Clock Simulation Jenn Transue, Tim Murphy, and Jacob Medinilla 1

Preview:

Citation preview

Clock Simulation

Jenn Transue, Tim Murphy, and Jacob Medinilla

1

2

Overview

Project Overview Introduction

Background

Design Specifications

Preliminary Design

Simulation

Conclusion

Project Overview

Tim Murphy

3

4

Introduction

Clock simulation

Closed-loop position

Tracking a stepped input

5

Background

12° every 2 seconds

1 complete revolution every minute

Plant transfer function:

6

Design Specifications

Time domain specifications: Settling time: < 0.5 seconds

Percent overshoot: < 10%

Zero steady-state error

Variation of a PID controller

7

Preliminary Design

Jenn Transue

8

Preliminary Design

Response to a step input Uncompensated System

Proportional (P) Controller

Proportional Derivative (PD) Controller

9

Preliminary Design – Uncompensated

Uncompensated closed-loop system: 54.6% overshoot

1.01 second settling time

Zero steady-state error

10

Preliminary Design – P Controller

Root Locus Analysis: 10% Overshoot

KP = 0.102

11

Preliminary Design – P Controller

Compensated closed-loop system: Kp = 0.102

9.97% overshoot

0.94 second settling time

Zero steady-state error

Cannot meet settling time specification

12

Preliminary Design – PD Controller

From Specifications and Plant: Resulted in:

13.3% Overshoot

0.386 Second Settling Time

Need to adjust to achieve desired overshoot

13

Preliminary Design – PD Controller

Adjusted overshoot specification in calculations

Compensated closed-loop system: Kp = 0.3895

Kd = 0.0219

10% overshoot

0.427 second settling time

Zero steady-state error

Do not need an integral component

Simulation

Jacob Medinilla

14

15

Simulation – Pole-Zero Plot

Compensated closed-loop system

Stable

Relatively fast system

16

Simulation – Model

Compensated System Response to Stepped Input

17

Simulation – Results

Compensated System Response to Stepped Input

18

Conclusion – Expected Challenges

Design not validated Potential for unexpected behavior

Sensitivity to controller tuning

Possibility erroneous values from previous labs

19

Conclusion – Schematic

20

Summary

Uncompensated System cannot meet specifications

Proportional Controller cannot meet specifications

PD Controller required Kp = 0.3895

Kd = 0.0219

Will need to adjust gains to achieve specifications in lab

21

Questions?

Recommended