 1 // Quality of Nursing Instruction NP 0% 59 4.87 1.15 64.5%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
INDICATOR // OVERALL
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Executive Summary // 21©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
SUMMARY CURRENT PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING RECOMMENDATIONS LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
The final piece of the analysis is Longitudinal Trends which supports continuous improvement. The term “continuous improvement” means anever-ending effort to improve programs and processes through several incremental improvements rather than one overwhelming innovation.The term “continuous assessment” means conducting assessment at regular intervals (Skyfactor recommends annual assessment); continuousassessment informs continuous improvement.
Longitudinal trends analysis, an artifact of continuous assessment, is the key to evaluating your institution’s continuous improvement efforts.Understanding trends is necessary to determine whether the actions conducted resulted in a successful outcome. If your institution’s currentperformance falls short of expectations, review the actions conducted on the top predictors and make adjustments.
Below is the longitudinal trend for the indicator and top predictors for the most recent iterations of this assessment. If your institution did notparticipate continuously during these iterations, Skyfactor extrapolated between successive iterations. A designates years where yourinstitution performs statistically higher than the current year; a designates years where your program is statistically lower in performance; anda represents years that are statistically equal to the current year.
LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
OVERALL INDICATOR PERFORMANCE 1ST PREDICTORFactor 14 // Overall ProgramEffectiveness
Factor 4 // Facilities and Administration
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 70.5% 68.0% 81.1% 62.3% 72.9%
Mean 5.23 5.08 5.86 4.74 5.37
Performance 69.0% 68.1% 67.0% 55.2% 57.4%
Mean 5.14 5.09 5.02 4.31 4.44
INDICATOR // OVERALL
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Executive Summary // 22©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factors, a composite of scaled questions that explain a larger concept, are utilized in Skyfactor Benchworks’ reporting to reduce complexity andstrengthen the analysis. Skyfactor provides an in-depth analysis of the factor, Quality of Nursing Instruction, in this section of reports.
You are likely referencing this section to better understand this factor due to: 1) this factor is a high predictor; 2) this factor is performing below adesired level; 3) this factor is of special interest to your institution; or 4) this factor is an indicator. Through this analysis (i.e., currentperformance, external benchmark comparisons, and longitudinal trends), a thorough picture of the factor should emerge, however additionalinformation can be found in Skyfactor Benchworks’ Online Reports.
If improving this factor is a goal for your institution, actions should be targeted toward the factor’s scaled questions (see list below) which aremore tangible and more directly actionable. Analysis for these scaled questions is provided in this section allowing for sufficient understanding;additional information can be found in Skyfactor Benchworks’ Online Reports.
FACTOR COMPOSITION
Quality of Nursing Instruction // Rate the quality of the BSN program regarding:
Q032 // Teaching in your clinical courses
Q033 // Teaching in your classroom courses
Q034 // Feedback on assignments (other than grades) you received from instructors in your clinical courses
Q035 // Feedback on assignments (other than grades) you received from instructors in your classroom courses
Q037 // Accessibility of faculty outside class
Q038 // Faculty responsiveness to student concerns
FACTOR 1 // Satisfaction: Quality of Nursing Instruction
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 1 // 1©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
There are many pieces of analysis that, when combined, create a comprehensive picture of your institution’s performance for this factor. The firstanalysis to examine is the current performance of the factor. This information, coupled with understanding of individual population perceptions,external benchmarks, longitudinal trends, individual scaled question performance, and other institutional information or assessment is invaluableto constructing an effective Action Plan for improvement.
Factor Performance // AggregateBelow is your institution's current performance for Quality of Nursing Instruction and its scaled questions. While this factor might be difficult toimprove directly, improving its scaled questions will likely be easier and will result in an improvement in the factor.
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 1 // Satisfaction: Quality of Nursing Instruction 59 4.87 1.15 64.5%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR QUESTION PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Q032 // Teaching in your clinical courses 56 5.16 1.19 69.3%
Q037 // Accessibility of faculty outside class 56 5.14 1.39 69.0%
Q038 // Faculty responsiveness to student concerns 57 4.95 1.44 65.8%
Q033 // Teaching in your classroom courses 56 4.70 1.41 61.7%
Q035 // Feedback on assignments (other than grades) you received from instructors inyour classroom courses
56 4.52 1.40 58.7%
Q034 // Feedback on assignments (other than grades) you received from instructors inyour clinical courses
57 4.49 1.29 58.2%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 1 // Satisfaction: Quality of Nursing Instruction
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 1 // 2©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factor Performance // Key PopulationsKey categorical questions have been selected and are reported below. Answer options within each categorical question are divided into twogroups in order to facilitate a statistical testing of means; a designates the population which is statistically higher than the other population, a
designates the population that is statistically lower and an indicates that the populations have statistically equal factor means. Relativepopulation size (% Total) and Performance values for each group are plotted. To review this factor reported by all categorical questions and for allanswer options, please refer to the Online Reporting.
If this factor is included in your Action Plan, consider the behavior of these populations to determine if targeted interventions are needed.
WHAT IS YOUR GENDER?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
Female 51 4.90 1.20 65.0%
52 86.7% Male 8 4.74 0.73 62.3%
8 13.3% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
RACE/ETHNICITY (REPORTING ONLY)
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
White 57 4.86 1.16 64.3%
57 95% All others N/A 2 NR NR NR NR
3 5% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
HOW MANY YEARS OF FULL-TIME HEALTH RELATED WORK EXPERIENCE DID YOU HAVE PRIOR TO ENTERING THIS PROGRAM?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
One or more years of work experience 26 4.98 1.26 66.3%
27 45% Less than one year of work experience 33 4.79 1.04 63.2%
33 55% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
WHAT IS YOUR CUMULATIVE GPA?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
3.00 GPA and higher 52 4.98 1.04 66.3%
53 89.8% Below 3.00 GPA 6 3.94 1.60 49.0%
6 10.2% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 1 // Satisfaction: Quality of Nursing Instruction
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 1 // 3©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
WHAT WAS YOUR SAT MATH+VERBAL OR ACT COMPOSITE SCORE? (HIGHEST SCORE IF YOU TOOK MULTIPLE TESTS)
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
SAT 1240 / ACT 27 and below 17 4.84 0.83 64.0%
17 70.8% SAT 1241 / ACT 28 and higher 7 4.50 1.05 58.3%
7 29.2% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 1 // Satisfaction: Quality of Nursing Instruction
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 1 // 4©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factor Performance // Degree ProgramIn this report, the institutional mean and a breakdown by Degree Program is provided. If this factor is included in your Action Plan, identify thepopulations reporting more positive experiences in order to examine if there are best practices that can be applied to populations reporting lesspositive experiences.
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 1 // Satisfaction: Quality of Nursing Instruction 59 4.87 1.15 64.5%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR PERFORMANCE BY DEGREE PROGRAM
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
RN-to-BSN (completed an RN) 13 5.46 1.32 74.3%
BSN, with no prior nursing experience or degree 44 4.68 1.04 61.3%
BSN, have completed other non-nursing degree(s) 2 NR NR NR NR
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 1 // Satisfaction: Quality of Nursing Instruction
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 1 // 5©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
In this report, Skyfactor Benchworks compares your institutional results to your Select 6, Carnegie Class, and all participating institutions for thefactor and its scaled questions. A designates where your institution’s mean is statistically higher than the comparative group; a designateswhere your institution’s mean is statistically lower than the comparative group; and designates where your institution’s mean is statisticallyequal to the comparative group. A ranking of your institution and the external benchmarking groups is also provided. If your institution’sperformance is below that of an external benchmarking group, use this information to motivate staff that higher performance is possible; but ifyour institutional performance is higher, celebrate!
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 59 4.87 1.15 -- -- -- -- 64.5%
Select 6 440 5.05 1.02 4.65 5.46 5/7 67.5%
Carnegie Class 755 5.10 1.15 4.32 6.49 16/23 68.3%
All Institutions 26,769 4.98 1.14 3.36 6.49 163/270 66.3%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR QUESTION PERFORMANCE
SELECT 6CARNEGIE
CLASSALL
INST. N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Q032 // Teaching in your clinical courses 56 5.16 1.19 69.3%
Q037 // Accessibility of faculty outside class 56 5.14 1.39 69.0%
Q038 // Faculty responsiveness to studentconcerns
57 4.95 1.44 65.8%
Q033 // Teaching in your classroom courses 56 4.70 1.41 61.7%
Q035 // Feedback on assignments (other thangrades) you received from instructors in yourclassroom courses
56 4.52 1.40 58.7%
Q034 // Feedback on assignments (other thangrades) you received from instructors in yourclinical courses
57 4.49 1.29 58.2%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 1 // Quality of Nursing Instruction
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 1 // 6©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
The final analysis for the factor is its performance over time. Longitudinal trends support continuous improvement and are the key to evaluatingthe success of your institution’s action plan for this factor. If your institution’s current performance falls short of expectations, review the actionsconducted and make adjustments.
If your institution participated in two or more iterations of this assessment, a longitudinal trend is plotted. If your institution did not participatecontinuously, Skyfactor extrapolated between successive iterations. A designates years where your institution performs statistically higherthan the current year; a designates years where your program is statistically lower in performance; and a represents years that arestatistically equal to the current year.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
50%
60%
70%
80%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 71.9% 68.5% 68.4% 54.4% 64.6%
Mean 5.31 5.11 5.11 4.27 4.87
FACTOR 1 // Satisfaction: Quality of Nursing Instruction
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 1 // 7©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q032 // Quality of Nursing Instruction // Rate the quality of the BSN program regarding: Teaching in yourclinical courses
A summary of Q032 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 56 5.16 1.19 -- -- -- -- 69.3%
Select 6 435 5.36 1.14 5.16 5.82 7/7 72.7%
Carnegie Class 710 5.26 1.24 4.22 6.64 14/22 71.0%
All Institutions 24,589 5.29 1.24 3.90 6.64 172/267 71.5%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
VERY POOR ------------------------------------- GOOD ------------------------------------- EXCEPTIONAL
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 0.0% 1.8% 7.1% 19.6% 28.6% 30.4% 12.5%
Select 6 0.5% 0.7% 5.1% 14.7% 28.7% 35.6% 14.7%
Carnegie Class 0.4% 1.0% 7.7% 18.0% 25.1% 31.9% 15.9%
All Institutions 0.5% 1.5% 6.8% 15.7% 26.7% 32.9% 15.9%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
60%
70%
80%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 72.6% 69.7% 68.5% 60.8% 69.3%
Mean 5.35 5.18 5.11 4.65 5.16
FACTOR 1 // Satisfaction: Quality of Nursing Instruction // Q032
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 1 // 8©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q033 // Quality of Nursing Instruction // Rate the quality of the BSN program regarding: Teaching in yourclassroom courses
A summary of Q033 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 56 4.70 1.41 -- -- -- -- 61.7%
Select 6 439 4.90 1.23 4.27 5.64 5/7 65.0%
Carnegie Class 735 5.04 1.26 3.67 6.36 16/22 67.3%
All Institutions 25,855 4.90 1.33 3.10 6.36 177/268 65.0%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
VERY POOR ------------------------------------- GOOD ------------------------------------- EXCEPTIONAL
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 1.8% 7.1% 5.4% 33.9% 17.9% 25.0% 8.9%
Select 6 0.2% 1.6% 12.3% 23.5% 27.8% 25.7% 8.9%
Carnegie Class 0.6% 2.3% 8.3% 23.8% 25.4% 27.8% 11.8%
All Institutions 1.0% 3.1% 11.2% 20.6% 28.0% 25.6% 10.5%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
50%
60%
70%
80%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 71.5% 68.0% 67.1% 55.1% 61.6%
Mean 5.29 5.08 5.03 4.31 4.70
FACTOR 1 // Satisfaction: Quality of Nursing Instruction // Q033
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 1 // 9©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q034 // Quality of Nursing Instruction // Rate the quality of the BSN program regarding: Feedback onassignments (other than grades) you received from instructors in your clinical courses
A summary of Q034 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 57 4.49 1.29 -- -- -- -- 58.2%
Select 6 435 5.15 1.22 4.49 5.45 7/7 69.2%
Carnegie Class 720 5.00 1.34 4.22 6.36 22/23 66.7%
All Institutions 25,026 5.02 1.32 3.65 6.36 248/268 67.0%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
VERY POOR ------------------------------------- GOOD ------------------------------------- EXCEPTIONAL
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 1.8% 3.5% 17.5% 22.8% 36.8% 10.5% 7.0%
Select 6 0.0% 1.4% 9.0% 20.0% 25.7% 31.0% 12.9%
Carnegie Class 1.5% 1.8% 10.2% 22.8% 25.2% 26.0% 12.5%
All Institutions 0.8% 2.4% 9.9% 20.9% 26.3% 27.0% 12.8%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
40%
50%
60%
70%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 65.6% 59.6% 61.1% 50.0% 58.2%
Mean 4.94 4.58 4.67 4.00 4.49
FACTOR 1 // Satisfaction: Quality of Nursing Instruction // Q034
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 1 // 10©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q035 // Quality of Nursing Instruction // Rate the quality of the BSN program regarding: Feedback onassignments (other than grades) you received from instructors in your classroom courses
A summary of Q035 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 56 4.52 1.40 -- -- -- -- 58.7%
Select 6 436 4.66 1.28 4.35 5.14 6/7 61.0%
Carnegie Class 736 4.84 1.34 4.08 6.21 18/22 64.0%
All Institutions 26,044 4.71 1.38 3.25 6.21 181/268 61.8%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
VERY POOR ------------------------------------- GOOD ------------------------------------- EXCEPTIONAL
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 3.6% 1.8% 16.1% 28.6% 28.6% 10.7% 10.7%
Select 6 0.2% 3.7% 14.9% 27.3% 27.3% 18.1% 8.5%
Carnegie Class 1.4% 2.5% 12.9% 23.9% 25.6% 23.1% 10.6%
All Institutions 1.3% 4.4% 13.7% 23.9% 25.8% 21.6% 9.3%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
40%
50%
60%
70%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 65.6% 58.3% 59.2% 50.7% 58.6%
Mean 4.94 4.50 4.55 4.04 4.52
FACTOR 1 // Satisfaction: Quality of Nursing Instruction // Q035
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 1 // 11©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q037 // Quality of Nursing Instruction // Rate the quality of the BSN program regarding: Accessibility offaculty outside class
A summary of Q037 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 56 5.14 1.39 -- -- -- -- 69.0%
Select 6 434 5.20 1.29 4.68 5.86 5/7 70.0%
Carnegie Class 741 5.38 1.41 4.50 6.64 14/22 73.0%
All Institutions 25,731 5.12 1.39 3.43 6.75 135/268 68.7%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
VERY POOR ------------------------------------- GOOD ------------------------------------- EXCEPTIONAL
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 0.0% 3.6% 10.7% 17.9% 23.2% 25.0% 19.6%
Select 6 0.5% 1.4% 8.8% 18.4% 26.7% 26.7% 17.5%
Carnegie Class 0.8% 2.0% 8.0% 17.4% 19.9% 24.6% 27.2%
All Institutions 1.1% 2.5% 9.2% 19.4% 23.6% 26.3% 17.8%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
50%
60%
70%
80%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 77.4% 78.4% 77.6% 58.6% 69.0%
Mean 5.65 5.70 5.66 4.51 5.14
FACTOR 1 // Satisfaction: Quality of Nursing Instruction // Q037
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 1 // 12©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q038 // Quality of Nursing Instruction // Rate the quality of the BSN program regarding: Facultyresponsiveness to student concerns
A summary of Q038 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 57 4.95 1.44 -- -- -- -- 65.8%
Select 6 439 5.02 1.38 4.35 5.58 5/7 67.0%
Carnegie Class 750 5.05 1.63 3.71 6.71 14/23 67.5%
All Institutions 26,430 4.87 1.56 2.62 6.71 127/269 64.5%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
VERY POOR ------------------------------------- GOOD ------------------------------------- EXCEPTIONAL
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 0.0% 8.8% 5.3% 22.8% 24.6% 22.8% 15.8%
Select 6 0.2% 3.4% 11.4% 22.3% 19.8% 27.6% 15.3%
Carnegie Class 2.7% 4.7% 11.2% 16.9% 19.1% 22.3% 23.2%
All Institutions 2.8% 5.0% 12.1% 18.8% 21.4% 24.0% 15.9%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 78.8% 77.0% 75.4% 52.0% 65.8%
Mean 5.73 5.62 5.52 4.12 4.95
FACTOR 1 // Satisfaction: Quality of Nursing Instruction // Q038
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 1 // 13©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factors, a composite of scaled questions that explain a larger concept, are utilized in Skyfactor Benchworks’ reporting to reduce complexity andstrengthen the analysis. Skyfactor provides an in-depth analysis of the factor, Work and Class Size, in this section of reports.
You are likely referencing this section to better understand this factor due to: 1) this factor is a high predictor; 2) this factor is performing below adesired level; 3) this factor is of special interest to your institution; or 4) this factor is an indicator. Through this analysis (i.e., currentperformance, external benchmark comparisons, and longitudinal trends), a thorough picture of the factor should emerge, however additionalinformation can be found in Skyfactor Benchworks’ Online Reports.
If improving this factor is a goal for your institution, actions should be targeted toward the factor’s scaled questions (see list below) which aremore tangible and more directly actionable. Analysis for these scaled questions is provided in this section allowing for sufficient understanding;additional information can be found in Skyfactor Benchworks’ Online Reports.
FACTOR COMPOSITION
Work and Class Size // How satisfied are you with the:
Q046 // Amount of work required of you in your classroom courses
Q047 // Amount of work required of you in your clinical courses
Q048 // Amount of collaboration required in your courses
Q049 // Value you derived from your collaboration experiences
FACTOR 2 // Satisfaction: Work and Class Size
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 2 // 1©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
There are many pieces of analysis that, when combined, create a comprehensive picture of your institution’s performance for this factor. The firstanalysis to examine is the current performance of the factor. This information, coupled with understanding of individual population perceptions,external benchmarks, longitudinal trends, individual scaled question performance, and other institutional information or assessment is invaluableto constructing an effective Action Plan for improvement.
Factor Performance // AggregateBelow is your institution's current performance for Work and Class Size and its scaled questions. While this factor might be difficult to improvedirectly, improving its scaled questions will likely be easier and will result in an improvement in the factor.
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 2 // Satisfaction: Work and Class Size 59 5.08 1.08 68.0%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR QUESTION PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Q047 // Amount of work required of you in your clinical courses 57 5.14 1.48 69.0%
Q049 // Value you derived from your collaboration experiences 59 5.12 1.32 68.7%
Q048 // Amount of collaboration required in your courses 59 5.08 1.25 68.0%
Q046 // Amount of work required of you in your classroom courses 56 4.93 1.28 65.5%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 2 // Satisfaction: Work and Class Size
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 2 // 2©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factor Performance // Key PopulationsKey categorical questions have been selected and are reported below. Answer options within each categorical question are divided into twogroups in order to facilitate a statistical testing of means; a designates the population which is statistically higher than the other population, a
designates the population that is statistically lower and an indicates that the populations have statistically equal factor means. Relativepopulation size (% Total) and Performance values for each group are plotted. To review this factor reported by all categorical questions and for allanswer options, please refer to the Online Reporting.
If this factor is included in your Action Plan, consider the behavior of these populations to determine if targeted interventions are needed.
WHAT IS YOUR GENDER?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
Female 51 5.09 1.13 68.2%
52 86.7% Male 8 4.99 0.67 66.5%
8 13.3% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
RACE/ETHNICITY (REPORTING ONLY)
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
White 57 5.05 1.09 67.5%
57 95% All others N/A 2 NR NR NR NR
3 5% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
HOW MANY YEARS OF FULL-TIME HEALTH RELATED WORK EXPERIENCE DID YOU HAVE PRIOR TO ENTERING THIS PROGRAM?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
One or more years of work experience 26 5.20 1.16 70.0%
27 45% Less than one year of work experience 33 4.98 1.01 66.3%
33 55% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
WHAT IS YOUR CUMULATIVE GPA?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
3.00 GPA and higher 52 5.23 0.99 70.5%
53 89.8% Below 3.00 GPA 6 3.62 0.80 43.7%
6 10.2% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 2 // Satisfaction: Work and Class Size
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 2 // 3©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
WHAT WAS YOUR SAT MATH+VERBAL OR ACT COMPOSITE SCORE? (HIGHEST SCORE IF YOU TOOK MULTIPLE TESTS)
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
SAT 1240 / ACT 27 and below 17 4.85 0.75 64.2%
17 70.8% SAT 1241 / ACT 28 and higher 7 4.18 1.35 53.0%
7 29.2% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 2 // Satisfaction: Work and Class Size
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 2 // 4©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factor Performance // Degree ProgramIn this report, the institutional mean and a breakdown by Degree Program is provided. If this factor is included in your Action Plan, identify thepopulations reporting more positive experiences in order to examine if there are best practices that can be applied to populations reporting lesspositive experiences.
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 2 // Satisfaction: Work and Class Size 59 5.08 1.08 68.0%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR PERFORMANCE BY DEGREE PROGRAM
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
RN-to-BSN (completed an RN) 13 5.60 1.07 76.7%
BSN, with no prior nursing experience or degree 44 4.93 1.06 65.5%
BSN, have completed other non-nursing degree(s) 2 NR NR NR NR
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 2 // Satisfaction: Work and Class Size
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 2 // 5©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
In this report, Skyfactor Benchworks compares your institutional results to your Select 6, Carnegie Class, and all participating institutions for thefactor and its scaled questions. A designates where your institution’s mean is statistically higher than the comparative group; a designateswhere your institution’s mean is statistically lower than the comparative group; and designates where your institution’s mean is statisticallyequal to the comparative group. A ranking of your institution and the external benchmarking groups is also provided. If your institution’sperformance is below that of an external benchmarking group, use this information to motivate staff that higher performance is possible; but ifyour institutional performance is higher, celebrate!
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 59 5.08 1.08 -- -- -- -- 68.0%
Select 6 439 5.11 1.14 4.52 6.39 5/7 68.5%
Carnegie Class 752 5.29 1.26 4.47 6.45 15/23 71.5%
All Institutions 26,381 5.07 1.25 4.02 6.75 134/270 67.8%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR QUESTION PERFORMANCE
SELECT 6CARNEGIE
CLASSALL
INST. N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Q047 // Amount of work required of you in yourclinical courses
57 5.14 1.48 69.0%
Q049 // Value you derived from your collaborationexperiences
59 5.12 1.32 68.7%
Q048 // Amount of collaboration required in yourcourses
59 5.08 1.25 68.0%
Q046 // Amount of work required of you in yourclassroom courses
56 4.93 1.28 65.5%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 2 // Work and Class Size
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 2 // 6©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
The final analysis for the factor is its performance over time. Longitudinal trends support continuous improvement and are the key to evaluatingthe success of your institution’s action plan for this factor. If your institution’s current performance falls short of expectations, review the actionsconducted and make adjustments.
