Hanoi, January 27th 2015 Enrico Weber DEI – Politecnico di Milano IMRR Project INTEGRATED AND...

Preview:

Citation preview

Hanoi, January 27th 2015

Enrico WeberDEI – Politecnico di Milano

IMRR ProjectINTEGRATED AND SUSTAINABLE WATER MANAGEMENT OF

RED-THAI BINH RIVER SYSTEMIN A CHANGING CLIMATE

3. Indicators and criteria   

IMRR phases

econnaissance

odeling the system

ndicators identification

cenarios definition

lternative design

valuation

RMISAE

• Identification of 24 indicators, related to 5 sectors of interest

• Validation over different time horizons

omparisonC2

3

Evaluation Hierarchy

Who (and how) is affected by the changes in the sytem? Which kind of criteria are used to evaluate the effects?

Water supply

Rice fields in Ninh Binh

Criteria: Satisfy water needs in order to ensure agricultural production and guarantee other water uses 4

Water supply

1. Experts’ knowledge

How to assess the water shortage?

Reference threshold (2010): 2.3 m at Long Bien, Hanoi

Estimation of real deficit

5

2. Delta hydraulic model

Water supply

1. Reference threshold, identified trough expert knowledge and MARD regulations:

6

Water supply

1. Reference threshold, identified trough expert knowledge and MARD regulations:

"In 2009-2010 dry season the reference threshold for water supply in the Delta was 2.3 meter at Long Bien Station, Hanoi“

(MARD release plan)

Indicator formulation, from IMRR wiki website:

7

Water supply

1. Reference threshold, identified trough expert knowledge and MARD regulations:

"In 2009-2010 dry season the reference threshold for water supply in the Delta was 2.3 meter at Long Bien Station, Hanoi“

(MARD release plan)

Indicator formulation, from IMRR wiki website:

8

Water supply

2. Hydraulic model of the Delta Region: simulation of the canal network and of the intake points behavior, in order to get a measurement of the daily water deficit.

4200 km river and canals network 11 Irrigation Districts 88 Sluice gates 302 district pumps 160 river pumps

9

MIKE11

All the water uses in the Delta are accounted in the water demand computation, done for each irrigation district on a decadic basis

Water uses: all districts in Delta

IrrigationAquacultureUrban and IndustriesDomestic water for rural areaWater for livestockWater for environment

Water supply

10

Water supplyNHUE DD TN

VB TL AKH

BD BHH NTB

BTB NND Water needs are represented trough the water demand for each pump 11

Water supplyNHUE DD TN

VB TL AKH

BD BHH NTB

BTB NND

12

Aggregated water demand for each irrigation district

Water supply

NH

UE

DD

TN

VB TL

AK

H

BD

BH

H

NT

B

BT

B

NN

D

1995

2000

2005

2010

Annual volume of deficit for each district

14

Water supplySpatial distribution of water deficit in 2010

15

Flood control

Criteria: Minimize flood damages at Hanoi and all over the Delta region

Long Bien, Hanoi

16

Flood controlRequirements for the indicators: risk-aversion: focus

on the flood peak consider also

damages in the flood plains

consider both magnitude and duration of the floods

13.10 – 300 years r.t.Main dyke system

Official thresholds

13.40 – 500 years r.t.Hanoi city

17

Flood controlRequirements for the indicators: risk-aversion: focus

on the flood peak consider also

damages in the flood plains

consider both magnitude and duration of the floods

• 125 flood plains, located along 14 rivers

• ~ 1000000 inhabitants• stage-damage

relationship estimation

Flood plain study (IWRP)

18

Flood controlRequirements for the indicators: • risk-aversion: focus on the flood peak• consider also damages in the flood plains• consider both magnitude and duration of the floods

125 flood plains, located along 14 rivers1000000 inhabitants

Flood plain study (IWRP)Sum of damages in Flood Plains

19

Flood controlRequirements for the indicators: • risk-aversion: focus on the flood peak• consider also damages in the flood plains• consider both magnitude and duration of the floods

