Upload
sandia-national-laboratories-energy-climate-renewables
View
83
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Naughton8/31/2016 Sandia Blade Workshop 1
V&V of Models for Wind Turbine and Wind Plant Aerodynamics:
The Relationship to Blade Design
Jonathan NaughtonProfessor of Mechanical Engineering
Director, Wind Energy Research CenterUniversity of Wyoming
Naughton8/31/2016 Sandia Blade Workshop 2
Overview
• Introduction• V&V Process• Application to Wind Turbine and Wind
Plant• Impact of V&V of WT and WP on Blade
Design• Summary and next steps
Naughton8/31/2016 Sandia Blade Workshop 3
IntroductionWhat is V&V?
• Validationú The process of determining
the degree to which a model is an accurate representation of the real world, from the perspective of the intended uses of the model
• Note that validation is not an acceptance/rejection/ endorsement of a model
• Verificationú Code verification
• Software errors or algorithm deficiencies that corrupt simulation results.
ú Solution verification• Human procedural
errors or numerical solution errors that corrupt the simulation
Naughton8/31/2016 Sandia Blade Workshop 4
IntroductionWhat is a Validation Focused Program
• Goalú Formalized highly collaborative approach to planning and executing joint
experimental/modeling programs for the purpose of characterizing model accuracy for an intended application
• Why?ú Provides a transparent, structured, documented approach for integrate
program planning across scalesú Applicable to models of all fidelity, including reduced order modelsú High quality data sets well suited for collaborative model validation effortsú Quantifies prediction uncertainty for use by designers
• Foundation of framework usedú Framework developed for nuclear energy, SNL NW, and other programs ú Framework consistent with various ASME and AIAA V&V Guides, Codes and
Standards
Naughton8/31/2016 Sandia Blade Workshop 6
IntroductionWhy is V&V needed
• Without a level of trust of our tools, there results are of limited value
• Recently, our ability to simulate wind turbine and wind farm simulations has outstripped our ability to know whether the results are meaningful
Computational simulations complements of Jay Sitaraman and Dimitri Mavriplis
Naughton8/31/2016 Sandia Blade Workshop 7
IntroductionMotivation - A2E
• A2E Objectiveú Transform today’s wind plant
operating environment through advanced physics-based modeling, analysis, and simulation capabilities
ú Approach• Development of high fidelity
models• Collection of existing data and
generation of new data through an experimental measurement campaign
• Strategic linking of these efforts through a Validation Focused Program
High Fidelity Modeling Experimental MeasurementCampaign
V&V
Naughton8/31/2016 Sandia Blade Workshop 8
V&V ProcessOverview
• V&V Frameworkú Phenomena Identification
and Ranking Tableú Validation Hierarchyú Prioritizationú Experiment Design,
Execution & Analysisú Verification of Codeú Validation Metric
Determinationú Assessmentú Determination of level of
credibility
Naughton8/31/2016 Sandia Blade Workshop 9
V&V ProcessFramework
P
Application: Specify system scenario and response quantities (SRQ) to be predicted at plant scale
Validation Hierarchy: Identify and prioritize those phenomena for which the models should be tested, the scales and hierarchy required for the tests, and conceptually how the validation tests should occur
Phenomena Identification: Identify and prioritize the plant scale phenomena required for models to successfully predict the SRQ for system scenario
Prioritize experiments within hierarchy based on program needs and resources
Document
Integrated Program Planning
Code Verification: Software and algorithm quality assessment
Experiment Design, Execution & Analysis through tightly coupled experimental/modeling effort
Validation Metrics
Assessment
Credibility of processes used
Document
Solution Verification: Mesh convergence error
Integrated Experiment and
Model Planning and Execution
Document
Naughton8/31/2016 Sandia Blade Workshop 10
V&V ProcessPIRT
PIRT: Phenomenon Importance Ranking Table
• Consensus based• Provides gap analysis of
