Upload
andrew-sharpe
View
391
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Presentation on European Commission Recommendation on regulation of next generation access networks - 26 October 2010
Citation preview
COMPETITION & REGULATORY GROUP
Charles Russell LLP5 Fleet PlaceLondonEC4M 7RDwww.charlesrussell.co.uk
Charles Russell LLP Floor 31, World Trade CentreWest TowerIs Al Kabeer AvenuePO Box 31249 ManamaKingdom of Bahrainwww.charlesrussell.bh
Next Generation Access Networks
Andrew SharpeCompetition Law & Regulation in the Telecoms,
Internet & Broadcasting Sectors 2010
Next Generation Access Networks
• Key elements from the NGA guidelines• Multiple or mono-fibre?• Is the Commission’s policy technology
neutral?• Implementation of equivalence• Practical legal challenges in moving
towards the next generation of fixed and mobile networks
• State aid
© Draka Holding N.V. (permission being sought)
Next Generation Access Networks
NGA Guidelines
• Commission Recommendation 2010/572/EU– Commission Recommendation of 20
September 2010 on regulated access to Next Generation Access Networks (NGA)
– OJ L 251/35 dated 25.9.2010– only 14 pages = “simples”
• Commission Staff Working Document C(2010) 6223– accompanies Recommendation
2010/572/EU– 60 pages = “that’s more like it”
• Definitions:
“Next generation access (NGA) networks” (NGAs) means wired access networks which consist wholly or in part of optical elements and which are capable of delivering broadband access services with enhanced characteristics (such as higher throughput) as compared to those provided over already existing copper networks. In most cases NGAs are the result of an upgrade of an already existing copper or co-axial access network”
NGA Guidelines
• Definitions:
“Next generation access (NGA) networks” (NGAs) means wired access networks which consist wholly or in part of optical elements and which are capable of delivering broadband access services with enhanced characteristics (such as higher throughput) as compared to those provided over already existing copper networks. In most cases NGAs are the result of an upgrade of an already existing copper or co-axial access network”
• Definitions:
“Next generation access (NGA) networks” (NGAs) means wired access networks which consist wholly or in part of optical elements and which are capable of delivering broadband access services with enhanced characteristics (such as higher throughput) as compared to those provided over already existing copper networks. In most cases NGAs are the result of an upgrade of an already existing copper or co-axial access network”
NGA Guidelines
• Definitions
“Metropolitan Point of Presence” (MPoP) means the point of interconnection between the access and core networks of the NGA operator. It is the equivalent to the Main Distribution Frame (MDF) in the case of the copper access network.
• Wired network access:
– twisted pairs(100 pair externalillustrated)
– co-axial cable(32 core externalillustrated)
– fibre optic (48 fibre,8 ribbon slottedexternal illustrated)
NGA Guidelines
NGA Guidelines
• FTTx
Fibre to the:
Node (Cabinet) Curb (Cabinet) Building (Basement)HomePremises
= FTTH or FTTB
Illustration © Riick under GFDL (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/)
NGA Guidelines
Illustration © Riick under GFDL (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/)
NGA Guidelines
Illustration © Riick under GFDL (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/)
NGA Guidelines
• Access to wholesale physical network infrastructure (Market 4)– Access to civil engineering infrastructure– Access to FTTH terminating segment– Unbundled access to FTTH fibre loop– Access where FTTN
NGA Guidelines
• Access to civil engineering infrastructure– If duct capacity, NRAs to mandate access– Access at cost-orientated prices– Reference offer in place 6 mths from
request– Encourage or, where national law permits,
oblige SMP operator to install “sufficient capacity for other operators”
– Establish database of available civil engineering facilities
NGA Guidelines
• Access to FTTH terminating segment– In addition to civil engineering access where
SMP operator deploys FTTH– Includes wiring inside buildings– NRAs to determine distribution point, taking
into account that DP “will need to host sufficient number of end-user connections to be commercially viable for the access seeker”
– Cost-orientated pricing– Encourage (or oblige) deployment of
multiple fibres in terminating segment
NGA Guidelines
• Unbundled access to FTTH fibre loop– Unless in particular geographical areas
where effective competition at downstream level, mandate unbundled access (with appropriate co-location and backhaul measures)
– Access point normally MPoP– Amend existing LLU reference offers within
6 mths after NRA mandate– Cost-orientated pricing, including risk
premium in cost of capital for “additional and quantifiable investment risk”
– NRAs to carry out margin-squeeze testing
NGA Guidelines
• Access where FTTN– Obligation of unbundled access to copper
sub-loop, with supplemental backhaul measures, including fibre and Ethernet backhaul
