FP6 FP7 ICT - it.ac.me 5b.pdf · Microsoft PowerPoint - Prezentacija 5b.ppt Author: Korisnik...

Examples of badly written proposals

Examples from FP6 – IST and FP7‐ICT

Roadshow no.1 at IT Conference, Zabljak 2

Outline of Module

• A STREP proposal to the second IST call of FP6 2003

• A STREP proposal to the first ICT call of FP7 2007

Roadshow no.1 at IT Conference, Zabljak 3

A STREP proposalto the second IST call of FP6 

2003

Roadshow no.1 at IT Conference, Zabljak 4

Evaluation Criteria

1. Relevance (threshold score 3 out of 5)2. Potential impact (threshold score 3 out of 5)3. S&T excellence (threshold score 4 out of 5)4. Quality of the consortium (threshold score 3 out of 

5)5. Quality of the management (threshold score 3 out 

of 5)6. Mobilisation of resources (threshold score 3 out of 

5)Overall threshold score 21 out of 30.

Roadshow no.1 at IT Conference, Zabljak 5

Criteria 2: Potential Impact

Table of Contents of Proposal

Roadshow no.1 at IT Conference, Zabljak 6

Exploitation Plan

This is everything !+ :

Roadshow no.1 at IT Conference, Zabljak 7

Criteria 3: S&T Excellence

Roadshow no.1 at IT Conference, Zabljak 8

Objectives

Evaluation Result:

Roadshow no.1 at IT Conference, Zabljak 9

State of the Art

Roadshow no.1 at IT Conference, Zabljak 10

Details of Test Cases

Evaluation Result:…”Details of test cases are missing”….

Roadshow no.1 at IT Conference, Zabljak 11

Criteria 4: Quality of the consortium

Roadshow no.1 at IT Conference, Zabljak 12

Roles of Partners

Design and Implementation

Roadshow no.1 at IT Conference, Zabljak 13

Overall Evaluation Result

Roadshow no.1 at IT Conference, Zabljak 14

A STREP proposalto the first ICT call of FP7

2007

Evaluation Results

Roadshow no.1 at IT Conference, Zabljak 15

S&T Excellence

Good and innovative idea, but not well planned in terms of partnership and workplan

Roadshow no.1 at IT Conference, Zabljak 16

Implementation and Management

Roadshow no.1 at IT Conference, Zabljak 17

Impact and Overall Conclusion

Roadshow no.1 at IT Conference, Zabljak 18

Conclusion: What can we learn ?

• Consider carefully the evaluation criteria

• Provide sufficient and concrete detail

• Nothing should remain vague

• The individual parts of the proposal are linked:objectives – work plan – competence and capability of the consortium – state of art

• This is valid not only for the whole proposal, but also for parts of it that are written by different people

Roadshow no.1 at IT Conference, Zabljak 19

CONTACT

Thank you for your attention!

Enis KočanUniversity of Montenegro

Faculty of Electrical Engineering

enisk@ac.me