coin.fao.org · Web viewPROJECT TITLE: PROJECT SYMBOL: Recipient Country/ies: Resource Partner: FAO...

PROJECT TITLE: PROJECT SYMBOL: Recipient Country/ies:

Resource Partner:

FAO project ID: GEF/LDCF/SCCF Project ID:

Executing Partner(s):

Expected EOD (starting date):

Expected NTE (End date):

Contribution to FAO’s Strategic Framework1

a. Strategic objective/Organizational Result:b. Regional Result/Priority Area:c. Country Programming Framework Outcome:

GEF Focal Area/LDCF/SCCF:

GEF/LDCF/SCCF Strategic Objectives:

Environmental Impact Assessment Category (insert √): A B C

Financing Plan: GEF/LDCF/SCCF allocation:Co-financing:

Subtotal Co-financing:

Total Budget:

USD USDUSDUSDUSD

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

FAO/GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITYPROJECT DOCUMENT

1 For projects operated by country offices, it is necessary to link projects in FPMIS at OR level. For all other projects, linkage at product/service level is necessary

TABLE OF CONTENTS

GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS...........................................................4

SECTION 1 – RELEVANCE (STRATEGIC FIT AND RESULTS ORIENTATION)...51.1 GENERAL CONTEXT.........................................................5

1.1.1 Rationale..............................................................51.1.2 FAO’s comparative advantages..............................51.1.3 Participants and other stakeholders.......................51.1.4 Lessons learned from past and related work, including evaluations.....................................................51.1.5 Links to national development goals, strategies, plans, policy and legislation, GEF/LDCF/SCCF and FAO’s Strategic Objectives.......................................................5

SECTION 2 – PROJECT FRAMEWORK AND EXPECTED RESULTS................62.1 PROJECT STRATEGY........................................................62.2 PROJECT OBJECTIVES......................................................62.3 EXPECTED PROJECT OUTCOMES.......................................62.4 PROJECT COMPONENTS AND OUTPUTS.............................62.5 GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS/ADAPTATION BENEFITS.............................................................................62.6 COST EFFECTIVENESS (alternative strategies and methodologies considered)...................................................62.7 INNOVATIVENESS...........................................................6

SECTION 3 – FEASIBILITY (FUNDAMENTAL DIMENSIONS FOR HIGH QUALITY DELIVERY)......................................................................7

3.1 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT...........................73.2 RISK MANAGEMENT........................................................7

3.2.1 Risks and mitigation measures...............................73.2.2 Fiduciary risk analysis and mitigation measures (only for NEX projects)...................................................7

SECTION 4 – IMPLEMENTATION AND MANAGEMENT ARRANGEMENTS.....84.1 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.....................................84.2 IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS.................................8

4.3 FINANCIAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT..................84.3.1 Financial plan (by component, outputs and co-financier).......................................................................84.3.2 GEF/LDCF/SCCF inputs...........................................94.3.3 Government inputs................................................94.3.4 FAO inputs............................................................94.3.5 Other co-financiers inputs......................................94.3.6 Financial management of and reporting on GEF/LDCF/SCCF resources...............................................9

4.4 PROCUREMENT...............................................................94.5 MONITORING AND REPORTING.........................................9

4.5.1 Oversight and monitoring responsibilities..............94.5.2 Indicators and information sources........................94.5.3 Reporting schedule................................................94.5.4 Monitoring and evaluation plan summary...............9

4.6 PROVISION FOR EVALUATIONS........................................94.7 COMMUNICATION AND VISIBILITY....................................9

SECTION 5 – SUSTAINABILITY OF RESULTS.......................................105.1 SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY................................................105.2 ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY.................................105.3 FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC SUSTAINABILITY..................105.4 SUSTAINABILITY OF CAPACITIES DEVELOPED.................105.5 APPROPRIATENESS OF TECHNOLOGY INTRODUCED.........105.6 REPLICABILITY AND SCALING UP....................................10

APPENDICES...............................................................................11

APPENDIX 1: RESULTS MATRIX.......................................................12

APPENDIX 2: WORK PLAN (RESULTS BASED)......................................17

APPENDIX 3: RESULTS BUDGET.......................................................20

APPENDIX 4: RISK MATRIX............................................................25

APPENDIX 5: PROCUREMENT PLAN..................................................26

APPENDIX 6: TERMS OF REFERENCE (TORS)......................................27

OTHER APPENDICES AS REQUIRED BY THE PROJECT..........................28

GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS

AWP/B Annual Work Plan and Budget

BH Budget Holder

CEO Chief Executing Officer (GEF)

