Upload
jeremy-zweiacker
View
1.598
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Tech Prep Consortia will be reviewed on a rotating basis. This is an introduction to that process.
Citation preview
Oklahoma Tech Prep
Tech Prep Grant Revision ProcessQuarterly Technical Assistance Meeting | January 13, 2009
Revision Process
• Consortia have opportunity to re-evaluate• 3 Step Process• Online
– hopefully• Early Timeline• Early Timeline
Revision Process
• Evaluate Section– change/no change
• Revise• Quantify
– use data to tell the reasonuse data to tell the reason• Approve/Disapprove
Oklahoma Tech Prep
On-Site Review & Improvement ProcessQuarterly Technical Assistance Meeting | January 13, 2009
Review & Improvement Process
• Purpose– not a comparison– data driven
Roles & Responsibilities
• State Tech Prep Coordinator– before, during, after
• Tech Prep Consortium Coordinator– before, during, after
Consortia Self Analysis
• Key Data– Academic Outcomes Report
• Activities Review– Consortia Self Analysis
On-Site Review Timeline
• Four Weeks• Two Weeks • During the Reviewg
– logistics, discussion panel, debrief, commendations and strategies for gimprovement
Plan of Improvement
• Below Acceptable Standards• Custom to Consortia
Follow-up Visit
• 4-6 Weeks Following• Customized to Consortia
Sanctions
The Oklahoma Department of Career and T h l Ed ti ithh ldTechnology Education can withhold some or all of an entire local grant.
Team Member Responsibilities
• Successful Team Member Tips• Preparing for the Visit
FAQ’s
• Team Selection• Number Team Members• Who Serves• How Long• Determining the Agenda• Determining the Agenda
Tech Prep RFP
• College Credit, Career Majors, P t S i P f i lPreparatory Services, Professional Development, Accountability
• Strategic Plan• Advisory Committeey• Educational Partners
Tech Prep RFP
• Career Majors• Preparatory Services• Preparatory Services• Professional Development
– teachers, faculty, adminsteachers, faculty, admins– counselors
• Accountability• Coordination
Consortia Self Analysis
• Academic Outcomes Report• Consortia Self-Analysis
– Consortium Quality Indicators– Qualitative Evidence of Success
• Three LevelsThree Levels– exceed, meet, does not meet standards
Consortia Self Analysis
• SWOT Analysis• State Assistance
Sample Agenda
• Team Meeting, Celebrations, Discussion P l I t i d E l tiPanel, Interviews and Exploration, Working Lunch, Report Out, C d ti & St t i fCommendations & Strategies for Improvement, Conclusion
Questions
Roundtable
• What are your issues?• What are your questions?• How can we help you?p y
– conference calls
Next Meeting
• April 14• Mid Del Technology Center• 9:30 a.m.