View
565
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Historical Perspectives in Addressing Soil Fertility Problems,Key Soil Fertility Research at IITA
Citation preview
Developing ISFM Options for Smallholder
Agriculture in Africa: Experiences from WA
Sylvester OIKEH (Ph D)
Africa Rice Center (WARDA)
Cotonou, Benin
Seminar for the Position of IITA Soil Fertility Specialist
22 September 2008, IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria
• Background
• Historical perspectives on soil fertility
• Key soil fertility research at IITA
• Concept of ISFM
• My vision
Outline of Presentation
• Linking vision with key experiences
• Resource mobilization efforts
• Conclusion
Outline of Presentation Cont‟d
Background
What is Soil Fertility?
• Capacity of the soil to supply nutrients (N, P, K and other essential nutrients) to the crop
• Mixture of soil chemical, physical and biological factors affecting land potential
• Major problem: Inherent low fertility of African soils
Macronutrient Application Vs. Losses in Africa
4.4
0.5
3.0
0.8
0.3 0.2
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.02.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
N P KNutrients
Millio
n t
on
s p
er
ye
ar Loss
Applied
• In the developed world, overuse of fertilizer & manure is damaging envt.
• In SSA, low use of fertilizer is a major cause of environmental degradation
and poverty.
• Africa losses USD 4 billion/yr due to soil nutrient mining.
Source: Sanchez et al. 1997)
SOIL NUTRIENT MINING IS KILLING AFRICA
1995-97 2002-04
Source: IFDC
NetherlandsVietnam
JapanUK
ChinaFrance
BrazilUSAIndia
South AfricaCubaBenin
MalawiEthiopia
MaliBurkina Faso
NigeriaTanzania
Mozambique GuineaGhana
UgandaKg/ha
Source: FAOSTAT, July 2003;
Norman Borlaug, 2004
0 100 200 300 400
Fertilizer use: 8 kg per ha
in Sub-Sahara Africa is the
lowest in the world
500 600
• Fertilizer Summit, 2006: „to increase the fertilizer use from 8 to 50 kg ha-1 nutrients by 2015‟.
• Fertilizer is a “golden bullet” to power African Green Revolution (Adesina, 2007)
Fertilizer Use Around the Globe
Historical Perspectives in
Addressing Soil Fertility ProblemsPeriod Paradigm Role of fertilizer Role of organic
inputs
Experiences
1960s
&
1970s
External
input
Paradigm
Use of fertilizer
alone will ↑ and
sustain yields
Organic resources
played a minor role
Limited success
because of Shortfall
in infrastructure,
policy, etc.
1980s Organic
input
Paradigm
Fertilizer played a
minimal role
Organic resources
are main source of
nutrients (Alley
farming system)
Limited adoption; OM
production requires
excessive land &
labor
1990s Sanchez’
2nd
Paradigm
Fertilizer use was
essential to
eliminate the main
nutrient
constraints
Organic resources
were the entry
point; but served
functions beside
nutrients release
Difficulties to access
organic resources
hampered adoption
(e.g. improved fallow)
2000s ISFM
Paradigm
Fertilizer is a
major entry point
to ↑ yields and
supply needed
org. inputs
Access to organic
resources has both
social and
economic
dimensions
On-going!
(Here we are!)