EP Executing Partner

FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

FPMIS Field Project Management Information System

GEBs Global Environmental BenefitsGEF Global Environment FacilityGEFSEC GEF Secretariat

LTO Lead Technical OfficerLTU Lead Technical Unit

M&E Monitoring and Evaluation

PIF Project Identification Form (GEF)

PIR Project Implementation Review

PPG Project Preparation Grant (GEF)PPR Project Progress Report

PRODOC Project DocumentPSC Project Steering Committee

PY Project Year

STAP Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel

TCI Investment Centre Division (FAO)

TOR Terms of Reference

USD United States Dollar

SECTION 1 – RELEVANCE (strategic fit and results orientation)

1.1 GENERAL CONTEXTa) General development context related to the projectb) Global Environmental Benefits (GEB) status, threats and causes (for GEF

Projects)/Climate Change (CC) vulnerability (for LDCF/SCCF projects)c) Institutional and policy frameworkd) Problems the project will address

1.1.1 Rationalea) Baseline projects and investments for the next 3-5 years addressing the

identified GEB threats and causes and development of the CC vulnerable sector (main co-financing sources of the project)

b) Remaining barriers to address threats on GEB/CC vulnerabilitiesc) Incremental/additional reasoning (added value of the GEF/LDCF/SCCF

financing)

1.1.2 FAO’s comparative advantages

1.1.3 Participants and other stakeholders

1.1.4 Lessons learned from past and related work, including evaluations

1.1.5 Links to national development goals, strategies, plans, policy and legislation, GEF/LDCF/SCCF and FAO’s Strategic Objectives

a) Alignment national development goals and policiesb) Alignment with NAPA, NAPs, NBSAP, NIPs, NAMAc) Alignment with GEF focal area and/or LDCF/SCCF strategiesd) Alignment with FAO Strategic Framework and Objectives

SECTION 2 – PROJECT FRAMEWORK AND EXPECTED RESULTS

2.1 PROJECT STRATEGY

2.2 PROJECT OBJECTIVES

2.3 EXPECTED PROJECT OUTCOMES

2.4 PROJECT COMPONENTS AND OUTPUTS

2.5 GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS/ADAPTATION BENEFITS 2.6 COST EFFECTIVENESS (alternative strategies and methodologies considered)

2.7 INNOVATIVENESS

SECTION 3 – FEASIBILITY (FUNDAMENTAL DIMENSIONS FOR HIGH QUALITY DELIVERY)

3.1 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT

3.2 RISK MANAGEMENT

3.2.1 Risks and mitigation measures

3.2.2 Fiduciary risk analysis and mitigation measures (only for NEX projects)a) Macro analysisb) Micro analysisc) Action plan for capacity strengthening of Executing Partner if needed

SECTION 4 – IMPLEMENTATION AND MANAGEMENT ARRANGEMENTS

4.1 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS a) General institutional context and responsibilitiesb) Coordination with other ongoing and planned related initiatives

4.2 IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS1-2 introductory paragraphs about the project management structure (very brief description of project set-up, including role of FAO, lead executing partner, etc., followed by a longer Project Steering Committee, Project Management/Coordination Unit, Project Task Force, Technical Advisory Group, where relevant, etc.)a) Roles and responsibilities of the executing partnersb) FAO’s role and responsibilities, as the GEF Agency (and as an executing

agency, when applicable), including delineation of responsibilities internally within FAO

c) Project technical, coordination and steering committeesd) Organizational chart

4.3 FINANCIAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT

4.3.1 Financial plan (by component, outputs and co-financier)

This table should be copied in from the Excel budget deleting the tables below only inserted for demonstration.

