Upload
sarah-jones
View
343
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Results of the Horizon 2020
DMP template survey
Ellen Leenarts
DANS amp OpenAIRE
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018
httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529
dansknaw
openaire_eu
Sarah Jones
DCC OpenAIRE amp FAIR
Data Expert GroupsjDCC
digitalcuration
FAIRdata
Background to the survey
bull Conducted by OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group between May-July 2017
bull Survey intended to help iterate and improve EC approach to DMPs
bull Asked about attitudes to DMPs and specifics on H2020 template and support needed
bull Circulated by EUDAT FOSTER amp other projects LIBER the RDA European
Commission project officers YEAR network and EURODOC
bull Received 289 responses
bull Around 50 were researchers and 60 were (also) research support
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 2
Infographic
3
bull Results at a glance
bull Available via
httpszenodoorgrecord1120245
Overall positive response to DMPs [Q3]
Both positive and negative it helped us reflect on potential issues and decide
how to address these as a project and also it was frustrating and felt like an
administrative exercise that was very long and cumbersome too specific in
some areas and too vague unclear in others
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 4
ldquoInitially it looks as an administrative exercise
but I find it very useful since although I have an
idea of what data I will collect in my project this
makes me reflect on the best format to present
them where to make them available etcrdquo
Good understanding of FAIR buthellip
ldquoWe understand the basic principle of FAIR but the terminology is often difficult
to grasp immediately Things could be explained better in plain languagerdquo
ldquoThe term interoperable is quite confusing sometimes and mixed with re-userdquo
ldquoI could do with help understanding the section on Making data interoperable
as I dont understand a number of the terms and conceptsrdquo
Table from Q4 comments from Q5
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 5
To what extent do the following statements represent your experience of using the H2020 template
Agree Neither agree nor disagree Disagree
I donrsquot understand what FAIR means 10 17 16 28 74 125
Language is a barrier [Q5]
Respondents mentioned
40 terms which were
unclear to them
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 6
ldquoResearchers are not familiar with the following termsphrases Metadata standards for
metadatadata ontologies mapping with ontologies interoperability All the ICT jargonrdquo
ldquoWith the help from Swedish National Data Service we could clarify many questions Without
this help we would not be able to finish the DMPrdquo
Template structure is problematic [Q6 amp 19]
ldquoThere is too much overlap between F A I and R
We have stopped talking about FAIR and removed
it from our replacement H2020 DMP templaterdquo
ldquoQuestions about the Metadata appear under 21
22 and 23rdquo
ldquoHaving to explain how to make data findable
before talking of the repositories chosen to make
data open is difficult and forces you to anticipate
things to be detailed laterrdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 7
bull Repetition
bull Ordering not logical
bull Too many precise questions
bull Need more dropdown options
and examples
User priorities for support [Q11]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 8
Our recommendations
1 Clarify EC requirements for DMPs
2 Revise the DMP template structure
3 Simplify the DMP content and terminology
4 Provide discipline-specific guidelines and example answers
5 Encourage the publishing of DMPs and collate examples
6 Facilitate the inclusion of RDM costs in grant applications
7 Improve DMP review practices and share guidelines
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 9
Experience with DMP template [Q4]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 10
Guidance that could be improved [Q7]
bull More subject- or field-
specific
bull Less complicated
technical or less vague
generic
bull Inclusion of examples
bull DMPs
bull Repositories
bull Interoperability
bull Cost estimation
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 11
Missing topics [Q8]
bull Discipline-specific approach
bull Access
bull Data quality assurance
bull Metadata and documentation
bull Software
bull Reproducibility
bull Costs
bull Storage
bull Legal issues
bull The format of the template
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 12
ldquoI think this would probably
vary according to individual
projects It is possible that a
one-size-fits-all approach is
not practicalrdquo
Issues encountered [Q9]
ldquoProcesses around the assessment of the
content are unclear to merdquo
ldquoAs stated before clarification of what is
an eligible cost regarding RDM is urgently
needed for researchers and also for the
RDM support teams at the universitiesrdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 13
Suggestions [Q10]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 14
ldquoWhich parts should be set up
already in the beginning and what
can be added later Would be
helpful to indicate needed and
nice to have for the starting point
or for different stagesrdquo
DMP publishing [Q12]
bull Half of free text answers rdquoYes ifhelliprdquo
bull Depending on confidentiality of the
information in the DMP
bull First reach a level of confidence in
publishing DMPs
bull The project has finished
bull No because it might bring project
partners in danger
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 15
Suggestions to EC [Q14]
ldquoTalk to researchers and ask them
whether the DMP requirements
are realistic Involve researchers
when developing disciplinary
guidancerdquo
ldquoFocus on technical exchange
format for these plans so they can
be shared between tools (ie
make the plans themselves FAIR)rdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 16
Providing feedback [Q15-16]
ldquoIn some cases I had to look together with researchers into their publications or WPs
description of a project in order to help them identify the type of data they are collecting in
order to include them in the DMP This exercise also helped them to identify which data might
have a re-use potential and which ones were submitted to special policies regulationsrdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 17
Time to review H2020 DMPs [Q18]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 18
27 said the H2020 process took much longer and was more complicated
based on 45 responses
19
Recommendationshellip
Image CC-BY-NC by Thomas Hawk
httpswwwflickrcomphotosthomashawk15634502093
1 Clarify EC requirements for DMPs
bull Collate all data-related and DMP guidelines in a single document
bull Provide public announcements and alerts to key groups when guidelines change
bull Be more explicit about when a DMP is and isnrsquot required
bull Clarify exactly what set of questions should be answered in DMPs
bull Provide a docx or rtf template to use as well as supporting online tools
httpeceuropaeuresearchparticipantsdatarefh2020grants_manualhioa_pilot
h2020-hi-oa-data-mgt_enpdf
2 Revise the DMP template structure
bull Regroup questions according to key activities and order in a more logical fashion
bull Identify which questions should be answered when
bull Where possible indicate secondary questions that can be skipped if not relevant
bull Include more yesno questions dropdown options or API integrations
bull Identify questions that will support evaluation and formulate them in a structured
way to enable automated compliance checks in future
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 21
3 Simplify DMP content amp terminology
bull Simplify the terminology used where possible
bull Provide a glossary of terms to assist researchers
bull Offer example answers particularly for questions with more technical terms
bull Seek to shorten the number of questions being asked
bull Provide some hierarchy or routing to the structuring of the questions
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 22
4 Discipline guidelines amp example answers
bull Provide discipline-specific guidelines
bull Offer example answers based on good practice in each domain
bull Give dropdown options or ranges pertinent to each field
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 23
We suggest that the EC builds on existing work and
collaborates with domain data centres and discipline-
specific groups such as learned societies
5 Publish DMPs and collate examples
bull Encourage projects to publish their DMPs
bull Offer a DMP registry service
bull Provide a library of lsquoapprovedrsquo DMPs representing
the range of funded research
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 24
Build on projectsrsquo existing willingness to publish and
work with external reviewers e-Infrastructure projects
and other groups eg LIBER to help approve examples
6 Include RDM costs in grant applications
bull Raise a few RDM questions alerts at the grant proposal stage
bull Provide worked examples that demonstrate what to include as RDM costs and how
bull Brief reviewers on eligible and expected costs
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 25
Clarification of what is an eligible cost regarding RDM is urgently needed for researchers
and also for the RDM support teams at the universities For example
bull If a project needs to buy extra storage from the own institution is that cost eligible
Or only external storage systems are eligible
bull Database curatorsadmins could be financed by EC projects
bull Are licenses for Electronic lab Notebooks (ELNs) for experimental data documentation
eligible costs
bull Are there differences in RDM eligible costs between consortium projects and IF or
ERC for example If there are differences it would be best if the EC provide examples
for all the type of calls
7 Explain DMP review practices
bull Endorse the internal assessment framework to ensure consistent use
bull Continue to provide internal training on reviewing DMPs in collaboration with
FOSTER Plus and other relevant groups
bull Develop circulate review guidelines and FAQs on practical implementation
bull Make a public statement on how DMPs are being reviewed ideally releasing the
assessment framework at the same time
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 26
Activities that may help
bull Science Europe Domain Data Protocols (DDPs)
bull Collections of example DMPs eg DCC RIOjournal Zenodo OpenAIRE
bull Existing costs guides eg LCRDM resource amp Wellcome guidance
bull Integrating registries into tools like DMPonline
bull RDA Working Group on Common standards for DMPs
bull Further support from FAIR Data EG OpenAIRE and others
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 27
What can you do
bull Share your DMP
ndash Publish in RIO - httpsriojournalcom
ndash Deposit in Zenodo - httpszenodoorg
ndash Add to DCC list - wwwdccacukshare-DMPs
bull Continue to provide feedback on the pilot and what works for you (or not)
bull Collaboration across research and support communities to develop your approach
bull Work with wider initiatives eg NOADs and international groups like RDA
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 28
Conclusions
Although there are several recommendations to the EC feedback was positive
bull Many found the process of developing a DMP a positive experience
bull Over half agree that the template was very useful
bull 19 of 68 stated they encountered no issues in following the EC guidelines
The EC has already iterated its open data guidelines and actively seeks input to
inform future policy developments
Further updates are likely The FAIR Data EG is to advise on future revisions of the
DMP template including the development of additional discipline specific guidance
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 29
Where to find out more
All the survey materials are on Zenodo
DOI 105281zenodo1120245
httpszenodoorgrecord1120245
bull Survey report
bull Raw data
bull Analysed dataset
bull Infographic
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 30
Acknowledgments
Marjan Grootveld DANS
Emilie Hermans UGent
Eliane Fankhauser DANS
Background to the survey
bull Conducted by OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group between May-July 2017
bull Survey intended to help iterate and improve EC approach to DMPs
bull Asked about attitudes to DMPs and specifics on H2020 template and support needed
bull Circulated by EUDAT FOSTER amp other projects LIBER the RDA European
Commission project officers YEAR network and EURODOC
bull Received 289 responses
bull Around 50 were researchers and 60 were (also) research support
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 2
Infographic
3
bull Results at a glance
bull Available via
httpszenodoorgrecord1120245
Overall positive response to DMPs [Q3]
Both positive and negative it helped us reflect on potential issues and decide
how to address these as a project and also it was frustrating and felt like an
administrative exercise that was very long and cumbersome too specific in
some areas and too vague unclear in others
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 4
ldquoInitially it looks as an administrative exercise
but I find it very useful since although I have an
idea of what data I will collect in my project this
makes me reflect on the best format to present
them where to make them available etcrdquo
Good understanding of FAIR buthellip
ldquoWe understand the basic principle of FAIR but the terminology is often difficult
to grasp immediately Things could be explained better in plain languagerdquo
ldquoThe term interoperable is quite confusing sometimes and mixed with re-userdquo
ldquoI could do with help understanding the section on Making data interoperable
as I dont understand a number of the terms and conceptsrdquo
Table from Q4 comments from Q5
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 5
To what extent do the following statements represent your experience of using the H2020 template
Agree Neither agree nor disagree Disagree
I donrsquot understand what FAIR means 10 17 16 28 74 125
Language is a barrier [Q5]
Respondents mentioned
40 terms which were
unclear to them
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 6
ldquoResearchers are not familiar with the following termsphrases Metadata standards for
metadatadata ontologies mapping with ontologies interoperability All the ICT jargonrdquo
ldquoWith the help from Swedish National Data Service we could clarify many questions Without
this help we would not be able to finish the DMPrdquo
Template structure is problematic [Q6 amp 19]
ldquoThere is too much overlap between F A I and R
We have stopped talking about FAIR and removed
it from our replacement H2020 DMP templaterdquo
ldquoQuestions about the Metadata appear under 21
22 and 23rdquo
ldquoHaving to explain how to make data findable
before talking of the repositories chosen to make
data open is difficult and forces you to anticipate
things to be detailed laterrdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 7
bull Repetition
bull Ordering not logical
bull Too many precise questions
bull Need more dropdown options
and examples
User priorities for support [Q11]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 8
Our recommendations
1 Clarify EC requirements for DMPs
2 Revise the DMP template structure
3 Simplify the DMP content and terminology
4 Provide discipline-specific guidelines and example answers
5 Encourage the publishing of DMPs and collate examples
6 Facilitate the inclusion of RDM costs in grant applications
7 Improve DMP review practices and share guidelines
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 9
Experience with DMP template [Q4]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 10
Guidance that could be improved [Q7]
bull More subject- or field-
specific
bull Less complicated
technical or less vague
generic
bull Inclusion of examples
bull DMPs
bull Repositories
bull Interoperability
bull Cost estimation
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 11
Missing topics [Q8]
bull Discipline-specific approach
bull Access
bull Data quality assurance
bull Metadata and documentation
bull Software
bull Reproducibility
bull Costs
bull Storage
bull Legal issues
bull The format of the template
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 12
ldquoI think this would probably
vary according to individual
projects It is possible that a
one-size-fits-all approach is
not practicalrdquo
Issues encountered [Q9]
ldquoProcesses around the assessment of the
content are unclear to merdquo
ldquoAs stated before clarification of what is
an eligible cost regarding RDM is urgently
needed for researchers and also for the
RDM support teams at the universitiesrdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 13
Suggestions [Q10]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 14
ldquoWhich parts should be set up
already in the beginning and what
can be added later Would be
helpful to indicate needed and
nice to have for the starting point
or for different stagesrdquo
DMP publishing [Q12]
bull Half of free text answers rdquoYes ifhelliprdquo
bull Depending on confidentiality of the
information in the DMP
bull First reach a level of confidence in
publishing DMPs
bull The project has finished
bull No because it might bring project
partners in danger
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 15
Suggestions to EC [Q14]
ldquoTalk to researchers and ask them
whether the DMP requirements
are realistic Involve researchers
when developing disciplinary
guidancerdquo
ldquoFocus on technical exchange
format for these plans so they can
be shared between tools (ie
make the plans themselves FAIR)rdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 16
Providing feedback [Q15-16]
ldquoIn some cases I had to look together with researchers into their publications or WPs
description of a project in order to help them identify the type of data they are collecting in
order to include them in the DMP This exercise also helped them to identify which data might
have a re-use potential and which ones were submitted to special policies regulationsrdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 17
Time to review H2020 DMPs [Q18]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 18
27 said the H2020 process took much longer and was more complicated
based on 45 responses
19
Recommendationshellip
Image CC-BY-NC by Thomas Hawk
httpswwwflickrcomphotosthomashawk15634502093
1 Clarify EC requirements for DMPs
bull Collate all data-related and DMP guidelines in a single document
bull Provide public announcements and alerts to key groups when guidelines change
bull Be more explicit about when a DMP is and isnrsquot required
bull Clarify exactly what set of questions should be answered in DMPs
bull Provide a docx or rtf template to use as well as supporting online tools
httpeceuropaeuresearchparticipantsdatarefh2020grants_manualhioa_pilot
h2020-hi-oa-data-mgt_enpdf
2 Revise the DMP template structure
bull Regroup questions according to key activities and order in a more logical fashion
bull Identify which questions should be answered when
bull Where possible indicate secondary questions that can be skipped if not relevant
bull Include more yesno questions dropdown options or API integrations
bull Identify questions that will support evaluation and formulate them in a structured
way to enable automated compliance checks in future
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 21
3 Simplify DMP content amp terminology
bull Simplify the terminology used where possible
bull Provide a glossary of terms to assist researchers
bull Offer example answers particularly for questions with more technical terms
bull Seek to shorten the number of questions being asked
bull Provide some hierarchy or routing to the structuring of the questions
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 22
4 Discipline guidelines amp example answers
bull Provide discipline-specific guidelines
bull Offer example answers based on good practice in each domain
bull Give dropdown options or ranges pertinent to each field
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 23
We suggest that the EC builds on existing work and
collaborates with domain data centres and discipline-
specific groups such as learned societies
5 Publish DMPs and collate examples
bull Encourage projects to publish their DMPs
bull Offer a DMP registry service
bull Provide a library of lsquoapprovedrsquo DMPs representing
the range of funded research
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 24
Build on projectsrsquo existing willingness to publish and
work with external reviewers e-Infrastructure projects
and other groups eg LIBER to help approve examples
6 Include RDM costs in grant applications
bull Raise a few RDM questions alerts at the grant proposal stage
bull Provide worked examples that demonstrate what to include as RDM costs and how
bull Brief reviewers on eligible and expected costs
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 25
Clarification of what is an eligible cost regarding RDM is urgently needed for researchers
and also for the RDM support teams at the universities For example
bull If a project needs to buy extra storage from the own institution is that cost eligible
Or only external storage systems are eligible
bull Database curatorsadmins could be financed by EC projects
bull Are licenses for Electronic lab Notebooks (ELNs) for experimental data documentation
eligible costs
bull Are there differences in RDM eligible costs between consortium projects and IF or
ERC for example If there are differences it would be best if the EC provide examples
for all the type of calls
7 Explain DMP review practices
bull Endorse the internal assessment framework to ensure consistent use
bull Continue to provide internal training on reviewing DMPs in collaboration with
FOSTER Plus and other relevant groups
bull Develop circulate review guidelines and FAQs on practical implementation
bull Make a public statement on how DMPs are being reviewed ideally releasing the
assessment framework at the same time
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 26
Activities that may help
bull Science Europe Domain Data Protocols (DDPs)
bull Collections of example DMPs eg DCC RIOjournal Zenodo OpenAIRE
bull Existing costs guides eg LCRDM resource amp Wellcome guidance
bull Integrating registries into tools like DMPonline
bull RDA Working Group on Common standards for DMPs
bull Further support from FAIR Data EG OpenAIRE and others
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 27
What can you do
bull Share your DMP
ndash Publish in RIO - httpsriojournalcom
ndash Deposit in Zenodo - httpszenodoorg
ndash Add to DCC list - wwwdccacukshare-DMPs
bull Continue to provide feedback on the pilot and what works for you (or not)
bull Collaboration across research and support communities to develop your approach
bull Work with wider initiatives eg NOADs and international groups like RDA
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 28
Conclusions
Although there are several recommendations to the EC feedback was positive
bull Many found the process of developing a DMP a positive experience
bull Over half agree that the template was very useful
bull 19 of 68 stated they encountered no issues in following the EC guidelines
The EC has already iterated its open data guidelines and actively seeks input to
inform future policy developments
Further updates are likely The FAIR Data EG is to advise on future revisions of the
DMP template including the development of additional discipline specific guidance
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 29
Where to find out more
All the survey materials are on Zenodo
DOI 105281zenodo1120245
httpszenodoorgrecord1120245
bull Survey report
bull Raw data
bull Analysed dataset
bull Infographic
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 30
Acknowledgments
Marjan Grootveld DANS
Emilie Hermans UGent
Eliane Fankhauser DANS
Infographic
3
bull Results at a glance
bull Available via
httpszenodoorgrecord1120245
Overall positive response to DMPs [Q3]
Both positive and negative it helped us reflect on potential issues and decide
how to address these as a project and also it was frustrating and felt like an
administrative exercise that was very long and cumbersome too specific in
some areas and too vague unclear in others
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 4
ldquoInitially it looks as an administrative exercise
but I find it very useful since although I have an
idea of what data I will collect in my project this
