47
”(The online world) has broken down barriers…between people and information, democratizing access to human knowledge. This has made us much more powerful as individuals.” - Eric Schmidt THIRD MILLENNIUM PROBLEM-SOLVING Tackling accelerating change through tools of visualization, collaboration and citizen empowerment David Brin - October 2008

How the Net Betrays Discourse

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Slides for the "tech talk" given by David Brin and Sheldon Brown at Google late 2006.http://tinyurl.com/yy7yxm Where does the Net fit into 500 years of expanding tools for vision, memory and perspective? What missing pieces are people not noticing that might vastly improve problem-solving?

Citation preview

Page 1: How the Net Betrays Discourse

”(The online world) has broken down barriers…between people and information, democratizing access to human knowledge. This has made

us much more powerful as individuals.” - Eric Schmidt

”(The online world) has broken down barriers…between people and information, democratizing access to human knowledge. This has made

us much more powerful as individuals.” - Eric Schmidt

THIRD MILLENNIUM PROBLEM-SOLVING

Tackling accelerating change throughtools of visualization, collaboration

and citizen empowerment

David Brin - October 2008

THIRD MILLENNIUM PROBLEM-SOLVING

Tackling accelerating change throughtools of visualization, collaboration

and citizen empowerment

David Brin - October 2008

Page 2: How the Net Betrays Discourse

? ? ?

Progress in Visualization, Memory, Attention

Art

RepresentationAbstraction

Telecommunications

Mass Culture

Cinema

Photography

Non-western Art

Perspective Printing Press

Symbolism

Non-narrative

Entertainment

Advanced modelling & AR

Radio

Linked databases

TelevisionPersonal & business

Computing

Gaming

Internet

SimulationGlobal

Interaction

Knowledge Mesh

World Wide Web

Personal creativity tools

Lensestelescopes, microscopes

Mass literacy

Schools/libraries

Scientific models

Omni-veillance

Perspective

Speculative Mindset

Advanced gaming & VR

? ? ? ??

Speculative Fiction

Singularity? Renunciation? Muddle-along? Crisis?

A.I.

?

Page 3: How the Net Betrays Discourse

Would the early religious petitioners during the English Civil War, and the printers who spread their ideas have been able to predict that monarchs would be replaced by constitutions?

Would Bacon and Newton have dreamed that entire populations, and not just geniuses, would aggregate knowledge and turn it into technology?

Would those who used slow modems to transmit black and white text on the early Internet 15 years ago have foreseen YouTube?

-- Howard Rheingold, author of Smart Mobs

Page 4: How the Net Betrays Discourse

Disruptive Techs Provoke “Crises of Progress”by transforming or augmenting vision, memory and attention.

Each time, the new info-surfeit seems overwhelming, scary, unmanageable.

• 15th - 17th Century– Printing (augments Memory)– Glass Lenses (augment Vision)– Perspective (augments Attention)

• 18th Century– Mass Literacy (Memory)– Printed illustration (Vision)– Science, Democracy (Attention)

• 19th Century– Mass Education, public libraries– Photography, cinema – Global Connection, closed frontiers

• 20th Century– Computing, databases (memory)

– Television, mass media (vision)

– Abstraction & immersion (attention)

• 21st Century– Knowledge Mesh (super-memory)– Omni-veillance (super-vision)– Visualization, simulation & gaming (super-

immersion)

Crisis: Religious Upheaval (e.g. 30 Years War)

Quandary: Renaissance vs. rigid doctrine

Concepts: The notion of progress. Value of individual

Crisis: Bourgeois Revolution

Quandary: Enlightenment vs. old hierarchies

Concept: Commerce = unsupervised generative process

Crisis: Nationalism-Colonialism-suffrage

Quandaries: Industrialism vs. Nostalgia, Centralization.

Concepts: Evolution. Plural viewpoints

Crisis: Dogmatic ideologies

Quandary: Modernism vs. Subjectivism

Concepts: Individual autonomy. Diversity.

Crisis: Breakdown in coherency/confidence

Quandary: Singularity vs. Renunciation

Concept: The future as a human-wrought construct

Page 5: How the Net Betrays Discourse

Key lessons from History:

Each technological wave offers godlike expansions of vision, knowledge, attention… and reach.

Every wave triggers fear of hubris and/or self-destruction. Some call for renunciation or control of the new powers by a trusted elite.

Despite crises, we never refuse the new tools/prosthetics.

Tempted by hierarchical supervision, Western Civilization always opts to share disrupting tech with the masses… and people always adapt.

Professionalization trend seems to centralize. Danger of brittleness. But expertise can also proliferate.

Soon “godlike powers” became accustomed norm, expanding creative commerce, education and citizenship.

Key lessons from History:

Each technological wave offers godlike expansions of vision, knowledge, attention… and reach.

Every wave triggers fear of hubris and/or self-destruction. Some call for renunciation or control of the new powers by a trusted elite.

Despite crises, we never refuse the new tools/prosthetics.

Tempted by hierarchical supervision, Western Civilization always opts to share disrupting tech with the masses… and people always adapt.

Professionalization trend seems to centralize. Danger of brittleness. But expertise can also proliferate.

Soon “godlike powers” became accustomed norm, expanding creative commerce, education and citizenship.

So… what new “godlike powers” will tempt us in this millennium?And can the arts of visualization & discourse help us to cope?

So… what new “godlike powers” will tempt us in this millennium?And can the arts of visualization & discourse help us to cope?

Page 6: How the Net Betrays Discourse

Anticipation = Anticipation = daydreams daydreams of a future that never happens.of a future that never happens.

““GedankenexperimentGedankenexperiment” ” hard-wired in prefrontal lobes.hard-wired in prefrontal lobes.

