32
Measuring Performance. April 4 th 2013 DCCE Confiden@al: Do not distribute without prior explicit approval . Slide 1 Measuring Outcome What to measure and its ra@onale

Csr measuring outcome

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Csr measuring outcome

Measuring  Performance.  April  4th  2013     DCCE  Confiden@al:  Do  not  distribute  without  prior  explicit  approval  .  Slide  1  

Measuring Outcome What  to  measure  and  its  ra@onale    

Page 2: Csr measuring outcome

Measuring  Performance.  April  4th  2013     DCCE  Confiden@al:  Do  not  distribute  without  prior  explicit  approval  .  Slide  2  

Public Private Partnership Par@cipatory  approaches  in  environmental  economics  

Business-centric approach ensures market participation and fit-for-purpose

Economic development but with socio-environmental competencies

Specifically tailored to the local culture and knowhow

Knowledge repository for carbon abatement, adaptation and mitigation

Leverage local projects as a market enabler activity to foster private sector participation

Generate value for market participants in the form of environmental finance

Page 3: Csr measuring outcome

Measuring  Performance.  April  4th  2013     DCCE  Confiden@al:  Do  not  distribute  without  prior  explicit  approval  .  Slide  3  

Green Economy for Sustainable Development A  low  carbon  development  Think  Tank  

“Private sector market enabler”

Vision

Support

DCCE was launched on on Jan. 18th 2011 during WFES by HH the Prime Minister and HE Ban Ki Moon

Page 4: Csr measuring outcome

Measuring  Performance.  April  4th  2013     DCCE  Confiden@al:  Do  not  distribute  without  prior  explicit  approval  .  Slide  4  

Energy  Cluster  created  to  foster  Green  

Economic  Growth  amongst  the  stakeholders  

Private-­‐Sector-­‐lead,  supported  by  key  leaders  in  u@li@es,  smelter  and  refinery  

Close  coordina@on  with  Interna7onal  

Organiza7on  and  especially  UNDP  

Structured  to  maximize  economic  benefits  through  Porter’s  Economic  Clusters  

Model  

Multi-Industry Approach Private  sector  lead  and  focused  –  UAE  case  study  

Page 5: Csr measuring outcome

Measuring  Performance.  April  4th  2013     DCCE  Confiden@al:  Do  not  distribute  without  prior  explicit  approval  .  Slide  5  

>

Green House Gas Inventories Managing  the  Dubai  GHG  inventory  and  now  conduc@ng  a  UAE-­‐wide  Inventory  

Industry (Direct emissions)

Power and water

Transport

AgricultureWasteBuildings (Direct emissions)Forestry

203020252020201520102005

Total greenhouse gas emissions,Mt CO2e

2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

Abatement

10 15 20

Abatement cost€ per tCO2e

255 30 3835

-90

-70

-50

-30

-100

60

-80

-60

-40

-20

-10

50

40

30

20

10

0

Ease  of  capture  (in  near-­‐term)

Readily achievable More challenging DifficultCost  today

Negative

Modest

High

▪ Appliances and electronics energy efficiency

▪ New build lighting controls ▪ Cropland nutrient mgmt▪ Energy efficiency, oil & gas▪ Methane leakage prevention,

oil & gas▪ Fuel shift, industry

▪ Geothermal, small hydro▪ Engine efficiency, LDVs1

▪ Energy efficiency packages, commercial new build

▪ Retrofit lighting controls▪ Solid waste (excl. landfill

gas flaring)▪ Cogeneration, other industries

▪ Solar & wind2; smart grids▪ Oil to gas shift, power▪ Energy efficiency packages,

residential new build▪ Reduced deforestation▪ Energy efficiency, other

industries▪ Agronomy practices, grassland

management▪ Soil restoration

▪ LED lighting▪ Tillage and residue mgmt▪ Chemical process

optimization

▪ Carbon capture and storage▪ Livestock feed supplements

and vaccines

▪ Nuclear▪ Biofuels – 2nd gen. domestic

▪ Landfill gas flaring▪ Increased bus transport▪ Reduced flaring, oil & gas▪ Cogeneration, oil & gas▪ Biofuels – 1st gen. imported▪ Solar water heaters

