Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
ENoLL event, May 16th, 2011.
Citation preview
ENOLL AND THE FUTURE INTERNET PPP
CONTENTS ¤ Positioning Living Lab research in the European
Future Internet Development ¤ The Role of the Living Labs in implementing the Digital
Agenda ¤ The First Steps: FI PPP & CONCORD ¤ The Next Steps ENOLL PPP
WHY FOCUS ON FUTURE INTERNET? ¤ Future Internet is a core infrastructure in society, a backbone for smarter cities and regions ¤ Novel societal and commercial usages are challenging
the original Internet architecture ¤ Increased urgency to:
¤ Assume systems perspective and analyze the market impacts ¤ Prioritise visions and research directions in ICT ¤ Accumulate critical mass and engage wider communities ¤ Align and work across Work Programs and Calls
ROADMAP TOWARDS DIGITAL ECONOMY ¤ Digital Single Market ¤ Openness and interoperability even in absence of
standards ¤ Increased online trust and security ¤ Internet for all through improved coverage ¤ Funds for innovation and ICT research ¤ Digital inclusion ¤ Digital public services
VISION OF CITIES AS THE SYSTEMS OF SYSTEMS
IMPLEMENTATION BARRIERS FOR THE DIGITAL ECONOMY
LIVING LABS -CATALYSTS OF SYSTEMIC INNOVATION
Companies/industry
Academia
People(user represen-‐
tatives)
Publicorganizations
Techno-‐logies
Market
Legalframework
CompanyP/S
Company
P/SP/S P/SCompany
P/SCompanyP/S P/S
CompanyP/S P/S
Targets of Innovation:Single Product / ServiceOrganizationNetwork of Companies or IndustrySystemic level
DevelopmentOrganizations
Ministries
Educationalestablish-‐ments
PublicFundingOrg’s
Cities &Municipalities
EC APPROACH TO FUTURE INTERNET DEVELOPMENT
CIP/ ICT PSP -‐ large scale trials -‐ service innova/on -‐ Societal benefits
FP7/Future Internet PPP -‐ market oriented R&D -‐ cost-‐efficiency -‐ common enablers -‐ adapta/on to specific demands
FP7 -‐ longer-‐term R&D -‐ integra/on of new ICT & new ideas -‐open plaAorms and interoperability
Technology Risk
Piloting deployment 2-3 years 5-10 years Time to Market
FI PPP ADDRESSING THE IDENTIFIED CHALLENGES
¤ Builds upon and complement existing efforts in FI research ¤ Bridges the gap between
¤ Private and public interests, ¤ Demand and supply side stakeholders, ¤ The technology development, deployment and commercialisation
¤ Led by industry and driven by users ¤ Break down the proprietary barriers between different
applications, platforms and sectors ¤ Address regulatory and legal barriers, drives policy
FI PPP PROGRAMME IMPLEMENTATION Three-phased approach with open calls
CONCORD COORDINATION AND COLLABORATION FACILITATION FOR THE NEXT GENERATION FI PPP
¤ FI.ICT-2011.1.10 Programme Facilitation and Support project
¤ Consortium with strong background in Living Lab and Smart City experimentation
¤ Applying the frameworks and principles of organizing, managing and governing multi-stakeholder open innovation networks learned in the CIP projects
¤ Advocate open innovation, early user involvement, SME engagement and links to related initiatives
CONCORD PARTNERS Ø Aalto University (Aalto) Ø The Interdisciplinary institute for Broad Band Technology (IBBT) Ø Tieto- ja Viestintäteollisuuden Tutkimus Oy (TIVIT) Ø European Institute of Interdisciplinary Research (EIIR) Ø European Network of Living Labs (ENoLL) Ø European Regions Research and Innovation Network (ERRIN) Ø DOCOMO Euro Labs
CONCORD MISSION Ø The CONCORD supports the European Commission in the
successful implementation of a coherent FI PPP programme
Ø CONCORD coordinates and facilitate the alignment of FI PPP activities to ensure the continuous relevance, rigor and robustness of the co-created Future Internet concepts, visions and roadmaps.
