View
2
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
EDM and CPV in the EDM and CPV in the ττττττττ systemsystem
Gabriel González SprinbergInstituto de Física, Facultad de Ciencias
Montevideo Uruguay
gabrielg@fisica.edu.uy
DIF06 INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati
OutlineOutline
1. Electric Dipole Moment
1.1 Definition
B = γγγγ, Z, g, …f = e, µµµµ, ττττ, ..., b, t
1.2 Experiments
2. Observables
2.1 High energies2.2 Low energies
3. Conclusions
B
fd
1. EDM 1. EDM 1.1Definition1.1Definition
P and T-odd interaction of a fermionwith gauge fields:Classical electromagnetismOrdinary quantum mechanics
Relativistic quantum mechanics: Dirac equation
Non-relativistic limit:
sdρρ
=d,Edρρ
⋅−=EDMH
( ) 5( )
2
iH i eA m d Fµυ
µυγ σ/= Ψ ∂/ + − Ψ + Ψ Ψ
Edρρ
⋅−=→ EDMHH
EDM LANDAU 1957 T , P odd interactions
In QFT: CPT Invariance
EDMEDM HH −→
SYMMETRIES: Time reversal T, Parity PBesides, chirality flip (some insight into the mass origin)
tt −→ ,EE:ρρ
→ ssρρ
−→
1. EDM 1. EDM 1.1Definition1.1Definition
CP ≈ T
SM : • vertex corrections
• at least 4-loops
Beyond SM: • one loop effect (SUSY,2HDM,...)
• dimension six effective operator
EDM
γγγγ
ττττττττ
1. EDM 1. EDM 1.1Definition1.1Definition
SM :
V V*
E.P.Shabalin ’78
We need 3-loops for a quark-EDM, and 4 loops for a lepton...
J.F.Donoghue ’78I.B.Khriplovich,M.E.Pospelov ‘90A.Czarnecki,B.Krause ‘97
1. EDM 1. EDM 1.1Definition1.1Definition
= 0 !!!
Fermion of mass mf generated by physics atΛΛΛΛ−−−− scale has
EDM mf/ΛΛΛΛ2222
T-odd ττττ−−−−EDM has particular interest anddepends on the underlying physics of CP violation
≈
1. EDM 1. EDM 1.1Definition1.1Definition
Effective Lagrangian:
CPV:
Operators:
Other operators:
1. EDM 1. EDM 1.1Definition1.1Definition
More sensitivity
HIGH ENERGY (Z-peak) LOW ENERGY
ττττ ττττττττ ττττ
WEDM EDM
ΖΖΖΖ γγγγ
1. EDM 1. EDM 1.1Definition1.1Definition
V = γ, Ζγ, Ζγ, Ζγ, Ζ
For q2=0 EDM GAUGE INVARIANT
OBSERVABLE QUANTITIES
q2=MZ2 WEDM
Beyond SM EDM: Loop calculations
5 2 5 2
5( , ) ( ) ( )
V Vp p ie a q q d q
µ µ µννγ γ σ γ− +
Γ = +
1. EDM 1. EDM 1.1Definition1.1Definition
dττττγγγγ
Zd ττττ
PDG ’06 95% CL
EDM BELLE ‘02
WEDM ALEPH 1990-95 LEP runs
1. EDM 1. EDM 1.2 Experiments1.2 Experiments
170 50 10
−≤ ×ZRe(d ) . ecmττττ
171 1 10
−≤ ×ZIm(d ) . ecmττττ
162 2 0 45 10
−− ×Re(d ) : ( . to . ) e cmττττ
γγγγ
160 25 0 008 10
−− ×Im(d ) : ( . to . ) ecmττττ
γγγγ
For other fermions….
1. EDM 1. EDM 1.2 Experiments1.2 Experiments
260 069 0 074 10
−= ± ×ed ( . . ) e cmγγγγ
193 7 3 4 10
−= ± ×d ( . . ) e cmµµµµ
γγγγ
250 63 10 90
−< ×nd . e cm, % CLγγγγ
SM for EDM is well below within present experimental limits:
CKM 3-loopsSM prediction
CKM 4-loops
Hopefullyin the SM
…15 orders of magnitude below experiments...
2. Observables2. Observables
32 3410 10
− −≈ −qd ecmγγγγ
3810
−≈ed ecmγγγγ
33 3410 10
− −≈ ≈ −e
e
md d ecm
mττττ ττττγ γγ γγ γγ γ
Currents limits on electron EDM gives:
However, in many models the EDM do not necessarily scale as the first power of the masses.
Multihiggs models 1-loop contributionsVectorlike leptons
EDM scale as the cube of the mass!
