90

Mba2011

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Mba2011
Page 2: Mba2011

Emerging TechnologiesToday’s Students

2011 Leadership ConferenceJanuary 26-28, 2011 : San Francisco, CA

Veronica Diaz, PhDAssociate DirectorEDUCAUSE Learning Initiative

Page 3: Mba2011

DOWNLOAD ME!http://www.slideshare.net/drvdiaz/mba2011

Page 4: Mba2011

Agenda • The role of

emerging technologies in the learning experience

– Trends and challenges

• Student data

• Horizon Report

• Examples

Page 5: Mba2011

Click on the poll to vote

Page 6: Mba2011
Page 7: Mba2011

Trends = “why?”

Page 8: Mba2011

The abundance of resources and relationships made easily accessible via the Internet is increasingly challenging us to revisit our roles as educators in

sense-making, coaching, and credentialing.

Page 9: Mba2011

People expect to be able to work, learn, and study

whenever and wherever they want.

Page 10: Mba2011

The world of work is increasingly collaborative, encouraging reflection

about the way student projects are structured.

Page 11: Mba2011

The technologies we use are increasingly cloud-based, and our notions of IT

support are decentralized.

Page 12: Mba2011

ECAR Data = other “why?”

Page 13: Mba2011

Technology Ownership Trends

63%

47%

1%12%

46%

84%

63%

13%

20042010

DesktopComputer

LaptopComputer

Smartphone

PDA

InternetCapable

Handheld

Netbook

Page 14: Mba2011

Types of Computers Owned

Page 15: Mba2011

Ownership of Internet-Capable Handheld Devices

2009 2010

51%63%

12%

11%63%74%

OwnOwn

Plan toown

Plan toown

Page 16: Mba2011

2009 2010

15%27%

11%

15%8%

7%

Monthly or less

34% Total49% Total

Owners of Internet-capable handheld devices only.

Accessing Internet from Handheld Device

Page 17: Mba2011

Internet Activities from Handheld

Checkinfo

E-mail SNS Maps Bank,shop,etc.

Music Videos Games

77% 75%

63%59%

27%23% 20% 17%

85%82%

77%

69%

38%35%

30%26%

20092010

Owners of Internet-capable handheld devices only.

Page 18: Mba2011

Instant messaging

Clickers/SRS

Lecturepodcasts/videos

E-books/E-texts

Spreadsheets

CMS/LMS

Presentation

Library website

16%

17%

18%

24%

45%

66%

67%

70%

Core Technologies in Courses

Tools being used in a course during the quarter or semesterof the survey (February to April 2010)

Page 19: Mba2011

Study support

Blogs

Citation/bib tools

Web-based calendars

Video-sharing sites

Publisher sites

Review/opinion sites

SNSs

Wikis

GoogleDocs etc.

11%

12%

17%

17%

24%

26%

27%

29%

33%

36%

Web-based Technologies in Courses

%

Percent of userscollaborating withother students using the tool in a course

53%

31%

49%

23%

33%

17%

38%

Tools being used in a course during the quarter or semesterof the survey (February to April 2010)

Page 20: Mba2011

Instructors and IT in Courses

Use IT effectively in courses

Provide students with adequate training for course IT

Have adequate IT skills for course instruction

32%

47%

33%

21%

15%

18%

47%

38%

49%

Almost none or someAbout halfMost to almost all

Page 21: Mba2011

Student Info Lit Self-Assess

Page 22: Mba2011

Student Perceptions of IT in Courses

Page 23: Mba2011

At graduation, the IT I have used in my courses will have adequately prepared me for the workplace

Innovator Earlyadopter

Mainstreamadopter

Lateadopter

Laggard AllStudents

62%

54%

45%

34%29%

47%

Students who agree or strongly agree

Page 24: Mba2011

What do you think?

How are the trends manifesting themselves at your colleges?

How does the ECAR data compare with what you’re seeing locally?

Page 25: Mba2011

Cloud

MobilesE-Books

Page 26: Mba2011

Mobility

Page 27: Mba2011

Click on the poll to vote

Page 28: Mba2011

ELI 2010 Online Spring Focus Session

Mobile Learning 2.0: The Next Phase of

Innovation in Mobility

Page 29: Mba2011

Content Community

Collaboration

Page 30: Mba2011

Content Community

Collaboration

Page 31: Mba2011

Mobile technology is best suited for…

Page 32: Mba2011

Tapping into the PLE

Page 33: Mba2011

Content delivery is the low-hanging fruit

Page 34: Mba2011

Rapid growth in mobile applications and their

interoperability with other tools

Page 35: Mba2011

The new tool in the toolkit

Page 36: Mba2011

Challenge of ownership patterns

Page 37: Mba2011

Click on the poll to vote

Page 38: Mba2011

Mobility Examples

Page 39: Mba2011

University of Utah’s Anatomy App

More Info: http://www.unews.utah.edu/p/?r=092409-2

Page 40: Mba2011

Mobile Assessment: MOCA

More Info: http://www.utexas.edu/academic/ctl/about/postcards/casestudy4_moca.pdf

