View
214
Download
0
Category
Tags:
Preview:
Citation preview
ANNETTE ENEMARKDirector of Tetraplan (DK)
You are……familiar with the S.U.M.P planning process
Stand up
…an experienced S.U.M.P’er
Keep standing Otherwise: Sit right back
Special European Barometer: Attitudes of European towards Urban Mobility, 2013
Will mobility conditions change? 24% belive it will improve
37% belive it will be worse
35% belive it will be the same
One-third of the memberstates feel their access in cities are beeing limited
In more than half the memberstates congestion is an important urban problem
38% of citizens encounter problems when traveling within cities
Special European Barometer: Attitudes of European towards Urban Mobility, 2013
Who should fix the problems..
56% City authorities
52% Citizens themselves
28% Regional authorities
27% National Government
3% Private companies
The story of S.U.M.P.
Action Plan on Urban Mobility (2009)
White Paper (2011)
Urban Mobility Package (2013)
Funding optionsHorizon 2020
INTEREG
Civitas Activity Fund ...
SUMP vs. traditional planning
The Transport planner
The SUMP Way The Urban planner
Approach Access to roads, busses, bike lanes…
The need of the traveller
All things at the right place
Aim Optimize capacity Optimize mobility Optimize land use
Focus Reduction of risks, as accidents, noise, pollution
Accessibility Reduction of negative impacts from other functions
Solution Hardware solutions Software and hardware solution
Strict land use laws
Understanding of mobility
Movement from A to B in time and space
More than from A to B
A side-effect to be managed
Adapted with pride from: Mobility researchers from Aalborg University, The SUMP manual , Can Less sometimes be more? Integrating land use and transport, 2013,
Sce
nari
o
Base
d o
n t
he U
rban P
lanner
Model, V
EM
A.
Form
elm
.dk
-80%
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Changes in modal split if...
Scenario of 100 families Changes in modal split if...
Mult
i fam
ily
All bik
e
All Public
tra
nspor
t
½ p
arki
ng
Full
Mon
ty
-80%
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Car
Bike /walk
Public Transport
Modalsplit 100 singleFamily Houses
The many devils …
The siloes
The outreach to internal and external partners
The active engagement with the public
Setting targets and evaluating effects
Finding the funding
Securing political backing
Time consuming
Interactions in the mobility management sector: new coopera-tions, techniques, solutions, ECOMM 1999.Regional aspects of MM, ECOMM 2000.Responsible mobility - active partnerships,
ECOMM 2002.Managing transport demand to attain sustainable development and economic effectiveness, ECOMM 2003.Transition
toward a sustainable urban mobility: demonstrate to convince, ECOMM 2004. Delivering attractive options for sustainable travel in different
stages of life – current demands shaping the future of travel, ECOMM
2005.Accessibility and attractiveness of cities, ECOMM
2006.The future and MM, ECOMM 2007.TDM - Tackling Climate Change, ECOMM 2008. Cost/benefit and evaluation of
MM, ECOMM 2009. Moving people - bridging spaces, ECOMM
2010. Economic Recession: A new dawn for MM, ECOMM 2011. MM -
Key Factor for European development, ECOMM 2012. Smart choices require easy access – the challenge of making MM a part of
every day life, ECOMM 2013. Creating the bridge to a green,
fair and prosperous mobility future, ECOMM 2014.
GOODPRACTICES.U.M.P.
Cop
en
hag
en
– v
isio
n a
nd
goal sett
ing
Borrowed - with thanks - from Dr. Susanne Böhler-Baedeker, Rupprecht Consult
West o
f En
gla
nd
partn
ersh
ip
– institu
tion
al c
oop
era
tion
Birm
ing
ham
– in
teg
ratin
g e
nerg
y a
nd
m
ob
ility p
lan
nin
g
Gent – consequent sustainable urban mobility planning
Vie
nn
a
– q
uality
-con
trolled
u
rban
mob
ilit
y s
trate
gy
Dresden– stakeholder and citizen involvement
Is S.U.M.P.the new black?
Recommended