If your institution participated in two or more iterations of this assessment, a longitudinal trend is plotted. If your institution did not participatecontinuously, Skyfactor extrapolated between successive iterations. A designates years where your institution performs statistically higherthan the current year; a designates years where your program is statistically lower in performance; and a represents years that arestatistically equal to the current year.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
50%
60%
70%
80%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 72.2% 72.6% 74.9% 57.5% 68.0%
Mean 5.33 5.36 5.49 4.45 5.08
FACTOR 2 // Satisfaction: Work and Class Size
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 2 // 7©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q046 // Course Work // How satisfied are you with the: Amount of work required of you in your classroomcourses
A summary of Q046 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 56 4.93 1.28 -- -- -- -- 65.5%
Select 6 438 5.02 1.35 4.11 6.29 5/7 67.0%
Carnegie Class 743 5.26 1.37 3.62 6.40 17/22 71.0%
All Institutions 25,962 5.05 1.42 3.62 6.75 167/267 67.5%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
VERY DISSATISFIED ------------------------------ NEUTRAL ------------------------------ VERY SATISFIED
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 0.0% 1.8% 10.7% 28.6% 25.0% 19.6% 14.3%
Select 6 0.7% 5.0% 8.0% 18.0% 26.0% 30.6% 11.6%
Carnegie Class 1.0% 2.9% 6.5% 18.4% 23.4% 28.3% 19.5%
All Institutions 2.0% 3.1% 7.7% 20.1% 24.6% 26.7% 15.8%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
50%
60%
70%
80%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 71.2% 71.9% 75.4% 59.3% 65.5%
Mean 5.27 5.32 5.52 4.56 4.93
FACTOR 2 // Satisfaction: Work and Class Size // Q046
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 2 // 8©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q047 // Course Work // How satisfied are you with the: Amount of work required of you in your clinicalcourses
A summary of Q047 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 57 5.14 1.48 -- -- -- -- 69.0%
Select 6 434 5.23 1.33 4.72 6.14 5/7 70.5%
Carnegie Class 714 5.29 1.47 4.39 6.33 14/23 71.5%
All Institutions 24,071 5.08 1.44 3.80 6.75 119/267 68.0%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
VERY DISSATISFIED ------------------------------ NEUTRAL ------------------------------ VERY SATISFIED
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 1.8% 5.3% 3.5% 21.1% 26.3% 19.3% 22.8%
Select 6 1.6% 2.1% 6.2% 16.4% 25.3% 32.5% 15.9%
Carnegie Class 2.3% 3.1% 5.6% 17.0% 20.6% 28.4% 23.0%
All Institutions 2.0% 3.1% 8.3% 19.3% 23.4% 26.6% 17.3%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 63.9% 65.8% 72.4% 50.0% 69.0%
Mean 4.83 4.95 5.34 4.00 5.14
FACTOR 2 // Satisfaction: Work and Class Size // Q047
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 2 // 9©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q048 // Course Work // How satisfied are you with the: Amount of collaboration required in your courses
A summary of Q048 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 59 5.08 1.25 -- -- -- -- 68.0%
Select 6 435 5.13 1.33 4.71 6.57 4/7 68.8%
Carnegie Class 744 5.31 1.41 4.49 6.57 13/23 71.8%
All Institutions 25,959 5.07 1.42 3.68 6.75 128/269 67.8%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
VERY DISSATISFIED ------------------------------ NEUTRAL ------------------------------ VERY SATISFIED
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 3.4% 0.0% 3.4% 22.0% 28.8% 33.9% 8.5%
Select 6 1.4% 3.7% 3.9% 20.9% 25.7% 30.1% 14.3%
Carnegie Class 1.7% 2.6% 4.7% 17.9% 23.3% 27.9% 21.8%
All Institutions 2.1% 2.9% 6.8% 22.1% 23.4% 26.1% 16.7%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
50%
60%
70%
80%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 75.7% 75.9% 74.8% 60.4% 68.1%
Mean 5.54 5.55 5.49 4.63 5.08
FACTOR 2 // Satisfaction: Work and Class Size // Q048
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 2 // 10©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q049 // Course Work // How satisfied are you with the: Value you derived from your collaboration experiences
A summary of Q049 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 59 5.12 1.32 -- -- -- -- 68.7%
Select 6 431 5.06 1.44 4.68 6.57 4/7 67.7%
Carnegie Class 731 5.30 1.54 4.36 6.64 12/23 71.7%
All Institutions 25,965 5.07 1.54 3.87 6.75 124/269 67.8%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
VERY DISSATISFIED ------------------------------ NEUTRAL ------------------------------ VERY SATISFIED
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 3.4% 0.0% 3.4% 25.4% 22.0% 33.9% 11.9%
Select 6 1.6% 5.1% 6.7% 18.6% 22.5% 30.6% 14.8%
Carnegie Class 2.7% 3.9% 4.7% 16.5% 20.4% 27.1% 24.8%
All Institutions 3.1% 4.2% 6.7% 19.3% 21.2% 25.9% 19.6%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
60%
70%
80%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 78.1% 76.8% 78.2% 61.2% 68.6%
Mean 5.69 5.61 5.69 4.67 5.12
FACTOR 2 // Satisfaction: Work and Class Size // Q049
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 2 // 11©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factors, a composite of scaled questions that explain a larger concept, are utilized in Skyfactor Benchworks’ reporting to reduce complexity andstrengthen the analysis. Skyfactor provides an in-depth analysis of the factor, Course Lecture and Interaction, in this section of reports.
You are likely referencing this section to better understand this factor due to: 1) this factor is a high predictor; 2) this factor is performing below adesired level; 3) this factor is of special interest to your institution; or 4) this factor is an indicator. Through this analysis (i.e., currentperformance, external benchmark comparisons, and longitudinal trends), a thorough picture of the factor should emerge, however additionalinformation can be found in Skyfactor Benchworks’ Online Reports.
If improving this factor is a goal for your institution, actions should be targeted toward the factor’s scaled questions (see list below) which aremore tangible and more directly actionable. Analysis for these scaled questions is provided in this section allowing for sufficient understanding;additional information can be found in Skyfactor Benchworks’ Online Reports.
FACTOR COMPOSITION
Course Lecture and Interaction // How satisfied are you with the faculty's ability to:
Q039 // Relate concepts to the real world
Q040 // Draw on experience of students
Q041 // Engage students in discussions
Q042 // Communicate effectively
Q043 // Effectively sequence content of courses
Q044 // Interact with students
Q045 // Act as effective role models in clinical practice
FACTOR 3 // Satisfaction: Course Lecture and Interaction
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 3 // 1©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
There are many pieces of analysis that, when combined, create a comprehensive picture of your institution’s performance for this factor. The firstanalysis to examine is the current performance of the factor. This information, coupled with understanding of individual population perceptions,external benchmarks, longitudinal trends, individual scaled question performance, and other institutional information or assessment is invaluableto constructing an effective Action Plan for improvement.
Factor Performance // AggregateBelow is your institution's current performance for Course Lecture and Interaction and its scaled questions. While this factor might be difficult toimprove directly, improving its scaled questions will likely be easier and will result in an improvement in the factor.
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 3 // Satisfaction: Course Lecture and Interaction 59 5.56 1.01 76.0%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR QUESTION PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Q045 // Act as effective role models in clinical practice 56 5.79 1.06 79.8%
Q044 // Interact with students 59 5.68 1.19 78.0%
Q041 // Engage students in discussions 59 5.64 1.26 77.3%
Q039 // Relate concepts to the real world 59 5.63 1.18 77.2%
Q042 // Communicate effectively 59 5.49 1.32 74.8%
Q043 // Effectively sequence content of courses 59 5.36 1.32 72.7%
Q040 // Draw on experience of students 58 5.33 1.26 72.2%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 3 // Satisfaction: Course Lecture and Interaction
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 3 // 2©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factor Performance // Key PopulationsKey categorical questions have been selected and are reported below. Answer options within each categorical question are divided into twogroups in order to facilitate a statistical testing of means; a designates the population which is statistically higher than the other population, a
designates the population that is statistically lower and an indicates that the populations have statistically equal factor means. Relativepopulation size (% Total) and Performance values for each group are plotted. To review this factor reported by all categorical questions and for allanswer options, please refer to the Online Reporting.
If this factor is included in your Action Plan, consider the behavior of these populations to determine if targeted interventions are needed.
WHAT IS YOUR GENDER?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
Female 51 5.58 1.06 76.3%
52 86.7% Male 8 5.41 0.54 73.5%
8 13.3% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
RACE/ETHNICITY (REPORTING ONLY)
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
White 57 5.54 1.02 75.7%
57 95% All others N/A 2 NR NR NR NR
3 5% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
HOW MANY YEARS OF FULL-TIME HEALTH RELATED WORK EXPERIENCE DID YOU HAVE PRIOR TO ENTERING THIS PROGRAM?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
One or more years of work experience 26 5.76 1.07 79.3%
27 45% Less than one year of work experience 33 5.41 0.93 73.5%
33 55% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
WHAT IS YOUR CUMULATIVE GPA?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
3.00 GPA and higher 52 5.65 0.97 77.5%
53 89.8% Below 3.00 GPA 6 4.71 1.06 61.8%
6 10.2% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 3 // Satisfaction: Course Lecture and Interaction
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 3 // 3©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
WHAT WAS YOUR SAT MATH+VERBAL OR ACT COMPOSITE SCORE? (HIGHEST SCORE IF YOU TOOK MULTIPLE TESTS)
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
SAT 1240 / ACT 27 and below 17 5.43 0.71 73.8%
17 70.8% SAT 1241 / ACT 28 and higher 7 4.90 1.38 65.0%
7 29.2% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 3 // Satisfaction: Course Lecture and Interaction
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 3 // 4©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factor Performance // Degree ProgramIn this report, the institutional mean and a breakdown by Degree Program is provided. If this factor is included in your Action Plan, identify thepopulations reporting more positive experiences in order to examine if there are best practices that can be applied to populations reporting lesspositive experiences.
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 3 // Satisfaction: Course Lecture and Interaction 59 5.56 1.01 76.0%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR PERFORMANCE BY DEGREE PROGRAM
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
RN-to-BSN (completed an RN) 13 6.06 0.89 84.3%
BSN, with no prior nursing experience or degree 44 5.40 1.01 73.3%
BSN, have completed other non-nursing degree(s) 2 NR NR NR NR
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 3 // Satisfaction: Course Lecture and Interaction
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 3 // 5©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
In this report, Skyfactor Benchworks compares your institutional results to your Select 6, Carnegie Class, and all participating institutions for thefactor and its scaled questions. A designates where your institution’s mean is statistically higher than the comparative group; a designateswhere your institution’s mean is statistically lower than the comparative group; and designates where your institution’s mean is statisticallyequal to the comparative group. A ranking of your institution and the external benchmarking groups is also provided. If your institution’sperformance is below that of an external benchmarking group, use this information to motivate staff that higher performance is possible; but ifyour institutional performance is higher, celebrate!
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 59 5.56 1.01 -- -- -- -- 76.0%
Select 6 440 5.65 0.99 5.13 6.31 5/7 77.5%
Carnegie Class 829 5.79 1.10 4.90 6.81 18/24 79.8%
All Institutions 26,768 5.55 1.15 4.01 6.81 140/271 75.8%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR QUESTION PERFORMANCE
SELECT 6CARNEGIE
CLASSALL
INST. N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Q045 // Act as effective role models in clinicalpractice
56 5.79 1.06 79.8%
Q044 // Interact with students 59 5.68 1.19 78.0%
Q041 // Engage students in discussions 59 5.64 1.26 77.3%
Q039 // Relate concepts to the real world 59 5.63 1.18 77.2%
Q042 // Communicate effectively 59 5.49 1.32 74.8%
Q043 // Effectively sequence content of courses 59 5.36 1.32 72.7%
Q040 // Draw on experience of students 58 5.33 1.26 72.2%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 3 // Course Lecture and Interaction
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 3 // 6©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
The final analysis for the factor is its performance over time. Longitudinal trends support continuous improvement and are the key to evaluatingthe success of your institution’s action plan for this factor. If your institution’s current performance falls short of expectations, review the actionsconducted and make adjustments.
If your institution participated in two or more iterations of this assessment, a longitudinal trend is plotted. If your institution did not participatecontinuously, Skyfactor extrapolated between successive iterations. A designates years where your institution performs statistically higherthan the current year; a designates years where your program is statistically lower in performance; and a represents years that arestatistically equal to the current year.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
60%
70%
80%
90%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 82.0% 81.7% 79.6% 67.0% 76.0%
Mean 5.92 5.90 5.78 5.02 5.56
FACTOR 3 // Satisfaction: Course Lecture and Interaction
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 3 // 7©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q039 // Engaging Pedagogies // How satisfied are you with the faculty's ability to: Relate concepts to the realworld
A summary of Q039 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 59 5.63 1.18 -- -- -- -- 77.2%
Select 6 439 5.73 1.14 5.32 6.14 5/7 78.8%
Carnegie Class 826 5.86 1.22 5.05 6.67 17/24 81.0%
All Institutions 26,666 5.65 1.28 3.81 7.00 145/271 77.5%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
VERY DISSATISFIED ------------------------------ NEUTRAL ------------------------------ VERY SATISFIED
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 0.0% 1.7% 0.0% 20.3% 16.9% 33.9% 27.1%
Select 6 0.5% 0.7% 2.5% 10.0% 22.8% 34.9% 28.7%
Carnegie Class 0.7% 0.8% 2.5% 10.4% 19.2% 27.8% 38.6%
All Institutions 1.0% 1.4% 3.4% 12.2% 20.8% 30.7% 30.5%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
60%
70%
80%
90%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 82.3% 81.6% 78.4% 67.9% 77.1%
Mean 5.94 5.89 5.70 5.07 5.63
FACTOR 3 // Satisfaction: Course Lecture and Interaction // Q039
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 3 // 8©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q040 // Engaging Pedagogies // How satisfied are you with the faculty's ability to: Draw on experience ofstudents
A summary of Q040 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 58 5.33 1.26 -- -- -- -- 72.2%
Select 6 437 5.51 1.22 4.98 6.43 5/7 75.2%
Carnegie Class 822 5.71 1.26 4.67 6.79 20/24 78.5%
All Institutions 26,433 5.45 1.35 3.53 7.00 175/271 74.2%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
VERY DISSATISFIED ------------------------------ NEUTRAL ------------------------------ VERY SATISFIED
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 1.7% 0.0% 5.2% 19.0% 22.4% 34.5% 17.2%
Select 6 0.5% 1.1% 5.0% 12.8% 24.0% 34.1% 22.4%
Carnegie Class 0.9% 0.8% 3.4% 12.2% 21.8% 28.1% 32.8%
All Institutions 1.3% 1.8% 4.5% 15.3% 22.4% 28.9% 25.8%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
60%
70%
80%
90%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 82.3% 83.8% 77.5% 64.9% 72.1%
Mean 5.94 6.03 5.65 4.90 5.33
FACTOR 3 // Satisfaction: Course Lecture and Interaction // Q040
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 3 // 9©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q041 // Engaging Pedagogies // How satisfied are you with the faculty's ability to: Engage students indiscussions
A summary of Q041 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 59 5.64 1.26 -- -- -- -- 77.3%
Select 6 435 5.67 1.16 5.15 6.43 5/7 77.8%
Carnegie Class 818 5.85 1.27 4.96 6.86 15/24 80.8%
All Institutions 26,499 5.59 1.28 4.00 7.00 134/271 76.5%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
VERY DISSATISFIED ------------------------------ NEUTRAL ------------------------------ VERY SATISFIED
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 1.7% 0.0% 1.7% 16.9% 16.9% 33.9% 28.8%
Select 6 0.2% 0.7% 3.9% 11.3% 22.1% 34.9% 26.9%
Carnegie Class 1.0% 1.3% 3.4% 8.2% 16.5% 32.5% 37.1%
All Institutions 0.9% 1.4% 3.9% 12.8% 22.3% 30.1% 28.6%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
60%
70%
80%
90%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 85.5% 86.0% 81.5% 68.6% 77.4%
Mean 6.13 6.16 5.89 5.12 5.64
FACTOR 3 // Satisfaction: Course Lecture and Interaction // Q041
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 3 // 10©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q042 // Engaging Pedagogies // How satisfied are you with the faculty's ability to: Communicate effectively
A summary of Q042 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 59 5.49 1.32 -- -- -- -- 74.8%
Select 6 433 5.48 1.24 4.75 6.17 5/7 74.7%
Carnegie Class 805 5.58 1.38 4.00 6.79 16/23 76.3%
All Institutions 26,377 5.40 1.41 3.53 6.79 127/270 73.3%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
VERY DISSATISFIED ------------------------------ NEUTRAL ------------------------------ VERY SATISFIED
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 0.0% 1.7% 10.2% 6.8% 27.1% 27.1% 27.1%
Select 6 0.7% 1.4% 5.8% 10.9% 25.2% 35.1% 21.0%
Carnegie Class 1.2% 2.0% 6.4% 10.1% 20.5% 29.6% 30.3%
All Institutions 1.9% 2.3% 5.7% 12.9% 22.6% 30.3% 24.3%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 80.6% 76.1% 76.9% 60.9% 74.9%
Mean 5.83 5.57 5.61 4.66 5.49
FACTOR 3 // Satisfaction: Course Lecture and Interaction // Q042
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 3 // 11©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q043 // Engaging Pedagogies // How satisfied are you with the faculty's ability to: Effectively sequencecontent of courses
A summary of Q043 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 59 5.36 1.32 -- -- -- -- 72.7%
Select 6 434 5.44 1.31 4.90 6.29 5/7 74.0%
Carnegie Class 746 5.64 1.32 4.22 6.79 18/23 77.3%
All Institutions 26,366 5.41 1.38 3.78 6.79 154/270 73.5%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
VERY DISSATISFIED ------------------------------ NEUTRAL ------------------------------ VERY SATISFIED
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 0.0% 3.4% 3.4% 23.7% 15.3% 32.2% 22.0%
Select 6 0.9% 3.2% 3.7% 12.0% 25.8% 32.0% 22.4%
Carnegie Class 1.1% 2.1% 3.6% 10.2% 23.5% 28.6% 30.9%
All Institutions 1.5% 2.4% 5.2% 13.9% 22.4% 30.3% 24.2%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
60%
70%
80%
90%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 81.2% 79.7% 82.9% 68.9% 72.6%
Mean 5.87 5.78 5.97 5.13 5.36
FACTOR 3 // Satisfaction: Course Lecture and Interaction // Q043
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 3 // 12©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q044 // Engaging Pedagogies // How satisfied are you with the faculty's ability to: Interact with students
A summary of Q044 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 59 5.68 1.19 -- -- -- -- 78.0%
Select 6 431 5.81 1.16 5.34 6.43 5/7 80.2%
Carnegie Class 814 5.87 1.27 4.95 6.87 17/23 81.2%
All Institutions 26,252 5.62 1.29 3.78 7.00 132/270 77.0%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
VERY DISSATISFIED ------------------------------ NEUTRAL ------------------------------ VERY SATISFIED
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 0.0% 1.7% 5.1% 8.5% 18.6% 40.7% 25.4%
Select 6 0.2% 1.2% 2.8% 8.8% 20.0% 33.9% 33.2%
Carnegie Class 0.6% 1.7% 3.8% 8.2% 15.1% 32.0% 38.6%
All Institutions 1.1% 1.6% 3.7% 11.9% 20.6% 32.3% 28.9%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
60%
70%
80%
90%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 79.5% 81.6% 76.6% 67.9% 78.0%
Mean 5.77 5.89 5.59 5.07 5.68
FACTOR 3 // Satisfaction: Course Lecture and Interaction // Q044
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 3 // 13©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q045 // Engaging Pedagogies // How satisfied are you with the faculty's ability to: Act as effective rolemodels in clinical practice
A summary of Q045 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 56 5.79 1.06 -- -- -- -- 79.8%
Select 6 434 5.89 1.13 5.33 6.33 5/7 81.5%
Carnegie Class 721 5.93 1.29 5.00 6.93 16/22 82.2%
All Institutions 25,022 5.76 1.30 4.22 6.93 141/268 79.3%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
VERY DISSATISFIED ------------------------------ NEUTRAL ------------------------------ VERY SATISFIED
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 0.0% 1.8% 1.8% 5.4% 25.0% 39.3% 26.8%
Select 6 0.7% 0.7% 1.4% 8.5% 18.7% 35.0% 35.0%
Carnegie Class 1.0% 1.8% 2.4% 7.7% 14.4% 30.6% 42.0%
All Institutions 1.2% 1.6% 2.9% 10.5% 16.9% 32.0% 34.9%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
60%
70%
80%
90%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 83.7% 82.9% 85.2% 70.6% 79.8%
Mean 6.02 5.97 6.11 5.23 5.79
FACTOR 3 // Satisfaction: Course Lecture and Interaction // Q045
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 3 // 14©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factors, a composite of scaled questions that explain a larger concept, are utilized in Skyfactor Benchworks’ reporting to reduce complexity andstrengthen the analysis. Skyfactor provides an in-depth analysis of the factor, Facilities and Administration, in this section of reports.
You are likely referencing this section to better understand this factor due to: 1) this factor is a high predictor; 2) this factor is performing below adesired level; 3) this factor is of special interest to your institution; or 4) this factor is an indicator. Through this analysis (i.e., currentperformance, external benchmark comparisons, and longitudinal trends), a thorough picture of the factor should emerge, however additionalinformation can be found in Skyfactor Benchworks’ Online Reports.
If improving this factor is a goal for your institution, actions should be targeted toward the factor’s scaled questions (see list below) which aremore tangible and more directly actionable. Analysis for these scaled questions is provided in this section allowing for sufficient understanding;additional information can be found in Skyfactor Benchworks’ Online Reports.
FACTOR COMPOSITION
Facilities and Administration // Regarding the school of nursing, how satisfied are you with the:
Q056 // Medical computer technology
Q057 // Training to use medical computer technology
Q058 // Responsiveness of the program administration to student concerns
Q059 // Tuition/fee level of the program
Q060 // Program course schedule
Q061 // Career placement
Q062 // Financial aid
FACTOR 4 // Satisfaction: Facilities and Administration
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 4 // 1©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
There are many pieces of analysis that, when combined, create a comprehensive picture of your institution’s performance for this factor. The firstanalysis to examine is the current performance of the factor. This information, coupled with understanding of individual population perceptions,external benchmarks, longitudinal trends, individual scaled question performance, and other institutional information or assessment is invaluableto constructing an effective Action Plan for improvement.
Factor Performance // AggregateBelow is your institution's current performance for Facilities and Administration and its scaled questions. While this factor might be difficult toimprove directly, improving its scaled questions will likely be easier and will result in an improvement in the factor.