makes me reflect on the best format to present
them where to make them available etcrdquo
Good understanding of FAIR buthellip
ldquoWe understand the basic principle of FAIR but the terminology is often difficult
to grasp immediately Things could be explained better in plain languagerdquo
ldquoThe term interoperable is quite confusing sometimes and mixed with re-userdquo
ldquoI could do with help understanding the section on Making data interoperable
as I dont understand a number of the terms and conceptsrdquo
Table from Q4 comments from Q5
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 5
To what extent do the following statements represent your experience of using the H2020 template
Agree Neither agree nor disagree Disagree
I donrsquot understand what FAIR means 10 17 16 28 74 125
Language is a barrier [Q5]
Respondents mentioned
40 terms which were
unclear to them
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 6
ldquoResearchers are not familiar with the following termsphrases Metadata standards for
metadatadata ontologies mapping with ontologies interoperability All the ICT jargonrdquo
ldquoWith the help from Swedish National Data Service we could clarify many questions Without
this help we would not be able to finish the DMPrdquo
Template structure is problematic [Q6 amp 19]
ldquoThere is too much overlap between F A I and R
We have stopped talking about FAIR and removed
it from our replacement H2020 DMP templaterdquo
ldquoQuestions about the Metadata appear under 21
22 and 23rdquo
ldquoHaving to explain how to make data findable
before talking of the repositories chosen to make
data open is difficult and forces you to anticipate
things to be detailed laterrdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 7
bull Repetition
bull Ordering not logical
bull Too many precise questions
bull Need more dropdown options
and examples
User priorities for support [Q11]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 8
Our recommendations
1 Clarify EC requirements for DMPs
2 Revise the DMP template structure
3 Simplify the DMP content and terminology
4 Provide discipline-specific guidelines and example answers
5 Encourage the publishing of DMPs and collate examples
6 Facilitate the inclusion of RDM costs in grant applications
7 Improve DMP review practices and share guidelines
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 9
Experience with DMP template [Q4]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 10
Guidance that could be improved [Q7]
bull More subject- or field-
specific
bull Less complicated
technical or less vague
generic
bull Inclusion of examples
bull DMPs
bull Repositories
bull Interoperability
bull Cost estimation
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 11
Missing topics [Q8]
bull Discipline-specific approach
bull Access
bull Data quality assurance
bull Metadata and documentation
bull Software
bull Reproducibility
bull Costs
bull Storage
bull Legal issues
bull The format of the template
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 12
ldquoI think this would probably
vary according to individual
projects It is possible that a
one-size-fits-all approach is
not practicalrdquo
Issues encountered [Q9]
ldquoProcesses around the assessment of the
content are unclear to merdquo
ldquoAs stated before clarification of what is
an eligible cost regarding RDM is urgently
needed for researchers and also for the
RDM support teams at the universitiesrdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 13
Suggestions [Q10]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 14
ldquoWhich parts should be set up
already in the beginning and what
can be added later Would be
helpful to indicate needed and
nice to have for the starting point
or for different stagesrdquo
DMP publishing [Q12]
bull Half of free text answers rdquoYes ifhelliprdquo
bull Depending on confidentiality of the
information in the DMP
bull First reach a level of confidence in
publishing DMPs
bull The project has finished
bull No because it might bring project
partners in danger
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 15
Suggestions to EC [Q14]
ldquoTalk to researchers and ask them
whether the DMP requirements
are realistic Involve researchers
when developing disciplinary
guidancerdquo
ldquoFocus on technical exchange
format for these plans so they can
be shared between tools (ie
make the plans themselves FAIR)rdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 16
Providing feedback [Q15-16]
ldquoIn some cases I had to look together with researchers into their publications or WPs
description of a project in order to help them identify the type of data they are collecting in
order to include them in the DMP This exercise also helped them to identify which data might
have a re-use potential and which ones were submitted to special policies regulationsrdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 17
Time to review H2020 DMPs [Q18]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 18
27 said the H2020 process took much longer and was more complicated
based on 45 responses
19
Recommendationshellip
Image CC-BY-NC by Thomas Hawk
httpswwwflickrcomphotosthomashawk15634502093
1 Clarify EC requirements for DMPs
bull Collate all data-related and DMP guidelines in a single document
bull Provide public announcements and alerts to key groups when guidelines change
bull Be more explicit about when a DMP is and isnrsquot required
bull Clarify exactly what set of questions should be answered in DMPs
bull Provide a docx or rtf template to use as well as supporting online tools
httpeceuropaeuresearchparticipantsdatarefh2020grants_manualhioa_pilot
h2020-hi-oa-data-mgt_enpdf
2 Revise the DMP template structure
bull Regroup questions according to key activities and order in a more logical fashion
bull Identify which questions should be answered when
bull Where possible indicate secondary questions that can be skipped if not relevant
bull Include more yesno questions dropdown options or API integrations
bull Identify questions that will support evaluation and formulate them in a structured
way to enable automated compliance checks in future
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 21
3 Simplify DMP content amp terminology
bull Simplify the terminology used where possible
bull Provide a glossary of terms to assist researchers
bull Offer example answers particularly for questions with more technical terms
bull Seek to shorten the number of questions being asked
bull Provide some hierarchy or routing to the structuring of the questions
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 22
4 Discipline guidelines amp example answers
bull Provide discipline-specific guidelines
bull Offer example answers based on good practice in each domain
bull Give dropdown options or ranges pertinent to each field
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 23
We suggest that the EC builds on existing work and
collaborates with domain data centres and discipline-
specific groups such as learned societies
5 Publish DMPs and collate examples
bull Encourage projects to publish their DMPs
bull Offer a DMP registry service
bull Provide a library of lsquoapprovedrsquo DMPs representing
the range of funded research
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 24
Build on projectsrsquo existing willingness to publish and
work with external reviewers e-Infrastructure projects
and other groups eg LIBER to help approve examples
6 Include RDM costs in grant applications
bull Raise a few RDM questions alerts at the grant proposal stage
bull Provide worked examples that demonstrate what to include as RDM costs and how
bull Brief reviewers on eligible and expected costs
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 25
Clarification of what is an eligible cost regarding RDM is urgently needed for researchers
and also for the RDM support teams at the universities For example
bull If a project needs to buy extra storage from the own institution is that cost eligible
Or only external storage systems are eligible
bull Database curatorsadmins could be financed by EC projects
bull Are licenses for Electronic lab Notebooks (ELNs) for experimental data documentation
eligible costs
bull Are there differences in RDM eligible costs between consortium projects and IF or
ERC for example If there are differences it would be best if the EC provide examples
for all the type of calls
7 Explain DMP review practices
bull Endorse the internal assessment framework to ensure consistent use
bull Continue to provide internal training on reviewing DMPs in collaboration with
FOSTER Plus and other relevant groups
bull Develop circulate review guidelines and FAQs on practical implementation
bull Make a public statement on how DMPs are being reviewed ideally releasing the
assessment framework at the same time
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 26
Activities that may help
bull Science Europe Domain Data Protocols (DDPs)
bull Collections of example DMPs eg DCC RIOjournal Zenodo OpenAIRE
bull Existing costs guides eg LCRDM resource amp Wellcome guidance
bull Integrating registries into tools like DMPonline
bull RDA Working Group on Common standards for DMPs
bull Further support from FAIR Data EG OpenAIRE and others
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 27
What can you do
bull Share your DMP
ndash Publish in RIO - httpsriojournalcom
ndash Deposit in Zenodo - httpszenodoorg
ndash Add to DCC list - wwwdccacukshare-DMPs
bull Continue to provide feedback on the pilot and what works for you (or not)
bull Collaboration across research and support communities to develop your approach
bull Work with wider initiatives eg NOADs and international groups like RDA
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 28
Conclusions
Although there are several recommendations to the EC feedback was positive
bull Many found the process of developing a DMP a positive experience
bull Over half agree that the template was very useful
bull 19 of 68 stated they encountered no issues in following the EC guidelines
The EC has already iterated its open data guidelines and actively seeks input to
inform future policy developments
Further updates are likely The FAIR Data EG is to advise on future revisions of the
DMP template including the development of additional discipline specific guidance
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 29
Where to find out more
All the survey materials are on Zenodo
DOI 105281zenodo1120245
httpszenodoorgrecord1120245
bull Survey report
bull Raw data
bull Analysed dataset
bull Infographic
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 30
Acknowledgments
Marjan Grootveld DANS
Emilie Hermans UGent
Eliane Fankhauser DANS
Overall positive response to DMPs [Q3]
Both positive and negative it helped us reflect on potential issues and decide
how to address these as a project and also it was frustrating and felt like an
administrative exercise that was very long and cumbersome too specific in
some areas and too vague unclear in others
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 4
ldquoInitially it looks as an administrative exercise
but I find it very useful since although I have an
idea of what data I will collect in my project this
makes me reflect on the best format to present
them where to make them available etcrdquo
Good understanding of FAIR buthellip
ldquoWe understand the basic principle of FAIR but the terminology is often difficult
to grasp immediately Things could be explained better in plain languagerdquo
ldquoThe term interoperable is quite confusing sometimes and mixed with re-userdquo
ldquoI could do with help understanding the section on Making data interoperable
as I dont understand a number of the terms and conceptsrdquo
Table from Q4 comments from Q5
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 5
To what extent do the following statements represent your experience of using the H2020 template
Agree Neither agree nor disagree Disagree
I donrsquot understand what FAIR means 10 17 16 28 74 125
Language is a barrier [Q5]
Respondents mentioned
40 terms which were
unclear to them
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 6
ldquoResearchers are not familiar with the following termsphrases Metadata standards for
metadatadata ontologies mapping with ontologies interoperability All the ICT jargonrdquo
ldquoWith the help from Swedish National Data Service we could clarify many questions Without
this help we would not be able to finish the DMPrdquo
Template structure is problematic [Q6 amp 19]
ldquoThere is too much overlap between F A I and R
We have stopped talking about FAIR and removed
it from our replacement H2020 DMP templaterdquo
ldquoQuestions about the Metadata appear under 21
22 and 23rdquo
ldquoHaving to explain how to make data findable
before talking of the repositories chosen to make
data open is difficult and forces you to anticipate
things to be detailed laterrdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 7
bull Repetition
bull Ordering not logical
bull Too many precise questions
bull Need more dropdown options
and examples
User priorities for support [Q11]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 8
Our recommendations
1 Clarify EC requirements for DMPs
2 Revise the DMP template structure
3 Simplify the DMP content and terminology
4 Provide discipline-specific guidelines and example answers
5 Encourage the publishing of DMPs and collate examples
6 Facilitate the inclusion of RDM costs in grant applications
7 Improve DMP review practices and share guidelines
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 9
Experience with DMP template [Q4]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 10
Guidance that could be improved [Q7]
bull More subject- or field-
specific
bull Less complicated
technical or less vague
generic
bull Inclusion of examples
bull DMPs
bull Repositories
bull Interoperability
bull Cost estimation
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 11
Missing topics [Q8]
bull Discipline-specific approach
bull Access
bull Data quality assurance
bull Metadata and documentation
bull Software
bull Reproducibility
bull Costs
bull Storage
bull Legal issues
bull The format of the template
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 12
ldquoI think this would probably
vary according to individual
projects It is possible that a
one-size-fits-all approach is
not practicalrdquo
Issues encountered [Q9]
ldquoProcesses around the assessment of the
content are unclear to merdquo
ldquoAs stated before clarification of what is
an eligible cost regarding RDM is urgently
needed for researchers and also for the
RDM support teams at the universitiesrdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 13
Suggestions [Q10]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 14
ldquoWhich parts should be set up
already in the beginning and what
can be added later Would be
helpful to indicate needed and
nice to have for the starting point
or for different stagesrdquo
DMP publishing [Q12]
bull Half of free text answers rdquoYes ifhelliprdquo
bull Depending on confidentiality of the
information in the DMP
bull First reach a level of confidence in
publishing DMPs
bull The project has finished
bull No because it might bring project
partners in danger
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 15
Suggestions to EC [Q14]
ldquoTalk to researchers and ask them
whether the DMP requirements
are realistic Involve researchers
when developing disciplinary
guidancerdquo
ldquoFocus on technical exchange
format for these plans so they can
be shared between tools (ie
make the plans themselves FAIR)rdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 16
Providing feedback [Q15-16]
ldquoIn some cases I had to look together with researchers into their publications or WPs
description of a project in order to help them identify the type of data they are collecting in
order to include them in the DMP This exercise also helped them to identify which data might
have a re-use potential and which ones were submitted to special policies regulationsrdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 17
Time to review H2020 DMPs [Q18]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 18
27 said the H2020 process took much longer and was more complicated
based on 45 responses
19
Recommendationshellip
Image CC-BY-NC by Thomas Hawk
httpswwwflickrcomphotosthomashawk15634502093
1 Clarify EC requirements for DMPs
bull Collate all data-related and DMP guidelines in a single document
bull Provide public announcements and alerts to key groups when guidelines change
bull Be more explicit about when a DMP is and isnrsquot required
bull Clarify exactly what set of questions should be answered in DMPs
bull Provide a docx or rtf template to use as well as supporting online tools
httpeceuropaeuresearchparticipantsdatarefh2020grants_manualhioa_pilot
h2020-hi-oa-data-mgt_enpdf
2 Revise the DMP template structure
bull Regroup questions according to key activities and order in a more logical fashion
bull Identify which questions should be answered when
bull Where possible indicate secondary questions that can be skipped if not relevant
bull Include more yesno questions dropdown options or API integrations
bull Identify questions that will support evaluation and formulate them in a structured
way to enable automated compliance checks in future
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 21
3 Simplify DMP content amp terminology
bull Simplify the terminology used where possible
bull Provide a glossary of terms to assist researchers
bull Offer example answers particularly for questions with more technical terms
bull Seek to shorten the number of questions being asked
bull Provide some hierarchy or routing to the structuring of the questions
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 22
4 Discipline guidelines amp example answers
bull Provide discipline-specific guidelines
bull Offer example answers based on good practice in each domain
bull Give dropdown options or ranges pertinent to each field
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 23
We suggest that the EC builds on existing work and
collaborates with domain data centres and discipline-
specific groups such as learned societies
5 Publish DMPs and collate examples
bull Encourage projects to publish their DMPs
bull Offer a DMP registry service
bull Provide a library of lsquoapprovedrsquo DMPs representing
the range of funded research
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 24
Build on projectsrsquo existing willingness to publish and
work with external reviewers e-Infrastructure projects
and other groups eg LIBER to help approve examples
6 Include RDM costs in grant applications
bull Raise a few RDM questions alerts at the grant proposal stage
bull Provide worked examples that demonstrate what to include as RDM costs and how
bull Brief reviewers on eligible and expected costs
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 25
Clarification of what is an eligible cost regarding RDM is urgently needed for researchers
and also for the RDM support teams at the universities For example
bull If a project needs to buy extra storage from the own institution is that cost eligible
Or only external storage systems are eligible
bull Database curatorsadmins could be financed by EC projects
bull Are licenses for Electronic lab Notebooks (ELNs) for experimental data documentation
eligible costs
bull Are there differences in RDM eligible costs between consortium projects and IF or
ERC for example If there are differences it would be best if the EC provide examples
for all the type of calls
7 Explain DMP review practices
bull Endorse the internal assessment framework to ensure consistent use
bull Continue to provide internal training on reviewing DMPs in collaboration with
FOSTER Plus and other relevant groups
bull Develop circulate review guidelines and FAQs on practical implementation
bull Make a public statement on how DMPs are being reviewed ideally releasing the
assessment framework at the same time
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 26
Activities that may help
bull Science Europe Domain Data Protocols (DDPs)
bull Collections of example DMPs eg DCC RIOjournal Zenodo OpenAIRE
bull Existing costs guides eg LCRDM resource amp Wellcome guidance
bull Integrating registries into tools like DMPonline
bull RDA Working Group on Common standards for DMPs
bull Further support from FAIR Data EG OpenAIRE and others
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 27
What can you do
bull Share your DMP
ndash Publish in RIO - httpsriojournalcom
ndash Deposit in Zenodo - httpszenodoorg
ndash Add to DCC list - wwwdccacukshare-DMPs
bull Continue to provide feedback on the pilot and what works for you (or not)
bull Collaboration across research and support communities to develop your approach
bull Work with wider initiatives eg NOADs and international groups like RDA
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 28
Conclusions
Although there are several recommendations to the EC feedback was positive
bull Many found the process of developing a DMP a positive experience
bull Over half agree that the template was very useful
bull 19 of 68 stated they encountered no issues in following the EC guidelines
The EC has already iterated its open data guidelines and actively seeks input to
inform future policy developments
Further updates are likely The FAIR Data EG is to advise on future revisions of the
DMP template including the development of additional discipline specific guidance
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 29
Where to find out more
All the survey materials are on Zenodo
DOI 105281zenodo1120245
httpszenodoorgrecord1120245
bull Survey report
bull Raw data
bull Analysed dataset
bull Infographic
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 30
Acknowledgments
Marjan Grootveld DANS
Emilie Hermans UGent
Eliane Fankhauser DANS
Good understanding of FAIR buthellip
ldquoWe understand the basic principle of FAIR but the terminology is often difficult
to grasp immediately Things could be explained better in plain languagerdquo
ldquoThe term interoperable is quite confusing sometimes and mixed with re-userdquo
ldquoI could do with help understanding the section on Making data interoperable
as I dont understand a number of the terms and conceptsrdquo
Table from Q4 comments from Q5
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 5
To what extent do the following statements represent your experience of using the H2020 template
Agree Neither agree nor disagree Disagree
I donrsquot understand what FAIR means 10 17 16 28 74 125
Language is a barrier [Q5]
Respondents mentioned
40 terms which were
unclear to them
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 6
ldquoResearchers are not familiar with the following termsphrases Metadata standards for
metadatadata ontologies mapping with ontologies interoperability All the ICT jargonrdquo
ldquoWith the help from Swedish National Data Service we could clarify many questions Without
this help we would not be able to finish the DMPrdquo
Template structure is problematic [Q6 amp 19]
ldquoThere is too much overlap between F A I and R
We have stopped talking about FAIR and removed
it from our replacement H2020 DMP templaterdquo
ldquoQuestions about the Metadata appear under 21
22 and 23rdquo
ldquoHaving to explain how to make data findable
before talking of the repositories chosen to make
data open is difficult and forces you to anticipate
things to be detailed laterrdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 7
bull Repetition
bull Ordering not logical
bull Too many precise questions
bull Need more dropdown options
and examples
User priorities for support [Q11]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 8
Our recommendations
1 Clarify EC requirements for DMPs
2 Revise the DMP template structure
3 Simplify the DMP content and terminology
4 Provide discipline-specific guidelines and example answers
5 Encourage the publishing of DMPs and collate examples
6 Facilitate the inclusion of RDM costs in grant applications
7 Improve DMP review practices and share guidelines
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 9
Experience with DMP template [Q4]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 10
Guidance that could be improved [Q7]
bull More subject- or field-
specific
bull Less complicated
technical or less vague
generic
bull Inclusion of examples
bull DMPs
bull Repositories
bull Interoperability
bull Cost estimation
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 11
Missing topics [Q8]
bull Discipline-specific approach
bull Access
bull Data quality assurance
bull Metadata and documentation