ability to model phenomena─ Physics gaps─ Numerical gaps─ Data gaps─ Validation gaps
• Gap analysis used to prioritize planning, including experimental planning
Naughton8/31/2016 Sandia Blade Workshop 11
V&V ProcessPIRT Development
• Assemble groups of expertsú Several meetings over the past 24 monthsú Wide range of expertise
• Have the experts identify the physics important to a specific systemú Wind turbineú Wind farm
• Have the experts prioritizeú How important are the physics to the problemú How well do the codes model those physics
• Take results of several executions and distill into a final PIRT• Use the final PIRT to develop a Validation Hierarchy
Naughton8/31/2016 Sandia Blade Workshop 12
V&V ProcessValidation Hierarchy
Increasin
gCo
mplexity
Increasin
gAccuracy
ValidationHierarchy
IntegratedEffectsTests
SeparateEffectsTests
SubsystemTests
SystemTests
CharacterizationTests
Increasin
gScale
Naughton8/31/2016 Sandia Blade Workshop 13
V&V ProcessPrioritization
• Prioritize Experimentsú Program needsú Program funding
• Considerationsú What data is available that can address part/all of a needú What tests are capable of being carried out now or in future
• Facility availability• Experiment development time• Instrumentation maturity• Experiment cost• Funding cycle• Insufficient model capability• Insufficient computational resources
Naughton8/31/2016 Sandia Blade Workshop 14
Application to Wind Turbine/Wind Plant
• Planning steps have been carried outú Wind turbine scaleú Wind plant scale
• Important to consider these are not independent effortsú Wind turbine scale is a
subsystem of wind plant scale
WindTurbineHierarchy
WindPlantHierarchy
Increasin
gCo
nfigurationCo
mplexity
Increasin
gMeasuremen
tAccuracy
Increasin
gScale
Naughton8/31/2016 Sandia Blade Workshop 15
Application to Wind Turbine/Wind PlantPIRT – Wind Turbine
Physics Code Val
Blade Aero / Wake GenerationBlade load distribution effects and rotor thrust H M L L
Integrates to Rotor Thrust-Torque; Rotor Load Model important for LES-ALM.
Some experiments done for validation. Important to measure for experiments where rotor loading is correlated to wake meas.
Blade-WakeTip and root vortex development, evolution and merging H M L L
Wake PIV Experiments performed, but error bars and QA/QC may be missing or unknown. Does not cover effect of inflow conditions.
Full-scale and sub-scale field sites, and wind tunnel testing. Blade-Wake
Vortex sheet and rollup (in addition to tip/root vortex) M M M L
Some experimental data available that indicates phenomenon are present and may be important to wake stability. Effect of separation uncertain.
Further discovery experiments -> validation experiments.
Blade-WakeBlade generated turbulence characteristics (energetic scales at trailing edge) H L L L Coherent vortices shed from blade, including how they interact
with the atmosphere and near-wake.Full-scale and sub-scale field sites. High bandwidth probes, flow imaging. Blade-Wake
Root flow acceleration effect ('hub jet') Unknown M L L Effects root dynamic pressure and loading.Sensitivity Study to assess importance, qualitative data available.
Blade-Chord
Boundary layer development (transition, separation)
H M L L
Affects airfoil tables -> AL methods. Affects fully resolved modeling requirements (grid, transition model). Depends on incoming turbulence intensity relevant to blade surface boundary layer, depends on surface quality (roughness, soiling, bugs, erosion).
Wind tunnel and field tests.
Chord
Surface roughness effects (roughness, soiling, bugs, erosion) H L L L
Directly influences boundary layer development and blade loads.
Wind tunnel and field tests. Full scale surface quantification.
Chord
Boundary layer details near leading and trailing edge H M L L
Relates to boundary layer development, and important for aeroacoustics. Full-scale and sub-scale field sites
Chord
Rotational augmentationH L L L
Inability of HFM models to capture stall consistently. Tests done on multiple rotor scales, need to assess gaps remaining from tests.
Chord
Dynamic stallH L L L
2D data based on non-specific wind turbine airfoils and/or are limited to lower Reynolds numbers than relevant to full-scale.
