39
Session 308: Process Maturity Assessments Done Right

Fusion2012 DRDC case study

  • Upload
    it-

  • View
    751

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Fusion2012で実施された講演の資料です。ISO/IEC 15504ベースのプロセスアセスメントのフレームワークである、TIPA®をカナダの政府系機関DRDCに導入した事例についての説明があります。

Citation preview

Page 1: Fusion2012 DRDC case study

Session  308:    Process  Maturity  Assessments  Done  Right  

Page 2: Fusion2012 DRDC case study

Ge;ng  ITIL®  Process  Maturity    Assessment  done  right  

Copyright  ©  2011  ITpreneurs    

!   Using  TIPA  to  drive  IT  transforma=on  at  a  Government  Organiza=on  (v1.1)  

Presenter:  Steve  Tremblay,  PMP,  CGEIT,  ITIL®  Master,  ISO/IEC  20000  &  27002,  TIPA  Lead  Assessor  

[email protected],  +1-­‐613-­‐699-­‐3005  

Page 3: Fusion2012 DRDC case study

!  History  of  Process  Evalua=on  –  Quality  of  Service  !   ISO/IEC  15504  –  Process  Evalua=on  Standard  !   ITIL®  Process  Maturity  Evalua=on  with  TIPA  !  Case  Study  –  DRDC  TIPA  Maturity  Assessment  !  Why  TIPA  

Agenda  

Copyright  ©  2012  ITpreneurs  

ITIL®  is  a  registered  Trademark  of  the  Office  of  Government  Commerce  in  the  United  Kingdom  and  other  countries.    TIPA®  is  an  ini=a=ve  of  the  Centre  de  Recherche  Public  Henri  Tudor.  

Page 4: Fusion2012 DRDC case study

HISTORY  OF  PROCESS  EVALUATION  Quality  in  Service  

Copyright  ©  2012  ITpreneurs  

Page 5: Fusion2012 DRDC case study

Quality  Q

Requirements  for  Quality  

Customer  focus  

Senior  Management  

Buy-­‐In  

Strategy  and  Planning  

(approach  to  decision  making)  

Right  People  Competent,  aware  &  trained  

Mutually  beneficial  supplier  

rela=onship  Process  approach  

Assessment  of  results  

Con=nual  Improvement  

Good  communica=on  

Product Service

« Quality in a product or service is not what the supplier puts in. It is what the customer gets out and is willing to pay for. » Quality – Peter Drucker

Copyright  ©  2012  ITpreneurs  

Page 6: Fusion2012 DRDC case study

!   A  service  is  provided  by  the  interac=on  of  the  service  provider  with  customers  and  users:  –  Quality  of  service  depends  on  this  interac=on  

!   Service  quality  is  an  assessment  of  the  ability  to  meet  the  explicit  needs  and  implicit  requirements  of  customers  or  users:  –  Explicit  needs:  they  are  expressed  by  the  user  or  iden=fied  by  

the  provider  –  Implicit  requirements:  they  are  regulatory,  ethical,  security,  

economic,  technical  and  interpersonal  skills  !   The  service  provider  should  con=nually  assess  the  

performance  of  the  service  and  what  the  client  expects  for  the  future  –  The  customer  percep=on  of  service  quality  may  vary  over  =me  

What  is  Quality  and  Quality  of  Service?  

Copyright  ©  2010  ITpreneurs  

"Service  quality  is  a  measure  that  indicates  the  total  effect  of  the  execu8on  of  the  service  that  determines  the  degree  of  sa8sfac8on  of  a  beneficiary.  The  measurement  results  from  the  resource  capacity  to  offer  different  levels  of  service.  The  measure  may  be  quan8ta8ve  and  qualita8ve.  “   Sources: AFNOR ISO 8402

Page 7: Fusion2012 DRDC case study

Copyright  ©  2012  ITpreneurs  

Quality  Management  System  Strategy  

Policies  

Objec=ves  

Processes  

People  

Tools  

Page 8: Fusion2012 DRDC case study

!  Assessment  as  part  of  an  improvement  process  –  Arrange  results  on  a  ra=ng  scale  –  "Bojom-­‐up"  Approach  –  Voluntary  and  par=cipatory  –  Research  strengths  and  opportuni=es,  weaknesses  and  threats  

–  Iden=fica=on  of  recommenda=ons  –  Founda=on  to  ini=ate  an  improvement  program  

Why  assessing  processes?  