At best -At best - we spot mistakes to avoid.we spot mistakes to avoid.

At worst -At worst - weave alluring delusions.weave alluring delusions.

Efforts to systematically improve anticipation:Efforts to systematically improve anticipation:- Data mining, sifting, visualization.Data mining, sifting, visualization.- Advanced analytics.Advanced analytics.- Accountability arenas (markets, democracy, science…)Accountability arenas (markets, democracy, science…)- Prediction markets (betting) or polling (voting).Prediction markets (betting) or polling (voting).- Prediction Prediction registriesregistries detect good/bad forecasters. detect good/bad forecasters. - Artificial intelligence may augment prefrontal lobes…Artificial intelligence may augment prefrontal lobes…

Page 7: How the Net Betrays Discourse

Representation Modeling AnalyticsRepresentation Modeling Analytics

GamesGames Scientific Visualization

Scientific Visualization

Fiction

(subjective reality)

Fiction

(subjective reality)

Truth(objective reality)

Truth(objective reality)

Sheldon Brown, UCSD

Page 8: How the Net Betrays Discourse

Visualization Tools

Part One:

The Importance of Art

Visualization Tools

Part One:

The Importance of Art

Page 9: How the Net Betrays Discourse

Art highlights human condition of the moment.

Art expresses our assumptions...

…or shakes them up,expressing tension between individual & society.

Images persuade without argument...

21st century cultural landscape is no simple extension of the 20th.

Culture is now a Moore’s law condition.

Page 10: How the Net Betrays Discourse

Sheldon Brown’s Scalable CitySheldon Brown’s Scalable City

Page 11: How the Net Betrays Discourse

Confidential

Page 12: How the Net Betrays Discourse

Full-scale “Galactic” motif

Confidential

Page 13: How the Net Betrays Discourse

Art is also Thought Experimentation

Art is also Thought Experimentation

Newer memes go beyond individualism…

…for example:

Suspicion of authority

Reversal of “time flow of wisdom”

Newer memes go beyond individualism…

…for example:

Suspicion of authority

Reversal of “time flow of wisdom”

Page 14: How the Net Betrays Discourse

Visualization Tools

Part Two:

The Importance of Anticipation

Page 15: How the Net Betrays Discourse

AnticipationAnticipation = daydream models = daydream models of a future that never happens.of a future that never happens.

““GedankenexperimentGedankenexperiment” ” hard-wired in hard-wired in prefrontal lobes.prefrontal lobes.

At best -At best - we we spot mistakesspot mistakes to avoid. to avoid.

At worst -At worst - we weave we weave satisfying delusions.satisfying delusions.

Efforts to systematically improve anticipation:Efforts to systematically improve anticipation:- Data mining, sifting, pre-analysis and visualization.Data mining, sifting, pre-analysis and visualization.- Advanced analytics.Advanced analytics.- Exploit diversity through prediction markets (betting) or polling (voting).Exploit diversity through prediction markets (betting) or polling (voting).- Prediction Prediction registriesregistries aim to distinguish between good/bad forecasters. aim to distinguish between good/bad forecasters.- Enlightenment “accountability arenas” (markets, democracy, science…)Enlightenment “accountability arenas” (markets, democracy, science…)- Artificial intelligence may augment prefrontal lobes…Artificial intelligence may augment prefrontal lobes…

Page 16: How the Net Betrays Discourse

Four general types of information flow affect three levels of society in different ways…Four general types of information flow affect three levels of society in different ways…

Defense briefing excerpt…Defense briefing excerpt…

4 Types of Adversary-Info Flow

Top-down anticipation -- as in Sumeria

Self-organized creativity/sovereignty --Both oldest and newest.

In government, business, science and life, we seek to anticipate: a basic human trait!

Sheep entrails and auguries are replaced by analytic models and efforts to mine all relevant data.

All generations convince themselves that their anticipation methods work… til they don’t.

Society’s 3 layers

Competitive anticipation --the Enlightenment miracle

Excerpted from DTRA , DoD& DHS talks on info security

Page 17: How the Net Betrays Discourse

Formal/hierarchical InstitutionsProtective agencies: e.g. FBI, CIA

Arena-Markets for creative competition:Democracy, science, enterprise & courts.

The People: chaotic and flighty, but ultimate source of creativity, resiliency, accountability and sovereignty.

Information flow among society’s three levels… and within each level.Information flow among society’s three levels… and within each level.

Trap of human nature:

Others need accountability. Foreign rivals, other social levels, other people, other institutions within our level…

But we have reasons for secrecy!

Inherent result: self-deception.

Trap of human nature:

Others need accountability. Foreign rivals, other social levels, other people, other institutions within our level…

But we have reasons for secrecy!

Inherent result: self-deception.

Each part of our civil bargain - every vital trait, e.g. freedom - relies on information flowing.

Like blood. Like oxygen.

-----The true test of maturity?

“Light must shine, even on me. Let’s find a way to do that… while still letting me do my job.”

Each part of our civil bargain - every vital trait, e.g. freedom - relies on information flowing.

Like blood. Like oxygen.

-----The true test of maturity?

“Light must shine, even on me. Let’s find a way to do that… while still letting me do my job.”

POTUSFBI

CIA

CongressCourts

Page 18: How the Net Betrays Discourse

Why is the core Enlightenment innovation counter-intuitive? Most info-age dilemmas are solved by more light, not less.

Why is the core Enlightenment innovation counter-intuitive? Most info-age dilemmas are solved by more light, not less.

And yes, even privacy.And yes, even privacy.

Page 19: How the Net Betrays Discourse

Potential Foes #1: Super-empowered Angry Young MenPotential Foes #1: Super-empowered Angry Young Men

Near-term/probable: Arson

Aim: Spread chaos & economic damageby low-tech means.