Tests done on multiple rotor scales, need to assess gaps remaining from tests.
Chord
Unsteady inflow effect (veer, shear, yaw, gusts, atmospheric stability, turbulence intensity, spectra, coherence)
H L L LLarger time scale than what affects blade surface BL, but faster than that allowed by steady-state on chord scale. Full-scale and sub-scale field sites,
and wind tunnel testing.Blade-Wake-ABL
Blade flow controlM L L L Can be used to enhance blade performance and alleviate loads.
Full-scale and sub-scale field sites, and wind tunnel testing.
Blade-Chord
IcingH L L L Importance depends on regional climate (Northeast vs Midwest).Full-scale and wind tunnel testing.
Blade-Chord
Wake Development (growth/recovery) Skew and meander of aggregate wake H L L L Gross movement and deflection of far-wake.
Full-scale and sub-scale field sites, and wind tunnel testing. Wake
Swirl instability L L L L Interaction of axial and tangential momentum Wind tunnel tests. WakeVortex merging L L L L Important for the far-wake and turbine-turbine interaction. Sub-scale field sites and wind tunnel
testing. WakeWake vorticity diffusion and dissipation H L L L Important to wake recovery and far-wake properties.
Sub-scale field sites and wind tunnel testing. Wake
Asymmetry effects (ground plane, yaw, tilt, cone-angle) M M L L Influence the wake stability, recovery, meander, and vertical and horizontal deflection.
Full-scale and sub-scale field sites, and wind tunnel testing. Wake
Inflow effect (shear, veer, yaw, turb. intensity, turb. spectrum, coherence, gusts, atmos. stab.)
H L L LFull scale data often does not measure to top of turbine, limited to single vertical profile. Full-scale and sub-scale field sites,
and wind tunnel testing. Wake-ABLTower/rotor/nacelle wake interactions H M L L Primarily included for noise, also influence blade and wake. Full-scale and sub-scale field sites Turbine-WakeAeroelasticity H M L L Rated for very large blades. Full-scale and sub-scale field sites,
and wind tunnel testing. BladeAeroacoustics H M L L Noise sources, mainly trailing edge, root, and tip.
Full-scale and sub-scale field sites and wind tunnel. Blade-Chord
Planning Priority
Phenomenon Importance
at Application
Level
Model Adequacy InterfaceIssue/Comments Response Including Scale
Physics Code Val
Blade Aero / Wake GenerationBlade load distribution effects and rotor thrust H M L L
Integrates to Rotor Thrust-Torque; Rotor Load Model important for LES-ALM.
Some experiments done for validation. Important to measure for experiments where rotor loading is correlated to wake meas.
Blade-WakeTip and root vortex development, evolution and merging H M L L
Wake PIV Experiments performed, but error bars and QA/QC may be missing or unknown. Does not cover effect of inflow conditions.
Full-scale and sub-scale field sites, and wind tunnel testing. Blade-Wake
Vortex sheet and rollup (in addition to tip/root vortex) M M M L
Some experimental data available that indicates phenomenon are present and may be important to wake stability. Effect of separation uncertain.
Further discovery experiments -> validation experiments.
Blade-WakeBlade generated turbulence characteristics (energetic scales at trailing edge) H L L L Coherent vortices shed from blade, including how they interact
with the atmosphere and near-wake.Full-scale and sub-scale field sites. High bandwidth probes, flow imaging. Blade-Wake
Root flow acceleration effect ('hub jet') Unknown M L L Effects root dynamic pressure and loading.Sensitivity Study to assess importance, qualitative data available.
Blade-Chord
Boundary layer development (transition, separation)
H M L L
Affects airfoil tables -> AL methods. Affects fully resolved modeling requirements (grid, transition model). Depends on incoming turbulence intensity relevant to blade surface boundary layer, depends on surface quality (roughness, soiling, bugs, erosion).
Wind tunnel and field tests.
Chord
Surface roughness effects (roughness, soiling, bugs, erosion) H L L L
Directly influences boundary layer development and blade loads.