bull Software
bull Reproducibility
bull Costs
bull Storage
bull Legal issues
bull The format of the template
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 12
ldquoI think this would probably
vary according to individual
projects It is possible that a
one-size-fits-all approach is
not practicalrdquo
Issues encountered [Q9]
ldquoProcesses around the assessment of the
content are unclear to merdquo
ldquoAs stated before clarification of what is
an eligible cost regarding RDM is urgently
needed for researchers and also for the
RDM support teams at the universitiesrdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 13
Suggestions [Q10]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 14
ldquoWhich parts should be set up
already in the beginning and what
can be added later Would be
helpful to indicate needed and
nice to have for the starting point
or for different stagesrdquo
DMP publishing [Q12]
bull Half of free text answers rdquoYes ifhelliprdquo
bull Depending on confidentiality of the
information in the DMP
bull First reach a level of confidence in
publishing DMPs
bull The project has finished
bull No because it might bring project
partners in danger
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 15
Suggestions to EC [Q14]
ldquoTalk to researchers and ask them
whether the DMP requirements
are realistic Involve researchers
when developing disciplinary
guidancerdquo
ldquoFocus on technical exchange
format for these plans so they can
be shared between tools (ie
make the plans themselves FAIR)rdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 16
Providing feedback [Q15-16]
ldquoIn some cases I had to look together with researchers into their publications or WPs
description of a project in order to help them identify the type of data they are collecting in
order to include them in the DMP This exercise also helped them to identify which data might
have a re-use potential and which ones were submitted to special policies regulationsrdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 17
Time to review H2020 DMPs [Q18]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 18
27 said the H2020 process took much longer and was more complicated
based on 45 responses
19
Recommendationshellip
Image CC-BY-NC by Thomas Hawk
httpswwwflickrcomphotosthomashawk15634502093
1 Clarify EC requirements for DMPs
bull Collate all data-related and DMP guidelines in a single document
bull Provide public announcements and alerts to key groups when guidelines change
bull Be more explicit about when a DMP is and isnrsquot required
bull Clarify exactly what set of questions should be answered in DMPs
bull Provide a docx or rtf template to use as well as supporting online tools
httpeceuropaeuresearchparticipantsdatarefh2020grants_manualhioa_pilot
h2020-hi-oa-data-mgt_enpdf
2 Revise the DMP template structure
bull Regroup questions according to key activities and order in a more logical fashion
bull Identify which questions should be answered when
bull Where possible indicate secondary questions that can be skipped if not relevant
bull Include more yesno questions dropdown options or API integrations
bull Identify questions that will support evaluation and formulate them in a structured
way to enable automated compliance checks in future
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 21
3 Simplify DMP content amp terminology
bull Simplify the terminology used where possible
bull Provide a glossary of terms to assist researchers
bull Offer example answers particularly for questions with more technical terms
bull Seek to shorten the number of questions being asked
bull Provide some hierarchy or routing to the structuring of the questions
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 22
4 Discipline guidelines amp example answers
bull Provide discipline-specific guidelines
bull Offer example answers based on good practice in each domain
bull Give dropdown options or ranges pertinent to each field
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 23
We suggest that the EC builds on existing work and
collaborates with domain data centres and discipline-
specific groups such as learned societies
5 Publish DMPs and collate examples
bull Encourage projects to publish their DMPs
bull Offer a DMP registry service
bull Provide a library of lsquoapprovedrsquo DMPs representing
the range of funded research
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 24
Build on projectsrsquo existing willingness to publish and
work with external reviewers e-Infrastructure projects
and other groups eg LIBER to help approve examples
6 Include RDM costs in grant applications
bull Raise a few RDM questions alerts at the grant proposal stage
bull Provide worked examples that demonstrate what to include as RDM costs and how
bull Brief reviewers on eligible and expected costs
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 25
Clarification of what is an eligible cost regarding RDM is urgently needed for researchers
and also for the RDM support teams at the universities For example
bull If a project needs to buy extra storage from the own institution is that cost eligible
Or only external storage systems are eligible
bull Database curatorsadmins could be financed by EC projects
bull Are licenses for Electronic lab Notebooks (ELNs) for experimental data documentation
eligible costs
bull Are there differences in RDM eligible costs between consortium projects and IF or
ERC for example If there are differences it would be best if the EC provide examples
for all the type of calls
7 Explain DMP review practices
bull Endorse the internal assessment framework to ensure consistent use
bull Continue to provide internal training on reviewing DMPs in collaboration with
FOSTER Plus and other relevant groups
bull Develop circulate review guidelines and FAQs on practical implementation
bull Make a public statement on how DMPs are being reviewed ideally releasing the
assessment framework at the same time
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 26
Activities that may help
bull Science Europe Domain Data Protocols (DDPs)
bull Collections of example DMPs eg DCC RIOjournal Zenodo OpenAIRE
bull Existing costs guides eg LCRDM resource amp Wellcome guidance
bull Integrating registries into tools like DMPonline
bull RDA Working Group on Common standards for DMPs
bull Further support from FAIR Data EG OpenAIRE and others
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 27
What can you do
bull Share your DMP
ndash Publish in RIO - httpsriojournalcom
ndash Deposit in Zenodo - httpszenodoorg
ndash Add to DCC list - wwwdccacukshare-DMPs
bull Continue to provide feedback on the pilot and what works for you (or not)
bull Collaboration across research and support communities to develop your approach
bull Work with wider initiatives eg NOADs and international groups like RDA
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 28
Conclusions
Although there are several recommendations to the EC feedback was positive
bull Many found the process of developing a DMP a positive experience
bull Over half agree that the template was very useful
bull 19 of 68 stated they encountered no issues in following the EC guidelines
The EC has already iterated its open data guidelines and actively seeks input to
inform future policy developments
Further updates are likely The FAIR Data EG is to advise on future revisions of the
DMP template including the development of additional discipline specific guidance
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 29
Where to find out more
All the survey materials are on Zenodo
DOI 105281zenodo1120245
httpszenodoorgrecord1120245
bull Survey report
bull Raw data
bull Analysed dataset
bull Infographic
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 30
Acknowledgments
Marjan Grootveld DANS
Emilie Hermans UGent
Eliane Fankhauser DANS
Language is a barrier [Q5]
Respondents mentioned
40 terms which were
unclear to them
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 6
ldquoResearchers are not familiar with the following termsphrases Metadata standards for
metadatadata ontologies mapping with ontologies interoperability All the ICT jargonrdquo
ldquoWith the help from Swedish National Data Service we could clarify many questions Without
this help we would not be able to finish the DMPrdquo
Template structure is problematic [Q6 amp 19]
ldquoThere is too much overlap between F A I and R
We have stopped talking about FAIR and removed
it from our replacement H2020 DMP templaterdquo
ldquoQuestions about the Metadata appear under 21
22 and 23rdquo
ldquoHaving to explain how to make data findable
before talking of the repositories chosen to make
data open is difficult and forces you to anticipate
things to be detailed laterrdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 7
bull Repetition
bull Ordering not logical
bull Too many precise questions
bull Need more dropdown options
and examples
User priorities for support [Q11]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 8
Our recommendations
1 Clarify EC requirements for DMPs
2 Revise the DMP template structure
3 Simplify the DMP content and terminology
4 Provide discipline-specific guidelines and example answers
5 Encourage the publishing of DMPs and collate examples
6 Facilitate the inclusion of RDM costs in grant applications
7 Improve DMP review practices and share guidelines
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 9
Experience with DMP template [Q4]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 10
Guidance that could be improved [Q7]
bull More subject- or field-
specific
bull Less complicated
technical or less vague
generic
bull Inclusion of examples
bull DMPs
bull Repositories
bull Interoperability
bull Cost estimation
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 11
Missing topics [Q8]
bull Discipline-specific approach
bull Access
bull Data quality assurance
bull Metadata and documentation
bull Software
bull Reproducibility
bull Costs
bull Storage
bull Legal issues
bull The format of the template
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 12
ldquoI think this would probably
vary according to individual
projects It is possible that a
one-size-fits-all approach is
not practicalrdquo
Issues encountered [Q9]
ldquoProcesses around the assessment of the
content are unclear to merdquo
ldquoAs stated before clarification of what is
an eligible cost regarding RDM is urgently
needed for researchers and also for the
RDM support teams at the universitiesrdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 13
Suggestions [Q10]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 14
ldquoWhich parts should be set up
already in the beginning and what
can be added later Would be
helpful to indicate needed and
nice to have for the starting point
or for different stagesrdquo
DMP publishing [Q12]
bull Half of free text answers rdquoYes ifhelliprdquo
bull Depending on confidentiality of the
information in the DMP
bull First reach a level of confidence in
publishing DMPs
bull The project has finished
bull No because it might bring project
partners in danger
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 15
Suggestions to EC [Q14]
ldquoTalk to researchers and ask them
whether the DMP requirements
are realistic Involve researchers
when developing disciplinary
guidancerdquo
ldquoFocus on technical exchange
format for these plans so they can
be shared between tools (ie
make the plans themselves FAIR)rdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 16
Providing feedback [Q15-16]
ldquoIn some cases I had to look together with researchers into their publications or WPs
description of a project in order to help them identify the type of data they are collecting in
order to include them in the DMP This exercise also helped them to identify which data might
have a re-use potential and which ones were submitted to special policies regulationsrdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 17
Time to review H2020 DMPs [Q18]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 18
27 said the H2020 process took much longer and was more complicated
based on 45 responses
19
Recommendationshellip
Image CC-BY-NC by Thomas Hawk
httpswwwflickrcomphotosthomashawk15634502093
1 Clarify EC requirements for DMPs
bull Collate all data-related and DMP guidelines in a single document
bull Provide public announcements and alerts to key groups when guidelines change
bull Be more explicit about when a DMP is and isnrsquot required
bull Clarify exactly what set of questions should be answered in DMPs
bull Provide a docx or rtf template to use as well as supporting online tools
httpeceuropaeuresearchparticipantsdatarefh2020grants_manualhioa_pilot
h2020-hi-oa-data-mgt_enpdf
2 Revise the DMP template structure
bull Regroup questions according to key activities and order in a more logical fashion
bull Identify which questions should be answered when
bull Where possible indicate secondary questions that can be skipped if not relevant
bull Include more yesno questions dropdown options or API integrations
bull Identify questions that will support evaluation and formulate them in a structured
way to enable automated compliance checks in future
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 21
3 Simplify DMP content amp terminology
bull Simplify the terminology used where possible
bull Provide a glossary of terms to assist researchers
bull Offer example answers particularly for questions with more technical terms
bull Seek to shorten the number of questions being asked
bull Provide some hierarchy or routing to the structuring of the questions
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 22
4 Discipline guidelines amp example answers
bull Provide discipline-specific guidelines
bull Offer example answers based on good practice in each domain
bull Give dropdown options or ranges pertinent to each field
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 23
We suggest that the EC builds on existing work and
collaborates with domain data centres and discipline-
specific groups such as learned societies
5 Publish DMPs and collate examples
bull Encourage projects to publish their DMPs
bull Offer a DMP registry service
bull Provide a library of lsquoapprovedrsquo DMPs representing
the range of funded research
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 24
Build on projectsrsquo existing willingness to publish and
work with external reviewers e-Infrastructure projects
and other groups eg LIBER to help approve examples
6 Include RDM costs in grant applications
bull Raise a few RDM questions alerts at the grant proposal stage
bull Provide worked examples that demonstrate what to include as RDM costs and how
bull Brief reviewers on eligible and expected costs
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 25
Clarification of what is an eligible cost regarding RDM is urgently needed for researchers
and also for the RDM support teams at the universities For example
bull If a project needs to buy extra storage from the own institution is that cost eligible
Or only external storage systems are eligible
bull Database curatorsadmins could be financed by EC projects
bull Are licenses for Electronic lab Notebooks (ELNs) for experimental data documentation
eligible costs
bull Are there differences in RDM eligible costs between consortium projects and IF or
ERC for example If there are differences it would be best if the EC provide examples
for all the type of calls
7 Explain DMP review practices
bull Endorse the internal assessment framework to ensure consistent use
bull Continue to provide internal training on reviewing DMPs in collaboration with
FOSTER Plus and other relevant groups
bull Develop circulate review guidelines and FAQs on practical implementation
bull Make a public statement on how DMPs are being reviewed ideally releasing the
assessment framework at the same time
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 26
Activities that may help
bull Science Europe Domain Data Protocols (DDPs)
bull Collections of example DMPs eg DCC RIOjournal Zenodo OpenAIRE
bull Existing costs guides eg LCRDM resource amp Wellcome guidance
bull Integrating registries into tools like DMPonline
bull RDA Working Group on Common standards for DMPs
bull Further support from FAIR Data EG OpenAIRE and others
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 27
What can you do
bull Share your DMP
ndash Publish in RIO - httpsriojournalcom
ndash Deposit in Zenodo - httpszenodoorg
ndash Add to DCC list - wwwdccacukshare-DMPs
bull Continue to provide feedback on the pilot and what works for you (or not)
bull Collaboration across research and support communities to develop your approach
bull Work with wider initiatives eg NOADs and international groups like RDA
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 28
Conclusions
Although there are several recommendations to the EC feedback was positive
bull Many found the process of developing a DMP a positive experience
bull Over half agree that the template was very useful
bull 19 of 68 stated they encountered no issues in following the EC guidelines
The EC has already iterated its open data guidelines and actively seeks input to
inform future policy developments
Further updates are likely The FAIR Data EG is to advise on future revisions of the
DMP template including the development of additional discipline specific guidance
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 29
Where to find out more
All the survey materials are on Zenodo
DOI 105281zenodo1120245
httpszenodoorgrecord1120245
bull Survey report
bull Raw data
bull Analysed dataset
bull Infographic
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 30
Acknowledgments
Marjan Grootveld DANS
Emilie Hermans UGent
Eliane Fankhauser DANS
Template structure is problematic [Q6 amp 19]
ldquoThere is too much overlap between F A I and R
We have stopped talking about FAIR and removed
it from our replacement H2020 DMP templaterdquo
ldquoQuestions about the Metadata appear under 21
22 and 23rdquo
ldquoHaving to explain how to make data findable
before talking of the repositories chosen to make
data open is difficult and forces you to anticipate
things to be detailed laterrdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 7
bull Repetition
bull Ordering not logical
bull Too many precise questions
bull Need more dropdown options
and examples
User priorities for support [Q11]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 8
Our recommendations
1 Clarify EC requirements for DMPs
2 Revise the DMP template structure
3 Simplify the DMP content and terminology
4 Provide discipline-specific guidelines and example answers
5 Encourage the publishing of DMPs and collate examples
6 Facilitate the inclusion of RDM costs in grant applications
7 Improve DMP review practices and share guidelines
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 9
Experience with DMP template [Q4]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 10
Guidance that could be improved [Q7]
bull More subject- or field-
specific
bull Less complicated
technical or less vague
generic
bull Inclusion of examples
bull DMPs
bull Repositories
bull Interoperability
bull Cost estimation
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 11
Missing topics [Q8]
bull Discipline-specific approach
bull Access
bull Data quality assurance
bull Metadata and documentation
bull Software
bull Reproducibility
bull Costs
bull Storage
bull Legal issues
bull The format of the template
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 12
ldquoI think this would probably
vary according to individual
projects It is possible that a
one-size-fits-all approach is
not practicalrdquo
Issues encountered [Q9]
ldquoProcesses around the assessment of the
content are unclear to merdquo
ldquoAs stated before clarification of what is
an eligible cost regarding RDM is urgently
needed for researchers and also for the
RDM support teams at the universitiesrdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 13
Suggestions [Q10]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 14
ldquoWhich parts should be set up
already in the beginning and what
can be added later Would be
helpful to indicate needed and
nice to have for the starting point
or for different stagesrdquo
DMP publishing [Q12]
bull Half of free text answers rdquoYes ifhelliprdquo
bull Depending on confidentiality of the
information in the DMP
bull First reach a level of confidence in
publishing DMPs
bull The project has finished
bull No because it might bring project
partners in danger
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 15
Suggestions to EC [Q14]
ldquoTalk to researchers and ask them
whether the DMP requirements
are realistic Involve researchers
when developing disciplinary
guidancerdquo
ldquoFocus on technical exchange
format for these plans so they can
be shared between tools (ie
make the plans themselves FAIR)rdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 16
Providing feedback [Q15-16]
ldquoIn some cases I had to look together with researchers into their publications or WPs
description of a project in order to help them identify the type of data they are collecting in
order to include them in the DMP This exercise also helped them to identify which data might
have a re-use potential and which ones were submitted to special policies regulationsrdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 17
Time to review H2020 DMPs [Q18]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 18
27 said the H2020 process took much longer and was more complicated
based on 45 responses
19
Recommendationshellip
Image CC-BY-NC by Thomas Hawk
httpswwwflickrcomphotosthomashawk15634502093
1 Clarify EC requirements for DMPs
bull Collate all data-related and DMP guidelines in a single document
bull Provide public announcements and alerts to key groups when guidelines change
bull Be more explicit about when a DMP is and isnrsquot required
bull Clarify exactly what set of questions should be answered in DMPs
bull Provide a docx or rtf template to use as well as supporting online tools
httpeceuropaeuresearchparticipantsdatarefh2020grants_manualhioa_pilot
h2020-hi-oa-data-mgt_enpdf
2 Revise the DMP template structure
bull Regroup questions according to key activities and order in a more logical fashion
bull Identify which questions should be answered when
bull Where possible indicate secondary questions that can be skipped if not relevant
bull Include more yesno questions dropdown options or API integrations
bull Identify questions that will support evaluation and formulate them in a structured
way to enable automated compliance checks in future
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 21
3 Simplify DMP content amp terminology
bull Simplify the terminology used where possible
bull Provide a glossary of terms to assist researchers
bull Offer example answers particularly for questions with more technical terms
bull Seek to shorten the number of questions being asked
bull Provide some hierarchy or routing to the structuring of the questions
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 22
4 Discipline guidelines amp example answers
bull Provide discipline-specific guidelines
bull Offer example answers based on good practice in each domain
bull Give dropdown options or ranges pertinent to each field
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 23
We suggest that the EC builds on existing work and
collaborates with domain data centres and discipline-
specific groups such as learned societies
5 Publish DMPs and collate examples
bull Encourage projects to publish their DMPs
bull Offer a DMP registry service
bull Provide a library of lsquoapprovedrsquo DMPs representing
the range of funded research
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 24
Build on projectsrsquo existing willingness to publish and
work with external reviewers e-Infrastructure projects
and other groups eg LIBER to help approve examples
6 Include RDM costs in grant applications
bull Raise a few RDM questions alerts at the grant proposal stage
bull Provide worked examples that demonstrate what to include as RDM costs and how
bull Brief reviewers on eligible and expected costs
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 25
Clarification of what is an eligible cost regarding RDM is urgently needed for researchers
and also for the RDM support teams at the universities For example
bull If a project needs to buy extra storage from the own institution is that cost eligible
Or only external storage systems are eligible
bull Database curatorsadmins could be financed by EC projects
bull Are licenses for Electronic lab Notebooks (ELNs) for experimental data documentation
eligible costs
