Upload
ilri
View
943
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The Proof of Concept risk analysis studies are showing the usefulness of par8cipatory methods in risk assessment and many examples of the applica8on are being generated.
Safe food, fair food (BMZ/ILRI)
We are finding significant threats of animal source foods for public health in sub-‐Saharan Africa which have to be mi8gated immediately through risk communica8ons and risk managements.
Makita, K., Grace, D., Randolph, T.F., Baker, D. and Staal, S. MK03, Improving Market Opportunities Theme, ILRI
Building capacity to improve the safety of animal-‐source foods and ensure con8nued market access for poor farmers in sub-‐Saharan Africa
OBJECTIVES: This project aims to establish the capacity for the sustained promotion of risk-based approaches to improve food safety and participation of the poor in informal markets for livestock products in sub-Saharan Africa.
ACHIEVEMENTS: We are in the third year and the results of the situational analysis related with food-borne zoonoses were presented in national workshops with stakeholders of food safety in most of the study countries. The risks prioritized in each country are being assessed as shown in Figure 1.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: This project is funded by BMZ/ILRI. Also, a Kenyan study is partly supported by PSDA/BMZ. Two other Kenyan and two Tanzanian studies are partly funded by ASARECA. The Ethiopian study is partly supported by the Italian Embassy. We thank these donors.
KEY FINDINGS: Participatory methods are powerful tools for food safety risk assessment in sub-Saharan Africa. The applications of such methods are being explored by students (Figure 2). The impacts of this project are already significant and the number of studies increased from 4 (in 2008) to 18.
DIFFICULTIES FACED: Participatory methods are being explored by the students at the institutes with experience in participatory appraisals. However, for the other students based in the veterinary or food science institutes without such experience, it was hard for them to become familiar with the participatory ideas in risk analysis. We are supporting these students at several stages to promote participatory methods. Initially the risk analysis training included stochastic modelling; however such statistics were too advanced to learn in a short period and deterministic modelling is being used.
Figure 2: Most common flow of participatory risk analysis (participatory methods shown in red)
Identification of biological critical control points
Literature review Fault tree
Identification of quantitative value chain
Probability selection of communities Participatory rural appraisal (PRA) Rapid rural appraisal (RRA) Key-informant interviews (KII)
Biological sampling
Sampling and diagnoses Questionnaires PRA, RRA, KII
Risk assessment Risk communication
Focus group discussions National stakeholders' workshops
HACCP Hazard characterization Exposure assessment Risk Characterization Other statistics
Figure 1: Countries participating and the proof of concept risk analysis studies
Ethiopia • Staphylococcus aureus poisoning through milk consumption in Debre Zeit Kenya • E. coli contamination in cattle abattoirs • E. coli in beef value chain in Nairobi • Brucellosis in milk in Kasarani, Nairobi • Microbiological quality and pH of milk from smallholder farms in Nairobi and Eldoret Tanzania • S. aureus in milk in Dar es Salaam • Camplylobacter infection at nyama choma pubs in Arusha Mozambique • Prerequisites for HACCP in small scale poultry production in Maputo
Côte d’Ivoire • Contamination of informally marketed milk with several pathogens in Abidjan • Potential inhibition of pathogens by Bifidobacterium in marketed milk in Abidjan • Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in fish
Mali • One health risk analysis for brucellosis • Perception and motivations in food safety
Ghana • Listeria monocytogenes in milk in Accra South Africa • S. aureus in dried beef product in Pretoria • Food safety in tribal rituals • Impala game meat for exportation and informal marketing