Wind tunnel and field tests. Full scale surface quantification.
Chord
Boundary layer details near leading and trailing edge H M L L
Relates to boundary layer development, and important for aeroacoustics. Full-scale and sub-scale field sites
Chord
Rotational augmentationH L L L
Inability of HFM models to capture stall consistently. Tests done on multiple rotor scales, need to assess gaps remaining from tests.
Chord
Dynamic stallH L L L
2D data based on non-specific wind turbine airfoils and/or are limited to lower Reynolds numbers than relevant to full-scale.
Tests done on multiple rotor scales, need to assess gaps remaining from tests.
Chord
Unsteady inflow effect (veer, shear, yaw, gusts, atmospheric stability, turbulence intensity, spectra, coherence)
H L L LLarger time scale than what affects blade surface BL, but faster than that allowed by steady-state on chord scale. Full-scale and sub-scale field sites,
and wind tunnel testing.Blade-Wake-ABL
Blade flow controlM L L L Can be used to enhance blade performance and alleviate loads.
Full-scale and sub-scale field sites, and wind tunnel testing.
Blade-Chord
IcingH L L L Importance depends on regional climate (Northeast vs Midwest).Full-scale and wind tunnel testing.
Blade-Chord
Wake Development (growth/recovery) Skew and meander of aggregate wake H L L L Gross movement and deflection of far-wake.
Full-scale and sub-scale field sites, and wind tunnel testing. Wake
Swirl instability L L L L Interaction of axial and tangential momentum Wind tunnel tests. WakeVortex merging L L L L Important for the far-wake and turbine-turbine interaction. Sub-scale field sites and wind tunnel
testing. WakeWake vorticity diffusion and dissipation H L L L Important to wake recovery and far-wake properties.
Sub-scale field sites and wind tunnel testing. Wake
Asymmetry effects (ground plane, yaw, tilt, cone-angle) M M L L Influence the wake stability, recovery, meander, and vertical and horizontal deflection.
Full-scale and sub-scale field sites, and wind tunnel testing. Wake
Inflow effect (shear, veer, yaw, turb. intensity, turb. spectrum, coherence, gusts, atmos. stab.)
H L L LFull scale data often does not measure to top of turbine, limited to single vertical profile. Full-scale and sub-scale field sites,
and wind tunnel testing. Wake-ABLTower/rotor/nacelle wake interactions H M L L Primarily included for noise, also influence blade and wake. Full-scale and sub-scale field sites Turbine-WakeAeroelasticity H M L L Rated for very large blades. Full-scale and sub-scale field sites,
and wind tunnel testing. BladeAeroacoustics H M L L Noise sources, mainly trailing edge, root, and tip.
Full-scale and sub-scale field sites and wind tunnel. Blade-Chord
Planning Priority
Phenomenon Importance
at Application
Level
Model Adequacy InterfaceIssue/Comments Response Including Scale
Physics Code Val
Blade Aero / Wake GenerationBlade load distribution effects and rotor thrust H M L L
Integrates to Rotor Thrust-Torque; Rotor Load Model important for LES-ALM.
Some experiments done for validation. Important to measure for experiments where rotor loading is correlated to wake meas.
Blade-WakeTip and root vortex development, evolution and merging H M L L
Wake PIV Experiments performed, but error bars and QA/QC may be missing or unknown. Does not cover effect of inflow conditions.
Full-scale and sub-scale field sites, and wind tunnel testing. Blade-Wake
Vortex sheet and rollup (in addition to tip/root vortex) M M M L
Some experimental data available that indicates phenomenon are present and may be important to wake stability. Effect of separation uncertain.
Further discovery experiments -> validation experiments.
Blade-WakeBlade generated turbulence characteristics (energetic scales at trailing edge) H L L L Coherent vortices shed from blade, including how they interact
with the atmosphere and near-wake.Full-scale and sub-scale field sites. High bandwidth probes, flow imaging. Blade-Wake
Root flow acceleration effect ('hub jet') Unknown M L L Effects root dynamic pressure and loading.Sensitivity Study to assess importance, qualitative data available.