Copyright  ©  2012  ITpreneurs  

Page 9: Fusion2012 DRDC case study

PROCESS  EVALUATION  STANDARD  ISO/IEC  15504    

Copyright  ©  2012  ITpreneurs  

Page 10: Fusion2012 DRDC case study

!   ISO/IEC  15504  is  the  reference  model  for  the  maturity  models  (consis=ng  of  capability  levels  which  in  turn  consist  of  the  process  ajributes  and  further  consist  of  generic  prac=ces)  against  which  the  assessors  can  place  the  evidence  that  they  collect  during  their  assessment,  so  that  the  assessors  can  give  an  overall  determina=on  of  the  organiza=on's  capabili=es  for  delivering  products  (sonware,  systems,  and  IT  services).  

ISO/IEC  15504  

Copyright  ©  2012  ITpreneurs  

Page 11: Fusion2012 DRDC case study

Process  Reference  Model  and    Process  Assessment  Model  in  ISO/IEC  15504  

Copyright  ©  2012  ITpreneurs  

Page 12: Fusion2012 DRDC case study

Process  Maturity  Levels  and  ISO/IEC  15504  

5  OPTIMIZING  (Con=nuous  Improvement)  5.1  Process  Innova=on  5.2  Process  Op=miza=on  

4  PREDICTABLE  (Quan=ta=vely  Managed)  4.1  Process  Measurement  4.2  Process  Control  

3  ESTABLISHED  (Well  Defined)  3.1  Process  Defini=on  3.2  Process  Deployment  

2  MANAGED  (Planned  and  Monitored)  2.1  Performance  Management  2.2  Work  Product  Management  

1  PERFORMED  (Informal)    1.1Process  Performance  

0  INCOMPLETE    

 Process  Maturity  Levels  and  Process  ALributes-­‐ISO/IEC  15504      

!    ISO  standard  for  Process  Assessment  !    Also  known  as  SPICE  !    Standard  gaining  prominence  in            recent  years  !  TIPA  maps  each  process  onto  the    scale  set  by  the  ISO/IEC  15504              standard  

 

ISO/IEC  15504  

Page 13: Fusion2012 DRDC case study

ITIL®  PROCESS  MATURITY  EVALUATION  Using  TIPA  for  conduc=ng  an  

Copyright  ©  2012  ITpreneurs  

Page 14: Fusion2012 DRDC case study

Introduc=on  to  TIPA    TIPA  (Tudor  IT  Process  Assessment)  is  an  internaUonally-­‐recognized  framework  for  IT  process  assessment  that  uses  the  principles  of  ISO/IEC  15504  standard  in  order  to  determine  the  maturity  level  of  IT  processes  within  an  organizaUon  

ITIL®  

ISO/IEC  15504  

+   TIPA  for  ITIL®  

!   Applica=on  of  the  ISO/IEC  15504              to  ITIL®    !   IT  Process  Maturity  

determina=on  !   The  first  step  towards  ITSM  

improvement  !   Structured,  objec=ve,  repeatable  

assessment  

Copyright  ©  2012  ITpreneurs  

Page 15: Fusion2012 DRDC case study

An  Ini=a=ve  of  CRP  Henri  Tudor  CRP  Henri  Tudor  in  Luxembourg  has  been  contribuUng  to  the  improvement  and  strengthening  of  the  innovaUon  in  enterprises  and  public  organizaUons.  

•  Largest  public  research  center  in  Luxembourg  

•  Staff  of  450  researchers  •  Applied  research  only  •  Experts  involved  in  many  ISO  

standards  •  TIPA  is  the  result  of  more  than  7  

years  of  dedicated  research  

Copyright  ©  2012  ITpreneurs  

Page 16: Fusion2012 DRDC case study

Copyright  ©  2012  ITpreneurs  

TIPA  -­‐  A  turnkey  solu=on  for  IT  Process  Assessment  from  defini=on  to  closure  