▪ Afforestation/ reforestation, forest mgmt

▪ Increased subway transport▪ Wastewater treatment▪ Engine efficiency, HDVs1

▪  Determine overall “low-carbon” growth path

▪  Based on feasibility assessment, determine overall path for emissions under the “low-carbon” scenario

▪  Assess implementation priorities

▪  Decide where focused policy in short term by weighing cost of abatement against ease of implementation

▪  Define requirement for cost curve and link to potential global measures

•  Cost per tonne of abatement, relative to BAU

•  Tonnes of abatement that this lever could offer

▪  Establish “business as usual” (BAU) emissions baseline

▪  Build picture of 2011 emissions bottom-up, forecast of key drivers through 2030, and assessment of potential scenarios

Methodologies M  

• GHG  Inventory  

R  

• Mapping  and  Analysis  

V  

• Strategy  and  Targets  

☐ .

Page 6: Csr measuring outcome

Measuring  Performance.  April  4th  2013     DCCE  Confiden@al:  Do  not  distribute  without  prior  explicit  approval  .  Slide  6  

UAE Aviation State Action Plan Developing  an  integrated  low  carbon  roadmap  for  UAE  Avia@on  

§  Methodology  and  criteria  §  Defini@on,  formats  and  

procedures  §  Baseline  emissions  §  Growth  and  expansion  §  Stakeholder  mapping  

ü  Avia%on  Sector  GHG  Inventory  

§  Data  streams  op@miza@on  §  Standardized  data  policy  §  Current  and  forecasted  ac@vi@es  §  Common  areas  of  development  §  Suitability  to  MBM,  NAMAs  or  

Sectorial  approaches  

ü M&R  Dra6  Policy  

§  Descrip@on  of  ER  measures  §  Cost  and  financing  of  measures  §  Assess  CO2  reduc@on  over  cost  of  

ER  measures  §  Timing  of  measures    §  Legisla@ve  outlook  

ü  Compendium  of  ER  measures  

Development  of    CO2  plan   Monitoring  and  Repor7ng   Mi7ga7on  strategy    

Page 7: Csr measuring outcome

Measuring  Performance.  April  4th  2013     DCCE  Confiden@al:  Do  not  distribute  without  prior  explicit  approval  .  Slide  7  

Selected  Por]olio  Ac@vi@es  Diverse  ac@vi@es  with  emission  reduc@on  core  competencies  

Dubal  GTX  • Steam  Op@miza@on  across  the  en@re  plant  • 350,000  tCO2  p.a.  

Dubal  D18+  • Emission  Reduc@on  in  Aluminum  Produc@on  based  on  new  produc@on  process  architecture  

• 250,000  tCO2  p.a.  

Desalina@on  • Energy  efficiency  of  desalina@on  Pumps  through  the  use  of  newer  technology  

• 15,000  tCO2  p.a.  

Regenera@ve  Burners  • Use  of  waste  gases  in  mel@ng  furnaces  in  lieu  of  cold  air  burners  

• 35,000  tCO2  p.a.  

Green  Building  PoA  • Energy  efficiency  in  Abu  Dhabi  Municipality  • 196,000  tCO2  p.a.  

CFL  • Free  distribu@on  of  CFL  bulbs  to  Dubai  residents  (includes  EK  staff  accommoda@on)  

• 60,000  tCO2  p.a.  

Solar  Farm  •  Installa@on  of  a  10MW  solar  power  plant  on  the  Dubai  Al  Ain  road  

• 14,000  tCO2  p.a.  

Waste  Heat  Recovery  • U@liza@on  of  waste  heat  from  kiln  produc@on  to  generate  15  MW  of  renewable  power  

• 75,000  tCO2  p.a.  

Inlet  Coolers  • U@liza@on  of  pre-­‐cooling  stackable  units  in  power  genera@on  to  bring  inlet  to  ISO  performance  

• 40,000  tCO2  

Absorp@on  Chillers  • U@liza@on  of  heat  as  primary  mean  to  generate  district  cooling  power  for  en@re  Dubal  facility  

• 45,000  tCO2    

Alterna@ve  Fuels  • U@liza@on  of  Refuse  Derived  Fuel  in  industrial  furnaces  as  fuel  replacement  

• 62,000  tCO2  p.a.  