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 4 // Satisfaction: Facilities and Administration 59 4.44 1.19 57.3%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR QUESTION PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Q060 // Program course schedule 59 4.93 1.40 65.5%
Q062 // Financial aid 54 4.78 1.56 63.0%
Q058 // Responsiveness of the program administration to student concerns 57 4.53 1.73 58.8%
Q061 // Career placement 50 4.14 1.61 52.3%
Q057 // Training to use medical computer technology 52 4.10 1.44 51.7%
Q059 // Tuition/fee level of the program 58 4.09 1.76 51.5%
Q056 // Medical computer technology 53 4.04 1.61 50.7%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 4 // Satisfaction: Facilities and Administration
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 4 // 2©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factor Performance // Key PopulationsKey categorical questions have been selected and are reported below. Answer options within each categorical question are divided into twogroups in order to facilitate a statistical testing of means; a designates the population which is statistically higher than the other population, a
designates the population that is statistically lower and an indicates that the populations have statistically equal factor means. Relativepopulation size (% Total) and Performance values for each group are plotted. To review this factor reported by all categorical questions and for allanswer options, please refer to the Online Reporting.
If this factor is included in your Action Plan, consider the behavior of these populations to determine if targeted interventions are needed.
WHAT IS YOUR GENDER?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
Female 51 4.50 1.18 58.3%
52 86.7% Male 8 4.09 1.16 51.5%
8 13.3% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
RACE/ETHNICITY (REPORTING ONLY)
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
White 57 4.41 1.19 56.8%
57 95% All others N/A 2 NR NR NR NR
3 5% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
HOW MANY YEARS OF FULL-TIME HEALTH RELATED WORK EXPERIENCE DID YOU HAVE PRIOR TO ENTERING THIS PROGRAM?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
One or more years of work experience 26 4.84 1.18 64.0%
27 45% Less than one year of work experience 33 4.13 1.10 52.2%
33 55% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
WHAT IS YOUR CUMULATIVE GPA?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
3.00 GPA and higher 52 4.49 1.21 58.2%
53 89.8% Below 3.00 GPA 6 3.81 0.73 46.8%
6 10.2% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 4 // Satisfaction: Facilities and Administration
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 4 // 3©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
WHAT WAS YOUR SAT MATH+VERBAL OR ACT COMPOSITE SCORE? (HIGHEST SCORE IF YOU TOOK MULTIPLE TESTS)
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
SAT 1240 / ACT 27 and below 17 4.24 1.26 54.0%
17 70.8% SAT 1241 / ACT 28 and higher 7 4.12 1.25 52.0%
7 29.2% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 4 // Satisfaction: Facilities and Administration
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 4 // 4©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factor Performance // Degree ProgramIn this report, the institutional mean and a breakdown by Degree Program is provided. If this factor is included in your Action Plan, identify thepopulations reporting more positive experiences in order to examine if there are best practices that can be applied to populations reporting lesspositive experiences.
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 4 // Satisfaction: Facilities and Administration 59 4.44 1.19 57.3%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR PERFORMANCE BY DEGREE PROGRAM
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
RN-to-BSN (completed an RN) 13 5.47 1.09 74.5%
BSN, with no prior nursing experience or degree 44 4.19 1.03 53.2%
BSN, have completed other non-nursing degree(s) 2 NR NR NR NR
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 4 // Satisfaction: Facilities and Administration
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 4 // 5©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
In this report, Skyfactor Benchworks compares your institutional results to your Select 6, Carnegie Class, and all participating institutions for thefactor and its scaled questions. A designates where your institution’s mean is statistically higher than the comparative group; a designateswhere your institution’s mean is statistically lower than the comparative group; and designates where your institution’s mean is statisticallyequal to the comparative group. A ranking of your institution and the external benchmarking groups is also provided. If your institution’sperformance is below that of an external benchmarking group, use this information to motivate staff that higher performance is possible; but ifyour institutional performance is higher, celebrate!
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 59 4.44 1.19 -- -- -- -- 57.3%
Select 6 439 4.79 1.16 3.89 5.61 6/7 63.2%
Carnegie Class 752 4.95 1.29 4.00 6.54 17/23 65.8%
All Institutions 26,600 4.77 1.30 2.65 6.54 190/270 62.8%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR QUESTION PERFORMANCE
SELECT 6CARNEGIE
CLASSALL
INST. N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Q060 // Program course schedule 59 4.93 1.40 65.5%
Q062 // Financial aid 54 4.78 1.56 63.0%
Q058 // Responsiveness of the programadministration to student concerns
57 4.53 1.73 58.8%
Q061 // Career placement 50 4.14 1.61 52.3%
Q057 // Training to use medical computertechnology
52 4.10 1.44 51.7%
Q059 // Tuition/fee level of the program 58 4.09 1.76 51.5%
Q056 // Medical computer technology 53 4.04 1.61 50.7%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 4 // Facilities and Administration
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 4 // 6©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
The final analysis for the factor is its performance over time. Longitudinal trends support continuous improvement and are the key to evaluatingthe success of your institution’s action plan for this factor. If your institution’s current performance falls short of expectations, review the actionsconducted and make adjustments.
If your institution participated in two or more iterations of this assessment, a longitudinal trend is plotted. If your institution did not participatecontinuously, Skyfactor extrapolated between successive iterations. A designates years where your institution performs statistically higherthan the current year; a designates years where your program is statistically lower in performance; and a represents years that arestatistically equal to the current year.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
50%
60%
70%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 69.0% 68.1% 67.0% 55.2% 57.4%
Mean 5.14 5.09 5.02 4.31 4.44
FACTOR 4 // Satisfaction: Facilities and Administration
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 4 // 7©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q056 // Administration and Support Services // Regarding the school of nursing, how satisfied are you withthe: Medical computer technology
A summary of Q056 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 53 4.04 1.61 -- -- -- -- 50.7%
Select 6 426 5.24 1.41 4.04 6.00 7/7 70.7%
Carnegie Class 692 5.19 1.60 4.00 6.75 21/22 69.8%
All Institutions 24,074 5.16 1.56 2.71 6.75 259/266 69.3%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
VERY DISSATISFIED ------------------------------ NEUTRAL ------------------------------ VERY SATISFIED
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 11.3% 5.7% 13.2% 32.1% 18.9% 13.2% 5.7%
Select 6 2.1% 2.1% 5.6% 18.8% 22.8% 28.2% 20.4%
Carnegie Class 3.4% 4.7% 7.8% 18.5% 17.6% 23.6% 24.4%
All Institutions 3.2% 3.5% 6.8% 18.4% 19.7% 25.3% 23.0%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 75.0% 74.1% 67.6% 59.3% 50.6%
Mean 5.50 5.45 5.06 4.56 4.04
FACTOR 4 // Satisfaction: Facilities and Administration // Q056
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 4 // 8©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q057 // Administration and Support Services // Regarding the school of nursing, how satisfied are you withthe: Training to use medical computer technology
A summary of Q057 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 52 4.10 1.44 -- -- -- -- 51.7%
Select 6 422 4.99 1.49 4.10 5.86 7/7 66.5%
Carnegie Class 684 4.93 1.68 3.62 6.21 19/22 65.5%
All Institutions 23,554 4.91 1.62 2.51 6.29 242/266 65.2%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
VERY DISSATISFIED ------------------------------ NEUTRAL ------------------------------ VERY SATISFIED
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 7.7% 3.8% 15.4% 38.5% 19.2% 9.6% 5.8%
Select 6 3.3% 3.3% 6.9% 22.0% 22.7% 25.4% 16.4%
Carnegie Class 4.3% 5.8% 9.1% 21.2% 18.5% 20.4% 20.7%
All Institutions 4.0% 5.0% 8.7% 21.0% 20.0% 22.4% 18.8%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
50%
60%
70%
80%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 71.9% 72.4% 66.7% 56.5% 51.6%
Mean 5.31 5.34 5.00 4.39 4.10
FACTOR 4 // Satisfaction: Facilities and Administration // Q057
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 4 // 9©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q058 // Administration and Support Services // Regarding the school of nursing, how satisfied are you withthe: Responsiveness of the program administration to student concerns
A summary of Q058 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 57 4.53 1.73 -- -- -- -- 58.8%
Select 6 426 4.98 1.57 3.82 5.71 6/7 66.3%
Carnegie Class 734 5.11 1.72 3.78 6.50 16/22 68.5%
All Institutions 25,550 4.84 1.78 2.62 6.50 182/268 64.0%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
VERY DISSATISFIED ------------------------------ NEUTRAL ------------------------------ VERY SATISFIED
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 10.5% 3.5% 7.0% 22.8% 28.1% 14.0% 14.0%
Select 6 3.1% 5.4% 9.2% 16.7% 20.9% 27.9% 16.9%
Carnegie Class 5.2% 4.7% 8.3% 15.7% 17.7% 23.3% 25.2%
All Institutions 6.9% 5.8% 8.7% 17.2% 18.5% 22.3% 20.5%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 72.3% 67.5% 65.7% 47.2% 58.8%
Mean 5.34 5.05 4.94 3.83 4.53
FACTOR 4 // Satisfaction: Facilities and Administration // Q058
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 4 // 10©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q059 // Administration and Support Services // Regarding the school of nursing, how satisfied are you withthe: Tuition/fee level of the program
A summary of Q059 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 58 4.09 1.76 -- -- -- -- 51.5%
Select 6 434 3.91 1.69 2.73 5.00 5/7 48.5%
Carnegie Class 747 4.39 1.83 2.88 6.79 13/23 56.5%
All Institutions 25,906 4.09 1.81 1.77 6.79 134/268 51.5%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
VERY DISSATISFIED ------------------------------ NEUTRAL ------------------------------ VERY SATISFIED
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 8.6% 12.1% 17.2% 20.7% 19.0% 10.3% 12.1%
Select 6 10.4% 12.2% 16.6% 23.3% 18.2% 12.7% 6.7%
Carnegie Class 9.4% 7.7% 12.8% 23.6% 15.3% 15.3% 15.9%
All Institutions 11.3% 9.8% 15.0% 23.1% 15.5% 13.8% 11.4%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
50%
60%
70%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 67.4% 64.9% 61.3% 56.7% 51.4%
Mean 5.04 4.89 4.68 4.40 4.09
FACTOR 4 // Satisfaction: Facilities and Administration // Q059
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 4 // 11©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q060 // Administration and Support Services // Regarding the school of nursing, how satisfied are you withthe: Program course schedule
A summary of Q060 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 59 4.93 1.40 -- -- -- -- 65.5%
Select 6 431 5.01 1.41 4.21 6.29 6/7 66.8%
Carnegie Class 744 5.35 1.45 3.98 6.57 18/23 72.5%
All Institutions 26,328 5.07 1.53 3.42 6.86 166/269 67.8%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
VERY DISSATISFIED ------------------------------ NEUTRAL ------------------------------ VERY SATISFIED
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 0.0% 3.4% 10.2% 32.2% 16.9% 18.6% 18.6%
Select 6 1.9% 3.2% 9.7% 17.9% 26.2% 26.9% 14.2%
Carnegie Class 1.9% 2.0% 7.5% 16.6% 20.3% 26.5% 25.3%
All Institutions 2.9% 3.6% 8.3% 18.3% 22.2% 24.9% 19.8%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
60%
70%
80%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 73.0% 71.1% 77.5% 62.7% 65.5%
Mean 5.38 5.26 5.65 4.76 4.93
FACTOR 4 // Satisfaction: Facilities and Administration // Q060
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 4 // 12©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q061 // Administration and Support Services // Regarding the school of nursing, how satisfied are you withthe: Career placement
A summary of Q061 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 50 4.14 1.61 -- -- -- -- 52.3%
Select 6 401 4.88 1.68 3.72 5.32 5/6 64.7%
Carnegie Class 607 4.77 1.75 3.43 6.71 16/20 62.8%
All Institutions 21,541 4.57 1.80 2.11 6.71 191/261 59.5%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
VERY DISSATISFIED ------------------------------ NEUTRAL ------------------------------ VERY SATISFIED
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 8.0% 10.0% 6.0% 42.0% 14.0% 10.0% 10.0%
Select 6 4.7% 6.5% 6.2% 23.7% 16.2% 23.2% 19.5%
Carnegie Class 6.1% 6.5% 8.2% 26.5% 13.9% 18.9% 19.9%
All Institutions 8.4% 6.6% 8.9% 25.1% 15.4% 18.5% 17.1%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
40%
50%
60%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 44.7% 57.8% 55.2% 43.0% 52.3%
Mean 3.68 4.47 4.31 3.58 4.14
FACTOR 4 // Satisfaction: Facilities and Administration // Q061
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 4 // 13©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q062 // Administration and Support Services // Regarding the school of nursing, how satisfied are you withthe: Financial aid
A summary of Q062 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 54 4.78 1.56 -- -- -- -- 63.0%
Select 6 392 4.48 1.64 3.69 5.01 2/6 58.0%
Carnegie Class 669 4.78 1.83 3.71 6.85 11/21 63.0%
All Institutions 22,585 4.58 1.80 2.62 6.85 104/267 59.7%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
VERY DISSATISFIED ------------------------------ NEUTRAL ------------------------------ VERY SATISFIED
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 3.7% 7.4% 3.7% 29.6% 16.7% 25.9% 13.0%
Select 6 6.4% 6.1% 10.5% 29.6% 18.4% 15.8% 13.3%
Carnegie Class 7.3% 5.5% 9.1% 21.4% 15.2% 18.9% 22.4%
All Institutions 8.1% 6.8% 9.5% 24.3% 15.6% 17.7% 18.0%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
50%
60%
70%
80%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 69.8% 68.6% 65.6% 56.9% 63.0%
Mean 5.19 5.12 4.94 4.41 4.78
FACTOR 4 // Satisfaction: Facilities and Administration // Q062
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 4 // 14©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factors, a composite of scaled questions that explain a larger concept, are utilized in Skyfactor Benchworks’ reporting to reduce complexity andstrengthen the analysis. Skyfactor provides an in-depth analysis of the factor, Classmates, in this section of reports.
You are likely referencing this section to better understand this factor due to: 1) this factor is a high predictor; 2) this factor is performing below adesired level; 3) this factor is of special interest to your institution; or 4) this factor is an indicator. Through this analysis (i.e., currentperformance, external benchmark comparisons, and longitudinal trends), a thorough picture of the factor should emerge, however additionalinformation can be found in Skyfactor Benchworks’ Online Reports.
If improving this factor is a goal for your institution, actions should be targeted toward the factor’s scaled questions (see list below) which aremore tangible and more directly actionable. Analysis for these scaled questions is provided in this section allowing for sufficient understanding;additional information can be found in Skyfactor Benchworks’ Online Reports.
FACTOR COMPOSITION
Classmates // Regarding your fellow students how satisfied were you with their:
Q050 // Academic ability
Q051 // Ability to work in study groups
Q052 // Level of camaraderie
Q053 // Academic integrity
FACTOR 5 // Satisfaction: Classmates
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 5 // 1©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
There are many pieces of analysis that, when combined, create a comprehensive picture of your institution’s performance for this factor. The firstanalysis to examine is the current performance of the factor. This information, coupled with understanding of individual population perceptions,external benchmarks, longitudinal trends, individual scaled question performance, and other institutional information or assessment is invaluableto constructing an effective Action Plan for improvement.
Factor Performance // AggregateBelow is your institution's current performance for Classmates and its scaled questions. While this factor might be difficult to improve directly,improving its scaled questions will likely be easier and will result in an improvement in the factor.
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 5 // Satisfaction: Classmates 59 5.20 1.20 70.0%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR QUESTION PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Q050 // Academic ability 59 5.54 1.18 75.7%
Q053 // Academic integrity 59 5.19 1.48 69.8%
Q052 // Level of camaraderie 59 5.12 1.53 68.7%
Q051 // Ability to work in study groups 58 4.95 1.62 65.8%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 5 // Satisfaction: Classmates
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 5 // 2©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factor Performance // Key PopulationsKey categorical questions have been selected and are reported below. Answer options within each categorical question are divided into twogroups in order to facilitate a statistical testing of means; a designates the population which is statistically higher than the other population, a
designates the population that is statistically lower and an indicates that the populations have statistically equal factor means. Relativepopulation size (% Total) and Performance values for each group are plotted. To review this factor reported by all categorical questions and for allanswer options, please refer to the Online Reporting.
If this factor is included in your Action Plan, consider the behavior of these populations to determine if targeted interventions are needed.
WHAT IS YOUR GENDER?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
Female 51 5.29 1.21 71.5%
52 86.7% Male 8 4.62 0.94 60.3%
8 13.3% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
RACE/ETHNICITY (REPORTING ONLY)
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
White 57 5.15 1.19 69.2%
57 95% All others N/A 2 NR NR NR NR
3 5% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
HOW MANY YEARS OF FULL-TIME HEALTH RELATED WORK EXPERIENCE DID YOU HAVE PRIOR TO ENTERING THIS PROGRAM?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
One or more years of work experience 26 5.38 1.26 73.0%
27 45% Less than one year of work experience 33 5.06 1.13 67.7%
33 55% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
WHAT IS YOUR CUMULATIVE GPA?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
3.00 GPA and higher 52 5.23 1.22 70.5%
53 89.8% Below 3.00 GPA 6 4.83 0.96 63.8%
6 10.2% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 5 // Satisfaction: Classmates
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 5 // 3©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
WHAT WAS YOUR SAT MATH+VERBAL OR ACT COMPOSITE SCORE? (HIGHEST SCORE IF YOU TOOK MULTIPLE TESTS)
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
SAT 1240 / ACT 27 and below 17 4.78 1.06 63.0%
17 70.8% SAT 1241 / ACT 28 and higher 7 4.14 1.26 52.3%
7 29.2% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 5 // Satisfaction: Classmates
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 5 // 4©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factor Performance // Degree ProgramIn this report, the institutional mean and a breakdown by Degree Program is provided. If this factor is included in your Action Plan, identify thepopulations reporting more positive experiences in order to examine if there are best practices that can be applied to populations reporting lesspositive experiences.
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 5 // Satisfaction: Classmates 59 5.20 1.20 70.0%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR PERFORMANCE BY DEGREE PROGRAM
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
RN-to-BSN (completed an RN) 13 5.85 1.09 80.8%
BSN, with no prior nursing experience or degree 44 5.00 1.19 66.7%
BSN, have completed other non-nursing degree(s) 2 NR NR NR NR
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 5 // Satisfaction: Classmates
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 5 // 5©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
In this report, Skyfactor Benchworks compares your institutional results to your Select 6, Carnegie Class, and all participating institutions for thefactor and its scaled questions. A designates where your institution’s mean is statistically higher than the comparative group; a designateswhere your institution’s mean is statistically lower than the comparative group; and designates where your institution’s mean is statisticallyequal to the comparative group. A ranking of your institution and the external benchmarking groups is also provided. If your institution’sperformance is below that of an external benchmarking group, use this information to motivate staff that higher performance is possible; but ifyour institutional performance is higher, celebrate!
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 59 5.20 1.20 -- -- -- -- 70.0%
Select 6 440 5.61 1.10 5.20 6.14 7/7 76.8%
Carnegie Class 747 5.61 1.22 4.50 6.71 19/23 76.8%
All Institutions 26,170 5.51 1.21 4.27 6.71 223/269 75.2%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR QUESTION PERFORMANCE
SELECT 6CARNEGIE
CLASSALL
INST. N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Q050 // Academic ability 59 5.54 1.18 75.7%
Q053 // Academic integrity 59 5.19 1.48 69.8%
Q052 // Level of camaraderie 59 5.12 1.53 68.7%
Q051 // Ability to work in study groups 58 4.95 1.62 65.8%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 5 // Classmates
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 5 // 6©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
The final analysis for the factor is its performance over time. Longitudinal trends support continuous improvement and are the key to evaluatingthe success of your institution’s action plan for this factor. If your institution’s current performance falls short of expectations, review the actionsconducted and make adjustments.
If your institution participated in two or more iterations of this assessment, a longitudinal trend is plotted. If your institution did not participatecontinuously, Skyfactor extrapolated between successive iterations. A designates years where your institution performs statistically higherthan the current year; a designates years where your program is statistically lower in performance; and a represents years that arestatistically equal to the current year.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
60%
70%
80%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 73.6% 73.3% 72.0% 63.5% 70.1%
Mean 5.42 5.40 5.32 4.81 5.20
FACTOR 5 // Satisfaction: Classmates
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 5 // 7©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q050 // Academic Peers // Regarding your fellow students how satisfied were you with their: Academicability
A summary of Q050 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 59 5.54 1.18 -- -- -- -- 75.7%
Select 6 437 5.76 1.12 5.37 6.14 6/7 79.3%
Carnegie Class 742 5.77 1.18 4.88 6.75 18/23 79.5%
All Institutions 25,992 5.65 1.25 4.40 6.75 181/269 77.5%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
VERY DISSATISFIED ------------------------------ NEUTRAL ------------------------------ VERY SATISFIED
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 0.0% 0.0% 5.1% 15.3% 27.1% 25.4% 27.1%
Select 6 0.2% 0.9% 1.8% 10.8% 21.5% 35.5% 29.3%
Carnegie Class 0.5% 0.5% 2.5% 12.5% 19.6% 32.1% 32.3%
All Institutions 0.8% 1.1% 3.0% 13.5% 19.7% 32.7% 29.2%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
60%
70%
80%
90%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 76.7% 79.7% 74.3% 65.7% 75.7%
Mean 5.60 5.78 5.46 4.94 5.54
FACTOR 5 // Satisfaction: Classmates // Q050
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 5 // 8©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q051 // Academic Peers // Regarding your fellow students how satisfied were you with their: Ability to workin study groups
A summary of Q051 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 58 4.95 1.62 -- -- -- -- 65.8%
Select 6 427 5.36 1.39 4.88 6.00 6/7 72.7%
Carnegie Class 719 5.33 1.53 3.75 6.57 18/22 72.2%
All Institutions 25,161 5.25 1.50 3.25 6.57 223/268 70.8%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
VERY DISSATISFIED ------------------------------ NEUTRAL ------------------------------ VERY SATISFIED
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 6.9% 0.0% 10.3% 13.8% 32.8% 15.5% 20.7%
Select 6 0.9% 2.8% 7.3% 13.3% 23.9% 27.4% 24.4%
Carnegie Class 3.1% 2.7% 6.8% 14.7% 19.6% 27.4% 25.7%
All Institutions 2.6% 3.1% 6.6% 15.7% 21.4% 27.5% 23.1%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
50%
60%
70%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 68.4% 65.3% 68.1% 58.2% 65.8%
Mean 5.11 4.92 5.09 4.49 4.95
FACTOR 5 // Satisfaction: Classmates // Q051
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 5 // 9©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q052 // Academic Peers // Regarding your fellow students how satisfied were you with their: Level ofcamaraderie
A summary of Q052 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 59 5.12 1.53 -- -- -- -- 68.7%
Select 6 437 5.61 1.37 5.12 6.14 7/7 76.8%
Carnegie Class 736 5.55 1.55 4.38 6.79 17/23 75.8%
All Institutions 25,788 5.53 1.44 4.38 6.79 235/269 75.5%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
VERY DISSATISFIED ------------------------------ NEUTRAL ------------------------------ VERY SATISFIED
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 3.4% 0.0% 8.5% 27.1% 16.9% 18.6% 25.4%
Select 6 1.6% 1.6% 3.2% 14.2% 18.5% 28.6% 32.3%
Carnegie Class 2.3% 3.1% 4.9% 15.3% 15.0% 23.0% 36.4%
All Institutions 1.8% 2.3% 4.6% 14.4% 18.0% 27.6% 31.3%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
60%
70%
80%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 72.9% 77.0% 71.3% 64.9% 68.6%
Mean 5.38 5.62 5.28 4.90 5.12
FACTOR 5 // Satisfaction: Classmates // Q052
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 5 // 10©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q053 // Academic Peers // Regarding your fellow students how satisfied were you with their: Academicintegrity
A summary of Q053 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 59 5.19 1.48 -- -- -- -- 69.8%
Select 6 437 5.72 1.33 5.19 6.29 7/7 78.7%
Carnegie Class 738 5.77 1.40 4.38 6.79 19/23 79.5%
All Institutions 25,831 5.60 1.43 3.95 6.79 223/269 76.7%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
VERY DISSATISFIED ------------------------------ NEUTRAL ------------------------------ VERY SATISFIED
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 3.4% 1.7% 5.1% 22.0% 18.6% 28.8% 20.3%
Select 6 1.1% 2.1% 3.2% 11.0% 16.7% 32.0% 33.9%
Carnegie Class 2.0% 1.6% 3.3% 12.2% 14.8% 28.1% 38.0%
All Institutions 2.0% 2.1% 4.2% 12.8% 16.7% 29.7% 32.6%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
60%
70%
80%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 76.7% 73.9% 73.1% 65.4% 69.8%
Mean 5.60 5.43 5.39 4.93 5.19
FACTOR 5 // Satisfaction: Classmates // Q053
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 5 // 11©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factors, a composite of scaled questions that explain a larger concept, are utilized in Skyfactor Benchworks’ reporting to reduce complexity andstrengthen the analysis. Skyfactor provides an in-depth analysis of the factor, Advisor, in this section of reports.
