26
EARTH RETAINING EARTH RETAINING STRUCTURES STRUCTURES MARLIZA ASHIQIN BT KHAZALI MARLIZA ASHIQIN BT KHAZALI TOPIC 4 : TOPIC 4 : LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE

Earth retaining 2

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

prepared by marliza@PSA

Citation preview

Page 1: Earth retaining 2

EARTH RETAINING EARTH RETAINING STRUCTURES STRUCTURES

MARLIZA ASHIQIN BT KHAZALIMARLIZA ASHIQIN BT KHAZALI

TOPIC 4 : TOPIC 4 : LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE

Page 2: Earth retaining 2

COURSE LEARNING COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMEOUTCOME

• CLO 1 : Explain clearly the principle and CLO 1 : Explain clearly the principle and concept of geotechnical engineering (C4)concept of geotechnical engineering (C4)

• CLO 2 : Solve problems in soil stability CLO 2 : Solve problems in soil stability using appropriate method (C4)using appropriate method (C4)

Page 3: Earth retaining 2

LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE

Types of Retaining Wall

2.4.1 Gravity Walls

2.4.2 Embedded walls

2.4.3 Reinforced and anchored earth

Page 4: Earth retaining 2

LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE

Gravity Walls

2.4.1 Gravity Walls

Masonry walls

Gabion walls

Crib walls

RC walls

Counterfort walls

Buttressed walls

Page 5: Earth retaining 2

LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE

Gravity Walls

Unreinforced masonry wall

Page 6: Earth retaining 2

LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE

Gravity Walls

Gabion wall

Page 7: Earth retaining 2

LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE

Gravity Walls

Crib wall

Page 8: Earth retaining 2

LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE

Gravity Walls

Types of RC Gravity Walls

Page 9: Earth retaining 2

LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE

Embedded Walls

2.4.2 Embedded walls

Driven sheet-pile walls

Braced or propped walls

Contiguous bored-pile walls

Secant bored-pile walls

Diaphram walls

Page 10: Earth retaining 2

LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE

Embedded Walls

Types of embedded walls

Page 11: Earth retaining 2

LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE

Reinforced and Anchored Earth

2.4.3 Reinforced and anchored earth

Reinforced earth wall

Soil nailing

Ground anchors

Page 12: Earth retaining 2

LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE

Reinforced and anchored earth

Reinforced earth and soil nailing

Page 13: Earth retaining 2

LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE

Stability Criteria

2.5 Stability of Rigid Walls

Failures of the rigid gravity wall may occur due to any of the followings:

Overturning failure Sliding failure Bearing capacity failure

In designing the structures at least the first three of the design criteria must be analysed and satisfied.

Page 14: Earth retaining 2

LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE

The stability of the retaining wall should be checked against :

(ii) FOS against sliding (recommended FOS = 2.0)

(i) FOS against overturning (recommended FOS = 2.0)

Stability Criteria

moment Disturbing

momentResisting FOS =

H

wpV

R

Bc P 0.7) -(0.5 tan RFOS

++=

δ

Page 15: Earth retaining 2

LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE

Stability Analysis

Pp

Ph

∑ V

A

The stability of the retaining wall should be checked against :

2.3.1 FOS against overturning (recommended FOS = 2.0)

moment Disturbing

momentResisting FOS =

.. overturning about A

Page 16: Earth retaining 2

LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE

2.3.2 FOS against sliding (recommended FOS = 2.0)

Stability Criteria

H

wpV

R

Bc P 0.7) -(0.5 tan RFOS

++=

δ

Ph

∑ V

Pp

Friction & wall base adhesion

Page 17: Earth retaining 2

LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE

+=

B6e

B

R q V

b 1

2.3.3 For base pressure (to be compared against the bearing capacity of the founding soil. Recommended FOS = 3.0)

Now, Lever arm of base resultant

Thus eccentricity

R

Moment x

V

∑=

x - 2

B e =

Stability Criteria

Page 18: Earth retaining 2

LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE

Stability Analysis

Pp

Ph

∑ V

Base pressure on the founding soil

Page 19: Earth retaining 2

Stability AnalysisLATERAL EARTH PRESSURE

Figure below shows the cross-section of a reinforced concrete retaining structure. The retained soil behind the structure and the soil in front of it are cohesionless and has the following properties:

SOIL 1 : φu = 35o, γd = 17 kN/m3, SOIL 2 : φu = 30o, δ = 25o , γd = 18 kN/m3,

γsat = 20 kN/m3

The unit weight of concrete is 24 kN/m3. Taking into account the passive resistance in front of the wall, determine a minimum value for the width of the wall to satisfy the following design criteria:

Factor of safety against overturning > 2.5Factor of safety against sliding > 1.5Maximum base pressure should not exceed 150 kPa

Worked example :

Page 20: Earth retaining 2

Stability AnalysisLATERAL EARTH PRESSURE

SOIL 2

2.0 m

0.5 m

0.6 m

2.9 m

2.0 m

GWT

4.5 m

SOIL 1

SOIL 2

30 kN/m2

4.0 m

THE PROBLEM

Page 21: Earth retaining 2

LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE

Stability Analysis

P1P3

SOIL 2

2.0 m

0.5 m

0.6 m

2.9 m

2.0 mGWT

4.5 m

SOIL 1

SOIL 2

30 kN/m2

4.0 m

P2P4

PP

W41

W3

W2

W1

P5

THE SOLUTION

P6

Page 22: Earth retaining 2

LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE

Stability Analysis

271.035sin1

35sin -1

sin1

sin1o

o

1 =+

=+−=

φφ

aK

333.030sin1

30sin -1

sin1

sin1o

o

2 =+

=+−=

φφ

aK

00.330sin1

30sin 1

sin1

sin1o

o

2 =−+=

−+=

φφ

pK

Determination of the Earth Pressure Coefficients

Page 23: Earth retaining 2

LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE

Stability Analysis

Page 24: Earth retaining 2

LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE

Stability Analysis

OK is it thus 2.5, moment Disturbingmoment Resisting >=== 83.3

50.336

55.1288FOS

To check for stability of the retaining wall

(i) FOS against overturning > 2.5

(ii) FOS against sliding > 1.5

1.5 ..

60.75x 0.5 25tan .

R

P0.5 tan RFOS

o

H

pV <=+=+

= 34194180

9452δ

Thus it is not OK

Page 25: Earth retaining 2

LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE

Stability Analysis

+=

B6e

B

R q V

b 1

2.10 452.9

336.5 - 1288.55

RMoment

xV

==∑=

(iii) For base pressure

Now, Lever arm of base resultant

0.15 2.10 - 2.25 x - 2B

e ===

+=

4.50.15 x 6

4.5

452.9 qb 1

Thus eccentricity

Therefore

Page 26: Earth retaining 2

Stability AnalysisLATERAL EARTH PRESSURE

qb = 120.8 and 80.5 kPa

Since maximum base pressure is less than the bearing pressure of the soil, the foundation is stable against base pressure failure.

DISTRIBUTION OF BASE PRESSURE

80.5 kPa120.8 kPa

In conclusion the retaining wall is not safe against sliding. To overcome this the width of the base may be increased or a key constructed at the toe.