Dubai  Municipality  STP  • Capture  CH4  and  convert  it  in  bio-­‐cng  for  fleet  purposes  

• 85,000  tCO2  p.a.  

Page 8: Csr measuring outcome

Measuring  Performance.  April  4th  2013     DCCE  Confiden@al:  Do  not  distribute  without  prior  explicit  approval  .  Slide  8  

“What  gets  measured,  gets  Done.”    “…  the  general  tendency  in  many  companies  is  to  evaluate  performance  primarily  on  the  basis  of  cost  and  efficiency.  There  are  many  more  criteria  to  judge…”      

Peter Drucker (1909 – 2005)

Page 9: Csr measuring outcome

Measuring  Performance.  April  4th  2013     DCCE  Confiden@al:  Do  not  distribute  without  prior  explicit  approval  .  Slide  9  

Defining the outcome Lessons  leant  from  project  management  

Page 10: Csr measuring outcome

Measuring  Performance.  April  4th  2013     DCCE  Confiden@al:  Do  not  distribute  without  prior  explicit  approval  .  Slide  10  

0102030405060

% o

f res

pond

ents

Primary reason for measurement

Assessing Performance Operational EfficiencyAligning Employees Behaviours Financial ControlStrategic Decision Making External ReportingStrategic Planning Compensation/RewardingValidating Strategy

Neely, A.D.; Yaghi, B. and Youell, N. (2008) “Enterprise Performance Management: The UK State of the Art”, Oracle and Cranfield School of Management.

Reasons for measuring performance Efficiency  and  stakeholders  

Page 11: Csr measuring outcome

Measuring  Performance.  April  4th  2013     DCCE  Confiden@al:  Do  not  distribute  without  prior  explicit  approval  .  Slide  11  

How do countries differ? A  compara@ve  approach  

Australia China Japan UK USA

Performance Assessment (64.37%)

Performance Assessment (77.55%)

Aligning Employee Behaviours (53.40%)

Performance Assessment (58.82%)

Aligning Employee Behaviours (36.59%)

Aligning Employee Behaviours (59.77%)

Aligning Employee Behaviours (35.71%)

Performance Assessment (44.66%)

Improve Operational Efficiency (52.94%)

Improve Operational Efficiency (34.96%)

Improve Operational Efficiency (56.32%)

Improve Operational Efficiency (35.71%)

Improve Strategic Decision Making (43.69%)

Aligning Employee Behaviours (43.44%)

Performance Assessment (34.15%)

Compensation and Reward (35.63%)

Improve Strategic Decision Making (31.63%)

Validating Strategy (40.78%)

Financial Control (39.82%)

Compensation and Reward (22.76%)

Improve Strategic Decision Making (33.33%)

Compensation and Reward (29.59%)

Strategic Planning (37.86%)

Improve Strategic Decision Making (35.91%)

Improve Strategic Decision Making (21.14%)

Financial Control (32.18%)

Strategic Planning (28.57%)

Financial Control (29.13%)

External Reporting (32.87%)

Financial Control (19.51%)

Strategic Planning (26.44%)

Financial Control (20.41%)

Improve Operational Efficiency (25.24%)

Strategic Planning (30.77%)

External Reporting (14.63%)

External Reporting (20.69%)

Validating Strategy (17.35%)

External Reporting (22.33%)

Compensation and Reward (24.20%)

Validating Strategy (13.82%)

Validating Strategy (18.39%)

External Reporting (16.33%)

Compensation and Reward (22.33%)

Validating Strategy (19.00%)

Strategic Planning (13.01%)

Page 12: Csr measuring outcome

Measuring  Performance.  April  4th  2013     DCCE  Confiden@al:  Do  not  distribute  without  prior  explicit  approval  .  Slide  12  

Page 13: Csr measuring outcome

Measuring  Performance.  April  4th  2013     DCCE  Confiden@al:  Do  not  distribute  without  prior  explicit  approval  .  Slide  13  

>

Green Economy for Sustainable Development What  does  the  policy  wishes  to  achieve  

