Upload
rodmadri
View
67
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Closing Programs
mySAP ERP – The New GL
SAP AG 2003, Title of Presentation, Speaker Name / 2
New Programs in the Closing Operations
The closing operations in FI affect The foreign currency valuation of open items and monthly
balances (SAPF100> FAGL_FC_VALUATION),
Translation (FAGL_FC_TRANSLATION)
Grouping (SAPF101 > FAGL_CL_REGROUP),
Other valuations (old: SAPF107V, SAPF103 and SAPF104)
WE/RE accounts clearing (old: RFWERE00).
Balance carry-over (old: SAPFVGTR)
Balance sheet and P&L adjustment (SAPF180 and SAPF181) are removed.
The valuations are generally made via a valuation area.
SAP AG 2003, Title of Presentation, Speaker Name / 3
The Valuation Area
Assignment in Customizing:
Valuation Area > Accounting Principle > Ledger Group
1 : 1 : 1
The valuations are performed per valuation area.
The valuation area controls the account determination and the valuation method (only FAGL_FC_VALUATION)and thus the determination of the exchange rate type.
The Accounting Principle determines the Ledger Group. This concerns FAGL_FC_VALUATION, FAGL_FC_TRANSLATION, FAGL_CL_REGROUP and SAPF107V.
SAP AG 2003, Title of Presentation, Speaker Name / 4
Open Items Valuations
The most important changes are: The history is recorded in table FAGL_BSBW_HISTRY
No more “updates” to valuated items (BDIFF)Always: Adjustment posting and reversal posting
No consideration of RDIFF at the time of the valuation
Default: Remeasurement procedure according to FASB52 / IAS21.(refer to the example on the next slide)
Transfer of the valuation differences to CO (always when valuation accounts are created as a cost element)
SAP AG 2003, Title of Presentation, Speaker Name / 5
Example: LC1 = EUR LC2 = USD
Posting to be evaluated:
Amount TC Amount LC1 Amount LC2
100 CAD 160 EUR 120 USD (Posting exchange rate: 1 EUR = 0.75 USD)
Valuation for the exchange rate 1 CAD -> 1.50 EUR TYPE M1 EUR -> 1.20 USD TYPE B
ERD amount TC ERD amount LC1 ERD amount LC2 0 -10 -12
Comment:The calculation (TYPE B) of the valuation amount LC2 (-12) is not carried out from the conversion of the posting amount LC1 (160 EUR),
That would be: 160 x 1.20 = 192192 – 120 = + 72 (calculated exchange rate difference)
but from the direct conversion of the valuation amount LC1 (-10 x 1.20) to the valuation amount LC2 (-12). Also TYPE B.
Remeasurement
Direct c
onversion
(remeasurement)
SAP AG 2003, Title of Presentation, Speaker Name / 6
Is Remeasurement Always Used?
Example: Countries with high inflation During posting, LC2 and LC3 are usually both determined by
conversion from LC1.
No remeasurement, if it is specified in Customizing (OB22) that LC2 or LC3 is to be converted from the transaction currency during the posting ( TC: 100 CAD) (switch value 1, relevant for countries with high inflation because TC1 is subject to a strong influence from inflation).
Time of the valuation:If switch value 1 is set, then no update to ERD-LC2 or ERD-LC3, because the conversion from the ERD-LC1 posting amount would not be meaningful.(Refer to the example on the next slide).
SAP AG 2003, Title of Presentation, Speaker Name / 7
Example: LC1 = EUR LC2 = USD
Posting to be evaluated:
Amount TC Amount LC1 Amount LC2
100 CAD 160 EUR 120 USD (Exchange rate: 1 EUR = 0.75 USD)
Valuation for the exchange rate 1 CAD -> 1.50 EUR TYPE M1 EUR -> 1.20 USD TYPE B
ERD amount TC ERD amount LC1 ERD amount LC2 0 -10 no entry
Comment: ERD-LC1 (-10) is determined “normally”, ERD-LC2 is not determined, because LC1 for example, represents a high inflation currency, which would not be very meaningful for the determination of ERD-LC2.In this case an extra run is conceivable, which specifically determines ERD- LC2 from the comparison of posting–TC und - LC2 and the valuation exchange rate CAD – USD.
No Remeasurement, if...
No remeasurement
SAP AG 2003, Title of Presentation, Speaker Name / 8
Initial situation: 2 documents posted in foreign currency USD: FC= Foreign currency, TC = Transaction currency
Document 1: Post.date 01/01/2005 , Posting exchange rate: 0.8
Account TC :USD LC: EUR Segment
Bank clearing 400 - 320 - S1
Bank 400 320 S1
Document 2: Post.date 02/01/2003, posting exchange rate: 1.1
Bank clearing 600 - 660 - S2
Bank 600 660 S2
Balance Valuation
Bank Bank clearing
400 / 320 S1600 / 660 S2
400- / 320- S1600- / 660- S2
Balance valuation account bank for 03/31/2005, valuation rate 0.9
Valuation per account: TC 1000 LC 980Valuation amount: 900Valuation difference: - 80
>Segment distribution at the ratio 400 : 600 >Valuation difference S1: - 32Valuation difference S2: - 48
Valuation per segment Segment 1 TC 400 LC 320Valuation amount: 360Valuation difference S1: + 40
Segment 2 TC 600 LC 660Valuation amount: 540Valuation difference S2: - 120
- 80
Different segment values (company code oriented or segment oriented value determination):
Account balance after posting
Preferred not supporte
d
SAP AG 2003, Title of Presentation, Speaker Name / 9
FAGL_FC_TRANSLATION
Evaluation of balance sheet/P&L areas (example: reporting currency TC2 USD)1. Translation happens at totals level (possible for all types of G/L accounts)2. Account determination happens via valuation area and financial statement version
Example: TC1 EUR TC2 USD
Orig. document 160 120 Remeasurement -10 -12
________ ________Account balances 150 108
Translation: What is the value of LC1 (EUR) in reporting currency (USD) per key date?(LC1 evaluated with key data exchange rate 1 EUR = 1.20 USD)
(150 X 1.20 = 180) value to be achievedRequired adjustment posting + 72 to get key date value
Asset accounts are evaluated with the historical exchange rate, P&L accounts are evaluated with the weighted exchange rate (corresponding exchange rate type in table TCURR must be maintained).
Translation (FASB52/IAS21)
SAP AG 2003, Title of Presentation, Speaker Name / 10
Regroup Customers with Credit Balances etc...
Receivables Correction Payables
100 100-
Transfer posting customer with credit balance
a) Company code view/without segment examination
Initial situation:
Receivables_______________________
50 – S1
50 S2
100 - S3
Receivables Correction Payables
50 S1 50- S1
b) Company code view / with segment examination
50- S2 50 S2
100 S3 100- S3
Receivables Correction Payables
50 S1 50- S1
c) Without company code view/segment examination only
100 S3 100- S3
Preferred solution!Company code determines the depiction of accounts.Positive payables (50,– S2)are accepted
Segment reports not possible
Total payables (150-)do not correspond to thecompany code view (100-)