Blade-Chord
Boundary layer development (transition, separation)
H M L L
Affects airfoil tables -> AL methods. Affects fully resolved modeling requirements (grid, transition model). Depends on incoming turbulence intensity relevant to blade surface boundary layer, depends on surface quality (roughness, soiling, bugs, erosion).
Wind tunnel and field tests.
Chord
Surface roughness effects (roughness, soiling, bugs, erosion) H L L L
Directly influences boundary layer development and blade loads.
Wind tunnel and field tests. Full scale surface quantification.
Chord
Boundary layer details near leading and trailing edge H M L L
Relates to boundary layer development, and important for aeroacoustics. Full-scale and sub-scale field sites
Chord
Rotational augmentationH L L L
Inability of HFM models to capture stall consistently. Tests done on multiple rotor scales, need to assess gaps remaining from tests.
Chord
Dynamic stallH L L L
2D data based on non-specific wind turbine airfoils and/or are limited to lower Reynolds numbers than relevant to full-scale.
Tests done on multiple rotor scales, need to assess gaps remaining from tests.
Chord
Unsteady inflow effect (veer, shear, yaw, gusts, atmospheric stability, turbulence intensity, spectra, coherence)
H L L LLarger time scale than what affects blade surface BL, but faster than that allowed by steady-state on chord scale. Full-scale and sub-scale field sites,
and wind tunnel testing.Blade-Wake-ABL
Blade flow controlM L L L Can be used to enhance blade performance and alleviate loads.
Full-scale and sub-scale field sites, and wind tunnel testing.
Blade-Chord
IcingH L L L Importance depends on regional climate (Northeast vs Midwest).Full-scale and wind tunnel testing.
Blade-Chord
Wake Development (growth/recovery) Skew and meander of aggregate wake H L L L Gross movement and deflection of far-wake.
Full-scale and sub-scale field sites, and wind tunnel testing. Wake
Swirl instability L L L L Interaction of axial and tangential momentum Wind tunnel tests. WakeVortex merging L L L L Important for the far-wake and turbine-turbine interaction. Sub-scale field sites and wind tunnel
testing. WakeWake vorticity diffusion and dissipation H L L L Important to wake recovery and far-wake properties.
Sub-scale field sites and wind tunnel testing. Wake
Asymmetry effects (ground plane, yaw, tilt, cone-angle) M M L L Influence the wake stability, recovery, meander, and vertical and horizontal deflection.
Full-scale and sub-scale field sites, and wind tunnel testing. Wake
Inflow effect (shear, veer, yaw, turb. intensity, turb. spectrum, coherence, gusts, atmos. stab.)
H L L LFull scale data often does not measure to top of turbine, limited to single vertical profile. Full-scale and sub-scale field sites,
and wind tunnel testing. Wake-ABLTower/rotor/nacelle wake interactions H M L L Primarily included for noise, also influence blade and wake. Full-scale and sub-scale field sites Turbine-WakeAeroelasticity H M L L Rated for very large blades. Full-scale and sub-scale field sites,
and wind tunnel testing. BladeAeroacoustics H M L L Noise sources, mainly trailing edge, root, and tip.
Full-scale and sub-scale field sites and wind tunnel. Blade-Chord
Planning Priority
Phenomenon Importance
at Application
Level
Model Adequacy InterfaceIssue/Comments Response Including Scale
Naughton8/31/2016 Sandia Blade Workshop 16
Application to Wind Turbine/Wind PlantPIRT – Wind Plant
Physics Code Val
Inflow Turbulence/Wake Interaction
Wind direction (shear/veer/assymetry) H L M M Wake sensitivity to gusts, low-level jets, etc. that promote three-dimensional boundary layers Wind tunnel and field tests. ABL/Turbine
Turbulence characteristics (intensity, spectra, coherence, stability) H L M M Wake sensitivity to turbulence Wind tunnel and field tests using real
and psuedo ABL spectra ABL
Coherent turblence structure H L M L Wake sensitivity to organized structures Difficult to test, but could include both wind tunnel and field tests. ABL
Surface conditions (roughness, canopy, waves, surface heat flux, topography) H L M M Wake sensitivity to changes in ABL due to surface features Wind tunnel and field testing looking at
changes in ABL ABL
Momentum transport (horizontal and vertical fluxes) H L L L Wake sensitivity to momentum supplied by ABL. Side-flow is
a special case, as well as the deep array. Wind tunnel and field tests. ABL
Multi-Turbine Wake EffectsWake interaction, merging, meander
H L L L Physics behind unsteady wake behavior Wind tunnel and field tests.