Component/output

[Insert name of

co-financier]

[Insert name of

co-financier]

[Insert name of

co-financier]

Total Co-

finan-cing

GEF % GEF Total

Component. 1: [Insert component title] O 1.1.1: [Insert output, eventually abbreviated]

O 1.1.2: …

… Component 2: [Insert component title] O 2.1.1: [Insert output, eventually abbreviated]

O 2.1.2:…

… Component 3: [Insert component title] O 3.1.1: [Insert output, eventually abbreviated]

O 3.1.2:…

Component 4: [Insert component title] O 4.1.1: [Insert output, eventually abbreviated]

O 4.1.2: …

… Component 5: [Insert component title] …

…Project ManagementTotal Project

4.3.2 GEF/LDCF/SCCF inputs

4.3.3 Government inputs

4.3.4 FAO inputs

4.3.5 Other co-financiers inputs

4.3.6 Financial management of and reporting on GEF/LDCF/SCCF resources

4.4 PROCUREMENT

4.5 MONITORING AND REPORTING

4.5.1 Oversight and monitoring responsibilities

4.5.2 Indicators and information sources

4.5.3 Reporting schedule

4.5.4 Monitoring and evaluation plan summary

4.6 PROVISION FOR EVALUATIONS

4.7 COMMUNICATION AND VISIBILITY

SECTION 5 – SUSTAINABILITY OF RESULTS

5.1 SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY Local socioeconomic benefits link to GEB including food security, gender equality and mainstreaming, and indigenous people

5.2 ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY

5.3 FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC SUSTAINABILITY

5.4 SUSTAINABILITY OF CAPACITIES DEVELOPED

5.5 APPROPRIATENESS OF TECHNOLOGY INTRODUCED

5.6 REPLICABILITY AND SCALING UP

APPENDICES

APPENDIX 1: RESULTS MATRIX

Project outcomes and impacts: 1

Objective/Impact Baseline Outcome indicators AssumptionsGlobal Environmental Objective:

Project Development Objective: 2

Component 1: Component 1: Component 1:

1 Please insert/delete rows for components as needed2 In line with FAO SOs

Project outputs and outcomes:1

Indicators Baseline2 Target

Milestones towards achieving output and outcome targets Data Collection and Reporting

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Means of verification

Responsible for Data

CollectionComponent 1: [Component title]Outcome 1.1....Output 1.1.1...Output 1.1.2...Output 1.1.3...Outcome 1.2...Output 1.2.1...Output 1.2.2...Output 1.2.3...

1 Please insert/delete columns for project years and rows for outputs and outcomes as needed. 2 Value in the case of quantitative indicators and description of situation in the case of qualitative indicators. Please insert the year of the baseline

Indicators Baseline Target

Responsible for Data Collection

Component 3: [Component title]Outcome 3.1....Output 3.1.1...Output 3.1.2...Output 3.1.3...Outcome 3.2

Responsible for Data Collection

...Output 3.2.1...Output 3.2.2...Output 3.2.3...

CollectionComponent 5 [Component title]Outcome 5.1....Output 5.1.1...Output 5.1.2...Output 5.1.3...Outcome 5.2...Output 5.2.1...Output 5.2.2...Output 5.2.3...

APPENDIX 2: WORK PLAN (RESULTS BASED)

Insert rows, components and outputs as needed

Output Activities

Responsible institution/

entity

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

Component 1: [Insert title]Output 1.1.1 Activity

Activity

Output 1.1.2 Activity

Activity

Output ... Activity

Activity

Output ... Activity

Activity

Output ... Activity

Activity

Output ... Activity

Activity

Component 2: [Insert title]

Output Activities

entity

Output 2.2.1. Activity

Activity

Output ... Activity

Activity

Output ... Activity

Activity

Output ... Activity

Activity

Output ... Activity

Activity

Component 3: [Insert title]Output 3.1.1 Activity

Activity

Output ... Activity

Activity

Output ... Activity

Output Activities

entity

Activity

ActivityOutput ... Activity

Activity

Project Management Activity

ActivityActivity

Activity

APPENDIX 3: RESULTS BUDGET

These tables should be copied in from the Excel budget deleting the two tables below only inserted for demonstration. Component. 1: [Insert component title]

Component 2: [Insert component title]

O 1.1.1: [Insert output, eventually abbreviated]

O 5.1.1 : [Insert output, eventually abbreviated]

BUDGET IN USD Total Expenditures by year

Oracle code and description Unit

No. of units

Unit cost

Component 1: Component 2: Component 3: Component 4: Component 5: PM GEF Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year4 Year 5

