45
م ي ح ر ل ا ن م ح ر ل ه ا ل ل م ا س ب

Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

Page 2: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Prof. Dr. Mohamed Khairy MakledProfessor of Parasitology

Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University

Prof. Dr. Mohamed Al-Hussieny FayadProfessor of Parasitology

Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams UniversityProf. Dr. Abd-Al Magid Mohamed Kamal

Professor of Parasitology

Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams UniversityDr. Magid Mustafa Al-Sherbiny

Assistant Professor of ZoologyFaculty of Science, Cairo University

 Dr. Gihan Mustafa Tawfeek

Assistant Professor of ParasitologyFaculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University

Page 3: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

APPLICATION & ASSESSMENT OF

IMMUNOCHROMATOGRAPHIC STRIPS & DIPSTICKS IN

DIAGNOSIS OF SOME PARASITIC DISEASES

Page 4: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

INTRODUCTION  One of the most pronounced problems in controlling the

morbidity and mortality caused by different parasites is limited access to early, rapid and effective diagnosis in order to provide proper treatment (Tsang & Wilkins, 1991).

Different serological tests based on antibody detection are widely used but the need for special kits, the technical problems for the adequate preparation and reading of results and the time consuming incubation steps are several disadvantages of these tests. Dipstick format of Dot-ELISA and Immunochromatographic strips (ICS) are two simple immunodiagnostic tests that recently developed for diagnosis of parasitic diseases.

Page 5: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

The assay uses minute amounts of antigen dotted onto solid surface. After incubation with antigen-specific antibody and enzyme-conjugated anti-antibody, the addition of a chromogenic substrate causes the formation of a colored dot on the solid phase, which is visually read (Pappas, 1988)..

DIPSTICKS

Dipstick format of Dot-ELISA is a highly versatile solid-phase immunoassay for antibody or antigen detection.

Page 6: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

APPLICATIONS OF DIPSTICKS IN PARASITOLOGY

Dipstick assay detected IgG, IgM and IgA to E/S antigen of Toxoplasma gondii in patients’ sera (Yamamoto et al. 1998)

 

The dipstick was both sensitive in detecting kala-azar in sera from patients with confirmed infections and specific in excluding healthy geographically matched controls (Pappas, 1988).

Using the sandwich style of antigen detection, dipstick assay for detection of Taenia species coproantigens in the stool was developed (Allan, et al., 1992).

Dipsticks were used as a simplified antigen detection assay to detect Schistosome antigen in urine (Van Etten et al. 1994). This assay was modified to detect antibodies specific to Schistosoma species in serum (Al-Sherbiny, 1996).

Page 7: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

ICS Immunochromatographic assay is widely used for the

detection of various analytics such as hormones, antigens, antibodies, other proteins, and drugs.

The assay is performed on a nitrocellulose membrane strip and the result is determined by a visual read out of colored colloidal gold without using conjugates or substrates.

Physicians and medical technicians use these assays for rapid diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring of a variety of conditions and disorders, due to the simplicity of the procedures and the rapidity of the result (Shin, et al., 2001).

Page 8: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

APPLICATIONS OF ICS IN PARASITOLOGY

ICS was used successfully in the detection of Entamoeba histolytica antigens in the stool samples ( Bhaskar, et al., 1996).

1. ANTIGEN DETECTION ICS

ICS was developed as a rapid diagnostic test for Malaria based on an antigen capture (Shiff, et al., 1993).

For detection of Bancroftian filariasis, ICS was employed using specific polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies to Wuchereria bancrofti antigen (Bhumiratana, et al., 1999).

Page 9: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

2. ANTIBODY DETECTION ICS

 

Antibodies detection ICS was not optimized in diagnosis of parasitic infections, despite its’ successful application in diagnosis of bacterial infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Grobusch, et al., 1998).

Page 10: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

AIM OF THE WORK

Apply dipstick format of Dot-ELISA and Immunochromatographoic strips (ICS) as immunodiagnostic tests in the diagnosis of human schistosomiasis, hydatidosis, toxoplasmosis, and trichinosis using the crude antigen prepared for each of them.

Evaluate the dipstick assay and ICS in diagnosis of these diseases in comparison to the enzyme immmunoelectrotransfer blot (EITB) & FAST-ELISA

Apply and evaluate the dipstick assay in diagnosis of trichinosis in experimentally infected mice in comparison to EITB and ELISA.

Page 11: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

MATERIALS & METHODS

A. Clinical Study: Sera were collected from patients of hydatidosis,

schistosomiasis, toxoplasmosis & trichinosis in addition to sera of normal healthy individuals as control samples

B. Experimental Study: Experimental infection of mice with Trichinella

spiralis larvae and collection of sera were done. 

