Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
EDM and CPV in the EDM and CPV in the ττττττττ systemsystem
Gabriel González SprinbergInstituto de Física, Facultad de Ciencias
Montevideo Uruguay
DIF06 INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati
OutlineOutline
1. Electric Dipole Moment
1.1 Definition
B = γγγγ, Z, g, …f = e, µµµµ, ττττ, ..., b, t
1.2 Experiments
2. Observables
2.1 High energies2.2 Low energies
3. Conclusions
B
fd
1. EDM 1. EDM 1.1Definition1.1Definition
P and T-odd interaction of a fermionwith gauge fields:Classical electromagnetismOrdinary quantum mechanics
Relativistic quantum mechanics: Dirac equation
Non-relativistic limit:
sdρρ
=d,Edρρ
⋅−=EDMH
( ) 5( )
2
iH i eA m d Fµυ
µυγ σ/= Ψ ∂/ + − Ψ + Ψ Ψ
Edρρ
⋅−=→ EDMHH
EDM LANDAU 1957 T , P odd interactions
In QFT: CPT Invariance
EDMEDM HH −→
SYMMETRIES: Time reversal T, Parity PBesides, chirality flip (some insight into the mass origin)
tt −→ ,EE:ρρ
→ ssρρ
−→
1. EDM 1. EDM 1.1Definition1.1Definition
CP ≈ T
SM : • vertex corrections
• at least 4-loops
Beyond SM: • one loop effect (SUSY,2HDM,...)
• dimension six effective operator
EDM
γγγγ
ττττττττ
1. EDM 1. EDM 1.1Definition1.1Definition
SM :
V V*
E.P.Shabalin ’78
We need 3-loops for a quark-EDM, and 4 loops for a lepton...
J.F.Donoghue ’78I.B.Khriplovich,M.E.Pospelov ‘90A.Czarnecki,B.Krause ‘97
1. EDM 1. EDM 1.1Definition1.1Definition
= 0 !!!
Fermion of mass mf generated by physics atΛΛΛΛ−−−− scale has
EDM mf/ΛΛΛΛ2222
T-odd ττττ−−−−EDM has particular interest anddepends on the underlying physics of CP violation
≈
1. EDM 1. EDM 1.1Definition1.1Definition
Effective Lagrangian:
CPV:
Operators:
Other operators:
1. EDM 1. EDM 1.1Definition1.1Definition
More sensitivity
HIGH ENERGY (Z-peak) LOW ENERGY
ττττ ττττττττ ττττ
WEDM EDM
ΖΖΖΖ γγγγ
1. EDM 1. EDM 1.1Definition1.1Definition
V = γ, Ζγ, Ζγ, Ζγ, Ζ
For q2=0 EDM GAUGE INVARIANT
OBSERVABLE QUANTITIES
q2=MZ2 WEDM
Beyond SM EDM: Loop calculations
5 2 5 2
5( , ) ( ) ( )
V Vp p ie a q q d q
µ µ µννγ γ σ γ− +
Γ = +
1. EDM 1. EDM 1.1Definition1.1Definition
dττττγγγγ
Zd ττττ
PDG ’06 95% CL
EDM BELLE ‘02
WEDM ALEPH 1990-95 LEP runs
1. EDM 1. EDM 1.2 Experiments1.2 Experiments
170 50 10
−≤ ×ZRe(d ) . ecmττττ
171 1 10
−≤ ×ZIm(d ) . ecmττττ
162 2 0 45 10
−− ×Re(d ) : ( . to . ) e cmττττ
γγγγ
160 25 0 008 10
−− ×Im(d ) : ( . to . ) ecmττττ
γγγγ
For other fermions….
1. EDM 1. EDM 1.2 Experiments1.2 Experiments
260 069 0 074 10
−= ± ×ed ( . . ) e cmγγγγ
193 7 3 4 10
−= ± ×d ( . . ) e cmµµµµ
γγγγ
250 63 10 90
−< ×nd . e cm, % CLγγγγ
SM for EDM is well below within present experimental limits:
CKM 3-loopsSM prediction
CKM 4-loops
Hopefullyin the SM
…15 orders of magnitude below experiments...
2. Observables2. Observables
32 3410 10
− −≈ −qd ecmγγγγ
3810
−≈ed ecmγγγγ
33 3410 10
− −≈ ≈ −e
e
md d ecm
mττττ ττττγ γγ γγ γγ γ
Currents limits on electron EDM gives:
However, in many models the EDM do not necessarily scale as the first power of the masses.
Multihiggs models 1-loop contributionsVectorlike leptons
EDM scale as the cube of the mass!