You are likely referencing this section to better understand this factor due to: 1) this factor is a high predictor; 2) this factor is performing below adesired level; 3) this factor is of special interest to your institution; or 4) this factor is an indicator. Through this analysis (i.e., currentperformance, external benchmark comparisons, and longitudinal trends), a thorough picture of the factor should emerge, however additionalinformation can be found in Skyfactor Benchworks’ Online Reports.
If improving this factor is a goal for your institution, actions should be targeted toward the factor’s scaled questions (see list below) which aremore tangible and more directly actionable. Analysis for these scaled questions is provided in this section allowing for sufficient understanding;additional information can be found in Skyfactor Benchworks’ Online Reports.
FACTOR COMPOSITION
Advisor // To what degree was your academic advisor knowledgeable about:
Q063 // Course requirements for major
Q064 // Degree requirements
Q065 // Campus resources for personal, academic, or financial problems
FACTOR 6 // Satisfaction: Advisor
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 6 // 1©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
There are many pieces of analysis that, when combined, create a comprehensive picture of your institution’s performance for this factor. The firstanalysis to examine is the current performance of the factor. This information, coupled with understanding of individual population perceptions,external benchmarks, longitudinal trends, individual scaled question performance, and other institutional information or assessment is invaluableto constructing an effective Action Plan for improvement.
Factor Performance // AggregateBelow is your institution's current performance for Advisor and its scaled questions. While this factor might be difficult to improve directly,improving its scaled questions will likely be easier and will result in an improvement in the factor.
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 6 // Satisfaction: Advisor 59 5.64 1.40 77.3%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR QUESTION PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Q064 // Degree requirements 59 5.88 1.32 81.3%
Q063 // Course requirements for major 59 5.76 1.39 79.3%
Q065 // Campus resources for personal, academic, or financial problems 58 5.26 1.80 71.0%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 6 // Satisfaction: Advisor
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 6 // 2©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factor Performance // Key PopulationsKey categorical questions have been selected and are reported below. Answer options within each categorical question are divided into twogroups in order to facilitate a statistical testing of means; a designates the population which is statistically higher than the other population, a
designates the population that is statistically lower and an indicates that the populations have statistically equal factor means. Relativepopulation size (% Total) and Performance values for each group are plotted. To review this factor reported by all categorical questions and for allanswer options, please refer to the Online Reporting.
If this factor is included in your Action Plan, consider the behavior of these populations to determine if targeted interventions are needed.
WHAT IS YOUR GENDER?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
Male 8 5.79 1.31 79.8%
8 13.3% Female 51 5.61 1.41 76.8%
52 86.7% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
RACE/ETHNICITY (REPORTING ONLY)
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
White 57 5.61 1.41 76.8%
57 95% All others N/A 2 NR NR NR NR
3 5% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
HOW MANY YEARS OF FULL-TIME HEALTH RELATED WORK EXPERIENCE DID YOU HAVE PRIOR TO ENTERING THIS PROGRAM?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
One or more years of work experience 26 5.88 1.18 81.3%
27 45% Less than one year of work experience 33 5.44 1.52 74.0%
33 55% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
WHAT IS YOUR CUMULATIVE GPA?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
3.00 GPA and higher 52 5.76 1.24 79.3%
53 89.8% Below 3.00 GPA 6 4.50 2.10 58.3%
6 10.2% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 6 // Satisfaction: Advisor
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 6 // 3©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
WHAT WAS YOUR SAT MATH+VERBAL OR ACT COMPOSITE SCORE? (HIGHEST SCORE IF YOU TOOK MULTIPLE TESTS)
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
SAT 1240 / ACT 27 and below 17 5.67 1.16 77.8%
17 70.8% SAT 1241 / ACT 28 and higher 7 5.19 1.33 69.8%
7 29.2% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 6 // Satisfaction: Advisor
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 6 // 4©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factor Performance // Degree ProgramIn this report, the institutional mean and a breakdown by Degree Program is provided. If this factor is included in your Action Plan, identify thepopulations reporting more positive experiences in order to examine if there are best practices that can be applied to populations reporting lesspositive experiences.
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 6 // Satisfaction: Advisor 59 5.64 1.40 77.3%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR PERFORMANCE BY DEGREE PROGRAM
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
RN-to-BSN (completed an RN) 13 6.21 0.89 86.8%
BSN, with no prior nursing experience or degree 44 5.48 1.50 74.7%
BSN, have completed other non-nursing degree(s) 2 NR NR NR NR
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 6 // Satisfaction: Advisor
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 6 // 5©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
In this report, Skyfactor Benchworks compares your institutional results to your Select 6, Carnegie Class, and all participating institutions for thefactor and its scaled questions. A designates where your institution’s mean is statistically higher than the comparative group; a designateswhere your institution’s mean is statistically lower than the comparative group; and designates where your institution’s mean is statisticallyequal to the comparative group. A ranking of your institution and the external benchmarking groups is also provided. If your institution’sperformance is below that of an external benchmarking group, use this information to motivate staff that higher performance is possible; but ifyour institutional performance is higher, celebrate!
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 59 5.64 1.40 -- -- -- -- 77.3%
Select 6 435 5.76 1.39 5.44 6.19 5/7 79.3%
Carnegie Class 637 5.76 1.36 4.76 6.79 15/21 79.3%
All Institutions 24,349 5.59 1.49 3.98 7.00 127/258 76.5%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR QUESTION PERFORMANCE
SELECT 6CARNEGIE
CLASSALL
INST. N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Q064 // Degree requirements 59 5.88 1.32 81.3%
Q063 // Course requirements for major 59 5.76 1.39 79.3%
Q065 // Campus resources for personal,academic, or financial problems
58 5.26 1.80 71.0%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 6 // Advisor
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 6 // 6©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
The final analysis for the factor is its performance over time. Longitudinal trends support continuous improvement and are the key to evaluatingthe success of your institution’s action plan for this factor. If your institution’s current performance falls short of expectations, review the actionsconducted and make adjustments.
If your institution participated in two or more iterations of this assessment, a longitudinal trend is plotted. If your institution did not participatecontinuously, Skyfactor extrapolated between successive iterations. A designates years where your institution performs statistically higherthan the current year; a designates years where your program is statistically lower in performance; and a represents years that arestatistically equal to the current year.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
60%
70%
80%
2014 2015
Performance 68.6% 77.3%
Mean 5.12 5.64
FACTOR 6 // Satisfaction: Advisor
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 6 // 7©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q063 // Academic Advising // To what degree was your academic advisor knowledgeable about: Courserequirements for major
A summary of Q063 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 59 5.76 1.39 -- -- -- -- 79.3%
Select 6 434 5.87 1.45 5.65 6.29 5/7 81.2%
Carnegie Class 633 5.89 1.42 4.86 6.79 16/21 81.5%
All Institutions 24,062 5.69 1.54 3.95 7.00 131/258 78.2%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 18.6% 3.4% 35.6% 37.3%
Select 6 2.1% 2.3% 3.7% 8.1% 12.0% 25.8% 46.1%
Carnegie Class 1.9% 2.2% 2.2% 10.8% 12.1% 24.6% 46.2%
All Institutions 2.9% 2.6% 3.5% 12.1% 13.3% 24.3% 41.4%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
60%
70%
80%
2014 2015
Performance 69.9% 79.4%
Mean 5.19 5.76
FACTOR 6 // Satisfaction: Advisor // Q063
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 6 // 8©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q064 // Academic Advising // To what degree was your academic advisor knowledgeable about: Degreerequirements
A summary of Q064 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 59 5.88 1.32 -- -- -- -- 81.3%
Select 6 432 5.85 1.44 5.61 6.29 4/7 80.8%
Carnegie Class 636 5.88 1.39 4.67 6.79 13/21 81.3%
All Institutions 24,033 5.73 1.51 4.19 7.00 106/258 78.8%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 0.0% 3.4% 1.7% 15.3% 3.4% 35.6% 40.7%
Select 6 1.9% 2.8% 3.5% 7.9% 12.3% 28.0% 43.8%
Carnegie Class 1.6% 2.2% 2.0% 10.6% 12.9% 25.8% 44.9%
All Institutions 2.7% 2.4% 3.3% 11.8% 13.2% 24.8% 42.0%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
70%
80%
90%
2014 2015
Performance 72.1% 81.4%
Mean 5.32 5.88
FACTOR 6 // Satisfaction: Advisor // Q064
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 6 // 9©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q065 // Academic Advising // To what degree was your academic advisor knowledgeable about: Campusresources for personal, academic, or financial problems
A summary of Q065 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 58 5.26 1.80 -- -- -- -- 71.0%
Select 6 407 5.52 1.57 4.92 6.00 6/7 75.3%
Carnegie Class 598 5.48 1.57 4.43 6.85 15/21 74.7%
All Institutions 22,449 5.31 1.69 3.35 7.00 145/257 71.8%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 3.4% 10.3% 1.7% 17.2% 8.6% 25.9% 32.8%
Select 6 2.7% 3.4% 5.9% 10.3% 17.2% 25.3% 35.1%
Carnegie Class 3.2% 3.5% 4.0% 15.7% 14.9% 24.2% 34.5%
All Institutions 4.7% 3.5% 5.3% 16.8% 14.7% 23.0% 32.0%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
60%
70%
80%
2014 2015
Performance 63.9% 71.0%
Mean 4.84 5.26
FACTOR 6 // Satisfaction: Advisor // Q065
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 6 // 10©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factors, a composite of scaled questions that explain a larger concept, are utilized in Skyfactor Benchworks’ reporting to reduce complexity andstrengthen the analysis. Skyfactor provides an in-depth analysis of the factor, Professional Values, in this section of reports.
You are likely referencing this section to better understand this factor due to: 1) this factor is a high predictor; 2) this factor is performing below adesired level; 3) this factor is of special interest to your institution; or 4) this factor is an indicator. Through this analysis (i.e., currentperformance, external benchmark comparisons, and longitudinal trends), a thorough picture of the factor should emerge, however additionalinformation can be found in Skyfactor Benchworks’ Online Reports.
If improving this factor is a goal for your institution, actions should be targeted toward the factor’s scaled questions (see list below) which aremore tangible and more directly actionable. Analysis for these scaled questions is provided in this section allowing for sufficient understanding;additional information can be found in Skyfactor Benchworks’ Online Reports.
FACTOR COMPOSITION
Professional Values // To what degree did the nursing program teach you to:
Q079 // Provide culturally competent care
Q080 // Support fairness in the delivery of care
Q082 // Act as an advocate for vulnerable patients
Q083 // Demonstrate accountability for your own actions
Q084 // Honor the right of patients to make decisions about their health care
FACTOR 7 // Learning: Professional Values
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 7 // 1©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
There are many pieces of analysis that, when combined, create a comprehensive picture of your institution’s performance for this factor. The firstanalysis to examine is the current performance of the factor. This information, coupled with understanding of individual population perceptions,external benchmarks, longitudinal trends, individual scaled question performance, and other institutional information or assessment is invaluableto constructing an effective Action Plan for improvement.
Factor Performance // AggregateBelow is your institution's current performance for Professional Values and its scaled questions. While this factor might be difficult to improvedirectly, improving its scaled questions will likely be easier and will result in an improvement in the factor.
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 7 // Learning: Professional Values 57 5.88 0.96 81.3%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR QUESTION PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Q084 // Honor the right of patients to make decisions about their health care 57 6.19 1.07 86.5%
Q083 // Demonstrate accountability for your own actions 57 5.98 1.08 83.0%
Q082 // Act as an advocate for vulnerable patients 56 5.91 1.12 81.8%
Q080 // Support fairness in the delivery of care 57 5.74 1.00 79.0%
Q079 // Provide culturally competent care 55 5.56 1.22 76.0%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 7 // Learning: Professional Values
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 7 // 2©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factor Performance // Key PopulationsKey categorical questions have been selected and are reported below. Answer options within each categorical question are divided into twogroups in order to facilitate a statistical testing of means; a designates the population which is statistically higher than the other population, a
designates the population that is statistically lower and an indicates that the populations have statistically equal factor means. Relativepopulation size (% Total) and Performance values for each group are plotted. To review this factor reported by all categorical questions and for allanswer options, please refer to the Online Reporting.
If this factor is included in your Action Plan, consider the behavior of these populations to determine if targeted interventions are needed.
WHAT IS YOUR GENDER?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
Female 50 5.91 1.01 81.8%
52 86.7% Male 7 5.69 0.51 78.2%
8 13.3% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
RACE/ETHNICITY (REPORTING ONLY)
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
White 55 5.85 0.96 80.8%
57 95% All others N/A 2 NR NR NR NR
3 5% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
HOW MANY YEARS OF FULL-TIME HEALTH RELATED WORK EXPERIENCE DID YOU HAVE PRIOR TO ENTERING THIS PROGRAM?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
One or more years of work experience 26 5.94 0.98 82.3%
27 45% Less than one year of work experience 31 5.84 0.94 80.7%
33 55% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
WHAT IS YOUR CUMULATIVE GPA?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
3.00 GPA and higher 50 5.94 0.88 82.3%
53 89.8% Below 3.00 GPA 6 5.30 1.36 71.7%
6 10.2% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 7 // Learning: Professional Values
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 7 // 3©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
WHAT WAS YOUR SAT MATH+VERBAL OR ACT COMPOSITE SCORE? (HIGHEST SCORE IF YOU TOOK MULTIPLE TESTS)
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
SAT 1241 / ACT 28 and higher 6 6.00 0.98 83.3%
7 29.2% SAT 1240 / ACT 27 and below 17 5.79 0.91 79.8%
17 70.8% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 7 // Learning: Professional Values
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 7 // 4©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factor Performance // Degree ProgramIn this report, the institutional mean and a breakdown by Degree Program is provided. If this factor is included in your Action Plan, identify thepopulations reporting more positive experiences in order to examine if there are best practices that can be applied to populations reporting lesspositive experiences.
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 7 // Learning: Professional Values 57 5.88 0.96 81.3%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR PERFORMANCE BY DEGREE PROGRAM
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
RN-to-BSN (completed an RN) 13 5.88 1.09 81.3%
BSN, with no prior nursing experience or degree 42 5.84 0.92 80.7%
BSN, have completed other non-nursing degree(s) 2 NR NR NR NR
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 7 // Learning: Professional Values
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 7 // 5©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
In this report, Skyfactor Benchworks compares your institutional results to your Select 6, Carnegie Class, and all participating institutions for thefactor and its scaled questions. A designates where your institution’s mean is statistically higher than the comparative group; a designateswhere your institution’s mean is statistically lower than the comparative group; and designates where your institution’s mean is statisticallyequal to the comparative group. A ranking of your institution and the external benchmarking groups is also provided. If your institution’sperformance is below that of an external benchmarking group, use this information to motivate staff that higher performance is possible; but ifyour institutional performance is higher, celebrate!
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 57 5.88 0.96 -- -- -- -- 81.3%
Select 6 437 6.04 0.90 5.88 6.33 6/7 84.0%
Carnegie Class 815 6.08 1.01 5.55 6.90 18/24 84.7%
All Institutions 26,068 6.00 1.02 4.90 6.95 187/271 83.3%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR QUESTION PERFORMANCE
SELECT 6CARNEGIE
CLASSALL
INST. N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Q084 // Honor the right of patients to makedecisions about their health care
57 6.19 1.07 86.5%
Q083 // Demonstrate accountability for your ownactions
57 5.98 1.08 83.0%
Q082 // Act as an advocate for vulnerable patients 56 5.91 1.12 81.8%
Q080 // Support fairness in the delivery of care 57 5.74 1.00 79.0%
Q079 // Provide culturally competent care 55 5.56 1.22 76.0%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 7 // Professional Values
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 7 // 6©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
The final analysis for the factor is its performance over time. Longitudinal trends support continuous improvement and are the key to evaluatingthe success of your institution’s action plan for this factor. If your institution’s current performance falls short of expectations, review the actionsconducted and make adjustments.
If your institution participated in two or more iterations of this assessment, a longitudinal trend is plotted. If your institution did not participatecontinuously, Skyfactor extrapolated between successive iterations. A designates years where your institution performs statistically higherthan the current year; a designates years where your program is statistically lower in performance; and a represents years that arestatistically equal to the current year.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
70%
80%
90%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 78.6% 81.1% 83.7% 77.4% 81.4%
Mean 5.71 5.87 6.02 5.65 5.88
FACTOR 7 // Learning: Professional Values
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 7 // 7©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q079 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Provide culturally competent care
A summary of Q079 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 55 5.56 1.22 -- -- -- -- 76.0%
Select 6 433 5.85 1.10 5.42 6.03 6/7 80.8%
Carnegie Class 807 5.97 1.17 5.24 6.79 21/24 82.8%
All Institutions 25,784 5.84 1.21 4.37 7.00 221/271 80.7%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 0.0% 0.0% 3.6% 21.8% 18.2% 27.3% 29.1%
Select 6 0.5% 0.7% 1.8% 8.5% 18.9% 37.9% 31.6%
Carnegie Class 0.7% 1.0% 1.6% 8.7% 15.0% 33.3% 39.7%
All Institutions 0.7% 1.1% 2.3% 10.0% 16.8% 33.9% 35.3%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
70%
80%
90%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 76.4% 81.6% 82.4% 74.0% 76.1%
Mean 5.58 5.89 5.95 5.44 5.56
FACTOR 7 // Learning: Professional Values // Q079
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 7 // 8©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q080 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Support fairness in the delivery of care
A summary of Q080 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 57 5.74 1.00 -- -- -- -- 79.0%
Select 6 435 5.89 1.10 5.68 6.17 6/7 81.5%
Carnegie Class 734 5.93 1.19 5.38 6.86 18/23 82.2%
All Institutions 25,651 5.90 1.15 4.71 7.00 197/268 81.7%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 0.0% 0.0% 1.8% 12.3% 19.3% 43.9% 22.8%
Select 6 0.5% 0.7% 2.1% 9.0% 14.0% 41.6% 32.2%
Carnegie Class 0.5% 1.3% 1.8% 9.5% 14.5% 34.5% 37.9%
All Institutions 0.6% 0.9% 1.8% 9.6% 15.5% 35.6% 36.1%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
70%
80%
90%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 77.0% 82.0% 81.1% 75.4% 78.9%
Mean 5.62 5.92 5.86 5.52 5.74
FACTOR 7 // Learning: Professional Values // Q080
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 7 // 9©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q082 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Act as an advocate for vulnerable patients
A summary of Q082 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 56 5.91 1.12 -- -- -- -- 81.8%
Select 6 432 6.09 1.07 5.85 6.49 6/7 84.8%
Carnegie Class 808 6.15 1.10 5.58 7.00 19/24 85.8%
All Institutions 25,793 6.03 1.12 4.89 7.00 196/271 83.8%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 0.0% 0.0% 3.6% 12.5% 8.9% 39.3% 35.7%
Select 6 0.5% 0.9% 0.9% 6.0% 13.2% 35.4% 43.1%
Carnegie Class 0.5% 0.7% 1.4% 6.6% 12.4% 29.7% 48.7%
All Institutions 0.5% 0.8% 1.5% 7.9% 13.9% 32.5% 43.0%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
70%
80%
90%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 79.5% 78.5% 82.9% 77.4% 81.8%
Mean 5.77 5.71 5.97 5.64 5.91
FACTOR 7 // Learning: Professional Values // Q082
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 7 // 10©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q083 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Demonstrate accountability for your own actions
A summary of Q083 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 57 5.98 1.08 -- -- -- -- 83.0%
Select 6 432 6.16 1.03 5.98 6.48 7/7 86.0%
Carnegie Class 807 6.13 1.13 5.44 7.00 15/24 85.5%
All Institutions 25,795 6.08 1.11 5.18 7.00 184/271 84.7%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 0.0% 0.0% 1.8% 12.3% 12.3% 33.3% 40.4%
Select 6 0.2% 1.2% 0.7% 5.1% 11.6% 36.1% 45.1%
Carnegie Class 0.6% 0.9% 1.3% 6.8% 11.8% 30.7% 47.9%
All Institutions 0.5% 0.7% 1.2% 7.5% 12.6% 32.7% 44.8%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
70%
80%
90%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 79.4% 81.6% 86.9% 80.1% 83.0%
Mean 5.77 5.89 6.22 5.80 5.98
FACTOR 7 // Learning: Professional Values // Q083
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 7 // 11©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q084 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Honor the right of patients to make decisions about their health care
A summary of Q084 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 57 6.19 1.07 -- -- -- -- 86.5%
Select 6 431 6.23 0.94 6.10 6.49 4/7 87.2%
Carnegie Class 802 6.21 1.06 5.62 7.00 14/24 86.8%
All Institutions 25,708 6.14 1.06 5.30 7.00 133/270 85.7%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 0.0% 0.0% 1.8% 10.5% 7.0% 28.1% 52.6%
Select 6 0.0% 0.7% 0.9% 4.2% 10.7% 36.2% 47.3%
Carnegie Class 0.7% 0.2% 0.7% 6.5% 11.3% 29.1% 51.5%
All Institutions 0.4% 0.5% 1.1% 7.0% 11.9% 32.5% 46.7%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
70%
80%
90%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 78.8% 82.4% 87.1% 78.7% 86.5%
Mean 5.73 5.95 6.23 5.72 6.19
FACTOR 7 // Learning: Professional Values // Q084
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 7 // 12©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factors, a composite of scaled questions that explain a larger concept, are utilized in Skyfactor Benchworks’ reporting to reduce complexity andstrengthen the analysis. Skyfactor provides an in-depth analysis of the factor, Core Competencies, in this section of reports.