Page 12: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

 Group 1  Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Group 5

1a

Hydatidosis patients

3a

Toxoplasmosis Patients

4a

Trichinosis patients

1b Patients with

1.Toxoplasmosis

2. Trichinosis 3.Schistosomiasis

4. Amoebiasis

5. Fascioliasis.

(For EITB and FAST-

ELISA)

Schistosomiasis Patients

3bPatients with 1.Hydatidosis

2. Trichinosis 3.Schistosomiasis

4. Amoebiasis

5. Fascioliasis.

(For EITB and FAST-ELISA)

4bPatients with 1.Hydatidodid

2. Toxoplasmosis

3. Schistosomiasis

4. Amoebiasis

5. Fascioliasis.

(For EITB and FAST-ELISA)

Control Sera

 1c 1b + Patients with

1. Ascarisis

2. Cysticercosis

3. Alveolar Ech.

4. Onchocerciasis

5. Filariasis

(For dipsticks & ICS)

 3c 3b + Patients with

1. Ascarisis

2. Cysticercosis

3. Alveolar Ech.

4. Onchocerciasis

5. Filariasis

(For dipsticks &ICS)

4c4b + Patients with

1. Ascarisis

2. Cysticercosi

3. Alveolar Echin.

4. Onchocerciasis

5. Filariasis

(For dipsticks& ICS)

Page 13: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

For both studies the following were done:Preparation of

Crude HCF antigenCrude T. gondii tachyzoite antigen

Crude T.spiralis antigen[ MAMA & HAMA were supplied by ERDC]

Experimental StudyClinical Study

Evaluation of reactivity of these antigens to the collected Sera

EITB FAST-ELISA EITB ELISA

Dipsticks1. Preparation2. Assay

ICS1. Preparation2. Assay

Page 14: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1
Page 15: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

Reaction of Hydatidosis Patients, Normal Controls & Sera of other parasitic Diseases in EITB

Page 16: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

%

200 138 56 45-50 38 27.5 23.5 16.5 12

Crude HCF antigen (KDa)

Hydatidosis patients

P atients wuth otherparasitic diseases

Normal control

%positive reactions of sera of hydatidosis patients, patients with other parasitic infections and normal controls with different bands of crude HCF

antigen bands in EITB

Page 17: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100 %

po

sit

ive

Hydatidosispatients

Patients withother parasitic

diseases

Normal control

Groups

Reaction of sera of hydatidosis patients, patients with other parasitic diseases and normal controls to crude HCF antigen by FAST-ELISA

Page 18: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

Reactions of hydatidosis patients, normal controls and heterologous sera to crude HCF antigen in dipstick assay

Page 19: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

Reactions of hydatidosis patients sera and sera of patients with other parasitic diseases to crude HCF antigen in dipstick assay

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Groups

%positive

Page 20: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

ICS using crude HCF antigen tested in hydatidosis patients, normal control sera, PBS and D.water

Page 21: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

+ve -ve +ve -ve +ve -ve

Hydatid Control

EITB Dipsticks ELISA

 Tests

 Sensitivity

 Specificity

 Efficiency

Predictive value

+ve PV -ve PV

EITB 

 100%

 91.4%

 95.1%

 89.7%

 100%

 FAST ELISA 

 96.2%

 100%

 98.4%

 100%

 97.2%

 Dipsticks 

 100%  91.4%  95.1%  89.7%  100%

Page 22: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

Reactions of Schistosomiasis patient and normal control sera with

S.mansoni specific fraction in EITB

Reactions of Schistosomiasis patient and normal control sera with S.haematobium

specific fraction in EITB

Page 23: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

%

MAMA (30-32KDa) HAMA (23KDa)

Patients

control

% positive reactions of sera of schistosomiasis patients and normal controls with different bands of MAMA and

HAMA in EITB

Page 24: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

 

Groups 

Total number of tested sera

No. (%) PositiveMAMA-

FASTELISA

 

Schistosomiasis patients

 

  

30

  

29 (96.7)

 

Normal control 

 

10

 

0 (0)

Number and percentage of positive reactions by FAST ELISA using MAMA

Page 25: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

Reactions of Schistosomiasis patients and normal controls sera to S.mansoni Gp30 and S.haematobium Gp23 in dipsticks assay

Page 26: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

ICS using GP30 of S.mansoni

ICS using GP23 specific for S.haematobium

Page 27: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

 