BSM ττττ-EDM can go up to 10-19 e cm
2. Observables2. Observables
242 4 10
−< ×d . ecmττττ
γγγγ
2. Observables2. Observables
2≈
md eττττ ττττ
γγγγΛΛΛΛ
Non-vanishing signal in a ττττ−−−−EDM observable
NEW PHYSICS
One expects: special interest in heavy flavours
ττττ−−−−EDM: In order to be able to measure a genuine non-vanishing signal one has to deal with a -observable CP
2. Observables 2. Observables 2.1 High energies2.1 High energies
Indirect arguments:
any other physics may also contribute…
Look for , linear effects
Genuine CPV observables in ττττ–pair production:
SPIN TERMS and/or SPIN CORRELATIONS
+ − + −
+ −
→
→
(e e )
(Z )
∆σ τ τ∆σ τ τ∆σ τ τ∆σ τ τ
∆Γ τ τ∆Γ τ τ∆Γ τ τ∆Γ τ τ
2
≈ Zdττττ
CPP
2. Observables 2. Observables 2.1 High energies2.1 High energies
Spin terms angular distribution of decay products
• Asymmetries in the decay products• Expectation values of tensor observables
CP :
2. Observables 2. Observables 2.1 High energies2.1 High energies
x: Transverse y: Normal z: Longitudinal
2. Observables 2. Observables 2.1 High energies2.1 High energies
Tensor observables:
Z-peak:
W.Bernreuther,O.Nachtmann ‘89
Normal polarization:
(and needs helicity-flip)
Genuine CPV if
J.Bernabeu,GGS,J.Vidal ‘93
+ − + −= − × + ↔ij i jT (q q ) (q q ) (i j)
±ττττ±
±(q )ππππ
νννν
≈ Zij ij Z
mT c
edsππππππππ
ππππππππ
ττττ
↔ − −NP T odd, P evenττττ
+ −
↔N NP Pτ ττ ττ ττ τ
2. Observables 2. Observables 2.1 High energies2.1 High energies
EDM (and ) is proportional to angular asymmetries,to extract sinθθθθττττ cosθθθθτ τ τ τ sinφφφφh
(more details latter..)
One can measure for and/or
1
2
+ −≡ +CPVA (A A )
NP ττττ
A +ττττ−ττττ
CP :
+ −
+ −
−=
+A
σ σσ σσ σσ σ
σ σσ σσ σσ σ
2 2 22 + + ∝N
ZP sin v (v a ) ma cose
dτττττ τ ττ τ ττ τ ττ τ τ
ττττ
γβ θ β θγβ θ β θγβ θ β θγβ θ β θ
2. Observables 2. Observables 2.2 Low energies2.2 Low energies
Diagrams:
+ − + −+ −→ →e e , (s ) (s )γ ϒ τ τγ ϒ τ τγ ϒ τ τγ ϒ τ τ
d ττττ
γγγγ
d ττττ
γγγγ
2. Observables 2. Observables 2.2 Low energies2.2 Low energies
What about the linear terms?
Interference with the axial part of Z-exchange, suppressed by q2/MZ
2
J.Bernabeu,GGS,J.Vidal ‘04
2. Observables 2. Observables 2.2 Low energies2.2 Low energies
2. Observables 2. Observables 2.2 Low energies2.2 Low energies
2. Observables 2. Observables 2.2 Low energies2.2 Low energies
T , P
CPV
2. Observables 2. Observables 2.2 Low energies2.2 Low energies
2. Observables 2. Observables 2.2 Low energies2.2 Low energies
2. Observables 2. Observables 2.2 Low energies2.2 Low energies
+
2. Observables 2. Observables 2.2 Low energies2.2 Low energies
T
2
w 0
A
dd d
d d
w 2
>>>>
−−−−
−−−−<<<<
−−−−
± ±± ±± ±± ±±±±± + −+ −+ −+ −
± ±± ±± ±± ±
+ −+ −+ −+ −
±±±±
±±±±ττττ±±±±ττττ
±±±±
±±±±ττττ
σ − σσ − σσ − σσ − σ====
σ + σσ + σσ + σσ + σ
σσσσσ = θ φσ = θ φσ = θ φσ = θ φ
θ φθ φθ φθ φ
= θ φ= θ φ= θ φ= θ φ
∫∫∫∫ coscos
sin cos (((( ))))
T 2
CPV
T T
2mA d
2 3 e
1A A A
2
± γ± γ± γ± γττττ± τ± τ± τ± τ
+ −+ −+ −+ −
βγβγβγβγ = − α= − α= − α= − α − β− β− β− β
= += += += +
Im( )
2. Observables 2. Observables 2.2 Low energies2.2 Low energies
Bounds:
For 106/7 ττττ and at low/ΥΥΥΥ energies
upper bound
16 1710
− −< /Re(d ) ecmττττ
γγγγ
3. Conclusions3. Conclusions
���� Polarized beams open the possibility for new
observables
� Improving the number of ττττ–pairs ( ...1011? ) allows to lower the EDM bound by many (...2?) orders of magnitude
���� These new bounds may be important for
beyond the SM ττττ−−−−physics
3. Summary3. Summary
Discussions with J.Bernabeu, J.Vidal and A.Santamaría are gratefully acknowledged
SOME REFERENCES
� J. Bernabeu, G.S., Jordi Vidal
Nuclear Physics B 701 (2004) 87–102
� Daniel Gomez-Dumm, G.S.
Eur. Phys. J. C 11, 293{300 (1999)
� W. Bernreuther, A. Brandenburg, and P. Overmann
Phys. Lett. B 391 (1997) 413; ibid., B 412 (1997) 425.