4
FORMATE MATTERS Issue no. 10 – March/April 2016 NEWS AND OPINION FROM CABOT CORPORATION cabotcorp.com/cesiumformate NEW STUDY: SAVE WEEKS DRILLING AND COMPLETING WITH FORMATE FLUIDS ABOUT RIDGE Ridge AS, formerly Subsurface AS, is an independent consulting company headquartered in Norway with one of the largest HPHT well engineering teams in the country. Ridge provides well and completion support for many ongoing field developments in the North Sea and is Achilles JQS registered. Page 2 Join our workshops Page 3 Life of brine Page 4 Full-scale testing reveals ROP enhancing properties of formate brines Page 4 Site unseen? Win a Parrot drone! READ ON We engaged Ridge AS to undertake an independent benchmarking study of how different well construction fluids in combination with common drilling and completion strategies affect rig time. The study of 56 high-pressure high-temperature (HPHT) wells and 33 non-HPHT wells provides a database for helping predict construction times for comparative well developments. Fastest vs. slowest Open-hole standalone sand screen (OH SAS) completions are faster than C&P completions, but fluid choice plays a crucial role in optimising operations and saving further time and costs. In fact, switching from C&P completions using OBMs to OH SAS with formate fluids saves over three and a half weeks of rig time (see figure, p. 3). Formate fluids also significantly speed up both well completion techniques. Ridge calculates: 17 days of rig-time savings in C&P wells – compare scenarios 3 and 5 in figure 13 days of rig-time savings in wells completed in simple OH SAS – compare scenarios 1 and 2 in figure Best-practice drilling Ridge compares drilling time for operations completed with OBMs versus those using formate fluids and concludes: “It is evident that wells drilled with cesium/potassium formate are significantly faster than wells drilled with OBM.” The report then asks ‘why?’ Ridge provides several reasons for formate fluids’ improved performance based on a comprehensive literature review and findings from the benchmarking study: Longer bit runs and improved rate of penetration (ROP). Average ROP with formate fluids is 74% higher for HPHT platform wells, 38% higher for HPHT subsea wells and 68% higher for non- HPHT subsea wells. Formate fluids provide lower equivalent circulating densities (ECDs), eliminate risk of barite sag, improve borehole stability, provide better kick detection and minimise time to circulate out gas. Fewer wiper trips due to stable mud properties and elimination of sag. Less mud conditioning with formate fluids compared to OBMs. Faster and fewer flow checks. Improved hole cleaning in horizontal wells – lower ECDs permit higher pump rates and more turbulent flow. Pumps ramp up much quicker after connections without ECD-spike risk, due to fragile gels in formate fluids. Faster tripping through lower ECDs and larger swab/surge margins. Reduced tool failures through better cooling in formate fluids. A new benchmarking study of 89 North Sea wells proves rig-time savings of up to 26 days when the optimum combination of well construction strategy and fluid type is chosen. Cesium and potassium formate fluids perform better than oil-based muds (OBMs) in both open-hole and cased and perforated (C&P) well constructions. According to Ridge’s study, formate fluids deliver significant increases in ROP – 74% higher for HPHT platform wells, 38% higher for HPHT subsea wells and 68% higher for non-HPHT subsea wells Continued on page 3

Formate Matters Newsletter -Issue 10 - March 2016

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Formate Matters Newsletter -Issue 10 -  March 2016

FORMATE MATTERSIssue no. 10 – March/April 2016 NEWS AND OPINION FROM CABOT CORPORATION cabotcorp.com/cesiumformate

NEW STUDY: SAVE WEEKS DRILLING AND COMPLETING WITH FORMATE FLUIDS

ABOUT RIDGE

Ridge AS, formerly Subsurface AS, is an independent consulting company headquartered in Norway with one of the largest HPHT well engineering teams in the country. Ridge provides well and completion support for many ongoing field developments in the North Sea and is Achilles JQS registered.

Page 2 Join our workshops

Page 3 Life of brine

Page 4 Full-scale testing reveals ROP enhancing properties of formate brines

Page 4 Site unseen? Win a Parrot drone!

READ ON

We engaged Ridge AS to undertake an independent benchmarking study of how different well construction fluids in combination with common drilling and completion strategies affect rig time. The study of 56 high-pressure high-temperature (HPHT) wells and 33 non-HPHT wells provides a database for helping predict construction times for comparative well developments.

