Why Automation?

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

Automation of Marine Container Terminals is needed now to increase capacity, improve efficiency and lower environmental impacts while avoiding the construction of additional berths.

Citation preview

Container TerminalsFor the 21st Century

Daniel Reiss, President + CEOAutomated Terminal Systems, Inc.

1025 Connecticut Avenue NWWashington DC 20036

atsysusa@atsysusa.comwww.atsysusa.com

Telephone: +1.703.723.0861Facsimile: +1.703.723.0862

1

The Issues:

2

Capacity

Congestion

Rising Costs

Diminishing Efficiency

Environmental Constraints

Diminishing Returns on

Increasing $s Spent

0

250

500

750

1,000

1965 1975 1985 1995 2005 2015

$s Spent % Improvement

3

What is Wrong with Current Systems + Methods?

Too Fragile

Too Complex

Too Expensive

Rely on Expert Systems

New Facility Designs Repeat the Errors of the Past

4

Why?Terminal Operations were Sub-Optimal in the First Instance

Accretion of Methods and Subsystems

Lack of Integration

Piecemeal Solutions

Keeping those Practices in Place only Embeds them Even Further

5

How to Go Forward

Look Outside the Industry

Stop Trying to Get a Different Result by Continuing to Do the Same Thing

Example - What was the Response to Larger Ships?

Add Ship-to-Shore Cranes

6

Large Robust RMGs

CMAA Class F - AISE Sever Duty

Replace Multiple Units

Lower Operational Cost per Unit

Higher Reliability > 99.99999

Higher Availability > 99.99999

7

Lessons Learned in Heavy Industry

Piecemeal Solutions Do Not Work

Integrated End-to-End Systems are Required

Automation is Not Justified Through Reductions in Head Count

Appropriate Automation Solutions Contribute to the Bottom Line While Maintaining Stable Labor Environment

8

IACT is the FutureIntegrated End-to-End System

2Xs the Capacity

2.5Xs the Throughput

CI Real-time Process Control + Management

Environmentally Friendly

Low Cost

9

Volumetric Efficiency

AssumptionsHypothetical Area

305 x 305m (1,000' x 1,000')6 High Stack

Maximum Numberof TEU Footprints = 6,250

Maximum Numberof Container Locations = 37,500

10

0

22.5

45.0

67.5

90.0

% Volume

Wheeled Strads RTGs IACT

Low CostConventional IACT

0

37.5

75.0

112.5

150.0

1 Berth 2 Berths 3 Berths 4 Berths

$s M

Acquisition

0

0.9

1.8

2.7

3.6

4.5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Hours per Year (000s)

Operation

$s M

11

Environmentally FriendlyReduced Footprint

Faster Ship + Truck Turn Times

All Electric System

No Particulate Emissions

No Hydrocarbons

Low Noise

Low Light

Kyoto Compliant℠12

Easy to Implement

Overlays Existing RTG + Strad Configurations

Minimal Disruption

Gate and Business Systems Remain in Place

13

Ease Road + Rail Congestion

Automated All-Electric Shuttle Car System

Light WeightHigh SpeedLow Cost

Remote Gates Eventually

14

Light Weight + Low CostNot a Rail Car

Not MagLev

Facilitates Low Cost Construction of Elevated Rights-of-Way

Individually Dispatched + Driven

15

Automation

Not a Labor Show-Stopper

Contributes to the Bottom Line Without a Reduction in Head Count

Safer Cleaner Working Environment

Increased Terminal Efficiency

Contributes to the Amelioration of the Other Problems

16

Next StepsVisit Our Website:

http://www.atsysusa.com

Contact Dan Reiss

President + CEO

email: dan.reiss@atsysusa.com

Telephone: +1.703.723.0861

Facsimile: +1.703.723.0862

17