125 flood plains, located along 14 rivers1000000 inhabitants

Flood plain study (IWRP)Sum of damages in Flood Plains

20

Flood controlRequirements for the indicators: risk-aversion: focus

on the flood peak consider also

damages in the flood plains

consider both magnitude and duration of the floods

• damage to structures • damage to economic

activities

Criteria considered

21

Flood control

23

damages in Flood Plain

13.10: exceedance of the main dyke system, except Hanoi city

13.40: damages also inside Hanoi city

Flood control

25iFl:1 iFl:7 iFl:8

1971

Other indicators: iFl:2 = Maximum water level in Hanoi over

the time horizon iFl:3 = number of occurrence of Day dam

opening iFl:5 = Yearly average number of day with

floods (h_HN >11.5) iFl:6 = Maximum duration of a flood event

over the time horizon [days]

Flood control

26

Hydropower

Criteria: Minimize the deficit of energy from the Red River Plants, especially in the periods in which the thermal production is higher

Son La dam

27

HydropowerOutcomes of sector meeting with EVN: Value of production depends from the period, being higher

during dry season, when the production relies most on thermal power.

28

Navigation

Criteria: Minimize navigation interruptionMinimize dredging costs

32

Navigation

Outcomes of sector meeting with MoIT: Navigation threshold is fixed at 1.1 m at Long Bien

Station, accordig to (Decision 1708/DTND-QLHT issued by

Vietnam Inland Waterways Administration, 2009) Water levels in Hanoi below 0.4 m, force the complete

stop of navigation on the Red River Water levels above 11.5 m do not let boats and ships

pass the Duong Bridge Dredging intervention have been performed in the past

when water level falled below 1.1 m at Long Bien.

33

Navigation

Other Indicators:

iN:3= Yearly average number of days in which the water level at Long Bien station in Hanoi is lower than total interruption threshold [days]

iN:4= Yearly average number of days in which the water level at Long Bien station in Hanoi on the Red River is above the navigation upper threshold [days]

iN:5= Dredging costs: yearly average of daily deficit respect to the navigation threshold

35

Navigation

36 iN:1 iN:2 iN:3 iN:4 iN:5

River Environment

Criteria: Preserve and improve river environment quality

37

In the dry season every hydraulic structure has to release, or let flow downstream of it, a minimum water flow that corresponds to the flow that is overcome the 90% of the time(Q90%) in the dry season, in order to protect the ecological environment (’National technical regulation on hydraulic structures’ (QCVN 04-05:2012/BNNPTNT, MARD)

River Environment

Hoa Binh

Tuyen Quang

Thac Ba

38

River Environment

39

MIKE11

1994-2010 Mike 11 simulation with unregulated flow as inputs

Unregulated (or “natural”) time series of

flows at Son Tay

River Environment

40

Q90%

River Environment

41

River Environment

historicalunregulated

43

44

River Environment

2002-2004

River Environment

historicalunregulated

45

River Environment

Historical streamflow at Son Tay

Unr

egul

ated

str

eam

flow

at

Son

Tay

Higher values in the flood season

46

River Environment

Lower flows in the dry season

47

Thanks for your attention

XIN CẢM ƠN

48

Water supplyDifferent results using different deficit-based indicators,

49

Water supply

50

Water supply

1 Expert Based 2. Model based

Strength - Simple and immediate, - always computable,

Suitable for general use, embed parameters of water demandAllow to represent spatial distribution of deficit

Weakness -Depends upon the actual situation, can not be referred to future- does not give enough information on localization and magnitude of deficifs

Need to run simulation of the internal situation of each canal

51

Flood control

52

River Environment

53

River Environment

Lower flows in the dry season

54

River Environment

55

River Environment

56

River Environment

57

Hydropower

58

GW

h

Hydropower

59

GW

h

0.150.070.010.850.16River envir.

Hydropower

Irrigation

Lake envir.

Floods

0.700.800.660.150.83

0.590.750.860.000.61

0.480.160.140.670.26

0.660.700.550.220.12

A54…A4A2A1A0

AlternativesIn

de

xes

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

upstr.envir. downstr. envir. hydropower irrigation lake flood

uti

lity

A0 A0 A0

Lake envir.

River envir.

Hydropower

Irrigation

Floods

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

upstr.envir. downstr. envir. hydropower irrigation lake flood

uti

lity

A0 A0 A26

Lake envir.

River envir.

Hydropower

Irrigation

Floods

Value matrixPareto Race

excessive loss in irrigation

reasonable alternative

A0 no actions0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

upstr.envir. downstr. envir. hydropower irrigation lake flood

uti

lity

A0 A36 A26

Lake envir.

River envir.

Hydropower

Irrigation

Floods

going on ...

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

Lake envir. River envir. Hydropower Irrigation Floods

uti

lity

A0 A36 A34

Recommended