You are likely referencing this section to better understand this factor due to: 1) this factor is a high predictor; 2) this factor is performing below adesired level; 3) this factor is of special interest to your institution; or 4) this factor is an indicator. Through this analysis (i.e., currentperformance, external benchmark comparisons, and longitudinal trends), a thorough picture of the factor should emerge, however additionalinformation can be found in Skyfactor Benchworks’ Online Reports.
If improving this factor is a goal for your institution, actions should be targeted toward the factor’s scaled questions (see list below) which aremore tangible and more directly actionable. Analysis for these scaled questions is provided in this section allowing for sufficient understanding;additional information can be found in Skyfactor Benchworks’ Online Reports.
FACTOR COMPOSITION
Core Competencies // To what degree did the nursing program teach you to:
Q069 // Apply research based knowledge as a basis for practice
Q071 // Make effective presentations
Q081 // Assist patients to interpret the meaning of health information
Q091 // Evaluate individual's ability to assume responsibility for self care
FACTOR 8 // Learning: Core Competencies
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 8 // 1©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
There are many pieces of analysis that, when combined, create a comprehensive picture of your institution’s performance for this factor. The firstanalysis to examine is the current performance of the factor. This information, coupled with understanding of individual population perceptions,external benchmarks, longitudinal trends, individual scaled question performance, and other institutional information or assessment is invaluableto constructing an effective Action Plan for improvement.
Factor Performance // AggregateBelow is your institution's current performance for Core Competencies and its scaled questions. While this factor might be difficult to improvedirectly, improving its scaled questions will likely be easier and will result in an improvement in the factor.
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 8 // Learning: Core Competencies 58 5.47 1.10 74.5%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR QUESTION PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Q069 // Apply research based knowledge as a basis for practice 57 5.67 1.29 77.8%
Q081 // Assist patients to interpret the meaning of health information 55 5.47 1.13 74.5%
Q091 // Evaluate individual's ability to assume responsibility for self care 56 5.43 1.19 73.8%
Q071 // Make effective presentations 56 5.38 1.37 73.0%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 8 // Learning: Core Competencies
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 8 // 2©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factor Performance // Key PopulationsKey categorical questions have been selected and are reported below. Answer options within each categorical question are divided into twogroups in order to facilitate a statistical testing of means; a designates the population which is statistically higher than the other population, a
designates the population that is statistically lower and an indicates that the populations have statistically equal factor means. Relativepopulation size (% Total) and Performance values for each group are plotted. To review this factor reported by all categorical questions and for allanswer options, please refer to the Online Reporting.
If this factor is included in your Action Plan, consider the behavior of these populations to determine if targeted interventions are needed.
WHAT IS YOUR GENDER?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
Female 51 5.47 1.16 74.5%
52 86.7% Male 7 5.46 0.41 74.3%
8 13.3% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
RACE/ETHNICITY (REPORTING ONLY)
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
White 56 5.44 1.10 74.0%
57 95% All others N/A 2 NR NR NR NR
3 5% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
HOW MANY YEARS OF FULL-TIME HEALTH RELATED WORK EXPERIENCE DID YOU HAVE PRIOR TO ENTERING THIS PROGRAM?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
One or more years of work experience 26 5.50 1.19 75.0%
27 45% Less than one year of work experience 32 5.45 1.02 74.2%
33 55% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
WHAT IS YOUR CUMULATIVE GPA?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
3.00 GPA and higher 51 5.49 1.09 74.8%
53 89.8% Below 3.00 GPA 6 5.17 1.15 69.5%
6 10.2% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 8 // Learning: Core Competencies
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 8 // 3©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
WHAT WAS YOUR SAT MATH+VERBAL OR ACT COMPOSITE SCORE? (HIGHEST SCORE IF YOU TOOK MULTIPLE TESTS)
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
SAT 1240 / ACT 27 and below 17 5.38 1.01 73.0%
17 70.8% SAT 1241 / ACT 28 and higher 6 5.25 1.13 70.8%
7 29.2% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 8 // Learning: Core Competencies
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 8 // 4©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factor Performance // Degree ProgramIn this report, the institutional mean and a breakdown by Degree Program is provided. If this factor is included in your Action Plan, identify thepopulations reporting more positive experiences in order to examine if there are best practices that can be applied to populations reporting lesspositive experiences.
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 8 // Learning: Core Competencies 58 5.47 1.10 74.5%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR PERFORMANCE BY DEGREE PROGRAM
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
BSN, with no prior nursing experience or degree 43 5.48 0.99 74.7%
RN-to-BSN (completed an RN) 13 5.42 1.46 73.7%
BSN, have completed other non-nursing degree(s) 2 NR NR NR NR
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 8 // Learning: Core Competencies
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 8 // 5©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
In this report, Skyfactor Benchworks compares your institutional results to your Select 6, Carnegie Class, and all participating institutions for thefactor and its scaled questions. A designates where your institution’s mean is statistically higher than the comparative group; a designateswhere your institution’s mean is statistically lower than the comparative group; and designates where your institution’s mean is statisticallyequal to the comparative group. A ranking of your institution and the external benchmarking groups is also provided. If your institution’sperformance is below that of an external benchmarking group, use this information to motivate staff that higher performance is possible; but ifyour institutional performance is higher, celebrate!
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 58 5.47 1.10 -- -- -- -- 74.5%
Select 6 437 5.83 0.86 5.47 6.04 7/7 80.5%
Carnegie Class 817 5.86 1.03 5.10 6.79 21/24 81.0%
All Institutions 26,160 5.73 1.04 4.49 6.94 215/271 78.8%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR QUESTION PERFORMANCE
SELECT 6CARNEGIE
CLASSALL
INST. N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Q069 // Apply research based knowledge as abasis for practice
57 5.67 1.29 77.8%
Q081 // Assist patients to interpret the meaning ofhealth information
55 5.47 1.13 74.5%
Q091 // Evaluate individual's ability to assumeresponsibility for self care
56 5.43 1.19 73.8%
Q071 // Make effective presentations 56 5.38 1.37 73.0%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 8 // Core Competencies
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 8 // 6©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
The final analysis for the factor is its performance over time. Longitudinal trends support continuous improvement and are the key to evaluatingthe success of your institution’s action plan for this factor. If your institution’s current performance falls short of expectations, review the actionsconducted and make adjustments.
If your institution participated in two or more iterations of this assessment, a longitudinal trend is plotted. If your institution did not participatecontinuously, Skyfactor extrapolated between successive iterations. A designates years where your institution performs statistically higherthan the current year; a designates years where your program is statistically lower in performance; and a represents years that arestatistically equal to the current year.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
70%
80%
90%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 79.1% 80.3% 80.4% 74.0% 74.5%
Mean 5.74 5.82 5.82 5.44 5.47
FACTOR 8 // Learning: Core Competencies
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 8 // 7©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q069 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Apply research based knowledge as a basis for practice
A summary of Q069 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 57 5.67 1.29 -- -- -- -- 77.8%
Select 6 435 6.06 0.90 5.67 6.28 7/7 84.3%
Carnegie Class 813 5.98 1.13 5.15 6.86 20/24 83.0%
All Institutions 26,011 5.86 1.17 4.50 6.86 196/271 81.0%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 0.0% 1.8% 5.3% 14.0% 14.0% 33.3% 31.6%
Select 6 0.0% 0.2% 0.5% 4.8% 18.2% 40.7% 35.6%
Carnegie Class 0.5% 0.9% 1.6% 8.6% 16.2% 32.3% 39.9%
All Institutions 0.5% 1.0% 2.2% 9.6% 17.3% 34.4% 35.1%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
70%
80%
90%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 80.2% 81.6% 82.0% 76.1% 77.8%
Mean 5.81 5.89 5.92 5.57 5.67
FACTOR 8 // Learning: Core Competencies // Q069
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 8 // 8©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q071 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Make effective presentations
A summary of Q071 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 56 5.38 1.37 -- -- -- -- 73.0%
Select 6 432 5.58 1.20 5.20 5.86 6/7 76.3%
Carnegie Class 808 5.69 1.26 4.92 6.79 19/24 78.2%
All Institutions 25,740 5.54 1.31 3.74 7.00 189/270 75.7%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 0.0% 7.1% 3.6% 8.9% 25.0% 35.7% 19.6%
Select 6 0.9% 0.5% 4.6% 10.9% 23.1% 36.8% 23.1%
Carnegie Class 0.7% 2.0% 3.0% 12.0% 18.5% 33.6% 30.2%
All Institutions 1.2% 1.6% 3.7% 13.7% 20.7% 32.9% 26.2%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
70%
80%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 78.5% 78.9% 77.9% 73.1% 72.9%
Mean 5.71 5.74 5.68 5.39 5.38
FACTOR 8 // Learning: Core Competencies // Q071
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 8 // 9©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q081 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Assist patients to interpret the meaning of health information
A summary of Q081 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 55 5.47 1.13 -- -- -- -- 74.5%
Select 6 433 5.91 1.06 5.47 6.19 7/7 81.8%
Carnegie Class 730 5.84 1.18 5.13 6.75 20/23 80.7%
All Institutions 25,600 5.79 1.18 4.70 7.00 225/269 79.8%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 0.0% 1.8% 1.8% 20.0% 14.5% 47.3% 14.5%
Select 6 0.0% 1.4% 1.8% 5.8% 18.7% 40.4% 31.9%
Carnegie Class 0.5% 1.0% 2.3% 10.7% 16.6% 35.8% 33.1%
All Institutions 0.6% 1.1% 2.3% 10.3% 17.8% 36.5% 31.5%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
70%
80%
90%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 78.1% 81.6% 80.6% 72.4% 74.5%
Mean 5.69 5.89 5.84 5.34 5.47
FACTOR 8 // Learning: Core Competencies // Q081
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 8 // 10©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q091 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Evaluate individual's ability to assume responsibility for self care
A summary of Q091 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 56 5.43 1.19 -- -- -- -- 73.8%
Select 6 425 5.80 1.07 5.43 6.03 7/7 80.0%
Carnegie Class 720 5.83 1.22 5.18 6.79 19/23 80.5%
All Institutions 25,253 5.73 1.22 4.71 7.00 220/270 78.8%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 0.0% 1.8% 5.4% 14.3% 23.2% 37.5% 17.9%
Select 6 0.2% 1.2% 1.4% 8.7% 19.5% 41.6% 27.3%
Carnegie Class 1.0% 0.8% 2.2% 10.6% 18.9% 31.3% 35.2%
All Institutions 0.8% 1.2% 2.5% 11.4% 18.2% 35.3% 30.6%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
70%
80%
90%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 79.0% 78.9% 80.9% 75.5% 73.8%
Mean 5.74 5.74 5.85 5.53 5.43
FACTOR 8 // Learning: Core Competencies // Q091
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 8 // 11©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factors, a composite of scaled questions that explain a larger concept, are utilized in Skyfactor Benchworks’ reporting to reduce complexity andstrengthen the analysis. Skyfactor provides an in-depth analysis of the factor, Technical Skills, in this section of reports.
You are likely referencing this section to better understand this factor due to: 1) this factor is a high predictor; 2) this factor is performing below adesired level; 3) this factor is of special interest to your institution; or 4) this factor is an indicator. Through this analysis (i.e., currentperformance, external benchmark comparisons, and longitudinal trends), a thorough picture of the factor should emerge, however additionalinformation can be found in Skyfactor Benchworks’ Online Reports.
If improving this factor is a goal for your institution, actions should be targeted toward the factor’s scaled questions (see list below) which aremore tangible and more directly actionable. Analysis for these scaled questions is provided in this section allowing for sufficient understanding;additional information can be found in Skyfactor Benchworks’ Online Reports.
FACTOR COMPOSITION
Technical Skills // To what degree did the nursing program teach you to:
Q087 // Provide physical support in preparation for therapeutic procedures
Q088 // Provide emotional support in preparation for therapeutic procedures
Q089 // Provide pain reduction measures
Q090 // Manage wounds
FACTOR 9 // Learning: Technical Skills
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 9 // 1©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
There are many pieces of analysis that, when combined, create a comprehensive picture of your institution’s performance for this factor. The firstanalysis to examine is the current performance of the factor. This information, coupled with understanding of individual population perceptions,external benchmarks, longitudinal trends, individual scaled question performance, and other institutional information or assessment is invaluableto constructing an effective Action Plan for improvement.
Factor Performance // AggregateBelow is your institution's current performance for Technical Skills and its scaled questions. While this factor might be difficult to improvedirectly, improving its scaled questions will likely be easier and will result in an improvement in the factor.
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 9 // Learning: Technical Skills 56 5.45 1.18 74.2%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR QUESTION PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Q089 // Provide pain reduction measures 55 5.71 1.19 78.5%
Q087 // Provide physical support in preparation for therapeutic procedures 55 5.56 1.33 76.0%
Q088 // Provide emotional support in preparation for therapeutic procedures 55 5.45 1.28 74.2%
Q090 // Manage wounds 53 4.92 1.56 65.3%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 9 // Learning: Technical Skills
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 9 // 2©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factor Performance // Key PopulationsKey categorical questions have been selected and are reported below. Answer options within each categorical question are divided into twogroups in order to facilitate a statistical testing of means; a designates the population which is statistically higher than the other population, a
designates the population that is statistically lower and an indicates that the populations have statistically equal factor means. Relativepopulation size (% Total) and Performance values for each group are plotted. To review this factor reported by all categorical questions and for allanswer options, please refer to the Online Reporting.
If this factor is included in your Action Plan, consider the behavior of these populations to determine if targeted interventions are needed.
WHAT IS YOUR GENDER?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
Female 49 5.48 1.24 74.7%
52 86.7% Male 7 5.25 0.53 70.8%
8 13.3% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
RACE/ETHNICITY (REPORTING ONLY)
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
White 54 5.42 1.19 73.7%
57 95% All others N/A 2 NR NR NR NR
3 5% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
HOW MANY YEARS OF FULL-TIME HEALTH RELATED WORK EXPERIENCE DID YOU HAVE PRIOR TO ENTERING THIS PROGRAM?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
Less than one year of work experience 31 5.51 0.92 75.2%
33 55% One or more years of work experience 25 5.38 1.43 73.0%
27 45% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
WHAT IS YOUR CUMULATIVE GPA?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
3.00 GPA and higher 49 5.45 1.19 74.2%
53 89.8% Below 3.00 GPA 6 5.33 1.17 72.2%
6 10.2% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 9 // Learning: Technical Skills
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 9 // 3©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
WHAT WAS YOUR SAT MATH+VERBAL OR ACT COMPOSITE SCORE? (HIGHEST SCORE IF YOU TOOK MULTIPLE TESTS)
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
SAT 1241 / ACT 28 and higher 6 5.50 0.99 75.0%
7 29.2% SAT 1240 / ACT 27 and below 17 5.47 0.89 74.5%
17 70.8% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 9 // Learning: Technical Skills
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 9 // 4©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factor Performance // Degree ProgramIn this report, the institutional mean and a breakdown by Degree Program is provided. If this factor is included in your Action Plan, identify thepopulations reporting more positive experiences in order to examine if there are best practices that can be applied to populations reporting lesspositive experiences.
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 9 // Learning: Technical Skills 56 5.45 1.18 74.2%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR PERFORMANCE BY DEGREE PROGRAM
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
BSN, with no prior nursing experience or degree 42 5.57 0.91 76.2%
RN-to-BSN (completed an RN) 12 5.06 1.83 67.7%
BSN, have completed other non-nursing degree(s) 2 NR NR NR NR
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 9 // Learning: Technical Skills
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 9 // 5©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
In this report, Skyfactor Benchworks compares your institutional results to your Select 6, Carnegie Class, and all participating institutions for thefactor and its scaled questions. A designates where your institution’s mean is statistically higher than the comparative group; a designateswhere your institution’s mean is statistically lower than the comparative group; and designates where your institution’s mean is statisticallyequal to the comparative group. A ranking of your institution and the external benchmarking groups is also provided. If your institution’sperformance is below that of an external benchmarking group, use this information to motivate staff that higher performance is possible; but ifyour institutional performance is higher, celebrate!
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 56 5.45 1.18 -- -- -- -- 74.2%
Select 6 433 5.79 0.99 5.45 5.96 7/7 79.8%
Carnegie Class 728 5.77 1.18 5.10 6.89 18/23 79.5%
All Institutions 25,468 5.71 1.14 4.68 6.94 214/269 78.5%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR QUESTION PERFORMANCE
SELECT 6CARNEGIE
CLASSALL
INST. N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Q089 // Provide pain reduction measures 55 5.71 1.19 78.5%
Q087 // Provide physical support in preparationfor therapeutic procedures
55 5.56 1.33 76.0%
Q088 // Provide emotional support in preparationfor therapeutic procedures
55 5.45 1.28 74.2%
Q090 // Manage wounds 53 4.92 1.56 65.3%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 9 // Technical Skills
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 9 // 6©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
The final analysis for the factor is its performance over time. Longitudinal trends support continuous improvement and are the key to evaluatingthe success of your institution’s action plan for this factor. If your institution’s current performance falls short of expectations, review the actionsconducted and make adjustments.
If your institution participated in two or more iterations of this assessment, a longitudinal trend is plotted. If your institution did not participatecontinuously, Skyfactor extrapolated between successive iterations. A designates years where your institution performs statistically higherthan the current year; a designates years where your program is statistically lower in performance; and a represents years that arestatistically equal to the current year.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
70%
80%
90%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 77.2% 78.5% 80.6% 76.5% 74.2%
Mean 5.63 5.71 5.83 5.59 5.45
FACTOR 9 // Learning: Technical Skills
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 9 // 7©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q087 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Provide physical support in preparation for therapeutic procedures
A summary of Q087 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 55 5.56 1.33 -- -- -- -- 76.0%
Select 6 429 5.88 1.13 5.56 6.10 7/7 81.3%
Carnegie Class 720 5.85 1.24 5.11 7.00 18/23 80.8%
All Institutions 25,017 5.76 1.24 4.84 7.00 195/268 79.3%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 1.8% 1.8% 1.8% 16.4% 14.5% 38.2% 25.5%
Select 6 0.5% 1.6% 1.4% 7.5% 16.8% 39.9% 32.4%
Carnegie Class 1.3% 1.2% 1.7% 10.6% 15.5% 33.9% 35.9%
All Institutions 1.0% 1.3% 2.4% 10.9% 17.4% 35.3% 31.8%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
70%
80%
90%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 77.8% 79.4% 80.3% 76.2% 76.1%
Mean 5.67 5.76 5.82 5.57 5.56
FACTOR 9 // Learning: Technical Skills // Q087
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 9 // 8©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q088 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Provide emotional support in preparation for therapeutic procedures
A summary of Q088 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 55 5.45 1.28 -- -- -- -- 74.2%
Select 6 429 5.92 1.10 5.45 6.12 7/7 82.0%
Carnegie Class 722 5.90 1.26 5.10 7.00 20/23 81.7%
All Institutions 25,132 5.81 1.23 4.95 7.00 230/268 80.2%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 0.0% 3.6% 1.8% 20.0% 16.4% 36.4% 21.8%
Select 6 0.5% 0.9% 2.1% 7.0% 14.9% 41.0% 33.6%
Carnegie Class 1.4% 1.0% 2.1% 9.5% 15.3% 32.3% 38.4%
All Institutions 0.8% 1.2% 2.5% 10.3% 16.4% 34.8% 34.0%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
70%
80%
90%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 76.7% 77.9% 80.8% 76.7% 74.2%
Mean 5.60 5.68 5.85 5.60 5.45
FACTOR 9 // Learning: Technical Skills // Q088
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 9 // 9©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q089 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Provide pain reduction measures
A summary of Q089 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 55 5.71 1.19 -- -- -- -- 78.5%
Select 6 425 6.04 1.07 5.71 6.30 7/7 84.0%
Carnegie Class 598 5.99 1.12 5.17 6.60 13/17 83.2%
All Institutions 22,511 5.92 1.18 4.65 7.00 190/236 82.0%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 0.0% 3.6% 0.0% 12.7% 14.5% 43.6% 25.5%
Select 6 0.5% 0.9% 1.2% 5.6% 14.4% 37.6% 39.8%
Carnegie Class 0.3% 0.9% 1.7% 9.2% 14.2% 34.5% 39.2%
All Institutions 0.8% 0.9% 1.9% 8.9% 14.8% 34.9% 37.9%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
70%
80%
2015
Performance 78.5%
Mean 5.71
FACTOR 9 // Learning: Technical Skills // Q089
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 9 // 10©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q090 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Manage wounds
A summary of Q090 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 53 4.92 1.56 -- -- -- -- 65.3%
Select 6 420 5.34 1.36 4.92 5.58 7/7 72.3%
Carnegie Class 593 5.32 1.47 4.62 6.53 13/17 72.0%
All Institutions 22,112 5.30 1.48 3.93 6.75 196/236 71.7%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 3.8% 5.7% 9.4% 13.2% 24.5% 30.2% 13.2%
Select 6 1.4% 3.1% 5.2% 13.3% 24.0% 33.1% 19.8%
Carnegie Class 1.4% 4.0% 7.1% 15.5% 20.4% 27.4% 24.1%
All Institutions 2.5% 3.1% 5.9% 15.1% 20.8% 29.1% 23.5%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
60%
70%
2015
Performance 65.4%
Mean 4.92
FACTOR 9 // Learning: Technical Skills // Q090
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 9 // 11©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factors, a composite of scaled questions that explain a larger concept, are utilized in Skyfactor Benchworks’ reporting to reduce complexity andstrengthen the analysis. Skyfactor provides an in-depth analysis of the factor, Core Knowledge, in this section of reports.
You are likely referencing this section to better understand this factor due to: 1) this factor is a high predictor; 2) this factor is performing below adesired level; 3) this factor is of special interest to your institution; or 4) this factor is an indicator. Through this analysis (i.e., currentperformance, external benchmark comparisons, and longitudinal trends), a thorough picture of the factor should emerge, however additionalinformation can be found in Skyfactor Benchworks’ Online Reports.
If improving this factor is a goal for your institution, actions should be targeted toward the factor’s scaled questions (see list below) which aremore tangible and more directly actionable. Analysis for these scaled questions is provided in this section allowing for sufficient understanding;additional information can be found in Skyfactor Benchworks’ Online Reports.