Annon (2007)
• Diagnostic studies on identification deficient nutrients in production systems across agroecologies
• Fertilizer response studies, but mostly on cereals (maize); limited on roots and tubers
• Alley farming/ improved fallow (limited adoption)
• Cereal-legume rotations (include ISFM)
• Use of phosphate rock in legume rotation systems (limited promotion)
Key Soil Fertility Research at IITA
Concept of ISFM
The application of soil fertility management practices (appropriate fertilizer + organic input + improved germplasm) and the knowledge to adapt these to local conditions to optimize fertilizer and organic resource- use efficiency and crop productivity
ISFM + Enabling environment
Integrated Soil Fertility Management Strategy
Integrated Pest
management
Institutions
and policy Soil Conservation
water management
Resilient germplasm /
fertilizer (Org+Inorg)
Markets
Ecosystem
Services
ISFM
• Promote ISFM in cereal-legume rotations with focus on promiscuous soybean-maize systems in Africa using participatory approaches
• Integrating mineral fertilizer component of ISFM package based on site-specific fertilizer balanced management practices
Vision
• Integrate ISFM principles into conservation agriculture in SSA with linkage to climate change/ land degradation
• Transform IITA Nutrition lab to a center of excellence for Bio-fortification studies
Vision cont‟d
• Review and establish ISFM guidelines for roots and tubers (particular focus on yam & cassava)
Vision cont‟d
Key issues:
• Limited N-use efficient crop varieties
• Dynamic nature of N in farmers‟ fields
• Limited use of available ISFM options
Promote ISFM in cereal-legume rotations using participatory approach
Experiences: N-use efficient crop varieties
(Screened maize cultivars under variable N to identify N-efficient cultivar)
Promote ISFM in cereal-legume rotations using participatory approach
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
75-90
60-75
45-60
30-45
15-30
0-15
So
il d
ep
th (
cm
)
0 g/plant
2.26 g/plant
1994/35 DAS
a
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
75-90
60-75
45-60
30-45
15-30
0-15
So
il d
ep
th (
cm
)
Root length density (cm cm-3
)
0 g/plant
0.56 g/plant
2.26 g/plant
1994/silking
N Vs. Root Length DensitySource: Oikeh, Kling, Horst, & Chude (1999). Field Crop Res. 62: 1-13
• N application stimulated root
production in surface soil at
early growth stage
• Greater root growth and
distribution observed at 30 kg N
ha-1 (0.56 g/plant) than at 0N or
120N
Root Length Density of Maize varieties
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
75-90
60-75
45-60
30-45
15-30
0-15
So
il d
ep
th (
cm
)
35 DAS
Cultivar
Plant ht
(cm)
(25 DAP)
RLE
(mm/day)
25-28 DAP
DM
(g/plant)
35DAP
EV8728 61.5 74.5 17.8
87TZPB 57.5 69.8 15.2
SPL 63.5 79.6 18.0
8644-27 (HYB)
61.3 73.9 15.2
TZB
(CTL)
59.5 70.8 14.3
LSD
(p=0.1)
1.6 3.1 2.4
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
75-90
60-75
45-60
30-45
15-30
0-15
So
il d
ep
th (
cm
)
Root length density (cm cm-3)
TZB
8644
SPL
TZPB
EV8728
Silking
Source: Oikeh, Kling, Horst, & Chude (1999). Field
Crop Research. 62: 1-13
• Varietal differences in RL at 35DAS
• All improved cvs. had better RL and
growth than the check
• TZPB & SPL had better root systems
in lower depth at silking
Cultivar
ASI
(d)
LGF
(d)
Grain yield
(Mg ha-1)
HI
(%)
N-util. eff.
(%)
N-use eff.
(kg grain/kg avail. N)
EV8728 3.4 48.0 5.0 40 50 18.5
87TZPB 5.3 45.6 4.8 36 46 16.6
SPL 3.1 43.4 5.0 41 50 17.4
8644-27 5.2 47.9 5.2 43 54 18.5
TZB-SR 4.2 46.1 4.7 35 45 16.6
SED 0.2* 0.5** 0.1+ 0.5** 0.7** 0.5*
CV (%) 3 3 16 9 9 20
Phenology, grain yield, HI, and N efficiency
parameters of maize cultivars as influenced by N
Source: Oikeh and Horst 2001: In: W.J Horst et al. (eds.). Plant Nutrition: Food security and sustainability of agroecosystems.
Development in Plant and Soil Science Book Series. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.
Mean N uptake over time as
influenced by N
Source: Oikeh, Carsky, Kling, Chude, & Horst (2003). Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 100: 181-191.