bull Are there differences in RDM eligible costs between consortium projects and IF or
ERC for example If there are differences it would be best if the EC provide examples
for all the type of calls
7 Explain DMP review practices
bull Endorse the internal assessment framework to ensure consistent use
bull Continue to provide internal training on reviewing DMPs in collaboration with
FOSTER Plus and other relevant groups
bull Develop circulate review guidelines and FAQs on practical implementation
bull Make a public statement on how DMPs are being reviewed ideally releasing the
assessment framework at the same time
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 26
Activities that may help
bull Science Europe Domain Data Protocols (DDPs)
bull Collections of example DMPs eg DCC RIOjournal Zenodo OpenAIRE
bull Existing costs guides eg LCRDM resource amp Wellcome guidance
bull Integrating registries into tools like DMPonline
bull RDA Working Group on Common standards for DMPs
bull Further support from FAIR Data EG OpenAIRE and others
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 27
What can you do
bull Share your DMP
ndash Publish in RIO - httpsriojournalcom
ndash Deposit in Zenodo - httpszenodoorg
ndash Add to DCC list - wwwdccacukshare-DMPs
bull Continue to provide feedback on the pilot and what works for you (or not)
bull Collaboration across research and support communities to develop your approach
bull Work with wider initiatives eg NOADs and international groups like RDA
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 28
Conclusions
Although there are several recommendations to the EC feedback was positive
bull Many found the process of developing a DMP a positive experience
bull Over half agree that the template was very useful
bull 19 of 68 stated they encountered no issues in following the EC guidelines
The EC has already iterated its open data guidelines and actively seeks input to
inform future policy developments
Further updates are likely The FAIR Data EG is to advise on future revisions of the
DMP template including the development of additional discipline specific guidance
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 29
Where to find out more
All the survey materials are on Zenodo
DOI 105281zenodo1120245
httpszenodoorgrecord1120245
bull Survey report
bull Raw data
bull Analysed dataset
bull Infographic
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 30
Acknowledgments
Marjan Grootveld DANS
Emilie Hermans UGent
Eliane Fankhauser DANS
User priorities for support [Q11]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 8
Our recommendations
1 Clarify EC requirements for DMPs
2 Revise the DMP template structure
3 Simplify the DMP content and terminology
4 Provide discipline-specific guidelines and example answers
5 Encourage the publishing of DMPs and collate examples
6 Facilitate the inclusion of RDM costs in grant applications
7 Improve DMP review practices and share guidelines
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 9
Experience with DMP template [Q4]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 10
Guidance that could be improved [Q7]
bull More subject- or field-
specific
bull Less complicated
technical or less vague
generic
bull Inclusion of examples
bull DMPs
bull Repositories
bull Interoperability
bull Cost estimation
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 11
Missing topics [Q8]
bull Discipline-specific approach
bull Access
bull Data quality assurance
bull Metadata and documentation
bull Software
bull Reproducibility
bull Costs
bull Storage
bull Legal issues
bull The format of the template
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 12
ldquoI think this would probably
vary according to individual
projects It is possible that a
one-size-fits-all approach is
not practicalrdquo
Issues encountered [Q9]
ldquoProcesses around the assessment of the
content are unclear to merdquo
ldquoAs stated before clarification of what is
an eligible cost regarding RDM is urgently
needed for researchers and also for the
RDM support teams at the universitiesrdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 13
Suggestions [Q10]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 14
ldquoWhich parts should be set up
already in the beginning and what
can be added later Would be
helpful to indicate needed and
nice to have for the starting point
or for different stagesrdquo
DMP publishing [Q12]
bull Half of free text answers rdquoYes ifhelliprdquo
bull Depending on confidentiality of the
information in the DMP
bull First reach a level of confidence in
publishing DMPs
bull The project has finished
bull No because it might bring project
partners in danger
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 15
Suggestions to EC [Q14]
ldquoTalk to researchers and ask them
whether the DMP requirements
are realistic Involve researchers
when developing disciplinary
guidancerdquo
ldquoFocus on technical exchange
format for these plans so they can
be shared between tools (ie
make the plans themselves FAIR)rdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 16
Providing feedback [Q15-16]
ldquoIn some cases I had to look together with researchers into their publications or WPs
description of a project in order to help them identify the type of data they are collecting in
order to include them in the DMP This exercise also helped them to identify which data might
have a re-use potential and which ones were submitted to special policies regulationsrdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 17
Time to review H2020 DMPs [Q18]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 18
27 said the H2020 process took much longer and was more complicated
based on 45 responses
19
Recommendationshellip
Image CC-BY-NC by Thomas Hawk
httpswwwflickrcomphotosthomashawk15634502093
1 Clarify EC requirements for DMPs
bull Collate all data-related and DMP guidelines in a single document
bull Provide public announcements and alerts to key groups when guidelines change
bull Be more explicit about when a DMP is and isnrsquot required
bull Clarify exactly what set of questions should be answered in DMPs
bull Provide a docx or rtf template to use as well as supporting online tools
httpeceuropaeuresearchparticipantsdatarefh2020grants_manualhioa_pilot
h2020-hi-oa-data-mgt_enpdf
2 Revise the DMP template structure
bull Regroup questions according to key activities and order in a more logical fashion
bull Identify which questions should be answered when
bull Where possible indicate secondary questions that can be skipped if not relevant
bull Include more yesno questions dropdown options or API integrations
bull Identify questions that will support evaluation and formulate them in a structured
way to enable automated compliance checks in future
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 21
3 Simplify DMP content amp terminology
bull Simplify the terminology used where possible
bull Provide a glossary of terms to assist researchers
bull Offer example answers particularly for questions with more technical terms
bull Seek to shorten the number of questions being asked
bull Provide some hierarchy or routing to the structuring of the questions
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 22
4 Discipline guidelines amp example answers
bull Provide discipline-specific guidelines
bull Offer example answers based on good practice in each domain
bull Give dropdown options or ranges pertinent to each field
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 23
We suggest that the EC builds on existing work and
collaborates with domain data centres and discipline-
specific groups such as learned societies
5 Publish DMPs and collate examples
bull Encourage projects to publish their DMPs
bull Offer a DMP registry service
bull Provide a library of lsquoapprovedrsquo DMPs representing
the range of funded research
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 24
Build on projectsrsquo existing willingness to publish and
work with external reviewers e-Infrastructure projects
and other groups eg LIBER to help approve examples
6 Include RDM costs in grant applications
bull Raise a few RDM questions alerts at the grant proposal stage
bull Provide worked examples that demonstrate what to include as RDM costs and how
bull Brief reviewers on eligible and expected costs
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 25
Clarification of what is an eligible cost regarding RDM is urgently needed for researchers
and also for the RDM support teams at the universities For example
bull If a project needs to buy extra storage from the own institution is that cost eligible
Or only external storage systems are eligible
bull Database curatorsadmins could be financed by EC projects
bull Are licenses for Electronic lab Notebooks (ELNs) for experimental data documentation
eligible costs
bull Are there differences in RDM eligible costs between consortium projects and IF or
ERC for example If there are differences it would be best if the EC provide examples
for all the type of calls
7 Explain DMP review practices
bull Endorse the internal assessment framework to ensure consistent use
bull Continue to provide internal training on reviewing DMPs in collaboration with
FOSTER Plus and other relevant groups
bull Develop circulate review guidelines and FAQs on practical implementation
bull Make a public statement on how DMPs are being reviewed ideally releasing the
assessment framework at the same time
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 26
Activities that may help
bull Science Europe Domain Data Protocols (DDPs)
bull Collections of example DMPs eg DCC RIOjournal Zenodo OpenAIRE
bull Existing costs guides eg LCRDM resource amp Wellcome guidance
bull Integrating registries into tools like DMPonline
bull RDA Working Group on Common standards for DMPs
bull Further support from FAIR Data EG OpenAIRE and others
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 27
What can you do
bull Share your DMP
ndash Publish in RIO - httpsriojournalcom
ndash Deposit in Zenodo - httpszenodoorg
ndash Add to DCC list - wwwdccacukshare-DMPs
bull Continue to provide feedback on the pilot and what works for you (or not)
bull Collaboration across research and support communities to develop your approach
bull Work with wider initiatives eg NOADs and international groups like RDA
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 28
Conclusions
Although there are several recommendations to the EC feedback was positive
bull Many found the process of developing a DMP a positive experience
bull Over half agree that the template was very useful
bull 19 of 68 stated they encountered no issues in following the EC guidelines
The EC has already iterated its open data guidelines and actively seeks input to
inform future policy developments
Further updates are likely The FAIR Data EG is to advise on future revisions of the
DMP template including the development of additional discipline specific guidance
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 29
Where to find out more
All the survey materials are on Zenodo
DOI 105281zenodo1120245
httpszenodoorgrecord1120245
bull Survey report
bull Raw data
bull Analysed dataset
bull Infographic
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 30
Acknowledgments
Marjan Grootveld DANS
Emilie Hermans UGent
Eliane Fankhauser DANS
Our recommendations
1 Clarify EC requirements for DMPs
2 Revise the DMP template structure
3 Simplify the DMP content and terminology
4 Provide discipline-specific guidelines and example answers
5 Encourage the publishing of DMPs and collate examples
6 Facilitate the inclusion of RDM costs in grant applications
7 Improve DMP review practices and share guidelines
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 9
Experience with DMP template [Q4]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 10
Guidance that could be improved [Q7]
bull More subject- or field-
specific
bull Less complicated
technical or less vague
generic
bull Inclusion of examples
bull DMPs
bull Repositories
bull Interoperability
bull Cost estimation
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 11
Missing topics [Q8]
bull Discipline-specific approach
bull Access
bull Data quality assurance
bull Metadata and documentation
bull Software
bull Reproducibility
bull Costs
bull Storage
bull Legal issues
bull The format of the template
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 12
ldquoI think this would probably
vary according to individual
projects It is possible that a
one-size-fits-all approach is
not practicalrdquo
Issues encountered [Q9]
ldquoProcesses around the assessment of the
content are unclear to merdquo
ldquoAs stated before clarification of what is
an eligible cost regarding RDM is urgently
needed for researchers and also for the
RDM support teams at the universitiesrdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 13
Suggestions [Q10]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 14
ldquoWhich parts should be set up
already in the beginning and what
can be added later Would be
helpful to indicate needed and
nice to have for the starting point
or for different stagesrdquo
DMP publishing [Q12]
bull Half of free text answers rdquoYes ifhelliprdquo
bull Depending on confidentiality of the
information in the DMP
bull First reach a level of confidence in
publishing DMPs
bull The project has finished
bull No because it might bring project
partners in danger
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 15
Suggestions to EC [Q14]
ldquoTalk to researchers and ask them
whether the DMP requirements
are realistic Involve researchers
when developing disciplinary
guidancerdquo
ldquoFocus on technical exchange
format for these plans so they can
be shared between tools (ie
make the plans themselves FAIR)rdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 16
Providing feedback [Q15-16]
ldquoIn some cases I had to look together with researchers into their publications or WPs
description of a project in order to help them identify the type of data they are collecting in
order to include them in the DMP This exercise also helped them to identify which data might
have a re-use potential and which ones were submitted to special policies regulationsrdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 17
Time to review H2020 DMPs [Q18]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 18
27 said the H2020 process took much longer and was more complicated
based on 45 responses
19
Recommendationshellip
Image CC-BY-NC by Thomas Hawk
httpswwwflickrcomphotosthomashawk15634502093
1 Clarify EC requirements for DMPs
bull Collate all data-related and DMP guidelines in a single document
bull Provide public announcements and alerts to key groups when guidelines change
bull Be more explicit about when a DMP is and isnrsquot required
bull Clarify exactly what set of questions should be answered in DMPs
bull Provide a docx or rtf template to use as well as supporting online tools
httpeceuropaeuresearchparticipantsdatarefh2020grants_manualhioa_pilot
h2020-hi-oa-data-mgt_enpdf
2 Revise the DMP template structure
bull Regroup questions according to key activities and order in a more logical fashion
bull Identify which questions should be answered when
bull Where possible indicate secondary questions that can be skipped if not relevant
bull Include more yesno questions dropdown options or API integrations
bull Identify questions that will support evaluation and formulate them in a structured
way to enable automated compliance checks in future
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 21
3 Simplify DMP content amp terminology
bull Simplify the terminology used where possible
bull Provide a glossary of terms to assist researchers
bull Offer example answers particularly for questions with more technical terms
bull Seek to shorten the number of questions being asked
bull Provide some hierarchy or routing to the structuring of the questions
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 22
4 Discipline guidelines amp example answers
bull Provide discipline-specific guidelines
bull Offer example answers based on good practice in each domain
bull Give dropdown options or ranges pertinent to each field
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 23
We suggest that the EC builds on existing work and
collaborates with domain data centres and discipline-
specific groups such as learned societies
5 Publish DMPs and collate examples
bull Encourage projects to publish their DMPs
bull Offer a DMP registry service
bull Provide a library of lsquoapprovedrsquo DMPs representing
the range of funded research
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 24
Build on projectsrsquo existing willingness to publish and
work with external reviewers e-Infrastructure projects
and other groups eg LIBER to help approve examples
6 Include RDM costs in grant applications
bull Raise a few RDM questions alerts at the grant proposal stage
bull Provide worked examples that demonstrate what to include as RDM costs and how
bull Brief reviewers on eligible and expected costs
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 25
Clarification of what is an eligible cost regarding RDM is urgently needed for researchers
and also for the RDM support teams at the universities For example
bull If a project needs to buy extra storage from the own institution is that cost eligible
Or only external storage systems are eligible
bull Database curatorsadmins could be financed by EC projects
bull Are licenses for Electronic lab Notebooks (ELNs) for experimental data documentation
eligible costs
bull Are there differences in RDM eligible costs between consortium projects and IF or
ERC for example If there are differences it would be best if the EC provide examples
for all the type of calls
7 Explain DMP review practices
bull Endorse the internal assessment framework to ensure consistent use
bull Continue to provide internal training on reviewing DMPs in collaboration with
FOSTER Plus and other relevant groups
bull Develop circulate review guidelines and FAQs on practical implementation
bull Make a public statement on how DMPs are being reviewed ideally releasing the
assessment framework at the same time
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 26
Activities that may help
bull Science Europe Domain Data Protocols (DDPs)
bull Collections of example DMPs eg DCC RIOjournal Zenodo OpenAIRE
bull Existing costs guides eg LCRDM resource amp Wellcome guidance
bull Integrating registries into tools like DMPonline
bull RDA Working Group on Common standards for DMPs
bull Further support from FAIR Data EG OpenAIRE and others
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 27
What can you do
bull Share your DMP
ndash Publish in RIO - httpsriojournalcom
ndash Deposit in Zenodo - httpszenodoorg
ndash Add to DCC list - wwwdccacukshare-DMPs
bull Continue to provide feedback on the pilot and what works for you (or not)
bull Collaboration across research and support communities to develop your approach
bull Work with wider initiatives eg NOADs and international groups like RDA
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 28
Conclusions
Although there are several recommendations to the EC feedback was positive
bull Many found the process of developing a DMP a positive experience
bull Over half agree that the template was very useful
bull 19 of 68 stated they encountered no issues in following the EC guidelines
The EC has already iterated its open data guidelines and actively seeks input to
inform future policy developments
Further updates are likely The FAIR Data EG is to advise on future revisions of the
DMP template including the development of additional discipline specific guidance
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 29
Where to find out more
All the survey materials are on Zenodo
DOI 105281zenodo1120245
httpszenodoorgrecord1120245
bull Survey report
bull Raw data
bull Analysed dataset
bull Infographic
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 30
Acknowledgments
Marjan Grootveld DANS
Emilie Hermans UGent
Eliane Fankhauser DANS
Experience with DMP template [Q4]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 10
Guidance that could be improved [Q7]
bull More subject- or field-
specific
bull Less complicated
technical or less vague
generic
bull Inclusion of examples
bull DMPs
bull Repositories
bull Interoperability
bull Cost estimation
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 11
Missing topics [Q8]
bull Discipline-specific approach
bull Access
bull Data quality assurance
bull Metadata and documentation
bull Software
bull Reproducibility
bull Costs
bull Storage
bull Legal issues
bull The format of the template
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 12
ldquoI think this would probably
vary according to individual
projects It is possible that a
one-size-fits-all approach is
not practicalrdquo
Issues encountered [Q9]
ldquoProcesses around the assessment of the
content are unclear to merdquo
ldquoAs stated before clarification of what is
an eligible cost regarding RDM is urgently
needed for researchers and also for the
RDM support teams at the universitiesrdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 13
Suggestions [Q10]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 14
ldquoWhich parts should be set up
already in the beginning and what
can be added later Would be
helpful to indicate needed and
nice to have for the starting point
or for different stagesrdquo
DMP publishing [Q12]
bull Half of free text answers rdquoYes ifhelliprdquo
bull Depending on confidentiality of the
information in the DMP
bull First reach a level of confidence in
publishing DMPs
bull The project has finished
bull No because it might bring project
partners in danger
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 15
Suggestions to EC [Q14]
ldquoTalk to researchers and ask them
whether the DMP requirements
are realistic Involve researchers
when developing disciplinary
guidancerdquo
ldquoFocus on technical exchange
format for these plans so they can
be shared between tools (ie
make the plans themselves FAIR)rdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 16
Providing feedback [Q15-16]
ldquoIn some cases I had to look together with researchers into their publications or WPs
description of a project in order to help them identify the type of data they are collecting in
order to include them in the DMP This exercise also helped them to identify which data might
have a re-use potential and which ones were submitted to special policies regulationsrdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 17
Time to review H2020 DMPs [Q18]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 18
27 said the H2020 process took much longer and was more complicated
based on 45 responses
19
Recommendationshellip
Image CC-BY-NC by Thomas Hawk
httpswwwflickrcomphotosthomashawk15634502093
1 Clarify EC requirements for DMPs
bull Collate all data-related and DMP guidelines in a single document
bull Provide public announcements and alerts to key groups when guidelines change
bull Be more explicit about when a DMP is and isnrsquot required
bull Clarify exactly what set of questions should be answered in DMPs
bull Provide a docx or rtf template to use as well as supporting online tools
httpeceuropaeuresearchparticipantsdatarefh2020grants_manualhioa_pilot
h2020-hi-oa-data-mgt_enpdf
2 Revise the DMP template structure
bull Regroup questions according to key activities and order in a more logical fashion
bull Identify which questions should be answered when
bull Where possible indicate secondary questions that can be skipped if not relevant
bull Include more yesno questions dropdown options or API integrations
bull Identify questions that will support evaluation and formulate them in a structured
way to enable automated compliance checks in future
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 21
3 Simplify DMP content amp terminology
bull Simplify the terminology used where possible
bull Provide a glossary of terms to assist researchers
bull Offer example answers particularly for questions with more technical terms
bull Seek to shorten the number of questions being asked
bull Provide some hierarchy or routing to the structuring of the questions
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 22
4 Discipline guidelines amp example answers
bull Provide discipline-specific guidelines
bull Offer example answers based on good practice in each domain
bull Give dropdown options or ranges pertinent to each field
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 23
We suggest that the EC builds on existing work and
collaborates with domain data centres and discipline-
specific groups such as learned societies