Agents: Amorphous bands of grudge-motivated harm-doers (HD). Not easy to profile. (e.g. Columbine.)

Method: Burn forests, buildings, crops. Innumerable very soft targets. Backers supply untraceable, effective ignition devices (e.g. timed or laser). Easily avoid official protective measures.

Potential harm: economic disruption, fear. Danger of a copycat effect.

Special variants: Backers manipulatewide variety of disgruntled/alienated. Leverage Suspicion of Authority mythos. Stimulate a fashion of arson as protest.

Specific preventions: Informant rewards. Massive increase in omni-surveillance?

General solutions: * Raise citizen omni-awareness.(Technological and social.) * Combat nihilism/cynicism through cultural and political means.

Medium/plausible: Classic Terror

Aim: Inflict pain. Draw attention. Ruin morale. Demonstrate West is weak/corrupt.

Agents: Classic “terrorists” & backers

Methods: Disruption. Casualties. Fear, Intimidate & exhaust. Lure unwise reactions.

Potential harm: Vast supply of soft targets.

A myriad variants: * strike super-soft schools, malls, transit. * hit critical bridges, tunnels, choke points. * NBC death-producing attacks. * NBC denial-of-territory attacks.

Preventions: Improve intel & anticipation. Follow the money. Hold meetings to study lots of scenarios. Spend billions protecting weak-link targets.

General Solutions: Reduce supply of anger. Foster universal accountability. Augment citizen-society resiliency so that no single blow alters society enough to seem worth risk and cost. (The “UA93 Effect.”)

Far-devastating: New Gods

Aim: Create tailored pathogens via bio,chemical, or nanotech processes.

Agents: Almost any angry person in 2025.(Grievances raise % of HD*, but even pampered classes generate some.)

Method: When biologists, chemists and molecu-fabs offer “desktop” capability (the way cyberneticists shrank computers), all methods will be in reach of modest skill. Outbreaks may approximate today’s computer viruses, but targeted at real life.

Potential harm: Possibilities range from individual poisonings to new contagions, all the way to “Fermi” extinction.

Special variants: * Intergenerational resentment (e.g. if boomers benefit from life extension). * “Culture War.”

Specific preventions: Massive increase in omni-surveillance? Ban technologies? Luddism.

General solutions: * Increase citizen omni-awareness.(Technological and social.) * Combat nihilism/cynicism.

* HD = Harm-Doers.

Key Conclusion:*Supply of scenarios/targets limitless! *We could go on all day. All century.

*More than “protection” is needed.

Key Conclusion:*Supply of scenarios/targets limitless! *We could go on all day. All century.

*More than “protection” is needed.* HD = Harm-Doers.

Samples from an infinite supply!

Samples from an infinite supply!

What about the “tradeoff” of safety vs freedom?Mustn’t power and knowledge consolidate into

an elite Professional Protector Caste?All prior civs did that…

What about the “tradeoff” of safety vs freedom?Mustn’t power and knowledge consolidate into

an elite Professional Protector Caste?All prior civs did that…

?

…and all failed…and all failed

Page 20: How the Net Betrays Discourse

Potential Foes #2: rival state scenariosPotential Foes #2: rival state scenarios

Near: Subornation

Aim: Exploit divisions in America by finding clades that can be suborned.

Agents: Skilled state operatives.

Method: Subornation is ancient. Always attempted vs rivals.

Harm: Subset of elite or protector caste surreptitiously helps rival agendas.

Recent Variants: * 1941- crony-elitism-naïveté (Lindbergh) * 1947- naïve socialist idealism. (Fuchs) *post 1947- cash-sellouts (Walkers, Hanssen) *always - blackmail (Moscow marine guards)

…all (and many more) remain viable, even likely. Patterns can be hard to detect when all eyes are on other dangers.

Prevention: Counter-intelligence can track patterns of divided loyalty or conflict of interest. Unexplained funds. Time spent in service of rival power. Inexplicable decisions/appointments.

Solutions: Counter-subornation occurs when American society has clear high ground + culture-allure. Rivals grow more worried about defections than we are. This pattern won the Cold War.

Intermediate/plausible: Coolwar

Aim: Ruin U.S. competitive ability through acts of well-targeted sabotage.

Agents: Trained saboteurs make careful use of local recruits & resources, while avoiding exposure. (e.g. blame “terror.”)

Method: Target weak/vital arteries, choke points. Pipelines, tunnels, infrastructure, chemical/medical stores, Internet, phone system, trust networks.

Harm: Economic damage, loss of confidence-trust, rising aversion to modernity-technology, internal blame-cycle. Or blame/scapegoating and war.

Special features: Not likely while state rivals are growth-dependent, needing US econ engine. Plausible when competition for pax leadership grows fierce.

Preventions: Improved intelligence gathering. Massive omni-surveillance?

Solutions: * Citizen omni-awareness. * Culture-suborn rival citizenry so that secret coolwar becomes impossible.

Illustrated in fiction: The Cool War, by Frederik Pohl.Stand on Zanzibar, by John BrunnerEarth, by David Brin

Far/devastating: Tuned Genocide

Aim: Achieve conquest by threatening mass death via technological means.

Agents: Overt attack or surreptitious.

Methods: Terrifying unidirectional death. * microwaves tuned to disrupt specific genetic/ethnic groups. * diseases ethnically targeted or else curable only by restricted vaccine. * nano-mites that infest, then await signal to commence lethal work.

Harm: War-scale death. Compelled surrender. Miscalculation could lead to “Fermi” extinction.

Variants: Innumerable.

Prevention: Better intelligence.

