36
Advances in the use of eCognition for forest research and applications Dr. Pete Bunting

E Cognition User Summit2009 Pbunting University Wales Forestry

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Advances in the use of eCognition for forest research and applications

Citation preview

Page 1: E Cognition User Summit2009 Pbunting University Wales Forestry

Advances in the use of eCognition for forest research and applications

Dr. Pete Bunting

Page 2: E Cognition User Summit2009 Pbunting University Wales Forestry

Contents

• Individual tree analysis– High resolution forest mask

– Delineation Approach

• Fusing with other high resolution data

• Scaling to the landscape

• Future work…

Page 3: E Cognition User Summit2009 Pbunting University Wales Forestry

Individual Tree Analysis

Page 4: E Cognition User Summit2009 Pbunting University Wales Forestry

Individual Tree Analysis

Page 5: E Cognition User Summit2009 Pbunting University Wales Forestry

Forest Mask

• To delineate crowns the non-tree areas need to be removed.– Otherwise, bright areas (e.g., bare soil) would

be delineated as if they were crowns.

• Unfortunately, there is no single solution to the classification of forest/non-forest from high resolution imagery. – But, there are methodologies which can help.

Page 6: E Cognition User Summit2009 Pbunting University Wales Forestry

Indexes and Indices for Forest Discrimination

• Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI).

• Forest Discrimination Index (FDI)– Requires hyper-spectral data over the red

edge.€

NDVI =r 750 - r 680

r 750 + r 680=

NIR - RED

NIR + RED

FDI = r 838 - r 714 + r 446( ) = NIR - (RE + BLUE )

Page 7: E Cognition User Summit2009 Pbunting University Wales Forestry

Forest Discrimination Methodology

• A common problem is the variability in image brightness across the scene. – North/South facing slops

– Sensor noise

– Contrast with other ground cover types.

• Using two levels where the discrimination threshold(s) is varied with respect to the brightness of the upper level.

Page 8: E Cognition User Summit2009 Pbunting University Wales Forestry

Forest Discrimination Methodology

• Image processed in sections (large segments).– Do not need to be squares any segmentation

will do.

Page 9: E Cognition User Summit2009 Pbunting University Wales Forestry

Individual Tree Analysis

Page 10: E Cognition User Summit2009 Pbunting University Wales Forestry

Hill and Valley Model

• It is helpful to view the data with this model.

• Works with either brightness or height.

• High points the crown tops.

• Valleys crown edges.

Page 11: E Cognition User Summit2009 Pbunting University Wales Forestry

Individual Tree Analysis

Page 12: E Cognition User Summit2009 Pbunting University Wales Forestry

Splitting the Forest into Crowns

We locate the bright areas of the crown and grow to

the crown edge.

Page 13: E Cognition User Summit2009 Pbunting University Wales Forestry

Using a Global VariableSimplify your process with a variable:

WithoutWith

Setup variable

Loop until reach the required value

Increment the variable

Page 14: E Cognition User Summit2009 Pbunting University Wales Forestry

Individual Tree Analysis

Page 15: E Cognition User Summit2009 Pbunting University Wales Forestry

Merging Small Objects

• During the splitting process small bits of crowns can ‘knocked off’.

• Following splitting a process which merges small objects (a few pixels in size) with their largest neighbor is executed.

Page 16: E Cognition User Summit2009 Pbunting University Wales Forestry

Individual Tree Analysis

Page 17: E Cognition User Summit2009 Pbunting University Wales Forestry

Classifying Tree Crowns• Objects representing whole crowns were

classified to prevent further splitting.

• Rules to identify crowns are mostly based on their shape properties, including– Elliptical fit,

– Roundness,

– Length/width ratio.

• Additionally, some spectral properties can be useful– For example, standard deviation.

Page 18: E Cognition User Summit2009 Pbunting University Wales Forestry

Individual Tree Analysis

Page 19: E Cognition User Summit2009 Pbunting University Wales Forestry

Examples of Merging CrownsBright point merging Including small objects

Before AfterBefore After

Relative Border Relative size

Before After Before After

Page 20: E Cognition User Summit2009 Pbunting University Wales Forestry
Page 21: E Cognition User Summit2009 Pbunting University Wales Forestry
Page 22: E Cognition User Summit2009 Pbunting University Wales Forestry

Parco Nazionale d’Abruzzo, Lazio e Molise, Italy

www.definiens.com

Page 23: E Cognition User Summit2009 Pbunting University Wales Forestry

Object Variables: Mean-lit Spectra• To associate delineated crowns with a

species type, we extract and use the reflectance spectra from the ‘brightest’ part of the crown.

• These ‘mean-lit’ spectra allow better discrimination between tree species.

• eCognition allows the extraction of values on a per object basis and their assignment as local variables (e.g., tree reflectance spectra).

• These can be used as object features in the subsequent classification of species.

Level 2

Level 1

Page 24: E Cognition User Summit2009 Pbunting University Wales Forestry

Object Variables for Tree Species Classification

Object Mean Object Variables

Page 25: E Cognition User Summit2009 Pbunting University Wales Forestry

An example of tree species classification in Australia

Eucalyptus populnea

Eucalyptus melanaphloia

Stereo Air-Photo

Page 26: E Cognition User Summit2009 Pbunting University Wales Forestry

26

LiDAR Height

CASI reflectance

LiDAR HSCOI

CASI band ratio

CASI Tree Crowns

LiDAR Tree Crowns - Before auto-registration of CASI data

LiDAR Tree Crowns - After auto-registration of CASI data

Species Map of crowns from CASI data

Biomass Map

Stem Locations

Integration of CASI/LIDAR Data

Branch Locations

Page 27: E Cognition User Summit2009 Pbunting University Wales Forestry

27

Automated delineation of forest communities

Page 28: E Cognition User Summit2009 Pbunting University Wales Forestry

Landsat / AIRSAR Classification

• Using grids (at 25 m resolution) and the dominate and co-dominate species

• Landsat spectral data• Landsat FPC• AIRSAR LHH and LHV (Available on ALOS-PALSAR)

• Produce a rulebase object-oriented classification

28

Page 29: E Cognition User Summit2009 Pbunting University Wales Forestry

Comparison to Landsat

29

CASISpeciesCrown Cover

Page 30: E Cognition User Summit2009 Pbunting University Wales Forestry

Identifying thresholds

30

Page 31: E Cognition User Summit2009 Pbunting University Wales Forestry

eCognition Process

31

Page 32: E Cognition User Summit2009 Pbunting University Wales Forestry

Classification of Communities

• Integration of L-band (HH/HV) SAR and optical Landsat data.

• Rules identified using communities identified from the high resolution datasets.

32

Page 33: E Cognition User Summit2009 Pbunting University Wales Forestry

33

Future Work…

Page 34: E Cognition User Summit2009 Pbunting University Wales Forestry

Long-term change observed from LiDAR, Injune

August 2000 – Optech ALTM1020

April 2009 – Riegl LMS-Q560

0m 30m

HeightJorg Hacker, Ariborne Research Australia, Alex Lee/John Armston

Page 35: E Cognition User Summit2009 Pbunting University Wales Forestry

LiDAR v TLS

Page 36: E Cognition User Summit2009 Pbunting University Wales Forestry

Thank you for listening

[email protected]