BSM ττττ-EDM can go up to 10-19 e cm
2. Observables2. Observables
242 4 10
−< ×d . ecmττττ
γγγγ
2. Observables2. Observables
2≈
md eττττ ττττ
γγγγΛΛΛΛ
Non-vanishing signal in a ττττ−−−−EDM observable
NEW PHYSICS
One expects: special interest in heavy flavours
ττττ−−−−EDM: In order to be able to measure a genuine non-vanishing signal one has to deal with a -observable CP
2. Observables 2. Observables 2.1 High energies2.1 High energies
Indirect arguments:
any other physics may also contribute…
Look for , linear effects
Genuine CPV observables in ττττ–pair production:
SPIN TERMS and/or SPIN CORRELATIONS
+ − + −
+ −
→
→
(e e )
(Z )
∆σ τ τ∆σ τ τ∆σ τ τ∆σ τ τ
∆Γ τ τ∆Γ τ τ∆Γ τ τ∆Γ τ τ
2
≈ Zdττττ
CPP
2. Observables 2. Observables 2.1 High energies2.1 High energies
Spin terms angular distribution of decay products
• Asymmetries in the decay products• Expectation values of tensor observables
CP :
2. Observables 2. Observables 2.1 High energies2.1 High energies
x: Transverse y: Normal z: Longitudinal
2. Observables 2. Observables 2.1 High energies2.1 High energies
Tensor observables:
Z-peak:
W.Bernreuther,O.Nachtmann ‘89
Normal polarization:
(and needs helicity-flip)
Genuine CPV if
J.Bernabeu,GGS,J.Vidal ‘93
+ − + −= − × + ↔ij i jT (q q ) (q q ) (i j)
±ττττ±
±(q )ππππ
νννν
≈ Zij ij Z
mT c
edsππππππππ
ππππππππ
ττττ
↔ − −NP T odd, P evenττττ
+ −
↔N NP Pτ ττ ττ ττ τ
2. Observables 2. Observables 2.1 High energies2.1 High energies
EDM (and ) is proportional to angular asymmetries,to extract sinθθθθττττ cosθθθθτ τ τ τ sinφφφφh
(more details latter..)
One can measure for and/or
1
2
+ −≡ +CPVA (A A )
NP ττττ
A +ττττ−ττττ
CP :
+ −
+ −
−=
+A
σ σσ σσ σσ σ
σ σσ σσ σσ σ
2 2 22 + + ∝N
ZP sin v (v a ) ma cose
dτττττ τ ττ τ ττ τ ττ τ τ
ττττ
γβ θ β θγβ θ β θγβ θ β θγβ θ β θ
2. Observables 2. Observables 2.2 Low energies2.2 Low energies
Diagrams:
+ − + −+ −→ →e e , (s ) (s )γ ϒ τ τγ ϒ τ τγ ϒ τ τγ ϒ τ τ
d ττττ
γγγγ
d ττττ
γγγγ
2. Observables 2. Observables 2.2 Low energies2.2 Low energies
What about the linear terms?
Interference with the axial part of Z-exchange, suppressed by q2/MZ
2
J.Bernabeu,GGS,J.Vidal ‘04
2. Observables 2. Observables 2.2 Low energies2.2 Low energies
2. Observables 2. Observables 2.2 Low energies2.2 Low energies
2. Observables 2. Observables 2.2 Low energies2.2 Low energies
T , P
CPV
2. Observables 2. Observables 2.2 Low energies2.2 Low energies
2. Observables 2. Observables 2.2 Low energies2.2 Low energies
2. Observables 2. Observables 2.2 Low energies2.2 Low energies
+
2. Observables 2. Observables 2.2 Low energies2.2 Low energies
T
2
w 0
A
dd d
d d
w 2
>>>>
−−−−
−−−−<<<<
−−−−
± ±± ±± ±± ±±±±± + −+ −+ −+ −
± ±± ±± ±± ±
+ −+ −+ −+ −
±±±±
±±±±ττττ±±±±ττττ
±±±±
±±±±ττττ
σ − σσ − σσ − σσ − σ====
σ + σσ + σσ + σσ + σ
σσσσσ = θ φσ = θ φσ = θ φσ = θ φ
θ φθ φθ φθ φ
= θ φ= θ φ= θ φ= θ φ
∫∫∫∫ coscos
sin cos (((( ))))
T 2
CPV
T T
2mA d
2 3 e
1A A A
2
± γ± γ± γ± γττττ± τ± τ± τ± τ
+ −+ −+ −+ −
βγβγβγβγ = − α= − α= − α= − α − β− β− β− β
= += += += +
Im( )
2. Observables 2. Observables 2.2 Low energies2.2 Low energies
Bounds:
For 106/7 ττττ and at low/ΥΥΥΥ energies
upper bound
16 1710
− −< /Re(d ) ecmττττ
γγγγ
3. Conclusions3. Conclusions
���� Polarized beams open the possibility for new
observables
� Improving the number of ττττ–pairs ( ...1011? ) allows to lower the EDM bound by many (...2?) orders of magnitude
���� These new bounds may be important for
beyond the SM ττττ−−−−physics
3. Summary3. Summary
Discussions with J.Bernabeu, J.Vidal and A.Santamaría are gratefully acknowledged
SOME REFERENCES
� J. Bernabeu, G.S., Jordi Vidal
Nuclear Physics B 701 (2004) 87–102
� Daniel Gomez-Dumm, G.S.
Eur. Phys. J. C 11, 293{300 (1999)
� W. Bernreuther, A. Brandenburg, and P. Overmann
Phys. Lett. B 391 (1997) 413; ibid., B 412 (1997) 425.
Recommended