46

Evaluating Lighting Controls - Results from the Next Generation Luminaries Design Competition

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Slide 1

Evaluating Lighting Controls. Results from the Next Generation Luminaires Design Competition.

Credit(s) earned on completion of this course will be reported to AIA CES for AIA members. Certificates of Completion for both AIA members and non-AIA members are available upon request.

This course is registered with AIA CES for continuing professional education. As such, it does not include content that may be deemed or construed to be an approval or endorsement by the AIA of any material of construction or any method or manner ofhandling, using, distributing, or dealing in any material or product.

___________________________________________

Questions related to specific materials, methods, and services will be addressed at the conclusion of this presentation.

AbstractAs lighting controls are perhaps the fastest moving aspect of lighting technology, this presentation discusses the recent evaluations of LED luminaires and lighting controls completed by the Next Generation Luminaires Design Competition. Unlike previous NGL presentations at LEDucation (and elsewhere), this session focuses on the evaluation of lighting controls, discussing both methodology and results.The presentation will cover NGL evaluations in four areas: (1) quantitative and visual evaluation of luminaires, (2) basic dimming of submitted luminaires using digital protocols, (3) color tuning controls, and (4) connected lighting systems.

Learning ObjectivesAssess the submission requirements and evaluation methods used in the 2016 NGL Indoor Design CompetitionIdentify tentative conclusions about luminaire and controls performance based on the evaluation resultsCompare the lighting and controls results from current and recent competitionsRecognize the gaps in current knowledge and highlight areas for continuing evaluation

Ruth Taylor, IES; Pacific Northwest National LaboratoryDan Blitzer, LC; The Practical Lighting Workshop Presenters

Competition PartnersPartnerships link energy efficiency & lighting quality

What Well Cover TodayUnderstanding NGLThe Indoor Competition in 2016Luminaire Evaluations Color Evaluations Dimming EvaluationsConnected Lighting What did we learn . . . and what was not clearNext steps for NGL

NGL in Action - VideoVideo loop 4 mins.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zFTRBkwH5ak

NGL 2008-2016 Weve Learned a Lot!Performance CriteriaDocumentationServiceabilityControls

And Seen Lots of Products2016 IndoorAllIntents1211937Judged621023% of intents judged51%53%Awards15361% of judged awarded24%35%

Updated (from RTs spreadsheet)DB Changed title11

New in 2016 - IndoorLuminaire focused categories with application targetsHigh output recessed downlightsLinear pendantsIndustrial high bays2x2 troffers

Control areasSingle - digital (all applications)Single - dim to warm & white tunableConnected lighting systems

Application Focused TargetsCategorySpacingCeiling Ht.Avg. Initial fc at the 30 Work Plane Max/Min RatioConceptual Application Target 2 x 2 Recessed Troffers12 x 12930 fc3:1Open OfficePendant Mounted Linear12 o.c. 1030 fc 3:1Open OfficeHigh Output Recessed Downlights10 x 102030 fc 3:1Auditorium or LobbyIndustrial High Bay 20 x 202020 fc, 5 fc vertical illumination 10 aff3:1High Ambient Industrial (suitable for 50 C)

2016 Outdoor FocusPedestrian Scale12 decorative post top with dimmingBollards

Parking GarageDetailed controls evaluationChallenges

Judging ApproachOrganized by applicationProduct EvaluationInstalled and lightedTable top serviceabilityDocumentationProcessIndependent judgmentPreliminary scoringDiscussion and decisionPost judging analysis & verification

Scoring

Seeing is Believing

Evaluating Color

Color QualityEvaluation is based on visual evaluation of the color appearance, consistency, and rendering of the installed luminaire.

We collected TM-30 data for the first time in 2016.

48% of entrants submitted data.

TM-30 Data

Judges could see CRI value but not TM-30 data during judging.