5 Publish DMPs and collate examples
bull Encourage projects to publish their DMPs
bull Offer a DMP registry service
bull Provide a library of lsquoapprovedrsquo DMPs representing
the range of funded research
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 24
Build on projectsrsquo existing willingness to publish and
work with external reviewers e-Infrastructure projects
and other groups eg LIBER to help approve examples
6 Include RDM costs in grant applications
bull Raise a few RDM questions alerts at the grant proposal stage
bull Provide worked examples that demonstrate what to include as RDM costs and how
bull Brief reviewers on eligible and expected costs
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 25
Clarification of what is an eligible cost regarding RDM is urgently needed for researchers
and also for the RDM support teams at the universities For example
bull If a project needs to buy extra storage from the own institution is that cost eligible
Or only external storage systems are eligible
bull Database curatorsadmins could be financed by EC projects
bull Are licenses for Electronic lab Notebooks (ELNs) for experimental data documentation
eligible costs
bull Are there differences in RDM eligible costs between consortium projects and IF or
ERC for example If there are differences it would be best if the EC provide examples
for all the type of calls
7 Explain DMP review practices
bull Endorse the internal assessment framework to ensure consistent use
bull Continue to provide internal training on reviewing DMPs in collaboration with
FOSTER Plus and other relevant groups
bull Develop circulate review guidelines and FAQs on practical implementation
bull Make a public statement on how DMPs are being reviewed ideally releasing the
assessment framework at the same time
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 26
Activities that may help
bull Science Europe Domain Data Protocols (DDPs)
bull Collections of example DMPs eg DCC RIOjournal Zenodo OpenAIRE
bull Existing costs guides eg LCRDM resource amp Wellcome guidance
bull Integrating registries into tools like DMPonline
bull RDA Working Group on Common standards for DMPs
bull Further support from FAIR Data EG OpenAIRE and others
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 27
What can you do
bull Share your DMP
ndash Publish in RIO - httpsriojournalcom
ndash Deposit in Zenodo - httpszenodoorg
ndash Add to DCC list - wwwdccacukshare-DMPs
bull Continue to provide feedback on the pilot and what works for you (or not)
bull Collaboration across research and support communities to develop your approach
bull Work with wider initiatives eg NOADs and international groups like RDA
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 28
Conclusions
Although there are several recommendations to the EC feedback was positive
bull Many found the process of developing a DMP a positive experience
bull Over half agree that the template was very useful
bull 19 of 68 stated they encountered no issues in following the EC guidelines
The EC has already iterated its open data guidelines and actively seeks input to
inform future policy developments
Further updates are likely The FAIR Data EG is to advise on future revisions of the
DMP template including the development of additional discipline specific guidance
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 29
Where to find out more
All the survey materials are on Zenodo
DOI 105281zenodo1120245
httpszenodoorgrecord1120245
bull Survey report
bull Raw data
bull Analysed dataset
bull Infographic
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 30
Acknowledgments
Marjan Grootveld DANS
Emilie Hermans UGent
Eliane Fankhauser DANS
Guidance that could be improved [Q7]
bull More subject- or field-
specific
bull Less complicated
technical or less vague
generic
bull Inclusion of examples
bull DMPs
bull Repositories
bull Interoperability
bull Cost estimation
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 11
Missing topics [Q8]
bull Discipline-specific approach
bull Access
bull Data quality assurance
bull Metadata and documentation
bull Software
bull Reproducibility
bull Costs
bull Storage
bull Legal issues
bull The format of the template
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 12
ldquoI think this would probably
vary according to individual
projects It is possible that a
one-size-fits-all approach is
not practicalrdquo
Issues encountered [Q9]
ldquoProcesses around the assessment of the
content are unclear to merdquo
ldquoAs stated before clarification of what is
an eligible cost regarding RDM is urgently
needed for researchers and also for the
RDM support teams at the universitiesrdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 13
Suggestions [Q10]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 14
ldquoWhich parts should be set up
already in the beginning and what
can be added later Would be
helpful to indicate needed and
nice to have for the starting point
or for different stagesrdquo
DMP publishing [Q12]
bull Half of free text answers rdquoYes ifhelliprdquo
bull Depending on confidentiality of the
information in the DMP
bull First reach a level of confidence in
publishing DMPs
bull The project has finished
bull No because it might bring project
partners in danger
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 15
Suggestions to EC [Q14]
ldquoTalk to researchers and ask them
whether the DMP requirements
are realistic Involve researchers
when developing disciplinary
guidancerdquo
ldquoFocus on technical exchange
format for these plans so they can
be shared between tools (ie
make the plans themselves FAIR)rdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 16
Providing feedback [Q15-16]
ldquoIn some cases I had to look together with researchers into their publications or WPs
description of a project in order to help them identify the type of data they are collecting in
order to include them in the DMP This exercise also helped them to identify which data might
have a re-use potential and which ones were submitted to special policies regulationsrdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 17
Time to review H2020 DMPs [Q18]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 18
27 said the H2020 process took much longer and was more complicated
based on 45 responses
19
Recommendationshellip
Image CC-BY-NC by Thomas Hawk
httpswwwflickrcomphotosthomashawk15634502093
1 Clarify EC requirements for DMPs
bull Collate all data-related and DMP guidelines in a single document
bull Provide public announcements and alerts to key groups when guidelines change
bull Be more explicit about when a DMP is and isnrsquot required
bull Clarify exactly what set of questions should be answered in DMPs
bull Provide a docx or rtf template to use as well as supporting online tools
httpeceuropaeuresearchparticipantsdatarefh2020grants_manualhioa_pilot
h2020-hi-oa-data-mgt_enpdf
2 Revise the DMP template structure
bull Regroup questions according to key activities and order in a more logical fashion
bull Identify which questions should be answered when
bull Where possible indicate secondary questions that can be skipped if not relevant
bull Include more yesno questions dropdown options or API integrations
bull Identify questions that will support evaluation and formulate them in a structured
way to enable automated compliance checks in future
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 21
3 Simplify DMP content amp terminology
bull Simplify the terminology used where possible
bull Provide a glossary of terms to assist researchers
bull Offer example answers particularly for questions with more technical terms
bull Seek to shorten the number of questions being asked
bull Provide some hierarchy or routing to the structuring of the questions
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 22
4 Discipline guidelines amp example answers
bull Provide discipline-specific guidelines
bull Offer example answers based on good practice in each domain
bull Give dropdown options or ranges pertinent to each field
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 23
We suggest that the EC builds on existing work and
collaborates with domain data centres and discipline-
specific groups such as learned societies
5 Publish DMPs and collate examples
bull Encourage projects to publish their DMPs
bull Offer a DMP registry service
bull Provide a library of lsquoapprovedrsquo DMPs representing
the range of funded research
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 24
Build on projectsrsquo existing willingness to publish and
work with external reviewers e-Infrastructure projects
and other groups eg LIBER to help approve examples
6 Include RDM costs in grant applications
bull Raise a few RDM questions alerts at the grant proposal stage
bull Provide worked examples that demonstrate what to include as RDM costs and how
bull Brief reviewers on eligible and expected costs
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 25
Clarification of what is an eligible cost regarding RDM is urgently needed for researchers
and also for the RDM support teams at the universities For example
bull If a project needs to buy extra storage from the own institution is that cost eligible
Or only external storage systems are eligible
bull Database curatorsadmins could be financed by EC projects
bull Are licenses for Electronic lab Notebooks (ELNs) for experimental data documentation
eligible costs
bull Are there differences in RDM eligible costs between consortium projects and IF or
ERC for example If there are differences it would be best if the EC provide examples
for all the type of calls
7 Explain DMP review practices
bull Endorse the internal assessment framework to ensure consistent use
bull Continue to provide internal training on reviewing DMPs in collaboration with
FOSTER Plus and other relevant groups
bull Develop circulate review guidelines and FAQs on practical implementation
bull Make a public statement on how DMPs are being reviewed ideally releasing the
assessment framework at the same time
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 26
Activities that may help
bull Science Europe Domain Data Protocols (DDPs)
bull Collections of example DMPs eg DCC RIOjournal Zenodo OpenAIRE
bull Existing costs guides eg LCRDM resource amp Wellcome guidance
bull Integrating registries into tools like DMPonline
bull RDA Working Group on Common standards for DMPs
bull Further support from FAIR Data EG OpenAIRE and others
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 27
What can you do
bull Share your DMP
ndash Publish in RIO - httpsriojournalcom
ndash Deposit in Zenodo - httpszenodoorg
ndash Add to DCC list - wwwdccacukshare-DMPs
bull Continue to provide feedback on the pilot and what works for you (or not)
bull Collaboration across research and support communities to develop your approach
bull Work with wider initiatives eg NOADs and international groups like RDA
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 28
Conclusions
Although there are several recommendations to the EC feedback was positive
bull Many found the process of developing a DMP a positive experience
bull Over half agree that the template was very useful
bull 19 of 68 stated they encountered no issues in following the EC guidelines
The EC has already iterated its open data guidelines and actively seeks input to
inform future policy developments
Further updates are likely The FAIR Data EG is to advise on future revisions of the
DMP template including the development of additional discipline specific guidance
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 29
Where to find out more
All the survey materials are on Zenodo
DOI 105281zenodo1120245
httpszenodoorgrecord1120245
bull Survey report
bull Raw data
bull Analysed dataset
bull Infographic
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 30
Acknowledgments
Marjan Grootveld DANS
Emilie Hermans UGent
Eliane Fankhauser DANS
Missing topics [Q8]
bull Discipline-specific approach
bull Access
bull Data quality assurance
bull Metadata and documentation
bull Software
bull Reproducibility
bull Costs
bull Storage
bull Legal issues
bull The format of the template
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 12
ldquoI think this would probably
vary according to individual
projects It is possible that a
one-size-fits-all approach is
not practicalrdquo
Issues encountered [Q9]
ldquoProcesses around the assessment of the
content are unclear to merdquo
ldquoAs stated before clarification of what is
an eligible cost regarding RDM is urgently
needed for researchers and also for the
RDM support teams at the universitiesrdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 13
Suggestions [Q10]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 14
ldquoWhich parts should be set up
already in the beginning and what
can be added later Would be
helpful to indicate needed and
nice to have for the starting point
or for different stagesrdquo
DMP publishing [Q12]
bull Half of free text answers rdquoYes ifhelliprdquo
bull Depending on confidentiality of the
information in the DMP
bull First reach a level of confidence in
publishing DMPs
bull The project has finished
bull No because it might bring project
partners in danger
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 15
Suggestions to EC [Q14]
ldquoTalk to researchers and ask them
whether the DMP requirements
are realistic Involve researchers
when developing disciplinary
guidancerdquo
ldquoFocus on technical exchange
format for these plans so they can
be shared between tools (ie
make the plans themselves FAIR)rdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 16
Providing feedback [Q15-16]
ldquoIn some cases I had to look together with researchers into their publications or WPs
description of a project in order to help them identify the type of data they are collecting in
order to include them in the DMP This exercise also helped them to identify which data might
have a re-use potential and which ones were submitted to special policies regulationsrdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 17
Time to review H2020 DMPs [Q18]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 18
27 said the H2020 process took much longer and was more complicated
based on 45 responses
19
Recommendationshellip
Image CC-BY-NC by Thomas Hawk
httpswwwflickrcomphotosthomashawk15634502093
1 Clarify EC requirements for DMPs
bull Collate all data-related and DMP guidelines in a single document
bull Provide public announcements and alerts to key groups when guidelines change
bull Be more explicit about when a DMP is and isnrsquot required
bull Clarify exactly what set of questions should be answered in DMPs
bull Provide a docx or rtf template to use as well as supporting online tools
httpeceuropaeuresearchparticipantsdatarefh2020grants_manualhioa_pilot
h2020-hi-oa-data-mgt_enpdf
2 Revise the DMP template structure
bull Regroup questions according to key activities and order in a more logical fashion
bull Identify which questions should be answered when
bull Where possible indicate secondary questions that can be skipped if not relevant
bull Include more yesno questions dropdown options or API integrations
bull Identify questions that will support evaluation and formulate them in a structured
way to enable automated compliance checks in future
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 21
3 Simplify DMP content amp terminology
bull Simplify the terminology used where possible
bull Provide a glossary of terms to assist researchers
bull Offer example answers particularly for questions with more technical terms
bull Seek to shorten the number of questions being asked
bull Provide some hierarchy or routing to the structuring of the questions
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 22
4 Discipline guidelines amp example answers
bull Provide discipline-specific guidelines
bull Offer example answers based on good practice in each domain
bull Give dropdown options or ranges pertinent to each field
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 23
We suggest that the EC builds on existing work and
collaborates with domain data centres and discipline-
specific groups such as learned societies
5 Publish DMPs and collate examples
bull Encourage projects to publish their DMPs
bull Offer a DMP registry service
bull Provide a library of lsquoapprovedrsquo DMPs representing
the range of funded research
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 24
Build on projectsrsquo existing willingness to publish and
work with external reviewers e-Infrastructure projects
and other groups eg LIBER to help approve examples
6 Include RDM costs in grant applications
bull Raise a few RDM questions alerts at the grant proposal stage
bull Provide worked examples that demonstrate what to include as RDM costs and how
bull Brief reviewers on eligible and expected costs
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 25
Clarification of what is an eligible cost regarding RDM is urgently needed for researchers
and also for the RDM support teams at the universities For example
bull If a project needs to buy extra storage from the own institution is that cost eligible
Or only external storage systems are eligible
bull Database curatorsadmins could be financed by EC projects
bull Are licenses for Electronic lab Notebooks (ELNs) for experimental data documentation
eligible costs
bull Are there differences in RDM eligible costs between consortium projects and IF or
ERC for example If there are differences it would be best if the EC provide examples
for all the type of calls
7 Explain DMP review practices
bull Endorse the internal assessment framework to ensure consistent use
bull Continue to provide internal training on reviewing DMPs in collaboration with
FOSTER Plus and other relevant groups
bull Develop circulate review guidelines and FAQs on practical implementation
bull Make a public statement on how DMPs are being reviewed ideally releasing the
assessment framework at the same time
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 26
Activities that may help
bull Science Europe Domain Data Protocols (DDPs)
bull Collections of example DMPs eg DCC RIOjournal Zenodo OpenAIRE
bull Existing costs guides eg LCRDM resource amp Wellcome guidance
bull Integrating registries into tools like DMPonline
bull RDA Working Group on Common standards for DMPs
bull Further support from FAIR Data EG OpenAIRE and others
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 27
What can you do
bull Share your DMP
ndash Publish in RIO - httpsriojournalcom
ndash Deposit in Zenodo - httpszenodoorg
ndash Add to DCC list - wwwdccacukshare-DMPs
bull Continue to provide feedback on the pilot and what works for you (or not)
bull Collaboration across research and support communities to develop your approach
bull Work with wider initiatives eg NOADs and international groups like RDA
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 28
Conclusions
Although there are several recommendations to the EC feedback was positive
bull Many found the process of developing a DMP a positive experience
bull Over half agree that the template was very useful
bull 19 of 68 stated they encountered no issues in following the EC guidelines
The EC has already iterated its open data guidelines and actively seeks input to
inform future policy developments
Further updates are likely The FAIR Data EG is to advise on future revisions of the
DMP template including the development of additional discipline specific guidance
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 29
Where to find out more
All the survey materials are on Zenodo
DOI 105281zenodo1120245
httpszenodoorgrecord1120245
bull Survey report
bull Raw data
bull Analysed dataset
bull Infographic
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 30
Acknowledgments
Marjan Grootveld DANS
Emilie Hermans UGent
Eliane Fankhauser DANS
Issues encountered [Q9]
ldquoProcesses around the assessment of the
content are unclear to merdquo
ldquoAs stated before clarification of what is
an eligible cost regarding RDM is urgently
needed for researchers and also for the
RDM support teams at the universitiesrdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 13
Suggestions [Q10]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 14
ldquoWhich parts should be set up
already in the beginning and what
can be added later Would be
helpful to indicate needed and
nice to have for the starting point
or for different stagesrdquo
DMP publishing [Q12]
bull Half of free text answers rdquoYes ifhelliprdquo
bull Depending on confidentiality of the
information in the DMP
bull First reach a level of confidence in
publishing DMPs
bull The project has finished
bull No because it might bring project
partners in danger
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 15
Suggestions to EC [Q14]
ldquoTalk to researchers and ask them
whether the DMP requirements
are realistic Involve researchers
when developing disciplinary
guidancerdquo
ldquoFocus on technical exchange
format for these plans so they can
be shared between tools (ie
make the plans themselves FAIR)rdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 16
Providing feedback [Q15-16]
ldquoIn some cases I had to look together with researchers into their publications or WPs
description of a project in order to help them identify the type of data they are collecting in
order to include them in the DMP This exercise also helped them to identify which data might
have a re-use potential and which ones were submitted to special policies regulationsrdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 17
Time to review H2020 DMPs [Q18]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 18
27 said the H2020 process took much longer and was more complicated
based on 45 responses
19
Recommendationshellip
Image CC-BY-NC by Thomas Hawk
httpswwwflickrcomphotosthomashawk15634502093
1 Clarify EC requirements for DMPs
bull Collate all data-related and DMP guidelines in a single document
bull Provide public announcements and alerts to key groups when guidelines change
bull Be more explicit about when a DMP is and isnrsquot required
bull Clarify exactly what set of questions should be answered in DMPs
bull Provide a docx or rtf template to use as well as supporting online tools
httpeceuropaeuresearchparticipantsdatarefh2020grants_manualhioa_pilot
h2020-hi-oa-data-mgt_enpdf
2 Revise the DMP template structure
bull Regroup questions according to key activities and order in a more logical fashion
bull Identify which questions should be answered when
bull Where possible indicate secondary questions that can be skipped if not relevant
bull Include more yesno questions dropdown options or API integrations
bull Identify questions that will support evaluation and formulate them in a structured
way to enable automated compliance checks in future
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 21
3 Simplify DMP content amp terminology
bull Simplify the terminology used where possible
bull Provide a glossary of terms to assist researchers
bull Offer example answers particularly for questions with more technical terms
bull Seek to shorten the number of questions being asked
bull Provide some hierarchy or routing to the structuring of the questions
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 22
4 Discipline guidelines amp example answers
bull Provide discipline-specific guidelines
bull Offer example answers based on good practice in each domain
bull Give dropdown options or ranges pertinent to each field
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 23
We suggest that the EC builds on existing work and
collaborates with domain data centres and discipline-
specific groups such as learned societies
5 Publish DMPs and collate examples
bull Encourage projects to publish their DMPs
bull Offer a DMP registry service
bull Provide a library of lsquoapprovedrsquo DMPs representing
the range of funded research
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 24
Build on projectsrsquo existing willingness to publish and
work with external reviewers e-Infrastructure projects
and other groups eg LIBER to help approve examples
6 Include RDM costs in grant applications
bull Raise a few RDM questions alerts at the grant proposal stage
bull Provide worked examples that demonstrate what to include as RDM costs and how
bull Brief reviewers on eligible and expected costs
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 25
Clarification of what is an eligible cost regarding RDM is urgently needed for researchers
and also for the RDM support teams at the universities For example
bull If a project needs to buy extra storage from the own institution is that cost eligible
