Upload
millennium-aviation-inc
View
162
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Airlines need to optimize the entire passenger experience path. But it needs to be related to each individual's purpose of the trip, not the travel itself. If this can be achieved, then airlines would be in a better position to excel in the arena of ancillary revenue generation.
Citation preview
4 concrete steps for ancillary revenue generation
Interview of airline industry expert, Dr. Ricardo Pilon
by
Ritesh Gupta, Airline Information Correspondent
4 concrete steps that can pave way for ancillary revenue generation
Airlines need to optimise the passenger experience path. If this can be achieved, then
airlines would be in a better position to excel in the arena of ancillary revenue
generation.
By Ritesh Gupta,
Airline Information Correspondent
There are times when as a passenger I am willing to pay for certain amenities or
services provided it can be offered when and where it is relevant, not when the airline
thinks it is relevant.
So, for instance, an airline is offering a deal featuring an enhanced meal on a
transatlantic flight, and this can be availed only when a flight is being booked on the
brand website. But what if as a traveller I am open to paying for the same deal before
boarding the flight? I can’t imagine this happening that easily today.
Ricardo V. Pilon, CEO, Millennium Aviation, agrees and says the answer to such
conundrum lies in the sophistication, attention to detail, and efficiency of relevant
services that are bundled around specific trip purposes.
“We have to shift the focal point of commercial aviation from transportation to the
individual’s purpose of the trip,” said Pilon.
Here some critical aspects that airlines need to focus on to combat structural profit
leakage problem:
- Knowing customers better: If airlines find ways to know their customers better, then this will improve the customer experience path as well as revenue
generation. “We need to get the customers’ permission to build multiple profiles
about themselves depending on how they decide to travel and what it is that they
would like during their in-flight as well as on-the-ground experience,” said Pilon. “We need to do that with the customers so that we can start building and
providing offerings around it.”
Once an entity gets equipped with a full picture of what all the possibilities are, it would be fairly evident where the ancillary revenue generation opportunities are
going to be. “We then need to see how we can build that into the in-path flight
booking process. We can generate many ancillary revenues from anything related to
what our personal needs are when we leave home until we come back and after
(sharing our experience in social media). From a shoeshine, to a valet car wash, to groceries delivered at home, to adventure and organized tours, to online and in-flight
shopping (commissions) and duty free, streaming music or films. The opportunities
are endless,” said Pilon. He said there is a need to design the process first and worry
about the (reservation) systems after, otherwise we will find too many obstacles as to why this cannot be done.
- Clear value proposition: An airline needs to balance these two aspects – being
customer centric and the opportunity to monetize the entire customer experience path. “Ultimately there should not be a conflict between the two, but today that is
still the case because we complicated choice and pre-packaged bundles (branded
fares),” said Pilon.
Citing an example, he said: “If I am a top tier member at an airline but slip to a lower level in one year because I start flying more to areas where my home carrier
cannot take me I get penalized. For example, not only could I lose priority access but
also am I now required to pay for seat selection when I happen to find a low fare
with restrictions. The loyalty program considers a period of 12 months as a yardstick for customer value, whereas the rest of the departments may be concerned with my
life-time value.” In a way, the current loyalty programs can create a reverse spiral as
multiple penalties and punitive actions remove the incentive to keep on flying with
that carrier.
Another example of monetization that has a negative value proposition is redemption
travel. Pilon pointed out that some airlines add a significant amount of artificial fees
and surcharges to a redemption ticket that makes them as expensive as just purchasing your ticket (with the difference that you can keep your points for other
purposes).
“I recently had this trying to redeem a ticket from Montreal to London. It would cost
CAD 897 in fees plus 80,000 points (my balance was 210,000 miles) while I was able to purchase a ticket on www.aircanada.ca for CAD 954, taxes included. That did not
make any sense and shows how silo-driven monetization undermines intimacy. In
sum, and given the psychology of pricing, the price points of ancillary (seat selection)
should be in line with the price of the base fare. A seat selection fee of $49 on a $129 fare is off-putting,” explained Pilon. Alternatively, one should simplify revenue
management and optimize ancillary. “Today, we are trying to revenue manage seat
selection and seats separately independent on base fare levels for economy class.
The value proposition is confusing and difficult to understand for customers and it
undermines intimacy, customer experience and loyalty,” said Pilon.
- Charging aptly for a service: Pilon recommends that airlines should avoid all
conflicts that arise from charging for a specific service if that is in conflict with the
overall importance or value proposition for that customer group.
He mentioned that some ancillary revenues today are punitive (bringing carry-on
bags on board), others value added propositions (e.g. upgrade). “You can argue
that seat selection fees become punitive as and when more and more people pay
for this, because people are not paying a fee for the seat location they prefer but for the guarantee that they do not end up in a middle seat. It is a very different
proposition,” said Pilon.
And since it involves people, it is a sensitive area.
“In my view, we will not get it right until we involve regular customers and address both
ancillary service fees/prices in coordination with base fares. The customers look at the
overall outlay of cash and sacrifices to see if it is consistent and reasonable. They do not
do this mental exercise for each item in isolation. For many airlines, this may require a break-down of the traditional airline management structure so that a full commercial
optimization-based process can be designed and implemented,” said Pilon. This will
become more important as we include other ancillary services beyond the flight/ hotel/
insurance/ car rental.
Dig deeper: Airlines are prioritizing their members in the top tiers of the loyalty
program and are looking at ways to integrate the various touchpoints with a customer,
from booking to deplaning and baggage retrieval. Some airlines are also installing
additional software functions that allow airline lounge employees to retrieve more details about key customers when they interact with them (such as history of past issues, lost
luggage, or special status and recognition). As a result and because airlines are looking
into offering more choice, airlines are also reassessing the required functionality in their
core reservation systems.
However, as Pilon said, the initiatives of airlines regarding relevant offerings based on
current or past transactions are not yet integrated with overall marketing and reflects
the silo-based departmental structure behind the scenes.
“As frequent fliers, we get conflicting offerings and they are often still irrelevant because
we are not studied as individuals, only as segments,” said Pilon. “In addition, as long as
the approach of all airline staff towards (frequent) fliers depends on cabin class the customer happens to be sitting in or on what they read of a passenger manifest or their
loyalty card, the overall perception of intimacy will not improve until it is consistent both
offline and online.”
Also going back to what I suggested initially regarding the enhanced meal, Pilon also believes that the timing of offerings does not match the timing expectations of the
customer.
Overall, Pilon does believe that airlines recognize that there is a tremendous wealth of information that can be captured and that suggestive selling will depend on predictive
and prescriptive analytics. “In the latter case, we can think of things the customer may
want before they realize or think about it (adapters, SIM card Wi-Fi access throughout
their trip, cloud-based travel planning and offers of stores on location at any stage for
the duration of the trip),” he said. According to him, the question is not what information
we can read in the data, but which specific question we are looking to find an answer for using analytics.
“Otherwise, we can lose the big picture in big data,” he said.
The airlines are at the cross-roads of identifying new opportunities but will need careful
design of how it will be presented to customers in day-to-day transactions.
Ricardo V. Pilon, CEO, Millennium Aviation, is track chairman for the upcoming Ancillary Merchandising Conference, a part of Airline Information’s Loyalty, Ancillary & Co-Brand
Conferences - Mega Event Asia-Pacific 2014, scheduled to take place in Singapore
(August 20 – 21).
==