How Judging Scores Compare to TM-30 DataCRI/Rf Awarded

CRI/Rf Submitted

Rg Awarded

Rg Submitted

Lt. green - CRIDk. green - Rf

21

Evaluating Dimming

Digital Dimming EvaluationWhat we have tried in the pastWhat we did this year

Indoor Control Requirements DMX512: Entries must be shipped to the judging location wired with DMX-In & DMX-Out connectors. Connector should be XLR-5, male for input, female for output. Pinout will be as follows:Pin 1 Signal CommonPin 2 DMX Data Pin 3 DMX Data +Pin 4 NonePin 5 NoneDALI: Luminaires must be provided with 3-0 leads of Purple (DALI+) and Gray (DALI-) THHN wire connected to the luminaire. Luminaires will be addressed in the field.Proprietary systems: (System using proprietary control protocols to control a light source. Individual addressing and control of each luminaire is required. 0-10v, forward phase, reverse phase, or 3-wire line voltage are not considered proprietary and will not be reviewed. Wall box dimming will also not be considered proprietary.)

All products must include detailed installation instructions. All connectors must be included; power will be via 5-15P Plug. System must be able to individually control each luminaire. Controller for judges must be provided on a 50 whip.

The Protocol MixAllWinners2015DALI39.6%63.2%DMX20.8%10.5%Proprietary39.6%26.3%2016DALI52.8%57.9%DMX30.2%21.1%Proprietary30.2%5.3%

Dimming SequenceDimming LevelFade Time1100%Zero fade2Power to luminaire3off - 100%, 100% - offZero fade4off - 100%, 100% - off5 sec5off - 100%, 100% - off15 sec6off - 100%, 100% - off30 sec7100%, 50%, 20%, 10%, 5%, 1%, offZero fade8off, 1%, 5%, 10%, 20%, 50%, 100%

Same sequence for each entry

Indoor Control Evaluation CriteriaColor constancy Dimming rangeDimming smoothnessStart conditionsFlickerOther criteria deemed appropriate by the judges

Understanding Dimming Curves

Dimming Schema

Intention Expectation0-10VDALIDMXOtherMeasured PerceivedLinearLogarithmic

What is being controlled?What does 50% dimmed mean?Control signal?Power?Measured light?Integrating sphere reading i.e. luminous fluxlight meter reading i.e. illuminancePerceived light?visual interpretationaffected by adaptation, eye dilationSource: IESNA Lighting Handbook, 9th Edition

Commercial DALI dimming curves

Connected Lighting Evaluation

Evaluation SpecificationsDLC CALC connectionKey parametersCode compliant DaylightPresence detectionIndividual controlOverlapping groupsEntrant optionsWired or wireless, hybrid OKIntegrated or separate

Evaluation Set UpAll entries in the same room3-6 luminaires providedDaylight simulatedPresence timed

Evaluation ProtocolEntrant guidePre-qualificationCheck list of capabilitiesReview of documentationVisual evaluationLighting performanceDimming performanceSensor performanceInstallation/configuration

What We Saw 2 Basic System TypesExternal controller with networked luminaires

Self-contained network (all logic on board)

External ControllerBenefits:Robust control functionality, typically can interface with BMSMany options for luminaire stylesWell suited for new construction and complex projectsLimitations:Dual points of responsibilityMore complicated installationMore complicated start up and commissioningCost for smaller projects

Manufacturer supplies control system, luminaire by others

Self-Contained NetworkBenefits:Integrated solution, single point of responsibilitySimple installation, start up, and commissioningWell suited for retrofits and smaller projectsLimitations:Limited control functionalityLimited options for luminaire styles

Integrated fixture/control out of the box

Challenges for the Next EvaluationHow do you know how system capability matches to project needs (mostly by experience today)?How do you know that you have correctly configured a system is professional commissioning necessary?In practice, if a system fails to meet expectations, is it capability, configuration, or defect?More robust evaluation setting (sensors)Better configuration process

Whats Ahead for NGL

Connected Lighting Current DOE Activities

2017 ThoughtsContinued emphasis on digital controls and connected systemsContinued refinement of application focused evaluationsMore realistic installations (expanded number of sites?)Your ideas are [email protected]

43

2016 Winners AnnouncementEnd of April San Diego, CA.

This concludes The American Institute of ArchitectsContinuing Education Systems Course

Thanks! Questions?