Long Range Solution: Dispersal of competence makes outcome-certainty impossible, renders plan untenable. * Culture-suborn enough of rival populace so secret development is impossible.

Illustrated in fiction: Jitterbug, by Mike McQuay

Despite fresh memory (the Cold War) & historical ubiquity, this category is seldom mentioned post 9/11.

Despite fresh memory (the Cold War) & historical ubiquity, this category is seldom mentioned post 9/11.

All of these methods have copious historical precedent.

All of these methods have copious historical precedent.

Scenario-building and anticipation exercisesreveal a vast, bewildering variety of threats.

No possible combination of tax dollars and skillcan begin to address them all

Scenario-building and anticipation exercisesreveal a vast, bewildering variety of threats.

No possible combination of tax dollars and skillcan begin to address them all

Page 21: How the Net Betrays Discourse

Potential Foes #3: Overconfident innovators/enthusiastsPotential Foes #3: Overconfident innovators/enthusiasts

Near: BioChimeras & Zooneses.

Aim: Improve food supply, better health, cure disease.

Agents: well-intentioned bio-engineers.

Example: Today’s protein (meat) factories create vast human-animal contact. SARS, H5N1, Ebola all crossed human-animal boundary.

Harm: Pandemics. Or fear of same may limit biological science.

Variants: Biological skill tempts workers to “mine” every genome, from bacteria to birds, for cool human improvements.

Preventions: Relentless professional precautions and supervision. Vastly-bigger bio/CDC infrastructure.

General solutions: Breakthroughs that might reduce danger: *meat from tissue culture not animals. *local (shopper-level) assay tools. *artificial intelligence (AI) helps model results before wetware is tried. *citizen omni-awareness.

Intermediate/plausible: Supervolcano

Aim: Tap unlimited geothermal power.

Agents: well-intentioned mega-engineers.

Method: Drill-access Wyoming Hot Spot, a magma needle piercing N.American Plate.

Harm: Unleash Yellowstone Super-Volcano.

Innumerable Variants: * Sudden release of undersea hydrates. * Physics experiments=> black hole or strangelet. * Unleash nanotechnology without precautions. * Retargeting comet or asteroid for ‘harvest.’ * Over-reaction that represses innovation.

Preventions: Develop intel and anticipatory skills of professional protective castes.

Long-term solution: Foster rising perception, intelligence and resiliency on the part of amateurs, skeptics, citizenry, so that all plans benefit from criticism, without criticism stymieing all plans.

Illustrated in fiction: Mother of Storms by Barnes, Blood Music by Bear, Prey by Crichton, Earth by Brin, Heart of the Comet by Benford-Brin.

Far-devastator: A.I. Goes Wrong

Aim: Better computer & robotic servants.

Agents: Company, group, nation seeks advanced tech & competitive advantage.

Harm: Some fear “Fermi” extinction of old-style humanity.

Innumerable Variants: * SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) has, without consulting anybody, switched to “active” beaming: hope to draw attention to Earth. * Meme plague denies populace/elites ability to perceive a range of possibilities. (Many more…)

Preventions: Continue to develop the perception, intelligence and anticipatory skills of the professional protective castes.

Longer solution: Foster rising perception, intelligence and resiliency on the part of amateurs, skeptics, citizenry, so that all plans benefit from criticism, without criticism thwarting all plans.

Illustrated in fiction: by countless dire warnings from Terminator & Collosus to The Matrix. More subtle: Asimov’s Foundation/Robots series and Williamson’s The Humanoids.

Grist for many Hollywood films, this category gets very little attention from threat-analysis or scenario exercises. Yet it could lead either to great harm or overreaction and innovation-suppression.

Grist for many Hollywood films, this category gets very little attention from threat-analysis or scenario exercises. Yet it could lead either to great harm or overreaction and innovation-suppression.

(David Brin - 2006)

But these exercises reveal that harm-doersall share a common, underlying weakness.

The inverse of Enlightenment strength.A fatal allergy to light.

But these exercises reveal that harm-doersall share a common, underlying weakness.

The inverse of Enlightenment strength.A fatal allergy to light.

Page 22: How the Net Betrays Discourse

Near-likely: Privatized Force

Aim: Maintain ferment as a source of demand for lucrative services.

Agents: Various. Some rationalizing good intent. (See #3.)

Harm: Quiet-calm-efficient means of achieving national goals get replaced by noisy-frenetic-inefficient ones that offer opportunities for parasitism.

Variants: hypothetically innumerable -

• Courts and justice privatized.• Mafia model followed wherever govts fail.• Tribal gambling metastasizes.• Privatized force revives mercenary tradition with its own assertive political constituency (e.g. prison guards).

Prevention: Resist convenience of privatized (unaccountable) force. Retain monopoly on coercion held by thoroughly accountable government.

Solution: Recall how Founders wisely rejected the 5,000 year mercenary/ private force tradition.

The alternative - citizen militia - has drawbacks, but also offers profound advantages. (See #5.)

(David Brin - 2006)

Potential Foes # 4: OpportunistsPotential Foes # 4: Opportunists

Intermediate: Globalization Fails

Aim: Keep the world balkanized… or else push opposite extreme - World Government.

Agents: Left wing activists join bank havens and local elites, in order to prevent a loose-but-effective worldwide civil society.

Harm: Shrouded territories benefit from uneven spread of light/accountability. Open societies lose competitive advantage.

Variants: * Balkanization culminates in local nuke wars. * Banking/ownership secrecy becomes world issue. * Counter-trend: cartels/”regional-unions.” * Counter-trend: groundswell for “world government.” * EU “accession” takes off beyond Europe. Snowball effect makes EU de facto world gov model

Preventions: Negotiate credible reforms that establish enough accountability to stave off worldwide calls for planetary government.

