27
INVISIBLE WORK ACCESSIBILITY what How Blind Employees Manage Accessibility in Mixed-Ability Workplaces what The of Stacy Branham @branhammertime Shaun Kane @shaunkane

The Invisible Work of Accessibility (ASSETS 2015)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The Invisible Work of Accessibility (ASSETS 2015)

INVISIBLE WORK ACCESSIBILITY whatH o w B l i n d E m p l o y e e s M a n a g e Accessibility in Mixed-Ability Workplaces what

Theof

Stacy Branham @branhammertime

Shaun Kane @shaunkane

Page 2: The Invisible Work of Accessibility (ASSETS 2015)

MOTIVATION

Page 3: The Invisible Work of Accessibility (ASSETS 2015)

Parsa’s deskhis computer,

with NVDA

his earbuds

his keyboard

Page 4: The Invisible Work of Accessibility (ASSETS 2015)

how do people who are blind manage accessibility in (social) workplace settings?

Page 5: The Invisible Work of Accessibility (ASSETS 2015)

stigma and AT adoption (Shinohara & Wobbrock; 2011)

collaboration on navigation tasks (Williams, Galbraith, Kane, Hurst; 2014)

collaborative access in the home (Branham & Kane; 2015)

prior worksome are beginning to explore social context

Page 6: The Invisible Work of Accessibility (ASSETS 2015)

STUDY

Page 7: The Invisible Work of Accessibility (ASSETS 2015)

participantswe explored workplace accessibility with five blind participants and some of their sighted colleagues

25

Mol

lyre

sear

ch

assi

stan

t

29M

ary

atto

rney

39

Dary

llcu

stom

er

serv

ice

rep.

54

Cath

erin

epr

ogra

m

anal

yst

Wal

lace

exec

utiv

e di

rect

or

48

Page 8: The Invisible Work of Accessibility (ASSETS 2015)

interviews & observationsresearch was carried out in three phases: an initial interview, workplace walkthrough, & final interview

interview office walkthrough + follow-up survey

interview

Page 9: The Invisible Work of Accessibility (ASSETS 2015)

data & analysis

30+ hours audio

we conducted a qualitative thematic analysis on interview audio, photos, surveys, field notes, etc.

9 themes, 34 sub-themes183 pictures

10 surveys

Page 10: The Invisible Work of Accessibility (ASSETS 2015)

FINDINGS

Page 11: The Invisible Work of Accessibility (ASSETS 2015)

inaccess has social

implications

sociality has access implications

access work was “invisible” to colleagues(Suchman; 1995)

Page 12: The Invisible Work of Accessibility (ASSETS 2015)

inaccess has social

implications

sociality has access implications

access work was “invisible” to colleagues

Page 13: The Invisible Work of Accessibility (ASSETS 2015)

Wallaceexecutive director

48Maryattorney 29

inaccess in the workplaceinaccessibility had negative social implications

“Your perception from the outside is [my colleague] returns your calls, and I don’t.”

Page 14: The Invisible Work of Accessibility (ASSETS 2015)

inaccess has social

implications

access work was “invisible” to colleagues

sociality has access implications

Page 15: The Invisible Work of Accessibility (ASSETS 2015)

sociality had negative accessibility implications what

39 Daryllcustomer service rep.

access as a social matter

25Mollyresearch assistant

“What I hate is o t h e r p e o p l e moving your crap all over the place.”

“It’s interruptive t o k e e p t h e VoiceOver on… so, I’ll turn it off.”

Page 16: The Invisible Work of Accessibility (ASSETS 2015)

access work was “invisible” to colleagues

inaccess has social

implications

sociality has access implications

Page 17: The Invisible Work of Accessibility (ASSETS 2015)

X

25%

invisible work sighted colleagues were largely unaware of accessibility challenges present in the office

Page 18: The Invisible Work of Accessibility (ASSETS 2015)

47%

?

invisible work sighted colleagues were largely unaware of accessibility challenges present in the office

Page 19: The Invisible Work of Accessibility (ASSETS 2015)

9%

invisible work sighted colleagues were largely unaware of accessibility challenges present in the office

Page 20: The Invisible Work of Accessibility (ASSETS 2015)

Maryattorney 29

“I am surprised at how much [ m y s i g h t e d colleague] didn’t realize.”

invisible work blind workers felt the need to communicate challenges to educate sighted coworkers

25Mollyresearch assistant

“If it takes me longer… it is not because I am incompetent or… lazy.… I have had to learn, tha t communicate , communicate.”

Page 21: The Invisible Work of Accessibility (ASSETS 2015)

Wallaceexecutive director

48

“Social networking offers one kind of answer to [sharing tips and tricks with other blind people].”

seeking supportsometimes the best solution to an accessibility problem was asking someone else for help

Maryattorney

29

“I don’t want to be too difficult and seem like I’m complaining… and it’s not really important to work….”

Page 22: The Invisible Work of Accessibility (ASSETS 2015)

inaccess has social

implications

sociality has access implications

access work was “invisible” to colleagues

Page 23: The Invisible Work of Accessibility (ASSETS 2015)

TAKEAWAYS

Page 24: The Invisible Work of Accessibility (ASSETS 2015)

accessible technology does not imply accessibility what1we need to probe sociotechnical environments and test devices in the wild

design provocation

Page 25: The Invisible Work of Accessibility (ASSETS 2015)

2design provocation

problems that matter less may actually matter more what

we need to design for access to “non-essential” activities in the workplace

Page 26: The Invisible Work of Accessibility (ASSETS 2015)

3design provocation

cross-ability collaboration is a form ofcross-cultural communication whatwe need to design more unifying, transparent experiences and tools that encourage dialogue between blind and sighted colleagues

Page 27: The Invisible Work of Accessibility (ASSETS 2015)

thanks

Shaun Kane University of Colorado Boulder [email protected]@shaunkane superhuman.cs.colorado.edu

Stacy Branham University of Maryland Baltimore County

[email protected] @branhammertime stacybranham.com

NSF (IIS-1353312)

tinyurl.com/assets2015slides