Fastest vs. slowestOpen-hole standalone sand screen (OH SAS) completions are faster than C&P completions, but fluid choice plays a crucial role in optimising operations and saving further time and costs. In fact, switching from C&P completions using OBMs to OH SAS with formate fluids saves over three and a half weeks of rig time (see figure, p. 3).

Formate fluids also significantly speed up both well completion techniques. Ridge calculates:

17 days of rig-time savings in C&P wells – compare scenarios 3 and 5 in figure

13 days of rig-time savings in wells completed in simple OH SAS – compare scenarios 1 and 2 in figure

Best-practice drillingRidge compares drilling time for operations completed with OBMs versus those using formate fluids and concludes: “It is evident that wells drilled with cesium/potassium formate are significantly faster than wells drilled with OBM.” The report then asks ‘why?’

Ridge provides several reasons for formate fluids’ improved performance based on a comprehensive literature review and findings from the benchmarking study: Longer bit runs and improved rate of

penetration (ROP). Average ROP with formate fluids is 74% higher for HPHT platform wells, 38% higher for HPHT subsea wells and 68% higher for non-HPHT subsea wells.

Formate fluids provide lower equivalent circulating densities (ECDs), eliminate risk of barite sag, improve borehole stability, provide better kick detection and minimise time to circulate out gas.

Fewer wiper trips due to stable mud properties and elimination of sag.

Less mud conditioning with formate fluids compared to OBMs.

Faster and fewer flow checks. Improved hole cleaning in horizontal

wells – lower ECDs permit higher pump rates and more turbulent flow.

Pumps ramp up much quicker after connections without ECD-spike risk, due to fragile gels in formate fluids.

Faster tripping through lower ECDs and larger swab/surge margins.

Reduced tool failures through better cooling in formate fluids.

A new benchmarking study of 89 North Sea wells proves rig-time savings of up to 26 days when the optimum combination of well construction strategy and fluid type is chosen. Cesium and potassium formate fluids perform better than oil-based muds (OBMs) in both open-hole and cased and perforated (C&P) well constructions.

According to Ridge’s study, formate fluids deliver significant increases in ROP – 74% higher for HPHT platform wells, 38% higher for HPHT subsea wells and 68% higher for non-HPHT subsea wells

Continued on page 3

Page 2: Formate Matters Newsletter -Issue 10 -  March 2016

A2.1 Introduction ..............................

..............................

..............................

..............................

.......4

A2.2 Density of single-salt brines ..............................

..............................

..............................

.......4

A2.2.1 Mixing tables for sodium formate ...............

................................

..............................5

A2.2.2 Mixing tables for potassium formate ...............

................................

........................5

A2.2.3 Mixing tables for cesium formate ...............

................................

..............................5

A2.3 Density of potassium / cesium formate blends .............................

..............................

...5

A2.4 Density of sodium / potassium formate blends .............................

..............................

...6

A2.5 Density, compressibility, and thermal expansion coefficients for

potassium and cesium formate brines and blends ..............................

..........................6

A2.5.1 Software package DensiCalc ...............

................................

................................

.......6

A2.5.2 PVTCalc software ...............

................................

................................

.............................7

References .............................

..............................

..............................

..............................

........................7

The Formate Technical Manual is continually updated.

To check if a newer version of this section exists please visit

cabotcorp.com/formatemanual

SECTION A2

BRINE DENSITY AND PVT DATA

NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER. The data and conclusions contained herein are based on work believed to be reliable; however, CABOT cannot and does not guarantee that similar results and/

or conclusions will be obtained by others. This information is provided as a convenience and for informational purposes only. No guarantee or warranty as to this information, or any

product to which it relates, is given or implied. CABOT DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AS TO (i)

SUCH INFORMATION, (ii) ANY PRODUCT OR (iii) INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INFRINGEMENT. In no event is CABOT responsible for, and CABOT does not accept and hereby disclaims liability for,

any damages whatsoever in connection with the use of or reliance on this information or any product to which it relates.

© 2015 Cabot Corporation, MA, USA. All rights reserved. CABOT is a registered trademark of Cabot Corporation.

VERSION 10 – 05/15

C H E M I C A L A N D P H Y S I C A L P R O P E R T I E SF O R M A T E T E C H N I C A L M A N U A L

C A B O T

A7.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................2

A7.2 Practical importance .................................................................................................................2

A7.3 Coefficient of thermal conductivity ..................................................................................... 3

A7.3.1 Medium temperature range ........................................................................................3

A7.3.2 Lower temperature range (<10°C / 50°F) ...............................................................3

A7.3.3 Higher temperature range (>68°C / 150°F) ...........................................................3

A7.3.4 Pressure dependence ..................................................................................................3

A7.4 Specific heat capacity ............................................................................................................. 4

A7.4.1 Medium temperature range ........................................................................................4

A7.4.2 Lower temperature range (<10°C / 50°F) ...............................................................4

A7.4.3 Higher temperature range (>70°C / 160°F) ...........................................................5

References .................................................................................................................................................. 5

The Formate Technical Manual is continually updated.