Although  we  are  environmentalist  at  heart,  Dubai’s  core  competency  is  its  business  acumen  and  should  focus  its  efforts  towards  developing  the  synergy  between  business  sector  lead  environmental  ini@a@ves.  Whilst  all  governments  follow  the  typical  top  down  approach,  Dubai  would  follow  the  economic  development  ODA  model  (government  invest  1  dollar  to  achieve  100  dollars  of  GDP)  

Pursue  a  low-­‐carbon  economy  

Develop  a  long  term  plan  to  carbon  intensity  of  GDP  through  the  pursuit  of  economy-­‐wide  measures.  Pursue  a  best  living  environment  approach  in  line  with  UAE  2021  

Develop  a  set  of  measures  aimed  towards  anrac@ng  best-­‐prac@ces  and  climate  change  related  development  to  the  Emirate  of  Dubai  by  leveraging  the    Ø  Sources  of  finance    Ø  Technology  Ø  Intellectual  Property  

Page 14: Csr measuring outcome

Measuring  Performance.  April  4th  2013     DCCE  Confiden@al:  Do  not  distribute  without  prior  explicit  approval  .  Slide  14  

Rationale for the Policy Why  is  climate  change  an  issue  

o  Resources  are  u@lized  inefficiently,  which  means  despite  growth,  the  environmental  cost  is  hidden  and  is  not  taken  into  account  

o  The  environmental  cost  will  have  to  be  assessed  and  responsibili@es  assigned  to  avoid  an  event  whereas  a  global  agreement  is  counterproduc@ve  to  Dubai’s  economy  

o  The  global  communi@es  are  converging  

o  Global  environmental  concerns  can  have  drama@c  effects  on  the  local  economy,  star@ng  form  the  loss  of  valuable  land,  resources  and  infrastructures  

o  The  pursuit  of  energy  leadership  is  a  key  opportunity  seeking  complementarity  form  the  business  sector  

Page 15: Csr measuring outcome

Measuring  Performance.  April  4th  2013     DCCE  Confiden@al:  Do  not  distribute  without  prior  explicit  approval  .  Slide  15  

Renewables   Demand  Side  Management  

Case  study  1  million  free  CFL  bulbs  Investment:  USD  2.5m  Emission  Reduc@ons:  60,000  tCO2  per  annum  

Case  study  10  MW  PV  Solar  Park  Investment:  USD  20m  Emissions  Reduc@ons:  12,000  tCO2  per  annum    

Comparability Which  project  is  best  for  the  Environment?  

Page 16: Csr measuring outcome

Measuring  Performance.  April  4th  2013     DCCE  Confiden@al:  Do  not  distribute  without  prior  explicit  approval  .  Slide  16  

Performance  Measurement  is  a  process  by  which  a  business  unit  objec7vely  assesses  and  evaluates  the  extent  to  which  it  is  accomplishing  a  specific  objec7ve,  goal,  or  mission.  Performance  measurement  alone  is  incomplete.        

• Performance  Management  is  a  systemic  link  between  company  strategy,  Investments,  and  processes.    Performance  Management  is  a  comprehensive  management  process  

Context of measurement

Page 17: Csr measuring outcome

Measuring  Performance.  April  4th  2013     DCCE  Confiden@al:  Do  not  distribute  without  prior  explicit  approval  .  Slide  17  

Outcome objectives What  is  the  ul@mate  success  factor  by  stakeholder  

Enables  decision  making   Manage  by  results   Promote  

accountability  

Dis@nguish  between  program  success  and  failure  

Allow  for  organiza@onal  learning  and  improvement  

Jus@fy  budget  requests  

Op@mize  Investments  

Provide  means  of  performance  comparison  

Fulfill  mandates   Establish  catalysts  for  change  

Raise  early  warnings   And  so  on…  

Page 18: Csr measuring outcome

Measuring  Performance.  April  4th  2013     DCCE  Confiden@al:  Do  not  distribute  without  prior  explicit  approval  .  Slide  18  

Common Denominator Why  do  we  use  CO2e  

Sources GWP  

(IPCC  4th  Assessment  Report)  

GWP  (IPCC  2nd  Assessment  

Report)  