FACTOR COMPOSITION
Core Knowledge // To what degree did the nursing program teach you to:
Q068 // Understand how health care delivery systems are organized
Q072 // Use appropriate technologies to assess patients
Q073 // Understand the effects of health policies on diverse populations
Q074 // Understand the global health care environment
Q075 // Incorporate knowledge of cost factors when delivering care
Q076 // Communicate with healthcare professionals to deliver high quality patient care
Q077 // Work with inter-professional teams
Q078 // Assess predictive factors that influence the health of patients
Q086 // Apply an ethical decision-making framework to clinical situations
Q092 // Assist patients to achieve a peaceful end of life
FACTOR 10 // Learning: Core Knowledge
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 10 // 1©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
There are many pieces of analysis that, when combined, create a comprehensive picture of your institution’s performance for this factor. The firstanalysis to examine is the current performance of the factor. This information, coupled with understanding of individual population perceptions,external benchmarks, longitudinal trends, individual scaled question performance, and other institutional information or assessment is invaluableto constructing an effective Action Plan for improvement.
Factor Performance // AggregateBelow is your institution's current performance for Core Knowledge and its scaled questions. While this factor might be difficult to improvedirectly, improving its scaled questions will likely be easier and will result in an improvement in the factor.
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 10 // Learning: Core Knowledge 58 5.45 0.99 74.2%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR QUESTION PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Q086 // Apply an ethical decision-making framework to clinical situations 57 5.86 1.08 81.0%
Q073 // Understand the effects of health policies on diverse populations 56 5.59 1.15 76.5%
Q076 // Communicate with healthcare professionals to deliver high quality patient care 57 5.54 1.14 75.7%
Q068 // Understand how health care delivery systems are organized 58 5.47 1.12 74.5%
Q072 // Use appropriate technologies to assess patients 57 5.46 1.34 74.3%
Q078 // Assess predictive factors that influence the health of patients 56 5.43 1.28 73.8%
Q075 // Incorporate knowledge of cost factors when delivering care 57 5.40 1.17 73.3%
Q077 // Work with inter-professional teams 57 5.40 1.32 73.3%
Q074 // Understand the global health care environment 56 5.27 1.19 71.2%
Q092 // Assist patients to achieve a peaceful end of life 54 5.20 1.54 70.0%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 10 // Learning: Core Knowledge
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 10 // 2©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factor Performance // Key PopulationsKey categorical questions have been selected and are reported below. Answer options within each categorical question are divided into twogroups in order to facilitate a statistical testing of means; a designates the population which is statistically higher than the other population, a
designates the population that is statistically lower and an indicates that the populations have statistically equal factor means. Relativepopulation size (% Total) and Performance values for each group are plotted. To review this factor reported by all categorical questions and for allanswer options, please refer to the Online Reporting.
If this factor is included in your Action Plan, consider the behavior of these populations to determine if targeted interventions are needed.
WHAT IS YOUR GENDER?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
Male 7 5.47 0.52 74.5%
8 13.3% Female 51 5.44 1.04 74.0%
52 86.7% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
RACE/ETHNICITY (REPORTING ONLY)
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
White 56 5.41 0.99 73.5%
57 95% All others N/A 2 NR NR NR NR
3 5% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
HOW MANY YEARS OF FULL-TIME HEALTH RELATED WORK EXPERIENCE DID YOU HAVE PRIOR TO ENTERING THIS PROGRAM?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
One or more years of work experience 26 5.47 1.07 74.5%
27 45% Less than one year of work experience 32 5.42 0.92 73.7%
33 55% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
WHAT IS YOUR CUMULATIVE GPA?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
3.00 GPA and higher 51 5.47 0.97 74.5%
53 89.8% Below 3.00 GPA 6 5.17 1.16 69.5%
6 10.2% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 10 // Learning: Core Knowledge
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 10 // 3©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
WHAT WAS YOUR SAT MATH+VERBAL OR ACT COMPOSITE SCORE? (HIGHEST SCORE IF YOU TOOK MULTIPLE TESTS)
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
SAT 1240 / ACT 27 and below 17 5.49 0.84 74.8%
17 70.8% SAT 1241 / ACT 28 and higher 6 5.10 0.94 68.3%
7 29.2% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 10 // Learning: Core Knowledge
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 10 // 4©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factor Performance // Degree ProgramIn this report, the institutional mean and a breakdown by Degree Program is provided. If this factor is included in your Action Plan, identify thepopulations reporting more positive experiences in order to examine if there are best practices that can be applied to populations reporting lesspositive experiences.
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 10 // Learning: Core Knowledge 58 5.45 0.99 74.2%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR PERFORMANCE BY DEGREE PROGRAM
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
RN-to-BSN (completed an RN) 13 5.51 1.25 75.2%
BSN, with no prior nursing experience or degree 43 5.47 0.88 74.5%
BSN, have completed other non-nursing degree(s) 2 NR NR NR NR
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 10 // Learning: Core Knowledge
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 10 // 5©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
In this report, Skyfactor Benchworks compares your institutional results to your Select 6, Carnegie Class, and all participating institutions for thefactor and its scaled questions. A designates where your institution’s mean is statistically higher than the comparative group; a designateswhere your institution’s mean is statistically lower than the comparative group; and designates where your institution’s mean is statisticallyequal to the comparative group. A ranking of your institution and the external benchmarking groups is also provided. If your institution’sperformance is below that of an external benchmarking group, use this information to motivate staff that higher performance is possible; but ifyour institutional performance is higher, celebrate!
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 58 5.45 0.99 -- -- -- -- 74.2%
Select 6 437 5.66 0.91 5.42 5.90 6/7 77.7%
Carnegie Class 817 5.75 1.07 4.91 6.78 21/24 79.2%
All Institutions 26,172 5.61 1.06 4.53 6.78 192/271 76.8%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR QUESTION PERFORMANCE
SELECT 6CARNEGIE
CLASSALL
INST. N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Q086 // Apply an ethical decision-makingframework to clinical situations
57 5.86 1.08 81.0%
Q073 // Understand the effects of health policieson diverse populations
56 5.59 1.15 76.5%
Q076 // Communicate with healthcareprofessionals to deliver high quality patient care
57 5.54 1.14 75.7%
Q068 // Understand how health care deliverysystems are organized
58 5.47 1.12 74.5%
Q072 // Use appropriate technologies to assesspatients
57 5.46 1.34 74.3%
Q078 // Assess predictive factors that influencethe health of patients
56 5.43 1.28 73.8%
Q075 // Incorporate knowledge of cost factorswhen delivering care
57 5.40 1.17 73.3%
Q077 // Work with inter-professional teams 57 5.40 1.32 73.3%
Q074 // Understand the global health careenvironment
56 5.27 1.19 71.2%
Q092 // Assist patients to achieve a peaceful endof life
54 5.20 1.54 70.0%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 10 // Core Knowledge
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 10 // 6©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
The final analysis for the factor is its performance over time. Longitudinal trends support continuous improvement and are the key to evaluatingthe success of your institution’s action plan for this factor. If your institution’s current performance falls short of expectations, review the actionsconducted and make adjustments.
If your institution participated in two or more iterations of this assessment, a longitudinal trend is plotted. If your institution did not participatecontinuously, Skyfactor extrapolated between successive iterations. A designates years where your institution performs statistically higherthan the current year; a designates years where your program is statistically lower in performance; and a represents years that arestatistically equal to the current year.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
70%
80%
90%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 76.1% 77.6% 79.9% 72.5% 74.1%
Mean 5.56 5.66 5.80 5.35 5.45
FACTOR 10 // Learning: Core Knowledge
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 10 // 7©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q068 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Understand how health care delivery systems are organized
A summary of Q068 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 58 5.47 1.12 -- -- -- -- 74.5%
Select 6 436 5.50 1.13 5.29 6.00 5/7 75.0%
Carnegie Class 815 5.67 1.20 4.82 6.79 19/24 77.8%
All Institutions 25,996 5.51 1.25 4.29 6.79 156/270 75.2%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 0.0% 1.7% 0.0% 20.7% 24.1% 34.5% 19.0%
Select 6 0.2% 1.4% 3.2% 12.4% 27.8% 35.8% 19.3%
Carnegie Class 0.5% 1.0% 3.4% 12.0% 21.2% 34.4% 27.5%
All Institutions 0.7% 1.5% 3.7% 14.5% 22.4% 33.6% 23.5%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
70%
80%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 73.6% 75.0% 77.0% 70.6% 74.4%
Mean 5.42 5.50 5.62 5.24 5.47
FACTOR 10 // Learning: Core Knowledge // Q068
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 10 // 8©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q072 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Use appropriate technologies to assess patients
A summary of Q072 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 57 5.46 1.34 -- -- -- -- 74.3%
Select 6 433 5.72 1.07 5.46 5.93 7/7 78.7%
Carnegie Class 727 5.65 1.29 4.95 6.86 18/23 77.5%
All Institutions 25,471 5.67 1.25 4.34 6.86 206/269 77.8%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 1.8% 3.5% 0.0% 15.8% 22.8% 33.3% 22.8%
Select 6 0.2% 1.2% 2.1% 9.2% 19.6% 45.5% 22.2%
Carnegie Class 1.0% 2.0% 2.9% 12.5% 17.5% 35.6% 28.4%
All Institutions 0.9% 1.4% 3.0% 11.6% 18.8% 35.9% 28.4%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
70%
80%
90%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 77.8% 77.2% 80.2% 75.6% 74.3%
Mean 5.67 5.63 5.81 5.54 5.46
FACTOR 10 // Learning: Core Knowledge // Q072
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 10 // 9©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q073 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Understand the effects of health policies on diverse populations
A summary of Q073 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 56 5.59 1.15 -- -- -- -- 76.5%
Select 6 434 5.66 1.16 5.44 6.00 6/7 77.7%
Carnegie Class 813 5.81 1.22 5.06 6.86 18/24 80.2%
All Institutions 25,918 5.62 1.26 4.41 6.86 157/270 77.0%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 0.0% 1.8% 3.6% 10.7% 23.2% 39.3% 21.4%
Select 6 0.2% 1.8% 3.5% 9.2% 19.6% 42.4% 23.3%
Carnegie Class 0.6% 1.4% 2.8% 9.8% 17.7% 34.6% 33.1%
All Institutions 0.7% 1.6% 3.5% 12.7% 19.9% 33.7% 27.9%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
70%
80%
90%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 76.4% 79.8% 84.2% 73.3% 76.5%
Mean 5.58 5.79 6.05 5.40 5.59
FACTOR 10 // Learning: Core Knowledge // Q073
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 10 // 10©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q074 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Understand the global health care environment
A summary of Q074 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 56 5.27 1.19 -- -- -- -- 71.2%
Select 6 432 5.47 1.24 5.15 6.00 6/7 74.5%
Carnegie Class 814 5.63 1.33 4.62 6.75 20/24 77.2%
All Institutions 25,948 5.39 1.39 4.00 6.75 172/271 73.2%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 0.0% 1.8% 1.8% 30.4% 14.3% 37.5% 14.3%
Select 6 0.0% 2.8% 5.1% 11.6% 24.1% 35.4% 21.1%
Carnegie Class 1.4% 1.1% 3.8% 14.4% 17.1% 33.2% 29.0%
All Institutions 1.5% 2.5% 5.2% 15.6% 20.8% 30.5% 23.9%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
60%
70%
80%
90%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 76.0% 75.4% 80.6% 69.9% 71.1%
Mean 5.56 5.53 5.84 5.19 5.27
FACTOR 10 // Learning: Core Knowledge // Q074
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 10 // 11©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q075 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Incorporate knowledge of cost factors when delivering care
A summary of Q075 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 57 5.40 1.17 -- -- -- -- 73.3%
Select 6 432 5.30 1.35 4.74 5.71 5/7 71.7%
Carnegie Class 810 5.47 1.44 4.15 6.75 16/24 74.5%
All Institutions 25,837 5.21 1.47 3.61 6.75 97/271 70.2%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 0.0% 1.8% 3.5% 17.5% 24.6% 35.1% 17.5%
Select 6 0.9% 2.8% 6.7% 14.4% 25.7% 29.2% 20.4%
Carnegie Class 2.0% 2.1% 5.2% 14.0% 18.8% 31.3% 26.8%
All Institutions 1.9% 3.6% 6.9% 17.0% 21.2% 28.2% 21.2%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
70%
80%
90%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 75.3% 77.6% 81.1% 72.5% 73.4%
Mean 5.52 5.66 5.86 5.35 5.40
FACTOR 10 // Learning: Core Knowledge // Q075
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 10 // 12©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q076 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Communicate with healthcare professionals to deliver high qualitypatient care
A summary of Q076 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 57 5.54 1.14 -- -- -- -- 75.7%
Select 6 435 5.79 1.18 5.54 6.17 7/7 79.8%
Carnegie Class 812 5.81 1.25 4.90 6.86 19/24 80.2%
All Institutions 25,904 5.73 1.25 4.66 6.86 199/271 78.8%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 0.0% 1.8% 1.8% 17.5% 17.5% 42.1% 19.3%
Select 6 0.5% 0.9% 2.8% 10.1% 18.9% 34.3% 32.6%
Carnegie Class 0.6% 1.8% 2.4% 11.2% 15.8% 33.8% 34.4%
All Institutions 0.8% 1.4% 3.1% 10.9% 17.7% 34.5% 31.7%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
70%
80%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 79.3% 77.6% 79.2% 71.1% 75.7%
Mean 5.76 5.66 5.75 5.27 5.54
FACTOR 10 // Learning: Core Knowledge // Q076
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 10 // 13©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q077 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Work with inter-professional teams
A summary of Q077 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 57 5.40 1.32 -- -- -- -- 73.3%
Select 6 431 5.72 1.20 5.40 5.95 7/7 78.7%
Carnegie Class 803 5.75 1.32 4.85 6.86 20/23 79.2%
All Institutions 25,707 5.66 1.30 4.63 6.86 212/270 77.7%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 0.0% 5.3% 1.8% 19.3% 14.0% 40.4% 19.3%
Select 6 0.5% 0.9% 4.2% 9.5% 20.0% 35.5% 29.5%
Carnegie Class 1.2% 2.2% 2.9% 10.7% 16.6% 32.7% 33.7%
All Institutions 1.0% 1.6% 3.7% 11.8% 18.2% 33.1% 30.5%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
70%
80%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 75.0% 76.8% 77.1% 71.1% 73.4%
Mean 5.50 5.61 5.63 5.26 5.40
FACTOR 10 // Learning: Core Knowledge // Q077
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 10 // 14©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q078 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Assess predictive factors that influence the health of patients
A summary of Q078 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 56 5.43 1.28 -- -- -- -- 73.8%
Select 6 434 5.83 1.05 5.43 6.00 7/7 80.5%
Carnegie Class 811 5.88 1.14 5.20 6.79 20/24 81.3%
All Institutions 25,792 5.76 1.17 4.54 6.79 226/270 79.3%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 0.0% 3.6% 3.6% 17.9% 16.1% 39.3% 19.6%
Select 6 0.0% 0.7% 2.8% 7.6% 19.1% 41.5% 28.3%
Carnegie Class 0.6% 0.7% 2.1% 9.8% 18.5% 33.8% 34.6%
All Institutions 0.6% 1.0% 2.3% 10.7% 18.6% 36.9% 29.9%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
70%
80%
90%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 76.0% 80.7% 80.6% 71.6% 73.8%
Mean 5.56 5.84 5.84 5.30 5.43
FACTOR 10 // Learning: Core Knowledge // Q078
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 10 // 15©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q086 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Apply an ethical decision-making framework to clinical situations
A summary of Q086 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 57 5.86 1.08 -- -- -- -- 81.0%
Select 6 428 6.08 1.02 5.72 6.48 6/7 84.7%
Carnegie Class 807 6.13 1.09 5.45 7.00 18/24 85.5%
All Institutions 25,716 5.99 1.12 5.10 7.00 189/271 83.2%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 0.0% 0.0% 3.5% 12.3% 8.8% 45.6% 29.8%
Select 6 0.2% 0.7% 1.2% 6.1% 12.6% 39.0% 40.2%
Carnegie Class 0.6% 0.7% 0.9% 6.8% 12.6% 32.3% 46.1%
All Institutions 0.5% 0.7% 1.5% 8.2% 14.7% 34.7% 39.7%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
70%
80%
90%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 77.3% 81.1% 82.9% 78.4% 81.0%
Mean 5.64 5.87 5.97 5.70 5.86
FACTOR 10 // Learning: Core Knowledge // Q086
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 10 // 16©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q092 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Assist patients to achieve a peaceful end of life
A summary of Q092 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 54 5.20 1.54 -- -- -- -- 70.0%
Select 6 421 5.58 1.35 5.20 6.06 7/7 76.3%
Carnegie Class 786 5.73 1.40 4.74 6.79 19/22 78.8%
All Institutions 24,853 5.54 1.41 4.44 6.79 209/267 75.7%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 3.7% 5.6% 3.7% 11.1% 24.1% 33.3% 18.5%
Select 6 1.0% 2.9% 4.5% 10.9% 19.0% 33.3% 28.5%
Carnegie Class 2.0% 2.0% 3.5% 10.8% 16.3% 28.9% 36.4%
All Institutions 1.8% 2.4% 4.4% 12.8% 18.2% 31.3% 29.1%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
60%
70%
80%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 73.3% 75.0% 75.8% 70.6% 70.1%
Mean 5.40 5.50 5.55 5.24 5.20
FACTOR 10 // Learning: Core Knowledge // Q092
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 10 // 17©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factors, a composite of scaled questions that explain a larger concept, are utilized in Skyfactor Benchworks’ reporting to reduce complexity andstrengthen the analysis. Skyfactor provides an in-depth analysis of the factor, Role Development, in this section of reports.
You are likely referencing this section to better understand this factor due to: 1) this factor is a high predictor; 2) this factor is performing below adesired level; 3) this factor is of special interest to your institution; or 4) this factor is an indicator. Through this analysis (i.e., currentperformance, external benchmark comparisons, and longitudinal trends), a thorough picture of the factor should emerge, however additionalinformation can be found in Skyfactor Benchworks’ Online Reports.
If improving this factor is a goal for your institution, actions should be targeted toward the factor’s scaled questions (see list below) which aremore tangible and more directly actionable. Analysis for these scaled questions is provided in this section allowing for sufficient understanding;additional information can be found in Skyfactor Benchworks’ Online Reports.
FACTOR COMPOSITION
Role Development // To what degree did your non-nursing courses enhance your ability to:
Q066 // Integrate theories and concepts from liberal education into nursing practice.
Q067 // Value the ideal of lifelong learning to support excellence in nursing practice.
Role Development // To what degree did the nursing program teach you to:
Q070 // Integrate theory to develop a foundation for practice
Q085 // Incorporate nursing standards into practice
FACTOR 11 // Learning: Role Development
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 11 // 1©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
There are many pieces of analysis that, when combined, create a comprehensive picture of your institution’s performance for this factor. The firstanalysis to examine is the current performance of the factor. This information, coupled with understanding of individual population perceptions,external benchmarks, longitudinal trends, individual scaled question performance, and other institutional information or assessment is invaluableto constructing an effective Action Plan for improvement.
Factor Performance // AggregateBelow is your institution's current performance for Role Development and its scaled questions. While this factor might be difficult to improvedirectly, improving its scaled questions will likely be easier and will result in an improvement in the factor.
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 11 // Learning: Role Development 58 5.00 1.05 66.7%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR QUESTION PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Q085 // Incorporate nursing standards into practice 56 5.93 0.98 82.2%
Q070 // Integrate theory to develop a foundation for practice 57 5.32 1.14 72.0%
Q067 // Value the ideal of lifelong learning to support excellence in nursing practice. 54 4.56 1.63 59.3%
Q066 // Integrate theories and concepts from liberal education into nursing practice. 54 4.20 1.63 53.3%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 11 // Learning: Role Development
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 11 // 2©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factor Performance // Key PopulationsKey categorical questions have been selected and are reported below. Answer options within each categorical question are divided into twogroups in order to facilitate a statistical testing of means; a designates the population which is statistically higher than the other population, a
designates the population that is statistically lower and an indicates that the populations have statistically equal factor means. Relativepopulation size (% Total) and Performance values for each group are plotted. To review this factor reported by all categorical questions and for allanswer options, please refer to the Online Reporting.
If this factor is included in your Action Plan, consider the behavior of these populations to determine if targeted interventions are needed.
WHAT IS YOUR GENDER?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
Female 51 5.05 1.09 67.5%
52 86.7% Male 7 4.68 0.65 61.3%
8 13.3% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
RACE/ETHNICITY (REPORTING ONLY)
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
White 56 4.98 1.06 66.3%
57 95% All others N/A 2 NR NR NR NR
3 5% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
HOW MANY YEARS OF FULL-TIME HEALTH RELATED WORK EXPERIENCE DID YOU HAVE PRIOR TO ENTERING THIS PROGRAM?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
One or more years of work experience 26 5.29 1.06 71.5%
27 45% Less than one year of work experience 32 4.77 0.99 62.8%
33 55% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
WHAT IS YOUR CUMULATIVE GPA?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
3.00 GPA and higher 51 5.00 1.08 66.7%
53 89.8% Below 3.00 GPA 6 4.88 0.73 64.7%
6 10.2% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 11 // Learning: Role Development
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 11 // 3©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
WHAT WAS YOUR SAT MATH+VERBAL OR ACT COMPOSITE SCORE? (HIGHEST SCORE IF YOU TOOK MULTIPLE TESTS)
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
SAT 1240 / ACT 27 and below 17 4.93 0.83 65.5%
17 70.8% SAT 1241 / ACT 28 and higher 6 4.62 0.92 60.3%
7 29.2% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 11 // Learning: Role Development
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 11 // 4©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factor Performance // Degree ProgramIn this report, the institutional mean and a breakdown by Degree Program is provided. If this factor is included in your Action Plan, identify thepopulations reporting more positive experiences in order to examine if there are best practices that can be applied to populations reporting lesspositive experiences.
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 11 // Learning: Role Development 58 5.00 1.05 66.7%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR PERFORMANCE BY DEGREE PROGRAM
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
RN-to-BSN (completed an RN) 13 5.25 1.33 70.8%
BSN, with no prior nursing experience or degree 43 4.90 0.95 65.0%
BSN, have completed other non-nursing degree(s) 2 NR NR NR NR
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 11 // Learning: Role Development
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 11 // 5©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
In this report, Skyfactor Benchworks compares your institutional results to your Select 6, Carnegie Class, and all participating institutions for thefactor and its scaled questions. A designates where your institution’s mean is statistically higher than the comparative group; a designateswhere your institution’s mean is statistically lower than the comparative group; and designates where your institution’s mean is statisticallyequal to the comparative group. A ranking of your institution and the external benchmarking groups is also provided. If your institution’sperformance is below that of an external benchmarking group, use this information to motivate staff that higher performance is possible; but ifyour institutional performance is higher, celebrate!