Cultivar
N
(kg ha-1)
N uptake (kg ha-1)
35 DAP Midsilk Grain Stover NHI (%) Total N
0 11 42 29 18 60 47
30 18 54 47 25 65 72
120 19 86 87 39 69 126
SED 1* 3** 2** 1** 1** 3**
EV8728 17 59 57 26 68 82
87TZPB 15 70 56 29 65 85
SPL 19 55 59 27 68 86
8644-27 15 63 53 26 66 79
TZB-SR 14 56 48 29 58 77
SED 1* 4* 3* 1 ns 1** 3ns
Experiences: Dynamic nature of N in farmers„ fields
Livelihood analysis:
5 Villages in 3 States, NGS, Nigeria
Major constraints as ranked by farmers:
• Low soil fertility/lack of fertilizers
• Striga hermonthica infestation
• Early season drought causing replanting
Promote ISFM in cereal-legume rotations using participatory approach
Patterns of NO3-N (0-30 cm) Dynamics in 35 Farmers‟ Fields, NGS
Source: Weber, Chude, Pleysier, & Oikeh (1995). Exp. Agric. 31: 333-344.
(7 fields)
(7 fields)
(7 fields)
(14 fields)
Managing N Dynamics Using ISFM Package
ISFM with Stylo organic inputs (fallen leaves + roots) slowed down N mineralization and N losses in soil-plant system
Source: Oikeh, Chude, Carsky, Weber, & Horst (1998). Experimental Agriculture 34: 73-83
So
yb
ean
Sty
lo
Maiz
e0
1
2
3
4
5
6
8644-27 (N-use eff.)
TZB-SR (N-ineff.)
Previous crop
Gra
in y
ield
(t
ha
-1)
On-farm ISFM Package
So
yb
ean
Sty
lo
Maiz
e0
1
2
3
4
5
6
8644-27 (N-use eff.)
TZB-SR (N-ineff.)
Previous crop
Gra
in y
ield
(t
ha
-1)
1.3 Mg ha-1 yield advantage
from legume rotation with
N-use eff. maize over 2-yr
continuous N-ineff. maize
Source: Oikeh, Chude, Carsky, Weber, & Horst (1998). Experimental Agriculture 34: 73-83
Mean Mineral N Balance (loss)
from Soil-plant System
TZ
B-S
R
87T
ZP
B-S
R
EV
8728-S
R
SP
L
8644-2
70
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Cultivars
N lo
ss
(kg
ha
-1)
• 35 – 122 kg N ha-1
lost (leaching)
• SPL had > capacity to take up N during grainfilling period thus minimizing N losses
• SPL had deep fine root system
Source: Oikeh, Carsky, Kling, Chude, & Horst (2003).
Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 100: 181-191.Nl/g = (Nup(t2) + Nmin(t2)) (Nfert + Nmin(t1) + N(rain))
Model Maize (Ideotype)
for African Savanna (e.g. SPL)
Adapted: Oikeh, Kling, Horst, & Chude (1999). Field Crop Res. 62: 1-13
• High seedling vigor and dense root system in
surface soil at early growth stage
• Fine, deep, and dense root system late in
season with extended N absorption into
grainfilling
• Short ASI and LGF
• > one ear per plant under low N
• High grain yield and harvest index
• Good grain processing quality (Oikeh, Kling, & Okoruwa
(1998). N fertilizer management effects on maize grain quality in West Africa. Crop
Science 38:1056-1061)
What Next ?
• Promote grain legume-cereal ISFM Africa-wide using participatory approaches
• Develop new ideotypes of crops for Africa using experience from maize ideotype
• Use existing models to predict nutrient flow and out-scaling ISFM options
Key issues:
• Limited fertilizer recommendations based on site-specific variability in soil fertility
• Fertilizer applications based on crop responses/ agroecologies lead to over or under-application in some fields
Integrating mineral fertilizer component of ISFM options based on site-specific FBMP
Experiences: Cultivar response to fertilizer (cultivar fertilizer) across agroecologies
Integrating mineral fertilizer component of ISFM options based on site-specific FBMP
N Vs. Dry-matter Yield
Dry-matter Yield
0 30 60 90 1200
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Y =8.8 + 6.0N - 1.3N2 R2=1.0
Y =2.8 + 3.5N - 0.8N2 R2=0.99
Total
Grain
Nitrogen rate
(kg ha-1)
Yie
ld (
t h
a-1
)
Source: Oikeh, Kling, Horst, & Chude (1997). Proceedings 5th Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Maize Conf.,
Arusha, Tanzania 3-7 June 1996. CIMMYT, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, pp 163-167
• 5 maize cultivars
screened under 4 N
levels for 2 yrs
• 60 kg N ha-1
adequate for maize
production under the
conditions of the
experimental site
NPK vs. Mean Grain Yield of 4
NERICAs Humid Forest, Nigeria
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Fertilizer treatment
NE
RIC
A y
ield
(M
g h
a-1
)
a
b
c
N60-P13-K25= 60 kg N, 13 kg P and 25 kg K per ha
N120-P26-K25= 120 kg N, 26 kg P and 25 kg K per ha.