Chemical  Formula Emission

Combus@on  Processes 1 1 CO2 Carbon  dioxide

Landfills,  coal  mining,  waste  water  treatment,  biomass  combus@on

25 21 CH4 Methane

Agricultural  soils  and  nitric  acid  produc@on 298 310 N2O Nitrous  oxide

Subs@tutes  for  ozone  deple@ng  substance,  semi-­‐conductor  manufacturing

14,800 11,700  HFCs  Hydrofluorocarbons

Electrical  transmission  and  distribu@on,   22,800  23,900 SF6 Sulphur  hexaflouride

Subs@tutes  for  ozone  deple@ng  substance,  semi-­‐conductor  manufacturing

7,390  -­‐  12,200 6,500  -­‐  9,200  PFCs  Perfluorocarbons

Page 19: Csr measuring outcome

Measuring  Performance.  April  4th  2013     DCCE  Confiden@al:  Do  not  distribute  without  prior  explicit  approval  .  Slide  19  

Carbon Budget How  much  have  we  spent?  

Only 40% of human CO2 emissions are being absorbed, mostly by vegetation and the oceans. The rest remains in the atmosphere. A natural change of 100ppm normally takes 5,000 to 20.000 years. The recent increase of 100ppm has taken just 120 years.

(in  Gt  CO2e)   Budget      (21st  century)  

Emission  Per  year  

Emissions  to  Dec.  31st  2012  

Balance  to        Dec.  31st  2099  

CO2  Receivables  

1,456   14.6   175   1,281  

CO2  Payable   1,456   30   360   1096  

Difference   206%   25%   75%  

Page 20: Csr measuring outcome

Measuring  Performance.  April  4th  2013     DCCE  Confiden@al:  Do  not  distribute  without  prior  explicit  approval  .  Slide  20  

PRISM approach

PRISM  Stakeholder  Sa@sfac@on  •   (Who  are  the  key  stakeholders  and  what  do  they  want  and  need?)  

Strategies  • (What  cri@cal  processes  do  we  require  if  we  are  to  execute  these  strategies?)  

Processes  • (What  capabili@es  do  we  need  to  operate  and  enhance  these  processes?)  

Capabili@es  • (What  contribu@ons  do  we  require  from  our  stakeholders  if  we  are  to  maintain  and  develop  these  capabili@es?)  

Stakeholder  Contribu@on  • (What  strategies  do  we  have  to  put  in  place  to  sa@sfy  the  wants  and  needs  of  these  key  stakeholders?)  

Value  chain  analysis  

Page 21: Csr measuring outcome

Measuring  Performance.  April  4th  2013     DCCE  Confiden@al:  Do  not  distribute  without  prior  explicit  approval  .  Slide  21  

•  Fast, Right, Cheap & Easy •  Purpose, Care, Skills & Pay •  Trust, Loyalty, Profit & Growth

•  Legal, Fair, Safe & True

•  Return, Reward, Figures & Faith

Stakeholder  Sa7sfac7on  (Stakeholder  Wants  &  Needs)  

Stakeholder  Contribu7on  (Organiza%on  Wants  &  Needs)  

•   Trust,  Loyalty,  Profit  &  Growth        •   Hands,  Hearts,  Minds  &  Voices        •   Fast,  Right,  Cheap  &  Easy  

•   Rules,  Reason,  Clarity  &  Advice  

•   Capital,  Credit,  Risk  &  Support  

Stakeholders  

Customers  &  Intermediaries  

Employees  

Regulators  &  Communi7es  

Suppliers  

Investors  

Stakeholder perspectives Think  of  a  u@li@es  provider…  

Page 22: Csr measuring outcome

Measuring  Performance.  April  4th  2013     DCCE  Confiden@al:  Do  not  distribute  without  prior  explicit  approval  .  Slide  22  

Setting Indicators

Mission: Protect people and property

Strategic Goal #1: Reduce damage caused by motor vehicle accidents

Annual performance goal 1A: Reduce serious accidents by 20% per

100 km traveled by 2012

Measure: Number of accidents per 100 km traveled

Page 23: Csr measuring outcome

Measuring  Performance.  April  4th  2013     DCCE  Confiden@al:  Do  not  distribute  without  prior  explicit  approval  .  Slide  23  

Before we can map your strategy . . . Quan@fiable  strategic  objec@ves  

o Improve  Costumer  Service  

 o Reduce  Costumer  collec@on  @mes  by  30%  by  year  end  

Make sure objectives have a direct relationship to goals and goals have a direct relationship to mission and values.