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 58 5.00 1.05 -- -- -- -- 66.7%
Select 6 438 5.50 1.02 5.00 5.73 7/7 75.0%
Carnegie Class 819 5.62 1.14 4.58 6.56 22/24 77.0%
All Institutions 26,241 5.49 1.11 4.29 6.75 246/271 74.8%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR QUESTION PERFORMANCE
SELECT 6CARNEGIE
CLASSALL
INST. N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Q085 // Incorporate nursing standards intopractice
56 5.93 0.98 82.2%
Q070 // Integrate theory to develop a foundationfor practice
57 5.32 1.14 72.0%
Q067 // Value the ideal of lifelong learning tosupport excellence in nursing practice.
54 4.56 1.63 59.3%
Q066 // Integrate theories and concepts fromliberal education into nursing practice.
54 4.20 1.63 53.3%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 11 // Role Development
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 11 // 6©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
The final analysis for the factor is its performance over time. Longitudinal trends support continuous improvement and are the key to evaluatingthe success of your institution’s action plan for this factor. If your institution’s current performance falls short of expectations, review the actionsconducted and make adjustments.
If your institution participated in two or more iterations of this assessment, a longitudinal trend is plotted. If your institution did not participatecontinuously, Skyfactor extrapolated between successive iterations. A designates years where your institution performs statistically higherthan the current year; a designates years where your program is statistically lower in performance; and a represents years that arestatistically equal to the current year.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
60%
70%
80%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 69.7% 71.6% 72.4% 64.7% 66.7%
Mean 5.18 5.30 5.34 4.88 5.00
FACTOR 11 // Learning: Role Development
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 11 // 7©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q066 // Liberal Education for Baccalaureate Generalist Nursing Practice // To what degree did your non-nursing courses enhance your ability to: Integrate theories and concepts from liberal education into nursingpractice.
A summary of Q066 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 54 4.20 1.63 -- -- -- -- 53.3%
Select 6 429 4.82 1.59 4.20 5.14 7/7 63.7%
Carnegie Class 724 5.02 1.58 3.00 6.25 22/23 67.0%
All Institutions 24,445 4.88 1.59 3.00 6.25 246/268 64.7%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 9.3% 13.0% 0.0% 27.8% 31.5% 13.0% 5.6%
Select 6 3.5% 8.6% 5.8% 19.3% 23.1% 26.6% 13.1%
Carnegie Class 4.8% 4.4% 5.1% 22.0% 20.6% 25.3% 17.9%
All Institutions 4.6% 4.5% 7.0% 22.6% 21.3% 23.5% 16.5%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
50%
60%
70%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 60.1% 61.8% 59.9% 54.2% 53.4%
Mean 4.60 4.71 4.59 4.25 4.20
FACTOR 11 // Learning: Role Development // Q066
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 11 // 8©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q067 // Liberal Education for Baccalaureate Generalist Nursing Practice // To what degree did your non-nursing courses enhance your ability to: Value the ideal of lifelong learning to support excellence in nursingpractice.
A summary of Q067 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 54 4.56 1.63 -- -- -- -- 59.3%
Select 6 426 5.23 1.56 4.56 5.58 7/7 70.5%
Carnegie Class 719 5.31 1.58 4.00 6.36 21/23 71.8%
All Institutions 24,496 5.23 1.57 3.69 6.36 243/268 70.5%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 3.7% 9.3% 9.3% 29.6% 16.7% 16.7% 14.8%
Select 6 2.1% 6.6% 4.7% 15.0% 19.2% 29.1% 23.2%
Carnegie Class 3.4% 4.3% 5.2% 16.6% 18.0% 26.3% 26.4%
All Institutions 3.5% 3.5% 5.3% 18.2% 18.7% 25.8% 25.0%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
50%
60%
70%
80%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 62.5% 66.2% 69.4% 56.6% 59.3%
Mean 4.75 4.97 5.16 4.40 4.56
FACTOR 11 // Learning: Role Development // Q067
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 11 // 9©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q070 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Integrate theory to develop a foundation for practice
A summary of Q070 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 57 5.32 1.14 -- -- -- -- 72.0%
Select 6 434 5.74 1.08 5.32 6.00 7/7 79.0%
Carnegie Class 807 5.79 1.19 5.08 6.75 23/24 79.8%
All Institutions 25,953 5.69 1.20 4.39 6.75 235/271 78.2%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 0.0% 1.8% 1.8% 22.8% 26.3% 31.6% 15.8%
Select 6 0.0% 1.2% 2.3% 9.7% 20.3% 41.9% 24.7%
Carnegie Class 0.5% 1.0% 2.9% 10.9% 18.5% 35.0% 31.2%
All Institutions 0.6% 1.1% 2.8% 12.0% 20.3% 35.0% 28.3%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
70%
80%
90%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 77.8% 78.9% 79.7% 71.2% 71.9%
Mean 5.67 5.74 5.78 5.27 5.32
FACTOR 11 // Learning: Role Development // Q070
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 11 // 10©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q085 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Incorporate nursing standards into practice
A summary of Q085 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 56 5.93 0.98 -- -- -- -- 82.2%
Select 6 435 6.18 0.93 5.90 6.48 6/7 86.3%
Carnegie Class 808 6.12 1.08 5.41 7.00 17/24 85.3%
All Institutions 25,814 6.07 1.07 5.07 7.00 200/271 84.5%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 12.5% 14.3% 41.1% 32.1%
Select 6 0.0% 0.5% 0.7% 5.3% 11.3% 38.6% 43.7%
Carnegie Class 0.1% 1.2% 1.0% 6.9% 12.3% 33.6% 44.9%
All Institutions 0.3% 0.6% 1.2% 7.3% 13.0% 34.7% 42.8%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
70%
80%
90%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 78.5% 79.4% 80.6% 77.2% 82.1%
Mean 5.71 5.76 5.84 5.63 5.93
FACTOR 11 // Learning: Role Development // Q085
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 11 // 11©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factors, a composite of scaled questions that explain a larger concept, are utilized in Skyfactor Benchworks’ reporting to reduce complexity andstrengthen the analysis. Benchworks provides an in-depth analysis of the factor, Overall Satisfaction, in this section of reports.
This factor is an overall measure of the indicator, Satisfaction. If improving this indicator is a goal for your institution, actions should be targetedtoward the factors that are predictors of this indicator and their questions which are more tangible and more directly actionable.
Analysis for the scaled questions that compose this measure is provided in the section allowing for sufficient understanding. Through thisanalysis (i.e., current performance, and longitudinal trends), a thorough picture of the factor should emerge, however additional information canbe found in Skyfactor Benchworks’ Online Reports.
FACTOR COMPOSITION
Overall Satisfaction // Regarding your experience at the nursing school, to what degree:
Q100 // Would you recommend the nursing school to a close friend?
Q101 // Did the nursing school provide a positive academic experience?
FACTOR 12 // Overall Satisfaction
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 12 // 1©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
There are many pieces of analysis that, when combined, create a comprehensive picture of your institution’s performance for this factor. The firstanalysis to examine is the current performance of the factor. This information, coupled with understanding of individual population perceptions,external benchmarks, longitudinal trends, individual scaled question performance, and other institutional information or assessment is invaluableto constructing an effective Action Plan for improvement.
Factor Performance // AggregateBelow is your institution's current performance for Overall Satisfaction and its scaled questions. While this factor might be difficult to improvedirectly, improving its scaled questions will likely be easier and will result in an improvement in the factor.
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 12 // Overall Satisfaction 57 4.87 1.62 64.5%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR QUESTION PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Q101 // Did the nursing school provide a positive academic experience? 56 4.88 1.64 64.7%
Q100 // Would you recommend the nursing school to a close friend? 57 4.84 1.70 64.0%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 12 // Overall Satisfaction
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 12 // 2©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factor Performance // Key PopulationsKey categorical questions have been selected and are reported below. Answer options within each categorical question are divided into twogroups in order to facilitate a statistical testing of means; a designates the population which is statistically higher than the other population, a
designates the population that is statistically lower and an indicates that the populations have statistically equal factor means. Relativepopulation size (% Total) and Performance values for each group are plotted. To review this factor reported by all categorical questions and for allanswer options, please refer to the Online Reporting.
If this factor is included in your Action Plan, consider the behavior of these populations to determine if targeted interventions are needed.
WHAT IS YOUR GENDER?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
Female 50 4.92 1.68 65.3%
52 86.7% Male 7 4.50 1.07 58.3%
8 13.3% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
RACE/ETHNICITY (REPORTING ONLY)
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
White 55 4.84 1.63 64.0%
57 95% All others N/A 2 NR NR NR NR
3 5% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
HOW MANY YEARS OF FULL-TIME HEALTH RELATED WORK EXPERIENCE DID YOU HAVE PRIOR TO ENTERING THIS PROGRAM?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
One or more years of work experience 25 5.26 1.40 71.0%
27 45% Less than one year of work experience 32 4.56 1.71 59.3%
33 55% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
WHAT IS YOUR CUMULATIVE GPA?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
3.00 GPA and higher 50 4.99 1.49 66.5%
53 89.8% Below 3.00 GPA 6 3.58 2.03 43.0%
6 10.2% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 12 // Overall Satisfaction
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 12 // 3©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
WHAT WAS YOUR SAT MATH+VERBAL OR ACT COMPOSITE SCORE? (HIGHEST SCORE IF YOU TOOK MULTIPLE TESTS)
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
SAT 1240 / ACT 27 and below 17 4.68 1.64 61.3%
17 70.8% SAT 1241 / ACT 28 and higher 6 4.50 1.32 58.3%
7 29.2% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 12 // Overall Satisfaction
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 12 // 4©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factor Performance // Degree ProgramIn this report, the institutional mean and a breakdown by Degree Program is provided. If this factor is included in your Action Plan, identify thepopulations reporting more positive experiences in order to examine if there are best practices that can be applied to populations reporting lesspositive experiences.
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 12 // Overall Satisfaction 57 4.87 1.62 64.5%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR PERFORMANCE BY DEGREE PROGRAM
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
RN-to-BSN (completed an RN) 12 5.75 1.52 79.2%
BSN, with no prior nursing experience or degree 43 4.64 1.60 60.7%
BSN, have completed other non-nursing degree(s) 2 NR NR NR NR
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 12 // Overall Satisfaction
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 12 // 5©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
In this report, Skyfactor Benchworks compares your institutional results to your Select 6, Carnegie Class, and all participating institutions for thefactor and its scaled questions. A designates where your institution’s mean is statistically higher than the comparative group; a designateswhere your institution’s mean is statistically lower than the comparative group; and designates where your institution’s mean is statisticallyequal to the comparative group. A ranking of your institution and the external benchmarking groups is also provided. If your institution’sperformance is below that of an external benchmarking group, use this information to motivate staff that higher performance is possible; but ifyour institutional performance is higher, celebrate!
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 57 4.87 1.62 -- -- -- -- 64.5%
Select 6 436 5.52 1.50 3.94 6.27 6/7 75.3%
Carnegie Class 813 5.73 1.52 4.41 6.86 20/24 78.8%
All Institutions 25,973 5.50 1.60 2.90 6.87 220/271 75.0%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR QUESTION PERFORMANCE
SELECT 6CARNEGIE
CLASSALL
INST. N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Q101 // Did the nursing school provide a positiveacademic experience?
56 4.88 1.64 64.7%
Q100 // Would you recommend the nursing schoolto a close friend?
57 4.84 1.70 64.0%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 12 // Overall Satisfaction
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 12 // 6©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
The final analysis for the factor is its performance over time. Longitudinal trends support continuous improvement and are the key to evaluatingthe success of your institution’s action plan for this factor. If your institution’s current performance falls short of expectations, review the actionsconducted and make adjustments.
If your institution participated in two or more iterations of this assessment, a longitudinal trend is plotted. If your institution did not participatecontinuously, Skyfactor extrapolated between successive iterations. A designates years where your institution performs statistically higherthan the current year; a designates years where your program is statistically lower in performance; and a represents years that arestatistically equal to the current year.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 75.0% 68.4% 76.8% 47.5% 64.5%
Mean 5.50 5.11 5.61 3.85 4.87
FACTOR 12 // Overall Satisfaction
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 12 // 7©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q100 // Overall Evaluation // Regarding your experience at the nursing school, to what degree: Would yourecommend the nursing school to a close friend?
A summary of Q100 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 57 4.84 1.70 -- -- -- -- 64.0%
Select 6 435 5.47 1.65 3.73 6.23 6/7 74.5%
Carnegie Class 812 5.70 1.65 4.22 6.86 21/24 78.3%
All Institutions 25,905 5.48 1.72 2.57 6.94 215/271 74.7%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 5.3% 5.3% 10.5% 19.3% 17.5% 22.8% 19.3%
Select 6 3.4% 3.9% 6.9% 10.1% 13.6% 27.6% 34.5%
Carnegie Class 4.3% 2.9% 4.6% 10.8% 11.4% 22.4% 43.6%
All Institutions 4.8% 4.0% 4.7% 10.8% 14.2% 23.8% 37.6%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 75.0% 68.4% 77.0% 45.1% 64.0%
Mean 5.50 5.11 5.62 3.71 4.84
FACTOR 12 // Overall Satisfaction // Q100
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 12 // 8©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q101 // Overall Evaluation // Regarding your experience at the nursing school, to what degree: Did thenursing school provide a positive academic experience?
A summary of Q101 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 56 4.88 1.64 -- -- -- -- 64.7%
Select 6 434 5.57 1.43 4.16 6.30 6/7 76.2%
Carnegie Class 809 5.76 1.47 4.52 6.86 21/24 79.3%
All Institutions 25,818 5.53 1.58 3.14 6.86 222/270 75.5%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 5.4% 3.6% 8.9% 21.4% 19.6% 23.2% 17.9%
Select 6 1.2% 3.2% 5.3% 11.8% 17.3% 29.3% 32.0%
Carnegie Class 2.1% 2.5% 4.9% 11.0% 12.9% 26.5% 40.1%
All Institutions 3.0% 3.6% 5.0% 11.1% 15.5% 27.4% 34.5%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
2013 2014 2015
Performance 76.6% 50.0% 64.6%
Mean 5.59 4.00 4.88
FACTOR 12 // Overall Satisfaction // Q101
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 12 // 9©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factors, a composite of scaled questions that explain a larger concept, are utilized in Skyfactor Benchworks’ reporting to reduce complexity andstrengthen the analysis. Benchworks provides an in-depth analysis of the factor, Overall Learning, in this section of reports.
This factor is an overall measure of the indicator, Learning. If improving this indicator is a goal for your institution, actions should be targetedtoward the factors that are predictors of this indicator and their questions which are more tangible and more directly actionable.
Analysis for the scaled questions that compose this measure is provided in the section allowing for sufficient understanding. Through thisanalysis (i.e., current performance, and longitudinal trends), a thorough picture of the factor should emerge, however additional information canbe found in Skyfactor Benchworks’ Online Reports.
FACTOR COMPOSITION
Overall Learning // Regarding your experience at the nursing school, to what degree:
Q102 // Were you challenged to do your best academic work?
Q103 // Were you motivated to do your best academic work?
Q104 // Was the information you learned applicable to your future career?
FACTOR 13 // Overall Learning
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 13 // 1©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
There are many pieces of analysis that, when combined, create a comprehensive picture of your institution’s performance for this factor. The firstanalysis to examine is the current performance of the factor. This information, coupled with understanding of individual population perceptions,external benchmarks, longitudinal trends, individual scaled question performance, and other institutional information or assessment is invaluableto constructing an effective Action Plan for improvement.
Factor Performance // AggregateBelow is your institution's current performance for Overall Learning and its scaled questions. While this factor might be difficult to improvedirectly, improving its scaled questions will likely be easier and will result in an improvement in the factor.
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 13 // Overall Learning 57 5.77 1.12 79.5%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR QUESTION PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Q104 // Was the information you learned applicable to your future career? 56 5.89 1.14 81.5%
Q102 // Were you challenged to do your best academic work? 57 5.84 1.18 80.7%
Q103 // Were you motivated to do your best academic work? 57 5.54 1.45 75.7%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 13 // Overall Learning
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 13 // 2©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factor Performance // Key PopulationsKey categorical questions have been selected and are reported below. Answer options within each categorical question are divided into twogroups in order to facilitate a statistical testing of means; a designates the population which is statistically higher than the other population, a
designates the population that is statistically lower and an indicates that the populations have statistically equal factor means. Relativepopulation size (% Total) and Performance values for each group are plotted. To review this factor reported by all categorical questions and for allanswer options, please refer to the Online Reporting.
If this factor is included in your Action Plan, consider the behavior of these populations to determine if targeted interventions are needed.
WHAT IS YOUR GENDER?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
Female 50 5.82 1.13 80.3%
52 86.7% Male 7 5.38 0.93 73.0%
8 13.3% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
RACE/ETHNICITY (REPORTING ONLY)
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
White 55 5.72 1.11 78.7%
57 95% All others N/A 2 NR NR NR NR
3 5% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
HOW MANY YEARS OF FULL-TIME HEALTH RELATED WORK EXPERIENCE DID YOU HAVE PRIOR TO ENTERING THIS PROGRAM?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
One or more years of work experience 25 5.99 0.95 83.2%
27 45% Less than one year of work experience 32 5.59 1.20 76.5%
33 55% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
WHAT IS YOUR CUMULATIVE GPA?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
3.00 GPA and higher 50 5.81 1.11 80.2%
53 89.8% Below 3.00 GPA 6 5.17 0.98 69.5%
6 10.2% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 13 // Overall Learning
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 13 // 3©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
WHAT WAS YOUR SAT MATH+VERBAL OR ACT COMPOSITE SCORE? (HIGHEST SCORE IF YOU TOOK MULTIPLE TESTS)
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
SAT 1240 / ACT 27 and below 17 5.43 1.14 73.8%
17 70.8% SAT 1241 / ACT 28 and higher 6 5.33 1.11 72.2%
7 29.2% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 13 // Overall Learning
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 13 // 4©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factor Performance // Degree ProgramIn this report, the institutional mean and a breakdown by Degree Program is provided. If this factor is included in your Action Plan, identify thepopulations reporting more positive experiences in order to examine if there are best practices that can be applied to populations reporting lesspositive experiences.
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 13 // Overall Learning 57 5.77 1.12 79.5%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR PERFORMANCE BY DEGREE PROGRAM
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
RN-to-BSN (completed an RN) 12 6.03 1.22 83.8%
BSN, with no prior nursing experience or degree 43 5.73 1.09 78.8%
BSN, have completed other non-nursing degree(s) 2 NR NR NR NR
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 13 // Overall Learning
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 13 // 5©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
In this report, Skyfactor Benchworks compares your institutional results to your Select 6, Carnegie Class, and all participating institutions for thefactor and its scaled questions. A designates where your institution’s mean is statistically higher than the comparative group; a designateswhere your institution’s mean is statistically lower than the comparative group; and designates where your institution’s mean is statisticallyequal to the comparative group. A ranking of your institution and the external benchmarking groups is also provided. If your institution’sperformance is below that of an external benchmarking group, use this information to motivate staff that higher performance is possible; but ifyour institutional performance is higher, celebrate!
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 57 5.77 1.12 -- -- -- -- 79.5%
Select 6 436 5.95 1.05 5.48 6.22 6/7 82.5%
Carnegie Class 813 6.06 1.15 5.36 6.93 19/24 84.3%
All Institutions 26,016 5.97 1.16 4.73 6.93 199/272 82.8%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR QUESTION PERFORMANCE
SELECT 6CARNEGIE
CLASSALL
INST. N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Q104 // Was the information you learnedapplicable to your future career?
56 5.89 1.14 81.5%
Q102 // Were you challenged to do your bestacademic work?
57 5.84 1.18 80.7%
Q103 // Were you motivated to do your bestacademic work?
57 5.54 1.45 75.7%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 13 // Overall Learning
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 13 // 6©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
The final analysis for the factor is its performance over time. Longitudinal trends support continuous improvement and are the key to evaluatingthe success of your institution’s action plan for this factor. If your institution’s current performance falls short of expectations, review the actionsconducted and make adjustments.
If your institution participated in two or more iterations of this assessment, a longitudinal trend is plotted. If your institution did not participatecontinuously, Skyfactor extrapolated between successive iterations. A designates years where your institution performs statistically higherthan the current year; a designates years where your program is statistically lower in performance; and a represents years that arestatistically equal to the current year.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
70%
80%
90%
2013 2014 2015
Performance 85.6% 74.1% 79.4%
Mean 6.14 5.44 5.77
FACTOR 13 // Overall Learning
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 13 // 7©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q102 // Overall Evaluation // Regarding your experience at the nursing school, to what degree: Were youchallenged to do your best academic work?
A summary of Q102 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 57 5.84 1.18 -- -- -- -- 80.7%
Select 6 435 5.98 1.17 5.59 6.23 6/7 83.0%
Carnegie Class 807 6.05 1.28 5.34 7.00 17/24 84.2%
All Institutions 25,892 5.97 1.29 4.72 7.00 180/272 82.8%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 0.0% 1.8% 3.5% 5.3% 24.6% 28.1% 36.8%
Select 6 0.5% 1.1% 2.3% 7.1% 15.9% 31.0% 42.1%
Carnegie Class 1.2% 1.4% 2.4% 6.8% 13.4% 25.0% 49.8%
All Institutions 1.2% 1.6% 2.4% 8.0% 13.4% 27.8% 45.7%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
70%
80%
90%
2013 2014 2015
Performance 85.1% 75.5% 80.7%
Mean 6.11 5.53 5.84
FACTOR 13 // Overall Learning // Q102
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 13 // 8©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q103 // Overall Evaluation // Regarding your experience at the nursing school, to what degree: Were youmotivated to do your best academic work?
A summary of Q103 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 57 5.54 1.45 -- -- -- -- 75.7%
Select 6 433 5.75 1.37 4.98 6.14 6/7 79.2%
Carnegie Class 734 5.88 1.36 5.18 6.79 18/23 81.3%
All Institutions 25,682 5.84 1.39 4.43 6.79 209/270 80.7%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 1.8% 3.5% 3.5% 14.0% 14.0% 33.3% 29.8%
Select 6 0.9% 2.8% 4.8% 7.9% 15.0% 32.8% 35.8%
Carnegie Class 1.4% 1.9% 3.8% 9.0% 12.4% 29.5% 42.1%
All Institutions 1.8% 1.8% 3.3% 9.1% 13.9% 28.0% 42.2%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
60%
70%
80%
90%
2013 2014 2015
Performance 83.3% 65.9% 75.7%
Mean 6.00 4.95 5.54
FACTOR 13 // Overall Learning // Q103
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 13 // 9©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q104 // Overall Evaluation // Regarding your experience at the nursing school, to what degree: Was theinformation you learned applicable to your future career?