Plant flow control for optimum performance H M M L Strategies for optimizing the wind farm rather than individual
turbinesSubscale and full scale field tests. Large controlled facility tests.
Wake steering (yaw & tilt effects)H L L L Effect of non-normal inflow on wake behavior. Useful for
control. Wind tunnel and field tests.
Wake dissipationH L L L Evolution toward a neglibly small wake Wind tunnel and field test
Wake Impingement (full, half, etc.)H L L L Effect of upstream wake position on downstream turbine Wind tunnel and field test
Deep array effects (change in turbulence, etc.) H L L L Emphasis on the behavior of the flow within the wind plant Wind tunnel and full scale field test
Other EffectsWind plant blockage effects and plant wake
M M M L Emphasis on the effect of the wind farm on cross-stream downstream regions Wind tunnel and full scale field test ABL
Acoustic PropagationH L L L Noise generation and propogation through a wind plant Full-scale and sub-scale field sites Turbine
Planning Priority
Response Including Scale InterfacePhenomenon
Importance at
Application Level
Model Adequacy Issue/Comments
Naughton8/31/2016 Sandia Blade Workshop 17
Application to Wind Turbine/Wind PlantValidation Hierarchy – Wind Turbine
SingleIndustrialScaleTurbineInField
SingleTurbineValidationHierarchy
IntegratedEffects(Benchmark)
SeparateEffects(UnitProblems)
Subsystem
System
ScaledTurbineInField
SingleTurbineinLWT
PitchingBlade
FixedAirfoils
PitchingAirfoil
BoundaryLayer
AxisymmetricWake
RootVortexTipVortex
FixedAeroelasticBlade
AirfoilFlowControl
BladeFlowControl
SingleTurbineinWTwithTI
AirfoilwithIcingAirfoilwithTI SingleTurbineinSWTwithTI
FixedBlade
AxisymmetricWakewithSwirl
Naughton8/31/2016 Sandia Blade Workshop 18
Application to Wind Turbine/Wind PlantValidation Hierarchy – Wind Plant
IndustrialScaleWindPlant
WindPlantValidationHierarchy
ScaledWindFarmInField
ScaledWindFarminWindTunnel
InfiniteWindFarmWindTunnel
Wake/TurbineInteractioninWindTunnel
MultipleWakeswithInflowTurbulence
WakeSteer/Veer
SingleWindTurbineHierarchy
IntegratedEffects(Benchmark)
SeparateEffects(UnitProblems)
Subsystem
System
Naughton8/31/2016 Sandia Blade Workshop 19
Application to Wind Turbine/Wind PlantPrioritized Phenomena Experimental Mapping
Blad
eAe
ro/W
akeGeneration
BladeLoadDistributionEffects
Tip&Roo
tVortexEvolution
VortexSheetEvolutio
n
BladeGe
neratedTurbulence
RootFlowAcceleration
BoundaryLayerDevelopment
SurfaceRo
ughnessE
ffects
BoundaryLayerNearLEandTE
Rotatio
nalA
ugmen
tatio
n
DynamicStall
UnsteadyInflo
wEffects*
BladeFlow
Control
Icing
PhysicsPresent/PhysicsMeasured
EntirelyMostlySomewhatLimitedMissing
BoundaryLayer
PhysicsPresent
PhysicsCapturedbyMeasurements
AxisymmetricWake(withSwirl)
PhysicsPresent
PhysicsCapturedbyMeasurements
Root/TipVortex
PhysicsPresent
PhysicsCapturedbyMeasurements
FixedAirfoils(withflowcontrol)
PhysicsPresent
PhysicsCapturedbyMeasurements
TestingIssues
BoundaryCon
ditio
ns
ScaleEffects
FixedBlade(withTurbulentInflow)
PhysicsPresent
PhysicsCapturedbyMeasurements
Increasin
gCo
mplexity
Increasin
gAccuracy
