Upload
mrlaytonj
View
146
Download
5
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Running: urban life and the ‘active’ use of public space
By Jack Layton
• “There are few more delightful urban pleasures than walking along the south bank of the [River] Seine … and somehow luxurious to follow the flow of joggers, cyclists and idle wanderers” (Hollis, 2013: 289)
• “If only these deprived children can be gotten off the street into parks and playgrounds with equipment on which to exercise, space in which to run, grass to lift their souls!” (Jacobs, 1961: 74)
• “The enthusiasm for running, jogging, bicycling and other active sports has drawn many persons into public spaces … those involved are out in the public sphere and open to public encounters” (Carr, et al. 1993: 41)
Intro
• What it means to live in the city
- Lefebvre and the everyday
• Spatial turn- Lefebvre - Soja- Massey- Amin
• Mobilities turn- Cycling, skateboarding,
walking, parcour, yoga, dancing
RUNNING• Growth in popularity• Olympics• Magazines, blogs, forums,
events
Running moment + lack of academic study = perfect dissertation topic
Theoretical Backdrop
THE CITY• Simmell, Benjamin, Jacobs,
Sennett, Amin • Looking at the link between
diverse use of public space and citizenship
MOBILITIES• Lefebvre & the everyday• De Certeau, Urry, Borden, Middleton,
Spinney, Cook• How individuals experience the city differently
by being mobile
+ limitations of A-N-T
& the aspatial sociology of sport
• What does the individual experience in public space? Does being mobile affect how people perceive the city, society and themselves?
Structure
• The best way to go about exploring these issues is to use an archetypal runner as a straw man from which I can attach my main findings
- Accepted in public space- The self-sufficient (lonely) individual- Mechanized running
Method
• 4 weeks fieldwork• 10 in depth interviews (recorded)• 30 interviews on the move (notes taken after)• 100 miles of participant observation (notes taken after)• 4 different running groups. Numbers ranging from 12 – 200 • Literature review of contemporary running culture• Participatory ethnography
-------
• Transcribing and coding interviews• Cross referenced with field diary • Pick out key themes, topics, discourses that came out
Accepted citizen
Expectations- The conventional use of public
space- Feeling good about using
public parks and facilities- Playing up to the idea of the
healthy citizen - London as a good city for
running
Findingsa) Discourses of reclaiming the
streetsb) Ideas of escapism and
freedomc) Negotiation with other users
-------= situated multiplicity
Not about adhering to norms or being obedient, but about making the city work for the individual. Need to
utilise Lefebvre’s (1991) spatial triad
Lonely individual
Sense of belonging in the city was complex and crossed scales. Cities are not made up of isolated individuals but is
a ‘community of communities’ (Amin, 2007), where the shared experience of space is significant
Expectations- The loneliness of the long
distance runner- Self motivation and self
satisfaction with achievement- Individualization of risk in
contemporary cities- Nike: ‘Just Do It’
Findings- Intricate social relationsa) Community and friendships
through co-production of space
b) Networked communities, shared imagination and spectacle of marathon
c) Virtual communities------= identity politics
Mechanized body
Expectations- Modernization and the
rationalization of space and time
- Bale 2004 on running cultures - Need to run x distance in y
time to achieve z goal- With various technologies it is
possible to treat outside like a treadmill.
- Optimising the body to achieve the best performance
Findings- Complex relationship with
technology - GPS facilitated communication
with self and others- Sense of safety and freedom
in the city-----= The assemblage of technology
and bodies in the city is far more complex than the mechanization of life.
We need a much more nuanced understanding of how humans and technology are assembled in space and the affective relationships that individuals build with technology.
Concs (1)
• What does the individual experience in public space? Does being mobile affect how people perceive the city, society and themselves?
• Public space is not universally experienced but a space of multiple meanings being negotiated by different bodies.
• However the use of public space is important. It allows users to reinterpret the representations of space with their own experiences and meanings
• This production of space occurs in relation to other people, both through the ‘exclusion’ and ‘marginalization’ of some, but through co-construction with others. There is a social dynamic at play
• For runners there is also a public-ness to their identity and the recognition of other ‘runners’ using public space in a similar way.
Concs (2)
Reworking their situation• In each of the themes discussed we see how runners have
reworked their situation to handle the ‘urban condition’.
• People use running as a way of reworking space to fit their needs -> (Lefebvre, 1991)
• as a way of building social relations in the city -> (Sennett, 2012)• Using technology in a more humanistic way
• Running can be used as both a lens to understand what it means to live in the city
• But also as a strategy to cope in urban life, as people ‘active’-ly shape their situation.
Tips for 2nd (&1st) years
• Do something you enjoy• Use social media• Write a blog (www.runners-ramblings.tumblr.com) • People like to talk about their interests• Plan the first few days in the field• Don’t be afraid of theory! • Read some dissertations• Don’t worry about specific questions yet