Too vague

More precise

Page 24: Csr measuring outcome

Measuring  Performance.  April  4th  2013     DCCE  Confiden@al:  Do  not  distribute  without  prior  explicit  approval  .  Slide  24  

BSC in a Nutshell

•  A  framework  for  breaking  strategy  into  ac@onable  components  called,  Strategic  Objec%ves.    

•  An  effec@ve  Strategic  Management  System  for  aligning  day-­‐to-­‐day  work  to  an  organiza@on’s  vision  and  strategy.    

•  An  integrated  framework  for  informing  strategic  budge%ng,  and  allowing  the  organiza@on  to  learn  what  works  and  to  become  more  strategy  focused.  

   

Green  Scorecards?  

In  other  words,  the  BSC  is  an  integrated  performance-­‐based  strategic  planning  and  management  system.  It  is  not  just  a  measurement  system!  

Page 25: Csr measuring outcome

Measuring  Performance.  April  4th  2013     DCCE  Confiden@al:  Do  not  distribute  without  prior  explicit  approval  .  Slide  25  

Strategic Performance Objectives (SPOs) are key to understanding the BSC. They represent

the building blocks of the BSC. Each one of you should familiarize yourself with the 10

SPOs.

Examples from Humanitarian Industry

Page 26: Csr measuring outcome

Measuring  Performance.  April  4th  2013     DCCE  Confiden@al:  Do  not  distribute  without  prior  explicit  approval  .  Slide  26  

Cascading and defining outcomes

These are examples of activities designed by

the OPCOs to contribute to the

corporate strategy, based against impact, cost, complexity and

constraints

Page 27: Csr measuring outcome

Measuring  Performance.  April  4th  2013     DCCE  Confiden@al:  Do  not  distribute  without  prior  explicit  approval  .  Slide  27  

Dashboard

Monitor only the yellow and red flags….

… from the OPCO dashboard….

… Click on any traffic light to

receive detailed info

Page 28: Csr measuring outcome

Measuring  Performance.  April  4th  2013     DCCE  Confiden@al:  Do  not  distribute  without  prior  explicit  approval  .  Slide  28  

Each indicator is explained in details in the

Indicator Sheet

The 2008 corporate targets are included on

each indicator sheet

Click on the “See details by RO” link to get an overview of

the regional targets for the

indicator in question

Planning is key

Page 29: Csr measuring outcome

Measuring  Performance.  April  4th  2013     DCCE  Confiden@al:  Do  not  distribute  without  prior  explicit  approval  .  Slide  29  

The Traffic Lights Status page gives you the traffic lights distribution by

perspective, by region and by Strategic Performance Objective

Traffic lights distribution status is updated when new results are available on the BSC

site. The latest update can be seen below the table

Keep it simple

Page 30: Csr measuring outcome

Measuring  Performance.  April  4th  2013     DCCE  Confiden@al:  Do  not  distribute  without  prior  explicit  approval  .  Slide  30  

The main BSC dashboard gives you a general overview of UNOPS performance at any given point in time. Performance status for each indicator and region are displayed

on the BSC dashboard

To quickly access detailed results by perspective or by region use the appropriate

dropdown menu

Daily routines

Page 31: Csr measuring outcome

Measuring  Performance.  April  4th  2013     DCCE  Confiden@al:  Do  not  distribute  without  prior  explicit  approval  .  Slide  31  

1.  Don’t start with what should we measure. 2.  Instead start with what questions do we want to be able to

answer. 3.  The questions that matter for different organisations are

context dependent. 4.  So do not look for standardised sets of measures that can be

used for CSR. 5.  We can, however, look for standardised frameworks – such as

the Performance Prism – to help structure our thinking.

Reflections

Page 32: Csr measuring outcome

Measuring  Performance.  April  4th  2013     DCCE  Confiden@al:  Do  not  distribute  without  prior  explicit  approval  .  Slide  32  

GET INSPIRED

Ivano  Iannelli  |  [email protected]  |  www.dcce.ae