Solution: Accept that no imperium lasts forever. Pax Americana can begin thinking about “Whatever Comes Next” (WCN) before facing a fait accompli that it had no part in designing. Pro-actively insist that American instincts re: individualism and dispersed authority be fundamental axioms.

Devastator: Feudalism Returns

Aim: End our recent experiment with “diamond-shaped” social structures. Restore standard human social pyramid.

Agents: Almost any group that heeds the pull of instinct, history and human nature.

Methods: Innumerable. Every society that had metals/agriculture, quickly replaced democracy/markets with command elites. (Under a wide variety of excuses.) We are the sole exception. It has taken hard work. Relentless innovation.

Harm: An end to accountability & agility. Resulting errors in statecraft could lead to “Fermi” extinction.

Variants: *Communist elites, *socialist levelers, *theocracy, *aristocracy, *technocracy, *oligarchy, *kleptocracy -- all offering rationalizations.

Prevention: Protector caste remembers its loyalty-duty to the Experiment, not to leaders, or to themselves.

Solution: Foster reciprocal accountability, individual agility and confident, resilient citizenship.

Note: these examples leave out the most obvious versions of “opportunism.”e.g. theft, looting, extortion, malfeasance, bribery, insider-crony manipulation.

Note: these examples leave out the most obvious versions of “opportunism.”e.g. theft, looting, extortion, malfeasance, bribery, insider-crony manipulation.

All that’s needed is for human nature - and 99% of history - to repeat itself…

All that’s needed is for human nature - and 99% of history - to repeat itself…

What GENERAL strategy would play to all our strengths and all our adversaries’ weaknesses?

What GENERAL strategy would play to all our strengths and all our adversaries’ weaknesses?

Page 23: How the Net Betrays Discourse

Conclusion #2 re: dealing with change

We seek to anticipate by mining every datum and applying ever-more sophisticated models. A worthy goal… and fundamentally delusional!

Because anticipation - no matter how smart - inevitably fails.

When it does, we depend upon the partner of anticipation…

…resilience.

Conclusion #2 re: dealing with change

We seek to anticipate by mining every datum and applying ever-more sophisticated models. A worthy goal… and fundamentally delusional!

Because anticipation - no matter how smart - inevitably fails.

When it does, we depend upon the partner of anticipation…

…resilience.

Conclusion #1 re: information flows.

All plausible foes (e.g. today’s in-fashion nemesis: “terror”) share an allergy to light.

In contrast, democracy, markets and science all do better in the open.

Professional anticipators (govt & business) need short-term secrets - (but exaggerate).

Still the goal must be - a secular trend toward an open-transparent world,since that is the win-win condition for our kind of civilization.

Conclusion #1 re: information flows.

All plausible foes (e.g. today’s in-fashion nemesis: “terror”) share an allergy to light.

In contrast, democracy, markets and science all do better in the open.

Professional anticipators (govt & business) need short-term secrets - (but exaggerate).

Still the goal must be - a secular trend toward an open-transparent world,since that is the win-win condition for our kind of civilization.

Page 24: How the Net Betrays Discourse

Visualization Tools

Part Three:

The Importance ofResilience

Page 25: How the Net Betrays Discourse

The great trend of the 20th Century (and longer)…

…the Professionalization of everything.

Formerly-personal tasks are turned over to specialists. Food, safety, education, production, transport. We owe a lot to this process…

…and it’s drawing to a close!

COUNTER TRENDS

* Demographics - can’t increase number of professionals forever. * Citizen education and access to knowledge. * Intermesh of many “specialized” fields. * Explosion of skilled avocations. * Powerful new augmentations of Vision, Memory and Attention.

The 21st Century may shift from professionalization toward…

…an Age of Amateurs.

What better way to spread resilience?

Alas, despite “smart mob” chic, it won’t be easy…

Page 26: How the Net Betrays Discourse

Critical Choke Points Stymie Citizen Self-Organization in Crises. All of these examples were observed during Katrina. All could be repaired, if prioritized.

Phone

Internet

Electricitypower/failure

Electricitypower/failure

Poor “last mile”connectivity:worse incrisis…

Crisis=>Lack of ANY connection at all…

Overload or official pre-emption

ISP dependency

Abysmal self-organizationsoftware.

No emergencymodes of access

School Bus

C’mon! Let’s evacuate folks with this bus!

Not a chance! Justsit and wait!

Officially-enforced citizen passivity --The common trait shown during Katrina by state, local, federal officials, Republican & Democrat.

Rationalizations: * maintain order * prevent crime * liability concern * peacetime procedures * enforce company, agency, guild privileges

But the subtext underlying official behavior during Katrina:

”The vigorous and effective ad-hoc citizen action thatwe all saw on 9/11must never be allowed again.”

Useless for news etc.

1. Cell System

2. Net Access

3. Taking physical initiative

The lessons of 9/11 were lost during the Katrina Crisis… how could that happen?The lessons of 9/11 were lost during the Katrina Crisis… how could that happen?

Crux: Resilience faces top-down psychological resistance.Crux: Resilience faces top-down psychological resistance.

company-specific

Page 27: How the Net Betrays Discourse

Why Johnny can't codeBASIC used to be on every computer a child touched ---- but today there's no easy way for kids to get hooked on programming.By David Brin

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.

Another under-recognized “choke point” -- a growing disconnect between citizens and the technologies that serve them.

Page 28: How the Net Betrays Discourse

Citizen volunteers - CERT members, Boy Scouts and guardsmen - were essential during the 2007 San Diego firestorm

…as they were on 9/11…

…and during evercrisis since therepublic began.

A lesson we forget at our peril.www.citizencorps.gov/cert/

Page 29: How the Net Betrays Discourse

Like other surges of vision, memory & attention, this one stirs fear.