A summary of Q104 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 56 5.89 1.14 -- -- -- -- 81.5%
Select 6 427 6.11 1.04 5.87 6.50 6/7 85.2%
Carnegie Class 807 6.19 1.19 5.52 7.00 19/24 86.5%
All Institutions 25,595 6.11 1.17 4.81 7.00 206/271 85.2%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 0.0% 1.8% 1.8% 10.7% 10.7% 41.1% 33.9%
Select 6 0.0% 0.7% 1.9% 6.3% 11.9% 34.7% 44.5%
Carnegie Class 0.9% 1.2% 1.3% 6.7% 10.1% 26.2% 53.7%
All Institutions 0.6% 1.1% 1.7% 7.0% 11.9% 27.9% 49.9%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
80%
90%
2013 2014 2015
Performance 88.0% 80.6% 81.5%
Mean 6.28 5.84 5.89
FACTOR 13 // Overall Learning // Q104
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 13 // 10©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factors, a composite of scaled questions that explain a larger concept, are utilized in Skyfactor Benchworks’ reporting to reduce complexity andstrengthen the analysis. Benchworks provides an in-depth analysis of the factor, Overall Program Effectiveness, in this section of reports.
This factor is an overall measure of the indicator, Overall. If improving this indicator is a goal for your institution, actions should be targetedtoward the factors that are predictors of this indicator and their questions which are more tangible and more directly actionable.
Analysis for the scaled questions that compose this measure is provided in the section allowing for sufficient understanding. Through thisanalysis (i.e., current performance, and longitudinal trends), a thorough picture of the factor should emerge, however additional information canbe found in Skyfactor Benchworks’ Online Reports.
FACTOR COMPOSITION
Overall Program Effectiveness // Regarding your experience at the nursing school, to what degree:
Q100 // Would you recommend the nursing school to a close friend?
Q101 // Did the nursing school provide a positive academic experience?
Q102 // Were you challenged to do your best academic work?
Q103 // Were you motivated to do your best academic work?
Q104 // Was the information you learned applicable to your future career?
Overall Program Effectiveness //
Q105 // Comparing the expense to the quality of your education, rate the value of the investment made in your degree.
FACTOR 14 // Overall Program Effectiveness
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 14 // 1©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
There are many pieces of analysis that, when combined, create a comprehensive picture of your institution’s performance for this factor. The firstanalysis to examine is the current performance of the factor. This information, coupled with understanding of individual population perceptions,external benchmarks, longitudinal trends, individual scaled question performance, and other institutional information or assessment is invaluableto constructing an effective Action Plan for improvement.
Factor Performance // AggregateBelow is your institution's current performance for Overall Program Effectiveness and its scaled questions. While this factor might be difficult toimprove directly, improving its scaled questions will likely be easier and will result in an improvement in the factor.
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 14 // Overall Program Effectiveness 57 5.37 1.19 72.8%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR QUESTION PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Q104 // Was the information you learned applicable to your future career? 56 5.89 1.14 81.5%
Q102 // Were you challenged to do your best academic work? 57 5.84 1.18 80.7%
Q103 // Were you motivated to do your best academic work? 57 5.54 1.45 75.7%
Q105 // Comparing the expense to the quality of your education, rate the value of theinvestment made in your degree.
57 5.19 1.30 69.8%
Q101 // Did the nursing school provide a positive academic experience? 56 4.88 1.64 64.7%
Q100 // Would you recommend the nursing school to a close friend? 57 4.84 1.70 64.0%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 14 // Overall Program Effectiveness
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 14 // 2©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factor Performance // Key PopulationsKey categorical questions have been selected and are reported below. Answer options within each categorical question are divided into twogroups in order to facilitate a statistical testing of means; a designates the population which is statistically higher than the other population, a
designates the population that is statistically lower and an indicates that the populations have statistically equal factor means. Relativepopulation size (% Total) and Performance values for each group are plotted. To review this factor reported by all categorical questions and for allanswer options, please refer to the Online Reporting.
If this factor is included in your Action Plan, consider the behavior of these populations to determine if targeted interventions are needed.
WHAT IS YOUR GENDER?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
Female 50 5.43 1.21 73.8%
52 86.7% Male 7 4.98 0.87 66.3%
8 13.3% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
RACE/ETHNICITY (REPORTING ONLY)
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
White 55 5.33 1.19 72.2%
57 95% All others N/A 2 NR NR NR NR
3 5% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
HOW MANY YEARS OF FULL-TIME HEALTH RELATED WORK EXPERIENCE DID YOU HAVE PRIOR TO ENTERING THIS PROGRAM?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
One or more years of work experience 25 5.61 0.96 76.8%
27 45% Less than one year of work experience 32 5.18 1.31 69.7%
33 55% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
WHAT IS YOUR CUMULATIVE GPA?
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
3.00 GPA and higher 50 5.44 1.14 74.0%
53 89.8% Below 3.00 GPA 6 4.61 1.30 60.2%
6 10.2% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 14 // Overall Program Effectiveness
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 14 // 3©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
WHAT WAS YOUR SAT MATH+VERBAL OR ACT COMPOSITE SCORE? (HIGHEST SCORE IF YOU TOOK MULTIPLE TESTS)
N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN
STDDEV PERFORMANCE
SAT 1240 / ACT 27 and below 17 5.07 1.21 67.8%
17 70.8% SAT 1241 / ACT 28 and higher 6 4.97 1.09 66.2%
7 29.2% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 14 // Overall Program Effectiveness
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 14 // 4©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
Factor Performance // Degree ProgramIn this report, the institutional mean and a breakdown by Degree Program is provided. If this factor is included in your Action Plan, identify thepopulations reporting more positive experiences in order to examine if there are best practices that can be applied to populations reporting lesspositive experiences.
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Factor 14 // Overall Program Effectiveness 57 5.37 1.19 72.8%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR PERFORMANCE BY DEGREE PROGRAM
N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
RN-to-BSN (completed an RN) 12 5.83 1.21 80.5%
BSN, with no prior nursing experience or degree 43 5.27 1.17 71.2%
BSN, have completed other non-nursing degree(s) 2 NR NR NR NR
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 14 // Overall Program Effectiveness
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 14 // 5©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
In this report, Skyfactor Benchworks compares your institutional results to your Select 6, Carnegie Class, and all participating institutions for thefactor and its scaled questions. A designates where your institution’s mean is statistically higher than the comparative group; a designateswhere your institution’s mean is statistically lower than the comparative group; and designates where your institution’s mean is statisticallyequal to the comparative group. A ranking of your institution and the external benchmarking groups is also provided. If your institution’sperformance is below that of an external benchmarking group, use this information to motivate staff that higher performance is possible; but ifyour institutional performance is higher, celebrate!
FACTOR PERFORMANCE
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 57 5.37 1.19 -- -- -- -- 72.8%
Select 6 436 5.67 1.12 4.73 6.15 6/7 77.8%
Carnegie Class 815 5.85 1.21 4.90 6.89 20/24 80.8%
All Institutions 26,111 5.70 1.24 3.84 6.89 202/272 78.3%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR QUESTION PERFORMANCE
SELECT 6CARNEGIE
CLASSALL
INST. N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE
Q104 // Was the information you learnedapplicable to your future career?
56 5.89 1.14 81.5%
Q102 // Were you challenged to do your bestacademic work?
57 5.84 1.18 80.7%
Q103 // Were you motivated to do your bestacademic work?
57 5.54 1.45 75.7%
Q105 // Comparing the expense to the quality ofyour education, rate the value of the investmentmade in your degree.
57 5.19 1.30 69.8%
Q101 // Did the nursing school provide a positiveacademic experience?
56 4.88 1.64 64.7%
Q100 // Would you recommend the nursing schoolto a close friend?
57 4.84 1.70 64.0%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
FACTOR 14 // Overall Program Effectiveness
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 14 // 6©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS
The final analysis for the factor is its performance over time. Longitudinal trends support continuous improvement and are the key to evaluatingthe success of your institution’s action plan for this factor. If your institution’s current performance falls short of expectations, review the actionsconducted and make adjustments.
If your institution participated in two or more iterations of this assessment, a longitudinal trend is plotted. If your institution did not participatecontinuously, Skyfactor extrapolated between successive iterations. A designates years where your institution performs statistically higherthan the current year; a designates years where your program is statistically lower in performance; and a represents years that arestatistically equal to the current year.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
60%
70%
80%
90%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 70.5% 68.0% 81.1% 62.3% 72.9%
Mean 5.23 5.08 5.86 4.74 5.37
FACTOR 14 // Overall Program Effectiveness
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 14 // 7©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q100 // Overall Evaluation // Regarding your experience at the nursing school, to what degree: Would yourecommend the nursing school to a close friend?
A summary of Q100 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 57 4.84 1.70 -- -- -- -- 64.0%
Select 6 435 5.47 1.65 3.73 6.23 6/7 74.5%
Carnegie Class 812 5.70 1.65 4.22 6.86 21/24 78.3%
All Institutions 25,905 5.48 1.72 2.57 6.94 215/271 74.7%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 5.3% 5.3% 10.5% 19.3% 17.5% 22.8% 19.3%
Select 6 3.4% 3.9% 6.9% 10.1% 13.6% 27.6% 34.5%
Carnegie Class 4.3% 2.9% 4.6% 10.8% 11.4% 22.4% 43.6%
All Institutions 4.8% 4.0% 4.7% 10.8% 14.2% 23.8% 37.6%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 75.0% 68.4% 77.0% 45.1% 64.0%
Mean 5.50 5.11 5.62 3.71 4.84
FACTOR 14 // Overall Program Effectiveness // Q100
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 14 // 8©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q101 // Overall Evaluation // Regarding your experience at the nursing school, to what degree: Did thenursing school provide a positive academic experience?
A summary of Q101 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 56 4.88 1.64 -- -- -- -- 64.7%
Select 6 434 5.57 1.43 4.16 6.30 6/7 76.2%
Carnegie Class 809 5.76 1.47 4.52 6.86 21/24 79.3%
All Institutions 25,818 5.53 1.58 3.14 6.86 222/270 75.5%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 5.4% 3.6% 8.9% 21.4% 19.6% 23.2% 17.9%
Select 6 1.2% 3.2% 5.3% 11.8% 17.3% 29.3% 32.0%
Carnegie Class 2.1% 2.5% 4.9% 11.0% 12.9% 26.5% 40.1%
All Institutions 3.0% 3.6% 5.0% 11.1% 15.5% 27.4% 34.5%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
2013 2014 2015
Performance 76.6% 50.0% 64.6%
Mean 5.59 4.00 4.88
FACTOR 14 // Overall Program Effectiveness // Q101
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 14 // 9©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q102 // Overall Evaluation // Regarding your experience at the nursing school, to what degree: Were youchallenged to do your best academic work?
A summary of Q102 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 57 5.84 1.18 -- -- -- -- 80.7%
Select 6 435 5.98 1.17 5.59 6.23 6/7 83.0%
Carnegie Class 807 6.05 1.28 5.34 7.00 17/24 84.2%
All Institutions 25,892 5.97 1.29 4.72 7.00 180/272 82.8%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 0.0% 1.8% 3.5% 5.3% 24.6% 28.1% 36.8%
Select 6 0.5% 1.1% 2.3% 7.1% 15.9% 31.0% 42.1%
Carnegie Class 1.2% 1.4% 2.4% 6.8% 13.4% 25.0% 49.8%
All Institutions 1.2% 1.6% 2.4% 8.0% 13.4% 27.8% 45.7%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
70%
80%
90%
2013 2014 2015
Performance 85.1% 75.5% 80.7%
Mean 6.11 5.53 5.84
FACTOR 14 // Overall Program Effectiveness // Q102
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 14 // 10©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q103 // Overall Evaluation // Regarding your experience at the nursing school, to what degree: Were youmotivated to do your best academic work?
A summary of Q103 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 57 5.54 1.45 -- -- -- -- 75.7%
Select 6 433 5.75 1.37 4.98 6.14 6/7 79.2%
Carnegie Class 734 5.88 1.36 5.18 6.79 18/23 81.3%
All Institutions 25,682 5.84 1.39 4.43 6.79 209/270 80.7%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 1.8% 3.5% 3.5% 14.0% 14.0% 33.3% 29.8%
Select 6 0.9% 2.8% 4.8% 7.9% 15.0% 32.8% 35.8%
Carnegie Class 1.4% 1.9% 3.8% 9.0% 12.4% 29.5% 42.1%
All Institutions 1.8% 1.8% 3.3% 9.1% 13.9% 28.0% 42.2%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
60%
70%
80%
90%
2013 2014 2015
Performance 83.3% 65.9% 75.7%
Mean 6.00 4.95 5.54
FACTOR 14 // Overall Program Effectiveness // Q103
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 14 // 11©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q104 // Overall Evaluation // Regarding your experience at the nursing school, to what degree: Was theinformation you learned applicable to your future career?
A summary of Q104 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 56 5.89 1.14 -- -- -- -- 81.5%
Select 6 427 6.11 1.04 5.87 6.50 6/7 85.2%
Carnegie Class 807 6.19 1.19 5.52 7.00 19/24 86.5%
All Institutions 25,595 6.11 1.17 4.81 7.00 206/271 85.2%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 0.0% 1.8% 1.8% 10.7% 10.7% 41.1% 33.9%
Select 6 0.0% 0.7% 1.9% 6.3% 11.9% 34.7% 44.5%
Carnegie Class 0.9% 1.2% 1.3% 6.7% 10.1% 26.2% 53.7%
All Institutions 0.6% 1.1% 1.7% 7.0% 11.9% 27.9% 49.9%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
80%
90%
2013 2014 2015
Performance 88.0% 80.6% 81.5%
Mean 6.28 5.84 5.89
FACTOR 14 // Overall Program Effectiveness // Q104
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 14 // 12©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q105 // Overall Evaluation Comparing the expense to the quality of your education, rate the value of theinvestment made in your degree.
A summary of Q105 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 57 5.19 1.30 -- -- -- -- 69.8%
Select 6 436 5.13 1.36 4.11 5.70 4/7 68.8%
Carnegie Class 806 5.51 1.45 4.11 6.86 16/24 75.2%
All Institutions 24,334 5.24 1.48 3.05 6.86 155/270 70.7%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
VERY POOR ------------------------------------- GOOD ------------------------------------- EXCEPTIONAL
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 1.8% 1.8% 5.3% 15.8% 35.1% 22.8% 17.5%
Select 6 1.1% 2.5% 9.2% 17.4% 24.1% 30.3% 15.4%
Carnegie Class 1.3% 2.1% 6.7% 14.7% 18.0% 25.8% 31.4%
All Institutions 1.7% 3.2% 8.8% 14.7% 21.4% 27.8% 22.4%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
50%
60%
70%
80%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 66.0% 67.5% 76.1% 56.2% 69.9%
Mean 4.96 5.05 5.57 4.37 5.19
FACTOR 14 // Overall Program Effectiveness // Q105
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 14 // 13©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q027 // To what degree: Are you experiencing stress regarding paying off your student loans
A summary of Q027 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 46 3.26 1.89 -- -- -- -- 37.7%
Select 6 327 3.46 1.86 3.00 3.82 4/6 41.0%
Carnegie Class 484 3.51 1.78 3.00 4.67 11/18 41.8%
All Institutions 13,102 3.37 1.88 1.57 5.12 120/202 39.5%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
EXTREMELY ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- NOT AT ALL
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 28.3% 13.0% 10.9% 19.6% 13.0% 10.9% 4.3%
Select 6 19.3% 17.1% 14.7% 21.1% 11.3% 8.3% 8.3%
Carnegie Class 20.0% 12.1% 13.8% 29.1% 10.2% 7.7% 7.2%
All Institutions 23.2% 14.1% 13.1% 25.0% 8.9% 7.6% 8.1%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
30%
40%
2014 2015
Performance 34.5% 37.7%
Mean 3.07 3.26
Non-Factor Questions // Q027
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Non-Factor Questions // 1©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q028 // To what degree: Do you anticipate problems making your student loan payments
A summary of Q028 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 46 4.67 1.78 -- -- -- -- 61.2%
Select 6 325 4.93 1.72 4.32 5.74 4/6 65.5%
Carnegie Class 484 5.06 1.66 4.25 6.33 13/18 67.7%
All Institutions 13,101 4.89 1.76 3.12 6.33 145/202 64.8%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
EXTREMELY ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- NOT AT ALL
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 8.7% 2.2% 10.9% 28.3% 10.9% 19.6% 19.6%
Select 6 5.2% 5.8% 7.4% 20.9% 13.5% 26.8% 20.3%
Carnegie Class 5.1% 3.8% 6.0% 22.6% 17.9% 20.4% 24.2%
All Institutions 6.2% 5.4% 7.7% 21.0% 15.9% 21.7% 22.1%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
60%
70%
2014 2015
Performance 60.8% 61.2%
Mean 4.65 4.67
Non-Factor Questions // Q028
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Non-Factor Questions // 2©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q036 // Quality of Nursing Instruction // Rate the quality of the BSN program regarding: Extent to which yoursenior clinical experience built on the foundation laid in previous nursing courses
A summary of Q036 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 56 5.25 1.54 -- -- -- -- 70.8%
Select 6 431 5.50 1.29 5.17 6.08 5/7 75.0%
Carnegie Class 736 5.30 1.44 3.98 6.67 13/23 71.7%
All Institutions 24,929 5.37 1.39 3.14 6.75 167/269 72.8%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
VERY POOR ------------------------------------- GOOD ------------------------------------- EXCEPTIONAL
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 3.6% 1.8% 7.1% 17.9% 16.1% 30.4% 23.2%
Select 6 0.5% 0.7% 6.5% 14.8% 23.0% 27.1% 27.4%
Carnegie Class 2.3% 2.4% 6.2% 15.8% 21.1% 30.1% 22.2%
All Institutions 1.2% 2.3% 6.5% 15.5% 21.2% 29.0% 24.3%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
60%
70%
80%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 76.0% 69.8% 67.1% 67.4% 70.8%
Mean 5.56 5.19 5.03 5.05 5.25
Non-Factor Questions // Q036
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Non-Factor Questions // 3©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q093 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Delegate nursing care while retaining accountability
A summary of Q093 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 55 5.45 1.35 -- -- -- -- 74.2%
Select 6 423 5.77 1.25 5.45 6.26 7/7 79.5%
Carnegie Class 790 5.88 1.28 5.00 7.00 21/24 81.3%
All Institutions 25,327 5.70 1.31 4.63 7.00 203/271 78.3%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 0.0% 1.8% 7.3% 16.4% 21.8% 23.6% 29.1%
Select 6 0.9% 2.1% 2.8% 7.1% 18.2% 37.8% 31.0%
Carnegie Class 1.1% 1.4% 3.0% 9.1% 16.1% 30.2% 39.2%
All Institutions 1.1% 1.8% 3.4% 11.1% 17.2% 33.2% 32.2%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
70%
80%
90%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Performance 75.9% 80.1% 79.5% 73.0% 74.2%
Mean 5.56 5.81 5.77 5.38 5.45
Non-Factor Questions // Q093
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Non-Factor Questions // 4©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q095 // Online Environment // To what degree did the online course/technology provide: Easy-to-usesoftware
A summary of Q095 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 35 5.26 1.46 -- -- -- -- 71.0%
Select 6 265 5.39 1.20 4.76 5.69 4/6 73.2%
Carnegie Class 368 5.48 1.29 4.29 6.75 9/15 74.7%
All Institutions 12,995 5.55 1.38 3.69 6.75 131/190 75.8%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 2.9% 2.9% 5.7% 14.3% 22.9% 31.4% 20.0%
Select 6 0.4% 0.8% 3.8% 21.5% 21.1% 33.2% 19.2%
Carnegie Class 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 18.1% 20.6% 30.8% 24.6%
All Institutions 1.3% 2.1% 3.8% 15.7% 16.9% 30.4% 29.8%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
60%
70%
80%
2014 2015
Performance 68.5% 71.0%
Mean 5.11 5.26
Non-Factor Questions // Q095
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Non-Factor Questions // 5©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q096 // Online Environment // To what degree did the online course/technology provide: Software that wasfunctional
A summary of Q096 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 35 5.46 1.23 -- -- -- -- 74.3%
Select 6 264 5.35 1.18 4.68 5.66 3/6 72.5%
Carnegie Class 366 5.44 1.28 4.43 6.75 9/15 74.0%
All Institutions 12,936 5.52 1.36 3.67 6.75 99/190 75.3%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 0.0% 2.9% 2.9% 14.3% 28.6% 28.6% 22.9%
Select 6 0.4% 1.5% 3.4% 18.9% 25.0% 34.5% 16.3%
Carnegie Class 0.5% 2.2% 3.2% 17.5% 23.2% 29.9% 23.4%
All Institutions 1.0% 2.3% 4.3% 15.5% 18.3% 30.6% 28.1%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
60%
70%
80%
2014 2015
Performance 69.4% 74.3%
Mean 5.17 5.46
Non-Factor Questions // Q096
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Non-Factor Questions // 6©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q097 // Online Environment // To what degree did the online course/technology provide: Interaction betweenyou and your instructor
A summary of Q097 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 35 5.54 1.34 -- -- -- -- 75.7%
Select 6 268 5.29 1.36 4.52 5.71 4/7 71.5%
Carnegie Class 367 5.43 1.52 4.42 7.00 10/16 73.8%
All Institutions 13,085 5.40 1.48 3.87 7.00 76/191 73.3%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 0.0% 2.9% 5.7% 17.1% 8.6% 40.0% 25.7%
Select 6 1.9% 1.9% 5.6% 16.0% 24.6% 31.0% 19.0%
Carnegie Class 2.0% 4.2% 4.0% 14.7% 17.7% 27.9% 29.6%
All Institutions 1.5% 3.7% 5.5% 16.0% 17.4% 27.6% 28.3%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
60%
70%
80%
2014 2015
Performance 63.5% 75.7%
Mean 4.81 5.54
Non-Factor Questions // Q097
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Non-Factor Questions // 7©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Q098 // Online Environment // To what degree did the online course/technology provide: Interaction amongclassmates
A summary of Q098 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.
A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.
EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING
N MEANSTDDEV
MEAN RANGE
RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE
Your Institution 34 5.29 1.32 -- -- -- -- 71.5%
Select 6 265 5.27 1.40 4.60 5.65 4/7 71.2%
Carnegie Class 367 5.43 1.51 4.46 7.00 11/16 73.8%
All Institutions 12,967 5.44 1.47 2.54 7.00 106/190 74.0%
0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%
Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.
ANSWER FREQUENCY
NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY
1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //
Your Institution 0.0% 2.9% 8.8% 14.7% 20.6% 35.3% 17.6%
Select 6 2.3% 2.3% 6.8% 13.2% 24.5% 32.1% 18.9%
Carnegie Class 2.0% 3.7% 4.2% 16.0% 17.0% 29.2% 27.9%
All Institutions 1.7% 2.9% 5.0% 16.2% 17.3% 27.8% 29.1%
0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%
A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.
LONGITUDINAL TREND
50%
60%
70%
80%
2014 2015
Performance 59.9% 71.6%
Mean 4.59 5.29
Non-Factor Questions // Q098
Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation
2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Non-Factor Questions // 8©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission
Recommended