1
Add new battery electric vehicles for poorly frequented lines where electrification does not pay off! •A suitable battery adds 30% to the mass of a car but only 10% to the mass of a train •A suitable battery adds 50% to the price of a car but only 15% to the price of a train •Including the battery costs in the electricity price would triple the electricity price •Yet, the energy cost would still be lower compared to a diesel railcar! •Not a new idea, by the way: Is railway transportation really energy efficient? And could it still be further improved? This diesel-hydraulic regional train consumes 1.7 litres of diesel fuel per km Fuel cost: 0.9 cents per km and seat! This electric long-distance train consumes 17 kWh of electricity per km Electricity cost: 0.2 cents per km and seat This diesel-electric express train causes 1,800 € of fuel cost for one single trip from Berlin to Copenhagen, so some 15 to 50 seats (out of 195) have to be occupied alone for recovering the fuel cost! 0,0MW 1,1MW 2,2MW 3,3MW 4,4MW 5,5MW 6,6MW 0kW 11kW 22kW 33kW 44kW 55kW 66kW 0km/h 50km /h 100km /h 150km /h 200km /h P (train) P (car) v Pow er requirem entcarand IC train P (car) P (IC train) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 0km 1km 2km 3km 4km 5km 6km 7km 8km v / v m ax s A cceleration process carand IC train 0 … 200 km /h Caracceleration v/vm ax IC train (10 carriages) v/vm ax 0km/h 50km /h 100km /h 150km /h 200km /h 250km /h 0km 8km 16km 24km 32km v s IC E 2 high speed train ofD B 's 402 series Train rolls Train brakes C arrolling out 0,0MW 1,0MW 2,0MW 3,0MW 4,0MW 5,0MW 6,0MW 7,0MW 8,0MW 0kN 50kN 100kN 150kN 200kN 250kN 0km/h 100km /h 200km /h 300km/h P F v IC E3 high speed railcar ofD B 's 403 series R equired force Available force Required power Available power What to do about it? There are three action areas: A car uses 100% of its engine power to run at maximum speed A train uses 33% of its locomotive power to run at maximum speed A car accelerates faster than a train? Well, initially yes, but somewhat later on... A car rolls 3.5 km disengaged A train has not even lost half of its speed after 32 km! Force and power of a locomotive – availability and requirement for running at constant speed in a flat area Support further electrification where not yet in place! •Unfortunately a combustion engine that can suck up fumes and convert them back into fuel and fresh air during braking has not yet been invented •A diesel engine in a railway vehicle spends >90% of its operating time idling •The nature of a diesel engine is pretty well suited for driving a car •The nature of a diesel engine matches the physics of a railway vehicle quite poorly •Electric drives are optimal in either case, hence there is much more improvement potential on the rail than on the road! Improve electrified transportation where already in place! A regional train serving the 160 km from Aachen to Dortmund with 22 stops reaches a maximum speed of 140 km/h •All correlated friction losses sum up to an energy requirement of 800 kWh •All acceleration related energy demand piles up to 1600 kWh So 50% of energy could be fed back, but only 10% is actually recovered! Hence: •Replace old locomotives: 10% → 20% •Improve brake management 20% → 50% •Replace locomotive hauled trains with railcars (dispersed drives) → >50% www.slideshare.net/LeonardoENERGYDeutschland/how-energy-efficient-really-is- railway-transportation Two times yes! While everybody speaks about the electric car, the real potential lies on the rail! Stefan Fassbinder, Deutsches Kupferinstitut, Düsseldorf / European Copper Institute, Brussels www.kupferinstitut. de www.leonardo- energy.org http://leonardo- web.org/de

Railway efficiency poster

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Poster exhibited at www.otti.de/pdf/sgm3515.pdf

Citation preview

Page 1: Railway efficiency poster

Add new battery electric vehicles for poorly frequented lines where

electrification does not pay off!

• A suitable battery adds 30% to the mass of a car but only 10% to the mass of a train

• A suitable battery adds 50% to the price of a car but only 15% to the price of a train

• Including the battery costs in the electricity price would triple the electricity price

• Yet, the energy cost would still be lower compared to a diesel railcar!

• Not a new idea, by the way:

it did work even with old heavy lead batteries from 1955 to 1995!

Is railway transportation really energy efficient?And could it still be further improved?

This diesel-hydraulic regional train consumes 1.7 litres of diesel fuel per km

Fuel cost: 0.9 cents per km and seat!

This electric long-distance train consumes17 kWh of electricity per km

Electricity cost: 0.2 cents per km and seat

This diesel-electric express train causes 1,800 € of fuel cost for one single trip from

Berlin to Copenhagen, so some 15 to 50 seats (out of 195) have to be occupied

alone for recovering the fuel cost!

0,0MW

1,1MW

2,2MW

3,3MW

4,4MW

5,5MW

6,6MW

0kW

11kW

22kW

33kW

44kW

55kW

66kW

0km/h 50km/h 100km/h 150km/h 200km/h

P(t

rain

)

P(c

ar)

v

Power requirement car and IC train

P (car)

P (IC train)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0km 1km 2km 3km 4km 5km 6km 7km 8km

v/v m

ax

s

Acceleration processcar and IC train0 … 200 km/h

Car acceleration v/vmax

IC train (10 carriages) v/vmax

0km/h

50km/h

100km/h

150km/h

200km/h

250km/h

0km 8km 16km 24km 32km

v

s

ICE 2 high speed train of DB's 402 series

Train rollsTrain brakesCar rolling out

0,0MW

1,0MW

2,0MW

3,0MW

4,0MW

5,0MW

6,0MW

7,0MW

8,0MW

0kN

50kN

100kN

150kN

200kN

250kN

0km/h 100km/h 200km/h 300km/h

P

F

v

ICE3 high speed railcarof DB's 403 series

Required forceAvailable forceRequired powerAvailable power

What to do about it? There are three action areas:

A car uses 100% of its engine power to run at maximum speed

A train uses 33% of its locomotive power to run at maximum speed

A car accelerates faster than a train?

Well, initially yes, but somewhat later on...

A car rolls 3.5 km disengaged

A train has not even lost half of its speed after 32 km!

Force and power of a locomotive – availability and requirement for running at constant speed in a

flat area

Support further electrification where not yet in place!

• Unfortunately a combustion engine that can suck up fumes and convert them back into fuel and fresh air during braking has not yet been invented

• A diesel engine in a railway vehicle spends >90% of its operating time idling

• The nature of a diesel engine is pretty well suited for driving a car

• The nature of a diesel engine matches the physics of a railway vehicle quite poorly

• Electric drives are optimal in either case, hence there is much more improvement potential on the rail than on the road!

Improve electrified transportation where already in place!

A regional train serving the 160 km from Aachen to Dortmund with 22 stops reaches a maximum speed of 140 km/h

• All correlated friction losses sum up to an energy requirement of 800 kWh

• All acceleration related energy demand piles up to 1600 kWh

So 50% of energy could be fed back, but only 10% is actually recovered! Hence:

• Replace old locomotives: 10% → 20%

• Improve brake management 20% → 50%

• Replace locomotive hauled trains with railcars (dispersed drives) → >50%

www.slideshare.net/LeonardoENERGYDeutschland/how-energy-efficient-really-is-railway-transportation

Two times yes! While everybody speaks about the electric car, the real potential lies on the rail!

Stefan Fassbinder, Deutsches Kupferinstitut, Düsseldorf / European Copper Institute, Brussels

www.kupferinstitut.de www.leonardo-energy.org http://leonardo-web.org/de