Page 41: Mba2011

Available at http://www.itap.purdue.edu/studio/

Page 44: Mba2011

eBooks

Page 45: Mba2011

Click on the poll to vote

Page 46: Mba2011
Page 48: Mba2011

The book works really well

• The book is the ultimate “reader”

• Inexpensive – You get free reader hardware with each physical book purchased– No batteries needed– Very durable– So simple a 2-year old

could use it

• No other user interacts with the physical content more than students– Highlighting– Note taking– Bookmarking– Flipping– Multiple books a once

Page 49: Mba2011
Page 50: Mba2011

Reasons for Purchasing eBooks• 14% of students have purchased a digital

product as part of their studies

• Price is the primary factor

• Only way to obtain the textbook [out of stock, preference by the professor, custom PDF type eBook that the professor created for sale].

• 18% of students who purchased an eBook did so because they enjoy the features

• 10% of students who purchased an eBook did so because they had never used one and were curious

Page 51: Mba2011

Improved Performance or Efficiency

• Being able to search for a particular word or phrase in the textbook has improved my efficiency in studying.

• I use my laptop extensively and take notes on it, so having a copy of the book on my laptop at all times helped me work on my class work whenever I want without having to worry about whether or not I have the book with me.

• No 10-lb book to carry around = epic win.

Top 5 Current Features, as rated by students:

1. Reading Controls (paging, zoom…)

2. Finding terms in a book3. Creating Highlights and

Annotations4. Reviewing previously

created Highlight and Annotations

5. Managing your Digital Library

Page 52: Mba2011

Features Students Want

• Search within and across content

• Annotation/highlight and sharing of notes

• Downloaded texts over online access - Flexibility of where and when they can access their books.

• Integration with other course content including lecture notes, professor guidance…

Page 53: Mba2011

S

Heavy duty studyingHome/Library

Digital Content Ecosystem(cloud hosted digital locker)

Sync through a common cloud (locker)

Reading on the go.Light studying

Page 54: Mba2011

Textbooks

Internet/Other Content

Study Aids/Other Books

Instructor Supplied

Class/Study Notes

Reader

Note Taking

Content Management

Study Ad-ins Trade BooksPeriodicals

Com

mon Interface, F

ormat and S

mart E

xtracts

Ecosystem-Commerce-Sharing-Messaging-Annotation

Reader Platform

The Reading/Studying Ecosystem

Page 55: Mba2011

Digital Rights Management

• DRM is a necessary part of a full featured e-reading solution

• Major education publishers require a proven system of DRM

• Due to content’s high price and students shared interest, higher education content is under greater risk of piracy

• Components of DRM

– Content distribution limitations

– Print limitations

– Copy/Paste limitations

Page 56: Mba2011

Overall Research Conclusions

• Given the opportunity, students are willing to experiment with reading and studying digitally.

• When students do read and study digitally, results indicate that they find it as effective or more effective than studying with the physical book.

• When students do read and study digitally, their responses to usability of features shows that their expectations are high.– Expect basic features to be as

good as print experience (e.g., notes and annotations.)

– Also, expect that there are compelling features that go beyond what is feasible in the physical book experience (e.g., tags across notes, organizational capabilities.)

Page 57: Mba2011

Conclusions

• E-Reading in higher education is more about e-studying than e-reading.

• Evaluate solutions on the entire ecosystem – Hardware , e-Reading/Study Software– Available Content

• Tablets and portable devices are currently satellites to a PC/Mac base. This will change over time.

• Constantly poll your students and faculty.• Don’t over commit--this is going to be a longer

transition than other digital media.

Page 58: Mba2011

Future Trends

• As portable and tablet capabilities improve, so will their ability to support e-textbook content/platforms.

• Content trends– Increase in smaller and specialized content – Increase in multimedia content– New distribution models including subscriptions, open

source content, and institutionally-developed. • There will be a blurring of lines between ereaders,

LMS, and internet resources.

Page 59: Mba2011

University of Notre Dame: COB

Page 60: Mba2011

Students said…

• Like size, lighter than laptop

• Like speed, fast than laptop—instantly on

• More convenient than iPhone—read/write email

• Highly mobile• Like having everything in

one place• Opens attachments well

Page 64: Mba2011

Measuring the Impact

Page 65: Mba2011

QUESTION

What are some items you’d like to measure in evaluating your mobile learning initiatives?