Or only external storage systems are eligible
bull Database curatorsadmins could be financed by EC projects
bull Are licenses for Electronic lab Notebooks (ELNs) for experimental data documentation
eligible costs
bull Are there differences in RDM eligible costs between consortium projects and IF or
ERC for example If there are differences it would be best if the EC provide examples
for all the type of calls
7 Explain DMP review practices
bull Endorse the internal assessment framework to ensure consistent use
bull Continue to provide internal training on reviewing DMPs in collaboration with
FOSTER Plus and other relevant groups
bull Develop circulate review guidelines and FAQs on practical implementation
bull Make a public statement on how DMPs are being reviewed ideally releasing the
assessment framework at the same time
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 26
Activities that may help
bull Science Europe Domain Data Protocols (DDPs)
bull Collections of example DMPs eg DCC RIOjournal Zenodo OpenAIRE
bull Existing costs guides eg LCRDM resource amp Wellcome guidance
bull Integrating registries into tools like DMPonline
bull RDA Working Group on Common standards for DMPs
bull Further support from FAIR Data EG OpenAIRE and others
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 27
What can you do
bull Share your DMP
ndash Publish in RIO - httpsriojournalcom
ndash Deposit in Zenodo - httpszenodoorg
ndash Add to DCC list - wwwdccacukshare-DMPs
bull Continue to provide feedback on the pilot and what works for you (or not)
bull Collaboration across research and support communities to develop your approach
bull Work with wider initiatives eg NOADs and international groups like RDA
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 28
Conclusions
Although there are several recommendations to the EC feedback was positive
bull Many found the process of developing a DMP a positive experience
bull Over half agree that the template was very useful
bull 19 of 68 stated they encountered no issues in following the EC guidelines
The EC has already iterated its open data guidelines and actively seeks input to
inform future policy developments
Further updates are likely The FAIR Data EG is to advise on future revisions of the
DMP template including the development of additional discipline specific guidance
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 29
Where to find out more
All the survey materials are on Zenodo
DOI 105281zenodo1120245
httpszenodoorgrecord1120245
bull Survey report
bull Raw data
bull Analysed dataset
bull Infographic
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 30
Acknowledgments
Marjan Grootveld DANS
Emilie Hermans UGent
Eliane Fankhauser DANS
Suggestions [Q10]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 14
ldquoWhich parts should be set up
already in the beginning and what
can be added later Would be
helpful to indicate needed and
nice to have for the starting point
or for different stagesrdquo
DMP publishing [Q12]
bull Half of free text answers rdquoYes ifhelliprdquo
bull Depending on confidentiality of the
information in the DMP
bull First reach a level of confidence in
publishing DMPs
bull The project has finished
bull No because it might bring project
partners in danger
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 15
Suggestions to EC [Q14]
ldquoTalk to researchers and ask them
whether the DMP requirements
are realistic Involve researchers
when developing disciplinary
guidancerdquo
ldquoFocus on technical exchange
format for these plans so they can
be shared between tools (ie
make the plans themselves FAIR)rdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 16
Providing feedback [Q15-16]
ldquoIn some cases I had to look together with researchers into their publications or WPs
description of a project in order to help them identify the type of data they are collecting in
order to include them in the DMP This exercise also helped them to identify which data might
have a re-use potential and which ones were submitted to special policies regulationsrdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 17
Time to review H2020 DMPs [Q18]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 18
27 said the H2020 process took much longer and was more complicated
based on 45 responses
19
Recommendationshellip
Image CC-BY-NC by Thomas Hawk
httpswwwflickrcomphotosthomashawk15634502093
1 Clarify EC requirements for DMPs
bull Collate all data-related and DMP guidelines in a single document
bull Provide public announcements and alerts to key groups when guidelines change
bull Be more explicit about when a DMP is and isnrsquot required
bull Clarify exactly what set of questions should be answered in DMPs
bull Provide a docx or rtf template to use as well as supporting online tools
httpeceuropaeuresearchparticipantsdatarefh2020grants_manualhioa_pilot
h2020-hi-oa-data-mgt_enpdf
2 Revise the DMP template structure
bull Regroup questions according to key activities and order in a more logical fashion
bull Identify which questions should be answered when
bull Where possible indicate secondary questions that can be skipped if not relevant
bull Include more yesno questions dropdown options or API integrations
bull Identify questions that will support evaluation and formulate them in a structured
way to enable automated compliance checks in future
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 21
3 Simplify DMP content amp terminology
bull Simplify the terminology used where possible
bull Provide a glossary of terms to assist researchers
bull Offer example answers particularly for questions with more technical terms
bull Seek to shorten the number of questions being asked
bull Provide some hierarchy or routing to the structuring of the questions
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 22
4 Discipline guidelines amp example answers
bull Provide discipline-specific guidelines
bull Offer example answers based on good practice in each domain
bull Give dropdown options or ranges pertinent to each field
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 23
We suggest that the EC builds on existing work and
collaborates with domain data centres and discipline-
specific groups such as learned societies
5 Publish DMPs and collate examples
bull Encourage projects to publish their DMPs
bull Offer a DMP registry service
bull Provide a library of lsquoapprovedrsquo DMPs representing
the range of funded research
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 24
Build on projectsrsquo existing willingness to publish and
work with external reviewers e-Infrastructure projects
and other groups eg LIBER to help approve examples
6 Include RDM costs in grant applications
bull Raise a few RDM questions alerts at the grant proposal stage
bull Provide worked examples that demonstrate what to include as RDM costs and how
bull Brief reviewers on eligible and expected costs
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 25
Clarification of what is an eligible cost regarding RDM is urgently needed for researchers
and also for the RDM support teams at the universities For example
bull If a project needs to buy extra storage from the own institution is that cost eligible
Or only external storage systems are eligible
bull Database curatorsadmins could be financed by EC projects
bull Are licenses for Electronic lab Notebooks (ELNs) for experimental data documentation
eligible costs
bull Are there differences in RDM eligible costs between consortium projects and IF or
ERC for example If there are differences it would be best if the EC provide examples
for all the type of calls
7 Explain DMP review practices
bull Endorse the internal assessment framework to ensure consistent use
bull Continue to provide internal training on reviewing DMPs in collaboration with
FOSTER Plus and other relevant groups
bull Develop circulate review guidelines and FAQs on practical implementation
bull Make a public statement on how DMPs are being reviewed ideally releasing the
assessment framework at the same time
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 26
Activities that may help
bull Science Europe Domain Data Protocols (DDPs)
bull Collections of example DMPs eg DCC RIOjournal Zenodo OpenAIRE
bull Existing costs guides eg LCRDM resource amp Wellcome guidance
bull Integrating registries into tools like DMPonline
bull RDA Working Group on Common standards for DMPs
bull Further support from FAIR Data EG OpenAIRE and others
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 27
What can you do
bull Share your DMP
ndash Publish in RIO - httpsriojournalcom
ndash Deposit in Zenodo - httpszenodoorg
ndash Add to DCC list - wwwdccacukshare-DMPs
bull Continue to provide feedback on the pilot and what works for you (or not)
bull Collaboration across research and support communities to develop your approach
bull Work with wider initiatives eg NOADs and international groups like RDA
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 28
Conclusions
Although there are several recommendations to the EC feedback was positive
bull Many found the process of developing a DMP a positive experience
bull Over half agree that the template was very useful
bull 19 of 68 stated they encountered no issues in following the EC guidelines
The EC has already iterated its open data guidelines and actively seeks input to
inform future policy developments
Further updates are likely The FAIR Data EG is to advise on future revisions of the
DMP template including the development of additional discipline specific guidance
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 29
Where to find out more
All the survey materials are on Zenodo
DOI 105281zenodo1120245
httpszenodoorgrecord1120245
bull Survey report
bull Raw data
bull Analysed dataset
bull Infographic
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 30
Acknowledgments
Marjan Grootveld DANS
Emilie Hermans UGent
Eliane Fankhauser DANS
DMP publishing [Q12]
bull Half of free text answers rdquoYes ifhelliprdquo
bull Depending on confidentiality of the
information in the DMP
bull First reach a level of confidence in
publishing DMPs
bull The project has finished
bull No because it might bring project
partners in danger
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 15
Suggestions to EC [Q14]
ldquoTalk to researchers and ask them
whether the DMP requirements
are realistic Involve researchers
when developing disciplinary
guidancerdquo
ldquoFocus on technical exchange
format for these plans so they can
be shared between tools (ie
make the plans themselves FAIR)rdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 16
Providing feedback [Q15-16]
ldquoIn some cases I had to look together with researchers into their publications or WPs
description of a project in order to help them identify the type of data they are collecting in
order to include them in the DMP This exercise also helped them to identify which data might
have a re-use potential and which ones were submitted to special policies regulationsrdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 17
Time to review H2020 DMPs [Q18]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 18
27 said the H2020 process took much longer and was more complicated
based on 45 responses
19
Recommendationshellip
Image CC-BY-NC by Thomas Hawk
httpswwwflickrcomphotosthomashawk15634502093
1 Clarify EC requirements for DMPs
bull Collate all data-related and DMP guidelines in a single document
bull Provide public announcements and alerts to key groups when guidelines change
bull Be more explicit about when a DMP is and isnrsquot required
bull Clarify exactly what set of questions should be answered in DMPs
bull Provide a docx or rtf template to use as well as supporting online tools
httpeceuropaeuresearchparticipantsdatarefh2020grants_manualhioa_pilot
h2020-hi-oa-data-mgt_enpdf
2 Revise the DMP template structure
bull Regroup questions according to key activities and order in a more logical fashion
bull Identify which questions should be answered when
bull Where possible indicate secondary questions that can be skipped if not relevant
bull Include more yesno questions dropdown options or API integrations
bull Identify questions that will support evaluation and formulate them in a structured
way to enable automated compliance checks in future
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 21
3 Simplify DMP content amp terminology
bull Simplify the terminology used where possible
bull Provide a glossary of terms to assist researchers
bull Offer example answers particularly for questions with more technical terms
bull Seek to shorten the number of questions being asked
bull Provide some hierarchy or routing to the structuring of the questions
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 22
4 Discipline guidelines amp example answers
bull Provide discipline-specific guidelines
bull Offer example answers based on good practice in each domain
bull Give dropdown options or ranges pertinent to each field
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 23
We suggest that the EC builds on existing work and
collaborates with domain data centres and discipline-
specific groups such as learned societies
5 Publish DMPs and collate examples
bull Encourage projects to publish their DMPs
bull Offer a DMP registry service
bull Provide a library of lsquoapprovedrsquo DMPs representing
the range of funded research
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 24
Build on projectsrsquo existing willingness to publish and
work with external reviewers e-Infrastructure projects
and other groups eg LIBER to help approve examples
6 Include RDM costs in grant applications
bull Raise a few RDM questions alerts at the grant proposal stage
bull Provide worked examples that demonstrate what to include as RDM costs and how
bull Brief reviewers on eligible and expected costs
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 25
Clarification of what is an eligible cost regarding RDM is urgently needed for researchers
and also for the RDM support teams at the universities For example
bull If a project needs to buy extra storage from the own institution is that cost eligible
Or only external storage systems are eligible
bull Database curatorsadmins could be financed by EC projects
bull Are licenses for Electronic lab Notebooks (ELNs) for experimental data documentation
eligible costs
bull Are there differences in RDM eligible costs between consortium projects and IF or
ERC for example If there are differences it would be best if the EC provide examples
for all the type of calls
7 Explain DMP review practices
bull Endorse the internal assessment framework to ensure consistent use
bull Continue to provide internal training on reviewing DMPs in collaboration with
FOSTER Plus and other relevant groups
bull Develop circulate review guidelines and FAQs on practical implementation
bull Make a public statement on how DMPs are being reviewed ideally releasing the
assessment framework at the same time
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 26
Activities that may help
bull Science Europe Domain Data Protocols (DDPs)
bull Collections of example DMPs eg DCC RIOjournal Zenodo OpenAIRE
bull Existing costs guides eg LCRDM resource amp Wellcome guidance
bull Integrating registries into tools like DMPonline
bull RDA Working Group on Common standards for DMPs
bull Further support from FAIR Data EG OpenAIRE and others
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 27
What can you do
bull Share your DMP
ndash Publish in RIO - httpsriojournalcom
ndash Deposit in Zenodo - httpszenodoorg
ndash Add to DCC list - wwwdccacukshare-DMPs
bull Continue to provide feedback on the pilot and what works for you (or not)
bull Collaboration across research and support communities to develop your approach
bull Work with wider initiatives eg NOADs and international groups like RDA
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 28
Conclusions
Although there are several recommendations to the EC feedback was positive
bull Many found the process of developing a DMP a positive experience
bull Over half agree that the template was very useful
bull 19 of 68 stated they encountered no issues in following the EC guidelines
The EC has already iterated its open data guidelines and actively seeks input to
inform future policy developments
Further updates are likely The FAIR Data EG is to advise on future revisions of the
DMP template including the development of additional discipline specific guidance
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 29
Where to find out more
All the survey materials are on Zenodo
DOI 105281zenodo1120245
httpszenodoorgrecord1120245
bull Survey report
bull Raw data
bull Analysed dataset
bull Infographic
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 30
Acknowledgments
Marjan Grootveld DANS
Emilie Hermans UGent
Eliane Fankhauser DANS
Suggestions to EC [Q14]
ldquoTalk to researchers and ask them
whether the DMP requirements
are realistic Involve researchers
when developing disciplinary
guidancerdquo
ldquoFocus on technical exchange
format for these plans so they can
be shared between tools (ie
make the plans themselves FAIR)rdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 16
Providing feedback [Q15-16]
ldquoIn some cases I had to look together with researchers into their publications or WPs
description of a project in order to help them identify the type of data they are collecting in
order to include them in the DMP This exercise also helped them to identify which data might
have a re-use potential and which ones were submitted to special policies regulationsrdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 17
Time to review H2020 DMPs [Q18]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 18
27 said the H2020 process took much longer and was more complicated
based on 45 responses
19
Recommendationshellip
Image CC-BY-NC by Thomas Hawk
httpswwwflickrcomphotosthomashawk15634502093
1 Clarify EC requirements for DMPs
bull Collate all data-related and DMP guidelines in a single document
bull Provide public announcements and alerts to key groups when guidelines change
bull Be more explicit about when a DMP is and isnrsquot required
bull Clarify exactly what set of questions should be answered in DMPs
bull Provide a docx or rtf template to use as well as supporting online tools
httpeceuropaeuresearchparticipantsdatarefh2020grants_manualhioa_pilot
h2020-hi-oa-data-mgt_enpdf
2 Revise the DMP template structure
bull Regroup questions according to key activities and order in a more logical fashion
bull Identify which questions should be answered when
bull Where possible indicate secondary questions that can be skipped if not relevant
bull Include more yesno questions dropdown options or API integrations
bull Identify questions that will support evaluation and formulate them in a structured
way to enable automated compliance checks in future
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 21
3 Simplify DMP content amp terminology
bull Simplify the terminology used where possible
bull Provide a glossary of terms to assist researchers
bull Offer example answers particularly for questions with more technical terms
bull Seek to shorten the number of questions being asked
bull Provide some hierarchy or routing to the structuring of the questions
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 22
4 Discipline guidelines amp example answers
bull Provide discipline-specific guidelines
bull Offer example answers based on good practice in each domain
bull Give dropdown options or ranges pertinent to each field
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 23
We suggest that the EC builds on existing work and
collaborates with domain data centres and discipline-
specific groups such as learned societies
5 Publish DMPs and collate examples
bull Encourage projects to publish their DMPs
bull Offer a DMP registry service
bull Provide a library of lsquoapprovedrsquo DMPs representing
the range of funded research
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 24
Build on projectsrsquo existing willingness to publish and
work with external reviewers e-Infrastructure projects
and other groups eg LIBER to help approve examples
6 Include RDM costs in grant applications
bull Raise a few RDM questions alerts at the grant proposal stage
bull Provide worked examples that demonstrate what to include as RDM costs and how
bull Brief reviewers on eligible and expected costs
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 25
Clarification of what is an eligible cost regarding RDM is urgently needed for researchers
and also for the RDM support teams at the universities For example
bull If a project needs to buy extra storage from the own institution is that cost eligible
Or only external storage systems are eligible
bull Database curatorsadmins could be financed by EC projects
bull Are licenses for Electronic lab Notebooks (ELNs) for experimental data documentation
eligible costs
bull Are there differences in RDM eligible costs between consortium projects and IF or
ERC for example If there are differences it would be best if the EC provide examples
for all the type of calls
7 Explain DMP review practices
bull Endorse the internal assessment framework to ensure consistent use
bull Continue to provide internal training on reviewing DMPs in collaboration with
FOSTER Plus and other relevant groups
bull Develop circulate review guidelines and FAQs on practical implementation
bull Make a public statement on how DMPs are being reviewed ideally releasing the
assessment framework at the same time
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 26
Activities that may help
bull Science Europe Domain Data Protocols (DDPs)
bull Collections of example DMPs eg DCC RIOjournal Zenodo OpenAIRE
bull Existing costs guides eg LCRDM resource amp Wellcome guidance
bull Integrating registries into tools like DMPonline
bull RDA Working Group on Common standards for DMPs
bull Further support from FAIR Data EG OpenAIRE and others
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 27
What can you do
bull Share your DMP
ndash Publish in RIO - httpsriojournalcom
ndash Deposit in Zenodo - httpszenodoorg
ndash Add to DCC list - wwwdccacukshare-DMPs
bull Continue to provide feedback on the pilot and what works for you (or not)
bull Collaboration across research and support communities to develop your approach
bull Work with wider initiatives eg NOADs and international groups like RDA
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 28
Conclusions
Although there are several recommendations to the EC feedback was positive
bull Many found the process of developing a DMP a positive experience
bull Over half agree that the template was very useful
bull 19 of 68 stated they encountered no issues in following the EC guidelines
The EC has already iterated its open data guidelines and actively seeks input to
inform future policy developments
Further updates are likely The FAIR Data EG is to advise on future revisions of the
DMP template including the development of additional discipline specific guidance
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 29
Where to find out more
All the survey materials are on Zenodo
DOI 105281zenodo1120245
httpszenodoorgrecord1120245
bull Survey report
bull Raw data
bull Analysed dataset
bull Infographic
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 30
Acknowledgments
Marjan Grootveld DANS
Emilie Hermans UGent
Eliane Fankhauser DANS
Providing feedback [Q15-16]
ldquoIn some cases I had to look together with researchers into their publications or WPs
description of a project in order to help them identify the type of data they are collecting in
order to include them in the DMP This exercise also helped them to identify which data might
have a re-use potential and which ones were submitted to special policies regulationsrdquo
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 17
Time to review H2020 DMPs [Q18]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 18
27 said the H2020 process took much longer and was more complicated
based on 45 responses
19
Recommendationshellip
Image CC-BY-NC by Thomas Hawk
httpswwwflickrcomphotosthomashawk15634502093
1 Clarify EC requirements for DMPs
bull Collate all data-related and DMP guidelines in a single document
bull Provide public announcements and alerts to key groups when guidelines change
bull Be more explicit about when a DMP is and isnrsquot required
bull Clarify exactly what set of questions should be answered in DMPs
bull Provide a docx or rtf template to use as well as supporting online tools
httpeceuropaeuresearchparticipantsdatarefh2020grants_manualhioa_pilot
h2020-hi-oa-data-mgt_enpdf
2 Revise the DMP template structure
