57
The Evolution of Google Rankings How Google’s algorithm has changed over the years and where it’s heading in the future Rand Fishkin, SEOmoz CEO, March 2011

The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Rand Fishkin's presentation from Be Wizard, San Marino 2011 on the evolution of Google's rankings and how marketers can optimize for the next generation of ranking signals.

Citation preview

Page 1: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

The Evolution of Google RankingsHow Google’s algorithm has changed over the years

and where it’s heading in the future

Rand Fishkin, SEOmoz CEO, March 2011

Page 2: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

At SEOmoz, we make SOFTWARE!! We don’t offer any consulting.

Page 3: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Ranking in Google: 1999-2002

Page 4: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

On-Page Optimization

http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.htmlhttp://www.seomoz.org/blog/perfecting-keyword-targeting-on-page-optimization

Page 5: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

PageRank

http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.htmlhttp://www.elliance.com/aha/infographics/Google-PageRank-Explained.aspx

Page 6: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

PageRank

http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.htmlhttp://www.seomoz.org/blog/the-science-of-ranking-correlations

Page 7: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Ranking in Google: 2003 - 2005

Page 8: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Anchor Text

http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.htmlhttp://www.seomoz.org/learn-seo/anchor-text

Page 9: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html

From 1999 – 2008, What Page Ranked #1for the Queries “Exit” and “Leave”?

http://searchengineland.com/google-kills-bushs-miserable-failure-search-other-google-bombs-10363

Page 10: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html

From 1999 – 2008, What Page Ranked #1for the Queries “Exit” and “Leave”?

http://searchengineland.com/google-kills-bushs-miserable-failure-search-other-google-bombs-10363

Page 11: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Keyword Match Domain Names

http://www.seomoz.org/blog/exact-match-domains-are-far-too-powerful-is-their-time-limited

Page 12: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Registration & Historical Information

http://www.seobythesea.com/?p=1121

Page 13: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Topic Modeling

http://www.seomoz.org/blog/content-optimization-revisiting-topic-modeling-lda-our-labs-tool

LDA correlates w/ Google rankings

better than any other on-page feature

Page 14: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Ranking in Google: 2006 - 2009

Page 15: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Domain Authority

http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.htmlhttp://www.seomoz.org/blog/whiteboard-friday-domain-authority-page-authority-metrics

Page 16: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Diversity of External Link Sources

http://www.seomoz.org/blog/10-illustrations-on-search-engines-valuation-of-links

Page 17: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Nofollow, Sitemaps & Webmaster Tools

http://www.seomoz.org/blog/google-says-yes-you-can-still-sculpt-pagerank-no-you-cant-do-it-with-nofollow

Page 18: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Search Quality Raters

http://www.seobook.com/archives/000915.shtml

Page 19: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Ranking in Google: 2009 - 2011

Page 20: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Twitter Data

http://searchengineland.com/what-social-signals-do-google-bing-really-count-55389

Danny Sullivan: If an article is retweeted or referenced much in Twitter, do you count that as a signal outside of finding any non-nofollowed links that may naturally result from it?

Google: Yes, we do use it as a signal. It is used as a signal in our organic and news rankings. We also use it to enhance our news universal by marking how many people shared an article

Page 21: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Twitter Data

http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.htmlhttp://www.seomoz.org/blog/how-do-tweets-influence-search-rankings-an-experiment-for-a-cause

Page A646 links from 36 root domains

2 tweets

Page B1 link from 1 root domain

522 tweets

Page 22: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Twitter Clearly Influencing Google

http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.htmlhttp://www.seomoz.org/blog/how-do-tweets-influence-search-rankings-an-experiment-for-a-cause

Page A646 links from 36 root domains

2 tweets

Page B1 link from 1 root domain

522 tweets

Page B – the tweeted version –

ranks #1!

Page 23: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Twitter Data is Very Powerful in QDF

http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.htmlhttp://www.seomoz.org/blog/tweets-effect-rankings-unexpected-case-study

Page 24: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Don’t Try Abusing Twitter for SEO

http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.htmlhttp://www.seomoz.org/blog/tweets-effect-rankings-unexpected-case-study#jtc133590

Page 25: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Author Authority

http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.htmlhttp://searchengineland.com/what-social-signals-do-google-bing-really-count-55389

Danny Sullivan: Do you try to calculate the authority of someone who tweets that might be assigned to their Twitter page. Do you try to “know,” if you will, who they are?

Google: Yes we do compute and use author quality. We don’t know who anyone is in real life :-)

Bing: Yes. We do calculate the authority of someone who tweets. For known public figures or publishers, we do associate them with who they are. (For example, query for Danny Sullivan)

Page 26: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Facebook Likes & Shares

http://www.seomoz.org/blog/facebook-marketing-ultimate-guide

Page 27: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Brand Signals

http://www.seomoz.org/blog/the-next-generation-of-ranking-signals

Brands Generics

• Have real people working at a physical address

• Have authentic, followed social accounts

• Display obvious, robust contact information

• Register with government/civic organizations

• Receive traffic from diverse sources

• Generate branded search query volume

• Run offline marketing/advertising campaigns

• Often exist only online

• Rarely have significant social accounts

• Frequently use email forms only

• Stay “under the radar”

• Search is often 90%+ of traffic

• Have little-no branded search demand

• Ignore the offline world

Page 28: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Entity Association

http://www.seomoz.org/blog/the-next-generation-of-ranking-signals

Page 29: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

User & Usage Behavior

http://www.quora.com/Did-Bing-intentionally-copy-Googles-search-results

Page 30: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

How the Search Ranking Factors Have Changed in the Eyes of Experts

Page 31: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

http://www.seomoz.org/article/search-ranking-factors

Page 32: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

New data will be available on SEOmoz in April, 2011

Page 33: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Big Changes from 2009 to 2011

The new version of the ranking factors will be online in April, 2011

• Link-Based Factors are no longer 60%+ of the equation!