But other renaissances chose to empower people.

Offer tools to grow. To own the name - “citizen.”

Above all, they will need tools of discourse.

Relevance to homeland security?

http://web.archive.org/web/20070221233757rn_1/e-sheep.com/spiders/http://web.archive.org/web/20070221233757rn_1/e-sheep.com/spiders/

Page 30: How the Net Betrays Discourse

Visualization Tools

Part Four:

The Importance of Discourse

Page 31: How the Net Betrays Discourse

? ? ?

Progress in Visualization, Memory, Attention

Art

RepresentationAbstraction

Telecommunications

Mass Culture

Cinema

Photography

Non-western Art

Perspective Printing Press

Symbolism

Non-narrative

Entertainment

Advanced modelling & AR

Radio

Linked databases

TelevisionPersonal & business

Computing

Gaming

Internet

SimulationGlobal

Interaction

Knowledge Mesh

World Wide Web

Personal creativity tools

Lenses->telescopes, microscopes

Mass literacy

Schools/libraries

Scientific models

Omni-veillance

Perspective

Speculative Mindset

Advanced gaming & VR

? ? ? ??

Speculative Fiction

Singularity? Renunciation? Muddle-along? Crisis?

A.I.

?

Page 32: How the Net Betrays Discourse

Some think we’ll cope with accelerating change…

…and some think we may not.

Other generations adapted new tool sets and squeaked by.

Do we have all the tools we need?

Page 33: How the Net Betrays Discourse

The The RealReal Digital Divide Digital DivideThe The RealReal Digital Divide Digital Divide

Asynchronous Realm web browsing email file sharing / downloads search, research, project collaboration weblogs

Content provider &recipient not present at same time.

Asynchronous Realm web browsing email file sharing / downloads search, research, project collaboration weblogs

Content provider &recipient not present at same time.

Synchronous Realm chat & Instant Messaging interactive gaming virtual worlds avataring telepresence

Content provider &recipient are present at the same time.

Synchronous Realm chat & Instant Messaging interactive gaming virtual worlds avataring telepresence

Content provider &recipient are present at the same time.

• Despite overlap, these realms involve different expectations, customers, discourse.• Both realms should benefit from advances in social networking.• Some interactions, like instant Messaging have both synchronous and asynchronous traits. Crippled by worst combination.• High-end collaboration & “meeting-ware”point to a future when synchronous presence will be attractive to adults.• Just because high-quality is “allowed” doesn’t guarantee it happens. Still, shouldn’t quality be possible?

Notes:

Advanced interfaces assist information Advanced interfaces assist information flow, expression of complex thoughts.flow, expression of complex thoughts.

Useful to grownups… though Useful to grownups… though needing vast improvement.needing vast improvement.

Advanced interfaces assist information Advanced interfaces assist information flow, expression of complex thoughts.flow, expression of complex thoughts.

Useful to grownups… though Useful to grownups… though needing vast improvement.needing vast improvement.

Primitive interfaces dumb-down exchanges Primitive interfaces dumb-down exchanges to the level of flirting, grunts, shooting… to the level of flirting, grunts, shooting…

Except for meetingware, almost Except for meetingware, almost useless to serious people.useless to serious people.

Primitive interfaces dumb-down exchanges Primitive interfaces dumb-down exchanges to the level of flirting, grunts, shooting… to the level of flirting, grunts, shooting…

Except for meetingware, almost Except for meetingware, almost useless to serious people.useless to serious people.

Page 34: How the Net Betrays Discourse

Contemporary “chat” - dreadful! Still using 1960s format!

Contemporary “chat” - dreadful! Still using 1960s format!

Millions of teens on MySpace type billions of words! Immense market!

But depressingly shallow… hopeless for grownup conversation, work or collaboration.

Yes, some like it shallow. But must shallowness be a law of cyberspace?

Millions of teens on MySpace type billions of words! Immense market!

But depressingly shallow… hopeless for grownup conversation, work or collaboration.

Yes, some like it shallow. But must shallowness be a law of cyberspace?

“Avatar Worlds” like There and Second Life limit interaction to grunt flirtation and “ROFL.”

“Avatar Worlds” like There and Second Life limit interaction to grunt flirtation and “ROFL.”

Billions are spent on fine rendering. Cool stuff!

But meanwhile, tools to usefully exchange thoughts and information have languished, undeveloped.

Billions are spent on fine rendering. Cool stuff!

But meanwhile, tools to usefully exchange thoughts and information have languished, undeveloped.

The Synchronous Realm in 2008The Synchronous Realm in 2008……The Synchronous Realm in 2008The Synchronous Realm in 2008……

Page 35: How the Net Betrays Discourse

How far back do discourse talents go? To ancient folk who argued, chatted and planned, learning skills to get the most out of face-to-face interaction…

How far back do discourse talents go? To ancient folk who argued, chatted and planned, learning skills to get the most out of face-to-face interaction…

The “attention economy” isn’t new! Our ancestors

practiced selective focus by -

- adjusting distance

- turning to or away from others

- heeding reputation

- favoring what’s interesting

- remembering what’s important

- adopting rules of courtesy

- keeping a train of thought

- staying alert for surprise.

The “attention economy” isn’t new! Our ancestors

practiced selective focus by -

- adjusting distance

- turning to or away from others

- heeding reputation

- favoring what’s interesting

- remembering what’s important

- adopting rules of courtesy

- keeping a train of thought

- staying alert for surprise.

Discourse & Conversation -Cro-Magnon Style?Discourse & Conversation -Cro-Magnon Style?

Discourse depends on attention, selective focus, prioritization, and countless mental skills/tricks that we take for granted.