Page 17: Fusion2012 DRDC case study

TIPA  -­‐  An  important  step    in  IT  process  improvement  ini=a=ve  

TIPA  IniUal  assessment  

DefiniUon  of  improvement  plan,  goals    and  milestones  

ImplementaUon  

TIPA  Control  Assessment  

§   Improve  Service  Quality  §   Get  a  beLer  ROI  on  ITSM          projects  § Reduce  cost  

 

Copyright  ©  2012  ITpreneurs  

Page 18: Fusion2012 DRDC case study

Copyright  ©  2011  ITpreneurs  

Overview  of  TIPA  tools  

Page 19: Fusion2012 DRDC case study

Overview  of  TIPA  Result  –  Process  profile  in  an  organiza=on  

Level 1Performed

Process Performance

Performance Management

Work Product Management

Process Definition

Process Deployment

Process Measurement

Process Control

Process Innovation

Process Optimisation

Incident Management F L L P P

Change Management F F L L L

Release Management F F P N N

Configuration Management F F F L L

Problem Management L P P N N

Legend Rates "Fully" F Not Assessed

"Largely" L "Partially" P

"Not" N

Level 5Optimising

Project XYZLevel 2

ManagedLevel 3

EstablishedLevel 4

Predictable

Copyright  ©  2012  ITpreneurs  

Process  A    

Process  B    

Process  C    

Process  D    

Process  E  

Page 20: Fusion2012 DRDC case study

CASE  STUDY  Introduc=on  to  the  Defense  Research  and  Development  Canada  (DRDC)  

Copyright  ©  2012  ITpreneurs  

Page 21: Fusion2012 DRDC case study

Where  do  you  stand?  

•  How  many  of  you  have  assessed  the  maturity  of  you  IT  processes  in  the  past  or  recently?  

•  How  many  of  you  actually  know  your  current  maturity  level  for  your  IT  processes?  

•  How  many  of  you  are  working  on  an  improvement  project  resul=ng  from  an  IT  maturity  assessment?  

•  How  many  of  you  are  planning  to  reassess  your  IT  process  maturity  at  regular  intervals?  

Copyright  ©  2012  ITpreneurs  

Page 22: Fusion2012 DRDC case study

!  DRDC  is  a  Canadian  Federal  Government  organiza=on  that  is  Canada’s  leader  in  defense  and  security  science  and  technology  (S&T)  in  an  ever–evolving  defense  and  security  environment.  

!  They  have  chosen  TIPA  as  the  methodology  of  choice  for  conduc=ng  a  process  maturity  assessment  as  part  of  a  major  IT  transforma=on  project  to  improve  the  Agency’s  capability  to  bejer  support,  innovate,  and  react  to  IT  changes.  

DRDC  –  The  organiza=on  

Copyright  ©  2012  ITpreneurs  

Page 23: Fusion2012 DRDC case study

1.  Methodology  specific  for  ITIL®-­‐based  processes  2.  Determine  the  current  state  of  IT  infrastructure  

and  processes  3.  Develop  a  future  state  of  IT  and  the  services  it  

needs  to  provide  4.  Architect  a  roadmap  that  depicts  how  to  get  to  

the  desired  state  from  the  current  one  5.  Determine  the  steps  needed  to  execute  the  

roadmap  6.  Repeat  the  assessment  with  consistent  results  

DRDC  Requirements  

Copyright  ©  2012  ITpreneurs  

Page 24: Fusion2012 DRDC case study

1.  ITIL®-­‐based  –>  TIPA  was  built  specific  to  ITIL®  2.  Current  state  –>  Ques=onnaires    3.  Future  state  –>  Sponsor  /  Business  

understanding  4.  A  roadmap  –>  SWOT  5.  Steps  to  execute  –>  Analysis  6.  Repeatable  &  Consistent  –>  PAM  

How  TIPA  helped  meet  DRDC’s  ini=al  requirements  

Copyright  ©  2012  ITpreneurs  

Page 25: Fusion2012 DRDC case study

!  Provided  the  vision  (direc=on)  and  roadmap  !  Offers  a  guide  on  the  exact  process  requirements,  expected  results,  inputs  and  outputs  (contribu8ng  to  be@er  process  integra8on)  

!  Short  to  medium  term  -­‐  confirming  the  achievement  of  their  vision  

!   In  the  longer  term,  TIPA  will  help  maintaining  the  alignment  to  the  vision  and/or  contribute  to  adjust  the  vision  and  the  roadmap  to  con=nual  improvement  