Page 67: Mba2011

Focus Areas

if student enjoyed the

learning experience

how students feel about

interacting with fellow learners

how students felt about their

relationship to their instructors in the mobile blended

learning environment

mobile blended classroom’s effects on

students’ study habits

Page 68: Mba2011
Page 69: Mba2011

MOBILE LEARNING IN A MEDICAL SCHOOL: CASE STUDYSource: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/10/57

Page 70: Mba2011

Context

• 57 students in cohort• 4-year

– Bachelor of Medicine – Bachelor of Surgery

• 2 online tools– Blackboard – Interlearn

• Students had access to – Internet– Customized software – Info repositories

• Sharing info within and between cohorts

• 2 Research Questions– In what ways does ML

support learning?– What areas need

development?

Page 71: Mba2011

Content Access

Page 72: Mba2011

Student Improvement Suggestions

• Better and more electronic learning resources – more materials,

especially audiovisual resources

– a more logically arranged VLE

– more flexibility in accessing materials

• Guidelines on managing the VLE

• Improvements to VLE– Streamlining

organization of information

– Reduced the number of clicks to access resources

– orientation for students

Page 73: Mba2011

CENTRAL MOBILITY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MDSource: http://www.mobility.umd.edu/

Page 74: Mba2011

Initiative Goals

Enhance the classroom learning experience

Promote interaction between faculty and students

Promote the university's world class status through innovation and technology

Enhance the personal safety of students

Page 75: Mba2011

Methods

iPod Touch devices with

Media Diary app provided to

students

Pre and post surveys

Students tracked daily media

usage habits for a period of two

weeks

Page 76: Mba2011

Year 1

• 175 students - ~40% iPhone/~60% iPod Touch• Weekly seminars during Fall 2008• Applications:

– Mobile Portal– MyeVu– Clickers

• Pre- and post- semester evaluations

Page 77: Mba2011

Sample Questions

• How would you describe the experience of participating in the media diary project? – Please give specific

examples to demonstrate your answer.

• Describe your use of technology to maintain your media diary. – How would you assess

the role of technology in completing this project?

– Please provide specific examples reflecting on the pros and cons of using or not using mobile devices to record your data.

Page 78: Mba2011

Year 2

• Engaged faculty:– Center for Teaching

Excellence Summer Institute

• 6 faculty fellows

– Call for Proposals process

• 4 faculty fellows

• IDed specific courses: Comm, PE, Journalism

• Build customized mobile learning experiences

• Specifically evaluated those learning goals

• Offered a mobile programming course

Page 79: Mba2011

Mobile Tool Uses

• Integration into the course/learning experience

• Communication with classmates

• Communication with instructors

• Access to course materials (syllabus, assignments, schedules)

• Conduct research • Other activities (internal

and external to institution)

Page 80: Mba2011

APP RUBRIC Johns Hopkins University 10/18/2010

Page 81: Mba2011

Curriculum ConnectionAuthenticity

FeedbackDifferentiationUser Friendliness

Student Motivation

Page 82: Mba2011
Page 84: Mba2011

Section 6: Course Technology

1. The tools and media support the learning objectives, and are appropriately chosen to deliver the content of the course.

2. The tools and media support student engagement and guide the student to become an active learner.

3. Navigation throughout the online components of the course is logical, consistent, and efficient.

4. Students have ready access to the technologies required in the course.

5. The course components are compatible with current standards for delivery modes.

6. Instructions on how to access resources at a distance are sufficient and easy to understand.

7. The course design takes full advantage of available tools and media.

Page 85: Mba2011

Review technologies and ask…

• What would be the ramifications and opportunities for learning if this technology were adopted?

• What kinds of teaching and learning engagements might this technology: make better or enable?

• If we decide to do a pilot, what kind of evaluation methodology can we overlay on the project to assess outcomes?

• What kind of additional research needs to be done concerning this technology?

Page 86: Mba2011

5 recommendations

• Capture and analyze learning in context with consideration of learner privacy

• Assess the usability of the technology and how it affects the learning experience (PLE)

• Look beyond measurable cognitive gains into changes in the learning process and practice

• Consider organizational issues in the adoption of mobile learning practice and its integration with existing practices

• Span the lifecycle of the mobile learning innovation that is evaluated, from conception to full deployment and beyond

Page 87: Mba2011

QUESTIONS

What are your challenges/opportunities in mobile learning?

What research in this area might be useful to the community to further mobility?

Page 88: Mba2011

Click on the poll to vote

Page 90: Mba2011

Veronica Diaz, PhDAssociate Director

EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative

[email protected]://www.educause.edu/eli