To check if a newer version of this section exists please visit

cabotcorp.com/formatemanual

SECTION A7

THERMOPHYSICAL PROPERTIES

NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER. The data and conclusions contained herein are based on work believed to be reliable; however, CABOT cannot and does not guarantee that similar results

and/or conclusions will be obtained by others. This information is provided as a convenience and for informational purposes only. No guarantee or warranty as to this information, or

any product to which it relates, is given or implied. CABOT DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AS TO

(i) SUCH INFORMATION, (ii) ANY PRODUCT OR (iii) INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INFRINGEMENT. In no event is CABOT responsible for, and CABOT does not accept and hereby disclaims liability for,

any damages whatsoever in connection with the use of or reliance on this information or any product to which it relates.

© 2015 Cabot Corporation, MA, USA. All rights reserved. CABOT is a registered trademark of Cabot Corporation.

VERSION 4 – 07/15

C H E M I C A L A N D P H Y S I C A L P R O P E R T I E S

F O R M A T E T E C H N I C A L M A N U A L

C A B O T

B14.1 Introduction .............................

..............................

..............................

..............................

............2

B14.2 Non-aqueous solvents ..............................

..............................

..............................

.....................2

B14.2.1 Alcohols ...............................

................................

................................

...............................2

B14.2.2 Glycol ethers ...............................

................................

................................

......................3

B14.2.3 2-Pyrrolidone ...............................

................................

................................

.....................3

B14.3 Formate solubility in non-aqueous solvents ..............................

..............................

.......... 3

B14.3.1 Sodium formate ...............................

................................

................................

................4

B14.3.2 Potassium formate ...............................

................................

................................

..........4

B14.3.3 Cesium formate ................................

................................

................................

................5

B14.3.4 Conclusions ................................

................................

................................

.......................6

References .............................

..............................

..............................

..............................

........................... 7

The Formate Technical Manual is continually updated.

To check if a newer version of this section exists please visit

cabotcorp.com/formatemanual

SECTION B14

SOLUBILITY IN NON-AQUEOUS SOLVENTS

NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER. The data and conclusions contained herein are based on work believed to be reliable; however, CABOT cannot and does not guarantee that similar results

and/or conclusions will be obtained by others. This information is provided as a convenience and for informational purposes only. No guarantee or warranty as to this information, or

any product to which it relates, is given or implied. CABOT DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AS TO

(i) SUCH INFORMATION, (ii) ANY PRODUCT OR (iii) INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INFRINGEMENT. In no event is CABOT responsible for, and CABOT does not accept and hereby disclaims liability for,

any damages whatsoever in connection with the use of or reliance on this information or any product to which it relates.

© 2015 Cabot Corporation, MA, USA. All rights reserved. CABOT is a registered trademark of Cabot Corporation.

VERSION 2 – 10/15

C O M P A T I B I L I T I E S A N D I N T E R A C T I O N SF O R M A T E T E C H N I C A L M A N U A L

C A B O T

2 – FORMATE MATTERS Issue no. 10 – March/April 2016

JOIN OUR WORKSHOPS

The latest workshops were all run in Asia; Kuala Lumpur, Ho Chi Minh City and, most recently, Nusa Dua in Indonesia. All three focused on best well construction practice with emphasis on HPHT drilling and completion. Subjects included fluid choice, intervention and completion design, well integrity, wellbore stability, performance drilling and formation damage. The keynote speaker at all events was Professor Eric van Oort, Consultant and Chairman of Genesis RTS and Lancaster Professor in Petroleum Engineering at the University of Austin, Texas who presented his current research on wellbore stability and drilling performance that highlighted significant ROP increases in shales with formate fluids. All three workshops enjoyed good industry participation with drilling and completion engineers from oil and gas and service companies such as Petronas, Premier Oil, KPOC, Bien Dong, Cuu Long, Chevron, Saudi Aramco, Scomi and M-I Swaco attending.

Allan Grossart, segment manager oil and gas, says: “We really value the support shown from visitors during the workshops.

They were a great success with constructive and lively debate, and lots of opportunities to network.”