N60-P13-K25 N120-P26-K25
Source: Oikeh et al. (2006). Fertilizer summit, 2006
60 kg/ha N
13 kg/ha P
25 kg/ha K
Zero N60-P13-K25 N120-P26-
K25
What Next ?
Integrate mineral fertilizer component of ISFM options based on site-specific nutrient content and crop requirement
Key issues:
• Climate change
• Land degradation
• Declining soil fertility
Integrate ISFM principles into conservation agriculture in SSA with linkage to climate change/ land degradation
Experience: Cowpea-NERICA Ecotechnology
(example of ISFM option developed with farmers in NGS, Benin)
Integrate ISFM principles into conservation agriculture in SSA with linkage to climate change/ land degradation
85-day NERICA 8
(Resilient, N-use efficient)
75-day Dual-purpose CowpeaFarmer‟s 80-day Cowpea (Katchè)
Organic inputs
+
Mineral N (20 kg ha-1)
Opening Ceremony of Soil Fertility Lab, WARDA Cotonou
AAS
Cowpea Rotation Vs. Soil-N at
21 and 42 DAS in 5 farmers‟ Fields
Rotation
NO3-N (T21; kg ha-1) Nmin (T42; kg ha-1)
Soil Depth (cm) Soil Depth (cm)
0 – 15 15 – 30 0 – 15 15 – 30
IT89KD-288 11.0 12.8 31.0 26.2
IT90-277-2 17.7 8.6 33.1 22.7
IT97-568-11 20.6 15.1 40.5 25.7
IT97K-1069-6 11.6 14.3 36.4 28.2
IT93K-452-1 15.6 13.9 28.0 23.5
Katechè (local) 12.7 8.5 25.0 27.0
Fallow 12.6 10.4 24.9 22.7
SE (Rot Depth) 2.78 3.31
Source: Oikeh, Niang, Abaidoo, Houngnandan, Koichi, Kone, & Toure (??). Cowpea-NERICA Rice Ecotechnology for
Sustainable Management of Degraded Tropical Savanna Soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal (in preparation).
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
IT90-277-2 IT97-568-11 IT97K-1089-6 IT93K-452-1 Local (Katché) Fallow
Previous crops
Gra
in Y
ield
(M
g.h
a-1
)
Mean NERICA8 Yield Vs. Previous Cowpea
(5 farmers‟ fields, NGS, Benin)
• Previous cowpea (IT97-568-11) + 20N gave 2.4 times > yield than
previous fallow + 0N (CTL) in Cowpea-NERICA Ecotechnology
Source: Oikeh, Niang, Abaidoo, Houngnandan, Toure & Mariko (2008). Abstract Submitted to Annual Meeting of CSA Societies, USA
N Fertilizer Replacement Value of Previous Cowpea cv. IT97-568-11
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
N Level (kg ha-1)
Gra
in Y
ield
(M
g h
a-1)
26 kg/ha N replacement
(N savings to the farmer)
from NERICA8 Vs. N
response curve
Source: Oikeh, Niang, Abaidoo, Houngnandan, Toure & Mariko (2008). Abstract Submitted to Annual Meeting of CSA Societies, USA
What Next ?