Discourse depends on attention, selective focus, prioritization, and countless mental skills/tricks that we take for granted.

Page 36: How the Net Betrays Discourse

Yet, few of these basic skills have usefully arrived onscreen.

Even “social network” designers ignore basics.

Yet, few of these basic skills have usefully arrived onscreen.

Even “social network” designers ignore basics.

We still do all of those things!We still do all of those things!We still do all of those things!We still do all of those things!

High priority attention goes to people you chose to face or get close to.

We adjust attention by many criteria - topic, time, reputation (global & personal), direction, distance.

Least attention paid to those who are away/behind.

Yet, you notice if folks mention your name - or other hot words - even far away!

We divide attention, shift tracks, adapt new priorities.

We track the “gist” of conversation, but can also make careful notes.

And this is just a cocktail party! Inborn attention-agility skyrockets when matters seem important.

Time has effects, but doesn’t lobotomize! Casual talk doesn’t have to be shallow.

Rules of courtesy matter . There are consequences to reputation!

Page 37: How the Net Betrays Discourse

“Gisting” - Semantic ServicesGovernment & academe have knowledge, text & analytic services. But the public lacks intuitive interface.

We need the same access to semantic processing …

“Gisting” - Semantic ServicesGovernment & academe have knowledge, text & analytic services. But the public lacks intuitive interface.

We need the same access to semantic processing …

… that we take for granted in the real world…

… that we take for granted in the real world…

…sifting meaning from the barrage of daily life.

…sifting meaning from the barrage of daily life.

HoloceneHolocene

Page 38: How the Net Betrays Discourse

Attributes affected by priority

• Size of speech/text display

• Rendering (of avatars, video etc.)

• Gisting of contents:(font, size, sift- retain hi-impact words/meanings…)

• Semantic Services (alerts, smart- transcripts, omni-search.)

• Info & action availability.

Traits that affect priority•Orientation (attention-facing)

•Proximity

•Time

•Reputation

•Topic/syntax tagging

A Wish List of services to boost Online DiscourseA Wish List of services to boost Online Discourse

Let’s Illustrate These Wishes As Simply As Possible.

In life, we assign scarce attention by priority.

Sorry, not today

Sorry, not today

Page 39: How the Net Betrays Discourse

How do we know these things never made it online? How do we know these things never made it online?

What never?What never?

Page 40: How the Net Betrays Discourse

United States Patent Application 20030001890 United States Patent No: 7,124,372 January 2, 2003 - Filed: June 12, 2002 Date of Issuance: October 17, 2006

Interactive communication between a plurality of usersInventor: Brin, G. David

Abstract

A novel system, method, and computer program for interactive communication among a plurality of users. The invention, called Holocene Conversation Mode ("HCM"), takes advantage of the observation that human beings have developed or utilize a number of real-world characteristics to participate in, perceive, control, and glean subtleties from conversations. These characteristics include proximity and orientation of a listener to other speakers, memory ageing, emphasis by a speaker, relative importance of a speaker to a listener, reputation of a speaker, and the unique human ability to "filter" words of special interest to a listener from overheard conversations. HCM includes a suite of techniques, including spatial and content compression as a function of some of such characteristics, that can be implemented in various combinations in computer software. HCM supports other forms of user interaction, such as allowing a user to give or send an object to another user, or to allow a user to take an object from another user. In addition, HCM supports "kiosks", in which users can interact with non human resources in the context of a host-defined environment.

Inventors: Brin, Glen David; (Encinitas, CA)Correspondence Name and Address: FISH & RICHARDSON, PC 4350 LA JOLLA VILLAGE DRIVE SUITE 500 SAN DIEGO, CA 92122 US

United States Patent Application 20030001890 United States Patent No: 7,124,372 January 2, 2003 - Filed: June 12, 2002 Date of Issuance: October 17, 2006

Interactive communication between a plurality of usersInventor: Brin, G. David

Abstract

A novel system, method, and computer program for interactive communication among a plurality of users. The invention, called Holocene Conversation Mode ("HCM"), takes advantage of the observation that human beings have developed or utilize a number of real-world characteristics to participate in, perceive, control, and glean subtleties from conversations. These characteristics include proximity and orientation of a listener to other speakers, memory ageing, emphasis by a speaker, relative importance of a speaker to a listener, reputation of a speaker, and the unique human ability to "filter" words of special interest to a listener from overheard conversations. HCM includes a suite of techniques, including spatial and content compression as a function of some of such characteristics, that can be implemented in various combinations in computer software. HCM supports other forms of user interaction, such as allowing a user to give or send an object to another user, or to allow a user to take an object from another user. In addition, HCM supports "kiosks", in which users can interact with non human resources in the context of a host-defined environment.

Inventors: Brin, Glen David; (Encinitas, CA)Correspondence Name and Address: FISH & RICHARDSON, PC 4350 LA JOLLA VILLAGE DRIVE SUITE 500 SAN DIEGO, CA 92122 US

Proof that these traits, properties, services and methods never made it online… No significant “prior art.” These gaps in online discourse are real!

126 claims. covering a vast range of potential onscreenrepresentation and communication methodologies.

126 claims. covering a vast range of potential onscreenrepresentation and communication methodologies.

No… never!

Page 41: How the Net Betrays Discourse

I weep for thee, and yet no cause I have;For why thou left'st me nothing in thy will:And yet thou left'st me more than I did crave;For why I craved nothing of thee still:•yes, dear friend, I •pardon crave of •thee,Thy discontent thou didst bequeath to me.-- Wm Shakespeare

I head out to the bar later and the news mentions something about Westerville & an "upper albany" development, I got a little scared

Trait #6: Priority by semantic content, tags, keywords or topic…

why is october always such a crazy month weather wise in ohio? I’ve only lived here five years, so I’m still not used to it.