1.1.1 1.1.2 1.2.1 1.2.2 Total 2.1.1 2.1.2 2.1.3 2.2.1 2.2.2 Total 3.1.1 3.1.2 3.2.1 Total 4.1.1 4.1.2 4.2.1 Total 5.1.1 5.1.2 Total 5300 Salaries professionals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5300 Sub-total salaries professionals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05570 International Consultants 0 0 0 0 0 Sub-total international Consultants 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0National consultants 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub-total national Consultants 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05570 Sub-total consultants 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05650 Contracts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5650 Sub-total Contracts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05900 Travel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5900 Sub-total travel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05023 Training and workshops 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5023 Sub-total training 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06000 Expendable procurement 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6000 Sub-total expendable procurement 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06100 Non-expendable procurement 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6100 Sub-total non-expendable procurement 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06300 GOE budget 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6300 Sub-total GOE budget 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SUBTOTAL Comp 1 0 #DIV/0!SUBTOTAL Comp 2 0 #DIV/0!SUBTOTAL Comp 3 0 #DIV/0!SUBTOTAL Comp 4 0 #DIV/0!SUBTOTAL Comp 5 0 #DIV/0!SUBTOTAL Project Management 0 #DIV/0!TOTAL GEF 0 #DIV/0!

APPENDIX 4: RISK MATRIX

Please use format from the “FAO Guide to the Project Cycle”

APPENDIX 5: PROCUREMENT PLAN

Please use format from the “FAO Guide to the Project Cycle”

APPENDIX 6: TERMS OF REFERENCE (TORS)

OTHER APPENDICES AS REQUIRED BY THE PROJECT

coin.fao.org · Web viewPROJECT TITLE: PROJECT SYMBOL: Recipient Country/ies: Resource Partner: FAO...

Documents

SDHplus project Project partner - Solar District Heating

Update on the ldcf leg regional workshop malawi

FINAL PROJECT PARTNER REPORT - WordPress.com & MEASURABLE PARTNER REPORT: MORAY HSCP 0 FINAL PROJECT PARTNER REPORT MORAY HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE PARTNERSHIP February 2015MEANINGFUL

FINAL PROJECT PARTNER REPORT PROJECT PARTNER REPORT VOICE OF CARERS ACROSS LOTHIAN (VOCAL) February 2013 MEANINGFUL & MEASURABLE PARTNER REPORT: VOCAL 0 MEANINGFUL & MEASURABLE PARTNER

Assignment 3 genre partner project

FINAL PROJECT PARTNER REPORT - WordPress.com PROJECT PARTNER REPORT ANGUS COUNCIL February 2015 MEANINGFUL & MEASURABLE PROJECT PARTNER REPORT: ANGUS COUNCIL 1 Angus Council Bridgend

STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT OF THE LDCF PIPELINE › sites › default › files › council... · GEF/LDCF.SCCF.23/Inf.04 November 22, 2017 23rd LDCF/SCCF Council Meeting November 30, 2017

Project Solution Partner

Financing Adaptation through GEF Adaptation Funds: LDCF ...€¦ · GEF, through LDCF, SCCF and SPA: • The most comprehensive and the most advanced global portfolio of adaptation

LDCF/SCCF Climate Change Adaptation Strategy

PROTECTING CLIMATE FINANCE · AN OVERVIEW 18 THE ACCOUNTABILITY MAPPING 19 Overview of LDCF and SCCF Project Cycle, Actors and Accountability 19 GEF Assembly 25 GEF and LDCF/SCCF

LDCF/SCCF SPECIAL STUDY OF COMPLETED PROJECTS · GEF/LDCF.SCCF.26/ME/Inf.01/Rev.01 June 10, 2019 26th LDCF/SCCF Council Meeting . June 13, 2019 . Washington, D.C. LDCF/SCCF SPECIAL

Project Document - Deliverable Description€¦ · Web view2020. 7. 6. · Project Document template for nationally implemented projects. financed by the GEF/LDCF/SCCF Trust Funds

A Multi-Partner Research Project

Follow up to the LDCF Evaluation (Prepared by DANIDA)

GEF Least Development Countries Fund (LDCF) Fact Sheets 2009

M ain project partner

Genre Partner Project Carolle Version

68 - thegef.org€¦ · 10516 Project Type FSP Type of Trust Fund LDCF CBIT/NGI CBIT NGI Project Title Improving the climate resilience of agro-sylvo-pastoral production systems in

LDCF Program Evaluation 2016 w Annexes