• Social Data is perceived to be a significant player

• Page-Level Link Metrics Fell the Most (43% - 22%)

• Keyword-Level Domain Metrics, Brand Data + Social Rose

• The Survey itself asked for more detail/specificity(which may be responsible for some of these shifts)

Page 34: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

A Look at Google’s “Farmer”(aka “Panda”) Update

Page 35: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Sites that Lost Visibility

http://www.seomoz.org/blog/googles-farmer-update-analysis-of-winners-vs-losers

Page 36: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Sites that Gained Visibility

http://www.seomoz.org/blog/googles-farmer-update-analysis-of-winners-vs-losers

Page 37: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

From the Mouths of Googlers

http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2011/03/the-panda-that-hates-farms/all/1

Wired.com: How do you recognize a shallow-content site?

Singhal: (W)e asked the raters questions like: “Would you be comfortable giving this site your credit card? Would you be comfortable giving medicine prescribed by this site to your kids?”

Cutts: (Using) a rigorous set of questions, everything from. “Do you consider this site to be authoritative? Would it be okay if this was in a magazine? Does this site have excessive ads?”

Singhal: And based on that, we basically formed some definition of what could be considered low quality.

Page 38: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

From the Mouths of Googlers

http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2011/03/the-panda-that-hates-farms/all/1

Wired.com: But how do you implement that algorithmically?

Cutts: I think you look for signals that recreate that same intuition, that same experience that you have as an engineer and that users have.

Singhal: You can imagine in a hyperspace a bunch of points, some points are red, some points are green, and in others there’s some mixture. Your job is to find a plane which says that most things on this side of the place are red, and most of the things on that side of the plane are the opposite of red.

Page 39: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Links Didn’t Seem to Have Much Impact

http://www.seomoz.org/blog/googles-farmer-update-analysis-of-winners-vs-losers

Page 40: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

How Google’s Interface Has Evolved

Page 41: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Old Google SERPs

Page 42: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Google SERPs Today

Page 43: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Google SERPs Tomorrow

Page 44: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

How Search Marketers Can Evolve

Page 45: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Don’t “Look” Like a Content Farm

http://www.suite101.com/content/canada-awarded-fifa-2015-womens-world-cup-of-soccerfootball-a356303

Page 46: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Don’t “Look” Like a Content Farm

http://hubpages.com/hub/WomensFashionsofthe1920-FlappersandtheJazz-Age

Page 47: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Watch Out for “Classic” SEO Tactics

It’s great to do good SEO, just don’t look like the only reason the site exists is to draw Google traffic

Directory Link Building

Sitewide, Footer Links

Low Cost/Quality, Outsourced Content

Keyword Stuffed Titles + Pages

Anchor-Text Rich Internal Links

Navigation for Engines, Not Humans

Generic Design and Layout

Anonymous Contact Forms

Ad Blocks Dominating the Page

Reciprocal Link Pages Paid Links w/ Manipulative Anchor Text

Keyword-Variant Abuse

Page 48: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Become a “Brand”

http://www.seomoz.org/blog/the-next-generation-of-ranking-signals

Brands Generics

• Have real people working at a physical address

• Have authentic, followed social accounts

• Display obvious, robust contact information

• Register with government/civic organizations

• Receive traffic from diverse sources

• Generate branded search query volume

• Run offline marketing/advertising campaigns

• Often exist only online

• Rarely have significant social accounts

• Frequently use email forms only

• Stay “under the radar”

• Search is often 90%+ of traffic

• Have little-no branded search demand

• Ignore the offline world

Page 49: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Find Where Top Brands Earn Citations

http:/googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.htmlhttp://www.opensiteexplorer.org

Where do these brands earn their links?

Page 50: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Facebook page

Blippr?

Crunchbase profile

App profile on Blackberry

Twitter account

BusinessWeek Profile

Chrome Extension

Mashable Article

Investigate Brand “Mention” Sources

Page 51: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Focus on the User, But Don’t Forget the Engines

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/11/business/media/11search.html

Page 52: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Take Advantage of New Opportunities

http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/05/introducing-rich-snippets.html

Page 53: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Take Advantage of New Opportunities

http://www.9e3k.com/9e3k/monday-meme-yoda-spreads-some-9e3k-love/

Page 54: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Take Advantage of New Opportunities

http://outspokenmedia.com/social-media/quora-hipsters/

Page 55: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Embrace All of Inbound Marketing

Blogs + Blogging

Comment Marketing

News/Media/PRSEO

Social Networks

Word of Mouth

Q+A Sites

Forums

Online Video

Podcasting

Webinars

Research/White Papers

Infographics

Social Bookmarking

INBOUND MARKETING!(AKA all the “free” traffic sources)

Direct/Referring Links

Type-In Traffic

Email

Document Sharing

Page 56: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Q+ARand Fishkin, CEO & Co-Founder, SEOmoz

• Twitter: @randfish

• Blog: www.seomoz.org/blog

• Email: [email protected]

You can now try SEOmoz PRO Free!http://www.seomoz.org/freetrial

Page 57: The Evolution of Google's Rankings

Summary of This Presentation

The Evolution and Future of Google’s Rankings:

• Where Google’s Been in the Past (1999-2010)

• New Signals in Google: Social Media, User Data & Brand Signals

• The Evolution of the Search Engine Results Interface

• What Marketers Must Do to Keep Up with Google’s Evolution