– Reference offer in place in 6 mths– Cost-orientated pricing
NGA Guidelines
• Wholesale broadband access(Market 5)– Access remedies maintained or amended– Wholesale broadband access over vDSL a
chain substitute to access over copper-only loops
– Access products available 6 mths before SMP operator or retail subsidiary markets NGA retail services
NGA Guidelines
• Don’t ignore the Commission Staff Working Document:– “the report… contains an analysis of the
content of the Recommendation, setting out in more detail the range of remedies available to national regulatory authorities and the way they could be applied in an NGA setting”
NGA Guidelines
• Rungs of the ladder of investment
• Commission’s Possible Policy Responses:
OPTION 1: Regulatory forbearance and a priori exclusion of remedies
OPTION 2: Imposition of full range of access and pricing remedies
OPTION 3: Imposition of access obligations adjusted for investment risk
NGA Guidelines
• OPTION 1: Regulatory forbearance and a priori exclusion of remedies– Only policy objective: investment in
networks– Regulatory holidays (to you and me), but
definition of markets difficult– Abandons cost-orientation?– [Unstated, but Case C-424/07 European
Commission v. Federal Republic of Germany]
• OPTION 2: Imposition of full range of access and pricing remedies– Essentially, current regime– Argues “all rungs of the ladder of investment
would have to be present in every conceivable regulatory situation, from duct access over unbundling to bitstream”
– Access remedies would be requested to be priced at very low levels (strict cost-orientation, no/little consideration of uncertainty or investment risk)
– Hostile to risk-sharing mechanisms
NGA Guidelines
• OPTION 3: Imposition of access obligations adjusted for investment risk– Access obligations appropriately adjusted
for investment risk, aimed at driving both competition and investment
– Any change?• See Article 8 Framework Directive 2002/21/EC• Any help/change after amendment by Better
Regulation Directive 2009/140/EC
Multiple or mono-fibre?
• Encourage (or where national law permits, oblige) deployment of multiple fibres
• Not clear upon what basis additional capacity to be valued/priced?
• Rationale?– Technological neutrality?– DWDM/optical switching?
Is the Commission’s policy technology neutral?
• Policy, as set out in Staff Working Document, is for technological neutrality
• In practice?– Why define any broadband market by
reference to transport medium (twisted pair, co-axial cable, optical fibre, radio)?
– Remedies based upon most practicable and efficient network access points
• Location and nature of access points always technology specific?
• Ethernet?
Implementation of equivalence
• Set out in Annex II of the Recommendation:– Principle of Equivalence– Information on Infrastructure and DPs– Ordering and provisioning– SLAs/Reference Offer– Functional separation “lite”?
Practical Legal Challenges
• Nothing new?• Major challenges:
– NGA/NGN pricing?– SLAs across whole network– NGA impact on net neutrality?– Cost-orientation for civil engineering assets
State aid
• Article 107(1) TFEU, cannot have state funded NGA networks
• Application of Article 107(3) where aid may be compatible with internal market
• Commission Guidelines for application of State aid rules to broadband networks (OJ C 235/7 30.9.2009)
• DG Comp list – http://ec.europa.eu/competition/sectors/
telecommunications/broadband_decisions.pdf
– Mostly Article 4(3) under Council Regulation 659/1999 for rural development (Art. 107(3)(a))
Next Generation Access Networks
“The point is ladies and gentlemen that greed, for lack of a better word, is good.”
Gordon Gekko, “Wall Street”
“The point is ladies and gentlemen that competition, for lack of a better word, is good.”
“The point is ladies and gentlemen that regulation, for lack of a better word, is good.”
Next Generation Access Networks
• NGAs in the UK?
Next Generation Access Networks
• NGAs in Lyydington, Rutland, UK
Andrew SharpeCharles Russell LLPTel: + 44 (0) 20 7203 5194
+973 17 133219Mobile:+ 44 (0) 77 1307 9516
+973 39 035451Email: [email protected]
andrewjsharpe
TMT_Lawyer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/andrewsharpe
CRITique at http://charlesrussell.wordpress.com
Offices in: London, Oxford, Cambridge, Cheltenham, Guildford, Geneva (Switzerland), Manama (Bahrain)This information has been prepared as a general guide only and does not constitute advice on any specific
matter. We recommend that you seek professional advice before taking action. No liability can be accepted by us for any action taken or not taken as a result of this information.
Charles Russell LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales, registered number OC311850, and is regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. Any reference to a partner in relation to Charles Russell LLP is to a member of Charles Russell LLP or an employee with equivalent standing and
qualifications. A list of members and of non-members who are described as partners, is available for inspection at the registered office, 5 Fleet Place, London EC4M 7RD.
www.charlesrussell.co.uk www.charlesrussell.bh