Professor Eric van Oort presenting his latest research. Why not book your own complimentary formate fluids workshop or seminar?

NEW MANUAL UPDATES!

Drilling, completion, intervention and workover applications are well established, but lesser known is its effectiveness as a pill for breaking OBM filter cake, releasing stuck pipe and dissolving hydrates.

Cesium formate brine’s versatility is due to its unique properties, particularly its natural high density and low water activity. With no added solids it is available and fully stable up to 2.3 g/cm3/19.2 lb/gal. As no additives or mixing are needed, cesium formate is brought into play quickly and rig inventory and deck space used for additive storage is greatly reduced.

A typical application where speed is of the essence is differentially stuck pipe. Cesium formate brine works fast downhole disrupting and effectively breaking OBM filter cake.

Additionally, the brine dissolves hydrate plugs. The heavy cesium formate pill is easily spotted on top of a hydrate plug and gravity helps the brine to attack and dissolve the hydrate plug very efficiently.

Cesium formate brine’s monovalent nature and mildly alkaline pH also mean it’s safe to handle. These qualities give it good environmental credentials with a gold rating from the United Kingdom’s Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, and similar approvals from other environmental organisations worldwide.

It all adds up to a highly versatile brine for specific applications or stand-by purposes for those unforeseen events that need a fast response.

DID YOU KNOW?

THE VERSATILITY OF CESIUM FORMATECesium formate has been described as the ‘Swiss army knife’ of brines due to its wide range of uses.

Cesium formate brine quickly disrupts and breaks filter cake to release differentially stuck pipe

What are formate fluids? What are their benefits? Should I consider using them in my next well? What does the latest research show? There are always questions, which is why we hold seminars and workshops to educate and answer the queries that arise. The next workshops are being held in Stavanger and Aberdeen on 15 and 18 April respectively. To reserve your place, please send an email to [email protected]. We also run bespoke events, so if you’d like to instigate a seminar or workshop for your company tailored to your specific needs, please get in touch. There are no costs attached to arranging or attending these events.

Get the latest additions to the formate manual

Our comprehensive formate manual is a live document continually updated with the latest research and knowledge on formate brines. In the last months, A2 Brine density and PVT data, A7 Thermophysical properties and B14 Solubility in non-aqueous solvents have all been renewed, the latter with substantial new material. For your complimentary downloads, please visit cabotcorp.com/formatemanual.

Page 3: Formate Matters Newsletter -Issue 10 -  March 2016

Bring on the brinesJohn joined Shell Chemicals in the 1980s, selling xanthan to the oil industry as a drilling fluid viscosifier. In the meantime, his colleagues in Shell Research discovered great synergy between xanthan and a novel class of clear brines based on sodium formate and potassium formate. These formate brines viscosified with xanthan made excellent solids-free drilling and completion fluids. John took this exciting new technology with him in 1990 when he moved to Shell’s E&P laboratory in the Netherlands as a senior scientist tasked with developing better drilling and completion fluids. John explains: “Back in the 90’s, well drilling fluids were barite-laden slurries from a bygone era that slowed down drilling and

complicated the well construction process. Replacing these old-fashioned slurries with clear formate brines made a lot of sense. They made the entire well drilling and completion process simpler, safer, faster and ultimately cheaper.”

Denser does it John’s immediate challenge was to find some way of increasing formate brines’ density. As potassium formate brine only went up to 1.57 g/cm3/13.1 lb/gal and not beyond, John turned to cesium formate produced by TANCO from its pollucite mine in Manitoba, Canada. His lab tests on cesium formate brine in 1990 showed that densities up to 2.30 g/cm3/19.2lb/gal were possible with this exciting product.

This discovery opened up the possibility of drilling and completing wells entirely with solids-free formate brines.

Formates forever John left Shell in 1995 to promote formate brines in the oil industry, eventually joining Cabot in 2004. Here, he worked in technical sales, marketing and product development concentrating on cesium formate, until setting up his own formate brine consultancy in 2012.

John has published 30 papers on formate brines and is a recipient of the Cabot Lifetime Technology Achievement Award. We wish him a happy and healthy retirement.

Issue no. 10 – March/April 2016 FORMATE MATTERS – 3

Continued from page 1

Completion choiceRidge then studied completion type and fluid choice. Jan Tore Hatland, co-author of the Ridge report, says: “For completion operations, time savings are generally much less intuitive and are, to a much larger extent, related to how various fluids enable more time-efficient completion solutions, rather than direct time savings from the fluids. The study shows that low-solids formate fluids are enablers for the fastest types of completions.”