Ø Strongly emphasizes linkages to other ongoing initiatives and the early involvement of demand side actors
CONCORD MAIN RESULTS Ø A coordination and decision-making framework for collaboration
between projects Ø A process by which to coordinate horizontal foundation and vertical
sectors’ activities and roadmaps Ø A knowledge exchange strategy and process for socio-technical
impact creation Ø Supporting elements for the implementation and uptake of FI
services
CONCORD IMPACT i) Accelerated development of experimental infrastructures for large-scale trials ü providing a comprehensive approach towards functionalities and non-technical
aspects (e.g. interoperability, openness, standards, data security and privacy) ii) Accelerated evolution of Future Internet infrastructure and ensured
system compatibility ü emergence of open, secure and trusted service platform and scalable networked
applications through coordination and joint specifications
iii) Increased effectiveness and alignment of activities ü management of interdependencies, defining a use rights for platform use
iv) Increased economic service sustainability ü novel business models, cross-sector industrial partnerships & early user involvement
CONTRIBUTION TO THE STATE OF THE ART v) Increased diversity ü empowering digital entrepreneurship by providing SME players with opportunities
to offer new products, equipments, services and applications
vi) Reinforced focus on transnational FI development drivers ü bringing in outside in view to the programme
vii) Improved ease of collaboration by user friendly FI PPP portal ü User friendly FI PPP portal including partner and project search functionalities and
knowledge resources
iix) Increased impact and linkages with global and national initiatives ü joint activities and a programme level dissemination regime
ADDED VALUE FOR THE COMMUNITY Ø Advancing FI PPP implementation through the identification, articulation,
recommendation and consensus-building on the identified technical and non-technical enablers for FI PPP
Ø Increased stability and sustainability of the communities Ø Ensuring and facilitating the participation of SME’s, (user) communities
and citizens in addition to the incumbent players Ø Tools, frameworks and open platforms for stakeholder cooperation Ø Increased visibility of the projects’ outcome and possible use cases Ø Bridging gaps in research and policies Ø Networking and exchanging information concerning FI PPP
CONCORD SERVICES ¤ Coordination of the FI PPP Management ¤ Joint Dissemination Strategy ¤ Facilitation of thematic Working Groups ¤ Events and Communications ¤ Community engagement ¤ Community portal at www.fi-ppp.eu ¤ Presentations and Templates
European Commission
Policy/decision making level
European Commission
PPP Programme Office
PPP Steering Board
Advisory Board
PPP Secretariat
Chair
Architecture Board
PPP Working Groups
HOW TO GET INVOLVED? ¤ Community portal at www.fi-ppp.eu ¤ Events:
¤ JUN 6, 2011 European Summit on the Future Internet, LUXEMBOURG hUp://www.future-‐internet.uni.lu/
¤ JUN 6-‐9, 2011 Internet of Things Week, BARCELONA www.iot-week.eu/2011
¤ JUN 14, 2011 5th Future Internet Cluster Workshop, WARSAW hUp://www.isgtw.org/event/5th-‐future-‐internet-‐cluster-‐workshop
¤ JUN 28-‐29, 2011 3rd Usage Area workshop, BRUSSELS hUp://ini/a/ve.future-‐internet.eu/events/3rd-‐usage-‐area-‐workshop.html
¤ SEP 12-‐16, 2011 Future Internet Symposium, BERLIN hUp://www.fis2011.org/
¤ SEP 27-‐29, 2011 4th NEM Summit, TORINO hUp://nem-‐summit.eu/
¤ OCT 24-‐26 24.-‐26.10.2011 Future Internet Assembly, POZNAN hUp://www.future-‐internet.eu/events/eventview/ar/cle/future-‐internet-‐assembly-‐poznan.html
¤ NOV 7-‐8, 2011 Global Forum, BRUSSELS hUp://www.items.fr/spip.php?rubrique110
HOW TO GET INVOLVED? The Future Calls: ¤ Call 2 Identifier: FP7-2012-ICT-FI (18 May – 28 October 2012) – budget 80 MEuro • Use Case Scenarios Pilots – Phase 2 (5 areas, 13.5 MEuro, 2 years) • Capacity Building (one IP, 12.5 MEuro, 2 years)
¤ Call 3 Identifier: FP7-2013-ICT-FI (December 2013) – budget 130 MEuro • Devoted to the expansion and enlargement of many testbeds and pilots (several areas, ~100 MEuro, 2 years)
• The project will advance interdisciplinary knowledge on the links between the socio-ecological transition and growth as well as the role of innovation.
