Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Examples of badly written proposals
Examples from FP6 – IST and FP7‐ICT
Roadshow no.1 at IT Conference, Zabljak 2
Outline of Module
• A STREP proposal to the second IST call of FP6 2003
• A STREP proposal to the first ICT call of FP7 2007
Roadshow no.1 at IT Conference, Zabljak 3
A STREP proposalto the second IST call of FP6
2003
Roadshow no.1 at IT Conference, Zabljak 4
Evaluation Criteria
1. Relevance (threshold score 3 out of 5)2. Potential impact (threshold score 3 out of 5)3. S&T excellence (threshold score 4 out of 5)4. Quality of the consortium (threshold score 3 out of
5)5. Quality of the management (threshold score 3 out
of 5)6. Mobilisation of resources (threshold score 3 out of
5)Overall threshold score 21 out of 30.
Roadshow no.1 at IT Conference, Zabljak 5
Criteria 2: Potential Impact
Table of Contents of Proposal
Roadshow no.1 at IT Conference, Zabljak 6
Exploitation Plan
This is everything !+ :
Roadshow no.1 at IT Conference, Zabljak 7
Criteria 3: S&T Excellence
Roadshow no.1 at IT Conference, Zabljak 8
Objectives
Evaluation Result:
Roadshow no.1 at IT Conference, Zabljak 9
State of the Art
Roadshow no.1 at IT Conference, Zabljak 10
Details of Test Cases
Evaluation Result:…”Details of test cases are missing”….
Roadshow no.1 at IT Conference, Zabljak 11
Criteria 4: Quality of the consortium
Roadshow no.1 at IT Conference, Zabljak 12
Roles of Partners
Design and Implementation
Roadshow no.1 at IT Conference, Zabljak 13
Overall Evaluation Result
Roadshow no.1 at IT Conference, Zabljak 14
A STREP proposalto the first ICT call of FP7
2007
Evaluation Results
Roadshow no.1 at IT Conference, Zabljak 15
S&T Excellence
Good and innovative idea, but not well planned in terms of partnership and workplan
Roadshow no.1 at IT Conference, Zabljak 16
Implementation and Management
Roadshow no.1 at IT Conference, Zabljak 17
Impact and Overall Conclusion
Roadshow no.1 at IT Conference, Zabljak 18
Conclusion: What can we learn ?
• Consider carefully the evaluation criteria
• Provide sufficient and concrete detail
• Nothing should remain vague
• The individual parts of the proposal are linked:objectives – work plan – competence and capability of the consortium – state of art
• This is valid not only for the whole proposal, but also for parts of it that are written by different people
Roadshow no.1 at IT Conference, Zabljak 19
CONTACT
Thank you for your attention!
Enis KočanUniversity of Montenegro
Faculty of Electrical Engineering