ValidationHierarchy
IntegratedEffectsTests
SeparateEffectsTests
SubsystemTests
SystemTests
CharacterizationTests
Increasin
gScale
Naughton8/31/2016 Sandia Blade Workshop 20
Application to Wind Turbine/Wind PlantPrioritized Phenomena Experimental Mapping
PitchingAirfoil
PhysicsPresent
PhysicsCapturedbyMeasurements
AirfoilwithIcing
PhysicsPresent
PhysicsCapturedbyMeasurements
FixedAeroelasticblade
PhysicsPresent
PhysicsCapturedbyMeasurements
SingleWindTurbine(Small)inWindTunnel
PhysicsPresent
PhysicsCapturedbyMeasurements
Blad
eAe
ro/W
akeGeneration
BladeLoadDistributionEffects
Tip&Roo
tVortexEvolution
VortexSheetEvolutio
n
BladeGe
neratedTurbulence
RootFlowAcceleration
BoundaryLayerDevelopment
SurfaceRo
ughnessE
ffects
BoundaryLayerNearLEandTE
Rotatio
nalA
ugmen
tatio
n
DynamicStall
UnsteadyInflo
wEffects*
BladeFlow
Control
Icing
PhysicsPresent/PhysicsMeasured
EntirelyMostlySomewhatLimitedMissing
TestingIssues
BoundaryCon
ditio
ns
ScaleEffects
Increasin
gCo
mplexity
Increasin
gAccuracy
ValidationHierarchy
IntegratedEffectsTests
SeparateEffectsTests
SubsystemTests
SystemTests
CharacterizationTests
Increasin
gScale
Naughton8/31/2016 Sandia Blade Workshop 21
Application to Wind Turbine/Wind PlantPrioritized Phenomena Experimental Mapping
Increasin
gCo
mplexity
Increasin
gAccuracy
ValidationHierarchy
IntegratedEffectsTests
SeparateEffectsTests
SubsystemTests
SystemTests
CharacterizationTests
Increasin
gScale
Blad
eAe
ro/W
akeGe
neratio
n
BladeLoadDistributionEffects
Tip&Roo
tVortexEvolution
VortexSheetEvolutio
n
BladeGe
neratedTurbulence
RootFlowAcceleration
BoundaryLayerDevelopment
SurfaceRo
ughnessE
ffects
BoundaryLayerNearLEandTE
Rotatio
nalA
ugmen
tatio
n
DynamicStall
UnsteadyInflo
wEffects*
BladeFlow
Control
Icing
PhysicsPresent/PhysicsMeasured
EntirelyMostlySomewhatLimitedMissing
PitchingBlade(withFlowControl)
PhysicsPresent
PhysicsCapturedbyMeasurements
TurbineinVLWT(~5mrotor)
PhysicsPresent
PhysicsCapturedbyMeasurements
TurbineinWT(~1mrotor),TurbulentInflow
PhysicsPresent
PhysicsCapturedbyMeasurements
ScaledTurbineinField(~30mrotor)
PhysicsPresent
PhysicsCapturedbyMeasurementsTestingIssues
BoundaryCon
ditio
ns
ScaleEffects
IndustrialScaleTurbineinField(~120mrotor)
PhysicsPresent
PhysicsCapturedbyMeasurements
Naughton8/31/2016 Sandia Blade Workshop 22
Application to Wind Turbine/Wind PlantPrioritized Phenomena Experimental Mapping
• Similar PPEMs exist for turbine wakes and wind plants
• Allow for rapid identification of impact of different experiments and their rolesú Some experiments capture limited physics
• Physics – usually captured by measurements
• Boundary conditions- typically well characterized
ú Some experiments capture most of the physics
• Physics – not always captured by measurements
• Boundary conditions - typically limited characterization
• Poorly understood scaling effects are also designed into experiments
Multi-TurbineWakeEffects
Interaction,M
erging,M
otion
Steerin
g(Yaw
/TiltEffe
cts)
WakeDissipation
WakeIm
pingem
ent(Full/Ha
lf/Near)
Inflo
wTurbu
lenceWakeInteraction
WindDirection
SurfaceCo
nditions