¤ Transformation to post-industrial era: from transaction theory and resource based view to dynamic cababilities paradigm and actor network theories
¤ Discover how, where and when societal and economic value is generated for the various stakeholders in these networks.
• It will achieve a critical mass of resources and involve relevant communities, stakeholders, and practitioners enhancing the development of an improved research agenda for innovative social services and better instruments for innovation and coordinated social and economic governance in the EU.
¤ Close networking with ongoing FIRE, Living Lab and Policy initiatives
¤ Identify and analyze representative cases of policy or functional innovations
¤ Generalize and Theorize relevant aspects for wider adaptation
¤ Disseminate effectively through various communities and channels
• Innovation network Set of distinct institutions which jointly and individually contribute to the development and diffusion of new technologies and which provides the framework within which governments form and implement policies to influence the innovation process. As such it is a system of interconnected institutions to create, store and transfer the knowledge, skills and artefacts which define new technologies.” (Metcalfe, 1995)
ADDRESSING CALL OBJECTIVES
¤ Presenting innovative solutions for structural reforms and fiscal policies for income distribution, economic growth, negative impacts of Globalisation
¤ Providing sustainable means to influence global trends towards new socio-ecological development paths
¤ Proposal for a process for the Member States and the EU to adapt and coordinate their research, innovation and industrial policies towards the socio-ecological transition
¤ Presenting best practices in combining technological, economic and social innovations with focus on economic efficiency, their social equity and their environmental performance
¤ Proposing new sectors that may develop alongside the socio-ecological transition ¤ Assessment of ICT contribution to the achievement of the economic, social and
environmental objectives ¤ Presenting sectoral analysis for the evaluation of economic, social and environmental
regulations and organisations needed for the socioecological transition ¤ Analyzing the specific challenges for the urban, peri-urban and rural areas concerning
the locations of work and leisure, habitat, landscape and infrastructure ¤ Defining the cultural contexts of the socio-ecological transition ¤ Applying interdisciplinary analyses (economics, sociology, history, philosophy,
anthropology)to the collective meanings of "well-being” ¤ Review of the historical analysis of past "systemic transitions"
APPLIED SYSTEMS OF INNOVATION APPROACH
Sectoral Innova/on Systems
Na/onal Innova/on Systems
Regional Innova/on Systems
• Extension of systems-oriented theory and research in the economics of innovation • A non-linear interdisciplinary perspective relevant to formation of innovation policy • Considers systems of innovation as evolutionary systems, performative view of knowledge • Particularly to demand side instruments • Systems oriented approach emphasizing interdependency and interactive learning • Incremental innovation process with feedback and trials • Employ historical perspectives • Emphasize the central role of institutions • Stress comparisons instead of (sub)optimization of systems • Presents conceptual frameworks rather than formal theories • Direct implications to the development of corporate strategies and public policies
Levels of Analysis
RESEARCH DOMAINS
Demand Side
Concept for socio-‐technical regimes: Technological, Science, Policy, Socio-‐
cultural, User and Market
Instruments: User-‐involvement, openess Public sector pre-‐commercial procurement and innova/on
System’s perspec/ves: Chain-‐Linked model
Distributed process model Interac/ve learning theory
Network analysis Development Block theory
Large technical system’s approach
Impact criteria: -‐Stability of the systems
-‐ Genera/ve, Transforma/ve, Resource-‐integra/on and User-‐
interac/on capabili/es
Supply Side Systems-‐oriented approach to supply side Socio-‐technical real-‐life experiments to
accelerate adapta/on
Interplay of the actors: -‐Cultural and contextual factors, learning and
adapta/on, complementary artefacts, knowledge transfer, technical design
Increased emphasis on adapta/on and u/lisa/on Role of regula/ve, norma/ve and cogni/ve
ins/tu/ons
Visualisa/on tools, methodologies, fidelty with real world
Alignment, Coordina/on
