View
90
Download
13
Category
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
Convertible bond pricing model. 資管所 蘇柏屹 指導老師 戴天時. Agenda. Introduction Credit risk model Convertible bond pricing model Our convertible bond pricing model. Introduction. C onvertible bond is a hybrid attributes of both fi xed-income securities and equity - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Convertible bond pricing model
資管所 蘇柏屹指導老師 戴天時
Agenda
• Introduction
• Credit risk model
• Convertible bond pricing model
• Our convertible bond pricing model
Introduction
• Convertible bond is a hybrid attributes of both fixed-income securities and equity
• In specific period, convertible bond can be converted into equity with predetermined convert ratio
• Convertible bonds have call features, which provide the issuer a way to force conversion or redemption of the bonds
Credit risk model
• Firm value model (Merton,1974)– Credit risk is considered equity as call option on firm's
assets
• First passage time model (Black & Cox ,1976)– Solve the problem of premature bankruptcy
• Intensity Model (Jarrow & Turnbull ,1995)– Use an arbitrage-free bankruptcy process that
triggers default
Firm value model (Structure model)
• Assume– Firm has only one class of bond that has no
coupon payment and the risk-free interest rate is constant
– Bankruptcy is triggered at the maturity and the cost for bankruptcy is zero
)max( DVE
EDV
TT
TT
Firm value model (Structure model)
)2()(
:'
&requirewe,&calcuteTo
)(isyprobabilitdefaulty,probabilitneutralriskUnder
,)2/(ln
where
)1()()(
calculateformulaB/S
0100000
021
2
12
20
1
2100
0
VdNEorVV
EE
lemmasItoFrom
Vdd
dN
TddT
TrDVd
dNDedNVE
E
VV
V
V
V
V
rT
First passage time model
))(
))(2
()ln(
(1
)ln()2
(2exp
))(
))(2
()ln(
()(
: to timefromy probabilitdefault infer thecan weprinciple, reflection Using
inf
boundaryreachtotimefirstis
andyet eredbeen triggnot hasdefault and 0 at time are weIf
constant exogenousan as and with ,
boundary specied a crosses valuesfirm' theif occurs bankruptcy Assume
2
)(
2
2
2
)(
)(
tT
tTeV
B
NV
Br
tT
tTeV
B
NtTP
Tt
BVts
B V t
KKeB
V
VtT
t
Vt
V
V
VtT
t
s
t
tT
Intensity Model
abilitiespseudoprobthese
ofuniquenesstoequivalentissscompleteneMarket
smartingaleare)(/),(),(/),(
thatsuch,abilitypseudoprobexistarbitrage,noAssume
timeatdollar1paying
bondcouponzerodefaultofvaluedollarTime:),(
0timeatdollar1with
dinitializeaccountmarketmoneyofvaluedollarTime:)(
timeatdollar1paying
bondcouponzerofreedefaultofvaluedollarTime:),(
tBTtvtBTtp
tT
tTtv
ttB
tT
tTtp
t
Intensity Model
000
00)0(
)]1()[1,0(
)]1([)1,0(
default in rate payoffbond free-DefaultbondDefault
findp
ev r
Intensity Model
1
1100
110)1(
110)1(
0)1(
0)1()0(
)]}1()[1(){2,0(
)]}1()[1)(1(
)]1()[1()1({)2,0(
default in rate payoffbond free-DefaultbondDefault
find
p
e
eeeevd
udu
r
rrrr
Paper survey
• Structure model: Assume stochastic processes for S&r, and use Ito’s lemma to derive PDE, then exploit boundary condition to solve PDE– Brenen & Schwartz(1977)– Brenen & Schwartz(1980)
• Reduce model: Use tree model to simulate S&r, and calculate each node price then rollback – Hung & Wang(2002)– Chambers & Lu(2007)
Brenen & Schwartz(1980)
conversion before priceStock :
bond eConvertibl :
bondstraight of ueMarket val :
:securities three theof sum is Assume
right puttable no have investers
andCB,ofmaturityatonlyoccurwilldefaultAssume
BC
BCOCB
S
C
B
SNCNBNV
V
Brenen & Schwartz(1980)
)(
:conversionafter CBeach ofholder by owned shares totalofFraction
1000)(
:$1000 is par value CB Assume
place takehas conversionafter priceStock :
conversion ofresult a as issued share ofNumber :
)(
is valuefirm theCB,convert After
