Upload
paul-jacobson
View
9.433
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
This is a presentation I gave in 2007 arguing against adoption of Office Open XML as a document standard.
Citation preview
Document Formats
What is “open”?
1
Office Open XML
• Developed by Microsoft• XML based• Published specifications• Vendor specific
2
Open Document Format
• Developed by OASIS• XML based• Published specifications• Open source
3
What is the real issue?
(It isn’t really a technical issue)
4
It is a policy issue
5
It is about open access
Photo titled “Open Access” by Shooting the breeze licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial ShareAlike license on Flickr.
6
Open access to human knowledge and information is facilitated by truly open document formats.
Information must be made available to the broadest possible cross-
section of the population.
7
It is about software too
• Document formats require applications to read and create them
• Applications require an operating system to run them
• What does the whole package cost?
8
Office Open XML
• Works with Microsoft Office (Standard edition costs roughly R4 400 off the shelf)
• Requires Microsoft Windows (Vista costs roughly R2 250 off the shelf)
• Bulk licensing still has a price
9
Open Document Format
• Works with a number of office suites including OpenOffice and NeoOffice (free)
• Versions for Microsoft Windows, Mac OS and Linux (Ubuntu Linux, for one, is free and comes with OpenOffice)
• As many copies as you want (free)
10
“Free” as in everyone has access
Photo titled “Villager in a hut window” by Hot Foot licensed under Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial No Derivatives license on Flickr.
11
Two standards?
• Two standards means no standards• Users still forced to choose between
competing and incompatible formats• A successful standard should have
multiple implementations• No open access means the people are
prejudiced
12
“The goal of the Technical Committee is to produce a formal standard for office productivity
applications within the Ecma International standards process which is fully compatible with the
Office Open XML Formats.”
- Scope of the Open XML format of the ECMA programme of work (emphasis added)
13
Should a document format be certified as a standard based on the
applications intended to support it?
14
Or should a standard be platform agnostic?
15
“Proprietary file formats are worse than proprietary software because they
leave you with no ability to switch at a later time”
- Jimmy Wales speaking at Wikimania 2005
16
Who controls the document format?
Photo titled “Engine Controls” by Nick Blaire licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives license on Flickr.
17
Office Open XML
• Development controlled by Microsoft and a vendor specific community
• Linked to Microsoft Office• Version dependent? Probably
18
Open Document Format
• Development by an open source community
• Application neutral• Version dependent? Arguably not
19
What does this have to do with anything?
20
For one thing it means users have a real choice ...
21
... and let’s not forget the cost
22
Thank you!
23
Paul Jacobson
The African Commons ProjectThe Open Law ProjectJacobson Attorneys
[email protected] 444 8260
24