bull Regroup questions according to key activities and order in a more logical fashion
bull Identify which questions should be answered when
bull Where possible indicate secondary questions that can be skipped if not relevant
bull Include more yesno questions dropdown options or API integrations
bull Identify questions that will support evaluation and formulate them in a structured
way to enable automated compliance checks in future
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 21
3 Simplify DMP content amp terminology
bull Simplify the terminology used where possible
bull Provide a glossary of terms to assist researchers
bull Offer example answers particularly for questions with more technical terms
bull Seek to shorten the number of questions being asked
bull Provide some hierarchy or routing to the structuring of the questions
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 22
4 Discipline guidelines amp example answers
bull Provide discipline-specific guidelines
bull Offer example answers based on good practice in each domain
bull Give dropdown options or ranges pertinent to each field
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 23
We suggest that the EC builds on existing work and
collaborates with domain data centres and discipline-
specific groups such as learned societies
5 Publish DMPs and collate examples
bull Encourage projects to publish their DMPs
bull Offer a DMP registry service
bull Provide a library of lsquoapprovedrsquo DMPs representing
the range of funded research
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 24
Build on projectsrsquo existing willingness to publish and
work with external reviewers e-Infrastructure projects
and other groups eg LIBER to help approve examples
6 Include RDM costs in grant applications
bull Raise a few RDM questions alerts at the grant proposal stage
bull Provide worked examples that demonstrate what to include as RDM costs and how
bull Brief reviewers on eligible and expected costs
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 25
Clarification of what is an eligible cost regarding RDM is urgently needed for researchers
and also for the RDM support teams at the universities For example
bull If a project needs to buy extra storage from the own institution is that cost eligible
Or only external storage systems are eligible
bull Database curatorsadmins could be financed by EC projects
bull Are licenses for Electronic lab Notebooks (ELNs) for experimental data documentation
eligible costs
bull Are there differences in RDM eligible costs between consortium projects and IF or
ERC for example If there are differences it would be best if the EC provide examples
for all the type of calls
7 Explain DMP review practices
bull Endorse the internal assessment framework to ensure consistent use
bull Continue to provide internal training on reviewing DMPs in collaboration with
FOSTER Plus and other relevant groups
bull Develop circulate review guidelines and FAQs on practical implementation
bull Make a public statement on how DMPs are being reviewed ideally releasing the
assessment framework at the same time
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 26
Activities that may help
bull Science Europe Domain Data Protocols (DDPs)
bull Collections of example DMPs eg DCC RIOjournal Zenodo OpenAIRE
bull Existing costs guides eg LCRDM resource amp Wellcome guidance
bull Integrating registries into tools like DMPonline
bull RDA Working Group on Common standards for DMPs
bull Further support from FAIR Data EG OpenAIRE and others
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 27
What can you do
bull Share your DMP
ndash Publish in RIO - httpsriojournalcom
ndash Deposit in Zenodo - httpszenodoorg
ndash Add to DCC list - wwwdccacukshare-DMPs
bull Continue to provide feedback on the pilot and what works for you (or not)
bull Collaboration across research and support communities to develop your approach
bull Work with wider initiatives eg NOADs and international groups like RDA
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 28
Conclusions
Although there are several recommendations to the EC feedback was positive
bull Many found the process of developing a DMP a positive experience
bull Over half agree that the template was very useful
bull 19 of 68 stated they encountered no issues in following the EC guidelines
The EC has already iterated its open data guidelines and actively seeks input to
inform future policy developments
Further updates are likely The FAIR Data EG is to advise on future revisions of the
DMP template including the development of additional discipline specific guidance
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 29
Where to find out more
All the survey materials are on Zenodo
DOI 105281zenodo1120245
httpszenodoorgrecord1120245
bull Survey report
bull Raw data
bull Analysed dataset
bull Infographic
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 30
Acknowledgments
Marjan Grootveld DANS
Emilie Hermans UGent
Eliane Fankhauser DANS
Time to review H2020 DMPs [Q18]
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 18
27 said the H2020 process took much longer and was more complicated
based on 45 responses
19
Recommendationshellip
Image CC-BY-NC by Thomas Hawk
httpswwwflickrcomphotosthomashawk15634502093
1 Clarify EC requirements for DMPs
bull Collate all data-related and DMP guidelines in a single document
bull Provide public announcements and alerts to key groups when guidelines change
bull Be more explicit about when a DMP is and isnrsquot required
bull Clarify exactly what set of questions should be answered in DMPs
bull Provide a docx or rtf template to use as well as supporting online tools
httpeceuropaeuresearchparticipantsdatarefh2020grants_manualhioa_pilot
h2020-hi-oa-data-mgt_enpdf
2 Revise the DMP template structure
bull Regroup questions according to key activities and order in a more logical fashion
bull Identify which questions should be answered when
bull Where possible indicate secondary questions that can be skipped if not relevant
bull Include more yesno questions dropdown options or API integrations
bull Identify questions that will support evaluation and formulate them in a structured
way to enable automated compliance checks in future
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 21
3 Simplify DMP content amp terminology
bull Simplify the terminology used where possible
bull Provide a glossary of terms to assist researchers
bull Offer example answers particularly for questions with more technical terms
bull Seek to shorten the number of questions being asked
bull Provide some hierarchy or routing to the structuring of the questions
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 22
4 Discipline guidelines amp example answers
bull Provide discipline-specific guidelines
bull Offer example answers based on good practice in each domain
bull Give dropdown options or ranges pertinent to each field
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 23
We suggest that the EC builds on existing work and
collaborates with domain data centres and discipline-
specific groups such as learned societies
5 Publish DMPs and collate examples
bull Encourage projects to publish their DMPs
bull Offer a DMP registry service
bull Provide a library of lsquoapprovedrsquo DMPs representing
the range of funded research
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 24
Build on projectsrsquo existing willingness to publish and
work with external reviewers e-Infrastructure projects
and other groups eg LIBER to help approve examples
6 Include RDM costs in grant applications
bull Raise a few RDM questions alerts at the grant proposal stage
bull Provide worked examples that demonstrate what to include as RDM costs and how
bull Brief reviewers on eligible and expected costs
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 25
Clarification of what is an eligible cost regarding RDM is urgently needed for researchers
and also for the RDM support teams at the universities For example
bull If a project needs to buy extra storage from the own institution is that cost eligible
Or only external storage systems are eligible
bull Database curatorsadmins could be financed by EC projects
bull Are licenses for Electronic lab Notebooks (ELNs) for experimental data documentation
eligible costs
bull Are there differences in RDM eligible costs between consortium projects and IF or
ERC for example If there are differences it would be best if the EC provide examples
for all the type of calls
7 Explain DMP review practices
bull Endorse the internal assessment framework to ensure consistent use
bull Continue to provide internal training on reviewing DMPs in collaboration with
FOSTER Plus and other relevant groups
bull Develop circulate review guidelines and FAQs on practical implementation
bull Make a public statement on how DMPs are being reviewed ideally releasing the
assessment framework at the same time
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 26
Activities that may help
bull Science Europe Domain Data Protocols (DDPs)
bull Collections of example DMPs eg DCC RIOjournal Zenodo OpenAIRE
bull Existing costs guides eg LCRDM resource amp Wellcome guidance
bull Integrating registries into tools like DMPonline
bull RDA Working Group on Common standards for DMPs
bull Further support from FAIR Data EG OpenAIRE and others
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 27
What can you do
bull Share your DMP
ndash Publish in RIO - httpsriojournalcom
ndash Deposit in Zenodo - httpszenodoorg
ndash Add to DCC list - wwwdccacukshare-DMPs
bull Continue to provide feedback on the pilot and what works for you (or not)
bull Collaboration across research and support communities to develop your approach
bull Work with wider initiatives eg NOADs and international groups like RDA
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 28
Conclusions
Although there are several recommendations to the EC feedback was positive
bull Many found the process of developing a DMP a positive experience
bull Over half agree that the template was very useful
bull 19 of 68 stated they encountered no issues in following the EC guidelines
The EC has already iterated its open data guidelines and actively seeks input to
inform future policy developments
Further updates are likely The FAIR Data EG is to advise on future revisions of the
DMP template including the development of additional discipline specific guidance
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 29
Where to find out more
All the survey materials are on Zenodo
DOI 105281zenodo1120245
httpszenodoorgrecord1120245
bull Survey report
bull Raw data
bull Analysed dataset
bull Infographic
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 30
Acknowledgments
Marjan Grootveld DANS
Emilie Hermans UGent
Eliane Fankhauser DANS
19
Recommendationshellip
Image CC-BY-NC by Thomas Hawk
httpswwwflickrcomphotosthomashawk15634502093
1 Clarify EC requirements for DMPs
bull Collate all data-related and DMP guidelines in a single document
bull Provide public announcements and alerts to key groups when guidelines change
bull Be more explicit about when a DMP is and isnrsquot required
bull Clarify exactly what set of questions should be answered in DMPs
bull Provide a docx or rtf template to use as well as supporting online tools
httpeceuropaeuresearchparticipantsdatarefh2020grants_manualhioa_pilot
h2020-hi-oa-data-mgt_enpdf
2 Revise the DMP template structure
bull Regroup questions according to key activities and order in a more logical fashion
bull Identify which questions should be answered when
bull Where possible indicate secondary questions that can be skipped if not relevant
bull Include more yesno questions dropdown options or API integrations
bull Identify questions that will support evaluation and formulate them in a structured
way to enable automated compliance checks in future
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 21
3 Simplify DMP content amp terminology
bull Simplify the terminology used where possible
bull Provide a glossary of terms to assist researchers
bull Offer example answers particularly for questions with more technical terms
bull Seek to shorten the number of questions being asked
bull Provide some hierarchy or routing to the structuring of the questions
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 22
4 Discipline guidelines amp example answers
bull Provide discipline-specific guidelines
bull Offer example answers based on good practice in each domain
bull Give dropdown options or ranges pertinent to each field
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 23
We suggest that the EC builds on existing work and
collaborates with domain data centres and discipline-
specific groups such as learned societies
5 Publish DMPs and collate examples
bull Encourage projects to publish their DMPs
bull Offer a DMP registry service
bull Provide a library of lsquoapprovedrsquo DMPs representing
the range of funded research
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 24
Build on projectsrsquo existing willingness to publish and
work with external reviewers e-Infrastructure projects
and other groups eg LIBER to help approve examples
6 Include RDM costs in grant applications
bull Raise a few RDM questions alerts at the grant proposal stage
bull Provide worked examples that demonstrate what to include as RDM costs and how
bull Brief reviewers on eligible and expected costs
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 25
Clarification of what is an eligible cost regarding RDM is urgently needed for researchers
and also for the RDM support teams at the universities For example
bull If a project needs to buy extra storage from the own institution is that cost eligible
Or only external storage systems are eligible
bull Database curatorsadmins could be financed by EC projects
bull Are licenses for Electronic lab Notebooks (ELNs) for experimental data documentation
eligible costs
bull Are there differences in RDM eligible costs between consortium projects and IF or
ERC for example If there are differences it would be best if the EC provide examples
for all the type of calls
7 Explain DMP review practices
bull Endorse the internal assessment framework to ensure consistent use
bull Continue to provide internal training on reviewing DMPs in collaboration with
FOSTER Plus and other relevant groups
bull Develop circulate review guidelines and FAQs on practical implementation
bull Make a public statement on how DMPs are being reviewed ideally releasing the
assessment framework at the same time
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 26
Activities that may help
bull Science Europe Domain Data Protocols (DDPs)
bull Collections of example DMPs eg DCC RIOjournal Zenodo OpenAIRE
bull Existing costs guides eg LCRDM resource amp Wellcome guidance
bull Integrating registries into tools like DMPonline
bull RDA Working Group on Common standards for DMPs
bull Further support from FAIR Data EG OpenAIRE and others
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 27
What can you do
bull Share your DMP
ndash Publish in RIO - httpsriojournalcom
ndash Deposit in Zenodo - httpszenodoorg
ndash Add to DCC list - wwwdccacukshare-DMPs
bull Continue to provide feedback on the pilot and what works for you (or not)
bull Collaboration across research and support communities to develop your approach
bull Work with wider initiatives eg NOADs and international groups like RDA
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 28
Conclusions
Although there are several recommendations to the EC feedback was positive
bull Many found the process of developing a DMP a positive experience
bull Over half agree that the template was very useful
bull 19 of 68 stated they encountered no issues in following the EC guidelines
The EC has already iterated its open data guidelines and actively seeks input to
inform future policy developments
Further updates are likely The FAIR Data EG is to advise on future revisions of the
DMP template including the development of additional discipline specific guidance
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 29
Where to find out more
All the survey materials are on Zenodo
DOI 105281zenodo1120245
httpszenodoorgrecord1120245
bull Survey report
bull Raw data
bull Analysed dataset
bull Infographic
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 30
Acknowledgments
Marjan Grootveld DANS
Emilie Hermans UGent
Eliane Fankhauser DANS
1 Clarify EC requirements for DMPs
bull Collate all data-related and DMP guidelines in a single document
bull Provide public announcements and alerts to key groups when guidelines change
bull Be more explicit about when a DMP is and isnrsquot required
bull Clarify exactly what set of questions should be answered in DMPs
bull Provide a docx or rtf template to use as well as supporting online tools
httpeceuropaeuresearchparticipantsdatarefh2020grants_manualhioa_pilot
h2020-hi-oa-data-mgt_enpdf
2 Revise the DMP template structure
bull Regroup questions according to key activities and order in a more logical fashion
bull Identify which questions should be answered when
bull Where possible indicate secondary questions that can be skipped if not relevant
bull Include more yesno questions dropdown options or API integrations
bull Identify questions that will support evaluation and formulate them in a structured
way to enable automated compliance checks in future
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 21
3 Simplify DMP content amp terminology
bull Simplify the terminology used where possible
bull Provide a glossary of terms to assist researchers
bull Offer example answers particularly for questions with more technical terms
bull Seek to shorten the number of questions being asked
bull Provide some hierarchy or routing to the structuring of the questions
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 22
4 Discipline guidelines amp example answers
bull Provide discipline-specific guidelines
bull Offer example answers based on good practice in each domain
bull Give dropdown options or ranges pertinent to each field
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 23
We suggest that the EC builds on existing work and
collaborates with domain data centres and discipline-
specific groups such as learned societies
5 Publish DMPs and collate examples
bull Encourage projects to publish their DMPs
bull Offer a DMP registry service
bull Provide a library of lsquoapprovedrsquo DMPs representing
the range of funded research
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 24
Build on projectsrsquo existing willingness to publish and
work with external reviewers e-Infrastructure projects
and other groups eg LIBER to help approve examples
6 Include RDM costs in grant applications
bull Raise a few RDM questions alerts at the grant proposal stage
bull Provide worked examples that demonstrate what to include as RDM costs and how
bull Brief reviewers on eligible and expected costs
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 25
Clarification of what is an eligible cost regarding RDM is urgently needed for researchers
and also for the RDM support teams at the universities For example
bull If a project needs to buy extra storage from the own institution is that cost eligible
Or only external storage systems are eligible
bull Database curatorsadmins could be financed by EC projects
bull Are licenses for Electronic lab Notebooks (ELNs) for experimental data documentation
eligible costs
bull Are there differences in RDM eligible costs between consortium projects and IF or
ERC for example If there are differences it would be best if the EC provide examples
for all the type of calls
7 Explain DMP review practices
bull Endorse the internal assessment framework to ensure consistent use
bull Continue to provide internal training on reviewing DMPs in collaboration with
FOSTER Plus and other relevant groups
bull Develop circulate review guidelines and FAQs on practical implementation
bull Make a public statement on how DMPs are being reviewed ideally releasing the
assessment framework at the same time
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 26
Activities that may help
bull Science Europe Domain Data Protocols (DDPs)
bull Collections of example DMPs eg DCC RIOjournal Zenodo OpenAIRE
bull Existing costs guides eg LCRDM resource amp Wellcome guidance
bull Integrating registries into tools like DMPonline
bull RDA Working Group on Common standards for DMPs
bull Further support from FAIR Data EG OpenAIRE and others
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 27
What can you do
bull Share your DMP
ndash Publish in RIO - httpsriojournalcom
ndash Deposit in Zenodo - httpszenodoorg
ndash Add to DCC list - wwwdccacukshare-DMPs
bull Continue to provide feedback on the pilot and what works for you (or not)
bull Collaboration across research and support communities to develop your approach
bull Work with wider initiatives eg NOADs and international groups like RDA
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 28
Conclusions
Although there are several recommendations to the EC feedback was positive
bull Many found the process of developing a DMP a positive experience
bull Over half agree that the template was very useful
bull 19 of 68 stated they encountered no issues in following the EC guidelines
The EC has already iterated its open data guidelines and actively seeks input to
inform future policy developments
Further updates are likely The FAIR Data EG is to advise on future revisions of the
DMP template including the development of additional discipline specific guidance
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 29
Where to find out more
All the survey materials are on Zenodo
DOI 105281zenodo1120245
httpszenodoorgrecord1120245
bull Survey report
bull Raw data
bull Analysed dataset
bull Infographic
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 30
Acknowledgments
Marjan Grootveld DANS
Emilie Hermans UGent
Eliane Fankhauser DANS
2 Revise the DMP template structure
bull Regroup questions according to key activities and order in a more logical fashion
bull Identify which questions should be answered when
bull Where possible indicate secondary questions that can be skipped if not relevant
bull Include more yesno questions dropdown options or API integrations
bull Identify questions that will support evaluation and formulate them in a structured
way to enable automated compliance checks in future
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 21
3 Simplify DMP content amp terminology
bull Simplify the terminology used where possible
bull Provide a glossary of terms to assist researchers
bull Offer example answers particularly for questions with more technical terms
bull Seek to shorten the number of questions being asked
bull Provide some hierarchy or routing to the structuring of the questions
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 22
4 Discipline guidelines amp example answers
bull Provide discipline-specific guidelines
bull Offer example answers based on good practice in each domain
bull Give dropdown options or ranges pertinent to each field
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 23
We suggest that the EC builds on existing work and
collaborates with domain data centres and discipline-
specific groups such as learned societies
5 Publish DMPs and collate examples
bull Encourage projects to publish their DMPs
bull Offer a DMP registry service
bull Provide a library of lsquoapprovedrsquo DMPs representing
the range of funded research
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 24
Build on projectsrsquo existing willingness to publish and
work with external reviewers e-Infrastructure projects
and other groups eg LIBER to help approve examples
6 Include RDM costs in grant applications
bull Raise a few RDM questions alerts at the grant proposal stage
bull Provide worked examples that demonstrate what to include as RDM costs and how
bull Brief reviewers on eligible and expected costs
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 25
Clarification of what is an eligible cost regarding RDM is urgently needed for researchers
and also for the RDM support teams at the universities For example
bull If a project needs to buy extra storage from the own institution is that cost eligible
Or only external storage systems are eligible
bull Database curatorsadmins could be financed by EC projects
bull Are licenses for Electronic lab Notebooks (ELNs) for experimental data documentation
eligible costs
bull Are there differences in RDM eligible costs between consortium projects and IF or
ERC for example If there are differences it would be best if the EC provide examples
for all the type of calls