ΔNNq/Z
qNN
n price/Conversio RatioConversionq
S
N
SNNBNV
O
C
AC
ACOB
Call & conversion strategy
convert)call),ld,max(min(ho
when
CB of value theMinimize
Strategy Call
][
][) valueconversion(when
valueconversion its below falls valueCB ifconvert toOptimal
Strategy Conversion
Call priceC
Call priceC
BV-NZC
BV-NZqSC
B
BAC
Random process
rstockholde toDividend :),(
bondholder econvertibl Coupon to :
bondholdersenior Coupon to :
),(),(
holderssecurity payment tocash Total :),(
)],([
)(
:processes random follow& Assume
return future of gdiscountinby valueCB affects
valueconversion andy probabilitdefault through valueCB affects
tVD
I
I
tVDIItVQ
tVQ
dZVσdttVQVμdV
dZrσdtrμαdr
rV
r
V
CB
B
CBB
VVV
rrr
CB’s PDE
rV
tVrrr
rrrrVVrVVV
dZdZ
c
F
CcFrCTVQrVCrrC
rCVrCVC
and between n correlatio ousInstantane :
rateCoupon :
par value CB :
risk rateinterest of priceMarket :
0)],([])([2
1
2
1
:PDE thesatisfies CB of valuelemma, sIto'By
2222
Boundary condition
0
00
0
0
0)(1)(1
)(1)),,((
)),,(()),,((
)(
ConditionMaturity The
)(
Condition Bankruptcy The
)(
Condition Call The
))(()(
Condition Conversion The
BNVif
BNVNFifBNVN
BNVNFTrVBNVZifF
FTrVBNVZifTrVBNVZ
V,r,tC
FkNBNVifkFV,r,TC
CPV,r,tC
V,r,tBV-NZV,r,tC
B
BCBC
BCB
BB
CO
B
B
Reduce model (simple)
yield dividend :
rate free-risk :
where
1,,,
intensitydefault neutral-risk is
raterecovery has bond and 0 tofalls coccurs,default When
timeperiodshort each in y probabilitdefault
th motion wiBrownian geometric follows Assume
)(
)( 2
q
r
ea
udeu
du
auePd
du
deaPu
λ
δS
tλΔt
S
Δtr-q
ttt
Reduce model (simple)
48080516708681015191
250405130
501132100750 Assume 0
., Pd., Pu., d.u
.%, Δ,%, δ, r% per yearm, λ,% per annuσ
,, S, CP, CR year, F.T
s
Reduce model
S Cox-Ross-Rubinstein (CRR model)
r Ho-Lee lognormal model
λ Jarrow & Turnbull Intensity Model
S & r without correction Hung & Wang two factor model
S & r with correction Das & Sundaram two factor model
Ho-Lee(1986) lognormal model
Δtσd
Δtσu
r
r
eRR
eRR
0
0
CRR model
du
dep
ud
eu
SeSd
SeSu
Δtr
Δtσ
Δtσ
Δtσ
f
s
s
s
1
Two factor tree with correction
R,S
Ru,Su
Rd,Su
Ru,Sd
Rd,Sd
p1
p2
p3
p4
Jarrow & Turnbull Intensity Model
100
0
0
11
find , observe , Assume
rateinterest free-riskyear -One :
rateinterest risky year -One :
])1[(1 00
λRRδ
R
R
eδλλe
*
*
RR *
Adjust CRR probability
nodeparent for the rateinterest is ,)1/(~
treerateinterest free-risk with treeCRR adjusted Combine
])1()1(
[
)]1()1/(
)1()1/(
[
)]1)(~1()1(~0[
)1/(~
yprobabilit CRR eadjust th tonecessary isit
tree,arbitrage-non neutralrisk a develop order toIn
Rdu
dλep
Sdu
deS
du
ueSe
du
u-eSd
du
deSue
pSdλpSuλe
du
dλep
itR
ΔtrΔtrΔt-r
ΔtrΔtrΔt-r
Δt-r
Δtr
ff
f
ff
f
f
f
Reduce model (Chamber & Lu)
R,S
Ru,Su
Rd,Su
Ru,Sd
Rd,Sd
p1(1-λ i)
p2(1-λi)
p3 (1-λi)p
4 (1-λi)
δ
λi
Our pricing model
• Improve default probability which is unrelated to stock price
• Improve default only occur in maturity date
• Structure model + down & out barrier option + FPM + KMV
Structure model + down & out barrier option
)(22
222
)(
,)2(
)ln(,
)ln(
&Fit
)(
)()()()(
)()(
)( 0
)())(()(
optionbarrier out &down Use
imply vol form estimatecan ,
tTtVV
V
V
t
t
V
V
t
t
Vt
tVtE
Vt
trT
t
tqTt
VrTqT
tt
tTr
Etst
keBqr
TT
VB
yTT
BV
x
V
VxNEσ
TyNVBDeyNV
BeV
TxNDeexNVE
B t if V
Bt if V-DetVtE
σSNE
tt
t
t
t
t
t
tt
t
t
t
First Passage Model+KMV
VuV
Vd
Default boundary=Ke-γ(T-t)
λS(t)
S
Su
Sd
Default boundary=Ke-γ(T-t)
K1/2 long debt+ short debt (KMV), γ r
Default probability
V(t)
Assume V ~Lognormal distribution
σv
Default boundary=Ke-γ(T-t)
Default probability
The log-normal distribution has PDF
Further work
• The default boundary is given exogenously
• Use market CB to look for imply boundary
Recommended