I hear that John Smithwas lookingfor his sister

who was missing

Are you folksdiscussingthe strangeweather? I

hear there’sa tornado watch in

grove city. My cousin

has a housethere.

thank god I live within the beltway. I was thinking of a drive out to pick olives for an omlett. With butter. Have you ever tried

*Yup- thanks for thinking of me... I was downtown when all the sirens started last night, but all I heard was that it was grove city

there is a tornado warning for the franks county area ‘til 7:30. *Yeah, columbus parts the weather like the red sea.

Good of you to drop by weatherwatchers.

Here verbiage is deliberately shown spilling out of the text box, illustrating the scrolling problem. How to maintain the “gist” of what other people say, when older statements rapidly vanish out the top? Can online discourse track earlier statements?

Can system help detect what’s urgent, take gist notes, sift noise?Even in faraway speech?

Separating each speaker only partly solves the “dilemma of “chat.” We must also provide tools for smart transcripting.

We solve all of these problems in real life conversation!Shouldn’t online conversation spaces aid discourse, as well?

We solve all of these problems in real life conversation!Shouldn’t online conversation spaces aid discourse, as well?

How to appreciate & “memorize” useful info, while remaining compact?

Page 42: How the Net Betrays Discourse

I head 2 the bar later & the paper

news … re Westerville & an "upper albany" development…got a little scared …

Has anyone heard bout power outages? This lightning is crazy. Lots of multiple flashes.Ironically I’m near downtown and it’s already clearing up.

oct = crazy month weather wise n OH?…lm not used 2 it.

“I weep for thee”(poem link)

W.Shakespeare

tornado watch in grove city

…blah…blah…omlette…

Yup- thx 4 thinking of me. I was

dntown when sirens started last nite, but all I heard was that it was grove city ….

- a tornado warning for franklin county ‘til 7:30.

- CMH parts the weather like red sea.

John Smith…sister missing

Good of you to drop by weatherwatchers.

Smart services notice a quotation. Many other services.

Semantic content, text, gisting & services emulate the power of real brains…

Transcript zoneTranscript zonealso notepads etcalso notepads etc

Shouldn’t you be able to go BACK and recall what someone said earlier?Memory assistance services are represented here by a simple scroller.

Semantic alert: someone far away (even in another world?) is discussing something important to you!

Simple gisting: font ageing, remove low-pri words

User’s own words. Issue of whether they should use up screen space in center…

Let’s solve the problems from the previous screen.Let’s solve the problems from the previous screen.

Page 43: How the Net Betrays Discourse

Real Life suggests Additional Services …

Hey!

Action cellAction cell

Action cellFind andcorrect

problem 17

Action cellFind andcorrect

problem 17

Suggest this alteration

Suggest this alteration

flow chart addendum Xz1flow chart addendum Xz1

Service Kiosk

courtesy: attention cues

World servicesWeb or PhoneSearch Game-play(kiosks do exist on some avatar worlds)

Action cellAction cell

“Bricki” project whiteboarding:Both synchronous meeting andasynchronous collaboration.

kiosks

Privacy/deflection

Also: VOIP, video, analytic tools, self-cloning, teleportation…

…all the way to new-style game methods, environments, formalisms…

…and rapid Augmented Reality overlays.

Also: VOIP, video, analytic tools, self-cloning, teleportation…

…all the way to new-style game methods, environments, formalisms…

…and rapid Augmented Reality overlays.

Smart-Transcript encompasses only chosen members: many gisting styles.

I agree with I agree with youyou … …

……but not with but not with youyou!!

filefile

Exchange files/itemsExchange files/items

Helpful “natural forces”Helpful “natural forces”

Iteration #12Iteration #12

Page 44: How the Net Betrays Discourse
Page 45: How the Net Betrays Discourse

Conclusion: We deserve better

from the Net

Page 46: How the Net Betrays Discourse

Our meandering path.

Tech advances in VisionMemoryAttention

disrupt civilization, provoking Crises of Confidence.

Civilization passed every test by empowering people to apply reciprocal accountability. And with new tools for problem solving.

21st Century Problem Solving requires:

Art

Shake assumptions and the status quo.

21st century toolsVisualizationSimulation

GamesOpenness

Anticipation

Leaders foreseedangers/opportunities.

21st century toolsAnalytics

Modeling & CorrelationData gatheringAccountability

Resilience

Citizens are robust.Respond well to surprise

21st century toolsAgile communication

Self-organizationDispersed expertise

TransparencyRefutation

Confidence

Discourse

We argue, discuss, persuade & improve.

21st century tools

analytic toolsdispute resolutionBetter interface!

Happening! Desperately needed!

Page 47: How the Net Betrays Discourse

Further reading:

PROBLEMS:PROBLEMS:

Runaway progress and " singularities": http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000EOU4RQ

The effectiveness of resilient citizenry:http://www.futurist.com/portal/future_trends/david_brin_empowerment.htm

An emerging “caste conflict” between professionals & amateurs: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000BY2PRQ

War, Interdependence, and Nanotechnologyhttp://www.futurebrief.com/miketrederwar002.asp

The Democratization of violence: http://www.indcjournal.com/archives/000402.php

Security implications of climate change: http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/001480.php#more

SOLUTIONS:SOLUTIONS:

The “Holocene Tool Set” for improving online communications:http://www.holocenechat.com

“Accountability arenas” and improving discourse online:http://www.davidbrin.com/disputationarticle1.html

Anticipatory ‘prediction’ as a credibility-measuring tool:http://www.davidbrin.com/predictionsregistry.html

Or drop by http://www.davidbrin.com

© 2008 David Brin