Promote conservation agriculture using ISFM principles
Key issues:
• Analyses of samples in advanced lab
• High transaction costs in developing micronutrients enhanced crops
Transform IITA Nutrition lab to center of excellence for Bio-fortification studies
Experience:
“Micronutrient Enhancement of Maize to Reduce Hidden Hunger”
Transform IITA Nutrition lab to center of excellence for Bio-fortification studies
Calcium
Deficiency
Ricket, WHOIron Deficiency Anemia, WHO
Summary of Findings
• Evaluated 49 late- & early-maturing maize across 3 contrasting ecologies for 2 yrs for Fe & Zn conc.
• Mean Fe: 16.5 – 23.1 mg kg-1 Late maize
• Mean Zn: 16.1 – 23.9 mg kg-1 “
• Mean Fe: 16.9 – 20.7 mg kg-1 Early maize
• Mean Zn: 18.2 – 21.2 mg kg-1 “
• Evaluated bioavailable Fe using a ModelGut (mimic digestive system; Glahn et al. 1996)
Sources: 1. Oikeh, Menkir, & Maziya-Dixon (2003). Journal of Plant Nutrition. 26: 2307 – 2319.
2. Oikeh, Menkir, Maziya-Dixon, Welch, Glahn, & Gauch JR. (2004). Journal of Agric. Science (Camb.). 142: 543 – 551.
A Cartoon of the In Vitro Digestion/Caco-2 Cell Culture Model
(Glahn et al. 1996)
500 mg maize sample
Pepsin Digestion
pH 2, 1 h, 37 C (50 mL tube)
Pancreatin-Bile Digestion
pH 6.8 – 7.0, 2 h, 37 C
Soluble iron
Insert ring
Dialysis membrane
15K MWCO
Culture well
Caco-2 cells
Harvest cells for ferritin determination
24 h post start of Panc/Bile digestion
Source
Pr>F
% of total variation
Fe bioav.(%)
Fe
bioav.
LOG (%)Fe bioav.
Loc 0.444 0.523 <1
Var 0.006 0.029 12
V x L 0.586 0.353 10
CV (%)
35 7
ANOVA of location, variety and G E interactions
on Fe bioavailability from Early-maturing maize
Sources: Oikeh, Menkir, Maziya-Dixon, Welch, & Glahn (2003). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 51: 3688-3694
Caco-2 Cell Ferritin Formation
Early-Maize (as % of Control)
3 4 2 6 51
1 81
4 11
5 91
91
31
82
0 71
61
01
71
20
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
Control(22)
* * * *
Variety
Caco
-2 C
ell
Ferr
itin
(as %
of
Co
ntr
ol)
Sources: Oikeh, Menkir, Maziya-Dixon, Welch, & Glahn (2003). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 51: 3688-3694
What Next ?
Back-stop breeders to develop and promote micronutrient enhanced crops at IITA
Review and establish ISFM guidelines for roots and tubers
Key issue:
Limited studies on improving soil
fertility for roots and tubers in Africa
Experience: None!
Review and establish ISFM guidelines for roots and tubers
What next?
Literature review on soil fertility studies
on roots and tubers
Conduct ISFM studies on roots and tubers
Develop ISFM guidelines for roots and
tubers production in Africa
Resource Mobilization Efforts (2006-2008)
Project Donor Value Partner
Smallholder rice-based livelihood and
income enhancement project for Liberia
UNDP $ 5.0m Min. of Agric.
Liberia/WARD
A/IITA/ AVRDC
Alleviating rural poverty through
improving rice production in E. & S.
Africa
IFAD $ 1.5m IRRI/WARDA
Enhancing smallholder access to
NERICA seed for alleviating rural
poverty in WCA
IFAD $ 1.5m WARDA
Development of sustainable rice
farming systems in LAC soils in West
African lowlands: Nutrients cycling in
sawah vs. non-sawah rice farming
systems
MOP
Japan
$ 0.18m WARDA
NUE Rice for Africa USAID $4.0m AATF/ARCAR
DIA/ WARDA
The vision of African Leaders: “to increase the fertilizer use from 8 to 50 kg ha-1 nutrients by 2015” (Fertilizer Summit, 2006) can only be actualized with the right enabling environments, with the right people in the right places
Conclusion
Thank you!
Merci!!
Asante sana!!!
Eshe‟o!!!!