7 Explain DMP review practices
bull Endorse the internal assessment framework to ensure consistent use
bull Continue to provide internal training on reviewing DMPs in collaboration with
FOSTER Plus and other relevant groups
bull Develop circulate review guidelines and FAQs on practical implementation
bull Make a public statement on how DMPs are being reviewed ideally releasing the
assessment framework at the same time
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 26
Activities that may help
bull Science Europe Domain Data Protocols (DDPs)
bull Collections of example DMPs eg DCC RIOjournal Zenodo OpenAIRE
bull Existing costs guides eg LCRDM resource amp Wellcome guidance
bull Integrating registries into tools like DMPonline
bull RDA Working Group on Common standards for DMPs
bull Further support from FAIR Data EG OpenAIRE and others
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 27
What can you do
bull Share your DMP
ndash Publish in RIO - httpsriojournalcom
ndash Deposit in Zenodo - httpszenodoorg
ndash Add to DCC list - wwwdccacukshare-DMPs
bull Continue to provide feedback on the pilot and what works for you (or not)
bull Collaboration across research and support communities to develop your approach
bull Work with wider initiatives eg NOADs and international groups like RDA
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 28
Conclusions
Although there are several recommendations to the EC feedback was positive
bull Many found the process of developing a DMP a positive experience
bull Over half agree that the template was very useful
bull 19 of 68 stated they encountered no issues in following the EC guidelines
The EC has already iterated its open data guidelines and actively seeks input to
inform future policy developments
Further updates are likely The FAIR Data EG is to advise on future revisions of the
DMP template including the development of additional discipline specific guidance
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 29
Where to find out more
All the survey materials are on Zenodo
DOI 105281zenodo1120245
httpszenodoorgrecord1120245
bull Survey report
bull Raw data
bull Analysed dataset
bull Infographic
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 30
Acknowledgments
Marjan Grootveld DANS
Emilie Hermans UGent
Eliane Fankhauser DANS
3 Simplify DMP content amp terminology
bull Simplify the terminology used where possible
bull Provide a glossary of terms to assist researchers
bull Offer example answers particularly for questions with more technical terms
bull Seek to shorten the number of questions being asked
bull Provide some hierarchy or routing to the structuring of the questions
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 22
4 Discipline guidelines amp example answers
bull Provide discipline-specific guidelines
bull Offer example answers based on good practice in each domain
bull Give dropdown options or ranges pertinent to each field
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 23
We suggest that the EC builds on existing work and
collaborates with domain data centres and discipline-
specific groups such as learned societies
5 Publish DMPs and collate examples
bull Encourage projects to publish their DMPs
bull Offer a DMP registry service
bull Provide a library of lsquoapprovedrsquo DMPs representing
the range of funded research
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 24
Build on projectsrsquo existing willingness to publish and
work with external reviewers e-Infrastructure projects
and other groups eg LIBER to help approve examples
6 Include RDM costs in grant applications
bull Raise a few RDM questions alerts at the grant proposal stage
bull Provide worked examples that demonstrate what to include as RDM costs and how
bull Brief reviewers on eligible and expected costs
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 25
Clarification of what is an eligible cost regarding RDM is urgently needed for researchers
and also for the RDM support teams at the universities For example
bull If a project needs to buy extra storage from the own institution is that cost eligible
Or only external storage systems are eligible
bull Database curatorsadmins could be financed by EC projects
bull Are licenses for Electronic lab Notebooks (ELNs) for experimental data documentation
eligible costs
bull Are there differences in RDM eligible costs between consortium projects and IF or
ERC for example If there are differences it would be best if the EC provide examples
for all the type of calls
7 Explain DMP review practices
bull Endorse the internal assessment framework to ensure consistent use
bull Continue to provide internal training on reviewing DMPs in collaboration with
FOSTER Plus and other relevant groups
bull Develop circulate review guidelines and FAQs on practical implementation
bull Make a public statement on how DMPs are being reviewed ideally releasing the
assessment framework at the same time
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 26
Activities that may help
bull Science Europe Domain Data Protocols (DDPs)
bull Collections of example DMPs eg DCC RIOjournal Zenodo OpenAIRE
bull Existing costs guides eg LCRDM resource amp Wellcome guidance
bull Integrating registries into tools like DMPonline
bull RDA Working Group on Common standards for DMPs
bull Further support from FAIR Data EG OpenAIRE and others
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 27
What can you do
bull Share your DMP
ndash Publish in RIO - httpsriojournalcom
ndash Deposit in Zenodo - httpszenodoorg
ndash Add to DCC list - wwwdccacukshare-DMPs
bull Continue to provide feedback on the pilot and what works for you (or not)
bull Collaboration across research and support communities to develop your approach
bull Work with wider initiatives eg NOADs and international groups like RDA
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 28
Conclusions
Although there are several recommendations to the EC feedback was positive
bull Many found the process of developing a DMP a positive experience
bull Over half agree that the template was very useful
bull 19 of 68 stated they encountered no issues in following the EC guidelines
The EC has already iterated its open data guidelines and actively seeks input to
inform future policy developments
Further updates are likely The FAIR Data EG is to advise on future revisions of the
DMP template including the development of additional discipline specific guidance
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 29
Where to find out more
All the survey materials are on Zenodo
DOI 105281zenodo1120245
httpszenodoorgrecord1120245
bull Survey report
bull Raw data
bull Analysed dataset
bull Infographic
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 30
Acknowledgments
Marjan Grootveld DANS
Emilie Hermans UGent
Eliane Fankhauser DANS
4 Discipline guidelines amp example answers
bull Provide discipline-specific guidelines
bull Offer example answers based on good practice in each domain
bull Give dropdown options or ranges pertinent to each field
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 23
We suggest that the EC builds on existing work and
collaborates with domain data centres and discipline-
specific groups such as learned societies
5 Publish DMPs and collate examples
bull Encourage projects to publish their DMPs
bull Offer a DMP registry service
bull Provide a library of lsquoapprovedrsquo DMPs representing
the range of funded research
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 24
Build on projectsrsquo existing willingness to publish and
work with external reviewers e-Infrastructure projects
and other groups eg LIBER to help approve examples
6 Include RDM costs in grant applications
bull Raise a few RDM questions alerts at the grant proposal stage
bull Provide worked examples that demonstrate what to include as RDM costs and how
bull Brief reviewers on eligible and expected costs
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 25
Clarification of what is an eligible cost regarding RDM is urgently needed for researchers
and also for the RDM support teams at the universities For example
bull If a project needs to buy extra storage from the own institution is that cost eligible
Or only external storage systems are eligible
bull Database curatorsadmins could be financed by EC projects
bull Are licenses for Electronic lab Notebooks (ELNs) for experimental data documentation
eligible costs
bull Are there differences in RDM eligible costs between consortium projects and IF or
ERC for example If there are differences it would be best if the EC provide examples
for all the type of calls
7 Explain DMP review practices
bull Endorse the internal assessment framework to ensure consistent use
bull Continue to provide internal training on reviewing DMPs in collaboration with
FOSTER Plus and other relevant groups
bull Develop circulate review guidelines and FAQs on practical implementation
bull Make a public statement on how DMPs are being reviewed ideally releasing the
assessment framework at the same time
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 26
Activities that may help
bull Science Europe Domain Data Protocols (DDPs)
bull Collections of example DMPs eg DCC RIOjournal Zenodo OpenAIRE
bull Existing costs guides eg LCRDM resource amp Wellcome guidance
bull Integrating registries into tools like DMPonline
bull RDA Working Group on Common standards for DMPs
bull Further support from FAIR Data EG OpenAIRE and others
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 27
What can you do
bull Share your DMP
ndash Publish in RIO - httpsriojournalcom
ndash Deposit in Zenodo - httpszenodoorg
ndash Add to DCC list - wwwdccacukshare-DMPs
bull Continue to provide feedback on the pilot and what works for you (or not)
bull Collaboration across research and support communities to develop your approach
bull Work with wider initiatives eg NOADs and international groups like RDA
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 28
Conclusions
Although there are several recommendations to the EC feedback was positive
bull Many found the process of developing a DMP a positive experience
bull Over half agree that the template was very useful
bull 19 of 68 stated they encountered no issues in following the EC guidelines
The EC has already iterated its open data guidelines and actively seeks input to
inform future policy developments
Further updates are likely The FAIR Data EG is to advise on future revisions of the
DMP template including the development of additional discipline specific guidance
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 29
Where to find out more
All the survey materials are on Zenodo
DOI 105281zenodo1120245
httpszenodoorgrecord1120245
bull Survey report
bull Raw data
bull Analysed dataset
bull Infographic
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 30
Acknowledgments
Marjan Grootveld DANS
Emilie Hermans UGent
Eliane Fankhauser DANS
5 Publish DMPs and collate examples
bull Encourage projects to publish their DMPs
bull Offer a DMP registry service
bull Provide a library of lsquoapprovedrsquo DMPs representing
the range of funded research
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 24
Build on projectsrsquo existing willingness to publish and
work with external reviewers e-Infrastructure projects
and other groups eg LIBER to help approve examples
6 Include RDM costs in grant applications
bull Raise a few RDM questions alerts at the grant proposal stage
bull Provide worked examples that demonstrate what to include as RDM costs and how
bull Brief reviewers on eligible and expected costs
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 25
Clarification of what is an eligible cost regarding RDM is urgently needed for researchers
and also for the RDM support teams at the universities For example
bull If a project needs to buy extra storage from the own institution is that cost eligible
Or only external storage systems are eligible
bull Database curatorsadmins could be financed by EC projects
bull Are licenses for Electronic lab Notebooks (ELNs) for experimental data documentation
eligible costs
bull Are there differences in RDM eligible costs between consortium projects and IF or
ERC for example If there are differences it would be best if the EC provide examples
for all the type of calls
7 Explain DMP review practices
bull Endorse the internal assessment framework to ensure consistent use
bull Continue to provide internal training on reviewing DMPs in collaboration with
FOSTER Plus and other relevant groups
bull Develop circulate review guidelines and FAQs on practical implementation
bull Make a public statement on how DMPs are being reviewed ideally releasing the
assessment framework at the same time
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 26
Activities that may help
bull Science Europe Domain Data Protocols (DDPs)
bull Collections of example DMPs eg DCC RIOjournal Zenodo OpenAIRE
bull Existing costs guides eg LCRDM resource amp Wellcome guidance
bull Integrating registries into tools like DMPonline
bull RDA Working Group on Common standards for DMPs
bull Further support from FAIR Data EG OpenAIRE and others
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 27
What can you do
bull Share your DMP
ndash Publish in RIO - httpsriojournalcom
ndash Deposit in Zenodo - httpszenodoorg
ndash Add to DCC list - wwwdccacukshare-DMPs
bull Continue to provide feedback on the pilot and what works for you (or not)
bull Collaboration across research and support communities to develop your approach
bull Work with wider initiatives eg NOADs and international groups like RDA
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 28
Conclusions
Although there are several recommendations to the EC feedback was positive
bull Many found the process of developing a DMP a positive experience
bull Over half agree that the template was very useful
bull 19 of 68 stated they encountered no issues in following the EC guidelines
The EC has already iterated its open data guidelines and actively seeks input to
inform future policy developments
Further updates are likely The FAIR Data EG is to advise on future revisions of the
DMP template including the development of additional discipline specific guidance
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 29
Where to find out more
All the survey materials are on Zenodo
DOI 105281zenodo1120245
httpszenodoorgrecord1120245
bull Survey report
bull Raw data
bull Analysed dataset
bull Infographic
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 30
Acknowledgments
Marjan Grootveld DANS
Emilie Hermans UGent
Eliane Fankhauser DANS
6 Include RDM costs in grant applications
bull Raise a few RDM questions alerts at the grant proposal stage
bull Provide worked examples that demonstrate what to include as RDM costs and how
bull Brief reviewers on eligible and expected costs
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 25
Clarification of what is an eligible cost regarding RDM is urgently needed for researchers
and also for the RDM support teams at the universities For example
bull If a project needs to buy extra storage from the own institution is that cost eligible
Or only external storage systems are eligible
bull Database curatorsadmins could be financed by EC projects
bull Are licenses for Electronic lab Notebooks (ELNs) for experimental data documentation
eligible costs
bull Are there differences in RDM eligible costs between consortium projects and IF or
ERC for example If there are differences it would be best if the EC provide examples
for all the type of calls
7 Explain DMP review practices
bull Endorse the internal assessment framework to ensure consistent use
bull Continue to provide internal training on reviewing DMPs in collaboration with
FOSTER Plus and other relevant groups
bull Develop circulate review guidelines and FAQs on practical implementation
bull Make a public statement on how DMPs are being reviewed ideally releasing the
assessment framework at the same time
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 26
Activities that may help
bull Science Europe Domain Data Protocols (DDPs)
bull Collections of example DMPs eg DCC RIOjournal Zenodo OpenAIRE
bull Existing costs guides eg LCRDM resource amp Wellcome guidance
bull Integrating registries into tools like DMPonline
bull RDA Working Group on Common standards for DMPs
bull Further support from FAIR Data EG OpenAIRE and others
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 27
What can you do
bull Share your DMP
ndash Publish in RIO - httpsriojournalcom
ndash Deposit in Zenodo - httpszenodoorg
ndash Add to DCC list - wwwdccacukshare-DMPs
bull Continue to provide feedback on the pilot and what works for you (or not)
bull Collaboration across research and support communities to develop your approach
bull Work with wider initiatives eg NOADs and international groups like RDA
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 28
Conclusions
Although there are several recommendations to the EC feedback was positive
bull Many found the process of developing a DMP a positive experience
bull Over half agree that the template was very useful
bull 19 of 68 stated they encountered no issues in following the EC guidelines
The EC has already iterated its open data guidelines and actively seeks input to
inform future policy developments
Further updates are likely The FAIR Data EG is to advise on future revisions of the
DMP template including the development of additional discipline specific guidance
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 29
Where to find out more
All the survey materials are on Zenodo
DOI 105281zenodo1120245
httpszenodoorgrecord1120245
bull Survey report
bull Raw data
bull Analysed dataset
bull Infographic
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 30
Acknowledgments
Marjan Grootveld DANS
Emilie Hermans UGent
Eliane Fankhauser DANS
7 Explain DMP review practices
bull Endorse the internal assessment framework to ensure consistent use
bull Continue to provide internal training on reviewing DMPs in collaboration with
FOSTER Plus and other relevant groups
bull Develop circulate review guidelines and FAQs on practical implementation
bull Make a public statement on how DMPs are being reviewed ideally releasing the
assessment framework at the same time
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 26
Activities that may help
bull Science Europe Domain Data Protocols (DDPs)
bull Collections of example DMPs eg DCC RIOjournal Zenodo OpenAIRE
bull Existing costs guides eg LCRDM resource amp Wellcome guidance
bull Integrating registries into tools like DMPonline
bull RDA Working Group on Common standards for DMPs
bull Further support from FAIR Data EG OpenAIRE and others
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 27
What can you do
bull Share your DMP
ndash Publish in RIO - httpsriojournalcom
ndash Deposit in Zenodo - httpszenodoorg
ndash Add to DCC list - wwwdccacukshare-DMPs
bull Continue to provide feedback on the pilot and what works for you (or not)
bull Collaboration across research and support communities to develop your approach
bull Work with wider initiatives eg NOADs and international groups like RDA
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 28
Conclusions
Although there are several recommendations to the EC feedback was positive
bull Many found the process of developing a DMP a positive experience
bull Over half agree that the template was very useful
bull 19 of 68 stated they encountered no issues in following the EC guidelines
The EC has already iterated its open data guidelines and actively seeks input to
inform future policy developments
Further updates are likely The FAIR Data EG is to advise on future revisions of the
DMP template including the development of additional discipline specific guidance
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 29
Where to find out more
All the survey materials are on Zenodo
DOI 105281zenodo1120245
httpszenodoorgrecord1120245
bull Survey report
bull Raw data
bull Analysed dataset
bull Infographic
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 30
Acknowledgments
Marjan Grootveld DANS
Emilie Hermans UGent
Eliane Fankhauser DANS
Activities that may help
bull Science Europe Domain Data Protocols (DDPs)
bull Collections of example DMPs eg DCC RIOjournal Zenodo OpenAIRE
bull Existing costs guides eg LCRDM resource amp Wellcome guidance
bull Integrating registries into tools like DMPonline
bull RDA Working Group on Common standards for DMPs
bull Further support from FAIR Data EG OpenAIRE and others
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 27
What can you do
bull Share your DMP
ndash Publish in RIO - httpsriojournalcom
ndash Deposit in Zenodo - httpszenodoorg
ndash Add to DCC list - wwwdccacukshare-DMPs
bull Continue to provide feedback on the pilot and what works for you (or not)
bull Collaboration across research and support communities to develop your approach
bull Work with wider initiatives eg NOADs and international groups like RDA
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 28
Conclusions
Although there are several recommendations to the EC feedback was positive
bull Many found the process of developing a DMP a positive experience
bull Over half agree that the template was very useful
bull 19 of 68 stated they encountered no issues in following the EC guidelines
The EC has already iterated its open data guidelines and actively seeks input to
inform future policy developments
Further updates are likely The FAIR Data EG is to advise on future revisions of the
DMP template including the development of additional discipline specific guidance
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 29
Where to find out more
All the survey materials are on Zenodo
DOI 105281zenodo1120245
httpszenodoorgrecord1120245
bull Survey report
bull Raw data
bull Analysed dataset
bull Infographic
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 30
Acknowledgments
Marjan Grootveld DANS
Emilie Hermans UGent
Eliane Fankhauser DANS
What can you do
bull Share your DMP
ndash Publish in RIO - httpsriojournalcom
ndash Deposit in Zenodo - httpszenodoorg
ndash Add to DCC list - wwwdccacukshare-DMPs
bull Continue to provide feedback on the pilot and what works for you (or not)
bull Collaboration across research and support communities to develop your approach
bull Work with wider initiatives eg NOADs and international groups like RDA
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 28
Conclusions
Although there are several recommendations to the EC feedback was positive
bull Many found the process of developing a DMP a positive experience
bull Over half agree that the template was very useful
bull 19 of 68 stated they encountered no issues in following the EC guidelines
The EC has already iterated its open data guidelines and actively seeks input to
inform future policy developments
Further updates are likely The FAIR Data EG is to advise on future revisions of the
DMP template including the development of additional discipline specific guidance
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 29
Where to find out more
All the survey materials are on Zenodo
DOI 105281zenodo1120245
httpszenodoorgrecord1120245
bull Survey report
bull Raw data
bull Analysed dataset
bull Infographic
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 30
Acknowledgments
Marjan Grootveld DANS
Emilie Hermans UGent
Eliane Fankhauser DANS
Conclusions
Although there are several recommendations to the EC feedback was positive
bull Many found the process of developing a DMP a positive experience
bull Over half agree that the template was very useful
bull 19 of 68 stated they encountered no issues in following the EC guidelines
The EC has already iterated its open data guidelines and actively seeks input to
inform future policy developments
Further updates are likely The FAIR Data EG is to advise on future revisions of the
DMP template including the development of additional discipline specific guidance
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 29
Where to find out more
All the survey materials are on Zenodo
DOI 105281zenodo1120245
httpszenodoorgrecord1120245
bull Survey report
bull Raw data
bull Analysed dataset
bull Infographic
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 30
Acknowledgments
Marjan Grootveld DANS
Emilie Hermans UGent
Eliane Fankhauser DANS
Where to find out more
All the survey materials are on Zenodo
DOI 105281zenodo1120245
httpszenodoorgrecord1120245
bull Survey report
bull Raw data
bull Analysed dataset
bull Infographic
OpenAIRE amp FAIR Data Expert Group webinar 11th January 2018 httpswwwopenaireeueventseventdetail529 30
Acknowledgments
Marjan Grootveld DANS
Emilie Hermans UGent
Eliane Fankhauser DANS