Ridge observed that OH lower completions are typically delivered significantly faster than C&P completions. Low-solids, formate screen-running fluids enable OH completions and are compatible with clear formate brine in overbalanced upper completions.

Further, the report shows that C&P completions with drill-pipe-conveyed perforation in overbalanced fluid are delivered significantly faster than C&P completions with wireline (WL) or coiled tubing (CT) underbalanced post-completion perforations. This is most likely due to the long rig-up time for CT/WL operations, combined with the limit of perforation guns per run. Low-solids or solids-free formate perforation fluid combined with clear formate brine in upper-completions enable overbalanced tubing-conveyed perforations.

Importantly, Ridge notes that clean-up to

John Downs presenting formate brines in 2008

LIFE OF BRINEJohn Downs, aka ‘the father of formates’, stepped into retirement last year knowing that he has initiated a revolution in well construction fluids. John’s interest in brines dates back more than 40 years. After graduating from Bath University, United Kingdom with a degree in biology in 1973 he joined Shell Research as a fermentation technologist growing bacteria to create products such as xanthan gum. To gain greater control over the fermentation process, John started growing bacteria on clear brines containing all of the bacterial nutrients in soluble form. Production rates increased and John filed his first xanthan patent.

Figure Predicted time to drill and complete an 8.5" HPHT reservoir section with five different configurations/fluids. Times are taken from the benchmarking study results as follows: a) platform well, b) section length (500 m), c) average net ROP (47 m/day for formate fluids and 27 m/day for OBM), d) average completion time (depending on completion type), e) average drill pipe perforation time (three days), f) average WL perforation time (ten days), g) clean-up to rig for OBM (two days).

Where formate fluid is used for drilling-in, lower completions and upper completions, it acts as the primary barrier through all operations.

Pre

dic

ted

dril

ling

an

d c

omp

leti

on t

ime

[day

s]

DIF = Drill-in fluid, LCF = Lower completion fluid, UCF = Upper completion fluid, UB = Under-balanced

18.2

10.6 10.6

18.2

14.4

17.4 17.6

17.6

3

10

10

2

2

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

Scenario 2 OH SAS OBM DIFOBM LCF

– UB UCF

Scenario 3C&P

Formate DIFFormate LCF

DP perforationsFormate UCF

Scenario 4C&P

Formate DIFFormate LCF

WL perforations Formate UCF

Scenario 5 C&P

OBM DIFOBM LCF

WL perforationsUB UCF

Predicted construction times for a 500-metre 8.5" reservoir section

Clean-up

Perforation

Time saved

Completion

Drilling

10.6

12.8days

26days

16.8days

9.6days

11.2

Scenario 1OH SAS

Formate DIFFormate LCF

–Formate UCF

For further information, please email [email protected] or visit cabotcorp.com/cesiumformate to

download a brochure detailing key findings and conclusions from the report.

rig is usually not required when low-solids cesium formate fluids replace solids-laden OBMs for lower completions.

Risk reductionIn addition to time and cost savings, Ridge finds formate fluids decrease risk by facilitating solids-free overbalanced operations. It states: “The level of well control preparedness required to handle a deep barrier leak during an underbalanced completion lies far beyond the normal competency levels that rig crews are certified for by the International Well Control Forum (IWCF). Any subsequent off-bottom kill operation will also be extremely complex and risky. Snubbing or drilling of a relief well may ultimately be required. When it comes to time savings, the main time-saving element is the elimination of the inflow test and the reduced risk of debris on top of the reservoir barrier. Cesium/potassium formate completion fluids allow solids-free overbalanced operations and reduce risk in line with the ALARP (as low as reasonably practicable) principle.”

Ridge concludesIn its conclusions, Ridge finds significant time-saving potential in drilling and completing HPHT and non-HPHT reservoirs with formate fluids stating: “The major value is in their potential to enhance the probability of successfully delivering these wells in much shorter time and with lower risk.”

Page 4: Formate Matters Newsletter -Issue 10 -  March 2016

4 – FORMATE MATTERS Issue no. 10 – March/April 2016

For further information, please contact Cabot Specialty Fluids Ltd., Cabot House, Hareness Circle, Altens Industrial Estate, Aberdeen. AB12 3LY. UK. T: (44) 1224 897229. E: [email protected] NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER. This newsletter is designed to provide information of a general nature and is not intended as a substitute for professional consultation and advice in a particular matter. The opinions and interpretations expressed within are those of the author only and may not reflect those of other identified parties. Cabot Specialty Fluids Ltd. does not warrant the accuracy and completeness of this newsletter, nor endorse or make any representations about its content. In no event will

Cabot Specialty Fluids Ltd., Cabot Corporation or any of their subsidiaries, affiliates, officers, directors or employees be liable for any damages whatsoever arising out of the use of or reliance on the contents of this newsletter.© 2016 Cabot Corporation. All rights reserved.