TurbulenceStatistics
Mom
entumTranspo
rt
Acou
sticPropagatio
n
PhysicsPresent/PhysicsMeasured
EntirelyMostlySomewhatLimitedMissing
TestingIssues
BoundaryCon
ditio
ns
ScaleEffects
Wake/TurbineInteractioninWT(~2mrotor)
PhysicsPresent
PhysicsCapturedbyMeasurements
IndustrialScaleWindPlant(~120mrotor)
PhysicsPresent
PhysicsCapturedbyMeasurements
InfiniteWindFarminWindTunnel(~0.2mrotor)
PhysicsPresent
PhysicsCapturedbyMeasurements
ScaledWindFarminField(~30mrotor)
PhysicsPresent
PhysicsCapturedbyMeasurements
MultiWakeswithInflowTurbulence(~0.2mrotor)
PhysicsPresent
PhysicsCapturedbyMeasurements
ScaledWindFarminVLWT(~2mrotor)
PhysicsPresent
PhysicsCapturedbyMeasurements
WakeSteer/Veer(~0.2mrotor)
PhysicsPresent
PhysicsCapturedbyMeasurements
Naughton8/31/2016 Sandia Blade Workshop 23
Impact of V&V of WT and WP on Blade Design
• Path for validating codes is now availableú Experimental validationú High fidelity/low fidelity code
comparison• Blades of the future can be
designed using rigorously validated design tools
• Industry, government labs, and academia can all play a role in the validation processú Share data
• Details!ú Perform validationú Provide feedback
• Blades design may be fundamentally changed as understanding of wind farm performance increasesú What attributes of a blade
produce the most favorable wake?
• Site specific• Condition specific
Naughton8/31/2016 Sandia Blade Workshop 24
Impact of V&V of WT and WP on Blade Design
• Blades will have to be designed for scaled experimentsú Goal is to capture the physics
relevant to the industrial wake with sub-scale blades
• Two design approachesú Sandia – circulation based
approachú UW – normalized blade force
approach• Two applications
ú SWIFTú 1-m blade in controlled inflow
Naughton8/31/2016 Sandia Blade Workshop 25
Summary and Next Steps
• Integrated Program Planning nearly completeú Application identifiedú PIRT completed
• SMEs involved• Consensus identified
ú Validation Hierarchy developedú Validation experiments mapped
onto prioritized phenomena (PPEM)
ú Report to appear soon• In review• Expected release in near future
ú Contact David Maniaci
• Integrated Experiment and Model Planning and Executionú Underway for some prioritized
validation experiments• Experiments proposed for all
levels of validation hierarchyú Planning for other experiments to
take place as opportunity allowsú Other groups may use this
document as well and identify other gaps in scenarios available for validation
Naughton8/31/2016 Sandia Blade Workshop 26
Acknowledgements• Jonathan Naughton’s contribution to this work is supported by
Sandia National Laboratory• Details of applying the V&V process to wind energy guided and
refined in collaboration with Rich Hills and David Maniaci of Sandia National Labs
• Input from many experts in the wind energy area are too many to mention, but are acknowledged here
• Particular thanks to contributions from ú Steve Hammond, NREL ú Daniel Laird, NRELú Brian Resor, Sandiaú Mike Robinson, NREL/DOEú Scott Schreck, NRELú Fotis Sotiropoulos, UMú Paul Veers, NRELú Steve Wombold,Sandia