27
Sax Appeal 11 th February 2011 [email protected]

Sax appeal final

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Sax appeal   final

Sax Appeal11th February 2011

[email protected]

Page 2: Sax appeal   final

Methodology

Monitor 35 billion websites.

Volume weighted towards Sax Appeal.

Mentions were categorised across 24 variables.

Page 3: Sax appeal   final

The total number of online mentions on the 10th February 2011 for Sax Appeal was

495

Page 4: Sax appeal   final

This means Sax Appeal was mentioned on average

45times an hour during the sale of Sax Appeal in South Africa.

Page 5: Sax appeal   final

This amounted to a total reach of

2 746 195times an hour during the sale of Sax Appeal in South Africa.

Page 6: Sax appeal   final

Which equates to approximately

R621 606of free online advertising. This is the amount Sax Appeal earned media on the 10th February 2011 just through their online conversation. A leading mobile manufacturer earned on average R 44 425 a day.

Page 7: Sax appeal   final

HOW?

Page 8: Sax appeal   final

8.6% of the conversation generated by Sax Appeal on the day was from an influential source (1000 or more followers). Credible conversation has the ability to increase the impact and reach of the event online.

Page 9: Sax appeal   final

How was thisbroken down…

Page 10: Sax appeal   final

Consumers dominated the online conversation contributing to

98%of the total conversation.

Page 11: Sax appeal   final

In moredetail…

Page 12: Sax appeal   final

The graph shows the media sources for Sax Appeal’s online conversation.

Consumers drove almost all the conversation around the event.

Page 13: Sax appeal   final

But whatexactly arethey saying?

Page 14: Sax appeal   final
Page 15: Sax appeal   final

30.5% of the total conversation made use of the #saxappeal.

Page 16: Sax appeal   final
Page 17: Sax appeal   final

Interestingly,

Page 18: Sax appeal   final

88% of the total conversation was from Twitter. This shows the importance of a well established Twitter account to drive conversation.

Page 19: Sax appeal   final

Did the online

conversation really

benefit charity?

Page 20: Sax appeal   final

3.4% of the total conversation centered around Sax Appeal being for charity.

Page 21: Sax appeal   final
Page 22: Sax appeal   final

The total conversation was directed to the following platforms.

Page 23: Sax appeal   final

So who are the main authors?

Page 24: Sax appeal   final
Page 25: Sax appeal   final
Page 26: Sax appeal   final

Summary

Consumers/individuals drove 98% of conversation about Sax Appeal

and proves how influential individuals can be.

Twitter was the most dominant platform to speak about Sax Appeal

and therefore is a powerful medium to create hype for the day.

Many users saw Sax Appeal as a fun day for students with little

thought given to its objective of charity.

Page 27: Sax appeal   final

BrandsEye is an online reputation management service which focuses on real-time monitoring and managing of corporate reputations in the digital space.

For More Information:

Contact Tim Shier on 021 462 7353

Email the Team on [email protected]

Contact us on Twitter @brandseye

Or go to our website: www.brandseye.com