Printed on recycled paper

A new full-scale drilling test performed in a high-pressure drilling simulator illustrates effects of water activity and solids content of formate brines on rate of penetration (ROP). It clearly shows significantly improved rates in shales. Key results are:

TECHNICAL FORUM

20

40

60

80

100

Mancos results

Rat

e of

pen

etra

tion

(ft/

hr)

Weight on bit (K-lbs)

120

140

0

15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35

11.2 lb/gal mixed formate mud16.0 lb/gal base mud15.7 lb/gal mixed formate mud

9.5 lb/gal base mud

Formate brines greatly improve ROP in shales. Arrows indicate the improvement gained by switching

from WBMs to formate brines

50% improvement for low-solids (10 ppb) mud and 20% improvement for high-solids (40 ppb) mud for high-salinity, 1.88 g/cm3/ 15.7 lb/gal formate mud compared to 1.92 g/cm3/16 lb/gal water-based mud (WBM) − see figure

60% improvement for low-solids (10 ppb) mud and 15% improvement for high-solids (40 ppb) mud for lower salinity, 1.34 g/cm3/ 11.2 lb/gal formate mud compared to 1.14 g/cm3/9.5 lb/gal WBM

Professor van Oort of the University of Austin, Texas completed the study using high-salinity cesium/potassium formate drilling fluid with low water activity and lower salinity cesium/potassium formate drilling fluid with higher water activity. These fluids were based on the same cesium/potassium formate blend, but one was significantly cut back with water. Both were viscosified with xanthan and, to study the effects of

solids, 10 ppb calcium carbonate was added in the first test and 40 ppb in the second. Two WBMs with different densities were included as reference fluids. The tests were completed in Mancos shale at Baker Hughes’ high-pressured drilling simulator in Houston. Bottomhole pressure was 6,000 psi.

The research clearly shows that high-salinity formate mud increases shale-drilling speeds. Professor van Oort explains: “Faster drilling is facilitated through chemical osmosis, which dehydrates and strengthens clay-rich rocks. In turn, this forms a lubricating layer that helps prevent rock build-up on the cutter edges and cutter body, meaning failed rock is more efficiently cut and transported away from the bit.”

The study helps quantify field experience from several operators, including DMK Drilling Fluids in Canada, which saved days drilling each of

FULL-SCALE TESTING REVEALS ROP-ENHANCING PROPERTIES OF FORMATE BRINES

COMPETITION

100-plus wells by replacing oil-based mud with potassium formate brine (see cabotcorp.com/formatematters9).

Reference: Van Oort, E., Ahmad, M., Spencer, R., Legacy, N.: “ROP Enhancement in Shales through Osmotic Processes”, SPE/IADC-173138-MS, March 2015.

AND FINALLY...

“Where oil is first found is in the minds of men.” Wallace Pratt (1885–1981), pioneering American petroleum geologist

Your five questions:

1. Which operator in which field first used cesium formate brine in 1999?

2. Name ten oil and gas operating companies that have used cesium formate brine.

3. Provide five benefits of using cesium formate brine.

4. Where is our dedicated technical service centre based?

5. How many sections of the Formate Technical Manual are published and available on the website?

Our thanks to all those who entered the ‘Lost for Words’ competition in the last issue. The lucky winners are from Baker Hughes and Schlumberger. For answers to the previous competition, or for the complete rules of this quiz, please email [email protected].

SITEUNSEEN? Cabotcorp.com/cesiumformate is a virtual treasure trove for anyone interested in drilling, completion, workover and suspension fluids. Recently restructured and redesigned, it contains a wealth of knowledge on these unique brines. To celebrate our new site, we thought we’d ask you to take a look and answer five questions on its content. If you answer all correctly, you’ll have a chance of winning an AR.Drone 2.0 Elite Edition from Parrot. Controlled by your smart phone this robust, easily manoeuvrable drone streams high-resolution video to your device in real time. Why not try your luck and have a go at answering the questions to the right?

To enter, please send your answers to [email protected] by 29 April 2016. The winner is the first person

with correct answers drawn randomly from the list of entrants. Good luck!

WIN your own

drone!