How  TIPA  is  expected  to  meet  DRDC’s  short,  medium  and  long  term  requirements  

Copyright  ©  2012  ITpreneurs  

Page 26: Fusion2012 DRDC case study

!  Provided  a  clear  view  of  the  current  situa=on    !  Focused  on  “what”  not  on  “how”  !  Facilitated  improvement  (Roadmap  aligned  to  the  business  vision  and  needs,  thus  more  focused  and  more  cost  efficient)  

!  Reinforced  mo=va=on  to  set  up  ITIL®  processes  

!  Proposed  a  clear  way  for  presen=ng  results:  Process  Profile,  Report,  and  Presenta=ons  

Case  Study  Conclusion  

Copyright  ©  2012  ITpreneurs  

Page 27: Fusion2012 DRDC case study

WHY  TIPA?  

Copyright  ©  2012  ITpreneurs  

Page 28: Fusion2012 DRDC case study

Values  and  Benefits  of  TIPA  !   Offers  a  vendor-­‐neutral,  structured  and  repeatable              evaluaUon  method  !   Enables  process  improvement  through  goal-­‐se;ng  &            objecUve  measurement  

-­‐  Keeping  staff  moUvated  by  establishing  milestones  -­‐  Improving  ROI  on  ITSM  projects  

!   Allows  standardizaUon  to  compare  process-­‐maturity            with  other  organizaUons        

For  end-­‐user  organizaUons  

where  assessments  are  

performed  

For  consultants  and  organizaUons  who  perform  assessments  

!   Offers  a  turnkey  soluUon  for  a  solid  assessment                framework  and  supporUng  tools  !   A  standard  for  process-­‐benchmarking  without  adopUng            a  compeUtor  framework    

Copyright  ©  2012  ITpreneurs  

Page 29: Fusion2012 DRDC case study

Other  TIPA  Projects  Dimension  Data  

Used  TIPA  in  4  of  their  5  global    service  centers  around  the  world  for:  !   Benchmarking  &  iden=fica=on  of  

best  prac=ces  !   Improving  processes  

Fujitsu  Services  Oy  (Finland)  Has  used  TIPA  since  2007  !   Make  about  10  assessments  per  

year  to  follow  different  projects  !   Use  it  for  process  improvement  and  

to  demonstrate  to  customers  that  they  do  their  best  to  serve  them  

CARRA  (Quebec,  Canada)  Used  TIPA  in  their  organiza=on  for:  !   Benchmarking  &  iden=fica=on  of  

of  pain  points  !   Iden=fica=on  of  the  areas  to  

build  upon  !   Improving  processes  !   Ini=a=ng  an  RFP  for  

improvement  work  

KVH  (Japan)  Their  expecta=ons  were:  !   Process  purposes  &  results  met  !   Consistent  assessment  results  !   Not  only  a  PASS  or  FAIL  !   Global  standard  framework  !   Possibility  to  benchmark  with  

compe=tors  

Copyright  ©  2012  ITpreneurs  

Page 30: Fusion2012 DRDC case study

QUESTIONS  

Copyright  ©  2012  ITpreneurs  

!   Steve  Tremblay,  President  !   Excelsa  Technologies  Consul=ng  Inc.  !   +1-­‐613-­‐699-­‐3005  ! [email protected]    ! www.excelsatech.com    

Page 31: Fusion2012 DRDC case study

ADDITIONAL  INFORMATION  

Copyright  ©  2012  ITpreneurs  

Page 32: Fusion2012 DRDC case study

More  Informa=on  !   Official  website:  www.=paonline.org  

!   Contact  Arjan  Woertman:  [email protected]    

!   TIPA  reference  book  from  Van  Haren:  ITSM Process Assessment Suppor=ng ITIL®                  (available  at  hjp://bit.ly/hx6t9g  )  

!   TIPA  is  an  ini=a=ve  of  Public  Research  Center  Henri  Tudor  in  Luxembourg                  (hjp://www.tudor.lu)  

!   TIPA  Training  and  Consul=ng  Services:  www.excelsatech.com    

Copyright  ©  2012  ITpreneurs  

Page 33: Fusion2012 DRDC case study

Appendix  1:  TIPA  Process  Assesment  Overview  

TIPA  Process  Assessment  

The  TIPA  Ra=ng  Scale  

The  Process  Profile  

The  Assessment  Report  

Presenta=on  of  the  

Assessment  Results  

Assessment    v/s  Audit  

Experiencing  the  TIPA  

Ra=ng  Scale  

Copyright  ©  2012  ITpreneurs  

Page 34: Fusion2012 DRDC case study

Appendix  2:  TIPA  Ra=ng  Scale    

–  During  an  assessment,  each  item  is  rated  as  “N,”  “P,”  “L,”  “F,”  or  “N.A.”  