Tests 

Sensitivity 

Specificity 

EfficiencyPredictive value (PV)

+ve PV -ve PV

 

EITB 

 96.7%

 100%

 97.5 %

 100%

 90.9%

 

FAST ELISA 

 96.7%

 100%

 97.5 %

 100%

 90.9%

 

Dipsticks 96.7%

 100%

 97.5 % 

 100%

 90.9% 

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

%

+ve -ve +ve -ve +ve -ve

Patients

Control

EITB Dipstick FAST-ELISA

Page 28: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

EITB analysis of antibody responses to crude tachyzoite antigen for sera from toxoplasmosis patient, controls, and sera of patients with other parasitic diseases

Page 29: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

%

30 23

KDa

Toxoplasmosis control

% positive reactions of sera of toxoplasmosis patients, patients with other parasitic infections and normal controls with different bands of

crude tachyzoite antigen

Page 30: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

%

Toxoplasmosis Patients with otherparasitic diseases

Normal control

Groups

% positive

Reaction of sera of toxoplasmosis patients, patients of other parasitic diseases and normal controls to crude tachyzoite antigen by FAST-

ELISA

Page 31: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

Reactions of toxoplasmosis patients’ sera, normal control and heterologous sera in dipstick assay

Page 32: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

ICS using crude tachyzoites antigen of T.gondii

Page 33: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

%

+ve -ve +ve -ve

EITB FAST ELISA

Patients

Control

Comparison between results of EITB, and FAST-ELISA in toxoplasmosis patients and controls

 Tests

 Sensitivity

 Specificity

 Efficiency

Predictive value

+ve PV -ve PV

 

EITB 100%

 100%

 100%

 100 %

 100%

 FAST ELISA

 95.5%

 94.3%

 94.7%

 91.3%

 97.1%

Page 34: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

Reaction of trichinosis patients, normal controls, and sera of different parasitic diseases in EITB

Page 35: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

%

87 52 45 40

KDa

Trichimosis

Controls

%positive reactions of sera of trichinosis patients and normal

controls with different bands of Trichinella antigen

Page 36: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

%

Trichinosis patients Patients w ith otherparasitic diseases

Normal control

Groups

Reaction of sera of trichinosis patients, patients of other parasitic diseases and normal controls to crude larval antigen of T.spiralis by

FAST-ELISA 

Page 37: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

Reactions of sera of trichinosis patients, normal controls, and heterologous sera to T.spiralis antigen in Dipstick

Page 38: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

%

Trichinosis patients Patients w ith otherparasitic infection

Normal control

Groups

% positive reactions of trichinosis patients’ sera, sera of patients with different parasitic diseases & normal control

in dipstick assay.

Page 39: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

ICS using the crude T.spiralis larval antigen

Page 40: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

 Tests

 Sensitivity

 Specificity

 Efficiency

Predictive value

+ve PV -ve PV

 EITB

 100%

 100%

 100%

 100%

 100%

 FAST ELISA

 85.7%

  85.7%

 85.7%

 54.5%

 96.8%

 Dipsticks

 100%

 100%

 100%

 100%

 100%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

+ve -ve +ve -ve +ve -ve

Trichinella (Human) Control

EITB Dipsticks ELISA

Page 41: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

Reactions of experimentally infected mice sera at different time interval post infection to Trichinella antigen by EITB and dipsticks

Page 42: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

Dipstick assay is valuable immunodiagnostic test for diagnosis of hydatidosis, schistosomiasis, human and experimental trichinsosis, with high sensitivity and almost high specificity.

 

Simple Economic

Very antigen conservative Very serum conservative

Doesn’t require any lab. Instruments

Field applicable

Positive test can be visually identified

(color precipitate)

Dipstick assay

Page 43: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

Can be used as a qualitative test to screen large numbers of samples or as a quantitative assay to determine endpoint titration of individual sera.

Dipstick assay

In schistosomiasis the dipstick assay has the advantage of the capability of speciation of two Schistosomes S. mansoni and S. haematobium on the same strip.

Further improvement may make the dipsticks assay suitable for wide scale use in field studies and in rural areas were equipped laboratories are not available.

Page 44: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1

Apply Dipstick assay for diagnosis of Hydatidosis, Schistosomiasis, and Trichinosis in field studies in endemic areas.

Apply Dipstick assay in diagnosis of Trichinosis in swine in slaughter houses in control programs

Develop ICS for diagnosis of hydatidosis, schistosomiasis, toxoplasmosis, and trichinosis using highly purified antigens and amplifying signals that hindered us in developing this test.

Page 45: Nehad m. sayed (ain shams)1