17
© Fraunhofer ISE GRID INTEGRATION OF PV Dr.-Ing. Bernhard Wille-Haussmann Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE 6th PV Performance Modeling and Monitoring Workshop 24 th October 2016

Grid Integration of PV

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

© Fraunhofer ISE

GRID INTEGRATION OF PV

Dr.-Ing. Bernhard Wille-Haussmann

Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE

6th PV Performance Modeling and

Monitoring Workshop

24th October 2016

© Fraunhofer ISE

2

AGENDA

The Challenge

Solutions for grid integration

Grid planning with renewables

Conclusion

© Fraunhofer ISE

3

What is the challenge for grid integration? And its classical solution

decreasing of line impedance ZL

voltage band v iolations thermal limitations

U1 ΔU I I U2

ZL

U2 = U1 – ZLI voltage decrease

U2 = U1 + ZLI voltage increase

~

vo

lta

ge

Current lead to heating of cable

Increase cross section of cable

© Fraunhofer ISE

4

By pass lines

Trafo change

Additional lines

OLTC

DSM

Q-Control

Line change

Existing grid

Cost data

Cost optimal grid

Optimal grid expansion Avoid grid reinforcement

Feed-in restricti

on

© Fraunhofer ISE

5

PV-Battery Systems

Local self consumption of electricity from PV

Grid oriented operation

electricity

Operation of Local Systems

Electric thermal systems

Thermal storages offer the possibility to decouple thermal and electric processes

CHP HP

electricity

What are services for the Smart Grid?

© Fraunhofer ISE

6

Grid-friendly operation of PV battery systems

Feed-in peak max. 60% PPV

Self consumption optimized

Grid friendly

Self consumption optimization

does not avoid grid peaks

Grid friendly operation: up to 66%

surplus PV can be installed.

© Fraunhofer ISE

7

External Feed-in Reduction requests Electricity grids are increasingly stressed

Increasing feed-in of fluctuating renewables affects grids operation

Feed-in management becomes more important

Decentralized feed-in of renewables influences dimensioning of electricity grids.

This energy can be used better instead of shutting off.

source: EWE NETZ GmbH

Eisman-Einsätze

requests from outside

requests inside EWE NETZ

© Fraunhofer ISE

8

Integration: reactive power control

Voltage will be stabilized by changing the phase between voltage and current.

Increasing of inverter nominal power

Increasing of losses

Reactive power control is defined in grid connection guidelines.

© Fraunhofer ISE

9

Integration: voltage control with tap changer

Usage of variable tap-changer at transformer

Dynamic adaptation of voltage a point of connection

Usage of the full voltage range

No reduction of PV necessary.

source: Maschinenfabrik Reinhausen

© Fraunhofer ISE

10

The planning process of a local DSO

Calculating grid load

Testing measures

Economical evaluation

Grid planning GIS System

Data Export

Import changes

2

3

1

© Fraunhofer ISE

11

Expected Development

Decentralized production

Photovoltaic: 180 kWp

Combined heat: 0 kW

Heat

Needed heat: 50 MWh

Heatpump 50 %

Storage per HP 3 h

Electrical Storages

EV: 0

PV-batteries: 0 kWh

NEMO Use Case – Reference Ringkøbing Step 1: Problem

PV Distribution

HP Distribution

2

© Fraunhofer ISE

12

NEMO Use Case – Reference Ringkøbing Step 2: Identifikation

Voltage Transformer load

Heatpumps dominate

Low voltages

Winter: high trafo load by HP

Summer: Inversed power flow because of PV

2

© Fraunhofer ISE

13

NEMO Use Case – Reference Ringkøbing Step 3: Definition of possible solutions

Solution poss ibilities

Grid reinforcement

conventional

OLTC

Q-Control

Intelligent Control

Demand Side Management

Local energy management

grid friendly PV

2

© Fraunhofer ISE

14

NEMO Use Case– Reference Ringkøbing Step 4: Solution with convention reinforcement

Starting point Expansion

Conventional reinforcement

Replace cables : 1,1 km NAYY 4x240

Change transformer: 400 kVA

* 1km NAYY240 57.000€ (inkl. Verlegung) Transformator 400 kVA: 9.000 €

2

© Fraunhofer ISE

15

NEMO Use Case– Reference Ringkøbing Step 5: Solution with Demand Side Management

Ausbau

Demand Side Management

Reducing peak load : 220 kW 170 kW

Replace cables: 0,3 km NAYY 4x240

Change transformer: not necessary

Haushalt Wärmepumpe Photovoltaik

Haushalt Wärmepumpe Photovoltaik

Status Quo Demand Side Management

* 1km NAYY240 57.000€ (inkl. Verlegung) Transformator 400 kVA: 9.000 €

2

© Fraunhofer ISE

16

Conclusion

Decentralized generation can lead to

Violations of voltage bands

Violation of thermal restriction

Beside conventional reinforcement

Energy Management

Low voltage on load tap changers

Reactive power control

Gird planning has become a multi criteria optimization problem.

© Fraunhofer ISE

17

Thank You!

Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE

Dr.-Ing. Bernhard Wille-Haussmann

www.ise.fraunhofer.de

[email protected]