0%              15%  16%                                                  50%  51%                                                85%  86%                    100%  

Not  Achieved  

ParUally  Achieved  

 

Largely  Achieved  

Fully  Achieved  

L  P  N   F  

Copyright  ©  2012  ITpreneurs  

Page 35: Fusion2012 DRDC case study

Appendix  3  –  Process  Profile  Level 1

Performed Level 2

Managed Level 3

Established Level 4

Predictable Process

Performance Performance Management

Work Product Management

Process Definition

Process Deployment

Process Measurement Process Control

F L P P P

Legend Level Achieved Level Not Achieved Not Assessed

Change Management

F  

L  

P  

N  

N.A  

Legend “Fully”

“Largely”

Partially”

Not”

Not Assessed Not Applicable

Rates

Level 1 Performed

Level 2 Managed

Level 3 Established

Level 4 Predictable

Level 5 Optimizing

Change Management

Copyright  ©  2012  ITpreneurs  

Page 36: Fusion2012 DRDC case study

Copyright  ©  2012  ITpreneurs  

Appendix  4:  Assessment  Report    

The Assessment Report:

Is  the  main  output  of  an  assessment  project.  

Is  produced  during  the  Results  Presenta=on  Phase  of  a  TIPA  project.    

Records  the  results  of  the  assessment  project.  

Shows  the  Process  Profile  of  each  assessed  process.  

Contains  the  SWOT  of  each  process.  

Summarizes  the  Improvement  Recommenda=ons.  

Page 37: Fusion2012 DRDC case study

TIPA  Cer=fica=on  

TIPA  Lead  Assessor  

TIPA  Assessor(s)  

!   Is  the  project  manager  of  the  TIPA  assessment  project  and  leads  the  team  of  ‘TIPA  Assessors  for  ITIL®’  

 

!   Leads  the  project  from  the  selec=on  of  the  processes  to  be  assessed  to  the  presenta=on  of  the  assessment  results  

CerUfied TIPA  Lead  Assessor  

CerUfied  TIPA  Assessor  for  ITIL®  !   Conducts  the  assessment  interviews    

!   Rates  processes  according  to  the  ra=ng  sheets  provided  in  the  TIPA  Toolbox    

!   Analyses  the  results  to  draw  conclusions  on  process  maturity  

Roles  in  a  TIPA  team    conducUng  an  assessment    

Copyright  ©  2012  ITpreneurs  

Page 38: Fusion2012 DRDC case study

Copyright  ©  2010  ITpreneurs  

TIPA  Membership  

   

OrganizaUons  where  IT  Process  

assessments  are  performed  OrganizaUonal  Members  For  organiza=ons  that  offer  

products  or  services  based  on  TIPA  commercially  (e.g.:  Consul=ng  

firms,  IT  Service  Providers,  Sonware  development  firms).  Organiza=onal  members  may  employ  or  contract  

TIPA  professional  members  

     

Professional  Members  For  cer=fied  TIPA  Assessors  and  Lead  Assessors  who  want  to  

par=cipate  or  lead    assessments  

   

TIPA  membership  allows  individuals  and  organizaUons  to  become  part  of  a  global  network  of  TIPA  pracUUoners,  who  use  the  framework  commercially.  The  scheme  ensures  that  the  TIPA  governing  body  led  by  CRP  Henri  Tudor  addresses  the  needs  of  members  and  delivers  the  latest  TIPA  updates  to  them.  

TIPA  governing  body:    CRP  Henri  Tudor  

Page 39: Fusion2012 DRDC case study

Thank  you  for  ajending  this  session.      Don’t  forget  to  complete  the  evalua=on!    

Copyright  ©  2012  ITpreneurs